dc.contributor | 中文系 | |
dc.creator (作者) | 陳英傑 | |
dc.date (日期) | 2017-10 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 4-七月-2024 14:12:29 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 4-七月-2024 14:12:29 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 4-七月-2024 14:12:29 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152268 | - |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 明代中葉復古派的崛起,和其對「杜甫詩」價值和意義的掌握有極為密切之聯繫。如欲深刻瞭解復古派詩學所以建立的原委、樣貌和理想,理當不能忽略其杜詩批評此一關鍵線索。緣此,本計畫擬探究的核心問題是:杜詩究竟為復古派提供了什麼樣的詩學資源或啟迪? 圍繞著李夢陽的詩學論見和相關記述,雖已能初步測知其所特重的「法」之觀念,應得自於對杜甫詩法別有獨到的詮釋和掌握。但關於「法」之內涵,則必須待謝榛、李攀龍和王世貞登上詩壇,方始開出具體而精細的分析。如謝榛對杜詩聲調、情景關係之討論,王世貞將杜詩價值限縮於特定詩體的觀念,都是兩人所自覺到超越前行詩論家的大創發;通過李攀龍《古今詩刪》選序杜詩及其在當時引爆的高度爭議性,也能窺見復古派對杜詩所以堪為典範的代表作篇目,尚處於一個什麼樣的浮動狀況。綜觀謝榛、李攀龍和王世貞之說,既有互涉也不乏對諍,其實共同構成了復古派杜詩批評前此未見的熱切景觀。以他們為代表,也尤能凸顯出復古派的杜詩批評型態,乃伴隨著非常濃郁的詩法論述色彩。他們不斷憑藉杜詩批評去豐富化「法」的內涵,也運用日益敏銳的「法」眼,去觀照、辨識杜詩的崇高價值和大瑕小疵。「尊杜」、「攻杜」同時並進,竟鍛造出復古派杜詩批評和詩法論述的雙面刃。更值得注意的是,由他們的批評和論述,也更清楚地昭顯出復古派之取資於杜詩者,並不在於形式性、局部性的詩法規範,而更在於高懸一種奇正自如、法極無跡的詩學理想。綜言之,本計畫擬以謝榛、李攀龍和王世貞為中心,藉而探究復古派的杜詩批評和詩法論述,期能解決前揭的核心問題。本計畫預計以一年為期,利用堅實的文獻基礎展開研究。倘能順利獲得補助、執行,將可為明代復古派詩論研究、杜詩學研究提供專題性的研究成果。 | |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This project focus on how Revivalist in Ming Dynasty evaluate Du Fu’s poetry. If we want to understand the characteristics of Revivalist, can’t ignore the important clue on Du Fu’ poetry. Through discussion on Li Meng-yang, we can know the the rules to consider in composition, that is the reason of Revivalist appreciate Du Fu’s poetry. But, the writings of Li Meng-yang is too curtness. Until Xie Zhen, Li Pan-long and Wang Shi-zhen, this topic has proposed a more detailed discussion. For example, Xie Zhen discusses the issue “Tone”, “Emotion” and “Scape” on poetry. Wang Shi-zhen noted stylistic problems of Du Fu’s poetry. Xie and Wang believed that their claims beyond the predecessors. Li Pan-long’s Gu-Jin Shi-Shan selected Du Fu’s poetry, also it helps to understand the complex concept of Revivalist. Their views relate to each other, but there are some conflicts. According their writings, we can find the criticism on Du Fu’s poetry by Revivalist, attach importance to the rule of poetry. This is an important feature. It is noteworthy, the writing tips in not the most important thing, Revivalist send more emphasis is the flexible use ideal. The project amis to complete within one year. The project is expected to provide a new way to evaluate Du Fu’s poetry and acquire specific understanding to the forming of paradigm of Du Fu. The progress of research, the methods expected to adopt, the research schedule, and the expected results are briefly stated in the plan. | |
dc.format.extent | 116 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
dc.relation (關聯) | 科技部, MOST105-2410-H004-196, 105.08-106.07 | |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 杜詩批評; 詩法論述; 明代復古派; 謝榛; 李攀龍; 王世貞 | |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Criticism on Du Fu’s Poetry; Discourse on the rules of poetry; Revivalist in Ming Dynasty; Xie Zhen; Li Pan-long; Wang Shi-zhen | |
dc.title (題名) | 明代復古派的杜詩批評和詩法論述:以謝榛、李攀龍、王世貞為中心 | |
dc.title (題名) | Criticism on Du Fu’S Poetry by the Revivalist in Ming Dynasty: According to the Writings of Xie Zhen, Li Pan-Long and Wang Shi-Zhen | |
dc.type (資料類型) | report | |