學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 負面攻擊下內部升遷制度之改善
作者 孫瑋廷
貢獻者 王智賢
孫瑋廷
關鍵詞 晉升
負面攻擊
異質
同質
日期 2004
上傳時間 14-九月-2009 13:44:30 (UTC+8)
摘要 在相關之傳統職位晉升的研究中,多數只有討論一位員工獲得晉升的情況。Chen(2003)建立一模型,分析當員工彼此間具有負面攻擊競爭對手的情形下,得到正面實力最強的員工遭遇到其他競爭對手最多的負面總攻擊現象,易造成正面能力最強的員工不易獲得晉升的結果。本文則考慮當獲得晉升的員工不只一位時之狀況,發現當員工能力異質時,晉升超過一位員工之制度將使正面能力最強之員工較不會獲得最多之負面攻擊而易於獲得晉升;但當員工能力同質時,只晉升一位員工是對公司最有利的制度。
參考文獻 Baker, G., M. Gibbs and B. Holmstorm (1994),“The Internal Economics of a Firm:Evidence from Personal Data,”Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 881-919.
Bognanno, M. L. (1999), “Corporate Tournament, ”Journal of LaboEconomics, 19, 290-315.
Chen, K.-P. (2005), “External Recruitment as an Incentive Device, ”Journal of Labor Economics, forthcoming.
Chen, K. -P. (2003), “Sabotage in Promotion Tournaments,”Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 19, 119-140.
DeVaro, J. (2002), “Promotion Tournament in Real Firms, ”mimeo, Cornell University.
Eriksson, T. (1999),“Executive Compensation and Tournament Theory: Empirical Test on Danish Data, ”Journal of Labor Economics, 17, 262-80.
Green, J. and N. Stokey (1983),“A Comparison of Tournaments and Contracts, ”Journal of Political Economy, 91, 349-64.
Harring, J. J. and G. D. Hess (1996), “A Spatial Theory of Positive and Negative Campaigning, ” Games and Economic Behavior, 17, 209-29.
Hvide, H. K. (2002), “Tournament and risk taking, ” Journal of Labor Economics, 20, 877-98.
Lazear, E. P. and S. Rosen (1981), “Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts, ”Journal of Political Economy, 89, 841-64.
Malcomson, J. (1984), “Work incentives, hierarchy, and internal labor markets. ” Journal of Political Economy, 89, 841-64.
Prendergast, C. (1993), “The role of promotion in including specific human capital, ” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 528-34.
Skaperdas, S. and B. Grofman (1995), “Modeling Negative Campaigning, ”American Political Science Review, 89, 49-61.
Zabojnik, J. and D. Bernhardt ( 2001 ), “Corporate tournaments, human capital acquisition, and the firm size-wage relaion, ” Review of Economic studies, 68, 693-716.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政研究所
92255023
93
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0922550231
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 王智賢zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 孫瑋廷zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 孫瑋廷zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned 14-九月-2009 13:44:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 14-九月-2009 13:44:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 14-九月-2009 13:44:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0922550231en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32362-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92255023zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在相關之傳統職位晉升的研究中,多數只有討論一位員工獲得晉升的情況。Chen(2003)建立一模型,分析當員工彼此間具有負面攻擊競爭對手的情形下,得到正面實力最強的員工遭遇到其他競爭對手最多的負面總攻擊現象,易造成正面能力最強的員工不易獲得晉升的結果。本文則考慮當獲得晉升的員工不只一位時之狀況,發現當員工能力異質時,晉升超過一位員工之制度將使正面能力最強之員工較不會獲得最多之負面攻擊而易於獲得晉升;但當員工能力同質時,只晉升一位員工是對公司最有利的制度。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 1、前言……………………………………..……………………………1
     2、文獻回顧………………………………..……………………………4
     3、模型……………………………………..……………………………6
      3.1 基本假設………………………....…………………………….6
      3.2 N搶1……………………………...…………………………...7
      3.3 N搶N-1………...…………………...…………………………9
      3.4 三搶二………………………………………………………...13
      3.5 延伸討論:N搶N-2...………………………………………….16
      3.6 能力同質……………………………………………………...18
     4、結論…………………………………………………………………23
     附錄一…………………………………………………………………..25
     附錄二…………………………………………………………………..40
     參考文獻………………………………………………………………..54
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0922550231en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 晉升zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 負面攻擊zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 異質zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 同質zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 負面攻擊下內部升遷制度之改善zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baker, G., M. Gibbs and B. Holmstorm (1994),“The Internal Economics of a Firm:Evidence from Personal Data,”Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 881-919.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bognanno, M. L. (1999), “Corporate Tournament, ”Journal of LaboEconomics, 19, 290-315.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chen, K.-P. (2005), “External Recruitment as an Incentive Device, ”Journal of Labor Economics, forthcoming.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chen, K. -P. (2003), “Sabotage in Promotion Tournaments,”Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 19, 119-140.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DeVaro, J. (2002), “Promotion Tournament in Real Firms, ”mimeo, Cornell University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eriksson, T. (1999),“Executive Compensation and Tournament Theory: Empirical Test on Danish Data, ”Journal of Labor Economics, 17, 262-80.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Green, J. and N. Stokey (1983),“A Comparison of Tournaments and Contracts, ”Journal of Political Economy, 91, 349-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Harring, J. J. and G. D. Hess (1996), “A Spatial Theory of Positive and Negative Campaigning, ” Games and Economic Behavior, 17, 209-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hvide, H. K. (2002), “Tournament and risk taking, ” Journal of Labor Economics, 20, 877-98.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lazear, E. P. and S. Rosen (1981), “Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts, ”Journal of Political Economy, 89, 841-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Malcomson, J. (1984), “Work incentives, hierarchy, and internal labor markets. ” Journal of Political Economy, 89, 841-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Prendergast, C. (1993), “The role of promotion in including specific human capital, ” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 528-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Skaperdas, S. and B. Grofman (1995), “Modeling Negative Campaigning, ”American Political Science Review, 89, 49-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zabojnik, J. and D. Bernhardt ( 2001 ), “Corporate tournaments, human capital acquisition, and the firm size-wage relaion, ” Review of Economic studies, 68, 693-716.zh_TW