學術產出-期刊論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

  • 無doi欄位資料顯示引文資訊
題名 風險基礎資本、情境分析及動態模擬破產預測模型之比較
其他題名 An Empirical Study on the Solvency Prediction of Simulation Analysis, Scenario Analysis, and Risk-based Capital
作者 蔡政憲;宋瑞琳;詹芳書
Cheng-Hsien Tsai;Jui-Lin Eva Sung;Fang-Shu Linus Chan
關鍵詞 risk-based capital ; scenario analysis ; simulation analysis
風險基礎資本 ; 情境分析 ; 模擬分析
日期 2006.12
上傳時間 13-一月-2009 15:30:27 (UTC+8)
摘要 保險公司的清償能力一向是保險監理的重心,而所有現行的制度中,風險基礎資本是監理上的一項重要工具。可是文獻指出動態現金流量分析模型相較於風險基礎資本能提供較佳的破產預測能力。有鑑於此,本文以模擬方式加上經濟模型來分析風險基礎資本、情境分析及模擬分析等方法對破產預測的精確性,其中風險基礎資本之資料來自於美國保險監理委員會的年報資料,情境分析及模擬分析則利用我們所設定的模型。我們的結果發現情境分析與模擬分析的預測能力皆優於風險基礎資本,且前二者之預測能力相近的原因可歸因於採用相同的模擬模型。
The solvency of the insurance company is the focal point of insurance regulation. One prevalent way to safeguard the insurer`s financial strength is setting capital requirement. Although capital requirements have been transformed from constant ones to risk-based capital requirement (RBC), the literature finds that RBC is rather ineffective in rendering early warning. The literature to date further shows that scenario analysis done with dynamic cash flow models generates the best predicting results. Since a natural extension of scenario analysis is simulation analysis, this paper aims to investigate the effectiveness of simulation analysis in solvency/insolvency predictions. We find that simulation analysis as well as scenario analysis does dominate RBC in correctly classifying insurers` financial conditions. However, simulation analysis outperforms scenario analysis only by small or insignificant margins. Such a tie mainly results from the use of the same cash flow model.
關聯 臺大管理論叢,17(1),1-30
資料類型 article
dc.creator (作者) 蔡政憲;宋瑞琳;詹芳書zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Cheng-Hsien Tsai;Jui-Lin Eva Sung;Fang-Shu Linus Chan-
dc.date (日期) 2006.12en_US
dc.date.accessioned 13-一月-2009 15:30:27 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 13-一月-2009 15:30:27 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 13-一月-2009 15:30:27 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/24497-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 保險公司的清償能力一向是保險監理的重心,而所有現行的制度中,風險基礎資本是監理上的一項重要工具。可是文獻指出動態現金流量分析模型相較於風險基礎資本能提供較佳的破產預測能力。有鑑於此,本文以模擬方式加上經濟模型來分析風險基礎資本、情境分析及模擬分析等方法對破產預測的精確性,其中風險基礎資本之資料來自於美國保險監理委員會的年報資料,情境分析及模擬分析則利用我們所設定的模型。我們的結果發現情境分析與模擬分析的預測能力皆優於風險基礎資本,且前二者之預測能力相近的原因可歸因於採用相同的模擬模型。-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The solvency of the insurance company is the focal point of insurance regulation. One prevalent way to safeguard the insurer`s financial strength is setting capital requirement. Although capital requirements have been transformed from constant ones to risk-based capital requirement (RBC), the literature finds that RBC is rather ineffective in rendering early warning. The literature to date further shows that scenario analysis done with dynamic cash flow models generates the best predicting results. Since a natural extension of scenario analysis is simulation analysis, this paper aims to investigate the effectiveness of simulation analysis in solvency/insolvency predictions. We find that simulation analysis as well as scenario analysis does dominate RBC in correctly classifying insurers` financial conditions. However, simulation analysis outperforms scenario analysis only by small or insignificant margins. Such a tie mainly results from the use of the same cash flow model.-
dc.format application/en_US
dc.language zh-Twen_US
dc.language en-USen_US
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 臺大管理論叢,17(1),1-30en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) risk-based capital ; scenario analysis ; simulation analysis-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 風險基礎資本 ; 情境分析 ; 模擬分析-
dc.title (題名) 風險基礎資本、情境分析及動態模擬破產預測模型之比較zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) An Empirical Study on the Solvency Prediction of Simulation Analysis, Scenario Analysis, and Risk-based Capital-
dc.type (資料類型) articleen