學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 應用品質機能展開發展使用者導向之圖書館館藏評鑑系統
Applying Quality Function Deployment to Develop Library Collection Evaluation System based on User Needs
作者 陳廣宗
Chen, Kuang Chung
貢獻者 陳志銘
Chen , Chih Ming
陳廣宗
Chen, Kuang Chung
關鍵詞 圖書館評鑑
館藏評鑑
品質機能展開
品質屋
使用者需求
使用者導向
Library evaluation
Collection evaluation
Quality Function Deployment
House of Quality
User needs
User Oriented
日期 2008
上傳時間 14-九月-2009 11:59:52 (UTC+8)
摘要 館藏評鑑是圖書館館藏發展中重要的一環,圖書館透過館藏評鑑了解館藏的現況優劣,包括內容品質、使用情形、使用者的需求差異等層面,作為修正採訪策略或讀者服務的參考。然而基於人力、成本等因素,館藏評鑑常成為圖書館的負擔,對於資源不足的中小型、基層圖書館而言,更是艱難的工作,所以尋求一套相對簡易的方法,以節省人力物力的方式進行館藏的評估,是有其需求的。
     因此,本研究嘗試以「品質機能展開(Quality function deployment,QFD)」為基礎,發展一套半自動化的「使用需求導向館藏評鑑系統」,希望以系統化和新的不同評鑑模式來輔助館藏評鑑。本系統所應用之資料來源為使用者問卷調查以及圖書館自動化系統的各種紀錄,透過品質機能展開,以量化的方法將兩者做矩陣式的對應和計算並求得結果,作為輔助館藏評鑑時的參考。
     本研究以台北市木柵高工圖書館為對象,研究方法及流程依次為:問卷調查、系統實作分析、訪談。首先以問卷調查法訪問學校圖書館使用者,取得使用者之需求;再將這些需求的數值輸入系統中,與圖書館自動化系統的紀錄合併進行品質機能展開計算;最後,將系統運算分析出來的結果,用訪談的方式訪問木柵高工圖書館員,檢視本系統之有效性與館員對本系統之看法。
     研究之發現有以下幾點:1.應用品質機能展開所開發之系統,確實可應用於館藏評鑑,但較適合觀察長期趨勢;2. 不同使用者族群對圖書館館藏重視之層面可能有差異,此差異在本系統中會對結果造成影響,影響幅度由需求差異大小決定;3.無法量化計算的質性使用者需求,仍然受到使用者重視,在館藏評鑑中亦相當重要;4.本研究所開發之系統,有助於資源不足之基層圖書館館藏評鑑作業的推動。
Library collection evaluation is one of important part of collection development, to understand the goodness or weakness of collection. It includes quality of content, analyzing of use, user needs, etc. But because of lake of staff and funds, collection evaluation becomes a burden to many libraries. To small libraries, it is more difficult. So it is necessary to develop a simple method to save the cost and labors for libraries.
     This study applies the Quality Function Deployment to develop a half-automatic library collection evaluation system, hoping to help collection evaluation works in a systematic, efficient way. The system in this study uses two kinds of data for computing: questionnaire survey of user needs and library automation system records. By applying the Quality Function Deployment, the system can combine above data and records, and generate analysis of collection and user needs in graphics. Finally, it can help decision making according to this information.
     This study takes Taipei Muzha vocational high school as the object, the method and procedures would be: questionnaire survey, system developing and analyzing, interview with librarians.
     The study obtains following conclusions: 1.Applying QFD, this system can help collection evaluation in practical, but it is more suitable to observe long-term trends than short-term; 2. Different group of users concern different needs in using library collections, those differences will affect the result of this collection evaluation system; 3. Some user needs can not be quantitated for system progressing, part of those needs are important in users’ opinions, so in a practical collection evaluation work, libraries can not ignore them; 4. This collection evaluation system can help some small-scale, basic-level, insufficient-resource libraries to accomplish their collection evaluation work.
參考文獻 中文部份
水野滋 (1986)。品質機能展開,台北,前程企管公司。
王明妤、黃炟淐、曾建閔 (2006年12月)。應用環境品質機能展開於塑膠抽屜式整理箱之設計改善:以北縣市大學生的需求為例,環境與管理研究,7(2),37-52
王梅玲 (2003)。圖書資訊選擇與採訪,台北市:空大。
全國法規資料(2008a)。高中圖書館設立及營運基準。線上檢索日期:2008年10月13日。全國法規資料庫。網址:http://law.moj.gov.tw/。
全國法規資料(2008b)。大學圖書館設立及營運基準。線上檢索日期:2008年10月13日。全國法規資料庫。網址:http://law.moj.gov.tw/。
吳明德 (1991)。館藏發展。台北市:漢美。
吳明德、薛理桂 (1995)。圖書選擇與採訪,蘆洲市:空大。
吳泓怡、程貳隆、王銘宗、陳啟明 (2008)。應用SERVQUAL與品質機能展開於文教產業服務品質之提升,顧客滿意學刊,4(1),163-202。
李友錚、黃勝彥、張仲銘 (2007)。以AHP、ANP與QFD探討如何提升中華職棒之觀眾滿意度,中華管理學報,8(3),43-57。
李采芩、李俊彥、林士彥 (2007)。品質機能展開應用於服務業之研究:以中部J報關公司為例,中小企業發展季刊,6,169-192。
李美燕 (1993)。流通紀錄與館藏使用評鑑:以政治大學圖書館為例。政大圖資通訊,6,12-29.
林巧敏 (1994)。淺介館藏評鑑之研究。國立中央圖書館臺灣分館館訊,15,42-49。
邱子恆 (2004年6月)。引用文獻分析在健康科學館藏經費分配之應用:以臺北醫學大學圖書館為例,圖書與資訊學刊,2(1),19-33。
邱美玲 (2006)。應用品質機能展開法提昇大學圖書館服務品質之研究:以某國立大學圖書館為例。(碩士論文,彰化師範大學,2006)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,095NCUE5316102。
洪順展 (2006)。改善液晶監視器品質的關鍵因素,修平學報,13,95-110。
張保隆、謝寶煖(1996)。利用品質機能展開提升圖書館參考服務品質。圖書館學刊,11,63-93。
張菀玲 (2006)。品質機能展開在產品研發的應用:以LED資訊顯示系統運用於汽車產業為例,(碩士論文,長庚大學,2007)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,095CGU00121078。
曹婷婷 (2006)。以引用文獻分析探討醫學院教師資訊需求與館藏支援程度(碩士論文,輔仁大學,2006)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,095FJU00448012。
梁定澎 (2006)。決策支援系統與企業智慧,台北:智勝。
陳銘詮 (1997)。大學圖書館整體服務品質之調查研究-利用品質機能展開法,(碩士論文,東華大學, 1997)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,086NDHU0121008。
陳嬿安 (2000)。應用品質機能展開法改善大專院校圖書館服務品質:以輔仁大學「社會科學」圖書館為例,(碩士論文,輔仁大學, 2000)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,089FJU00506007。
傅永光(2005)。以結合AHP之QFD探討國軍新兵訓練之課程規劃。(碩士論文,中華大學,2005)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,094CHPI0230054。
程麟雅 (2005)。國立政治大學圖書館傳播學院圖書分館館藏評鑑之探討:以「新聞學研究」為例,書藝,41,45-56。
楊美華(1999年7月)。館藏品質管理。中國圖書館學會八十八年圖書館品質管理專題研習班,中山大學。
溫仁助(1995)。館內資料使用評鑑之研究。台北市立圖書館館訊,12(4),78-95。
劉吉軒、陳碧珠、陳靜宜、張淑芬、劉麗珍、林維儀 (2008年2月)。國立政治大學商學院學位論文引用文獻分析與館藏支援之研究,圖書與資訊學刊,64,1-30。
劉春銀(2004年9月)。淺談圖書館統計與圖書館績效評估,發表於全國大專院校圖書館自動化第二十次研討會。高雄:國立中山大學圖書館。
劉新文(2007)。圖書館圖書複本量的定量分析。西南師範大學學報,32(4),87-89。
蔡天怡 (2007)。資訊可獲性對圖書資訊學博碩士論文引用文獻影響之研究(台灣大學,碩士論文, 2007)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,096NTU05447016。
蔡秀芬、李志偉 (2007年7月)。運用QFD手法來研究五年制專科英語課程之適用性。新生學報,2,349-361.
盧秀菊(1999)。學術圖書館之績效評估,大學圖書館,3(4),4-14。
蘇蓉波 (2003年10月)。從博士學位論文引用文獻探討成功大學圖書館館藏支援程度,國立成功大學圖書館館刊,12,53-69。
蘇慧芳 (2006)。揭開品質的真面目:品質機能展開法簡介,醫護科技學刊,8(3),229-236。
西文部份
Anderson, C. (2006). The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More. New York : Hyperion.
Association of College and Research Libraries (2000). ACRL Standards for College Libraries. Retrieved October.22, 2008, from http://www.tamuk.edu/sacs/newsacs/pdfs/Mastdoc/other/ACRL.pdf
Bayraktaroglu G. & Özgen, Ö. (2008). Integrating the Kano model, AHP and planning matrix; QFD application in library services, Library Management, 29(4/5), 327.
Bhola, L. K. & Mishra, S. (1995, January/April). Dependency Quotient: A Tool for Collection Evaluation. Herald of Library Science , 34, nos. 1-2, 62-65.
Chin, K. S. & Pun, K. F. & Leung, W. M. & Lau, H. (2001). A quality function deployment approach for improving technical library and information services: A case study, Library Management, 22(4/5), 195.
Christiansen, D. E. & Davis C. R. & Jutta R. S. (1983). Guide to Collection Evaluation Through Use and User Studies, Library Resources & Technical Services, 27.
Christiansen, D. E. & Davis, C. R. & Reed-Scott, J. (1983). Guide to collection evaluation through use and user studies, Library Resources & Technical Services, 27, 435.
Coffee, M. (2005, March/April). How we proved our library`s value with an ROI assessment. Marketing Library Services, 19(2), 1-3, 5.
Dennison, R. F. (2000). Quality Assessment of Collection Development Through Tiered Checklists: Can You Prove You Are a Good Collection ? Collection Building, 19(1), 24-26.
Evans, G. E. & Saponaro, M. Z. (2005). Developing library and information center collections (5th ed). Libraries Unlimited.
Evans, G. E. (1995). Developing library and information center collection (3rd ed). Englewood, Co.: Libraries Unlimited.
Evans, G. E. (2004). Developing Library & Informat.centre Collections (4th ed). Greenwood Publishing Group.
Evans, J. R. & Lindsay, W. M. (2002). The Management and Control of Quality (5th ed). Thomson South-Western.
Flaherty, B. (2002. February). Assessing Legal Collections: Trying to Eke Out a Method from the Madness. Against the Grain, 14, 66-68, 70.
Fussler, H. H. & Simon, J. L. (1969). Patterns in the use of books in large research libraries. Chicago. University of Chicago, 3. (Quoted from Kent A. and others(1979). Use of library materials: The University of Pittsburgh study. New York. Marcel Dekker Inc, 31)
Greer, A. T. (2002). A model for the delivery and evaluation of asynchronous and interactive synchronous library services at Southern Adventist University (Ph.D., Nova Southeastern University, 2002).
Griffin, P. S. (1996). Faculty Surveys of Collections, Roanoke Bible College, May-September 1995. Christian Librarian, 39, 25-27, 30.
Hall, B. H. (1985). Collection Assessment Manual for College and University Libraries. Phoenix, AZ : Oryx.
Halliday, B. (2001). Identifying Library Policy Issues with List Checking. In Danny P. W. & Connie V. F.(Eds.), Library Evaluation: A Case book and Can-Do Guide. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Harrell, J. (1992). Use of the OCLC/AMIGOS Collection Analysis CD to Determine Comparative Collection Strength in English and American Literature: A Case Study. Technical Services Quarterly, 9(3), 1-14.
Jain, A. K. (1969). Sampling and data collection methods for a book-use study, Library Quarterly, 39, 245.
Katz, W. A. (1980). Collection development: The selection of materials for libraries. New York: Holt, Rinchart & Winston.
Kent , A. (1979). Use of Library Materials: The University of Pittsburgh Study, New York: Marcel Dekker, 13.
Lancaster, F. W.(1988). If you want to evaluate your library. Champaign IL: University of Illinois.
Lancaster, F. W.(1992), The measurement and evaluation of library services. Washington, D. C.: Information Resource Press, 80.
Leng, Y. L. (1995). The Development of the Book Collection is Not Well Planned: Practising Collection Evaluation. Singapore Libraries, 24, 20-31.
Levine, M. (1980). Measuring Circulation/ acquisition ratio: an input-output measure for libraries. Information Processing and Management, 16(16), 313-315.
Loertscher, D. V. (1996). Collection Mapping in the LMC: Building Access in a World of Technology. San Jose, CA: Hi Willow Research and Publishing.
Marsh, K. & Arbogast, L. (2007). Plan Your Library. 2007 Annual Conference of Virginia Educational Media Association.
Mazur, G. (2003). Voice of the customer (define): QFD to define value. Annual Quality Congress, 57, 151-157.
McInnis, R. M. (1972). The Formula Approach to Library Size: An Empirical Study of Its Efficacy in Evaluation Research Libraries, College & Research Libraries, 33(92).
Mosher, P. H. (1980). Collection evaluation or Analysis: Matching Library Acquisitions to Library Needs, in Collection Development in Libraries : A Treatise, Part B .Greenwich: JAI, 529-530.
Nancy V. H. and Others (1987). Output measures for public libraries: A manual of standardized procedures (2nd ed). Chicago: American Library Association.
Nisonger, T. E. (1997). Electronic journal collection management issue. Collection Building, 16(2), 62.
Nisonger, T. E. (2003). Evaluation of library collections, access, and electronic resources : a literature guide and annotated bibliography. Westport, Conn. : Libraries Unlimited.
Pall, R. & Peter T. B. (1996). Measuring quality: International guidelines for performance measurement in academic libraries. Munchen: K.G. Saur.
Perkins, D. L. (1979). Characteristics of References in Selected Scholar English Literary Journals, Library Quarterly, 50.
Rao, S. N. (1993). Meeting Modern Demands of Collection Evaluation: A New Approach. Collection Building 13(1), 33-36.
Sweetland, J. H. & Christensen, G. P. (1997, March). Developing Language and Literature Collections in Academic Libraries: A Survey. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 23, 119-125.
Zweizig, D.& Rodger, E. J. (1982). Output measures for public libraries: A manual of standardized procedures. Chicago: American Library Association.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
95155010
97
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095155010
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 陳志銘zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chen , Chih Mingen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 陳廣宗zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Chen, Kuang Chungen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳廣宗zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Kuang Chungen_US
dc.date (日期) 2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned 14-九月-2009 11:59:52 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 14-九月-2009 11:59:52 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 14-九月-2009 11:59:52 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0095155010en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31748-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊與檔案學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95155010zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 館藏評鑑是圖書館館藏發展中重要的一環,圖書館透過館藏評鑑了解館藏的現況優劣,包括內容品質、使用情形、使用者的需求差異等層面,作為修正採訪策略或讀者服務的參考。然而基於人力、成本等因素,館藏評鑑常成為圖書館的負擔,對於資源不足的中小型、基層圖書館而言,更是艱難的工作,所以尋求一套相對簡易的方法,以節省人力物力的方式進行館藏的評估,是有其需求的。
     因此,本研究嘗試以「品質機能展開(Quality function deployment,QFD)」為基礎,發展一套半自動化的「使用需求導向館藏評鑑系統」,希望以系統化和新的不同評鑑模式來輔助館藏評鑑。本系統所應用之資料來源為使用者問卷調查以及圖書館自動化系統的各種紀錄,透過品質機能展開,以量化的方法將兩者做矩陣式的對應和計算並求得結果,作為輔助館藏評鑑時的參考。
     本研究以台北市木柵高工圖書館為對象,研究方法及流程依次為:問卷調查、系統實作分析、訪談。首先以問卷調查法訪問學校圖書館使用者,取得使用者之需求;再將這些需求的數值輸入系統中,與圖書館自動化系統的紀錄合併進行品質機能展開計算;最後,將系統運算分析出來的結果,用訪談的方式訪問木柵高工圖書館員,檢視本系統之有效性與館員對本系統之看法。
     研究之發現有以下幾點:1.應用品質機能展開所開發之系統,確實可應用於館藏評鑑,但較適合觀察長期趨勢;2. 不同使用者族群對圖書館館藏重視之層面可能有差異,此差異在本系統中會對結果造成影響,影響幅度由需求差異大小決定;3.無法量化計算的質性使用者需求,仍然受到使用者重視,在館藏評鑑中亦相當重要;4.本研究所開發之系統,有助於資源不足之基層圖書館館藏評鑑作業的推動。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Library collection evaluation is one of important part of collection development, to understand the goodness or weakness of collection. It includes quality of content, analyzing of use, user needs, etc. But because of lake of staff and funds, collection evaluation becomes a burden to many libraries. To small libraries, it is more difficult. So it is necessary to develop a simple method to save the cost and labors for libraries.
     This study applies the Quality Function Deployment to develop a half-automatic library collection evaluation system, hoping to help collection evaluation works in a systematic, efficient way. The system in this study uses two kinds of data for computing: questionnaire survey of user needs and library automation system records. By applying the Quality Function Deployment, the system can combine above data and records, and generate analysis of collection and user needs in graphics. Finally, it can help decision making according to this information.
     This study takes Taipei Muzha vocational high school as the object, the method and procedures would be: questionnaire survey, system developing and analyzing, interview with librarians.
     The study obtains following conclusions: 1.Applying QFD, this system can help collection evaluation in practical, but it is more suitable to observe long-term trends than short-term; 2. Different group of users concern different needs in using library collections, those differences will affect the result of this collection evaluation system; 3. Some user needs can not be quantitated for system progressing, part of those needs are important in users’ opinions, so in a practical collection evaluation work, libraries can not ignore them; 4. This collection evaluation system can help some small-scale, basic-level, insufficient-resource libraries to accomplish their collection evaluation work.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目次 …………………………………………………….…………….…i
     圖表目次 ……………………………………………….………………iii
     第一章、 緒論……………………………..….…………………………1
     第一節、 研究動機……………………………………………………1
     第二節、 研究問題與目的……………………………………………3
     第三節、 研究範圍與限制……………………………………………4
     第四節、 名詞解釋……………………………………………………6
     第二章、 文獻探討……………………………………………..………7
     第一節、 館藏評鑑的意涵………. ………………………..…………7
     第二節、 以館藏為中心的館藏評鑑的方法和應用……………..…16
     第三節、 以使用者為中心的館藏評鑑方法及應用....………….….25
     第四節、 品質機能展開..……………………………..……………..33
     第三章、研究方法與系統設計………………………..………………43
     第一節、 研究架構……………………………….…….……………43
     第二節、 研究對象…………………………………….……….……45
     第三節、 研究方法…………………………………….………….…47
     第四節、 研究工具…………………………………….…………….57
     第四章、研究結果分析………………………………..………………60
     第一節、 本研究系統介面……………………………………..……60
     第二節、 第一層品質屋與使用者需求問卷…………………..……69
     第三節、 第二層品質屋………………………………….…….……81
     第四節、 第三層品質屋…………………………………….…….…93
     第五節、 訪談分析驗證評鑑結果…………………….…………...106
     第六節、 本研究評鑑法和其他館藏評鑑方法的比較……………111
     第五章、結論與建議…………………………………..…………..…116
     第一節、 結論…………………………………….…….………..…116
     第二節、 建議………………………………………….……….…..119
     
     參考書目 ………………………….…………...…………………..…121
     附錄一 ………………………………………………………………..126
     附錄二 ………………………………………………………………..128
     附錄三 ……………………………………………………………..…130
     附錄四 ………………………………………………………………..132
     附錄五 ………………………………………………………………..136
     附錄六 ………………………………………………………………..137
     附錄七 ………………………………………………………………..138
     附錄八 ………………………………………………………………..143
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     圖表目次
     表目次
     表1-3-1 本研究研究範圍說明表…………….……………………...……..…4
     表2-2-1 館藏繪圖比對(Collection mapping)範例表…………………...…..18
     表2-4-1 近五年我國品質機能展開各領域研究情況表………………........39
     表3-3-1 本研究之問卷設計…………………………………………......…..47
     表3-3-2本研究問卷調查抽樣方法….………………………….………...….48
     表3-3-3 HOQ1,第一層品質屋……..……………….……………...…...…..50
     表3-3-4 本研究數據指標歸納類型表……..…..……………………………51
     表3-3-5 HOQ2,第二層品質屋計算示意表………………..………………..52
     表3-3-5 HOQ3,第三層品質屋示意表……………………..………………..56
     表4-2-1 本研究問卷的題目…………………………………...………...…..70
     表4-2-2 本研究母群體人數及抽樣數…………………………...……...…..71
     表4-2-3本研究抽樣有效樣本數………………………………………...…..71
     表4-2-4 使用者需求問卷信度分析結果.……………..………………...…..72
     表4-2-5 考量全部使用者需求的第一層品質屋………………...……...…..79
     表4-2-6 只考慮學生需求的第一層品質屋……………………...……...…..80
     表4-3-1 館員設定之需求要素與數據指標強度關係表(1 of 2)…….......….82
     表4-3-2 館員設定之需求要素與數據指標強度關係表(2 of 2)……….…...83
     表4-3-3 數據指標之歸納與建議改進方向……………………...…….........85
     表4-3-4 1998年總類第二層品質屋計算表(1 of 2)……………………...….86
     表4-3-5 1998年總類第二層品質屋計算表(2 of 2)…………………………87
     表4-4-1 1998第三層品質屋計算結果………………………………………94
     表4-4-2 本研究劃分的不同使用者群…………...………………………...101
     表4-5-1 2006館藏借閱率及次年購書量…………………………………..107
     表4-6-1 品質機能展開與傳統館藏數據分析的比較………………..……112
     表4-6-2 品質機能展開評鑑與其他館藏評鑑方法的比較…………...…...114
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     圖目次
     圖2-1-1. 館藏發展流程示意圖...……….………..…………..……….……..10
     圖2-2-1. Worldcat Collection Analysis分析結果截圖.……………………...22
     圖2-4-1. 品質屋……...…….………………………………………..……….35
     圖2-4-2. Service Quality Function Deployment......…….……………………38
     圖3-1-1. 本研究架構圖…...………………………….……………..……….44
     圖3-2-1. 木柵高工圖書館自動化系統資料庫系統架構圖………..……….46
     圖3-3-1. 本研究品質機能展開步驟圖…………………...………………....49
     圖3-4-1. 本研究決策支援系統架構圖…………………………………...…58
     圖4-1-1. 本研究館藏評鑑系統網頁截圖……......….……….…………...…61
     圖4-1-2. 本研究網路問卷系統截圖…………......….……….…………...…62
     圖4-1-3. 選取欲分析的施測資料範圍………......….……….…………...…62
     圖4-1-4. 設定讀者權重………………………......….……….…………...…64
     圖4-1-5. 品質屋權重設定……………………......….……….…………...…65
     圖4-1-6. 品質屋計算…………………………......….……….…………...…66
     圖4-1-7. 結果呈現……………………………......….……….…………...…67
     圖4-1-8. 本研究QFD系統第二層品質屋計算截圖(網頁局部)………...…67
     圖4-2-1. 使用者需求差異比較圖………………………………………...…73
     圖4-2-2. 不同年級需求差異圖…………………………………………...…75
     圖4-2-3. 使用者與非使用者需求對照圖………………………………...…77
     圖4-3-1. 應用科學與語文類館藏量相關指標逐年平均圖.……………......88
     圖4-3-2. 借閱狀況相關指標三年平均線圖(只列四類)……….………...…89
     圖4-3-3. 更新度相關指標三年平均線圖(只列三類)………….………...…90
     圖4-3-4. 使用時間相關指標三年平均線圖(只列五類)……………………91
     圖4-3-5. 使用者群相關指標三年平均線圖(只列四類)……………………92
     圖4-4-1. 品質機能展開館藏評鑑系統截圖……...…………………………95
     圖4-4-2. 語文類三年平均線…………………………...……………………96
     圖4-4-3.自然、應用、社會科學三年平均線….……………………………97
     圖4-4-4. 史地類三年平均線…………………………...……………………98
     圖4-4-5.哲學、藝術類三年平均線………………………….………………99
     圖4-4-6.總類、宗教類三年平均線………………………….………………100
     圖4-4-7. 1998年不同年級使用者群評鑑結果比較圖……………………..102
     圖4-4-8. 1998年不同經驗使用者群評鑑結果比較圖……………………..104
     圖4-5-1. 科學史地類和藝術類升降對照………………………………….109
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095155010en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 圖書館評鑑zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 館藏評鑑zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 品質機能展開zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 品質屋zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 使用者需求zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 使用者導向zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Library evaluationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Collection evaluationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Quality Function Deploymenten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) House of Qualityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) User needsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) User Orienteden_US
dc.title (題名) 應用品質機能展開發展使用者導向之圖書館館藏評鑑系統zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Applying Quality Function Deployment to Develop Library Collection Evaluation System based on User Needsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 水野滋 (1986)。品質機能展開,台北,前程企管公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王明妤、黃炟淐、曾建閔 (2006年12月)。應用環境品質機能展開於塑膠抽屜式整理箱之設計改善:以北縣市大學生的需求為例,環境與管理研究,7(2),37-52zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王梅玲 (2003)。圖書資訊選擇與採訪,台北市:空大。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 全國法規資料(2008a)。高中圖書館設立及營運基準。線上檢索日期:2008年10月13日。全國法規資料庫。網址:http://law.moj.gov.tw/。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 全國法規資料(2008b)。大學圖書館設立及營運基準。線上檢索日期:2008年10月13日。全國法規資料庫。網址:http://law.moj.gov.tw/。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳明德 (1991)。館藏發展。台北市:漢美。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳明德、薛理桂 (1995)。圖書選擇與採訪,蘆洲市:空大。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳泓怡、程貳隆、王銘宗、陳啟明 (2008)。應用SERVQUAL與品質機能展開於文教產業服務品質之提升,顧客滿意學刊,4(1),163-202。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李友錚、黃勝彥、張仲銘 (2007)。以AHP、ANP與QFD探討如何提升中華職棒之觀眾滿意度,中華管理學報,8(3),43-57。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李采芩、李俊彥、林士彥 (2007)。品質機能展開應用於服務業之研究:以中部J報關公司為例,中小企業發展季刊,6,169-192。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李美燕 (1993)。流通紀錄與館藏使用評鑑:以政治大學圖書館為例。政大圖資通訊,6,12-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林巧敏 (1994)。淺介館藏評鑑之研究。國立中央圖書館臺灣分館館訊,15,42-49。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱子恆 (2004年6月)。引用文獻分析在健康科學館藏經費分配之應用:以臺北醫學大學圖書館為例,圖書與資訊學刊,2(1),19-33。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱美玲 (2006)。應用品質機能展開法提昇大學圖書館服務品質之研究:以某國立大學圖書館為例。(碩士論文,彰化師範大學,2006)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,095NCUE5316102。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 洪順展 (2006)。改善液晶監視器品質的關鍵因素,修平學報,13,95-110。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張保隆、謝寶煖(1996)。利用品質機能展開提升圖書館參考服務品質。圖書館學刊,11,63-93。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張菀玲 (2006)。品質機能展開在產品研發的應用:以LED資訊顯示系統運用於汽車產業為例,(碩士論文,長庚大學,2007)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,095CGU00121078。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 曹婷婷 (2006)。以引用文獻分析探討醫學院教師資訊需求與館藏支援程度(碩士論文,輔仁大學,2006)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,095FJU00448012。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梁定澎 (2006)。決策支援系統與企業智慧,台北:智勝。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳銘詮 (1997)。大學圖書館整體服務品質之調查研究-利用品質機能展開法,(碩士論文,東華大學, 1997)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,086NDHU0121008。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳嬿安 (2000)。應用品質機能展開法改善大專院校圖書館服務品質:以輔仁大學「社會科學」圖書館為例,(碩士論文,輔仁大學, 2000)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,089FJU00506007。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 傅永光(2005)。以結合AHP之QFD探討國軍新兵訓練之課程規劃。(碩士論文,中華大學,2005)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,094CHPI0230054。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 程麟雅 (2005)。國立政治大學圖書館傳播學院圖書分館館藏評鑑之探討:以「新聞學研究」為例,書藝,41,45-56。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊美華(1999年7月)。館藏品質管理。中國圖書館學會八十八年圖書館品質管理專題研習班,中山大學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 溫仁助(1995)。館內資料使用評鑑之研究。台北市立圖書館館訊,12(4),78-95。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉吉軒、陳碧珠、陳靜宜、張淑芬、劉麗珍、林維儀 (2008年2月)。國立政治大學商學院學位論文引用文獻分析與館藏支援之研究,圖書與資訊學刊,64,1-30。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉春銀(2004年9月)。淺談圖書館統計與圖書館績效評估,發表於全國大專院校圖書館自動化第二十次研討會。高雄:國立中山大學圖書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉新文(2007)。圖書館圖書複本量的定量分析。西南師範大學學報,32(4),87-89。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡天怡 (2007)。資訊可獲性對圖書資訊學博碩士論文引用文獻影響之研究(台灣大學,碩士論文, 2007)。全國博碩士論文資訊網,096NTU05447016。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡秀芬、李志偉 (2007年7月)。運用QFD手法來研究五年制專科英語課程之適用性。新生學報,2,349-361.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 盧秀菊(1999)。學術圖書館之績效評估,大學圖書館,3(4),4-14。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇蓉波 (2003年10月)。從博士學位論文引用文獻探討成功大學圖書館館藏支援程度,國立成功大學圖書館館刊,12,53-69。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇慧芳 (2006)。揭開品質的真面目:品質機能展開法簡介,醫護科技學刊,8(3),229-236。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 西文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anderson, C. (2006). The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More. New York : Hyperion.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Association of College and Research Libraries (2000). ACRL Standards for College Libraries. Retrieved October.22, 2008, from http://www.tamuk.edu/sacs/newsacs/pdfs/Mastdoc/other/ACRL.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bayraktaroglu G. & Özgen, Ö. (2008). Integrating the Kano model, AHP and planning matrix; QFD application in library services, Library Management, 29(4/5), 327.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bhola, L. K. & Mishra, S. (1995, January/April). Dependency Quotient: A Tool for Collection Evaluation. Herald of Library Science , 34, nos. 1-2, 62-65.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chin, K. S. & Pun, K. F. & Leung, W. M. & Lau, H. (2001). A quality function deployment approach for improving technical library and information services: A case study, Library Management, 22(4/5), 195.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Christiansen, D. E. & Davis C. R. & Jutta R. S. (1983). Guide to Collection Evaluation Through Use and User Studies, Library Resources & Technical Services, 27.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Christiansen, D. E. & Davis, C. R. & Reed-Scott, J. (1983). Guide to collection evaluation through use and user studies, Library Resources & Technical Services, 27, 435.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Coffee, M. (2005, March/April). How we proved our library`s value with an ROI assessment. Marketing Library Services, 19(2), 1-3, 5.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dennison, R. F. (2000). Quality Assessment of Collection Development Through Tiered Checklists: Can You Prove You Are a Good Collection ? Collection Building, 19(1), 24-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Evans, G. E. & Saponaro, M. Z. (2005). Developing library and information center collections (5th ed). Libraries Unlimited.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Evans, G. E. (1995). Developing library and information center collection (3rd ed). Englewood, Co.: Libraries Unlimited.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Evans, G. E. (2004). Developing Library & Informat.centre Collections (4th ed). Greenwood Publishing Group.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Evans, J. R. & Lindsay, W. M. (2002). The Management and Control of Quality (5th ed). Thomson South-Western.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Flaherty, B. (2002. February). Assessing Legal Collections: Trying to Eke Out a Method from the Madness. Against the Grain, 14, 66-68, 70.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fussler, H. H. & Simon, J. L. (1969). Patterns in the use of books in large research libraries. Chicago. University of Chicago, 3. (Quoted from Kent A. and others(1979). Use of library materials: The University of Pittsburgh study. New York. Marcel Dekker Inc, 31)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Greer, A. T. (2002). A model for the delivery and evaluation of asynchronous and interactive synchronous library services at Southern Adventist University (Ph.D., Nova Southeastern University, 2002).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Griffin, P. S. (1996). Faculty Surveys of Collections, Roanoke Bible College, May-September 1995. Christian Librarian, 39, 25-27, 30.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hall, B. H. (1985). Collection Assessment Manual for College and University Libraries. Phoenix, AZ : Oryx.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Halliday, B. (2001). Identifying Library Policy Issues with List Checking. In Danny P. W. & Connie V. F.(Eds.), Library Evaluation: A Case book and Can-Do Guide. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Harrell, J. (1992). Use of the OCLC/AMIGOS Collection Analysis CD to Determine Comparative Collection Strength in English and American Literature: A Case Study. Technical Services Quarterly, 9(3), 1-14.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jain, A. K. (1969). Sampling and data collection methods for a book-use study, Library Quarterly, 39, 245.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Katz, W. A. (1980). Collection development: The selection of materials for libraries. New York: Holt, Rinchart & Winston.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kent , A. (1979). Use of Library Materials: The University of Pittsburgh Study, New York: Marcel Dekker, 13.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lancaster, F. W.(1988). If you want to evaluate your library. Champaign IL: University of Illinois.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lancaster, F. W.(1992), The measurement and evaluation of library services. Washington, D. C.: Information Resource Press, 80.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Leng, Y. L. (1995). The Development of the Book Collection is Not Well Planned: Practising Collection Evaluation. Singapore Libraries, 24, 20-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Levine, M. (1980). Measuring Circulation/ acquisition ratio: an input-output measure for libraries. Information Processing and Management, 16(16), 313-315.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Loertscher, D. V. (1996). Collection Mapping in the LMC: Building Access in a World of Technology. San Jose, CA: Hi Willow Research and Publishing.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Marsh, K. & Arbogast, L. (2007). Plan Your Library. 2007 Annual Conference of Virginia Educational Media Association.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mazur, G. (2003). Voice of the customer (define): QFD to define value. Annual Quality Congress, 57, 151-157.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McInnis, R. M. (1972). The Formula Approach to Library Size: An Empirical Study of Its Efficacy in Evaluation Research Libraries, College & Research Libraries, 33(92).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mosher, P. H. (1980). Collection evaluation or Analysis: Matching Library Acquisitions to Library Needs, in Collection Development in Libraries : A Treatise, Part B .Greenwich: JAI, 529-530.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nancy V. H. and Others (1987). Output measures for public libraries: A manual of standardized procedures (2nd ed). Chicago: American Library Association.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nisonger, T. E. (1997). Electronic journal collection management issue. Collection Building, 16(2), 62.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nisonger, T. E. (2003). Evaluation of library collections, access, and electronic resources : a literature guide and annotated bibliography. Westport, Conn. : Libraries Unlimited.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pall, R. & Peter T. B. (1996). Measuring quality: International guidelines for performance measurement in academic libraries. Munchen: K.G. Saur.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Perkins, D. L. (1979). Characteristics of References in Selected Scholar English Literary Journals, Library Quarterly, 50.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rao, S. N. (1993). Meeting Modern Demands of Collection Evaluation: A New Approach. Collection Building 13(1), 33-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sweetland, J. H. & Christensen, G. P. (1997, March). Developing Language and Literature Collections in Academic Libraries: A Survey. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 23, 119-125.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zweizig, D.& Rodger, E. J. (1982). Output measures for public libraries: A manual of standardized procedures. Chicago: American Library Association.zh_TW