學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 永續供應商評選因素研究 - 以能源產業G公司為例
Research on Factors for Selecting Sustainable Suppliers - Take Company G in the Energy Industry as an Example作者 盧坤郁
Lu, Kun-Yu貢獻者 黃國峯<br>林谷合
Huang, Kuo-Feng
盧坤郁
Lu, Kun-Yu關鍵詞 供應商評選
永續供應鏈管理
能源產業
層級分析法
Supplier Selection
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Energy Industry
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).日期 2024 上傳時間 5-八月-2024 12:10:11 (UTC+8) 摘要 隨著全球經濟的發展，企業面臨著資源耗盡、生態環境惡化以及社會問題等多重挑戰。因此，永續發展成為企業策略的重要組成部分。特別是在新冠疫情下，供應鏈中斷問題暴露了企業在供應商管理上的脆弱性。因此，建立一套有效的永續供應商評選體系顯得尤為重要，而能源產業作為全球經濟的重要支柱，特別需要在供應商評選中考慮永續發展的要求，以應對未來的挑戰。 本研究主要採用層級分析法（AHP）進行因素分析與排序，根據經濟、環境、社會三重底線進行因素分析與排序，文獻探討顯示，能源產業在供應商評選中，不僅需考量經濟因素，還必須將環境和社會因素納入考量。具體而言，經濟因素包括成本、品質、交期等傳統指標；環境因素則涉及供應商的環保措施、資源利用效率等；社會因素則包括勞動條件、社會責任等。 通過AHP分析，本研究確立了各因素的權重排序，其中在整體準則上，前五大排序為「工作安全與健康」、「遵守法規」、「有害物質管理」、「品質」與「污染控制」，從中得知前五項中以社會層面與環境層面為主，了解企業針對永續供應商評選時，將會由社會面與環境面作為首要考量。 本研究對企業、供應商及學術界均具有重要貢獻。對企業而言，提供了一套科學的供應商評選框架，幫助提升供應鏈管理水平及永續發展能力，通過系統性的分析方法，為能源產業在永續發展背景下進行供應商評選提供了實用的框架和建議，有助於提升企業的永續發展能力。對供應商而言，了解客戶在永續發展上的需求，有助於提升自身競爭力。對學術界而言，本研究豐富了永續供應鏈管理的理論體系，為後續研究提供了參考。放遠未來，企業應在供應商評選中更加重視環境和社會因素，並持續改進供應鏈管理策略，以實現長期的永續發展目標。
With the development of the global economy, companies face multiple challenges such as resource depletion, ecological degradation, and social issues. Therefore, sustainable development has become an important part of corporate strategy. Particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruptions have exposed the vulnerabilities in supplier management. Consequently, establishing an effective sustainable supplier selection system is of paramount importance, especially for the energy industry, which is a key pillar of the global economy and needs to consider sustainable development requirements in supplier selection to address future challenges. This study primarily employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to analyze and rank factors based on the triple bottom line of economic, environmental, and social aspects. Literature review indicates that in supplier selection, the energy industry must consider not only economic factors but also environmental and social factors. Specifically, economic factors include traditional indicators such as cost, quality, and delivery time; environmental factors involve suppliers' environmental protection measures and resource utilization efficiency; and social factors encompass labor conditions and social responsibility. Through AHP analysis, this study establishes the weight ranking of each factor. The top five criteria are "work safety and health," "compliance with regulations," "management of hazardous substances," "quality," and "pollution control," indicating that the top considerations are primarily social and environmental aspects. This reveals that companies prioritize social and environmental factors when selecting sustainable suppliers. This study makes significant contributions to businesses, suppliers, and academia. For businesses, it provides a scientific supplier selection framework that helps enhance supply chain management and sustainable development capabilities. Through systematic analysis methods, it offers practical frameworks and recommendations for the energy industry in supplier selection under the sustainable development context, thereby enhancing the sustainable development capacity of companies. For suppliers, understanding customers' sustainability requirements can help improve their competitiveness. For academia, this study enriches the theoretical system of sustainable supply chain management and provides a reference for subsequent research. Looking forward, companies should place more emphasis on environmental and social factors in supplier selection and continuously improve supply chain management strategies to achieve long-term sustainable development goals.參考文獻 中文文獻： 許振邦. (2017). 採購與供應管理. 智勝出版. 褚志鵬. (2009). 層級分析法 (AHP) 理論與實作. 取自: http://faculty. ndhu. edu. tw/~ chpchu/POMR_Taipei _2009/AHP2009. pdf. 鄧振源, & 曾國雄. (1989). 層級分析法的內涵特性與應用 (上). 中國統計學報, 第廿七卷, 六期, 頁, 5-22. 英文文獻： Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 52, 329-341. Badurdeen, F., Iyengar, D., Goldsby, T. J., Metta, H., Gupta, S., & Jawahir, I. (2009). Extending total life-cycle thinking to sustainable supply chain design. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 4(1-3), 49-67. Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 38(5), 360-387. Chan, F. S. (2003). Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: an analytical hierarchy process approach. International journal of production research, 41(15), 3549-3579. COSCM. (2003). Supply Chain Management Process Standards. Council, S. C. (2008). Supply chain operations reference model. Overview of SCOR version, 5(0). Dickson, G. W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of purchasing, 2(1), 5-17. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business strategy and the environment, 11(2), 130-141. Elkington, J. (1997). The triple bottom line. Environmental management: Readings and cases, 2, 49-66. Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106 Ghodsypour, S. H., & O'brien, C. (1998). A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics, 56, 199-212. Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Jafarian, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of cleaner production, 47, 345-354. Haake, H., & Seuring, S. (2009). Sustainable procurement of minor items–exploring limits to sustainability. Sustainable development, 17(5), 284-294. Hinkle, C. L., Robinson, P. J., & Green, P. E. (1969). Vendor Evaluation Using Cluster Analysis. Journal of purchasing, 5, 49-58. Kuo, R. J., Wang, Y. C., & Tien, F. C. (2010). Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. Journal of cleaner production, 18(12), 1161-1170. Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K., & Garg, C. P. (2017). An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of cleaner production, 140, 1686-1698. Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business logistics, 22(2), 1-25. Min, H. (1994). International supplier selection: a multi‐attribute utility approach. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 24(5), 24-33. Monczka, R. M., Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (1998). Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: the buying company perspective. Decision sciences, 29(3), 553-577. Om Pal, A. K. G., R. K. Garg (2013). Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods in Supply Chains: A Review International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, vol.7. Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of supply chain management, 45(2), 37-56. Ross, D. F. (1997). Competing through supply chain management: creating market-winning strategies through supply chain partnerships. Springer Science & Business Media. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(11), 1073-1076. Sarkis, J., & Dhavale, D. G. (2015). Supplier selection for sustainable operations: A triple-bottom-line approach using a Bayesian framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 177-191. Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 16(15), 1699-1710. Shyur, H.-J., & Shih, H.-S. (2006). A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection. Mathematical and computer modelling, 44(7-8), 749-761. Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (1999). Designing and managing the supply chain: Concepts, strategies, and cases. McGraw-hill New York. Sivakumar, R., Kannan, D., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Green vendor evaluation and selection using AHP and Taguchi loss functions in production outsourcing in mining industry. Resources Policy, 46, 64-75. Stevens, G. C. (1989). Integrating the supply chain. international Journal of physical distribution & Materials Management, 19(8), 3-8. Trent, R. J., & Monczka, R. M. (1994). Effective cross‐functional sourcing teams: Critical success factors. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 30(3), 2-11. Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., & Benton, W. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European journal of operational research, 50(1), 2-18. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
111363021資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111363021 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 黃國峯<br>林谷合 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Huang, Kuo-Feng en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 盧坤郁 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Lu, Kun-Yu en_US dc.creator (作者) 盧坤郁 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Lu, Kun-Yu en_US dc.date (日期) 2024 en_US dc.date.accessioned 5-八月-2024 12:10:11 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 5-八月-2024 12:10:11 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-八月-2024 12:10:11 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0111363021 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152426 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 111363021 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 隨著全球經濟的發展，企業面臨著資源耗盡、生態環境惡化以及社會問題等多重挑戰。因此，永續發展成為企業策略的重要組成部分。特別是在新冠疫情下，供應鏈中斷問題暴露了企業在供應商管理上的脆弱性。因此，建立一套有效的永續供應商評選體系顯得尤為重要，而能源產業作為全球經濟的重要支柱，特別需要在供應商評選中考慮永續發展的要求，以應對未來的挑戰。 本研究主要採用層級分析法（AHP）進行因素分析與排序，根據經濟、環境、社會三重底線進行因素分析與排序，文獻探討顯示，能源產業在供應商評選中，不僅需考量經濟因素，還必須將環境和社會因素納入考量。具體而言，經濟因素包括成本、品質、交期等傳統指標；環境因素則涉及供應商的環保措施、資源利用效率等；社會因素則包括勞動條件、社會責任等。 通過AHP分析，本研究確立了各因素的權重排序，其中在整體準則上，前五大排序為「工作安全與健康」、「遵守法規」、「有害物質管理」、「品質」與「污染控制」，從中得知前五項中以社會層面與環境層面為主，了解企業針對永續供應商評選時，將會由社會面與環境面作為首要考量。 本研究對企業、供應商及學術界均具有重要貢獻。對企業而言，提供了一套科學的供應商評選框架，幫助提升供應鏈管理水平及永續發展能力，通過系統性的分析方法，為能源產業在永續發展背景下進行供應商評選提供了實用的框架和建議，有助於提升企業的永續發展能力。對供應商而言，了解客戶在永續發展上的需求，有助於提升自身競爭力。對學術界而言，本研究豐富了永續供應鏈管理的理論體系，為後續研究提供了參考。放遠未來，企業應在供應商評選中更加重視環境和社會因素，並持續改進供應鏈管理策略，以實現長期的永續發展目標。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) With the development of the global economy, companies face multiple challenges such as resource depletion, ecological degradation, and social issues. Therefore, sustainable development has become an important part of corporate strategy. Particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruptions have exposed the vulnerabilities in supplier management. Consequently, establishing an effective sustainable supplier selection system is of paramount importance, especially for the energy industry, which is a key pillar of the global economy and needs to consider sustainable development requirements in supplier selection to address future challenges. This study primarily employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to analyze and rank factors based on the triple bottom line of economic, environmental, and social aspects. Literature review indicates that in supplier selection, the energy industry must consider not only economic factors but also environmental and social factors. Specifically, economic factors include traditional indicators such as cost, quality, and delivery time; environmental factors involve suppliers' environmental protection measures and resource utilization efficiency; and social factors encompass labor conditions and social responsibility. Through AHP analysis, this study establishes the weight ranking of each factor. The top five criteria are "work safety and health," "compliance with regulations," "management of hazardous substances," "quality," and "pollution control," indicating that the top considerations are primarily social and environmental aspects. This reveals that companies prioritize social and environmental factors when selecting sustainable suppliers. This study makes significant contributions to businesses, suppliers, and academia. For businesses, it provides a scientific supplier selection framework that helps enhance supply chain management and sustainable development capabilities. Through systematic analysis methods, it offers practical frameworks and recommendations for the energy industry in supplier selection under the sustainable development context, thereby enhancing the sustainable development capacity of companies. For suppliers, understanding customers' sustainability requirements can help improve their competitiveness. For academia, this study enriches the theoretical system of sustainable supply chain management and provides a reference for subsequent research. Looking forward, companies should place more emphasis on environmental and social factors in supplier selection and continuously improve supply chain management strategies to achieve long-term sustainable development goals. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究流程 3 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 供應鏈管理 5 第二節 永續供應鏈管理 9 第三節 永續供應商評選準則 11 第四節 供應商評選方法 15 第三章 研究方法 18 第一節 研究架構 18 第二節 AHP 層級分析法 19 第三節 問卷設計 24 第四節 研究對象 29 第四章 研究分析與結果 30 第一節 個案公司介紹 30 第二節 問卷發放結果 33 第三節 問卷結果分析 34 第五章 結論與建議 42 第一節 結論 42 第二節 未來建議 44 第三節 研究貢獻 45 第四節 研究限制 46 參考文獻 48 附錄 51 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2316242 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111363021 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 供應商評選 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 永續供應鏈管理 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 能源產業 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 層級分析法 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Supplier Selection en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Sustainable Supply Chain Management en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Energy Industry en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). en_US dc.title (題名) 永續供應商評選因素研究 - 以能源產業G公司為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Research on Factors for Selecting Sustainable Suppliers - Take Company G in the Energy Industry as an Example en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻： 許振邦. (2017). 採購與供應管理. 智勝出版. 褚志鵬. (2009). 層級分析法 (AHP) 理論與實作. 取自: http://faculty. ndhu. edu. tw/~ chpchu/POMR_Taipei _2009/AHP2009. pdf. 鄧振源, & 曾國雄. (1989). 層級分析法的內涵特性與應用 (上). 中國統計學報, 第廿七卷, 六期, 頁, 5-22. 英文文獻： Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 52, 329-341. Badurdeen, F., Iyengar, D., Goldsby, T. J., Metta, H., Gupta, S., & Jawahir, I. (2009). Extending total life-cycle thinking to sustainable supply chain design. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 4(1-3), 49-67. Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 38(5), 360-387. Chan, F. S. (2003). Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: an analytical hierarchy process approach. International journal of production research, 41(15), 3549-3579. COSCM. (2003). Supply Chain Management Process Standards. Council, S. C. (2008). Supply chain operations reference model. Overview of SCOR version, 5(0). Dickson, G. W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of purchasing, 2(1), 5-17. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business strategy and the environment, 11(2), 130-141. Elkington, J. (1997). The triple bottom line. Environmental management: Readings and cases, 2, 49-66. Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106 Ghodsypour, S. H., & O'brien, C. (1998). A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics, 56, 199-212. Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Jafarian, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of cleaner production, 47, 345-354. Haake, H., & Seuring, S. (2009). Sustainable procurement of minor items–exploring limits to sustainability. Sustainable development, 17(5), 284-294. Hinkle, C. L., Robinson, P. J., & Green, P. E. (1969). Vendor Evaluation Using Cluster Analysis. Journal of purchasing, 5, 49-58. Kuo, R. J., Wang, Y. C., & Tien, F. C. (2010). Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. Journal of cleaner production, 18(12), 1161-1170. Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K., & Garg, C. P. (2017). An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of cleaner production, 140, 1686-1698. Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business logistics, 22(2), 1-25. Min, H. (1994). International supplier selection: a multi‐attribute utility approach. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 24(5), 24-33. Monczka, R. M., Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (1998). Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: the buying company perspective. Decision sciences, 29(3), 553-577. Om Pal, A. K. G., R. K. Garg (2013). Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods in Supply Chains: A Review International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, vol.7. Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of supply chain management, 45(2), 37-56. Ross, D. F. (1997). Competing through supply chain management: creating market-winning strategies through supply chain partnerships. Springer Science & Business Media. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(11), 1073-1076. Sarkis, J., & Dhavale, D. G. (2015). Supplier selection for sustainable operations: A triple-bottom-line approach using a Bayesian framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 177-191. Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 16(15), 1699-1710. Shyur, H.-J., & Shih, H.-S. (2006). A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection. Mathematical and computer modelling, 44(7-8), 749-761. Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (1999). Designing and managing the supply chain: Concepts, strategies, and cases. McGraw-hill New York. Sivakumar, R., Kannan, D., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Green vendor evaluation and selection using AHP and Taguchi loss functions in production outsourcing in mining industry. Resources Policy, 46, 64-75. Stevens, G. C. (1989). Integrating the supply chain. international Journal of physical distribution & Materials Management, 19(8), 3-8. Trent, R. J., & Monczka, R. M. (1994). Effective cross‐functional sourcing teams: Critical success factors. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 30(3), 2-11. Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., & Benton, W. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European journal of operational research, 50(1), 2-18. zh_TW
