| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳彰儀 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (作者) | 張軒正 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (作者) | Hsuan-cheng Chang | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 張軒正 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Hsuan-cheng Chang | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2002 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 17-九月-2009 13:12:58 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 17-九月-2009 13:12:58 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-九月-2009 13:12:58 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) | G0090752001 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32477 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 90752001 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 91 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本研究欲探討在模擬甄選情境中，情境因素對降低社會期許之效果。本研究採三因子2×2×2受試者間之實驗設計，所操弄的三個獨變項為： 1.促發(priming)受試者誠實作答的傾向之有無 2.測謊題警告之有無 3.作答時間的限制之有無；依變項為社會期許正、負向題分數與三個人格測驗向度（適應性、親和性、審慎性）的分數。本研究分為研究一、研究二兩階段進行。研究一之受試者包括企業應徵者81人與國小實習老師92人，研究結果顯示：三個獨變項中，只在有「測謊題警告」情境下能顯著降低社會期許正向題的分數。「時間限制」則在無「促發」之情況下，會提升「親和性」人格之分數。針對研究一的結果，研究者改變「促發」與「時間限制」的操弄方式，其它研究程序相同，進行研究二。研究二之受試者為503位大學生，研究結果顯示：「促發」會提升社會期許負向題的分數，且在有「時間限制」、無「警告」的情況下，亦可提升「適應性」分數。「測謊題警告」可降低社會期許正向題的分數，並有降低「親和性」分數之趨勢。「時間限制」仍然沒有任何效果。 研究者分別就研究一、研究二之結果加以討論並提出可能的解釋。此外，研究者亦嘗試驗證與討論社會期許量表中正向題與負向題之建構。最後研究者檢討本研究之限制，並對未來之研究方向提出若干建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The influence of three situational factors on reducing social desirability bias under simulated selection context was investigated in 2 studies. A 2×2×2 experimental design was used in these 2 studies. The three independent variables were: 1.’’Priming’’ the honest responding tendency. 2.Warning of having a lie scale. 3.Time limit for each question. The dependent variables included: 1.Two dimension scores of social desirability scale (positive keying items and negative keying items). 2.Scores of three personality dimensions (adjustment, likeability, prudence). Subjects of study1 were 81 job applicants and 92 elementary school interns. The results indicated that “warning of having a lie scale” could reduce the scores of positive keying social desirability scale. “Time limit” increased the scores of “likeability” under “no priming” situation. According to the results of study1, the author modified the manipulations of “priming” and “time limit”, and conducted study2. The subjects of study2 were 503 college students. The results indicated that “priming” could increase the scores of negative keying social desirability scale. “Priming” also increased the scores of “adjustment” under “time limit” and “no warning” situation. “Warning of having a lie scale” could reduce the scores of positive keying social desirability scale, and also had the trend to reduce the scores of “likeability”. “Time limit” still didn’t have any main effect on dependent measures. Base on the results for study1 and study2, the author discussed the effects of 3 situational factors on reducing social desirability bias, and also tried to clarify the construct validity of two-dimensional social desirability scale. The author also discussed the limitations of the present research, and made some suggestions for future research. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄第一章 緒論第一節 研究動機與目的 1第二節 文獻探討 5一、 社會期許的概念 5二、 社會期許偏誤對測驗效度的影響 7三、 作假模式 8四、 控制或降低社會期許偏誤的策略 9五、 促發作用與社會期許偏誤 14六、 人格特質與社會期許偏誤 18第三節 研究架構與研究假設 20第二章 研究一第一節 研究方法 24一、 研究對象 24二、 實驗設計 24三、 實驗操弄方式 26四、 變項與測量工具 28五、 研究步驟 30六、 受試者填答電腦問卷之步驟 31七、 資料分析方法 32第二節 研究結果與討論 33一、 操弄變項之檢驗 33二、 隨機分派檢驗 34三、 研究問題之驗證 35四、 討論 42第三章 研究二第一節 研究方法 44一、 研究對象 44二、 實驗設計 44三、 實驗操弄方式 44四、 變項與測量工具 45五、 研究步驟 45六、 受試者填答電腦問卷之步驟 46七、 資料分析方法 46第二節 研究結果與討論 47一、 操弄變項之檢驗 47二、 隨機分派之檢驗 48三、 研究問題之驗證 48四、 討論 56第四章 其它研究結果、綜合討論與建議第一節 研究一與研究二的其它研究結果 61第二節 綜合討論 68一、 本研究結果與陳彰儀（2002）研究結果之比較 68二、 企業樣本、實習老師樣本、學生樣本之比較 71三、 社會期許負向題與正向題之建構效度 72四、 降低作假傾向之策略對三個人格變項之影響不同 73第三節 研究限制與檢討 75第四節 對未來研究之建議 79第五節 研究貢獻 81參考文獻 83附錄一 問卷題目 88附錄二 電腦問卷之畫面 95圖表目錄圖1-1 McFarland and Ryan（2000）的作假模式 9圖1-2 本研究的架構圖 21圖2-1 時間限制與促發對親和性總分之交互作用圖 40圖3-1 促發、警告、時間限制對適應性總分之單純交互作用圖 53表2-1 企業與實習老師在各變項上的平均數差異 36表2-2 三個獨變項對社會期許負向題之三因子變異數分析摘要表 36表2-3 受試者針對社會期許負向題的整體反應平均值 37表2-4 三個獨變項對社會期許正向題之三因子變異數分析摘要表 37表2-5 受試者針對社會期許正向題的整體反應平均值 37表2-6 三個獨變項對「適應性」之三因子變異數分析摘要表 38表2-7 受試者針對「適應性」的整體反應平均值 39表2-8 三個獨變項對「親和性」之三因子變異數分析摘要表 39表2-9 受試者針對「親和性」的整體反應平均值 39表2-10 三個獨變項對「審慎性」之三因子變異數分析摘要表 40表2-11 受試者針對「審慎性」的整體反應平均值 40表2-12 研究一之假設與結果對應表 41表3-1 三個獨變項對社會期許負向題之三因子變異數分析摘要表 49表3-2 受試者針對社會期許負向題的整體反應平均值 50表3-3 三個獨變項對社會期許正向題之三因子變異數分析摘要表 50表3-4 受試者針對社會期許正向題的整體反應平均值 50表3-5 三個獨變項對「適應性」之三因子變異數分析摘要表 52表3-6 受試者針對「適應性」的整體反應平均值 52表3-7 三個獨變項對「親和性」之三因子變異數分析摘要表 54表3-8 受試者針對「親和性」的整體反應平均值 54表3-9 三個獨變項對「審慎性」之三因子變異數分析摘要表 54表3-10 受試者針對「審慎性」的整體反應平均值 55表3-11 研究二之假設與結果對應表 55表4-1 三個獨變項對社會期許負向題之三因子變異數分析摘要表 62表4-2 受試者針對社會期許負向題的整體反應平均值 62表4-3 三個獨變項對「適應性」之三因子變異數分析摘要表 62表4-4 受試者針對「適應性」的整體反應平均值 63表4-5 企業、實習老師、學生樣本在各變項上之平均數 64表4-6 樣本來源對社會期許正向題之單因子變異數分析摘要表 65表4-7 樣本來源對社會期許負向題之單因子變異數分析摘要表 65表4-8 樣本來源對「親和性」之單因子變異數分析摘要表 65表4-9 樣本來源對「審慎性」之單因子變異數分析摘要表 65表4-10 各依變項之相關矩陣（企業＋實習老師樣本） 66表4-11 各依變項之相關矩陣（學生樣本） 66表4-12 各依變項之相關矩陣（全部樣本） 67 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 15199 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 23000 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 21841 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 44387 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 115213 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 363611 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 291725 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 312617 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 48819 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 248823 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090752001 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 降低社會期許 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 促發 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 傳記式問卷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 測謊題警告 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 時間限制 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 電腦施測 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | reducing social desirability | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | priming | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | biodata | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | warning of having a lie scale | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | time limit | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | computer administration | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 在電腦施測情境中，促發、警告、時間限制對降低社會期許之效果 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Reducing social desirability bias of personality scale in computer administration mode: Effects of priming, warning, and time limit | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 參考文獻 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中文部分 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林以正、廖玲燕、黃金蘭、楊中芳 (2001)。本土社會讚許傾向的測量與歷程。華人本土心理學追求卓越計畫。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 范淑儀（1998）。自我的反省與覺察。台北：輔仁大學碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳彰儀（2002）。網路應徵者填寫測驗的作假行為：情境因素與測驗類型的影響。國科會專題研究。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃康齡（1990）。以自陳式量表衡量業務人員人格特質之研究。台中：東海大學碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 楊淑珍（1983）。我國大學生生理性行為之評量與分析。台北：台灣教育學院碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 楊順興（1996）。情境焦慮、自尊對自我欺騙之影響。台北：政治大學碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 葉光輝（1983）。人情取向、分配方式與工作表現。台北：台灣大學碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 英文部分 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bargh, J. A. (1982). Attention and automaticity in the processing of self-relevant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1040-1053. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893-912. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P., & Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditionally automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 104-128. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bargh, J. A., & Tota, M. E. (1988). Context-dependent automatic processing in depression: Accessibility of negative constructs with regard to self but not others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 925-939. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Barrick, M., & Mount, M. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Becker, T. E., & Colquitt, A. L. (1992). Potential versus actual faking of a biodata form: An analysis along several dimensions of item type. Personnel Psychology, 45, 389-406. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cascio, W. F. (1998). Applied Psychology in Personnel Management (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N. J: Prentice-Hall, Inc. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Crowne, D. P. & Marlowe, D. A. (1965). The approval motive. New York: Wiley | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Christiansen, N. D., Goffin, R. D., Johnston, N. G., & Rothstein, M. G. (1994). Correcting the 16PF for faking: Effects on criterion-related validity and individual hiring decisions. Personnel Psychology, 47, 847-860. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of Trivial Pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 865-877. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Doll, R. E. (1971). Item susceptibility to attempted faking as related to item characteristic and adopted fake set. Journal of Psychology, 77, 9-16. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Douglas, E. F., McDaniel, M. A., & Snell, A. F. (1996). The Validity of Non-cognitive Measures Decays When Applicants Fake. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati, OH. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ellingson, J. E., Sackett, P. R., & Hough , L. M. (1999). Social desirability corrections in personality measurement: Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 84, 155-166. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fox, S., & Schwartz, D. (2002). Social desirability and controllability in computerized and paper-and-pencil personality questionnaires. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 389-410. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gatewood, R. D., & Field, H. S. (2001). Human Resource Selection(5th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt College Publishers. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Greenberger, D. B., & Strasser, S. (1991). The role of situational and dispositional factors in the enhancement of personal control in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 111-145. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hogan, J. B., & Strokes, G. S. (1989, April). The influence of socially desirable responding on biographical data of applicant versus incumbent samples: Implications for predictive and concurrent research designs. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Boston, MA. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hogan, R. T. (1991). Personality and personality measurement. In M. Dunnette and L. Hough (eds.). The Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd ed.), Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effects of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581-595. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jones, E. E., & Sigall, H. (1971). The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitutde. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 349-364. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Klein, C. TF., & Helweg-Larsen, M. (2002). Perceived control and the optimistic bias: A meta-analytic review. Psychology-and-Health, 17, 437-446. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Klein, S. P. & Owens, W. A. (1965). Faking of a scored life history blank as a function of criterion objectivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 452-454. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kluger, A. N., Reilly, R. R., & Russell, C. J. (1991). Faking biodata tests: Are option-keyed instruments more resistant? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 889-896. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kluger, A. N. & Collella, A. (1993) Beyond the mean bias: The effect of warning against faking on biodata item variances. Personnel Psychology, 46, 763-780. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882-888. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDaniel, M. A., & Timm, H. (1990, August). Lying takes time: Predicting deception in biodata using response latencies. Paper presented at the 98th Annual Convention of American Psychological Association, Boston, MA. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McFarland, L. A. & Ryan, A. M. (2000). Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 812-821. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McGuire, W. J. (1969). Artifact in Behavioral Research, Academic Press, New York. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McManus, M. A. (1990, April). Detection of faking on an empirically keyed biodata instrument. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Miami, FL. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of experimental psychology, 90, 227-234. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mumford, M. D. & Stokes, G. S. (1992). Developmental determinants of individual action: Theory and practice in applying background measures. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.). Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd ed., Vol 3). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ones, D., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 78, 679-703. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660-679. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Paulhus, D. L. (1986). Self-deception and impression management in test responses. In A. Angleiner & J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality Assessment via Questionnaire. New York: Springer. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 160, 307-317. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Potosky, D., & Bobko, P. (1997). Computer versus paper-and-pencil administration mode and response distortion in noncognitive selection tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 293-299. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Richman, W. L., Kiesler, S., Weisband, S., & Drasgow, F. (1999). A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 754-775. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rosse, J. G.., Stecher, M. D., Miller, J. L., & Levin, R. A. (1998). The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 634-644. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schneider, w., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processimg: I Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schrader, A. D. & Osburn, H. G. (1977). Biodata faking: Effects of induced subtlety and position specificity. Personnel Psychology, 30, 395-404. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(4), 1492-1512. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Strauman, T. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1987). Automatic activation of self-discrepancies and emotional syndromes: When cognitive structures influence affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1004-1014. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Thompson, S. C., & Spacapan, S. (1991). Perceptions of control in vulnerable populations. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 1-21. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Vasilopoulos, N. L., Reilly, R. R., & Leaman, J. A. (2000). The influence of job familiarity and impression management on self-report measure scale scores and response latencies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 50-64. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yang, C. F. (1997). Study on underlying psychological processes of social desirability scores. Unpublished manuscript. | zh_TW |
