dc.contributor.advisor | 許文耀 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 鍾昭瑛 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | 鍾昭瑛 | zh_TW |
dc.date (日期) | 2005 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 17-Sep-2009 13:13:46 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 17-Sep-2009 13:13:46 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Sep-2009 13:13:46 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0091752019 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32483 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 91752019 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 94 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Baumeister等人回顧一系列攻擊行為的研究中發現,「自負特質」(Egotism)者若面對外在評價遠低於自我評價的情境時,可能會針對外在評價來源者產生憤怒情緒,因而增加攻擊行為發生的危險性。同時他也發現自戀特質與性犯罪之間具有關聯性,個體的自戀狀態易使其過度高估自己,當被拒絕時,極易導致自我調控的失敗,在情緒上會以表露敵意與憤怒為主,在行為上則傾向對拒絕者做出反擊,目的是回復被貶抑的自尊並獲得對他人的象徵性支配。 本研究的主要目的是以Baumeister的觀點編製「情境式自負特質量表」,並藉以探討於Beech與Ward(2004)所提的危險性病因模式下,自負特質是否比自戀特質更能預測性犯罪者的攻擊行為與再犯? 本研究自編的情境式自負特質量表的信度為.98,顯示其具有良好的內部一致性,在效度分析上,本量表與效標量表間也具有高度的相關。經由因素分析之後,支持Baumeister(1996)的假設,亦即自負特質的內涵包括「易受傷害的-敏感的」、「誇大的-愛表現的」與「自尊的不穩定」等特性,而且在外界評價遠低於有利自評的威脅情境下,此種特質更為突顯。 在攻擊行為與自我調控能力的預測方面,本研究結果顯示情境式自負特質量表確實比自戀性格量表對攻擊行為與自我調控能力更具解釋力。在針對性犯罪再犯的預測上,自負特質與自戀特質都無法直接與性犯罪再犯評估的結果有關聯,但根據Beech與Ward(2004)的看法,自負特質應可做為性犯罪再犯的心理傾向之一,此心理傾向影響的是性犯罪者的自我調控能力,而自我調控能力又被視為性犯罪再犯因子中的穩定動態因子,當遇到情境的促發因子,則其再犯的風險也就隨之增高了。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論第一節 研究動機與目的.......................................1第二章 文獻探討第一節 國內外性犯罪研究的現況...............................3第二節 性犯罪者的危險評估...................................6第三節 性犯罪者的心理傾向與再犯的關係......................16第四節 「自負特質」的特性..................................22第五節 「自負特質」與性犯罪行為的關係......................26第六節 「自負特質」與性犯罪再犯的關係......................29第七節 研究問題............................................32第三章 研究方法第一節 研究對象............................................35第二節 研究工具............................................37第三節 研究程序............................................46第四節 資料分析............................................47第四章 研究結果第一節 研究工具之描述統計與信度............................49第二節 情境式自負特質量表的考驗............................50第三節 自我控制量表的考驗..................................54第四節 自負特質與自戀特質的比較............................57第五節 犯罪類型在特質與攻擊行為的差異分析..................61第六節 各主要變項與性犯罪再犯的分析........................64第五章 結論、討論與建議第一節 結論................................................67第二節 綜合討論............................................68第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向..............................74參考文獻.....................................................75附錄一 研究同意書...........................................83附錄二 研究量表(一)情境式自負特質量表.....................................84(二)自戀性格量表...........................................92(三)波氏攻擊量表...........................................96(四)自我控制量表...........................................97(五)靜態-99再犯評估量表....................................98附錄三 原文量表翻譯使用授權信函(一)Emmons博士的授權信函..................................100(二)Buss博士的授權信函....................................101(三)Baumeister博士的授權信函..............................103表目次表2-2-1:性犯罪再犯的靜態預測因子.............................7表2-2-2:性犯罪再犯的動態預測因子.............................9表2-2-3:性犯罪再犯的預測因子................................10表2-3-1:脆弱因子與情境因子的定義............................16表3-1-1:受試者的犯罪刑別....................................35表3-1-1:受試者教育程度、犯罪類型的分配......................36表3-2-1:「情境式自負特質量表」編製架構......................38表3-2-2:「情境式自負特質量表」各向度的反應內容..............39表3-2-3:前置問卷填答內容分類統計表..........................40表3-2-4:自我控制測量工具之比較..............................42表3-2-5:「靜態-99再犯評估量表」的評分者間信度...............45表4-1-1:研究工具的描述統計與信度............................49表4-2-1:「情境式自負特質量表」各情境及全量表之描述統計值....50表4-2-2:「情境式自負特質量表」各情境及全量表間相關..........50表4-2-3:「情境式自負特質量表」的內部一致性係數..............51表4-2-4:「情境式自負特質量表」因素分析解釋的變異量..........51表4-2-5:「自負特質」因素負荷量..............................52表4-2-6:「情境式自負特質量表」與效標量表之相關..............53表4-3-1:自我控制量表之描述統計值............................54表4-3-2:自我控制量表因素分析解釋的變異量....................54表4-3-3:自我調控因素負荷量..................................55表4-3-4:自我控制量表與效標量表之相關........................56表4-4-1:自負特質與自戀特質對於攻擊行為的解釋變異量..........57表4-4-2:自負特質、自戀特質與攻擊行為的相關..................57表4-4-3:自負特質、自戀特質對攻擊行為進行逐步迴歸分析之結果..58表4-4-4:自負特質、自戀特質與自我調控的相關..................59表4-4-5:自負特質與自戀特質對於自我調控的解釋變異量..........59表4-4-6:自負特質、自戀特質對自我調控進行逐步迴歸分析之結果..59表4-5-1:性犯罪者與非性暴力犯罪者在自負特質上之變異數分析摘要表...........................................................61表4-5-2:性犯罪者與非性暴力犯罪者在自戀特質上之變異數分析摘要表...........................................................61表4-5-3:性犯罪者與非性暴力犯罪者在攻擊行為上之變異數分析摘要表...........................................................62表4-5-4:不同程度的自負特質與攻擊行為之獨立樣本檢定..........62表4-6-1:靜態-99再犯評估量表-性犯罪再犯得分之描述統計........64表4-6-2:靜態-99再犯評估量表-暴力再犯得分之描述統計..........64表4-6-3:靜態-99再犯評估量表與其他量表之相關.................65表4-6-4:各主要變項對於性犯罪者性再犯預測的迴歸係數分析......65表4-6-5:各主要變項對於性犯罪者暴力再犯預測的迴歸係數分析....66圖目次圖2-2-1:危險性的病因模式....................................14 | zh_TW |
dc.format.extent | 47695 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 76515 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 78279 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 99487 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 90032 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 270743 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 239188 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 195913 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 139182 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 98090 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 280144 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091752019 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 性犯罪 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 性犯罪者 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 自負特質 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 再犯因子 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | 性犯罪者的「自負特質」與再犯因子的關係 | zh_TW |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、中文部分 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 呂寶靜(民81)。工作場所性騷擾之研究:台灣地區案例探討。國立政治大學學報,70,131-158。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳若璋(民83) 大學性騷擾、侵害經驗特性之研究報告。中華心理衛生學刊,7(1),77-96。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳若璋(民81)。性騷擾,他們是誰,我們又要討論什麼?。新竹風,12。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許春金(民81)。強暴犯罪型態與加害者人格特性之實證研究。台北市研考會專案研究報告。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃軍義(民84)。強姦犯罪之訪談研究—相關成因概念模型之建立。法務部。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳若璋(民90)。台灣性加害人特質與形成因素之回顧論文。發表於中華民國犯罪學學會暴力研討會,中正大學犯罪防治研究所。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 羅燦煐(1996)。解構迷思,奪回暗夜:性暴力之現況與防治。台灣婦女處境白皮書的性暴力篇,頁257-308。台北:台北文化叢書。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃富源(1995)。婦女人身安全之檢視。邁向二十一世紀婦女政策系列研討會婦女問題的檢視與前瞻。台北:中國國民黨中央婦女工作會、婦女政策研究發展中心。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳炯旭、周孫元(2004)。妨害性自主罪受刑人之再犯率以及再犯危險因子。九十三年度行政院衛生署所屬醫院研究發展計畫獎勵之成果報告書。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳若璋、劉志如、王家駿(民91)。性暴力連續犯危險因子分析研究。女學學誌—婦女與性別研究,第1期,1-38。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉樹斐(民89)。自尊的多面向對大學生憂鬱與攻擊行為的影響。國立政治大學心理學系碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、英文部分 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Abel, G. G., Gore, D. K., Holland, C. L., Camp, N., Becker, J. V., & Rathner, J. (1989). The measurement of the cognitive distortions of child molesters. Annals of Sex Research, 2, 135-153. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Abel , G. G., & Rouleau, J.-L. (1990). The nature and extent of sexual assault. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: issues, theories, and treatment of the offender(pp.9-21). New York: Plenum. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M. (1996). Relation of Threatened Egotism to Violence and Aggression: The Dark Side of High Self-Esteem. Psychological Review, 103(1), 5-33. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., Wallace, H. M. (2002). Conquest by Force: A Narcissistic Reactance Theory of Rape and Sexual Coercion. Review of General Psychology, 6(1), 92-135. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-Regulation Failure: An Overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7(1), 1-15. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., Tice, D. M. (1994). When Ego Threats Lead to Self-Regulation Failure: Negative Consequences of High Self-Esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 141-156. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Beech, A. R., Fisher, D. D., Thornton, D. (2003). Risk Assessment of Sex Offenders. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34(4), 339–352. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Beech, A. R., & Ward, T. (2004). The integration of etiology and risk in sexual offenders: A theorectical framework. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 31-63. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 59-73. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Berkowitz, L. (1994). Is something missing? Some observations prompted by the cognitive-neoassociationist view of anger and emotional aggression. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive Behavior: Current Perdpectives. New York:Plenum Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Boer, D. P., Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., Webster, C. D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk Scale-20. Obtainable from the Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bumby, K. M., Marshall, W. L., & Langton, C. M. (1999). A theoretical formulation of the influences of shame and guilt on sexual offending. In B. Schwartz & H. Cellini (Eds.), The sex offender (Vol. 3). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bushman, B. J., Baumeister, R. F., Phillips, C. M. (2001).Do People Aggress to Improve Their Mood? Catharsis Beliefs, Affect Regulation Opportunity, and Aggressive Responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 17-32. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bushman, B. J., Bonacci, A. M., Mirjam van Dijk, Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Narcissism, Sexual Refusal, and Aggression: Testing a Narcissistic Reactance Model of Sexual Coercion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1027-1040. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bushman, B. B., Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened Egotism, Narcissism, Self-Esteem, and Direct and Displaced Aggression: Does Self-Love or Self-Hate Lead to Violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 219-229. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111-135. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cornell, G. D., Peterson, C. S., & Richard, H. (1999). Anger as a predictor of aggression among incarcerated adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67,108-115. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Costello B. J., & Dunaway R. G. (2003). Egotism and Delinquent Behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(5), 572-590. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Craissati, J., & Beech, A. (2003). A review of dynamic variables and their relationship to risk prediction in sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 9(1), 41-55. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dean, K. E., & Malamuth, N. M. (1997). Characteristics of Men Who Aggress Sexually and of Men Who Imagine Aggressing: Risk and Moderating Variables. Journal of Personaligy and Social Psychology, 72(2), 449-455. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Don, G. (1997). Predictors of Risk in Serious Sex Offenders. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 170(32), 17-21. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Emmons, R. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and Measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 11-17. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Epperson, D. L., Kaul, J. D., Huot, S. J., Hesselton, D., Alexander, W., & Goldman, R. (1999). Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R): Development, performance, and recommended risk level cut scores. Retrieved from http://www.psychology.iastate.edu/faculty/homepage.htm. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York: The Free Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hall, G. C. N., & Hirschman, R. (1992). Sexual aggression against children: A conceptual perspective of etiology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 19, 8-23. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hall, G. C. N. (1995). The Preliminary Development of Theory-Based Community Treatment for Sexual Offenders. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26(5), 478-483. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual offender recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. (User Report 2004-04). Ottawa: Department of Solicitor General of Canada. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hanson R. K. & Harris Andrew J. R. (2001). A Structured Approach to Evaluating Change Among Sexual Offenders.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13(2), 105-122. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hanson, R. K. (2001). Sex offender risk assessment. In C. R. Hollin (Ed.), Handbook of Offender Assessment and Treatment (pp.85-96). New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6-35. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2001). The Sex Offender Need Assessment Rating (SONAR): A method for measuring change in risk levels. (User Report 2000-01). Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static-99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders. (User Report 99-02). Ottawa: Department of Solicitor General of Canada. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1996). Predictors of sexual offender recidivism: A meta-analysis. (User Report 96-04). Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998a). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hanson, R. K., Morton, K. E., & Harris, A. J. R. (2003). Sexual offender recidivism risk: What we know and what we need to know. In R. A. Prentky, E. S. Janus, & M. C. Seto (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Vol. 989. Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management (pp. 154–166). New York: New York Academy of Sciences. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hazaleus, S. L., Deffenbacher, J. L. (1986). Relaxation and cognitive treatments of anger. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(2), 222-226. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Heatherton, T. F., & Ploivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personaligy and social Psychology, 60, 895-910. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Howells, K. (1989). Anger measurement methods in relation to the prevention of violent behavior. In J. Archer and K. Browne (Eds.), Human Aggression: Naturalistic approach.London; New York: Routledge. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Johnson, H., & Sacco, V. F. (1995). Researching violence against women: Statistics Canada’s national survey. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 281-304. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kanin, E. J. (1985). Date rapists: Differential sexual socialization and relative deprivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 219–231. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kernis, M. H., Cornell, D. F., Sun, C. R., Berry, A., & Harlow, T. (1993). There’s more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem. Journal of Personaligy and Social Psychology, 65, 1190-1240. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kroner, D. G., Reddon, J. R. (1992). The multidimensional anger inventory: Reality and factor structure in an inmate sample.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(3), 687-693. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lisak, D., & Roth, S. (1988). Motivational Factors in Nonincarcerated Sexually Aggressive Men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 55(5), 795-802. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Maiuro, R. D., Cahn, T. S., Vitaliano, P. P., Wagner, B. C., Zegree, J. B. (1988). Anger, hostility, and depression in domestically violent versus generally assaultive men and nonviolent control subjects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(1), 17-23. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Marshall, W. L., & Barbaree, H. E. (1990). An integrated theory of the etioloty of sexual offending. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender(pp.257-275). New York: Plenum. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Malamuth, N. M. (1986). Predictors of Naturalistic Sexual Aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 50(5), 953-962. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Malamuth, N. M., Sockloskie, R. J., Koss, M. P. & Tanaka, J. S. (1991). Characteristics of Aggressors Against Women: Testing a Model Using a National Sample of College Students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(5), 670-681. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Marques, J. K., Wiederanders, M., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., & Ommeren, A.V. (2005). Effects of a Relapse Prevention Program on Sexual Recidivism: Final Results From California’s Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Project(SOTEP). Sexual Abuse: A Jouranl of Research and Treatment, 17(1), 79-107. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Murphy, W. D. (1990). Assessment and modification of cognitive distortions in sex offenders. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender(pp. 331-342). New York: Plenum. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Neidigh, L., & Krop, H. (1992). Cognitive distortions among child sexual offenders. Journal of sex Education and Therapy, 18, 208-215. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Perry, A. H., Buss, A. M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452-459. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Polaschek, D. L. L., & Hudson, S. M. (2004). Pathways to rape: Preliminary examination of patterns in the offence processes of rapists and their rehabilitation implications. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 10(1), 7-20. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pollock, N. L., & Hashmall, J. M. (1991). The excuses of child molesters. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 9, 53-59. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Prentky, R.A., & Burgess, A.W. (2000). Forensic management of sexual offenders. New York: Kluwer/Plenum. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Raskin, R., H. T. (1988). A Principal-Components Analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and Further Evidence of Its Construct Validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890-902. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Scully, D. (1990). Understanding sexual violence: a study of convicted rapists. Boston: Unwin Hyman. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Steele, C. M. (1988). The Psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). New York: Academic Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tafarodi, R. W., & Swann, W. B. Jr. (1995). Self-liking and self-competence as dimensions of globalo self-esteem: Initial validation of a Measure. Journal of Personaligy Assessment, 65, 322-342. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tangney, J. P. (1995). Shame and guilt in interpersonal relationships. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: Shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride ( pp.114-139). New York: Guilford Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., Boone, A. L. (2004). High Self-Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success. Journal of Personaligy, 72(2), 272-324. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tedsechi, J. T. & Felson, R. B. (1994). Violence, aggression, and coercive actions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Thornton, D., Mann, R., Webster, S., Blud, L., Travers, R., Friendship, C. & Erikson, M. (2003). Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 225-235. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ward, T., & Beech, A. R. (2005). An integrated theory of sexual offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(1), 44-63. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., Johnston, L., & Marshall, W. L. (1998). cognitive distortions in sex offenders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 479-507. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ward, T., & Siegert, R. J. (2002). Toward and comprehensive theory of child sexual abuse: A theory knitting perspective. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 9, 319-351. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ward, T. & Keenan, T. (1999). Child molesters`s implicit theories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 821-838. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1982). Symbolic self-completion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wink, P. (1991). Two Faces of Narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 590-597. | zh_TW |