學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 不同繼承型態在農地細碎過程中扮演的角色分析
The Analysis of Inheritance Types on Farmland Fragmentation作者 許淮哲
Hsu, Huai-Che貢獻者 丁秀吟
Ting, Hsiu-Yin
許淮哲
Hsu, Huai-Che關鍵詞 農地細碎
農地繼承
均分繼承
分割繼承
Farmland Fragmentation
Farmland Inheritance
Equal Divided Inheritance
Partition of Inheritance日期 2024 上傳時間 5-八月-2024 14:16:54 (UTC+8) 摘要 探究台灣農地細碎之原因，過去文獻指出，一則基於制度面「耕者有其田」的政策誘導；另則，我國民法關於繼承事件之規定，採全體繼承人當然繼承主義之正式制度規範，以及傳統有土斯有財、多子均分繼承習俗。此外，過去許多國內外文獻皆將農地細碎的矛頭指向多子均分繼承，認為繼承會使農地在世代間遭到不斷的分割，使得農地面積不斷變小。 然而，在面對農地細碎的議題時，過去文獻主要聚焦於農地細碎對於農地利用、農業經營效率等經濟層面的問題，鮮少有人探討繼承與農地細碎兩者之間的關聯。有鑑於過去研究缺乏可靠證據表明繼承與農地細碎之關係，本研究透過長時間的大樣本實證資料，以空間分析及敘事研究之方式進行分析。分析結果顯示不管是分割繼承或一般繼承只要走向多子繼承皆有可能產生面積細碎的影響。然而，從實證資料中可以發現，農地繼承多為分割繼承且單獨繼承取得之農地，占整體資料68%，而農地細碎關係較大的一般繼承且多子繼承農地，僅占整體資料比例7%，使得繼承並非嘉義縣農地細碎的主要原因。除此之外，從空間分析以及相關文獻可以發現，因為鄰近建築用地之農地，在未來有更高的機會變為非農業使用，使得農地具有轉用增值的空間，繼承人普遍繼承意願較高，產生面積細小，產權較為複雜之情形，導致農地細碎地區多集中於鄉村區與都市計畫區周邊。另外，在農地細碎地區中又以一般繼承農地之權利較為分散，鮮少有繼承人之應繼分大於2/3，對於農地之處分與管理影響程度較大。
Previous research pointed out that the causes of farm land fragmentation in Taiwan included policy effects such as "Land to the Tiller", the adoption of all inheritance by civil law, the formal system of inheritance forms, the custom of equally divided inheritance for more than one child, and the prevailing attitude of ‘with land comes wealth’. Additionally, some literatures mentioned that equal divided inheritance led to smaller and smaller size plots across generations. However, past studies primarily focused on the economic impacts of land fragmentation as the efficiency of land use and agriculture production, but rarely examined the relationship between inheritance and land fragmentation. We study if inheritance is a critical role on farmland fragmentation by analyzing the official data from 1998 to 2018. It is found that multiple heirs, no matter with either partition or equal divided inheritance, should be one factor in farmland fragmentation. Nevertheless, the multiple heirs cases are only 15% with partition and 7% with equal divided inheritance. This finding suggests that inheritance might not be the key cause of land fragmentation in Chiayi County. Moreover, spatial analysis and related literature indicate that heirs tend to be influenced by the potential value appreciation of land for future development, leading to smaller plot sizes and more complex ownership patterns near urban planning areas and rural area. In these fragmented regions, equal divided inheritance results in more dispersed land holdings, with few heirs’ holding more than two-thirds of the land share, significantly impacting land management and disposal.參考文獻 1.丁秀吟，2006，「台灣地區農地重劃之角色變遷與展望」，《土地經濟年刊》，17: 31-56。 2.丁秀吟、林子欽與劉佳欣，2021，「農地重劃減緩土地產權細碎化成效之評估—以嘉義縣為例」，《應用經濟論叢》，110：131-162。 3.毛育剛，2002，「 台灣農地保護政策之演變」，《土地問題研究季刊》 1(4): 11-23。 4.毛育剛，2006，「台灣農業發展重要轉捩點的政策含義」，《土地問題研究季刊》，17:2-13。 5.江璧帆，2007，「農地集團化利用治理模式之比較分析」，政治大學研究所碩士論文:台北。 6.李承嘉，2012，《農地與農村發展政策-新農業體制下的轉向》，五南圖書，初版1 刷，p.298。 7.李建德，1990，「再論農業規模經濟」，『爭鳴』4:40－43。 8.阮明淑，2019，「資料敘事分析之概念性框架初探」，圖書館學與資訊科學 ，45 (1):97-125。 9.周羚翔，2014，「應用時空分析方法於環境公害陳情案件之研究」，國立台灣大學理學院地理環境資源學系碩士論文:台北。 10.林志謙，2018，「農地細碎化課題之研究-以宜蘭縣冬山鄉為例」，中國文化大學環境設計學院都市計畫與開發管理學系碩士論文:台 北。 11.林英彥，1976，「農地政策論」，幼獅文化事業公司:台北 12.林國慶，1994，「台灣農地政策分析與政策建議」，《經社法制論叢》，13：15-40。 13.張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧與吳聰敏，2004，「經濟學-理論與實際」，台北:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。 14.莊文忠，2018，「循證的政策制定與資料分析：挑戰與前瞻」，《文官制度季刊》，10(2):1-20。 15.莊文忠，2020，「大數據的政策敘事分析：基本框架與案例演示」，國家文官學院T&D飛訊，268:1-34。 16.莊谷中，2019，「臺灣農地經營規模之探討-以衝突型農村與傳統農業型農村農地產權實證分析為例」，《土地經濟年刊》，30： 1-63。 17.陳維斌、李俊霖、張琪如與王瓊芯，2016，「蘭陽平原農地轉用影響因子分析與空間規劃政策探討:系統方法之引入」，《台灣土地 研究》，19(2):1-35。 18.馮俞璇，2022，「臺北市使用容積增加基地之住宅開發特性分析」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文:台北。 19.溫在弘、劉擇昌與林民浩，2010，「犯罪地圖繪製與熱區分析方法及其應用：以1998-2007年台北市住宅竊盜犯罪為例」，《地理研 究》，52。 20.劉欽泉與蕭景楷，2001，「促進台灣農地使用權流動性之研究」，《農業經濟半年刊》，69：1-29。 21.Ali, F., Parikh, A., & Shah, M. K., 1996, “Measurement of economic efficiency using the behavioral and stochastic cost frontier approach”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 18(3): 271-287. 22.Bauer, P. T., & Basil S. Yamey., 1957, “The Economics of Under-developed Countries”, University of Chicago Press. 23.Bentley, J. W., 1987, “Economic and ecological approaches to land fragmentation: in defense of a much-maligned phenomenon”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 16（1）:31-67. 24.Binns, B. O., 1950, “The Consolidation of Fragmented Agricultural Holdings”, FAO Agricultural Studies 11, Washington. 25.Blarel, B., Hazell, P., Place, F., & Quiggin, J., 1992, “The economics of farm fragmentation: evidence from Ghana and Rwanda”, The World Bank Economic Review, 6(2):233-254. 26.Boliari, N., 2013, “Does land fragmentation affect land productivity? Empirical evidence from Bulgaria”, Reveiew of Agricultural and Environmental Studies, 94-3, pp.273-302. 27.Boliari, N., 2017, “Can partible inheritance explain land fragmentation? The case of Bulgaria”, Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 6(3):334-353. 28.Deininger, K., Savastano, S., & Carletto, C., 2012, “Land fragmentation, cropland abandonment, and land market operation in Albania”, World Development, 40（10）:2108-2122. 29.Demetriou, Demetris, 2013, “The development of an integrated planning and decision support system (IPDSS) for land consolidation”, Springer Science & Business Media. 30.Dhungana, P., 2022, “Farmland fragmentation, problems, and remedies”. 31.Dorner, Peter., 1977, “Land Ownership and Tenure”, In E. R. Duncan, ed., Dimensions in World Food Problems, Ames: Iowa State University Press. 32.Downing, T. E., 1977, “Partible inheritance and land fragmentation in a Oaxaca village”, Human Organization, 235-243. 33.Dykes, B, 2016, “Data storytelling: The essential data science skill everyone needs”, Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/brentdykes/2016/03/31/data-storytelling-the-essential-data-science-skill-everyone-needs/# 79214a7952ad 34.Fleisher, B. and Liu, Y. H., 1992, “Economies of scale, plot size,human capital and productivity in Chinese agriculture”,Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 32(3):112-123. 35.Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M., 2000, “Quantitative geography: perspectives on spatial data analysis: Sage”. 36.Gatterer, M., Leonhardt, H., Morawetz, U., & Salhofer, K., 2022, “Inheritance tradition and farm land fragmentation: evidence from Austria”, Joint Conference DAES and ÖGA: Ljubljana. 37.Hardin, G., 2009, “The tragedy of the commons”, Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 1(3):243-253. 38.Heller, M. A., 1998, “The tragedy of the anticommons: property in the transition from Marx to markets”, Harvard law review, 621-688. 39.Hyodo, S., 1963, "Aspects of Land Consolidation in Japan”, Land Tenure, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. 40.Jabarin, A. S., & Epplin, F. M., 1994, “Impacts of land fragmentation on the cost of producing wheat in the rain-fed region of northern Jordan”, Agricultural Economics, 11(2-3):191-196. 41.Jia, L & Martin, P., 2012, “How land fragmentation affects off-farm labor supply in China: Evidence from household panel data”, GEWISOLA, Halle: Germany. 42.Kawasaki, K., 2010, “The costs and benefits of land fragmentation of rice farms in Japan.”, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 54(4): 509-526. 43.Keeler, M. E., & Skuras, D. G., 1990, “Land fragmentation and consolidation policies in Greek agriculture”, Geography, 75(1):73-76. 44.Kosara, R., & Mackinlay, J., 2013, “Storytelling: The next step for visualization”, Computer, 46(5):44-50. 45.Latruffe, L., & Piet, L., 2014, “Does land fragmentation affect farm performance? A case study from Brittany, France”, Agricultural systems, 129:68-80. 46.Lee, B., Riche, N. H., Isenberg, P., & Carpendale, S., 2015,” More than telling a story: Transforming data into visually shared stories”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 35(5):84-90. 47.Leibenstein, H., 1957, “Economic Backwardness and Economic Growth”, New York: Wiley & Sons. 48.Lipton, M., 1968, “The Theory of the Optimizing Peasant”, Journal of Develop- ment Studies, 4: 327-51. 49.Lorenz, M., 2010, “What is there to learn?”, Data-driven journalism, Retrieved from http://ij7.innovationjournalism.org/ 50.Lupi, G., 2015, “The new aesthetic of data narrative”, In D. Bihanic (Ed.)”, New challenges for data design, London: Springer, 57-88. 51.Lusho, S., & Papa, D. ,1998, “Land fragmentation and consolidation in Albania”, Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, No.25. 52.McCloskey, D. N., 1975, “The persistence of English common fields”, European peasants and their markets: Essays in agrarian economic history, 92-120. 53.McKinnon, R. 1., 1973, “Money, Capital, and Economic Development”, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. 54.McPherson, M. F., 1982, “Land fragmentation: a selected literature review”. 55.Meer, P. V., 1975, “Land Consolidation through Land Fragmentation： Case Studies from Taiwan”, Land Economics, 51（3）： 275-283. 56.Nguyen, Tin, Enjiang Cheng, and Christopher Findlay., 1996, “Land fragmentation and farm productivity in China in the 1990s.”, China Economic Review, 7(2): 169-180. 57.Rahman, S., & Rahman, M., 2009, “Impact of land fragmentation and resource ownership on productivity and efficiency: The case of rice producers in Bangladesh”, Land use policy, 26(1): 95-103. 58.Sargent, F. 0., 1952, “Fragmentation of French Farm Land: Its Nature, Extent, and Causes”, Land Economics 28: 218-29. 59.Schulz, N., Parisi, F., & Depoorter, B., 2002, “Fragmentation in property: Towards a general model”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE, 158(4):594-613. 60.Shoup, D. C., 1970, “The optimal timing of urban land development”, Papers in Regional Science, 25(1):33-44. 61.Tan, S., Heerink, N., Kruseman, G. & Qu, F., 2008, “Do fragmented landholdings have higher production costs? Evidence from rice farmers in Northeastern Jiangxi province, PR China”, China Economic Review, 19(3):347-358. 62.Thirsk, J., 1964, "The Common Fields”, Past and Present 29:3-25. 63.Wan, G., & Cheng, E., 2001, “Effects of land fragmentation and returns to scale in the Chinese farming sector”, Applied Economics, 33:183–194. 64.Wong, D.W.-S., & Lee, J., 2005, “Statistical analysis of geographic information with ArcView GIS and Arcgis: John Wiley & Sons Hoboken”, NJ, USA. 65.Wu, Z., Liu, M., & Davis, J., 2005, “Land consolidation and productivity in Chinese household crop production”, China Economic Review, 16(1): 28-49. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系
111257030資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111257030 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 丁秀吟 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Ting, Hsiu-Yin en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 許淮哲 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Hsu, Huai-Che en_US dc.creator (作者) 許淮哲 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Hsu, Huai-Che en_US dc.date (日期) 2024 en_US dc.date.accessioned 5-八月-2024 14:16:54 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 5-八月-2024 14:16:54 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-八月-2024 14:16:54 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0111257030 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152835 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 地政學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 111257030 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 探究台灣農地細碎之原因，過去文獻指出，一則基於制度面「耕者有其田」的政策誘導；另則，我國民法關於繼承事件之規定，採全體繼承人當然繼承主義之正式制度規範，以及傳統有土斯有財、多子均分繼承習俗。此外，過去許多國內外文獻皆將農地細碎的矛頭指向多子均分繼承，認為繼承會使農地在世代間遭到不斷的分割，使得農地面積不斷變小。 然而，在面對農地細碎的議題時，過去文獻主要聚焦於農地細碎對於農地利用、農業經營效率等經濟層面的問題，鮮少有人探討繼承與農地細碎兩者之間的關聯。有鑑於過去研究缺乏可靠證據表明繼承與農地細碎之關係，本研究透過長時間的大樣本實證資料，以空間分析及敘事研究之方式進行分析。分析結果顯示不管是分割繼承或一般繼承只要走向多子繼承皆有可能產生面積細碎的影響。然而，從實證資料中可以發現，農地繼承多為分割繼承且單獨繼承取得之農地，占整體資料68%，而農地細碎關係較大的一般繼承且多子繼承農地，僅占整體資料比例7%，使得繼承並非嘉義縣農地細碎的主要原因。除此之外，從空間分析以及相關文獻可以發現，因為鄰近建築用地之農地，在未來有更高的機會變為非農業使用，使得農地具有轉用增值的空間，繼承人普遍繼承意願較高，產生面積細小，產權較為複雜之情形，導致農地細碎地區多集中於鄉村區與都市計畫區周邊。另外，在農地細碎地區中又以一般繼承農地之權利較為分散，鮮少有繼承人之應繼分大於2/3，對於農地之處分與管理影響程度較大。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Previous research pointed out that the causes of farm land fragmentation in Taiwan included policy effects such as "Land to the Tiller", the adoption of all inheritance by civil law, the formal system of inheritance forms, the custom of equally divided inheritance for more than one child, and the prevailing attitude of ‘with land comes wealth’. Additionally, some literatures mentioned that equal divided inheritance led to smaller and smaller size plots across generations. However, past studies primarily focused on the economic impacts of land fragmentation as the efficiency of land use and agriculture production, but rarely examined the relationship between inheritance and land fragmentation. We study if inheritance is a critical role on farmland fragmentation by analyzing the official data from 1998 to 2018. It is found that multiple heirs, no matter with either partition or equal divided inheritance, should be one factor in farmland fragmentation. Nevertheless, the multiple heirs cases are only 15% with partition and 7% with equal divided inheritance. This finding suggests that inheritance might not be the key cause of land fragmentation in Chiayi County. Moreover, spatial analysis and related literature indicate that heirs tend to be influenced by the potential value appreciation of land for future development, leading to smaller plot sizes and more complex ownership patterns near urban planning areas and rural area. In these fragmented regions, equal divided inheritance results in more dispersed land holdings, with few heirs’ holding more than two-thirds of the land share, significantly impacting land management and disposal. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與研究目的 1 第二節 研究內容與方法 8 第三節 研究架構與流程 10 第二章 文獻回顧 13 第一節 農地細碎化之成因及其影響 13 第二節 台灣農地細碎之原委與困境 20 第三節 小結 24 第三章 研究設計與資料處理 27 第一節 資料說明 27 第二節 資料初步分析 35 第三節 研究設計 42 第四章 繼承與農地細碎關聯性之探討 47 第一節 不同繼承型態下農地面積分析 47 第二節 嘉義縣農地細碎空間分析 51 第三節 農地細碎與農地處分、管理之關聯性 63 第五章 結論 67 參考文獻 73 附錄 79 zh_TW dc.format.extent 3643644 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111257030 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 農地細碎 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 農地繼承 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 均分繼承 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 分割繼承 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Farmland Fragmentation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Farmland Inheritance en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Equal Divided Inheritance en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Partition of Inheritance en_US dc.title (題名) 不同繼承型態在農地細碎過程中扮演的角色分析 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Analysis of Inheritance Types on Farmland Fragmentation en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.丁秀吟，2006，「台灣地區農地重劃之角色變遷與展望」，《土地經濟年刊》，17: 31-56。 2.丁秀吟、林子欽與劉佳欣，2021，「農地重劃減緩土地產權細碎化成效之評估—以嘉義縣為例」，《應用經濟論叢》，110：131-162。 3.毛育剛，2002，「 台灣農地保護政策之演變」，《土地問題研究季刊》 1(4): 11-23。 4.毛育剛，2006，「台灣農業發展重要轉捩點的政策含義」，《土地問題研究季刊》，17:2-13。 5.江璧帆，2007，「農地集團化利用治理模式之比較分析」，政治大學研究所碩士論文:台北。 6.李承嘉，2012，《農地與農村發展政策-新農業體制下的轉向》，五南圖書，初版1 刷，p.298。 7.李建德，1990，「再論農業規模經濟」，『爭鳴』4:40－43。 8.阮明淑，2019，「資料敘事分析之概念性框架初探」，圖書館學與資訊科學 ，45 (1):97-125。 9.周羚翔，2014，「應用時空分析方法於環境公害陳情案件之研究」，國立台灣大學理學院地理環境資源學系碩士論文:台北。 10.林志謙，2018，「農地細碎化課題之研究-以宜蘭縣冬山鄉為例」，中國文化大學環境設計學院都市計畫與開發管理學系碩士論文:台 北。 11.林英彥，1976，「農地政策論」，幼獅文化事業公司:台北 12.林國慶，1994，「台灣農地政策分析與政策建議」，《經社法制論叢》，13：15-40。 13.張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧與吳聰敏，2004，「經濟學-理論與實際」，台北:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。 14.莊文忠，2018，「循證的政策制定與資料分析：挑戰與前瞻」，《文官制度季刊》，10(2):1-20。 15.莊文忠，2020，「大數據的政策敘事分析：基本框架與案例演示」，國家文官學院T&D飛訊，268:1-34。 16.莊谷中，2019，「臺灣農地經營規模之探討-以衝突型農村與傳統農業型農村農地產權實證分析為例」，《土地經濟年刊》，30： 1-63。 17.陳維斌、李俊霖、張琪如與王瓊芯，2016，「蘭陽平原農地轉用影響因子分析與空間規劃政策探討:系統方法之引入」，《台灣土地 研究》，19(2):1-35。 18.馮俞璇，2022，「臺北市使用容積增加基地之住宅開發特性分析」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文:台北。 19.溫在弘、劉擇昌與林民浩，2010，「犯罪地圖繪製與熱區分析方法及其應用：以1998-2007年台北市住宅竊盜犯罪為例」，《地理研 究》，52。 20.劉欽泉與蕭景楷，2001，「促進台灣農地使用權流動性之研究」，《農業經濟半年刊》，69：1-29。 21.Ali, F., Parikh, A., & Shah, M. K., 1996, “Measurement of economic efficiency using the behavioral and stochastic cost frontier approach”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 18(3): 271-287. 22.Bauer, P. T., & Basil S. Yamey., 1957, “The Economics of Under-developed Countries”, University of Chicago Press. 23.Bentley, J. W., 1987, “Economic and ecological approaches to land fragmentation: in defense of a much-maligned phenomenon”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 16（1）:31-67. 24.Binns, B. O., 1950, “The Consolidation of Fragmented Agricultural Holdings”, FAO Agricultural Studies 11, Washington. 25.Blarel, B., Hazell, P., Place, F., & Quiggin, J., 1992, “The economics of farm fragmentation: evidence from Ghana and Rwanda”, The World Bank Economic Review, 6(2):233-254. 26.Boliari, N., 2013, “Does land fragmentation affect land productivity? Empirical evidence from Bulgaria”, Reveiew of Agricultural and Environmental Studies, 94-3, pp.273-302. 27.Boliari, N., 2017, “Can partible inheritance explain land fragmentation? The case of Bulgaria”, Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 6(3):334-353. 28.Deininger, K., Savastano, S., & Carletto, C., 2012, “Land fragmentation, cropland abandonment, and land market operation in Albania”, World Development, 40（10）:2108-2122. 29.Demetriou, Demetris, 2013, “The development of an integrated planning and decision support system (IPDSS) for land consolidation”, Springer Science & Business Media. 30.Dhungana, P., 2022, “Farmland fragmentation, problems, and remedies”. 31.Dorner, Peter., 1977, “Land Ownership and Tenure”, In E. R. Duncan, ed., Dimensions in World Food Problems, Ames: Iowa State University Press. 32.Downing, T. E., 1977, “Partible inheritance and land fragmentation in a Oaxaca village”, Human Organization, 235-243. 33.Dykes, B, 2016, “Data storytelling: The essential data science skill everyone needs”, Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/brentdykes/2016/03/31/data-storytelling-the-essential-data-science-skill-everyone-needs/# 79214a7952ad 34.Fleisher, B. and Liu, Y. H., 1992, “Economies of scale, plot size,human capital and productivity in Chinese agriculture”,Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 32(3):112-123. 35.Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M., 2000, “Quantitative geography: perspectives on spatial data analysis: Sage”. 36.Gatterer, M., Leonhardt, H., Morawetz, U., & Salhofer, K., 2022, “Inheritance tradition and farm land fragmentation: evidence from Austria”, Joint Conference DAES and ÖGA: Ljubljana. 37.Hardin, G., 2009, “The tragedy of the commons”, Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 1(3):243-253. 38.Heller, M. A., 1998, “The tragedy of the anticommons: property in the transition from Marx to markets”, Harvard law review, 621-688. 39.Hyodo, S., 1963, "Aspects of Land Consolidation in Japan”, Land Tenure, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. 40.Jabarin, A. S., & Epplin, F. M., 1994, “Impacts of land fragmentation on the cost of producing wheat in the rain-fed region of northern Jordan”, Agricultural Economics, 11(2-3):191-196. 41.Jia, L & Martin, P., 2012, “How land fragmentation affects off-farm labor supply in China: Evidence from household panel data”, GEWISOLA, Halle: Germany. 42.Kawasaki, K., 2010, “The costs and benefits of land fragmentation of rice farms in Japan.”, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 54(4): 509-526. 43.Keeler, M. E., & Skuras, D. G., 1990, “Land fragmentation and consolidation policies in Greek agriculture”, Geography, 75(1):73-76. 44.Kosara, R., & Mackinlay, J., 2013, “Storytelling: The next step for visualization”, Computer, 46(5):44-50. 45.Latruffe, L., & Piet, L., 2014, “Does land fragmentation affect farm performance? A case study from Brittany, France”, Agricultural systems, 129:68-80. 46.Lee, B., Riche, N. H., Isenberg, P., & Carpendale, S., 2015,” More than telling a story: Transforming data into visually shared stories”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 35(5):84-90. 47.Leibenstein, H., 1957, “Economic Backwardness and Economic Growth”, New York: Wiley & Sons. 48.Lipton, M., 1968, “The Theory of the Optimizing Peasant”, Journal of Develop- ment Studies, 4: 327-51. 49.Lorenz, M., 2010, “What is there to learn?”, Data-driven journalism, Retrieved from http://ij7.innovationjournalism.org/ 50.Lupi, G., 2015, “The new aesthetic of data narrative”, In D. Bihanic (Ed.)”, New challenges for data design, London: Springer, 57-88. 51.Lusho, S., & Papa, D. ,1998, “Land fragmentation and consolidation in Albania”, Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, No.25. 52.McCloskey, D. N., 1975, “The persistence of English common fields”, European peasants and their markets: Essays in agrarian economic history, 92-120. 53.McKinnon, R. 1., 1973, “Money, Capital, and Economic Development”, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. 54.McPherson, M. F., 1982, “Land fragmentation: a selected literature review”. 55.Meer, P. V., 1975, “Land Consolidation through Land Fragmentation： Case Studies from Taiwan”, Land Economics, 51（3）： 275-283. 56.Nguyen, Tin, Enjiang Cheng, and Christopher Findlay., 1996, “Land fragmentation and farm productivity in China in the 1990s.”, China Economic Review, 7(2): 169-180. 57.Rahman, S., & Rahman, M., 2009, “Impact of land fragmentation and resource ownership on productivity and efficiency: The case of rice producers in Bangladesh”, Land use policy, 26(1): 95-103. 58.Sargent, F. 0., 1952, “Fragmentation of French Farm Land: Its Nature, Extent, and Causes”, Land Economics 28: 218-29. 59.Schulz, N., Parisi, F., & Depoorter, B., 2002, “Fragmentation in property: Towards a general model”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE, 158(4):594-613. 60.Shoup, D. C., 1970, “The optimal timing of urban land development”, Papers in Regional Science, 25(1):33-44. 61.Tan, S., Heerink, N., Kruseman, G. & Qu, F., 2008, “Do fragmented landholdings have higher production costs? Evidence from rice farmers in Northeastern Jiangxi province, PR China”, China Economic Review, 19(3):347-358. 62.Thirsk, J., 1964, "The Common Fields”, Past and Present 29:3-25. 63.Wan, G., & Cheng, E., 2001, “Effects of land fragmentation and returns to scale in the Chinese farming sector”, Applied Economics, 33:183–194. 64.Wong, D.W.-S., & Lee, J., 2005, “Statistical analysis of geographic information with ArcView GIS and Arcgis: John Wiley & Sons Hoboken”, NJ, USA. 65.Wu, Z., Liu, M., & Davis, J., 2005, “Land consolidation and productivity in Chinese household crop production”, China Economic Review, 16(1): 28-49. zh_TW
