學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 貪腐對地方首長施政滿意度之影響–以臺灣各縣市為例
The Effect of Corruption on Local Chiefs’ Satisfaction with Governance - Evidence from Counties and Cities in Taiwan作者 湯傑閔
Tang, Chieh-Min貢獻者 黃智聰
Huang, Jr-Tsung
湯傑閔
Tang, Chieh-Min關鍵詞 施政滿意度
貪腐
動態空間自相關迴歸模型
Governance Satisfaction
Corruption
Generalized Method of Moments日期 2024 上傳時間 5-八月-2024 14:43:36 (UTC+8) 摘要 時下諸如「某市長涉詐領助理費遭起訴」、「某縣長及多位處長涉洗錢遭起訴」或是「某議員詐領助理費依共同犯使公務員登載不實罪判刑」等臺灣貪污時事頻傳，政府官員相關弊案可謂層出不窮，而地方首長協同公務人員涉貪行為亦可能造成地方首長施政滿意度評價降低，故本文欲探討公務人員貪腐起訴人數比率及其他因素對於地方首長施政滿意度之影響效果。 本研究納入地區公務人員貪腐起訴比率之解釋變數，彙總2011年至2022年天下雜誌臺灣20縣市施政滿意度的追蹤資料（Panel Data），並運用GMM動態追蹤計量模型 （Generalized Method of Moments）作為本文的空間計量實證模型分析工具。本研究將空間計量模型之空間權重矩陣建立於臺灣縣市之間自相關性上，將其轉換為「同儕相依矩陣」。透過動態空間自相關迴歸模型實證估計結果發現，公務人員貪腐起訴人數比例會對地方首長施政滿意度產生負向影響。在施政滿意度空間自相關部分，公務人員貪腐起訴人數比例會對地方首長施政滿意度產生負向影響。在施政滿意度空間自相關部分，地方政府施政滿意度現象呈現顯著正向空間自相關的情形，而施政滿意度則是會對施政滿意度產生顯著正向影響。最後，實質政府支出等變數則會對臺灣各縣市長施政滿意度產生顯著正向影響，而所得不均程度則對施政滿意度產生顯著負向影響。
Recently, several news, such as “The mayor was prosecuted for fraudulently collecting assistant fees”, “The mayor and several department directors were prosecuted for money laundering”, “Council Member of Taiwan were sentenced for fraudulently collecting assistant fees and being guilty of causing civil servants to publish falsehoods”, etc. imply that corruption is a common occurrence, and there are endless cases of corruption involving government officials. Corruption-related actions by local heads and public servants may also lead to a decline in the performance evaluation of local heads. Therefore, this article intends to explore the number of civil servants prosecuted for corruption and other factors that influence the satisfaction of local heads with policy. The effect of the impact. This study includes explanatory variables for the corruption prosecution rate of regional public servants, summarizes the Panel Data of governance satisfaction in 20 counties and cities in Taiwan from 2011 to 2022, and uses the Generalized Method of Moments as a spatial econometric empirical model analysis tool for this article. This study builds the spatial weight matrix of the spatial econometric model on the autocorrelation of peer Taiwan counties and cities, and converts it into a “peer dependence matrix”. Through the empirical estimation results of the dynamic spatial autocorrelation regression model, it is found that the proportion of the number of public officials prosecuted for corruption will have a negative impact on the satisfaction of county and city heads with their governance. As for the spatial autocorrelation phenomenon of governance satisfaction, the phenomenon of local government governance satisfaction shows significant positive spatial autocorrelation results. Finally, this article also found that variables such as expenditures by county and city governments have a significant positive impact on the governance satisfaction of county and mayors in Taiwan. The gap between rich and poor have a significant negative impact on governance satisfaction.參考文獻 王政（2009），「如何消除貪污─四種途徑之分析」。《文官制度季刊》，1，頁51-76。 包正豪（2013），「選舉競爭、政治賦權與原住民投票參與」。《臺灣原住民族研究季刊》，6（4），頁77-117。 李仁耀（2021），《110 年度「市政建設與市政滿意度之研究-以縣市合併十年基礎建設為例」》。高雄市：高雄市政府研考會專題研究計畫。 林啟耀（2011），「票房良藥或毒藥？探討馬政府施政滿意度對立委補選之影響」。《選舉研究》，18（2），頁31-57。 孟維德、蔡田木、劉至剛（2010），「公務員貪瀆犯罪原因及預警機制之研究」。Law Enforcement Review，6（2），頁27-57。 邱靖鈜（2009），「貪腐防制處方：政策工具觀」。《文官制度季刊》。頁179-207。 耿曙、劉嘉薇、陳陸輝（2009），「打破維持現狀的迷思：臺灣民眾統獨抉擇中理念與務實的兩難」。《臺灣政治學刊》，13（2），頁 3-56。 彭錦鵬、李俊達（2014），「影響主觀幸福感因素之研究」。發表於「2014 臺灣政治學會年會國際學術研討會，2014年12月6日，臺北市：國立臺灣大學社會科學院。 黃國敏（2004），「臺灣桃竹苗地區政策民意與施政滿意度之比較」。《香港社會科學學報》，28，頁83-115。 黃國敏（2007），「地方政府施政滿意度之探討：苗栗縣政府九十四年個案研究」。《中華人文社會學報》，6，頁10-42。 廖益興（2009），「民眾是理性還是感性?新竹市政府2005年施政滿意度調查之個案分析」。《選舉評論》，6，頁55-75。 廖興中、徐明莉（2017），「臺灣地方政府貪腐現象之時空掃描」。《公共行政學報》，53，頁1-23。 劉正山（2013），《民眾對地方政府施政滿意度影響成因之研究》。臺北市：行政院國家發展委員會專題計畫。 蔡昌言（2010），「行政首長施政滿意度的影響性分析」。《政治學報》，49，頁 41-69。 蕭怡靖、游清鑫（2006），「施政表現與投票抉擇的南北差異－2006年北高市長選舉的探討」。《臺灣民主季刊》，5（2），頁1-25。 謝俊義（2015），「探索縣市首長施政滿意度與城市競爭力的前導因素與因果關係」。收錄於謝俊義，《地方與都市治理的政策與管理：循證基礎觀點》，第五章，頁122-146。臺北市：五南出版社。 Acar, U. and A. Tİrgİl (2023), “Public Expenditures and Life Satisfaction: Evidence from Turkey.” The Developing Economies, 6(1), 36–56. Aidt, T.S. (2009), “Corruption, Institutions, and Economic Development.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(2), 271–291. Anderson, E.W. (1995), “Rational and Adaptive Performance Expectations in a Customer Satisfaction Framework.” Journal of Consumer Research, 21(4), 695–707. Anderson, C.J. and Y.V. Tverdova (2003), “Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes Toward Government in Contemporary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91–109. Anderson, T.W. and C. Hsiao (1982), “Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models Using Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics, 18(1), 47–82. Arellano, M. and S. Bond (1991), “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. Avellaneda, C.N. (2009), “Mayoral Quality and Local Public Finance.” Public Administration Review, 69(3), 469–486. Avellaneda, C.N. and R.C. Gomes (2017), “Mayoral Quality and Municipal Performance in Brazilian Local Governments.” Organizações & Sociedade , 24(83), 555–579. Avellaneda, C.N., R.A. Gomes, and R.C. Gomes (2022), “Municipal Fiscal Performance: Mayors’ Gender and Organizational Human Resources.” Journal of Policy Studies, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.52372/jps37303. Baltagi, B.H., B. Fingleton, and A. Pirotte (2014), “Estimating and Forecasting with a Dynamic Spatial Panel Data Model.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 76, 112–136. Bjørnskov, C. (2010), “How Comparable Are the Gallup World Poll Life Satisfaction Data?” Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 41–60. Bjørnskov, C., A. Dreher, and J. A.V. Fischer (2007), “The Bigger the Better? Evidence of the Effect of Government Size on Life Satisfaction around the World.” Public Choice, 130, 267–292. Blais, A. (2000), To Vote or Not to Vote?: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjrrf. Blundell, R. and S. Bond (1998), “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. Blundell, R. and S. Bond (2023), “Initial Conditions and Blundell–Bond Estimators.” Journal of Econometrics, 234, 101–110. Bond, S.R. (2002), “Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice.” Portuguese Economic Journal, 1, 141–162. Ciziceno, M. and G.A. Travaglino (2019), “Perceived Corruption and Individuals’ Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Institutional Trust.” Social Indicators Research, 141, 685–701. Dahlberg, M. and E. Johansson (2002), “On the Vote-Purchasing Behavior of Incumbent Governments.” American Political Science Review, 96(1), 27–40. Downs, A. (1957), “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 130–150. Elhorst, J.P. (2012), “Dynamic Spatial Panels: Models, Methods, and Inferences.” Journal of Geographical Systems, 14, 5–28. Ergan, S., A. Akyol, and D. Kucukaltan (2014), “The Effect of City Branding and Its Components on Resident Satisfaction.” Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 1(2), 82–97. Flavin, P., A.C. Pacek, and B. Radcliff (2011), “State Intervention and Subjective Well-Being in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” Politics & Policy, 39(2), 251–269. Flavin, P. (2019), “State Government Public Goods Spending and Citizens' Quality of Life.” Social Science Research, 78, 28–40. Fu, Y. (2017), “The Value of Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Chinese Anti-Corruption Campaign.” The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 47, 461–476. Gray, C.W. and D. Kaufman (1998), “Corruption and Development.” Finance & Development, March 1998, 7–10. Grosjean, P. and C. Senik (2011), “Democracy, Market Liberalization, and Political Preferences.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 365–381. Habibov, N., L. Fan, and A. Auchynnikava (2017), “Explaining Support for Structural Attribution of Poverty in Post-Communist Countries: Multilevel Analysis of Repeated Cross-Sectional Data.” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 44 (3), 173–197. Habibov, N., L. Fan, and A. Auchynnikava (2019), “The Effects of Corruption on Satisfaction with Local and National Governments. Does Corruption ‘Grease the Wheels’?” Europe-Asia Studies, 71(5), 736–752. Harmel, R. and Y. Yeh (2011), “Corruption and Government Satisfaction in Authoritarian Regimes: The Case of China.” APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1899973. Jain, A.K. (2001), “Corruption: A Review.” Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1), 71–121. Jonck, P. and E. Swanepoel (2016), “The Influence of Corruption: A South African Case.” Policing: An International Journal, 39(1), 159–174. Justesen, M. and C. Bjørnskov (2014), “Exploiting the Poor: Bureaucratic Corruption and Poverty in Africa.” World Development, 58, 106–115. Khemani, S. (2015), “Buying Votes versus Supplying Public Services: Political Incentives to Under-Invest in Pro-Poor Policies.” Journal of Development Economics, 117, 84–93. Lovrich, N.P. and G.T. Taylor (1976), “Neighborhood Evaluation of Local Government Services.” Urban Affairs Review, 12(2), 197–222. Ma, J., B. Guo, and Y. Yu (2022), “Perception of Official Corruption, Satisfaction with Government Performance, and Subjective Wellbeing—An Empirical Study From China.” Comparative Political Studies, 41(12), 1607–1630. Milbrath, L.W. and M.L. Goel (1977), “Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics?” Politics and Gender, 7(3), 365–390. Mishra, S.S. and M.M. Abdullahi (2020), ”Citizens’ Satisfaction with Government in a Highly Corrupt Public Life: Role of Trust in Democracy and Civil Society Participation in Somalia.” Journal of Asian and African Studies, 55(5), 762–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909619900193. Mouritzhen, P.E. (1989), ”City Size and Citizens’ Satisfaction: Two Competing Theories Revisited European.” Journal of Political Research, 17(6), 661–688. Mueller, J.E. (1970), ”Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson.” The American Political Science Review, 64(1), 18–34. Muñoz, T.M.G., J.M. Baleix, and O.O. Odeh (2019), “Inequality in Latin America: The Role of the Nature of Trade and Partners.” Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 14 (2020-25): 1–35. DOI:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2020-25. Nargesian, A., G. Jamali, M. Harati, and H. Azari (2018), “Investigating the Relationship between Corruption and Trust Related to Transparency and Citizen Satisfaction.” Journal of Public Administration, 10(2), 289–310. Nigro, H.O. and S.E.G. Císaro (2016), “The Citizen Satisfaction Index: Adapting the Model in Argentine Cities.” Cities, 56, 85–90. Nigro, H.O. and S.E.G. Císaro (2020), “Activity-based Travel as a social Signal of the City Satisfaction Index. Study Case in a Medium-sized City of Argentina.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 7. Article 100207. DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100207. Ovaska, T. and R. Takashima (2006), “Economic Policy and The Level of Self-Perceived Well-Being: An International Comparison.” The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 308–325. Park, H. and J. Blenkinsopp (2011), “The Roles of Transparency and Trust in the Relationship between Corruption and Citizen Satisfaction.” International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 254–274. Ram, R. (2009), “Government Spending and Happiness of the Population: Additional Evidence from Large Cross-country Samples.” Public Choice, 138(3), 483–490. Roodman, D. (2006), “How to Do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata.” Sage Journal, 9(1), 88–136. Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1997), “Corruption and Development.” Paper Presented in the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, April 30-May 1, 1997. Washington D.C.: The World Bank. Salim, M., X. Peng, S. Almaktary, and S. Karmoshi (2017), “The Impact of Citizen Satisfaction with Government Performance on Public Trust in the Government: Empirical Evidence from Urban Yemen.” Open Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 348–365. Tanzi, V. and H. Davoodi (1998), “Corruption, Public Investment, and Growth.” In H. Shibata and T. Ihori (eds), The Welfare State, Public Investment, and Growth. Tokyo: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-67939-4_4. Tavits, M. (2008), “On the Linkage between Electoral Volatility and Party System Instability in Central and Eastern Europe.” European Journal of Political Research, 47(5), 537–555. Welsch, H. (2008), “The Welfare Costs of Corruption.” Applied Economics, 40(14), 1839–1849. Winkelmann, L. and R. Winkelmann (2003), “Personality, Work, and Satisfaction: Evidence from the German Socio-Economic Panel.” The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 266–275. York, R. and S.E. Bell (2014), “Life Satisfaction across Nations: The Effects of Women's Political Status and Public Priorities.” Social Science Research, 48, 48–61. Zhang, B., Y. Le, B. Xia, and M. Skitmore (2016), “Causes of Business-to-Government Corruption in the Tendering Process in China.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(2). Article 05016022. https://doi.org/ 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000479. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
110255024資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110255024 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 黃智聰 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Huang, Jr-Tsung en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 湯傑閔 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Tang, Chieh-Min en_US dc.creator (作者) 湯傑閔 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Tang, Chieh-Min en_US dc.date (日期) 2024 en_US dc.date.accessioned 5-八月-2024 14:43:36 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 5-八月-2024 14:43:36 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-八月-2024 14:43:36 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0110255024 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152899 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 財政學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 110255024 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 時下諸如「某市長涉詐領助理費遭起訴」、「某縣長及多位處長涉洗錢遭起訴」或是「某議員詐領助理費依共同犯使公務員登載不實罪判刑」等臺灣貪污時事頻傳，政府官員相關弊案可謂層出不窮，而地方首長協同公務人員涉貪行為亦可能造成地方首長施政滿意度評價降低，故本文欲探討公務人員貪腐起訴人數比率及其他因素對於地方首長施政滿意度之影響效果。 本研究納入地區公務人員貪腐起訴比率之解釋變數，彙總2011年至2022年天下雜誌臺灣20縣市施政滿意度的追蹤資料（Panel Data），並運用GMM動態追蹤計量模型 （Generalized Method of Moments）作為本文的空間計量實證模型分析工具。本研究將空間計量模型之空間權重矩陣建立於臺灣縣市之間自相關性上，將其轉換為「同儕相依矩陣」。透過動態空間自相關迴歸模型實證估計結果發現，公務人員貪腐起訴人數比例會對地方首長施政滿意度產生負向影響。在施政滿意度空間自相關部分，公務人員貪腐起訴人數比例會對地方首長施政滿意度產生負向影響。在施政滿意度空間自相關部分，地方政府施政滿意度現象呈現顯著正向空間自相關的情形，而施政滿意度則是會對施政滿意度產生顯著正向影響。最後，實質政府支出等變數則會對臺灣各縣市長施政滿意度產生顯著正向影響，而所得不均程度則對施政滿意度產生顯著負向影響。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Recently, several news, such as “The mayor was prosecuted for fraudulently collecting assistant fees”, “The mayor and several department directors were prosecuted for money laundering”, “Council Member of Taiwan were sentenced for fraudulently collecting assistant fees and being guilty of causing civil servants to publish falsehoods”, etc. imply that corruption is a common occurrence, and there are endless cases of corruption involving government officials. Corruption-related actions by local heads and public servants may also lead to a decline in the performance evaluation of local heads. Therefore, this article intends to explore the number of civil servants prosecuted for corruption and other factors that influence the satisfaction of local heads with policy. The effect of the impact. This study includes explanatory variables for the corruption prosecution rate of regional public servants, summarizes the Panel Data of governance satisfaction in 20 counties and cities in Taiwan from 2011 to 2022, and uses the Generalized Method of Moments as a spatial econometric empirical model analysis tool for this article. This study builds the spatial weight matrix of the spatial econometric model on the autocorrelation of peer Taiwan counties and cities, and converts it into a “peer dependence matrix”. Through the empirical estimation results of the dynamic spatial autocorrelation regression model, it is found that the proportion of the number of public officials prosecuted for corruption will have a negative impact on the satisfaction of county and city heads with their governance. As for the spatial autocorrelation phenomenon of governance satisfaction, the phenomenon of local government governance satisfaction shows significant positive spatial autocorrelation results. Finally, this article also found that variables such as expenditures by county and city governments have a significant positive impact on the governance satisfaction of county and mayors in Taiwan. The gap between rich and poor have a significant negative impact on governance satisfaction. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章、緒論 1 第一節、研究背景 1 第二節、研究流程與架構 5 第二章、文獻回顧 7 第一節、施政滿意度之定義 7 第二節、貪腐影響施政滿意度相關文獻 10 第三節、其他影響施政滿意度相關文獻 15 第三章、臺灣地方施政滿意度現況分析 24 第一節、各縣市施政滿意度現況分析 24 第二節、各縣市貪腐現況分析 29 第四章、研究方法 34 第一節、動態追蹤空間計量模型 34 第二節、實證模型變數設定 36 第三節、變數說明與資料來源 38 第五章、實證結果與分析 45 第一節、共線性與單根檢定結果 45 第二節、實證模型估計結果 48 第六章、研究結論與政策建議 54 第一節、結論與意涵 54 第二節、政策建議 57 第三節、研究限制 60 參考文獻 61 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1591636 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110255024 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 施政滿意度 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 貪腐 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 動態空間自相關迴歸模型 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Governance Satisfaction en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Corruption en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Generalized Method of Moments en_US dc.title (題名) 貪腐對地方首長施政滿意度之影響–以臺灣各縣市為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Effect of Corruption on Local Chiefs’ Satisfaction with Governance - Evidence from Counties and Cities in Taiwan en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王政（2009），「如何消除貪污─四種途徑之分析」。《文官制度季刊》，1，頁51-76。 包正豪（2013），「選舉競爭、政治賦權與原住民投票參與」。《臺灣原住民族研究季刊》，6（4），頁77-117。 李仁耀（2021），《110 年度「市政建設與市政滿意度之研究-以縣市合併十年基礎建設為例」》。高雄市：高雄市政府研考會專題研究計畫。 林啟耀（2011），「票房良藥或毒藥？探討馬政府施政滿意度對立委補選之影響」。《選舉研究》，18（2），頁31-57。 孟維德、蔡田木、劉至剛（2010），「公務員貪瀆犯罪原因及預警機制之研究」。Law Enforcement Review，6（2），頁27-57。 邱靖鈜（2009），「貪腐防制處方：政策工具觀」。《文官制度季刊》。頁179-207。 耿曙、劉嘉薇、陳陸輝（2009），「打破維持現狀的迷思：臺灣民眾統獨抉擇中理念與務實的兩難」。《臺灣政治學刊》，13（2），頁 3-56。 彭錦鵬、李俊達（2014），「影響主觀幸福感因素之研究」。發表於「2014 臺灣政治學會年會國際學術研討會，2014年12月6日，臺北市：國立臺灣大學社會科學院。 黃國敏（2004），「臺灣桃竹苗地區政策民意與施政滿意度之比較」。《香港社會科學學報》，28，頁83-115。 黃國敏（2007），「地方政府施政滿意度之探討：苗栗縣政府九十四年個案研究」。《中華人文社會學報》，6，頁10-42。 廖益興（2009），「民眾是理性還是感性?新竹市政府2005年施政滿意度調查之個案分析」。《選舉評論》，6，頁55-75。 廖興中、徐明莉（2017），「臺灣地方政府貪腐現象之時空掃描」。《公共行政學報》，53，頁1-23。 劉正山（2013），《民眾對地方政府施政滿意度影響成因之研究》。臺北市：行政院國家發展委員會專題計畫。 蔡昌言（2010），「行政首長施政滿意度的影響性分析」。《政治學報》，49，頁 41-69。 蕭怡靖、游清鑫（2006），「施政表現與投票抉擇的南北差異－2006年北高市長選舉的探討」。《臺灣民主季刊》，5（2），頁1-25。 謝俊義（2015），「探索縣市首長施政滿意度與城市競爭力的前導因素與因果關係」。收錄於謝俊義，《地方與都市治理的政策與管理：循證基礎觀點》，第五章，頁122-146。臺北市：五南出版社。 Acar, U. and A. Tİrgİl (2023), “Public Expenditures and Life Satisfaction: Evidence from Turkey.” The Developing Economies, 6(1), 36–56. Aidt, T.S. (2009), “Corruption, Institutions, and Economic Development.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(2), 271–291. Anderson, E.W. (1995), “Rational and Adaptive Performance Expectations in a Customer Satisfaction Framework.” Journal of Consumer Research, 21(4), 695–707. Anderson, C.J. and Y.V. Tverdova (2003), “Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes Toward Government in Contemporary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91–109. Anderson, T.W. and C. Hsiao (1982), “Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models Using Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics, 18(1), 47–82. Arellano, M. and S. Bond (1991), “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. Avellaneda, C.N. (2009), “Mayoral Quality and Local Public Finance.” Public Administration Review, 69(3), 469–486. Avellaneda, C.N. and R.C. Gomes (2017), “Mayoral Quality and Municipal Performance in Brazilian Local Governments.” Organizações & Sociedade , 24(83), 555–579. Avellaneda, C.N., R.A. Gomes, and R.C. Gomes (2022), “Municipal Fiscal Performance: Mayors’ Gender and Organizational Human Resources.” Journal of Policy Studies, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.52372/jps37303. Baltagi, B.H., B. Fingleton, and A. Pirotte (2014), “Estimating and Forecasting with a Dynamic Spatial Panel Data Model.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 76, 112–136. Bjørnskov, C. (2010), “How Comparable Are the Gallup World Poll Life Satisfaction Data?” Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 41–60. Bjørnskov, C., A. Dreher, and J. A.V. Fischer (2007), “The Bigger the Better? Evidence of the Effect of Government Size on Life Satisfaction around the World.” Public Choice, 130, 267–292. Blais, A. (2000), To Vote or Not to Vote?: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjrrf. Blundell, R. and S. Bond (1998), “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. Blundell, R. and S. Bond (2023), “Initial Conditions and Blundell–Bond Estimators.” Journal of Econometrics, 234, 101–110. Bond, S.R. (2002), “Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice.” Portuguese Economic Journal, 1, 141–162. Ciziceno, M. and G.A. Travaglino (2019), “Perceived Corruption and Individuals’ Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Institutional Trust.” Social Indicators Research, 141, 685–701. Dahlberg, M. and E. Johansson (2002), “On the Vote-Purchasing Behavior of Incumbent Governments.” American Political Science Review, 96(1), 27–40. Downs, A. (1957), “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 130–150. Elhorst, J.P. (2012), “Dynamic Spatial Panels: Models, Methods, and Inferences.” Journal of Geographical Systems, 14, 5–28. Ergan, S., A. Akyol, and D. Kucukaltan (2014), “The Effect of City Branding and Its Components on Resident Satisfaction.” Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 1(2), 82–97. Flavin, P., A.C. Pacek, and B. Radcliff (2011), “State Intervention and Subjective Well-Being in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” Politics & Policy, 39(2), 251–269. Flavin, P. (2019), “State Government Public Goods Spending and Citizens' Quality of Life.” Social Science Research, 78, 28–40. Fu, Y. (2017), “The Value of Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Chinese Anti-Corruption Campaign.” The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 47, 461–476. Gray, C.W. and D. Kaufman (1998), “Corruption and Development.” Finance & Development, March 1998, 7–10. Grosjean, P. and C. Senik (2011), “Democracy, Market Liberalization, and Political Preferences.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 365–381. Habibov, N., L. Fan, and A. Auchynnikava (2017), “Explaining Support for Structural Attribution of Poverty in Post-Communist Countries: Multilevel Analysis of Repeated Cross-Sectional Data.” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 44 (3), 173–197. Habibov, N., L. Fan, and A. Auchynnikava (2019), “The Effects of Corruption on Satisfaction with Local and National Governments. Does Corruption ‘Grease the Wheels’?” Europe-Asia Studies, 71(5), 736–752. Harmel, R. and Y. Yeh (2011), “Corruption and Government Satisfaction in Authoritarian Regimes: The Case of China.” APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1899973. Jain, A.K. (2001), “Corruption: A Review.” Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1), 71–121. Jonck, P. and E. Swanepoel (2016), “The Influence of Corruption: A South African Case.” Policing: An International Journal, 39(1), 159–174. Justesen, M. and C. Bjørnskov (2014), “Exploiting the Poor: Bureaucratic Corruption and Poverty in Africa.” World Development, 58, 106–115. Khemani, S. (2015), “Buying Votes versus Supplying Public Services: Political Incentives to Under-Invest in Pro-Poor Policies.” Journal of Development Economics, 117, 84–93. Lovrich, N.P. and G.T. Taylor (1976), “Neighborhood Evaluation of Local Government Services.” Urban Affairs Review, 12(2), 197–222. Ma, J., B. Guo, and Y. Yu (2022), “Perception of Official Corruption, Satisfaction with Government Performance, and Subjective Wellbeing—An Empirical Study From China.” Comparative Political Studies, 41(12), 1607–1630. Milbrath, L.W. and M.L. Goel (1977), “Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics?” Politics and Gender, 7(3), 365–390. Mishra, S.S. and M.M. Abdullahi (2020), ”Citizens’ Satisfaction with Government in a Highly Corrupt Public Life: Role of Trust in Democracy and Civil Society Participation in Somalia.” Journal of Asian and African Studies, 55(5), 762–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909619900193. Mouritzhen, P.E. (1989), ”City Size and Citizens’ Satisfaction: Two Competing Theories Revisited European.” Journal of Political Research, 17(6), 661–688. Mueller, J.E. (1970), ”Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson.” The American Political Science Review, 64(1), 18–34. Muñoz, T.M.G., J.M. Baleix, and O.O. Odeh (2019), “Inequality in Latin America: The Role of the Nature of Trade and Partners.” Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 14 (2020-25): 1–35. DOI:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2020-25. Nargesian, A., G. Jamali, M. Harati, and H. Azari (2018), “Investigating the Relationship between Corruption and Trust Related to Transparency and Citizen Satisfaction.” Journal of Public Administration, 10(2), 289–310. Nigro, H.O. and S.E.G. Císaro (2016), “The Citizen Satisfaction Index: Adapting the Model in Argentine Cities.” Cities, 56, 85–90. Nigro, H.O. and S.E.G. Císaro (2020), “Activity-based Travel as a social Signal of the City Satisfaction Index. Study Case in a Medium-sized City of Argentina.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 7. Article 100207. DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100207. Ovaska, T. and R. Takashima (2006), “Economic Policy and The Level of Self-Perceived Well-Being: An International Comparison.” The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 308–325. Park, H. and J. Blenkinsopp (2011), “The Roles of Transparency and Trust in the Relationship between Corruption and Citizen Satisfaction.” International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 254–274. Ram, R. (2009), “Government Spending and Happiness of the Population: Additional Evidence from Large Cross-country Samples.” Public Choice, 138(3), 483–490. Roodman, D. (2006), “How to Do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata.” Sage Journal, 9(1), 88–136. Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1997), “Corruption and Development.” Paper Presented in the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, April 30-May 1, 1997. Washington D.C.: The World Bank. Salim, M., X. Peng, S. Almaktary, and S. Karmoshi (2017), “The Impact of Citizen Satisfaction with Government Performance on Public Trust in the Government: Empirical Evidence from Urban Yemen.” Open Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 348–365. Tanzi, V. and H. Davoodi (1998), “Corruption, Public Investment, and Growth.” In H. Shibata and T. Ihori (eds), The Welfare State, Public Investment, and Growth. Tokyo: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-67939-4_4. Tavits, M. (2008), “On the Linkage between Electoral Volatility and Party System Instability in Central and Eastern Europe.” European Journal of Political Research, 47(5), 537–555. Welsch, H. (2008), “The Welfare Costs of Corruption.” Applied Economics, 40(14), 1839–1849. Winkelmann, L. and R. Winkelmann (2003), “Personality, Work, and Satisfaction: Evidence from the German Socio-Economic Panel.” The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 266–275. York, R. and S.E. Bell (2014), “Life Satisfaction across Nations: The Effects of Women's Political Status and Public Priorities.” Social Science Research, 48, 48–61. Zhang, B., Y. Le, B. Xia, and M. Skitmore (2016), “Causes of Business-to-Government Corruption in the Tendering Process in China.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(2). Article 05016022. https://doi.org/ 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000479. zh_TW
