dc.contributor.advisor | 林碧炤 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 朱雪瑛 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | 朱雪瑛 | zh_TW |
dc.date (日期) | 2003 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 14-Sep-2009 10:07:09 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 14-Sep-2009 10:07:09 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 14-Sep-2009 10:07:09 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0087253020 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31397 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 外交研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 87253020 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 92 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 「民主和平論」是一九七○、八○年代興起的理論,承續傳統自由國際主義學派強調國家的「民主體制」可以醫治國家間戰爭行為的理想。此學派以康德為起源,經過實證研究及理論的探索,發展出「民主國家之間互不打仗」的論點。康德最早提倡,共和自由體制的國家傾向愛好和平,應在國際社會建立共和國家聯盟,並加以擴展,使更多的國家成為共和國,以帶來國際和平。但是人類歷史紀錄卻顯示,民主國家其實與非民主國家一樣的好戰,歷史上許多戰爭民主國家皆有參與。如果「民主國家確實較愛好和平」是無法推翻的說法,就應進一步分析以了解,民主國家真的較愛好和平嗎?或在特定的條件下才愛好和平?一九七○、八○年代行為學派學者紛紛以歷史文獻紀錄資料進行統計學之實證研究,並提出結論:和平確實存在於民主與民主國家間,但是不會溢出擴及非民主國。「民主和平論」迅速發展出「區隔性和平」等理論架構,並引來許多批評,發生論爭。「民主和平論」雖然興起時間甚晚,但在外交實務領域上受到極大重視,主要是因為它符合美國的理想主義精神。以民主立國的世界超強美國深信,這世界上民主國家愈多,安全的保障就愈大,除了在冷戰期間以軍事結盟的方式保衛民主國家安全之外,並在冷戰結束後提出「擴大戰略」以推廣民主。對於「民主和平論」我們有必要加以注意與了解。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究方法、架構及限制 3 第二章 「民主和平」的現象 6 第一節 近代民主國家興起與戰爭的減少 6 第二節 民主國家間不以戰爭解決問題 9 第三節 其他學派的解釋 14 第三章 「民主和平論」(Democratic Peace theory) 的主張 17 由內而外途徑(inside-out approach) 第一節 康德(Immanuel Kant)的「和平三條款」 22 第二節 竇友(Michael W. Doyle)重新詮釋康德三條款並提出「區隔性和平」(separate peace)的主張 27 第三節 羅塞特(Bruce Russett)的兩個理論模型 36 第四節 實證研究-以拉默爾(R.J. Rummel)1983年之研究為 例 45 第四章 有關「民主和平論」的爭議 51 第一節 分析層次的爭論與康德支持者的回應 52 第二節 對實證研究的批評 59 民主定義的問題 「沒有戰爭」的定義問題 第三節 「民主」與「自由」概念之混淆 71 「民主和平」其實是「自由和平」 第四節 對「區隔性和平」的批評 76 新現實主義對「北大西洋和平區」的解釋 第五節 以「理性選擇模式」批判集體安全 82 第五章 美國「推廣民主」戰略與「民主和平論」對 後冷戰時代國際關係的預測 86 第一節 美國「推廣民主」的戰略 86 第二節 對美國「推廣民主戰略」的批評 94 第三節 「民主和平論」對未來國際關係的預測 95 第六章 結論 100 參考資料 參考書籍 108 參考期刊 109 附錄: 附錄一 114 附錄二 116 表目次 【表一】自Russett以政治上相關之國家兩國一組為單位,計算出1946至1986年間,國家之間衝突行為統計表 12 【表二】R.J. Rummel在1983年的研究□將國家依其政治自由度及自由度(政治自由度加經濟自由度)區分為六種 47 【表三】Michael W. Doyle 以過去民主國家增加的速度算出未來世界和平到來的時間 98 | zh_TW |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0087253020 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 區隔性和平 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 由內而外途徑 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | 民主和平論 | zh_TW |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、 參考資料 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (一)中文書籍: | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉國英譯。康德作品選讀--永久和平的倡議者。台北:誠品出版社。民國八十八年。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (二)英文書籍: | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Burchill, Scott. Liberal Internationalism. In Theories of International Relations. Edited by Scott Burchill and Andrew Linklater. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Doyle, Michael W. An International Liberal Community. In Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order. Edited by G. Allison and G. Treverton. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company, 1992. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Penguin Books, 1992. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gilpin, Robert. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hungtington, Samuel P. The Third Wave. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kant, Immanuel. Perpetual Peace and Other Essays. Translated by Ted Humphrey. Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company, 1983. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Keohane, Robert. International Liberalism Reconsidered. In Economic Limits to Modern Politics. Edited by J. Dunn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Levy, Jack S. Domestic Politics and War. In The Origin and Prevention of Major Wars. Edited by Robert I. Rotberg and Theodore K. Rabb. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Levy, Jack S. The Causes of War: A Review of Theories and Evidence. In Behavior, society, and Nuclear War. Edited by Philip E. Tetlock et al. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | MacMillan, John. A Kantian Protest Against The Peculiar Discourse of Inter-liberal State Peace. In International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science. Edited by Andrew Linklater. London and New York: Routledge, 2000. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Morgenthau, Hans. J. and Kenneth W. Thompson. Politics Among Nations. New York: Knopf, 1985. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rosecrance, Richard. The Rise of the Trading State. New York: Basic Books, 1986. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Russett, Bruce. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Russett, Bruce and Harvey Starr, World Politics: The Menu for Choice, 4th ed. New York, 1989. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Small, Melvin and J. David Singer. Patterns in International Warfare, 1816-1980. In International War. 2nd ed. Chicago: Dorsey Press, 1989. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Waltz, K. Theories of International Politics Reading. MA : Addison-Wesley, 1979. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Waltz, K. Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics. In Neorealism and Its Critics. Edited by R. Keohan. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、 參考期刊: | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (一)中文期刊: | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李少軍。「評『民主和平論』」,歐洲(北京),1995年第四期。第4至9頁。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林碧炤。「論集體安全」,問題與研究(台北),民國83年8月第33卷第8期。第1至23頁。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 周世雄。「概念性探討國際和平與安全」,問題與研究(台北),民國83年月第33卷第5期。第65至73頁。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 金中燮。從「『文明衝突論』到『民主和平論』-『非西方』如何成為威脅?」,東亞季刊(台北),民國87年第29卷第2期。第1至19頁。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 侯漢君。「推動民主的另一個理由:『民主的和平』的探討」,行政學報 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (台北),民國86年6月第28期。第81至114頁。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 羅致政。「美國『擴展民主』戰略的理論與實踐」,台灣政治學刊(台北),民國86年12月第2期。第191至222頁。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (二)英文期刊: | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Babst, Dean V.. “A Force for Peace,” Industrial Research, Vol. 14(April 1972), pp. 55-58. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bremer, Stuart. “Democracy and Militarized Interstate Conflict, 1816-1965, ” International Interactions, Vol.18, No.3(1993), pp. 231-249. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bull, H.. “Hobbes and the International Anarchy,” Social Research, Vol. 48, No. 4(1981), pp. 717-738. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | R. Cohen. “Pacific Union: A Reappraisal of the Theory that Democracies do not Go to War with Each Other,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 48, No. 3(1994), pp. 207-223. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chan, Steve. “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall…: Are Freer Countries More Pacific?” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 28 (1984), pp. 617-48. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dixon, William J.. “Democracy and the Management of International Conflict,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 37(1993), pp. 42-68. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dixon, William J.. “Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict,” American Political Science Review, Vol.83(1994)pp. 14-32. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Doyle, Michael W.. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs: Part I,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 12 , No. 3(1983), pp. 205-35. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Doyle, Michael W.. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs: Part II,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 12, No. 4(1983), pp. 323-53. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Doyle, Michael W.. “Liberalism and World Politics,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 80(1986), pp. 1151-1169. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ember, Carol R., Melvin Ember, and Bruce Russett. “Peace Between Participatory Polities: A Cross-Cultural Test of the ‘Democracies Rarely Fight Each Other’ Hypothesis,” World Politics, Vol. 44 , No. 4(1992), pp. 573-599. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gleditsch, Nils Peter. “Geography, Democracy, and Peace,” International Interactions, Vol. 20, No. 4(1995), pp. 297-323. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hewitt, J.J., and J. Wilkenfeld. “Democracies in International Crisis.” International Interactions, Vol. 22, No. 2(1996), pp.123-142. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hungtington, Samuel P.. “A new era in democracy: democracy’s third wave,” Current, Vol.335(1991), pp. 27-39. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Huntley, Wade L.. “Kant’s Third Image: Systemic Sources of the Liberal Peace,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 1(1996), pp. 45-76. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics, Vol. 30, No. 2(1978), pp. 167-214 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kegley, Charles W. Jr., and Margaret G. Hermann. “How Democracies Use Intervention: A Neglected Dimension in Studies of democratic Peace,” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 33, No. 1(1996), pp. 309-322. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lake, David A.. “Powerful Pacifists, Democratic States and War,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 86, No. 1(1992), pp. 24-37. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lake, Anthony. “From Containment to Enlargement: current foreign policy debates in perspective,” Vital Speeches Of the Day, Vol. 60, No. 1(1993), pp. 13-19. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lake, Anthony. “A Strategy of Enlargement and the Developing World,” US Department of State Dispatch, Vol. 4, No. 43(1993), pp. 748-751. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lake, Anthony. “Confronting the Backlash States,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 73, No. 2(1994), pp. 45-55. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Layne, Christopher. “Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace,” International Security, Vol. 19, No. 2(1994), pp. 5-49. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Leng, Russell. “Reciprocating Influence Strategies and Success in Interstate Crisis Bargaining,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol.37(1993), pp. 3-41. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Levy, Jack S.. “Domestic Politics and War,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 18, No. 4(1988), pp. 653-673. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Macmillan, John. “Democracies Don’t Fight – A Case of the Wrong Research Agenda?” Review of International Studies, Vol. 22, No. 3(1996), pp. 275-299. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mansfield, Edward D., and Jack Snyder. “Democratization and the Danger of War,” International Security, Vol.20, No. 1(1995), pp. 5-38. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mansfield, Edward D., and Jack Snyder. “Democracy and War,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 74, No.3(1995), pp. 79-97. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Maoz, Zeev, and Bruce Russett. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 87, No. 3(1993), pp. 624-638. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mearsheimer, John J.. “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War,” International Security, Vol. 15, No. 1(1990), pp.5-56. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mintz, Alex, and Nehemia Geva. “Why Don’t Democracies Fight Each Other? An experimental study,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol.37, No. 3(1993), pp.484-503. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Morgan, T. Clifton and Sally H. Campbell. “Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints and War, So Why Kant Democracies Fight? " Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 35, No. 2(1991), pp. 187-211. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nye, Joseph S. Jr.. “Neorealism and Neoliberalism.” World Politics, Vol. 40, No. 2(1988), pp. 235-251 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Owen, John M.. “How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace,” International Security, Vol. 19, No. 2(1994), pp. 87-125. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Paul, John. “Wanted : a new imperialism,” National Review, Vol.44, No. 24(1992), pp. 28-33. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ray, James Lee. “Wars Between Democracies: Rare, or Non-Existent?” International Interactions, Vol. 18(1993), pp. 251-76. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rummel, R.. “Libertarianism and International violence,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 27, No. 1(1983), pp. 27-71. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Russett, Bruce. “Can a Democratic Peace Be Built?” International Interactions, Vol. 18, No. 3(1993), pp. 277-282. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Small, Melvin, and J. David Singer. “The War-Proneness of Democratic Regimes, 1816-1965,” Jerusalem Journal of International Relations, Vol. 1(1976), pp. 50-69. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Spiro, David E.. “The Insignificance of the Liberal Peace,” International Security, Vol.19, No. 2(1994), pp. 50-86. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Thompson, William R.. “Democracy and Peace: putting the cart before the horse?” International Organization, Vol. 50, No. 1(1996), pp. 141-74. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Waltz, K.. “The Emerging Structure of International Politics,” International Security, Vol. 18(1993), pp. 44-79. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Weede, Erich. “Constraints, States, and Wars,” European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 26(1993), pp. 171-192. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Weede, Erich. “Democracy and War Involvement,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 28, No. 4(1984), pp. 649-664. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zakaria, Fareed. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 76, No. 6 (1997) , pp. 22-43. | zh_TW |