學術產出-期刊論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 Double-Speaking Human Rights: Analyzing Human Rights Conception in Chinese Politics (1989-2015)
作者 陳至潔
Chen, Titus C.;Hsu, Chia-hao
貢獻者 國關中心
日期 2018-02
上傳時間 2024-09-11
摘要 What does human rights mean to the Chinese government in the post-Tiananmen era? Has the way by which Beijing conceptualizes human rights changed over time? What policies and practices have Beijing’s human rights conception privileged or delegitimized? The article takes on these intriguing questions by analyzing human rights stories in the People’s Daily. The research applies the methods of text analytics and discourse analysis to shed light on the Party-state’s effort of incorporating and reformulating the idea of human rights. It is found that, since 1989, the Chinese government has developed two major conceptions of human rights. Throughout the 1990s, human rights had been understood mainly as a source of regime threat and insecurity, hence requiring containment and rejection. Beginning in the early 2000s, an alternative argument was constructed that conceptualizes human rights as the governing capacity of the Party-state, hence deserving reception and acclamation. The rights-as-capacity argument has developed side-by-side with the rights-as-threat conception, resulting in an illiberal and dualistic rights regime in Chinese politics.
關聯 Journal of Contemporary China, Vol.27, No.112, pp.534-553
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1433487
dc.contributor 國關中心
dc.creator (作者) 陳至潔
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Titus C.;Hsu, Chia-hao
dc.date (日期) 2018-02
dc.date.accessioned 2024-09-11-
dc.date.available 2024-09-11-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2024-09-11-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153760-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) What does human rights mean to the Chinese government in the post-Tiananmen era? Has the way by which Beijing conceptualizes human rights changed over time? What policies and practices have Beijing’s human rights conception privileged or delegitimized? The article takes on these intriguing questions by analyzing human rights stories in the People’s Daily. The research applies the methods of text analytics and discourse analysis to shed light on the Party-state’s effort of incorporating and reformulating the idea of human rights. It is found that, since 1989, the Chinese government has developed two major conceptions of human rights. Throughout the 1990s, human rights had been understood mainly as a source of regime threat and insecurity, hence requiring containment and rejection. Beginning in the early 2000s, an alternative argument was constructed that conceptualizes human rights as the governing capacity of the Party-state, hence deserving reception and acclamation. The rights-as-capacity argument has developed side-by-side with the rights-as-threat conception, resulting in an illiberal and dualistic rights regime in Chinese politics.
dc.format.extent 109 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) Journal of Contemporary China, Vol.27, No.112, pp.534-553
dc.title (題名) Double-Speaking Human Rights: Analyzing Human Rights Conception in Chinese Politics (1989-2015)
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1080/10670564.2018.1433487
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1433487