| dc.contributor | 圖檔所 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 邱炯友 | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2022-05 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 30-十月-2024 11:45:18 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 30-十月-2024 11:45:18 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 30-十月-2024 11:45:18 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/154163 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 學術期刊編輯的角色整個學術傳播鏈中占有極為關鍵之功能，但期刊編輯之專業訓練卻在台灣並未受到重視亦無相關研究。期刊編輯在經營期刊出版業務的同時，除了遵守國際間學術出版倫理規範之外，亦須熟悉各大學術資料庫與期刊評比的審核機制，並深入瞭解各項審核條件之認定標準及意義；伴隨著數位科技發展，亦使得期刊編輯在操作編輯、校對、出版、發行方式以及所運用到的傳播平台時，必須重新建構有別於以往傳統出版的新型態流程。本研究係針對學術期刊編輯之職能內容進行探究，並採用深度訪談的方式深入瞭解現階段台灣學術期刊編輯團隊之工作內容及實務分工，同時蒐集並分析國內外之學術出版倫理規範及期刊評鑑收錄標準、申請條件以作為訪談基準，最後針對學術出版培育情況及學術期刊政策與規劃進行討論。本研究發現將有助於瞭解期刊經營模式與學術表現、協助期刊進行自我檢視、提供期刊出版商(產業)瞭解期刊市場發展趨勢並便利其調整出版策略，整體而言，亦有助於學術圖書館乃至政府改善期刊管理政策並做高效益之政策規劃。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The role of scholarly journal editors plays a critical role in the entire academic communication chain. However, the professional training of journal editors has not received much attention and no related research in Taiwan. In addition to complying with international scholarly publication ethics standards, journal editors must also be familiar with the review mechanism and criteria of major academic databases and journal evaluation. With the development of digital technology, journal editors must reconstruct a new type of process that is different from the traditional publishing in the past when they edit, proofread, publish, distribute, and utilize the publishing platform. This research is to explore the competence cognition for editors from scholarly journals and to use depth interviews to gain a deeper understanding of the work content and practical division for academic journal editors in Taiwan. At the same time, this research collects and analyzes international academic publishing ethics, journal evaluation standards, and application conditions as the basis for interviews. Finally, this research discusses the cultivation of academic publishing and the policy and planning of scholarly journals. Therefore, the purpose of this study would like to facilitate journal editors self-examination for its management and journal's academic contribution, as well as benefit journal commercial publishers for strategy in the marketplace. On the whole, either library or government could improve their policy making in a more healthy and positive way. | |
| dc.format.extent | 116 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 科技部, MOST109-2410-H004-169, 109.08-110.07 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 學術期刊; 期刊評鑑; 期刊出版; 出版倫理; 資料庫收錄; 編輯工作 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Scholarly Publishing; Journal Evaluation; Journal Publishing; Publication Ethics; Database Inclusion; Editorship | |
| dc.title (題名) | 學術期刊編輯職能認知之探索性研究 | |
| dc.title (題名) | An Exploratory Study on Competence Cognition of Scholarly Journal Editors | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | report | |
