學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 會計基礎評價模型之實證研究--考慮線性資訊動態
An Empirical Study of the Accounting Based Valuation-- With Linear Information Dynamics
作者 洪佩嫆
Hong, peiyung
貢獻者 張清福
Chang, chingfu
洪佩嫆
Hong, peiyung
關鍵詞 剩餘淨利
線性資訊動態模型
residual income
Ohlson model
linear information dynamics
panel data model
日期 2005
上傳時間 11-九月-2009 17:34:02 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究以Ohlson (1995) model為發展基礎,並將盈餘定義為(1)剩餘淨利及(2)盈餘水準,分別就此二種不同定義下的盈餘,以年度盈餘時間序列來測試其是否符合線性資訊動態假設,及針對各模式對股權價值估計與預測之結果做比較,探討何種評價方法或模式對於估計真實價值、解釋價格及預測報酬之效果較佳。
     研究結果發現,我國上市公司之剩餘淨利及盈餘水準時間序列皆符合線性資訊動態假說。剩餘淨利線性資訊動態模型較能正確預估次一期的盈餘。相較於單獨以帳面價值來估計股價,考慮線性資訊動態模型所建立之各評價模型所預測之估計股價皆未能正確預測權益價值及解釋權益價值之波動。在投資策略方面,因剩餘淨利模型之投資績效最為穩定,在該模型之投資策略下,V/P比率愈低(高)之投資組合獲得之平均股票報酬愈低(高),代表股價愈是被低估的投資組合可賺取更多之投資報酬,這說明剩餘淨利模型預測次期投資報酬之能力最佳,投資人可以其做為建立投資策略的參考。
Based on Ohlson (1995) model, this study specifies earnings variables as both residual income and earnings levels to test the linear information dynamic (LID) models per se and the ability of competing valuation models to value the contemporaneous stock prices. A comparison of future stock return predicting capability of competing models is also conducted.
     By using both residual income time series and earnings levels time series for examining the issue on the firms listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange (TSE), the empirical results support Ohlson’s information dynamics. However, when estimated as a time series, the linear information models using either residual income or earnings levels variables provide value estimates no better than book value does alone. From the investment strategy aspect, the superior predictive ability of the residual income valuation model with respect to future stock returns demonstrates that high (low) V/P ratios gets high (low) investment returns. It implies that the underpriced portfolio makes high investment returns. Accordingly, the residual income valuation is good for estimating returns on the following year and is therefore a valuable investment reference..
參考文獻 Abarbanell, J., and V. L. Bernard. 1992. Tests of analysts` overreaction/underreaction to earnings information as an explanation for anomalous stock price behavior. Journal of Finance: 1181-1207.
Bar-Yosef, S., J. L. Callen, and J. Livnat. 1996. Modeling dividends, earnings, and book value equity: An empirical investigation of the Ohlson valuation dynamics. Review of Accounting Studies 1: 207-224.
Beaver, W. 1997. Financial reporting: An accounting revolution, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Callen J. L. and M. Morel. 2001. Linear accounting valuation when abnormal earnings are AR (2). Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 16: 191-203.
Dechow, P., A. Hutton, and R. Sloan. 1999. An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model. Journal of Accounting and Economics 26: 1-34.
Easton, P., and T. Harris. 1991. Earnings as an explanatory variable for returns. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (Spring): 19-36.
Feltham, G. A., and J. A. Ohlson. 1995. Valuations and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (2): 689-731.
Gode, D. and J. A.Ohlson. 2006, A unified valuation framework for dividends, free-cash flows, residual income, and earnings growth based models. Working paper, New York University.
Greene, W. H. 2000, Econometric Analysis. Fourth Edition.
Hausman, J. A. 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46: 1251-1271.
Karathanassis, G. A. 2003. An empirical investigation of the traditional and the clean surplus valuation models. Managerial finance 29. Accounting & Tax Periodicals: 55-66.
Ota, K. 2001. A test of Ohlson (1995) model: Empirical evidence from Japan. The International Journal of Accounting 37 (2): 157-182.
Lee, C. M. C., Myers, and B.Swaminathan. 1999. What is the fundamental value of the Dow? The Journal of Finance 54(5): 1693-1740.
Lev, B. 1989. On the usefulness of earnings and earnings research: Lessons and directions from two decades of accounting research. Journal of Accounting Research: 153-192.
Lo, K. and T. Lys. 2000. The Ohlson model: Contribution to valuation theory, limitations, and empirical applications. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance: 337-367.
Myers, J. N. 1999. Implementing residual income valuation with linear information dynamics. The Accounting Review 74 (1): 1-28.
Ohlson, J. A. 1995. Earnings, book value, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 11(2) 61-87.
―――. 2001. Earnings, book value, and dividends in equity valuation: An empirical perspective. Contemporary Accounting Research 18(1): 107-120.
Ou, J. A. and S. H. Penman. 1989. Financial statement analysis and the prediction of stock return. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11(4): 295-329.
Watts, R. L. 1974. Accounting objectives. Working paper, University of Rochester.
吳仁杰,2002,時間序列及橫斷面評價模式應用之比較,中原大學會計學系研究所未出版碩士論文。
沈寧衛,2002,產業股價與報酬之研究---會計基礎評價模式之應用,國立中山大學財務管理學系碩士在職專班未出版論文
林冠宏,2004年,公司資訊揭露與價值攸關性之研究,國立政治大學會計學系研究所未出版碩士論文。
曹壽民、金成隆、藍心梅、陳俊雄,2001,會計基礎評價模式在台灣股市適用性之研究,2001會計理論與實務研討會論文集,東吳大學會計系編印。
許崇源、彭火樹、劉正田,1998,Feltham and Ohlson會計基礎評價模式及線性資訊模式之辨正與測試,1998會計新環境國際研討會論文集,東吳大學會計系編印。
陳志愷,1992,盈餘反應係數探索性之研究-台灣股票市場之實證分析,國立政治大學會計學系研究所未出版碩士論文。
溫政斌,2001,臺灣上市公司暫時性盈餘屬性之研究,中原大學會計學系研究所未出版碩士論文。
廖怡茲,2001,股利政策與會計資訊對權益評價之影響,國立中興大學企業管理學系研究所未出版碩士論文。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
89353024
94
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0893530242
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 張清福zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chang, chingfuen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 洪佩嫆zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Hong, peiyungen_US
dc.creator (作者) 洪佩嫆zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hong, peiyungen_US
dc.date (日期) 2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned 11-九月-2009 17:34:02 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-九月-2009 17:34:02 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-九月-2009 17:34:02 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0893530242en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30268-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 89353024zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究以Ohlson (1995) model為發展基礎,並將盈餘定義為(1)剩餘淨利及(2)盈餘水準,分別就此二種不同定義下的盈餘,以年度盈餘時間序列來測試其是否符合線性資訊動態假設,及針對各模式對股權價值估計與預測之結果做比較,探討何種評價方法或模式對於估計真實價值、解釋價格及預測報酬之效果較佳。
     研究結果發現,我國上市公司之剩餘淨利及盈餘水準時間序列皆符合線性資訊動態假說。剩餘淨利線性資訊動態模型較能正確預估次一期的盈餘。相較於單獨以帳面價值來估計股價,考慮線性資訊動態模型所建立之各評價模型所預測之估計股價皆未能正確預測權益價值及解釋權益價值之波動。在投資策略方面,因剩餘淨利模型之投資績效最為穩定,在該模型之投資策略下,V/P比率愈低(高)之投資組合獲得之平均股票報酬愈低(高),代表股價愈是被低估的投資組合可賺取更多之投資報酬,這說明剩餘淨利模型預測次期投資報酬之能力最佳,投資人可以其做為建立投資策略的參考。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Based on Ohlson (1995) model, this study specifies earnings variables as both residual income and earnings levels to test the linear information dynamic (LID) models per se and the ability of competing valuation models to value the contemporaneous stock prices. A comparison of future stock return predicting capability of competing models is also conducted.
     By using both residual income time series and earnings levels time series for examining the issue on the firms listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange (TSE), the empirical results support Ohlson’s information dynamics. However, when estimated as a time series, the linear information models using either residual income or earnings levels variables provide value estimates no better than book value does alone. From the investment strategy aspect, the superior predictive ability of the residual income valuation model with respect to future stock returns demonstrates that high (low) V/P ratios gets high (low) investment returns. It implies that the underpriced portfolio makes high investment returns. Accordingly, the residual income valuation is good for estimating returns on the following year and is therefore a valuable investment reference..
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第壹章 緒論 ........................................1
     第一節 研究動機 ........................................1
     第二節 研究問題 ........................................4
     第三節 研究架構 ........................................5
     第貳章 文獻探討 ........................................7
     第一節 Ohlson model理論回顧 ........................7
     第二節 Ohlson model (考慮資訊動態假設)之實證研究 ........10
     第三節 Panel Data Model之簡介 ........................15
     第參章 研究假說與研究方法 ................................18
     第一節 研究假說 ........................................18
     第二節 實證模型 ........................................27
     第三節 變數定義及衡量 ................................29
     第四節 資料來源及樣本選取 ................................30
     第五節 統計分析方法 ................................33
     第肆章 實證結果 ........................................36
     第一節 敍述性統計 ................................36
     第二節 盈餘持續性之探討 ................................39
     第三節 資訊動態模型之預測能力 ........................42
     第四節 評價模型之預測能力及解釋能力 ................45
     第五節 投資組合之績效 ................................51
     第伍章 結論與建議 ................................54
     第一節 結論 ........................................54
     第二節 研究限制 ........................................56
     第三節 後續研究建議 ................................57
     參考文獻 ................................................58
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0893530242en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 剩餘淨利zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 線性資訊動態模型zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) residual incomeen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Ohlson modelen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) linear information dynamicsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) panel data modelen_US
dc.title (題名) 會計基礎評價模型之實證研究--考慮線性資訊動態zh_TW
dc.title (題名) An Empirical Study of the Accounting Based Valuation-- With Linear Information Dynamicsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Abarbanell, J., and V. L. Bernard. 1992. Tests of analysts` overreaction/underreaction to earnings information as an explanation for anomalous stock price behavior. Journal of Finance: 1181-1207.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bar-Yosef, S., J. L. Callen, and J. Livnat. 1996. Modeling dividends, earnings, and book value equity: An empirical investigation of the Ohlson valuation dynamics. Review of Accounting Studies 1: 207-224.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Beaver, W. 1997. Financial reporting: An accounting revolution, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Callen J. L. and M. Morel. 2001. Linear accounting valuation when abnormal earnings are AR (2). Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 16: 191-203.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dechow, P., A. Hutton, and R. Sloan. 1999. An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model. Journal of Accounting and Economics 26: 1-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Easton, P., and T. Harris. 1991. Earnings as an explanatory variable for returns. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (Spring): 19-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Feltham, G. A., and J. A. Ohlson. 1995. Valuations and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (2): 689-731.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gode, D. and J. A.Ohlson. 2006, A unified valuation framework for dividends, free-cash flows, residual income, and earnings growth based models. Working paper, New York University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Greene, W. H. 2000, Econometric Analysis. Fourth Edition.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hausman, J. A. 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46: 1251-1271.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Karathanassis, G. A. 2003. An empirical investigation of the traditional and the clean surplus valuation models. Managerial finance 29. Accounting & Tax Periodicals: 55-66.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ota, K. 2001. A test of Ohlson (1995) model: Empirical evidence from Japan. The International Journal of Accounting 37 (2): 157-182.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lee, C. M. C., Myers, and B.Swaminathan. 1999. What is the fundamental value of the Dow? The Journal of Finance 54(5): 1693-1740.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lev, B. 1989. On the usefulness of earnings and earnings research: Lessons and directions from two decades of accounting research. Journal of Accounting Research: 153-192.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lo, K. and T. Lys. 2000. The Ohlson model: Contribution to valuation theory, limitations, and empirical applications. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance: 337-367.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Myers, J. N. 1999. Implementing residual income valuation with linear information dynamics. The Accounting Review 74 (1): 1-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ohlson, J. A. 1995. Earnings, book value, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 11(2) 61-87.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――. 2001. Earnings, book value, and dividends in equity valuation: An empirical perspective. Contemporary Accounting Research 18(1): 107-120.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ou, J. A. and S. H. Penman. 1989. Financial statement analysis and the prediction of stock return. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11(4): 295-329.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Watts, R. L. 1974. Accounting objectives. Working paper, University of Rochester.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳仁杰,2002,時間序列及橫斷面評價模式應用之比較,中原大學會計學系研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 沈寧衛,2002,產業股價與報酬之研究---會計基礎評價模式之應用,國立中山大學財務管理學系碩士在職專班未出版論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林冠宏,2004年,公司資訊揭露與價值攸關性之研究,國立政治大學會計學系研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 曹壽民、金成隆、藍心梅、陳俊雄,2001,會計基礎評價模式在台灣股市適用性之研究,2001會計理論與實務研討會論文集,東吳大學會計系編印。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許崇源、彭火樹、劉正田,1998,Feltham and Ohlson會計基礎評價模式及線性資訊模式之辨正與測試,1998會計新環境國際研討會論文集,東吳大學會計系編印。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳志愷,1992,盈餘反應係數探索性之研究-台灣股票市場之實證分析,國立政治大學會計學系研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 溫政斌,2001,臺灣上市公司暫時性盈餘屬性之研究,中原大學會計學系研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 廖怡茲,2001,股利政策與會計資訊對權益評價之影響,國立中興大學企業管理學系研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW