學術產出-期刊論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 失眠嚴重度量表中文版的信、效度探討
其他題名 Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Insomnia Severity Index
作者 楊建銘;許世杰;林詩淳;周映妤;陳瑩明
關鍵詞 失眠;量表;信度;內部一致性;效度;切分點;敏感度;特異度;insomnia;rating scale;reliability;validity;sensitivity;specificity
日期 2009-06
上傳時間 29-十二月-2008 15:26:53 (UTC+8)
摘要 目的:本研究的目的在於檢驗失眠嚴重度量表-中文版(Insomnia Severity Index- Chinese Version; ISI-C)的信、效度。方法:本研究共分兩部分,先針對147位失眠患者及182位正常睡眠者進行ISI-C及中文版匹茲堡睡眠品質量表(Pittsburgh Sleep QualityIndex-Chinese Version; CPSQI)等量表的施測,再針對71位參與失眠認知行為治療的失眠患者,進行ISI-C以及睡眠日誌的前、後測。結果:ISI-C顯示相當好的內部一致性(Chronbach`s α=0.94),且修正後的項目-全量表相關係數皆達顯著。在效度方面,與CPSQI的總分相關達.88,與睡眠日誌的相關參數則有低度到中度的顯著相關,得分在認知行為治療後也有顯著的下降。ROC分析顯示以9分為切分點有良好的敏感度(91.8%)與特異度(91.2%)。結論:研究結果顯示ISI-C有良好的信、效度,為非常方便的失眠篩檢工具,也可以做為失眠治療的療效測量工具。
Objective: The study was conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the Insomnia Severity Index-Chinese version (ISI-C).Method: Study 1 recruited 147 insomnia patients from a general hospital and 182 normal sleepers from local communities. A package of questionnaires including the ISI-C and the Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (CPSQI) were administered to all subjects. Study 2 included 71 patients with insomnia complaints who went through a 6-session program of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). The ISI-C and sleep diaries were given to the participants before and after the CBT-I program.Results: The results showed very good internal consistency of the ISI-C, with a Chronbach`s α coefficient of 0.94. Corrected item-total items correlations were all significant. In terms of validity, ISI-C showed very good concurrent validity with the CPSQI. The total scores of these two scales correlated significantly (r = .88). The correlations between most of the items of the two scales also reached moderate to high correlations. The correlations between ISI-C items and corresponding indices derived from sleep diaries were also significant, although most of them were in the low to moderate correlation range. Furthermore, patients` scores on the ISI-C decreased significantly after receiving CBT-I program, reflecting the beneficial effects of treatment. Regarding construct validity, factor analysis revealed a single factor that can explain 73.94% of the variance. ROC analysis showed a best cut-off point of 9, with very good sensitivity (91.8%) and specificity (91.2%).Conclusion: The ISI-C has good internal consistency and validity. It can be a sensitive and specific tool for screening insomnia and a good outcome measure to evaluate the treatment effects of insomnia treatm
關聯 臨床心理學刊, 4(1), 95-104
資料類型 article
dc.creator (作者) 楊建銘;許世杰;林詩淳;周映妤;陳瑩明zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2009-06en_US
dc.date.accessioned 29-十二月-2008 15:26:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 29-十二月-2008 15:26:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-十二月-2008 15:26:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/19686-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 目的:本研究的目的在於檢驗失眠嚴重度量表-中文版(Insomnia Severity Index- Chinese Version; ISI-C)的信、效度。方法:本研究共分兩部分,先針對147位失眠患者及182位正常睡眠者進行ISI-C及中文版匹茲堡睡眠品質量表(Pittsburgh Sleep QualityIndex-Chinese Version; CPSQI)等量表的施測,再針對71位參與失眠認知行為治療的失眠患者,進行ISI-C以及睡眠日誌的前、後測。結果:ISI-C顯示相當好的內部一致性(Chronbach`s α=0.94),且修正後的項目-全量表相關係數皆達顯著。在效度方面,與CPSQI的總分相關達.88,與睡眠日誌的相關參數則有低度到中度的顯著相關,得分在認知行為治療後也有顯著的下降。ROC分析顯示以9分為切分點有良好的敏感度(91.8%)與特異度(91.2%)。結論:研究結果顯示ISI-C有良好的信、效度,為非常方便的失眠篩檢工具,也可以做為失眠治療的療效測量工具。-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Objective: The study was conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the Insomnia Severity Index-Chinese version (ISI-C).Method: Study 1 recruited 147 insomnia patients from a general hospital and 182 normal sleepers from local communities. A package of questionnaires including the ISI-C and the Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (CPSQI) were administered to all subjects. Study 2 included 71 patients with insomnia complaints who went through a 6-session program of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). The ISI-C and sleep diaries were given to the participants before and after the CBT-I program.Results: The results showed very good internal consistency of the ISI-C, with a Chronbach`s α coefficient of 0.94. Corrected item-total items correlations were all significant. In terms of validity, ISI-C showed very good concurrent validity with the CPSQI. The total scores of these two scales correlated significantly (r = .88). The correlations between most of the items of the two scales also reached moderate to high correlations. The correlations between ISI-C items and corresponding indices derived from sleep diaries were also significant, although most of them were in the low to moderate correlation range. Furthermore, patients` scores on the ISI-C decreased significantly after receiving CBT-I program, reflecting the beneficial effects of treatment. Regarding construct validity, factor analysis revealed a single factor that can explain 73.94% of the variance. ROC analysis showed a best cut-off point of 9, with very good sensitivity (91.8%) and specificity (91.2%).Conclusion: The ISI-C has good internal consistency and validity. It can be a sensitive and specific tool for screening insomnia and a good outcome measure to evaluate the treatment effects of insomnia treatm-
dc.format application/en_US
dc.language zh-TWen_US
dc.language en-USen_US
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 臨床心理學刊, 4(1), 95-104en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 失眠;量表;信度;內部一致性;效度;切分點;敏感度;特異度;insomnia;rating scale;reliability;validity;sensitivity;specificity-
dc.title (題名) 失眠嚴重度量表中文版的信、效度探討zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Insomnia Severity Index-
dc.type (資料類型) articleen