| dc.contributor.advisor | 楊光華 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (作者) | 洪敬庭 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (作者) | Hung, Ching-Ting | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 洪敬庭 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Hung, Ching-Ting | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2004 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 11-九月-2009 17:12:50 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 11-九月-2009 17:12:50 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 11-九月-2009 17:12:50 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) | G0923510421 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30090 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國際經營與貿易研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 92351042 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 93 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本論文主要在討論，先決之爭點與「爭端解決規則與程序瞭解書（DSU）」第六條二項（成立小組請求）間之互動。 首先，作者區別成立小組請求兩大要件，分別為：敘明系爭措施及提供法律根據已釐清系爭案件。 其次，在此架構下，本文進而從近來所發生之四十七個爭端解決案件中，分析上訴機構對兩要件之認定標準的發展。本文發現，爭端解決小組及上訴機構透過放寬先決爭點認定標準之結果，會降低成立小組請求之明確性。同時，本文也蒐集相關實證統計資料，藉以呈現先決爭點如何影響DSU之功能。經由歸納後，本文認為，當前先決之爭點的負面影響大於正面影響。 再者，儘管先決爭點有上述問題，作者一方面仍肯定先決之爭點的正面功能，並認同爭端解決實務放寬認定標準之趨勢；另方面，則嘗試提出若干工具以避免上述負面影響大過正面影響。 最後則提出第六條第二項之修法建議。 關鍵字：爭端解決規則與程序瞭解書（DSU）第六條二項、成立小組請求、先決之爭點 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This thesis focused on the interaction between the preliminary issues and Article 6.2(panel request) of Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing The Settlement of Disputes(DSU). First, the author distinguished the two main requirements of panel request: identify the specific measures at issue, and provide a brief summary of the legal basis of the complaint sufficient to present the problem clearly. Secondly, with the two requirements as framework, the author started to scrutinize how preliminary issues affected recent 47 dispute settlement cases and analyze its implication. Then, it was observed that the Dispute Settlement Panel and the Appellate Body were broadening their review standards as to preliminary issues, which would then lead to reduce the precision of panel request. Meanwhile, this thesis collected relevant statistic data to show how the preliminary issues affected the current DSU function. Then, it was observed that the preliminary issues, so far, had strong negative effects and few positive effects on the dispute settlement system. Moreover, the author, on the one hand, recognized the function of preliminary issues and viewed current dispute settlement practice as good trend with some deficit; and, on the other hand, tried to propose some useful tools to prevent the negative effect to overcome positive effects. And eventually, proposed revision of Article 6.2 of DSU. Key words: Article 6.2 of Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing The Settlement of Disputes (DSU), panel request, preliminary issues | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第壹章 前 言 1 第一節 研究動機與背景 1 一、研究動機 1 二、背景資料 1 第二節 研究架構 2 第三節 研究方法 2 一、使用名詞之定義 2 二、有無先決之爭點的分類標準 3 三、資料來源為爭端解決實務報告 3 第貳章 DSU第六條第二項分析 5 第一節 法條分析 5 一、DSU第六條第二項 5 二、DSU第六條第二項與其他DSU條文之關係 7 三、DSU第六條第二項及不同協定條文之關係 9 第二節 要件一：得為爭端解決標的之措施 12 一、爭端解決實務已肯定之類型 12 二、爭端解決實務仍有疑義之類型 14 第三節 要件二：控訴之法律基礎是否充分提供之判斷 15 一、爭端解決實務已肯定之類型 15 二、爭端解決實務仍有疑義之類型 15 第四節 DSU第六條第二項對案件耗費時間影響之實證分析 16 一、趨勢圖 16 二、小組報告之先決爭點被上訴比例變化表 17 三、分析 17 第參章 得為爭端解決標的之措施 19 第一節 小組成立時已失效之措施 19 一、通常情形 19 二、最近案件之發展 20 第二節 小組成立時尚未生效之措施 23 一、通常情形 23 二、最近案件之發展 23 第三節 具規則或規範本質之實踐得為措施 25 一、通常情形 25 二、最近案件之發展 26 第四節 得為爭端解決標的之措施的認定趨勢 30 一、爭端解決實務之趨勢 30 二、新趨勢之影響 30 第肆章 控訴之法律基礎是否充分提供之判斷 33 第一節 過去之爭端解決實務 33 一、嚴格認定成立小組請求之文字 33 二、考量被控訴國的防禦能力是否受損 34 第二節 現在之爭端解決實務 35 一、通常情形 35 二、特殊情形 39 第三節 控訴之法律基礎是否充分認定之趨勢 41 一、爭端解決實務之趨勢 41 二、新趨勢之影響 41 第四節 本文之建議 43 第伍章 結 論 45 參 考 文 獻 47 一、GATT/WTO官方文件 47 二、英文書籍及期刊論文 48 附 件 本研究所參考之爭端解決案件及其相關資料 50 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923510421 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 爭端解決規則與程序瞭解書（DSU）第六條二項 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 成立小組請求 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 先決之爭點 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Article 6.2 of Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing The Settlement of Disputes (DSU) | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | panel request | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | preliminary issues | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | WTO爭端解決規則與程序瞭解書第六條第二項之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、GATT/WTO官方文件 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. GATT Panel Report, EEC - Measure on Animal Feed Proteins, BISD 25S/49, adopted Mar. 14, 1992. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. GATT Panel Report, United States - Prohibitions on Imports of Tuna and Tuna Products from Canada, BISD 29S/91, adopted Feb. 22, 1982. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3. GATT Panel Report, EEC - Restrictions on Imports of Apples from Chile, BISD 27S/98, adopted Nov. 10, 1980. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4. WTO Appellate Body Report, United States – Countervailing Duties on Certain Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Germany (‘US – Carbon Steel’), WT/DS213/AB/R and Corr.1, adopted Dec. 19, 2002. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5. WTO Panel Report, WTO Panel report, United States – Countervailing Duties on Certain Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Germany (‘US – Carbon Steel’), WT/DS213/R, adopted Dec. 19, 2002. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6. WTO Appellate Body Report, Guatemala – Anti–Dumping Investigation Regarding Portland Cement from Mexico (‘Guatemala – Cement I’), WT/DS60/AB/R, adopted Nov. 25, 1998. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7. WTO Appellate Body Report, United States – Measures Affecting the Cross–Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services (‘US-Gambling’), WT/DS285/AB/R, adopted Apr. 25, 2005. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8. WTO Panel Report, United States – Measures Affecting the Cross–Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services (‘US-Gambling’), WT/DS285/R, adopted Apr. 25, 2005. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9. WTO Appellate Body Report, United States – Sunset Review of Anti–Dumping Duties on Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Japan (‘US-Corrosion Resistant’), WT/DS244/AB/R, adopted Jan. 09, 2004. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 10. WTO Panel Report, United States – Sunset Review of Anti–Dumping Duties on Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Japan (‘US-Corrosion Resistant’), WT/DS244/R, adopted Jan. 09, 2004. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 11. WTO Appellate Body Report, United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton (‘US-Cotton’), WT/DS267/AB/R, adopted Mar. 21, 2005. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 12. WTO Panel Report, United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton (‘US-Cotton’), WT/DS267/R, adopted Mar. 21, 2005. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 13. WTO Appellate Body Report, Canada – Measures Relating to Exports of Wheat and Treatment of Imported Grain (‘Canada-Imported Grain’), WT/DS276/AB/R, adopted Sep. 27, 2004. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 14. WTO Panel Report, Canada – Measures Relating to Exports of Wheat and Treatment of Imported Grain (‘Canada-Imported Grain’), WT/DS276/R, adopted Sep. 27, 2004. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 15. WTO Appellate Body Report, European Communities – Customs Classification of Certain Computer Equipment (’EC-Computer Equipment’), WT/DS62/AB/R, adopted Jun. 22, 1998. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 16. WTO Panel Report, European Communities – Customs Classification of Certain Computer Equipment (’EC-Computer Equipment’), WT/DS62/R, adopted Jun. 22, 1998. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 17. Appellate Body Report, United States – Anti-Dumping Act of 1916 (‘US – 1916 Act’), WT/DS136/AB/R, WT/DS162/AB/R, adopted Sep. 26, 2000. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 18. WTO Panel Report, Japan – Measures Affecting Consumer Photographic Film and Paper (‘Japan – Film’), WT/DS44/R, adopted 22 April 1998. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 19. WTO Panel Report, Canada – Measures Affecting the Export of Civilian Aircraft (’Canada – Aircraft’), WT/DS70/R, adopted Aug. 20, 1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 20. WTO Appellate Body Report, Brazil – Export Financing Programme for Aircraft (‘Brazil – Aircraft’), WT/DS46/AB/R, adopted Aug. 20, 1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 21. WTO Appellate Body Report, India – Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Chemical Products (’India-Patent’), WT/DS50/AB/R, adopted Jan. 16, 1998. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 22. WTO Appellate Body Report, Korea – Definitive Safeguard Measure on Imports of Certain Dairy Products (’Korea-Dairy’), WT/DS98/AB/R, adopted Jan. 12, 2000. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 23. WTO Panel Report, United States – Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline (’US-Gasoline’ ), WT/DS2/R, adopted May 20, 1996. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 24. WTO Panel Report, United States – Measure Affecting Imports of Woven Wool Shirts and Blouses from India (’US - Wool Shirts and Blouses’), WT/DS33/R, May 23, 1997. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 25. WTO Panel Report, Argentina – Measures Affecting Imports of Footwear, Textiles, Apparel and other Items (’Argentina – Textiles and Apparel’), WT/DS56/R, adopted Apr. 22, 1998. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 26. WTO Panel Report, Indonesia – Certain Measures Affecting the Automobile Industry (’Indonesia-Autos’), WT/DS54/R, WT/DS55/R, WT/DS59/R, WT/DS64/R and Corr.1, 2, 3, and 4, adopted Jul. 23, 1998. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 27. WTO Panel Report, United States – Anti–Dumping and Countervailing Measures on Steel Plate from India (‘US-Steel Plate’), WT/DS206/R, adopted Jul. 29, 2002. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 28. WTO Panel Report, United States – Measures Treating Exports Restraints as Subsidies (‘US – Export Restraints’), WT/DS194/R and Corr.2, adopted Aug. 23, 2001. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 29. WTO Panel Report, United States – Sections 301-310 of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘US – Section 301 Trade Act’), WT/DS152/R, adopted Jan. 27, 2000. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 30. WTO Panel Report, India – Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Chemical Products (’India-Patent’), WT/DS50/R, adopted Jan. 16, 1998. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 31. WTO Panel Report, Korea – Definitive Safeguard Measure on Imports of Certain Dairy Products (’Korea-Dairy’), WT/DS98/R, adopted Jan. 12, 2000. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 32. WTO Appellate Body Report, European Communities – Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas (’EC – Bananas III’), WT/DS27/AB/R, adopted Sep. 25, 1997. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 33. WTO Appellate Body Report, United States – Sunset Reviews of Anti-Dumping Measures on Oil Country Tubular Goods from Argentina (‘US-Oil Tubular’), WT/DS268/AB/R, adopted Dec. 21, 2004. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 34. WTO (2004), Overview of the State of Play of WTO Disputes, Annual Report of Dispute Settlement Body, WTO Doc. WT/DSB/37/Add.1. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 35. See UNITED STATES – SUBSIDIES ON UPLAND COTTON-Notification of an Appeal by the United States under paragraph 4 of Article 16 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes , WT/DS267/17. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、英文書籍及期刊論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 36. Mitsuo Matsushita, 5 SELECTED GATT/WTO PANEL REPORTS: SUMMARIES AND COMMENTARIES IX (Fair Trade Center, Tokyo, 1999). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 37. Raj Bhala, The Precedent Setters: De Facto Stare Decisis In WTO Adjudication, Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, Fall, 1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 38. Scott Little, Preliminary Objections to Panel Requests and Terms of Reference-Panel and Appellate Body Rulings on the First Line of Defence in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings, Journal of World Trade35(4), 517. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 39. Jeff Waincymer, WTO Litigation-Procedural Aspects of Formal Dispute Settlement, 309(Published by Cameron May Ltd, 2002). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 40. Degra P. Steger and Susan M. Hainsworth, New Directions in International Trade Law: WTO Dispute Settlement, Dispute Resolution in the WTO( Cameron May Published, 1998) | zh_TW |
