Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 歐洲國家效率及生產力分析-資料包絡分析法之應用
作者 林秋琴
貢獻者 林良楓
林秋琴
關鍵詞 資料包絡分析法
生產力
效率
新興主權國家
Industrialized European countries
Productivity
Data Envelopment Analysis
Emerging countries
Efficiency
日期 2003
上傳時間 11-Sep-2009 17:35:03 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究試圖探討中東歐國家由中央集權計劃經濟轉型為市場經濟之後,對其效率及生產力之影響。本研究針對1980至2000年的歐洲國家,採用資料包絡分析法(DEA)與大邊界法(Grand Frontier)畫出所有樣本的單一效率邊界並計算其整體技術效率、純技術效率、規模效率值。
     新興主權國家的整體技術效率、純技術效率、規模效率值在經濟轉型後均降低,顯示經濟轉型後的新興主權國家的確有經濟效率低落的狀況,尤其在經濟轉型初期市場不健全、經濟體質不良使資源配置不佳。傳統工業國家的整體技術效率及純技術效率在經濟轉型後較高,規模效率經濟轉型後降低。傳統工業國家於經濟轉型後整體技術效率、純技術效率及規模效率顯著的高於轉型國家、新興主權國家。
     Malmquist生產力指數分析,結果顯示傳統工業國家在經濟轉型後顯示生產力有進步,而生產力成長主要貢獻是技術進步(innovation),但傳統工業國家技術效率變動則呈現退步現象,進一步分析原因主要是由於規模效率變動退步所致。另外選擇1993年及2000年進行比較,結果發現傳統工業國家與新興國家的生產力均退步,主要原因是技術效率變動退步,但技術有進步。
參考文獻 王俊鈞,2000,效率及生產力變動之評估-OECD國家與亞洲四小龍的實證分析,私立逢甲大學經濟學研究所碩士論文
李文福,1998,台灣製造業生產力成長、技術進步與效率變動:Malmquist生產力指數與資料包絡分析之應用,行政院國科會科資中心
余尚武,1990,東歐政經改變對全球經濟的影響,今日經濟,p.57-61.
洪美蘭,2002,經濟激進轉型策略—中東歐之經驗與啟示,台北:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司
高成彬,1990,戈巴契夫改革對東歐民主化的影響,東亞季刊,第22期(3月),p.90-100.
張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧、吳聰敏,2000,經濟學,台北:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司
黃旭男,1993,資料包絡法使用程序之研究及其在非營利組織效率評估上之應用,國立交通大學管理科學研究所博士論文
單驥,1990,由遲疑到加速:1990年代歐洲單一市場推動的政治經濟觀,經濟前瞻,第17期( 1月),p.104.-107.
詹德松,1997,經濟統計指標-兼述政府統計實務,台北:華泰文化事業有限公司
鄭棨元,2001,歐洲聯盟簡史,台北:三民書局
賴永梁,1986,生產效率之衡量與應用,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文
蕭有成,1998,總要素生產力與生產技術效率之衡量評估--臺灣製造業實證分析,國立中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文
Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiency in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30: 1078-1092.
Bhattacharyya, A., C. Lovell, and P. Sahay. 1997. The impact of liberalization on the productive efficiency of indian commercial banks. European Journal of Operational Research 98: 332-345.
Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen, and W. E. Diewert. 1982. The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica 50: 1393-1414.
Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6): 429-444.
Coelli, T.J. 1998. Productivity growth in Australian electricity generation: Will the real TFP measure please stand up. CEPA Working Paper
Coelli, T.J. 1996. A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A data envelopment analysis (computer) program. CEPA Working Paper, Australia: University of New England.
Delîktas, E., M. Balcilar. 2002. A comparative analysis of productivity growth, catch-up and convergence in transition economies. Proceedings of the Sixth METU Conference on Economics. Ankara
Dimelis, S. P., and M. Dimopoulou. 2002. Evaluating Productivity Growth Measures in the EU. Economics of Planning 35: 161-181.
Dowrick, S., and D.T. Nguyen. 1989. OECD comparative economic growth 1950-85: catch-Up and convergence. The American Economic Review, vol.79, p.1010-1030.
Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, L. Björn, and R. Pontus. 1989. Productivity developments in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquist output index approach. Discussion paper. Southern Illinois University.89-3
Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris, and Z. Zhang. 1994. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review 84: 67-83.
Farrell, M. J. 1957. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General, 120(3): 253-281
Fecher, F. and S. Perelman. 1992. Productivity growth and technical efficiency in OECD industrial activities. In industrial efficiency in six nations (Ed.) Caves, MIT press, Cambridge Massachusetts, p459-488.
Forster, H., A. Isaksson, and T. H. Ng. 2001. Growth in Least Developed Countries: A Empirical Analysis of Productivity Change, 1970-1992. Working Paper, United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
Lin, L. F. 2002. Deregulation and efficiency in the Taiwan life insurance industry. PH. D. dissertation, Temple University.
Maddison, A. 1982. Phases of capitalist development, New York: Oxford University press.
Maddison, A. 1989. The world economy in the 20th century. Paris: Organization and Development.
Maudos, J., J. M. Paster, and L. E. Serrano. 2000. Convergence in OECD countries:technical change, efficiency and productivity. Applied Economics 32: 757-765.
Malmquist, S. 1953. Index numbers and indifference surfaces, Trabajos de Estadística 4: 209-242.
O’Mahony, M. 2002. Productivity and convergence in the EU. National Institute Economic Review 180 (4): 72-82.
Perelman, S. 1995. R&D, technological progress and efficiency change in industrial activities. The Review of Income and Wealth 41(3): 349-366.
Rao, D. S. P., and T. J. Coelli. 1998. A cross-country analysis of GDP growth catch-up and convergence in productivity and inequlity. CEPA working paper
Ray, S., and E. Delsi. 1997. Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries: Comment. The American Economic Review 87:1033 -1039
Shephard, R. W. 1970. Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
Solow, Robert W. 1957. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, p.312-320
Summers, R., and Heston, A. 1991. The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1987. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2) : 1-41.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
91353027
92
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0913530271
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 林良楓zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林秋琴zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 林秋琴zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2003en_US
dc.date.accessioned 11-Sep-2009 17:35:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-Sep-2009 17:35:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-Sep-2009 17:35:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0913530271en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30277-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91353027zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究試圖探討中東歐國家由中央集權計劃經濟轉型為市場經濟之後,對其效率及生產力之影響。本研究針對1980至2000年的歐洲國家,採用資料包絡分析法(DEA)與大邊界法(Grand Frontier)畫出所有樣本的單一效率邊界並計算其整體技術效率、純技術效率、規模效率值。
     新興主權國家的整體技術效率、純技術效率、規模效率值在經濟轉型後均降低,顯示經濟轉型後的新興主權國家的確有經濟效率低落的狀況,尤其在經濟轉型初期市場不健全、經濟體質不良使資源配置不佳。傳統工業國家的整體技術效率及純技術效率在經濟轉型後較高,規模效率經濟轉型後降低。傳統工業國家於經濟轉型後整體技術效率、純技術效率及規模效率顯著的高於轉型國家、新興主權國家。
     Malmquist生產力指數分析,結果顯示傳統工業國家在經濟轉型後顯示生產力有進步,而生產力成長主要貢獻是技術進步(innovation),但傳統工業國家技術效率變動則呈現退步現象,進一步分析原因主要是由於規模效率變動退步所致。另外選擇1993年及2000年進行比較,結果發現傳統工業國家與新興國家的生產力均退步,主要原因是技術效率變動退步,但技術有進步。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第壹章 緒論……………………………………………………………………1
     第一節 研究背景 ……………………………………………………………1
     第二節 研究動機及目的 ……………………………………………………2
     第三節 研究問題 ……………………………………………………………3
     第四節 研究架構 ……………………………………………………………5
     第貳章 文獻回顧……………………………………………………………7
     第一節生產力定義 …………………………………………………………7
     第二節 資料包絡分析法相關理論與應用 ………………………………8
     第三節 跨國效率與生產力分析相關文獻…………………………………18
     第參章 研究方法……………………………………………………………25
     第一節 研究假說.……………………………………………………………25
     第二節 樣本選擇與取樣期間………………………………………………26
     第三節 變數衡量.……………………………………………………………30
     第四節 研究方法……………………………………………………………32
     第肆章 實證結果……………………………………………………………42
     第一節 效率值之敘述統計…………………………………………………43
     第二節 經濟轉型對效率影響之差異檢定…………………………………46
     第三節 生產力分析…………………………………………………………67
     第四節 Tobit迴歸分析……………………………………………………70
     第伍章 結論與建議…………………………………………………………79
     第一節 結論…………………………………………………………………79
     第二節 建議與研究限制….…………………………………………………81
     參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………………83
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0913530271en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資料包絡分析法zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 生產力zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 效率zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 新興主權國家zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Industrialized European countriesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Productivityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Data Envelopment Analysisen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Emerging countriesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Efficiencyen_US
dc.title (題名) 歐洲國家效率及生產力分析-資料包絡分析法之應用zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王俊鈞,2000,效率及生產力變動之評估-OECD國家與亞洲四小龍的實證分析,私立逢甲大學經濟學研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李文福,1998,台灣製造業生產力成長、技術進步與效率變動:Malmquist生產力指數與資料包絡分析之應用,行政院國科會科資中心zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 余尚武,1990,東歐政經改變對全球經濟的影響,今日經濟,p.57-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 洪美蘭,2002,經濟激進轉型策略—中東歐之經驗與啟示,台北:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高成彬,1990,戈巴契夫改革對東歐民主化的影響,東亞季刊,第22期(3月),p.90-100.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧、吳聰敏,2000,經濟學,台北:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃旭男,1993,資料包絡法使用程序之研究及其在非營利組織效率評估上之應用,國立交通大學管理科學研究所博士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 單驥,1990,由遲疑到加速:1990年代歐洲單一市場推動的政治經濟觀,經濟前瞻,第17期( 1月),p.104.-107.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 詹德松,1997,經濟統計指標-兼述政府統計實務,台北:華泰文化事業有限公司zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭棨元,2001,歐洲聯盟簡史,台北:三民書局zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 賴永梁,1986,生產效率之衡量與應用,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蕭有成,1998,總要素生產力與生產技術效率之衡量評估--臺灣製造業實證分析,國立中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiency in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30: 1078-1092.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bhattacharyya, A., C. Lovell, and P. Sahay. 1997. The impact of liberalization on the productive efficiency of indian commercial banks. European Journal of Operational Research 98: 332-345.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen, and W. E. Diewert. 1982. The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica 50: 1393-1414.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6): 429-444.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Coelli, T.J. 1998. Productivity growth in Australian electricity generation: Will the real TFP measure please stand up. CEPA Working Paperzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Coelli, T.J. 1996. A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A data envelopment analysis (computer) program. CEPA Working Paper, Australia: University of New England.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Delîktas, E., M. Balcilar. 2002. A comparative analysis of productivity growth, catch-up and convergence in transition economies. Proceedings of the Sixth METU Conference on Economics. Ankarazh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dimelis, S. P., and M. Dimopoulou. 2002. Evaluating Productivity Growth Measures in the EU. Economics of Planning 35: 161-181.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dowrick, S., and D.T. Nguyen. 1989. OECD comparative economic growth 1950-85: catch-Up and convergence. The American Economic Review, vol.79, p.1010-1030.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, L. Björn, and R. Pontus. 1989. Productivity developments in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquist output index approach. Discussion paper. Southern Illinois University.89-3zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris, and Z. Zhang. 1994. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review 84: 67-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Farrell, M. J. 1957. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General, 120(3): 253-281zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fecher, F. and S. Perelman. 1992. Productivity growth and technical efficiency in OECD industrial activities. In industrial efficiency in six nations (Ed.) Caves, MIT press, Cambridge Massachusetts, p459-488.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Forster, H., A. Isaksson, and T. H. Ng. 2001. Growth in Least Developed Countries: A Empirical Analysis of Productivity Change, 1970-1992. Working Paper, United Nations Industrial Development Organization.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lin, L. F. 2002. Deregulation and efficiency in the Taiwan life insurance industry. PH. D. dissertation, Temple University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Maddison, A. 1982. Phases of capitalist development, New York: Oxford University press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Maddison, A. 1989. The world economy in the 20th century. Paris: Organization and Development.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Maudos, J., J. M. Paster, and L. E. Serrano. 2000. Convergence in OECD countries:technical change, efficiency and productivity. Applied Economics 32: 757-765.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Malmquist, S. 1953. Index numbers and indifference surfaces, Trabajos de Estadística 4: 209-242.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) O’Mahony, M. 2002. Productivity and convergence in the EU. National Institute Economic Review 180 (4): 72-82.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Perelman, S. 1995. R&D, technological progress and efficiency change in industrial activities. The Review of Income and Wealth 41(3): 349-366.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rao, D. S. P., and T. J. Coelli. 1998. A cross-country analysis of GDP growth catch-up and convergence in productivity and inequlity. CEPA working paperzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ray, S., and E. Delsi. 1997. Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries: Comment. The American Economic Review 87:1033 -1039zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shephard, R. W. 1970. Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Solow, Robert W. 1957. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, p.312-320zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Summers, R., and Heston, A. 1991. The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1987. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2) : 1-41.zh_TW