dc.contributor.advisor | 邱美秀 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 柴芸芸 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Chai, Yun Yun | en_US |
dc.creator (作者) | 柴芸芸 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | Chai, Yun Yun | en_US |
dc.date (日期) | 2007 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 17-Sep-2009 15:01:36 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 17-Sep-2009 15:01:36 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Sep-2009 15:01:36 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0093152034 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32985 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 教育研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 93152034 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 96 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本研究之目的在發展「大學生學科創造性成就問卷」,並經由研究分析瞭解大學生在各學科領域創造性成就之現況。本研究共計回收台灣地區大學生534份問卷,分析後發現(1)大學生之學科創造性成就、一般創造性成就、部分類別之創意生活經驗表現均偏低;(2)大學生學科創造性成就問卷有不錯之信度與效度;(3)因素分析上大學生學科創造性成就問卷可分為八類;(4)在總學科創造性成就與八類學科創造性成就上,除「科技與工程」和「音樂」無性別差異存在,其他均有性別差異存在。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The purpose of this research is to develop College Students’ Academic Creative Achievement Questionnaire (CSACAQ), and to assess college students’ academic creative achievements. Five hundred and thirty-four questionnaires were collected. Major findings include (1) College students’ academic creative achievements, creative achievements, and creative life experiences are low. (2) The reliability and validity of the CSACAQ are quite good. (3) The results of factor analyses show that the CSACAQ includes eight subscale. (4) There are differences between genders and students from different departments in total academic creative achievements and achievements of technology and music respectively. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………....1 第一節 研究動機.……………………………………………………………..1第二節 研究問題………………………………………………………………5第三節 研究限制………………………………………………………………6第四節 名詞解釋………………………………………………………………7第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………………8第一節 一般創造性成就之意涵………………………………………………8第二節 一般創造性成就之測量……………………………………………23第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………………35第一節 研究流程……………………………………………………………..35第二節 研究假設……………………………………………………………..36第三節 量表編製---題目之產生……………………………………………37第四節 量表施測……………………………………………………………..42第四章 研究結果………………………………………………………………..51第一節 大學生學科創造性成就、一般創造性成就、創意生活經驗之現 況………………………………………………………………51 第二節 大學生學科創造性成就、一般創造性成就、創意生活經驗之關係探 討…………………………..……………………………………….55第三節 大學生學科創造性成就與人口變項之關係探討…………………..59第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………………....63第一節 研究結論…………………………………………………………….63第二節 研究建議……………………………………………..………...66參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………..69中文部分……………………………………………………………………69英文部分……………………………………………………………………69附錄…………………………………………………………………………………77附錄一 訪談問卷與第一次分類……………………………………………..77附錄二 訪談摘要……………………………………………………………..85附錄三 第二次調查統計……………………………………………………..86附錄四 訪談摘要(二)...……………………………………………………93附錄五 問卷…………………………………........................95表 目 錄表3-1 編題之普遍性原則.………………………………………………………...41表3-2 正式施測樣本性別、年級與八類學生之交叉次數分配………................42表3-3 大學生學科創造性成就問卷之解說總變異量……………………………44表3-4 大學生學科創造性成就問卷之因素負荷量………………………………45表3-5 大學生學科創造性成就問卷之信度分析表………………………............48表3-6 一般創造性成就問卷之信度分析表……………………………………....49表3-7 創意生活經驗量表之信度分析表…………………………………............50表4-1 大學生學科創造性成就問卷之描述性統計分析表……............................53表4-2 一般創造性成就問卷之描述性統計分析表…………................................53表4-3 創意生活經驗量表之描述性統計分析表…………....................................54表4-4 大學生學科創造性成就問卷與一般創造性成就問卷之相關分析………56表4-5 大學生學科創造性成就問卷與創意生活經驗量表之相關分析…………57表4-6 大學生學科創造性成就問卷分量表與總量表間之相關分析………........58表4-7 性別在大學生學科創造性成就上的t考驗分析表..……………………59表4-8 系所類別在大學生學業創造性成就上的變異數分析表…………..........60表4-9 系所類別在大學生學科創造性成就上之事後比較分析表……………..61 | zh_TW |
dc.format.extent | 47524 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 207426 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 75169 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 127159 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 401131 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 716725 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 997001 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 484190 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 269060 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 118755 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 1016343 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093152034 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 創造力 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | 大學生學科創造性成就問卷之編製 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | The development of College Students’ Academic Creative Achievement Questionnaire | en_US |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 高之梅 (1998)。保護大學生免於採取自殺行動的信念。私立中原大學心理系碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳伯璋(2002)。知識之城:論我國大學角色與功能的再定位。九十一學年度教學與行政革新研討會。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 詹志禹(2002)。「創造力」的定義與創造力的發展。教育研究,100,117-124。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Academic Ranking of World Universities (2004). Top 500 world universities. Retrieved August 18, 2006, from http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/rank/2004/2004Main.htm | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Amabile, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. NY: Springer-Verlag. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Research, 25(4), 5-11. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 173-177. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and Creative process. NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Basadur, M., & Hausdorf, P. A. (1996). Measuring divergent thinking attitudes related to creative problem solving and innovation management. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 21-32. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Besemer, S. P. (1998). Creative Product Analysts Matrix Testing the model structure and a comparison among products-three novel chars. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 333-346. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Besemer, S. P., & O`Quin, K. (1987). Creative product analysis Testing a model by developing a judging instrument. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research beyond the basics (pp 367-389) Buffalo, NY: Bearly. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Besemer, S. P., & Treffinger, D. J. (1981). Analysis of creative products: Review and synthesis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 15, 158-178. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Besemer, S.P. & O’Quin, K. (1993). Assessing creative products: Progress and potentials. In S.G. Isaksen (Ed.), Nurturing and developing creativity: The emergence of a discipline, (pp. 331-349). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Briskman, L. (1980). Creative product and creative process in science and art. Inquiry, 23, 83-106. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brown, R. T. (1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In Glover. J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R.(Eds.), Handbook of Creativity (pp 3-30). NY: Plenum. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Buel, W. D. (1960). The validity of behavioral rating scale items for the assessment of individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 407-412. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37-50. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Colangelo, N., Kerr, B., Huesman, R, Hallowell. N., & Gaeth, J. (1992). The Iowa Inventiveness Inventory Toward a measure of mechanical inventiveness. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 157-164. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Conti, R., Coon, H., & Amabile, T. M. (1996). Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: Secondary analyses of three studies. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 385-389. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cramond, B & Bear, J. (1994). We can trust creativity tests. Educational Leadership, 52, 70-71. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Drevdahl, J. E. (1956). Factors of importance for creativity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12, 21-26. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Eysenck, H. J. (1996). The measurement of creativity. In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of Creativity (pp.199-235). MIT Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Feist, G. F. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Feist, G. J. (2002). The evolved fluid specificity of human creative talent. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity from Potential to Realization(pp. 57-82). Washinton DC: American Psychology Association. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition : Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Firestien, R. L. (1993). The power of product. In S. G., Isaksen, M. C., Murdock, R. L., Firestien, & D. J., Treffinger (Eds.), Nurturing and developing creativity: The Emergence of a Discipline.(pp.261-277) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Firestien, R. L., & Treffinger, D. J. (1983). Creative problems solving: Guidelines and resources for effective Facilitation. Gifted Child Today, 1, 2-10. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Foster, J. (1971). Creativity and the teacher. London: Macmillan. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gardner, H. (1983). Frams of Minds: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Starinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gardner, H. (1996). The creators’ patterns. In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of Creativity (pp.143-158). MIT Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gelman, R., & Brenneman, L. (1994). First principles can support both universal and culture-specific learning about number and music. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture(pp.369-390). NY: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398-1405. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Heausler, N. L. (1988). Structure of the Torrance tests of creative thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 463-468. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450-464. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. J. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In. Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (Eds) Handbook of creativity (pp. 53-59). New York : Plenum Press | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Holland, J. L. (1961). Creative and academic performance among talented adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 136-147. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Holland, J. L. (1962). The prediction of the academic, artistic, scientific, and social achievement of undergraduates of superior scholastic aptitude. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 132-143. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Holland, J. L. (1964). Prediction of academic and extracurricular achievement in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 55-65. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Holland, J. L., & Nichols, R. (1964). Prediction of academic and extracurricular achievement in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 55-65. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Holmes, D. A. (1976). A questionnaire measure of the creative personality. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 183. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Howe, R. P. (1992). Uncovering the creative dimensions of computer-graphic design products. Creative Research Journal, 5, 233-243. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Isaksen, S. G. (1987). Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jackson, P. W., & Messick, S. (1967). The person, the product, and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. In J. Kagan (Ed.), Creativity and learning (pp. 1-19). Boston: Beacon Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (2005). Introduction: How people think, work, and act creatively in diverse domains, In J. C., Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity Across Domain(pp. 1-5). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ludwig, A. (1992). The creative achievement scale. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 109-124. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ludwig, A. (1995). The price of greatness: Resolving the creativity and madness controversy. NY: Guildford. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484-495. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). In search of human effectiveness: Identifying and developing creativity. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Michael, W. B., & W | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | O’Quin, K., & Besemer, S. P. (1989). The development, reliability of the revised creative product semantic scale. Creative Research Journal, 2, 268-279. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Page, A. C., & Rosenbaum, H. F. (1987). Redesigning product lines with conjoint analysis: How Sunbeam does it. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, 120-137. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pearlman, C. (1983). A theoretical model for creativity. Education, 103, 294-305. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Plucker, J. A. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 45-53. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Plucker, J. A. (2005). The relatively generalist view of creativity. In J. C., Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity Across Domain(pp. 307-312). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Reid, J., King, F., & Wickwire, P. (1959). Cognitive and other personality characteristics of creative children. Psychological Reports, 5, 729-737. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Richards, R., Kinney, D. K., Benet, M., & Merzel, P. C. (1988). Assessing everyday creativity: Characteristics of the lifetime creative scales and validation with three large samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 476-485. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Runco, M. A. (1987). Interrater agreement on a socially valid measure of students’ creativity. Psychological Reports, 61, 1009-1010. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Runco, M. A. (1993). Cognitive and psychometric issues in creativity research. In S. G. Isaksen, M. C. Murdock, R. L. Firestien, & D. J. Treffinger (Eds.), Understanding and recognizing creativity: The emergence of a discipline (pp. 331-368). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Russ, S. (1993). Affect and creativity: The role of affect and play in the creative process. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Saunders, D., & Thagard, P. (2005). Creativity in computer science. In J. C., Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity Across Domain(pp. 153-168). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shallcross, D. J., & Gawienowski, A. M. (1989). Top experts address issues on creativity gap in higher education. Journal of Creative Behavior, 23, 75-84. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Simonton, D. K. (1975). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1119-1132. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Simonton, D. K. (1980). Thematic fame, melodic originality, and musical zeitgeist: A biographical and transhistorical content analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 972-983. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Simonton, D. K. (1991). Latent-Variable models of posthumous reputation: A quest for Galton`s G. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 607-619. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stein, M. (1987). Creativity at the crossroad. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 417-427). Buffalo, NY: Bearly. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd:Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York:Free Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sternberg, R. J., & Lubert, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of creativity (pp. 1-15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Taylor, I. A., Sutton, D., & Haworth, S. (1974). The measurement of creative transactualization: A scale to measure behavioral dispositions to creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 8, 114-115. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | The Times Higher Education Supplement (n. d.). World ranking 2006: Top 200 universities table. Retrieved September 17, 2007, from http://www.thes.co.uk/worldrankings/ | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Torrance, E. P. (1972). Career patterns and peak creative achievements of creative high school students twelve years later. Gifted Child Quarterly, 16, 75-88. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Lexington, MA: Ginn.. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York : Cambridge. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yamamoto, K. (1963) . Relationships between creative thinking abilities of teachers and achievement of pupils. Journal of Experimental Education, 32, 3-25. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yamamoto, K. (1964). Evaluation of some creativity measures in a high school with peer nominations as criteria. Journal of Psychology, 58, 285-293. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Vernon, P. E. (1989). The nature-nuture problem in creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning & C. R. Reynolds. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity. New York: Plenum. | zh_TW |