學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 留守兒童社區育兒計畫：印尼案例研究
COMMUNITY PARENTING PROGRAMS FOR LEFT-BEHIND CHILDREN: A Case Study in Indonesia作者 韓佳婷
Hastasari, Chatia貢獻者 林季平
Ji-Ping Lin
韓佳婷
Chatia Hastasari關鍵詞 留守兒童
社區養育
生產性移民村
溝通網絡
多向照護
Left behind children
community parenting
productive migrant villages
communication network
multidirectional care日期 2024 上傳時間 5-八月-2024 12:59:26 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究旨在探討參與社區養育行動者網絡的組成; 在微觀和中觀層面上實施社區養育的多向照護; 微觀和中觀因素在塑造社區養育的重要性; 實施社區養育的成效與挑戰; 以及形塑社區養育的其他因素. 隨著移工人數不斷增加, 截至 2021年已達到 72, 624人 (BP2MI, 2021), 與父母分離的留守兒童數量亦不斷上升. 此外, 因留守兒童與其代理養育者之間存在著世代差異, 而每一代人所堅持的理想價值觀存在極大的差異化, 所以常導致雙方的溝通隔閡. 然而, 在菲律賓這種溝通障礙可藉由留守家庭的多向照護和來自大家庭的良好支持系統來克服. 與此同時, 良好的社會支持系統對留守兒童的重要性也成為印尼政府的關注焦點. 基於此現象, 本研究運用尤里·布朗芬布倫納 (Bronfenbrenner) 的理論和多向照護的概念來分析社區養育的實施. 通過質性研究方法, 本研究在印德拉瑪育選擇了有代表性的受訪者, 包括村政府, 代理養育者, 移工母親, 留守兒童和社會團體代表. 本研究的結果是: (1) 在社區層面, 參與社區養育行動者的角色並無顯著差異. 然而, 在家庭層面, 留守家庭與非留守家庭的父母角色則有明顯差異. 在非留守家庭中, 父母作為主要教養者, 對於孩子來說仍然扮演著非常重要的角色, 而社區養育行為者僅為輔助作用. 相比之下, 對於留守兒童, 代理養育者, 移工母親和社區養育者的角色相互交織和相輔相成, 因此這些行動者皆可被視為擔任留守兒童的主要養育者; (2) 在留守家庭中, 與社區養育者的互動不僅限於口頭交流, 還包括非語言交流, 如照顧留守兒童. 這些行為滿足了孩子的基本需求, 包括生存, 基本能力和福祉需求; (3) 留守兒童與其微觀系統之間的積極互動成為改善他們在家庭層面上所面臨的照護缺失問題,成為重要的支持因素. 此外, 社區機構行為者在中觀系統層面的互動也是塑造社區養育計劃的重要因素. 因社區機構在每個村莊的計劃中充當支持者和協調者; (4) 早在社區養育計劃實施之前, 社區機構在管理活動方面成功運作, 而成員的自發性使得社區養育在兩個村莊中有效運行. 然而, 該計劃面臨的挑戰包括每個任期村長 (Kuwu) 和社區機構管理層的變更, 以及計畫缺乏定期評估. 可能因此阻礙社區養育計劃的改進或持續性; (5) 村莊社區世代相傳的互助 (gotong royong) 文化在塑造兩個村莊的社區養育方面也起到了重要作用.
This research aims to find out the composition actor network involved in community parenting; the implementation of multidirectional care in community parenting at the micro and meso levels; the important of micro and meso elements in shaping community parenting; the effectiveness and the challenges involved in the implementation of community parenting; and other factors involved in shaping community parenting. With the increasing number of migrant labors which reach 72,624 people in 2021 (BP2MI, 2021), there has also been an increase in the number of left behind children who live separately from their migrant parents. In addition, the existence of generational differences between left behind children and their surrogate carers often causes communication gap as each generation is attached to certain ideal values that are very different from one another. However, this communication gap can be overcome in Filipinos left behind families with a good support system from the extended family through multidirectional care. In line with this, the importance of a good social support system for left behind children also becomes the concern of Indonesian government. Based on this phenomenon, this research used Bronfenbrenner's theory and the conceptual of multidirectional care to analyze the implementation of community parenting. By using qualitative approach, the informants in this study which was located in Indramayu, were selected purposively, namely village government; surrogate carer, migrant mother, left behind children, and social group representatives. The results of this research are (1) In terms of actors’ role involved in community parenting, there is no difference in this regard at the community level. However, the differences in the role of parents at the family level are very clear. In non-left behind families, parents as the main actors still have a very big role for their children and community actors only have an additional role. Meanwhile, in left behind children, the roles of surrogate carer, migrant mother, and community actors are intertwined and complement each other; (2) In left behind families, the involvement of community actors who are intertwined and complementary with surrogate carer is not only limited to verbal interactions but also non-verbal interactions such as providing care for left behind children. This action then leads to fulfilling children's basic needs, which consist of basic biological survival, basic capabilities, and basic well-being needs; (3) The interaction between community institution actors at the meso system level is also an important element that can shape the community parenting program, because community institutions here function as supporting elements and facilitator in every village program; (4) the success of each community institution in managing activities in the community long before the community parenting program was implemented and the type of membership in community institutions which is voluntary, made community parenting run effectively in both villages. Meanwhile the challenges of this program are the change of Kuwu and community institution management in each period and the absence of regular evaluations which can hinder the improvement or sustainability of community parenting program; and (5) The culture of gotong royong which has been adopted for generations by village communities in general has also an important role in shaping community parenting in both villages.參考文獻 Abrego, Leisy J. 2014. Sacrificing families: Navigating laws, Labor, and Love across Borders. California: Stanford University Press. Anderson, Benedict Richard O'Gorman. 1990. Language and power: Exploring political cultures in Indonesia. New York: Cornell University Press. Ahmadi, Dadi. 2008. “Interaksi simbolik: Suatu pengantar.” Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi 9 (2): 301-316. Akama, Yoko, Susan Chaplin, and Peter Fairbrother. 2014. “Role of Social Networks in Community Preparedness for Bushfire.” International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 5(3): 227–91. Almira, Litha, Lathifah Hanum, and Adhityawarman Menaldi. 2019. “Relationship with children and the psychological well-being of the elderly in Indonesia.” SAGE Open Medicine 7: 1 – 6. Anshor, Maria Ulfah. 2017. Memutus Rantai Ketidakadilan Global Care dalam Pengasuhan Anak Tenaga Kerja Indonesia Perempuan: Studi Pengasuhan Anak TKI Perempuan pada Pesantren di Indramayu. Indonesia: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia. Antman, Francisca M. 2013. “The impact of migration on family left behind.” In International handbook on the economics of migration, edited by Amelie F. Constant and Klaus F. Zimmermann, 293-308. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Asis, Maruja MB. 2006. “Living with migration: Experiences of left-behind children in the Philippines.” Asian population studies 2 (1): 45-67. Biddle, Bruce J. 1986. “Recent developments in role theory.” Annual review of sociology 12 (1): 67-92. Basu, Kaushik, Sanghamitra Das, and Bhaskar Dutta. 2010. “Child labor and household wealth: Theory and empirical evidence of an inverted-U.” Journal of development economics 91 (1): 8-14. Battistella, Graziano, and Ma Cecilia G. Conaco. 1998. “The impact of labour migration on the children left behind: a study of elementary school children in the Philippines.” SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 13 (2): 220-241. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41056988 Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 1979. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. New York: Harvard university press. . 1994. “Ecological models of human development.” International encyclopedia of education 3 (2): 37-43. Chang, Andy Scott. 2021. “Selling a resume and buying a job: Stratification of gender and occupation by states and brokers in international migration from Indonesia.” Social Problems 68 (4): 903-924. Charon, Joel M. 1995. Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Chen, Feinian, Susan E. Short, and Barbara Entwisle. 2000. “The impact of grandparental proximity on maternal childcare in China.” Population Research and Policy Review 19 (6): 571-590. Chotimah, Chusnul, Rohmad Widodo, and Trisakti Handayani. 2019. “Efektivitas Lembaga Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Desa Bululawang.” Jurnal Civic Hukum 4 (2): 103-113. Christiani, Lintang Citra, and Prinisia Nurul Ikasari. 2020. “Generasi Z dan pemeliharaan relasi antar generasi dalam perspektif budaya Jawa.” Jurnal komunikasi dan kajian media 4 (2): 84-105. Clement, Grade. 1996. Care, autonomy, and justice. Boulder: Westview Press. Cuellar, Jessica, Deborah J. Jones, and Emma Sterrett. 2015. “Examining parenting in the neighborhood context: A review.” Journal of Child and Family Studies 24: 195-219. DeVito, Joseph A. 2019. “The interpersonal communication book.” Instructor 1 (18): 521-532. Démurger, Sylvie. 2015. “Migration and families left behind.” IZA World of Labor: 1-9. Engster, Daniel. 2005. “Rethinking care theory: The practice of caring and the obligation to care.” Hypatia 20 (3): 50-74. Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 2000. “The sustainability of welfare states into the twenty-first century.” International Journal of Health Services 30 (1): 1-12. Faisal, Sanapiah. (2003). Format-format penelitian sosial. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. Fitriani, Dian. 2016. “Faktor lingkungan yang memengaruhi pernikahan remaja perempuan.” Jurnal Kesehatan Indra Husada 4 (2): 21-28. Francisco-Menchavez, Valerie. 2018. The labor of care: Filipina migrants and transnational families in the digital age. Chicago: University of Illinois Press. Ge, Yan, et al. 2019. “Studies on left‐behind children in China: Reviewing paradigm shifts.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 163: 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20267 Goodin, Robert E. 1985. Protecting the vulnerable: A re-analysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Graham, Elspeth, et al. 2012. “Transnational families and the family nexus: perspectives of Indonesian and Filipino children left behind by migrant parent (s).” Environment and Planning A 44 (4): 793-815. Grusec, Joan E. 2002. “Parental socialization and children’s acquisition of values.” Handbook of parenting 5 (2): 143-167. Gu, Xiaorong. 2022. “Save the children!: Governing left-behind children through family in China’s Great Migration.” Current sociology 70 (4): 513-538. Romina Guevarra, Anna. 2006. “Managing ‘vulnerabilities’ and ‘empowering’migrant Filipina workers: the Philippines’ Overseas Employment Program.” Social Identities 12 (5): 523-541. Guo, Jing, et al. 2015. “Depression among migrant and left-behind children in China in relation to the quality of parent-child and teacher-child relationships.” PLoS One 10 (12): 1-15 Hariyanto, Fajar. 2017. “Komunikasi Keluarga Orang Tua Berprofesi Tenaga Kerja Indonesia (TKI) Di Kabupaten Karawang.” Jurnal Politikom Indonesiana 2 (2): 177-177. Hoang, Lan Anh, Brenda SA Yeoh, and Anna Marie Wattie. 2012. “Transnational labour migration and the politics of care in the Southeast Asian family.” Geoforum 43 (4): 733-740. Hoang, Lan Anh, et al. 2015. “Transnational migration, changing care arrangements and left-behind children's responses in South-east Asia.” Children's geographies 13 (3): 263-277. Isroji, Isroji, and Agus Moh Najib. 2022. “Peraturan Daerah Bernuansa Syari’ah Di Indramayu Dan Tasikmalaya: Agama, Politik Lokal Dan Ancaman Disintegrasi.” Ulumuddin: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman 12 (2): 247-272. Jin, Feifei, et al. 2021. “Health status of left-behind children and parenting behaviors of caregivers in poor rural areas—6 provinces, China, 2018.” China CDC weekly 3 (3): 54. Johnson, J. David, et al. 1994. “Differences between formal and informal communication channels.” The Journal of Business Communication 31 (2): 111-122. Jubaedi, Siti Umiroh, and Ujang Syafrudin. 2020. “Pengaruh Sosial Budaya Terhadap Pernikahan Di Bawah Umur Di Kecamatan Jatibarang Kabupaten Indramayu.” INKLUSIF: Jurnal Pengkajian Ekonomi dan Hukum Islam 5 (2): 1-19. Karyaningsih, Ponco Dewi. 2018. Ilmu komunikasi. Yogyakarta: Samudra Biru. Kittay, Eva Feder. 2001. “A feminist public ethic of care meets the new communitarian family policy.” Ethics 111 (3): 523-547. Koentjaraningrat, S. 1997. Metode penelitian masyarakat. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia. Lasinta, Megafirmawanti, Nurmala K. Pandjaitan, and Sarwititi Sarwoprasodjo. 2019. “Struktur jaringan komunikasi dalam membangun perilaku ramah lingkungan (kasus sebuah komunitas padat penduduk di Kota Bogor).” Jurnal Sosilogi Pedesaan 7 (2): 120-126. Latour, Bruno. 2007. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press. Lee, Ming-Hsuan. 2011. “Migration and children's welfare in China: The schooling and health of children left behind.” The Journal of Developing Areas 44 (2): 165-182. Lerner, Richard M. 1995. America′ s Youth in Crisis: Challenges and Options for Programs and Policies. California: Sage Publications. Littlejohn, Stephen W., and Karen A. Foss. 2010. Theories of human communication. Illinois: Waveland press. Martomo, Yitno Puguh. 2020. “Actor Networks Theory Formulasi Kebijakan Penanganan Pengemis, Gelandangan dan Orang Terlantar (PGOT) guna Mendukung Pariwisata Kota Surakarta.” In Optimalisasi potensi masyarakat di era society 5.0 untuk mewujudkan Indonesia maju dan berkarakter edited by Jati Sasongko WIbowo. Semarang: Unisbank Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Mejia, Anilena. 2018. “Communities, Neighborhoods, and Housing.” Handbook of Parenting and Child Development across the Lifespan: 535-550. Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. 2005. Analisis data kualitatif. Translated by Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: UI Press Moleong, Lexy J. 2013. Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Mubarok, Frenky. 2020. “Tradisi Sakral Dan Tradisi Populis Dalam Masyarakat Muslim Di Indramayu.” Living Islam: Journal of Islamic Discourses 3 (2): 291-303. Muhi, Ali Hanapiah. 2011. “Fenomena pembangunan desa.” Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri: ¬1-20 Muhtarom, Abid. 2016. “Peranan lembaga pemberdayaan masyarakat (LPM) dalam pembangunan di desa di Kabupaten Lamongan.” Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi dan Akuntansi 1 (3): 181-204. Nguyen, Cuong Viet. 2016. “Does parental migration really benefit left-behind children? Comparative evidence from Ethiopia, India, Peru and Vietnam.” Social Science & Medicine 153: 230-239. Nuraeni, Yeni. 2018. “Strategi Pengembangan UMKM Berbasis Agroindustri Melalui Program Desa Migran Produktif (Desmigratif) Dalam Rangka Perluasan Kesempatan Kerja.” Jurnal Akuntansi Manajerial (Managerial Accounting Journal) 3 (1): 42-53. . 2021. “Pembangunan Desa Migran Produktif (Desmigratif) Dengan Pendekatan Perencanaan Secara Holistik, Temanik, Integratif, dan Spasial.” Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan 16 (1): 29-47. Oblinger, Diana, and James Oblinger. 2005. “Is it age or iT: first steps toward understanding the net generation.” In Educating the net generation, edited by Diana G. Oblinger and James L. Oblinger, 2 – 20. Boulder, CO: Edu cause. Paat, Yok-Fong. 2013. “Working with immigrant children and their families: An application of Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory.” Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 23 (8): 954-966. Pace, R. Wayne, and Don F. Faules. 2000. Komunikasi Organisasi: Strategi meningkatkan kinerja perusahaan. Translated by Deddy Mulyana. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Palangdao, Channel Dane, et al. 2023. “Youth governance in the selected Barangays of Baguio City, Philippines.” Diversitas Journal 8 (4): 2773-2795. Parreñas, Rhacel Salazar. 2001. “Mothering from a distance: Emotions, gender, and intergenerational relations in Filipino transnational families.” Feminist studies 27 (2): 361-390. . 2005. Children of global migration: Transnational families and gendered woes. California: Stanford University Press. Parson, Wayne. (2011). Public Policy, Pengantar Teori dan Praktik Analisis Kebijakan. Translated by Tri Wibowo Budi Santoso. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group Pertiwi, Luhung Kawuryaning, Anita Febiyanti, and Yeni Rachmawati. 2021. “Keterlibatan orang tua terhadap pembelajaran daring anak usia dini pada masa pandemi covid-19.” Cakrawala Dini: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini 12 (1): 19-30. Puspitasari, Mardiana Dwi, et al. 2020. “Early childhood parenting practices in Indonesia.” Population Review 59 (2): 139-155. Qurniawati, Rina Sari, and Yulfan Arif Nurohman. 2018. “eWOM pada generasi Z di sosial media.” Jurnal Manajemen Dayasaing 20 (2): 70-80. Rachmawati, Yeni. 2020. “Pengembangan Model Etnoparenting Indonesia pada Pengasuhan Anak.” Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini 5 (2): 1150-1162. Riany, Yulina Eva, Pamela Meredith, and Monica Cuskelly. 2017. “Understanding the influence of traditional cultural values on Indonesian parenting.” Marriage & Family Review 53 (3): 207-226. Ritzer, George, and Douglas J. Goodman. 2003. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Translated by Alimandan. Jakarta: Rajawali Perss. Rogers, Everett M., and D. Lawrence Kincaid. 1981. Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press. Sanders, Matthew R. 2000. “Community-based parenting and family support interventions and the prevention of drug abuse.” Addictive behaviors 25 (6): 929-942. Saptono, Nanang. 1995. “Perkembangan Pemukiman Di Daerah Indramayu.” Berkala Arkeologi 15 (3): 60-64. Satrianingrum, Arifah Prima, and Farida Agus Setyawati. 2021. “Perbedaan pola pengasuhan orang tua pada anak usia dini ditinjau dari berbagai suku di indonesia: Kajian literatur.” JIV-Jurnal Ilmiah Visi 16 (1): 25-34. Schwarzenbach, Sibyl A. 1996. “On civic friendship.” Ethics 107 (1): 97-128. Schwieger, Dana, and Christine Ladwig. 2018. “Reaching and retaining the next generation: Adapting to the expectations of Gen Z in the classroom.” Information Systems Education Journal 16 (3): 45. Segrin, Chris, and Jeanne Flora. 2018. Family communication. New York: Routledge. Sibarani, Robert. 2018. “Batak Toba society’s local wisdom of mutual cooperation in Toba Lake area: a linguistic anthropology study.” International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare 11 (1): 40-55. Silviani, Irene. 2020. Komunikasi organisasi. Surabaya: Scopindo Media Pustaka. Solechan, Solechan, Tri Rahayu Utami, and Muhamad Azhar. 2020. “Upaya Meningkatkan Jaminan Perlindungan Pekerja Migran Indonesia.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 3 (1): 153-161. Sumarti, Titik, Ekawati Sri Wahyuni, and Irni Rahmayani Johan. 2022. “Optimalisasi Kesejahteraan Left-behind Children pada Keluarga Pekerja Migran di Pedesaan melalui Penguatan Sistem Keluarga Inti: Sebuah Perspektif dari Sisi Anak.” Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 10 (2): 179-195. Susilo, Singgih. 2016. “Beberapa faktor yang menentukan TKI dalam memilih negara tujuan sebagai tempat bekerja, studi di Desa Aryojeding Kabupaten Tulungagung.” Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi 21 (2): 38 – 46. Taylor, Heather, and Robin Peace. 2015. “Children and cultural influences in a natural disaster: Flood response in Surakarta, Indonesia.” International journal of disaster risk reduction 13: 76-84. Triandis, Harry C. 2019. Individualism and collectivism. New York: Routledge. Tronto, Joan. 2020. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge. Turner, Dana P. 2020. “Sampling Methods in Research Design.” Headache: The Journal of Head & Face Pain 60.1: 8 – 12. Ukhtiyani, Khairah, and Setyabudi Indartono. 2020. “Impacts of Indonesian economic growth: Remittances migrant workers and FDI.” JEJAK: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan 13 (2): 280-291. Umam, Khaerul. 2015. “Akulturasi Islam dan Budaya Lokal pada Masyarakat Agraris (Pengalaman Petani Klutuk di Kabupaten Indramayu).” UNIVERSUM: Jurnal KeIslaman dan Kebudayaan 9 (2): 213-223. Utami, Atika Budhi. 2018. “Analisis jaringan komunikasi kelompok.” In Dynamic Media, Communications, and Culture. Jakarta: President University. Virgoreta, Dyah Ayu. 2015. “Implementasi Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat (Studi Pada Desa Beji Kecamatan Jenu, Kabupaten Tuban).” PhD diss. Brawijaya University. Wahyudi, Ridwan, and Risca Dwi Ambarsari. 2018. Evaluasi Pelayanan Migrasi Ketenagakerjaan Antara Aturan dan Pelaksanaan. Jakarta: Jaringan Buruh Migran. Warastuti, Diah, Yulia Herawati, and Evi Kurniasih. 2021. “Kejadian Pernikahan Usia Dini di Indramayu Tahun 2020.” Jurnal Kesehatan dan Kebidanan (Journal of Health and Midwifery) 10 (2): 1-11. Wickramage, Kolitha, et al. 2015. “Risk of mental health and nutritional problems for left-behind children of international labor migrants.” BMC psychiatry 15: 1-12. Widjaja, H. A. W. 2003. Otonomi Desa: merupakan otonomi yang asli, bulat dan utuh. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Widyarto, Wikan Galuh, and Machsun Rifauddin. 2024. “Problematika anak pekerja migran di Tulungagung dalam perspektif bimbingan dan konseling.” Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling 5 (3): 15. Wilson, William Julius. 1991. “Studying inner-city social dislocations: The challenge of public agenda research: 1990 presidential address.” American Sociological Review 56 (1): 1-14. Wiswanti, Inge Uli, et al. 2020. “Pola asuh dan budaya: Studi komparatif antara masyarakat urban dan masyarakat rural Indonesia.” Jurnal Psikologi Sosial 18 (3): 211-223. Web: Antara news. “Menaker: Desmigratif sediakan layanan pengasuhan bagi anak PMI.” Accessed January 10, 2024. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3877182/menaker-desmigratif-sediakan-layanan-pengasuhan-bagi-anak-pmi. Beritasatu. “Program Desmigratif Selamatkan Warga Desa Kenanga dari Kemiskinan.” Accessed January 12, 2023. https://www.beritasatu.com/ekonomi/470100/program-desmigratif-selamatkan-warga- desa-kenanga-dari-kemiskinan. Beritasatu. “Faktor Ekonomi Tempatkan Indramayu di Peringkat Tertinggi Keempat Kasus Perceraian.” Accessed January 8, 2024. https://www.beritasatu.com/nusantara/1048558/faktor-ekonomi-tempatkan-indramayu-di-peringkat-tertinggi-keempat-kasus-perceraian. Borneo News. “Menaker: Program Desmigratif Dibangun Lewat 4 Pilar untuk Lindungi PMI.” Accessed January 14, 2023. https://www.borneonews.co.id/berita/286392-menaker-program-desmigratif-dibangun- lewat-4-pilar-untuk-lindungi-pmi. Bp2mi. “Penempatan Migran.” Accessed January 11, 2023. https://www.bp2mi.go.id/statistik-penempatan. Indramayu. “Indramayu Raih Penghargaan Indonesia Imigrant Worker Awards Tahun 2022.” Accessed January 11, 2023. https://indramayukab.go.id/indramayu-raih-penghargaan-indonesia-imigrant-worker- awards-tahun-2022/. Indramayu. “Statistik Penduduk Indramayu.” Accessed March 24, 2023. https://indramayukab.go.id/statistik-penduduk- indramayu. Indramayu. “Rata-rata lama sekolah (tahun) 2020-2022.” Accessed May 22, 2023. https://indramayukab.bps.go.id/indicator/26/148/1/rata-rata-lama-sekolah.html. Indramayu. “Harumkan Nama Indramayu, Desa Kenanga Raih Desa Terbaik se-Indonesia.” Accessed June 8, 2023 https://indramayu.times.co.id/news/berita/gmfeu7n7pb/Harumkan-Nama-Indramayu- Desa-Kenanga-Raih-Desa-Terbaik-se-Indonesia. Indramayu. “Indeks Pembangunan Manusia di Kabupaten Indramayu.” Accessed December 23, 2023. https://indramayukab.bps.go.id/subject/26/indeks-pembangunan-manusia.html. Kedesa. “Lingkup Lembaga Kemasyarakatan Desa.” Accessed February 14, 2024. https://kedesa.id/id_ID/wiki/lembaga-kemasyarakatan-lembaga-desa-adat-dan-ketentuan-kekhususan-desa-adat/lingkup-lembaga-kemasyarakatan-desa/. Kompas. “Program Desa Migran Produktif belum Optimal.” Accessed January 12, 2023. https://www.kompas.id/baca/ekonomi/2023/09/24/belum-semua-desa-desmigratif-maju. Kompas. “Anak Pekerja Migran masih Terabaikan.” Accessed March 24, 2023. https://www.kompas.id/baca/dikbud/2021/03/08/anak-pekerja-migran-masih-terabaikan/. Kompas. “Perkawinan Anak di Indramayu turut Picu Perceraian hingga Tengkes.” Accessed 25, March 2023. https://www.kompas.id/baca/nusantara/2023/01/26/perkawinan-anak-di-indramayu-berdampak-pada-perceraian-hingga-tengkes?status=sukses_login&status_login=login. Kompas. “Merajut Asa Anak Pekerja Migran Indonesia.” Accessed January 10, 2024. https://interaktif.kompas.id/baca/merajut-asa-anak-pekerja-migran-indonesia/. Migrant Care. “Migrant Care, Anak Pekerja Migran Rentan Alami Masalah.” Accessed March 24, 2023. https://kbr.id/nasional/07-2022/migrant_care anak_pekerja_migran_rentan_alami_masalah/108843.html. Potensi Desa. “Desa Juntinyuat Miliki Perdes Pemberdayaan dan Perlindungan Pekerja Migran.” Accessed June 8, 2023. https://potensidesa.com/desa-juntinyuat-miliki-perdes-pemberdayaan-dan-perlindungan- pekerja-migran/. Recruitment advisor. “Perjanjian antar Negara (G to G) yang ada tentang Perlindungan Buruh Migran.” Accessed December 26, 2023. https://www.recruitmentadvisor.org/id/law/id/existing-government-government-agreement-protection-migrant-workers. Republika. “Rata-Rata Lama Sekolah Warga Indramayu Hanya 5,9 Tahun.” Accessed May 22, 2023. https://news.republika.co.id/berita/pt8aeu459/ratarata-lama-sekolah-warga-indramayu- hanya-59-tahun. 描述 博士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語博士學位學程(IDAS)
109265507資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109265507 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 林季平 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Ji-Ping Lin en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 韓佳婷 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Chatia Hastasari en_US dc.creator (作者) 韓佳婷 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Hastasari, Chatia en_US dc.date (日期) 2024 en_US dc.date.accessioned 5-八月-2024 12:59:26 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 5-八月-2024 12:59:26 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-八月-2024 12:59:26 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0109265507 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152623 - dc.description (描述) 博士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 亞太研究英語博士學位學程(IDAS) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 109265507 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在探討參與社區養育行動者網絡的組成; 在微觀和中觀層面上實施社區養育的多向照護; 微觀和中觀因素在塑造社區養育的重要性; 實施社區養育的成效與挑戰; 以及形塑社區養育的其他因素. 隨著移工人數不斷增加, 截至 2021年已達到 72, 624人 (BP2MI, 2021), 與父母分離的留守兒童數量亦不斷上升. 此外, 因留守兒童與其代理養育者之間存在著世代差異, 而每一代人所堅持的理想價值觀存在極大的差異化, 所以常導致雙方的溝通隔閡. 然而, 在菲律賓這種溝通障礙可藉由留守家庭的多向照護和來自大家庭的良好支持系統來克服. 與此同時, 良好的社會支持系統對留守兒童的重要性也成為印尼政府的關注焦點. 基於此現象, 本研究運用尤里·布朗芬布倫納 (Bronfenbrenner) 的理論和多向照護的概念來分析社區養育的實施. 通過質性研究方法, 本研究在印德拉瑪育選擇了有代表性的受訪者, 包括村政府, 代理養育者, 移工母親, 留守兒童和社會團體代表. 本研究的結果是: (1) 在社區層面, 參與社區養育行動者的角色並無顯著差異. 然而, 在家庭層面, 留守家庭與非留守家庭的父母角色則有明顯差異. 在非留守家庭中, 父母作為主要教養者, 對於孩子來說仍然扮演著非常重要的角色, 而社區養育行為者僅為輔助作用. 相比之下, 對於留守兒童, 代理養育者, 移工母親和社區養育者的角色相互交織和相輔相成, 因此這些行動者皆可被視為擔任留守兒童的主要養育者; (2) 在留守家庭中, 與社區養育者的互動不僅限於口頭交流, 還包括非語言交流, 如照顧留守兒童. 這些行為滿足了孩子的基本需求, 包括生存, 基本能力和福祉需求; (3) 留守兒童與其微觀系統之間的積極互動成為改善他們在家庭層面上所面臨的照護缺失問題,成為重要的支持因素. 此外, 社區機構行為者在中觀系統層面的互動也是塑造社區養育計劃的重要因素. 因社區機構在每個村莊的計劃中充當支持者和協調者; (4) 早在社區養育計劃實施之前, 社區機構在管理活動方面成功運作, 而成員的自發性使得社區養育在兩個村莊中有效運行. 然而, 該計劃面臨的挑戰包括每個任期村長 (Kuwu) 和社區機構管理層的變更, 以及計畫缺乏定期評估. 可能因此阻礙社區養育計劃的改進或持續性; (5) 村莊社區世代相傳的互助 (gotong royong) 文化在塑造兩個村莊的社區養育方面也起到了重要作用. zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) This research aims to find out the composition actor network involved in community parenting; the implementation of multidirectional care in community parenting at the micro and meso levels; the important of micro and meso elements in shaping community parenting; the effectiveness and the challenges involved in the implementation of community parenting; and other factors involved in shaping community parenting. With the increasing number of migrant labors which reach 72,624 people in 2021 (BP2MI, 2021), there has also been an increase in the number of left behind children who live separately from their migrant parents. In addition, the existence of generational differences between left behind children and their surrogate carers often causes communication gap as each generation is attached to certain ideal values that are very different from one another. However, this communication gap can be overcome in Filipinos left behind families with a good support system from the extended family through multidirectional care. In line with this, the importance of a good social support system for left behind children also becomes the concern of Indonesian government. Based on this phenomenon, this research used Bronfenbrenner's theory and the conceptual of multidirectional care to analyze the implementation of community parenting. By using qualitative approach, the informants in this study which was located in Indramayu, were selected purposively, namely village government; surrogate carer, migrant mother, left behind children, and social group representatives. The results of this research are (1) In terms of actors’ role involved in community parenting, there is no difference in this regard at the community level. However, the differences in the role of parents at the family level are very clear. In non-left behind families, parents as the main actors still have a very big role for their children and community actors only have an additional role. Meanwhile, in left behind children, the roles of surrogate carer, migrant mother, and community actors are intertwined and complement each other; (2) In left behind families, the involvement of community actors who are intertwined and complementary with surrogate carer is not only limited to verbal interactions but also non-verbal interactions such as providing care for left behind children. This action then leads to fulfilling children's basic needs, which consist of basic biological survival, basic capabilities, and basic well-being needs; (3) The interaction between community institution actors at the meso system level is also an important element that can shape the community parenting program, because community institutions here function as supporting elements and facilitator in every village program; (4) the success of each community institution in managing activities in the community long before the community parenting program was implemented and the type of membership in community institutions which is voluntary, made community parenting run effectively in both villages. Meanwhile the challenges of this program are the change of Kuwu and community institution management in each period and the absence of regular evaluations which can hinder the improvement or sustainability of community parenting program; and (5) The culture of gotong royong which has been adopted for generations by village communities in general has also an important role in shaping community parenting in both villages. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Background 1 1.2. Overview of Dissertation 9 Chapter 2. Literature Review 12 2.1. Social Problems faced by Left behind Children in Sending Countries 12 2.2. Care Arrangements: From Nuclear Family to Community 15 2.3. The Ecology of Human Development Theory 17 2.4. The Role of Actor 21 2.5. Communication Network 22 2.6. Multidirectional Care 24 2.7. The Relevance of Theory and Conceptual Frameworks to Community Parenting 27 Chapter 3. Research Methods 29 3.1. Research Question 29 3.2. Field Work Location 30 3.3. Data Collection 30 3.4. Data Sources 32 3.5. Data Validation and Analysis 34 Chapter 4. Indramayu through the Lens of a Migrant Village 36 4.1. Indramayu society 36 4.1.1. Socio economic 38 4.1.2. Religion and Culture 43 4.2. Community Institutions and Organizations in Indramayu 49 4.3. Migrant family from time to time 56 Chapter 5. The Work of Community Parenting 61 5.1. Community Parenting 61 5.1.1. Community 61 5.1.1.1. Kenanga Village 61 5.1.1.2. Juntinyuat Village 82 5.1.2. Family and Surrogate Carer 94 5.1.3. School 104 Chapter 6. Analyses and Findings 108 6.1. Analyses 108 6.1.1. The Composition of Actor Network Involved in Community Parenting 108 6.1.1.1. The Role of Actor 108 6.1.1.2. Communication Network 112 6.1.2. Multidirectional Care in Community Parenting Programs at the Micro and Meso Levels 119 6.1.2.1. Basic Biological Survival Needs 123 6.1.2.2. Basic Capabilities Needs 125 6.1.2.3. Basic Well-being Needs 126 6.1.3. The Importance of Micro and Meso Elementsin Shaping Community Parenting 128 6.1.3.1. Supporting Element in Planning and Implementing Village Programs 130 6.1.3.2. A facilitator for village community empowerment 132 6.1.4. The Effectiveness and the Challenges of Community Parenting 133 6.1.5. Other Factors that are involved in shaping community parenting 137 6.2. Findings 141 6.3. Limitations 143 Chapter 7. Conclusion 145 7.1. Conclusion 145 7.2. Recommendation 147 Bibliography 150 Appendix 160 zh_TW dc.format.extent 6001389 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109265507 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 留守兒童 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社區養育 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 生產性移民村 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 溝通網絡 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 多向照護 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Left behind children en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) community parenting en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) productive migrant villages en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) communication network en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) multidirectional care en_US dc.title (題名) 留守兒童社區育兒計畫：印尼案例研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) COMMUNITY PARENTING PROGRAMS FOR LEFT-BEHIND CHILDREN: A Case Study in Indonesia en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Abrego, Leisy J. 2014. Sacrificing families: Navigating laws, Labor, and Love across Borders. California: Stanford University Press. Anderson, Benedict Richard O'Gorman. 1990. Language and power: Exploring political cultures in Indonesia. New York: Cornell University Press. Ahmadi, Dadi. 2008. “Interaksi simbolik: Suatu pengantar.” Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi 9 (2): 301-316. Akama, Yoko, Susan Chaplin, and Peter Fairbrother. 2014. “Role of Social Networks in Community Preparedness for Bushfire.” International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 5(3): 227–91. Almira, Litha, Lathifah Hanum, and Adhityawarman Menaldi. 2019. “Relationship with children and the psychological well-being of the elderly in Indonesia.” SAGE Open Medicine 7: 1 – 6. Anshor, Maria Ulfah. 2017. Memutus Rantai Ketidakadilan Global Care dalam Pengasuhan Anak Tenaga Kerja Indonesia Perempuan: Studi Pengasuhan Anak TKI Perempuan pada Pesantren di Indramayu. Indonesia: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia. Antman, Francisca M. 2013. “The impact of migration on family left behind.” In International handbook on the economics of migration, edited by Amelie F. Constant and Klaus F. Zimmermann, 293-308. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Asis, Maruja MB. 2006. “Living with migration: Experiences of left-behind children in the Philippines.” Asian population studies 2 (1): 45-67. Biddle, Bruce J. 1986. “Recent developments in role theory.” Annual review of sociology 12 (1): 67-92. Basu, Kaushik, Sanghamitra Das, and Bhaskar Dutta. 2010. “Child labor and household wealth: Theory and empirical evidence of an inverted-U.” Journal of development economics 91 (1): 8-14. Battistella, Graziano, and Ma Cecilia G. Conaco. 1998. “The impact of labour migration on the children left behind: a study of elementary school children in the Philippines.” SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 13 (2): 220-241. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41056988 Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 1979. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. New York: Harvard university press. . 1994. “Ecological models of human development.” International encyclopedia of education 3 (2): 37-43. Chang, Andy Scott. 2021. “Selling a resume and buying a job: Stratification of gender and occupation by states and brokers in international migration from Indonesia.” Social Problems 68 (4): 903-924. Charon, Joel M. 1995. Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Chen, Feinian, Susan E. Short, and Barbara Entwisle. 2000. “The impact of grandparental proximity on maternal childcare in China.” Population Research and Policy Review 19 (6): 571-590. Chotimah, Chusnul, Rohmad Widodo, and Trisakti Handayani. 2019. “Efektivitas Lembaga Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Desa Bululawang.” Jurnal Civic Hukum 4 (2): 103-113. Christiani, Lintang Citra, and Prinisia Nurul Ikasari. 2020. “Generasi Z dan pemeliharaan relasi antar generasi dalam perspektif budaya Jawa.” Jurnal komunikasi dan kajian media 4 (2): 84-105. Clement, Grade. 1996. Care, autonomy, and justice. Boulder: Westview Press. Cuellar, Jessica, Deborah J. Jones, and Emma Sterrett. 2015. “Examining parenting in the neighborhood context: A review.” Journal of Child and Family Studies 24: 195-219. DeVito, Joseph A. 2019. “The interpersonal communication book.” Instructor 1 (18): 521-532. Démurger, Sylvie. 2015. “Migration and families left behind.” IZA World of Labor: 1-9. Engster, Daniel. 2005. “Rethinking care theory: The practice of caring and the obligation to care.” Hypatia 20 (3): 50-74. Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 2000. “The sustainability of welfare states into the twenty-first century.” International Journal of Health Services 30 (1): 1-12. Faisal, Sanapiah. (2003). Format-format penelitian sosial. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. Fitriani, Dian. 2016. “Faktor lingkungan yang memengaruhi pernikahan remaja perempuan.” Jurnal Kesehatan Indra Husada 4 (2): 21-28. Francisco-Menchavez, Valerie. 2018. The labor of care: Filipina migrants and transnational families in the digital age. Chicago: University of Illinois Press. Ge, Yan, et al. 2019. “Studies on left‐behind children in China: Reviewing paradigm shifts.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 163: 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20267 Goodin, Robert E. 1985. Protecting the vulnerable: A re-analysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Graham, Elspeth, et al. 2012. “Transnational families and the family nexus: perspectives of Indonesian and Filipino children left behind by migrant parent (s).” Environment and Planning A 44 (4): 793-815. Grusec, Joan E. 2002. “Parental socialization and children’s acquisition of values.” Handbook of parenting 5 (2): 143-167. Gu, Xiaorong. 2022. “Save the children!: Governing left-behind children through family in China’s Great Migration.” Current sociology 70 (4): 513-538. Romina Guevarra, Anna. 2006. “Managing ‘vulnerabilities’ and ‘empowering’migrant Filipina workers: the Philippines’ Overseas Employment Program.” Social Identities 12 (5): 523-541. Guo, Jing, et al. 2015. “Depression among migrant and left-behind children in China in relation to the quality of parent-child and teacher-child relationships.” PLoS One 10 (12): 1-15 Hariyanto, Fajar. 2017. “Komunikasi Keluarga Orang Tua Berprofesi Tenaga Kerja Indonesia (TKI) Di Kabupaten Karawang.” Jurnal Politikom Indonesiana 2 (2): 177-177. Hoang, Lan Anh, Brenda SA Yeoh, and Anna Marie Wattie. 2012. “Transnational labour migration and the politics of care in the Southeast Asian family.” Geoforum 43 (4): 733-740. Hoang, Lan Anh, et al. 2015. “Transnational migration, changing care arrangements and left-behind children's responses in South-east Asia.” Children's geographies 13 (3): 263-277. Isroji, Isroji, and Agus Moh Najib. 2022. “Peraturan Daerah Bernuansa Syari’ah Di Indramayu Dan Tasikmalaya: Agama, Politik Lokal Dan Ancaman Disintegrasi.” Ulumuddin: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman 12 (2): 247-272. Jin, Feifei, et al. 2021. “Health status of left-behind children and parenting behaviors of caregivers in poor rural areas—6 provinces, China, 2018.” China CDC weekly 3 (3): 54. Johnson, J. David, et al. 1994. “Differences between formal and informal communication channels.” The Journal of Business Communication 31 (2): 111-122. Jubaedi, Siti Umiroh, and Ujang Syafrudin. 2020. “Pengaruh Sosial Budaya Terhadap Pernikahan Di Bawah Umur Di Kecamatan Jatibarang Kabupaten Indramayu.” INKLUSIF: Jurnal Pengkajian Ekonomi dan Hukum Islam 5 (2): 1-19. Karyaningsih, Ponco Dewi. 2018. Ilmu komunikasi. Yogyakarta: Samudra Biru. Kittay, Eva Feder. 2001. “A feminist public ethic of care meets the new communitarian family policy.” Ethics 111 (3): 523-547. Koentjaraningrat, S. 1997. Metode penelitian masyarakat. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia. Lasinta, Megafirmawanti, Nurmala K. Pandjaitan, and Sarwititi Sarwoprasodjo. 2019. “Struktur jaringan komunikasi dalam membangun perilaku ramah lingkungan (kasus sebuah komunitas padat penduduk di Kota Bogor).” Jurnal Sosilogi Pedesaan 7 (2): 120-126. Latour, Bruno. 2007. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press. Lee, Ming-Hsuan. 2011. “Migration and children's welfare in China: The schooling and health of children left behind.” The Journal of Developing Areas 44 (2): 165-182. Lerner, Richard M. 1995. America′ s Youth in Crisis: Challenges and Options for Programs and Policies. California: Sage Publications. Littlejohn, Stephen W., and Karen A. Foss. 2010. Theories of human communication. Illinois: Waveland press. Martomo, Yitno Puguh. 2020. “Actor Networks Theory Formulasi Kebijakan Penanganan Pengemis, Gelandangan dan Orang Terlantar (PGOT) guna Mendukung Pariwisata Kota Surakarta.” In Optimalisasi potensi masyarakat di era society 5.0 untuk mewujudkan Indonesia maju dan berkarakter edited by Jati Sasongko WIbowo. Semarang: Unisbank Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Mejia, Anilena. 2018. “Communities, Neighborhoods, and Housing.” Handbook of Parenting and Child Development across the Lifespan: 535-550. Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. 2005. Analisis data kualitatif. Translated by Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: UI Press Moleong, Lexy J. 2013. Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Mubarok, Frenky. 2020. “Tradisi Sakral Dan Tradisi Populis Dalam Masyarakat Muslim Di Indramayu.” Living Islam: Journal of Islamic Discourses 3 (2): 291-303. Muhi, Ali Hanapiah. 2011. “Fenomena pembangunan desa.” Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri: ¬1-20 Muhtarom, Abid. 2016. “Peranan lembaga pemberdayaan masyarakat (LPM) dalam pembangunan di desa di Kabupaten Lamongan.” Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi dan Akuntansi 1 (3): 181-204. Nguyen, Cuong Viet. 2016. “Does parental migration really benefit left-behind children? Comparative evidence from Ethiopia, India, Peru and Vietnam.” Social Science & Medicine 153: 230-239. Nuraeni, Yeni. 2018. “Strategi Pengembangan UMKM Berbasis Agroindustri Melalui Program Desa Migran Produktif (Desmigratif) Dalam Rangka Perluasan Kesempatan Kerja.” Jurnal Akuntansi Manajerial (Managerial Accounting Journal) 3 (1): 42-53. . 2021. “Pembangunan Desa Migran Produktif (Desmigratif) Dengan Pendekatan Perencanaan Secara Holistik, Temanik, Integratif, dan Spasial.” Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan 16 (1): 29-47. Oblinger, Diana, and James Oblinger. 2005. “Is it age or iT: first steps toward understanding the net generation.” In Educating the net generation, edited by Diana G. Oblinger and James L. Oblinger, 2 – 20. Boulder, CO: Edu cause. Paat, Yok-Fong. 2013. “Working with immigrant children and their families: An application of Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory.” Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 23 (8): 954-966. Pace, R. Wayne, and Don F. Faules. 2000. Komunikasi Organisasi: Strategi meningkatkan kinerja perusahaan. Translated by Deddy Mulyana. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Palangdao, Channel Dane, et al. 2023. “Youth governance in the selected Barangays of Baguio City, Philippines.” Diversitas Journal 8 (4): 2773-2795. Parreñas, Rhacel Salazar. 2001. “Mothering from a distance: Emotions, gender, and intergenerational relations in Filipino transnational families.” Feminist studies 27 (2): 361-390. . 2005. Children of global migration: Transnational families and gendered woes. California: Stanford University Press. Parson, Wayne. (2011). Public Policy, Pengantar Teori dan Praktik Analisis Kebijakan. Translated by Tri Wibowo Budi Santoso. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group Pertiwi, Luhung Kawuryaning, Anita Febiyanti, and Yeni Rachmawati. 2021. “Keterlibatan orang tua terhadap pembelajaran daring anak usia dini pada masa pandemi covid-19.” Cakrawala Dini: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini 12 (1): 19-30. Puspitasari, Mardiana Dwi, et al. 2020. “Early childhood parenting practices in Indonesia.” Population Review 59 (2): 139-155. Qurniawati, Rina Sari, and Yulfan Arif Nurohman. 2018. “eWOM pada generasi Z di sosial media.” Jurnal Manajemen Dayasaing 20 (2): 70-80. Rachmawati, Yeni. 2020. “Pengembangan Model Etnoparenting Indonesia pada Pengasuhan Anak.” Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini 5 (2): 1150-1162. Riany, Yulina Eva, Pamela Meredith, and Monica Cuskelly. 2017. “Understanding the influence of traditional cultural values on Indonesian parenting.” Marriage & Family Review 53 (3): 207-226. Ritzer, George, and Douglas J. Goodman. 2003. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Translated by Alimandan. Jakarta: Rajawali Perss. Rogers, Everett M., and D. Lawrence Kincaid. 1981. Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press. Sanders, Matthew R. 2000. “Community-based parenting and family support interventions and the prevention of drug abuse.” Addictive behaviors 25 (6): 929-942. Saptono, Nanang. 1995. “Perkembangan Pemukiman Di Daerah Indramayu.” Berkala Arkeologi 15 (3): 60-64. Satrianingrum, Arifah Prima, and Farida Agus Setyawati. 2021. “Perbedaan pola pengasuhan orang tua pada anak usia dini ditinjau dari berbagai suku di indonesia: Kajian literatur.” JIV-Jurnal Ilmiah Visi 16 (1): 25-34. Schwarzenbach, Sibyl A. 1996. “On civic friendship.” Ethics 107 (1): 97-128. Schwieger, Dana, and Christine Ladwig. 2018. “Reaching and retaining the next generation: Adapting to the expectations of Gen Z in the classroom.” Information Systems Education Journal 16 (3): 45. Segrin, Chris, and Jeanne Flora. 2018. Family communication. New York: Routledge. Sibarani, Robert. 2018. “Batak Toba society’s local wisdom of mutual cooperation in Toba Lake area: a linguistic anthropology study.” International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare 11 (1): 40-55. Silviani, Irene. 2020. Komunikasi organisasi. Surabaya: Scopindo Media Pustaka. Solechan, Solechan, Tri Rahayu Utami, and Muhamad Azhar. 2020. “Upaya Meningkatkan Jaminan Perlindungan Pekerja Migran Indonesia.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 3 (1): 153-161. Sumarti, Titik, Ekawati Sri Wahyuni, and Irni Rahmayani Johan. 2022. “Optimalisasi Kesejahteraan Left-behind Children pada Keluarga Pekerja Migran di Pedesaan melalui Penguatan Sistem Keluarga Inti: Sebuah Perspektif dari Sisi Anak.” Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 10 (2): 179-195. Susilo, Singgih. 2016. “Beberapa faktor yang menentukan TKI dalam memilih negara tujuan sebagai tempat bekerja, studi di Desa Aryojeding Kabupaten Tulungagung.” Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi 21 (2): 38 – 46. Taylor, Heather, and Robin Peace. 2015. “Children and cultural influences in a natural disaster: Flood response in Surakarta, Indonesia.” International journal of disaster risk reduction 13: 76-84. Triandis, Harry C. 2019. Individualism and collectivism. New York: Routledge. Tronto, Joan. 2020. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge. Turner, Dana P. 2020. “Sampling Methods in Research Design.” Headache: The Journal of Head & Face Pain 60.1: 8 – 12. Ukhtiyani, Khairah, and Setyabudi Indartono. 2020. “Impacts of Indonesian economic growth: Remittances migrant workers and FDI.” JEJAK: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan 13 (2): 280-291. Umam, Khaerul. 2015. “Akulturasi Islam dan Budaya Lokal pada Masyarakat Agraris (Pengalaman Petani Klutuk di Kabupaten Indramayu).” UNIVERSUM: Jurnal KeIslaman dan Kebudayaan 9 (2): 213-223. Utami, Atika Budhi. 2018. “Analisis jaringan komunikasi kelompok.” In Dynamic Media, Communications, and Culture. Jakarta: President University. Virgoreta, Dyah Ayu. 2015. “Implementasi Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat (Studi Pada Desa Beji Kecamatan Jenu, Kabupaten Tuban).” PhD diss. Brawijaya University. Wahyudi, Ridwan, and Risca Dwi Ambarsari. 2018. Evaluasi Pelayanan Migrasi Ketenagakerjaan Antara Aturan dan Pelaksanaan. Jakarta: Jaringan Buruh Migran. Warastuti, Diah, Yulia Herawati, and Evi Kurniasih. 2021. “Kejadian Pernikahan Usia Dini di Indramayu Tahun 2020.” Jurnal Kesehatan dan Kebidanan (Journal of Health and Midwifery) 10 (2): 1-11. Wickramage, Kolitha, et al. 2015. “Risk of mental health and nutritional problems for left-behind children of international labor migrants.” BMC psychiatry 15: 1-12. Widjaja, H. A. W. 2003. Otonomi Desa: merupakan otonomi yang asli, bulat dan utuh. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Widyarto, Wikan Galuh, and Machsun Rifauddin. 2024. “Problematika anak pekerja migran di Tulungagung dalam perspektif bimbingan dan konseling.” Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling 5 (3): 15. Wilson, William Julius. 1991. “Studying inner-city social dislocations: The challenge of public agenda research: 1990 presidential address.” American Sociological Review 56 (1): 1-14. Wiswanti, Inge Uli, et al. 2020. “Pola asuh dan budaya: Studi komparatif antara masyarakat urban dan masyarakat rural Indonesia.” Jurnal Psikologi Sosial 18 (3): 211-223. Web: Antara news. “Menaker: Desmigratif sediakan layanan pengasuhan bagi anak PMI.” Accessed January 10, 2024. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3877182/menaker-desmigratif-sediakan-layanan-pengasuhan-bagi-anak-pmi. Beritasatu. “Program Desmigratif Selamatkan Warga Desa Kenanga dari Kemiskinan.” Accessed January 12, 2023. https://www.beritasatu.com/ekonomi/470100/program-desmigratif-selamatkan-warga- desa-kenanga-dari-kemiskinan. Beritasatu. “Faktor Ekonomi Tempatkan Indramayu di Peringkat Tertinggi Keempat Kasus Perceraian.” Accessed January 8, 2024. https://www.beritasatu.com/nusantara/1048558/faktor-ekonomi-tempatkan-indramayu-di-peringkat-tertinggi-keempat-kasus-perceraian. Borneo News. “Menaker: Program Desmigratif Dibangun Lewat 4 Pilar untuk Lindungi PMI.” Accessed January 14, 2023. https://www.borneonews.co.id/berita/286392-menaker-program-desmigratif-dibangun- lewat-4-pilar-untuk-lindungi-pmi. Bp2mi. “Penempatan Migran.” Accessed January 11, 2023. https://www.bp2mi.go.id/statistik-penempatan. Indramayu. “Indramayu Raih Penghargaan Indonesia Imigrant Worker Awards Tahun 2022.” Accessed January 11, 2023. https://indramayukab.go.id/indramayu-raih-penghargaan-indonesia-imigrant-worker- awards-tahun-2022/. Indramayu. “Statistik Penduduk Indramayu.” Accessed March 24, 2023. https://indramayukab.go.id/statistik-penduduk- indramayu. Indramayu. “Rata-rata lama sekolah (tahun) 2020-2022.” Accessed May 22, 2023. https://indramayukab.bps.go.id/indicator/26/148/1/rata-rata-lama-sekolah.html. Indramayu. “Harumkan Nama Indramayu, Desa Kenanga Raih Desa Terbaik se-Indonesia.” Accessed June 8, 2023 https://indramayu.times.co.id/news/berita/gmfeu7n7pb/Harumkan-Nama-Indramayu- Desa-Kenanga-Raih-Desa-Terbaik-se-Indonesia. Indramayu. “Indeks Pembangunan Manusia di Kabupaten Indramayu.” Accessed December 23, 2023. https://indramayukab.bps.go.id/subject/26/indeks-pembangunan-manusia.html. Kedesa. “Lingkup Lembaga Kemasyarakatan Desa.” Accessed February 14, 2024. https://kedesa.id/id_ID/wiki/lembaga-kemasyarakatan-lembaga-desa-adat-dan-ketentuan-kekhususan-desa-adat/lingkup-lembaga-kemasyarakatan-desa/. Kompas. “Program Desa Migran Produktif belum Optimal.” Accessed January 12, 2023. https://www.kompas.id/baca/ekonomi/2023/09/24/belum-semua-desa-desmigratif-maju. Kompas. “Anak Pekerja Migran masih Terabaikan.” Accessed March 24, 2023. https://www.kompas.id/baca/dikbud/2021/03/08/anak-pekerja-migran-masih-terabaikan/. Kompas. “Perkawinan Anak di Indramayu turut Picu Perceraian hingga Tengkes.” Accessed 25, March 2023. https://www.kompas.id/baca/nusantara/2023/01/26/perkawinan-anak-di-indramayu-berdampak-pada-perceraian-hingga-tengkes?status=sukses_login&status_login=login. Kompas. “Merajut Asa Anak Pekerja Migran Indonesia.” Accessed January 10, 2024. https://interaktif.kompas.id/baca/merajut-asa-anak-pekerja-migran-indonesia/. Migrant Care. “Migrant Care, Anak Pekerja Migran Rentan Alami Masalah.” Accessed March 24, 2023. https://kbr.id/nasional/07-2022/migrant_care anak_pekerja_migran_rentan_alami_masalah/108843.html. Potensi Desa. “Desa Juntinyuat Miliki Perdes Pemberdayaan dan Perlindungan Pekerja Migran.” Accessed June 8, 2023. https://potensidesa.com/desa-juntinyuat-miliki-perdes-pemberdayaan-dan-perlindungan- pekerja-migran/. Recruitment advisor. “Perjanjian antar Negara (G to G) yang ada tentang Perlindungan Buruh Migran.” Accessed December 26, 2023. https://www.recruitmentadvisor.org/id/law/id/existing-government-government-agreement-protection-migrant-workers. Republika. “Rata-Rata Lama Sekolah Warga Indramayu Hanya 5,9 Tahun.” Accessed May 22, 2023. https://news.republika.co.id/berita/pt8aeu459/ratarata-lama-sekolah-warga-indramayu- hanya-59-tahun. zh_TW
