1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 國際事務學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 國際關係理論中的多邊主義：以歐盟共同外交暨安全政策為例
Multilateralism in International Relations Theory—EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy as an Example
作者 吳慧真
Wu, Hui Chen
貢獻者 甘逸驊
吳慧真
Wu, Hui Chen
關鍵詞 多邊主義
制度形式
歐盟
共同外交暨安全政策
日期 2005
上傳時間 17-九月-2009 17:53:32 (UTC+8)
摘要 在現今的國際社會中，多邊主義儼然已經成為大多數國際建制的運作模式。然而我們必須瞭解的是，多邊主義作為一種國家間關係運作的模式，它所代表的意義不只是許多國家聚集在一起，更蘊含著參與國必須遵行共同的遊戲規則、並且各自有著自視為成員的向心力等重要的意涵。因為其運作存在著這些特性，全球性的多邊主義機制大大裨益國際秩序的建立。儘管這個重要的概念直至九O年代才被真正突顯出來，但從過去國際關係的發展經驗來看，多邊主義早已運作良久，而其強調的概念也可詳見於各種國際關係理論之中，因此，此概念的提出，重要性可見一斑。
本研究先從歷史脈絡找出多邊主義的相關概念，再以魯傑的多邊主義概念出發，做一理論性的概念分析。而為進一步瞭解多邊主義機制及其內含概念的成形，本研究以歐盟的共同外交暨安全政策作為實例，從其演進的過程中循線找出多邊主義各個概念的蹤跡。從一開始的歐洲政治合作演變成共同外交暨安全政策，歐盟試圖建構出高階政治領域中歐盟國家所應遵行之普遍行為準則，其後又因為共同安全暨防禦政策以及《歐洲安全戰略》的出現，使得歐盟國家逐漸體認到歐盟在國際社會上所應該扮演的角色，因而找出自己的認同，進而強化機制的向心力量。顯然，歐盟的共同外交暨安全政策正在朝著成為一個多邊主義機制的方向邁進，如此進化的動態過程可進一步幫助我們理解多邊主義機制的形成與演化，進而使我們更加瞭解多邊主義的概念。
Multilateralism is a kind of institutional form and now exists in most international institutions. However, for this term “multilateralism” not only the gathering of many states, but also the common rules all the participants need to follow and the centripetal force from the member states who think they are bound together have to be understood. With these characteristics multilateral institutions are really contributive to the forming of international rules. Though this important concept was not much discussed until the 1990s, we could see it from the working of many international regimes for a long term. Besides, the concepts it stresses were also scattered in all sorts of international theories. Therefore, it must be understood that multilateralism is now one of the most important constitutional concepts for international regimes and from this point of view there should be more understanding in its meaning and its internal workings.
The main theoretical discussion of this research starts with John Ruggie’s perspective and some more exploration was made from this viewpoint. To know more deeply the formation of multilateralism and its interior concepts, EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) was taken as an example to see the evolutional process of a multilateral institution and to find how those above-mentioned concepts emerge in such an institution. From the European Political Cooperation (EPC) to CFSP, European states tried to build up some common rules for high politics. The European Security and Defense Policy and the European Security Strategy then helped them to realize the role European Union should play in the world, to find their identity, to strengthen the centripetal force of this institution. Apparently, this institution is tending to become a multilateral institution. This active development aids the understanding of the formation and evolution of a multilateral institution and the concepts of multilateralism as well.
參考文獻 （一） 中文部分
1、 專書
王皓昱。《歐洲合眾國：歐洲政治統合理想之實踐》。台北市：揚智文化，民86年。
丘宏達。《現代國際法》。北市：三民書局，民84年。
朱景鵬。《國際組織管理：全球化與區域化之觀點》。台北市：聯經，民93年。
沈玄池、洪德欽主編。《歐洲聯盟：理論與政策》。台北市：中研院歐美所，民87年。
周煦。《聯合國與國際政治》。台北市 : 黎明文化出版，民82年。
林碧炤。《國際政治與外交政策》。台北市：五南，民86年。
約翰‧魯傑主編，蘇長和等譯。《多邊主義》。浙江：浙江人民出版社，2003年。
倪世雄。《當代國際關係理論》。台北市：五南，民92年。
高德源譯，Jack Donnelly著。《現實主義與國際關係》。台北市：弘志，民91年。
張亞中。《歐洲整合：政府間主義與超國家主義的互動》。台北市：揚智文化，民87年。
張亞中主編。《國際關係總論》。台北市：揚智文化，民92年。
陳勁。《歐洲聯盟之整合與體制運作》。台北市：五南，民88年。
黃琛瑜。《歐洲聯盟：跨世紀政治工程》。台北市：五南，民88年。
顏子魁。《國際金融及貿易體系新發展》。台北市：國立編譯館，民88年。
2、 學術期刊
任東來，1999年，〈國際關係研究中的國際體制理論〉，《歐洲》，1999年2期，頁26-34。
衣冠城，〈歐洲政治整合的發展與未來〉http://wwwdata.fy.edu.tw/COOPERA/%E6%A0%A1%E5%85%A7%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB%E6%88%90%E6%9E%9C%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A%E4%B8%8A%E7%B6%B2/PDF/91學年度校內計畫結案/人文教育中心/91-032衣冠城/歐洲政治整合的發展與未來--衣冠城.pdf
何杰，2005年5月，〈歐盟共同外交與安全政策的制度分析〉，《國際論壇》，7卷3期，頁38-42。
吳朝旺，2004年，〈歐盟共同外交與安全政策研究〉，《復興崗學報》，80期，頁195-222。
吳萬寶，2004年，〈歐盟歐洲安全戰略研究〉，《研究與動態》，第10期，頁103-117。
李萬才，2000年，〈淺論國家主權和國際法的關係〉，《世界經濟與政治》，2000年第1期，頁62-65。
門洪華，2001年，〈集體安全辨析〉，《歐洲》，2001年5期，頁10-17。
倪峰，2004年，〈對多邊主義理論構成的一些探索〉，《國際論壇》，6卷6期，頁11-16。
秦亞青，2001年，〈多邊主義研究：理論與方法〉，《世界經濟與政治》，2001第10期，頁9-13。
章一平，2005年，〈從均勢制衡的難題看多邊主義的興起〉，《世界經濟與政治》，2005第4期，頁42-47。
舒建中，2005年，〈魯杰「多邊主義」理論述評〉，《國際論壇》，7卷1期，頁53-57。
詹中原，2006年，〈全球治理下國家公共政策的影響指標：理性選擇制度論的觀點〉。http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/CL/095/CL-R-095-019.htm
劉珍玉，2004年7月，〈歐盟共同外交與安全政策緣何難以實現？〉，《新鄉師範高等專科學校學報》，18卷4期，頁19-21。
蔡拓，2000年，〈全球主義與國家主義〉，《中國社會科學》，2000年第3 期，頁16-27。
錢文榮，2001年，〈關於多邊主義、多邊外交的幾點理論和政策思考〉，《世界經濟與政治》，10期，頁14-19。
3、 碩博士論文
劉怡伶，〈歐盟共同外交暨安全政策體制改革之研究〉，碩士論文，南華大學歐洲研究所，民國92年。
4、 研討會論文
陳欣之，〈歐洲協調：一個國際安全合作制度的孕育、持續與改變〉，中國政治學會年會暨研討會，2004年。
（二） 西文部分
1、 專書
Baldwin, David A. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
Bauer, Max, Peter Brügel, Traute Petersen, Hartwig Riedel & Manfred Wissel. Europa im 21. Jahrhundert. Bamberg: C. C. Buchners Verlag, 2003.
Brenner, Michael. Multilateralism and Western Strategy. New York: St. Martin`s Press; Houndmills, England : Macmillan, 1995.
Carlsnaes, Walter, Sjursen Helene, & Brian White (ed.). Contemporary European Foreign Policy. London; Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE, 2004.
Donnelly, Jack. Realism and International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Haas, Ernst, B. Beyond the nation-state: functionalism and international organization. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1964.
Holland, Martin (ed.). Common Foreign and Security: The Record and Reforms. London: Printer, 1997.
Keohane, Robert O. & Joseph Nye. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown, 1977.
Keohane, Robert O. (ed.). International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1989.
Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.). International Regimes Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1983.
Maghroori, Ray & Ramberg Bennet. Globalism versus Realism: International Relations’ Third Debate (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press), 1982.
Murphy, Sean D. Humanitarian Intervention: The United Nations in an Evolving World Order. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996.
Nuttall, Simon J. European Foreign Policy. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Oye, Kenneth A. Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.
Pijpers, Alfred, Regelsberger, Elfriede, & Wolfgang Wessels (ed.). European Political Cooperation in the 1980’s: A Common Foreign Policy for Western Europe? Dordrecht; Boston; London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1988.
Sewell, James P. (ed.). Multilateralism in Multinational Perspective: Viewpoints from Different Languages and Literatures. Basingstoke, Hampshire [England]: Macmillan; New York: St. Martin`s, 2000.
Shaw, Yu-ming (ed.). European and Asia-Pacific Integration: Political, Security, and Economic Perspectives. Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of International Relations, c1998.
Smith, Michael E. Europe’s Foreign and Security Policy: The Institutionalization of Cooperation. Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Snyder, Glenn H. Alliance Politics. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 1997.
Stein, Arthur A. Why Nations Cooperate: Circumstance and Choice in International Relations. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1990.
Waltz, Kenneth, N. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979.
Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Whitman, Richard G. From Civilian Power to Superpower? The International Identity of the European Union. Basingstoke, Hampshire [England]: Macmillan Press; New York: St. Martin`s Press, 1998.
2、 學術期刊
Alvarez, José E., “Multilateralism and its Discontents,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 11, No. 2 (2000), pp. 393-411.
Axelrod, Robert & Robert O. Keohane, “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions,” World Politics, Vol. 38, No. 1 (1985), pp. 226-254.
Axelrod, Robert, “The Emergence of Cooperation among Egoists,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 75, NO.2 (1981), pp. 306-318.
Baumann, Rainer, “The Transformation of German Multilateralism—Changes in the Foreign Policy Discourse since Unification,” German Politics and Society, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Winter, 2002), pp. 1-26.
Becher, Klaus, “Has-Been, Wannabe, or Leader: Europe’s Role in the World after the 2003 European Security Strategy,” European Security, Vol. 13, No. 4 (2004), pp. 345-359.
Bond, Alison, “U.S. Funding of the United Nations: arrears Payments as an Indicator of Multilateralism,” Berkley Journal of International Law, Vol. 21, No. 703 (2003), pp. 703-714.
Caparaso, James A., “International Relations Theory and Multilateralism: The Search for Foundations,” International Organizations, Vol. 46, No. 4 (Summer, 1992), pp.599-632.
Checkel, Jeffrey T., “Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol.43, No. 1 (1999), pp. 83-114.
Claude, Inis L., “Multilateralism-Diplomatic and Otherwise,” International Organization, Vol. 12, No.1, 1958, pp. 43-52.
Crowe, Brian, “A Common European Foreign Policy After Iraq?” International Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 3 (2003), pp. 533-546.
Downs, George, David Rocke, and Peter Barsoom, “Managing the Evolution of Multilateralism,” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 2 (1998), pp. 397-419.
Ferreira-Pereira, Laura C., “The Militarily Non-Allied States in the CFSP of the 1990’s,” European Integration Online Papers, Vol. 7, No. 3 (2004). http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2004-003.pdf
Gallarotti, Giulio M., “The Limits of International Organization: Systematic Failure in the Management of International Relations,” International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 2 (1991), pp. 183-220.
Haas, Ernst B., “Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes,” World Politics, Vol. 32, No. 3 (1980), pp. 357-405.
Haggard, Stephan & Beth Simmons, “Theories of International Regimes,” International Organization, Vol. 41, No.3 (1987), pp. 491-517.
Haine, Jean-Yves, “Idealism and Power: The New EU Security Strategy,” Current History, Vol. 103, No. 671 (2004), pp. 107-112.
Hemmer, Christopher & Peter J. Katzenstein, “Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism,” International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 3 (Summer 2002), pp. 575-607.
Hoffmann, Stanely, “Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation State and the Case of Western Europe,” Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Vol. 95, No. 3 (1966), pp. 862-915
Kahler, Miles, “Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers,” International Organizations, Vol. 46, No. 3 (Summer, 1992), pp.681-708.
Keohane, Robert O., “International Institutions: Two Approaches,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 4 (1988), pp. 376-379.
Keohane, Robert O., “Multilateralism: An Agenda for Research,” International Journal, Vol. 45, No. 4 (Autumn, 1990), pp. 731-764.
Keohane, Robert, “Governance in a Partially Globalized World,” American Political Science Review, (2001), pp. 1-13.
Keohane, Robert O. & Lisa Martin, “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1 (1995), pp. 39-51.
Keohane, Robert O. “Governance in a Partially Globalized World,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 95, No. 1 (Mar 2000), pp. 1-14.
Keohane, Robert O. “Reciprocity in International Relations,” International Organization, Vol. 40, No. 1 (1986)
Krasner, Stephen D., “Power and Constraint,” Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2000), pp. 231-236.
Kratochwil, Friedrich, and John Gerard Ruggie, “International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State,” International Organization, Vol. 40, No. 4 (Autumn, 1986), pp. 753-775.
Krause, Joachim, “Multilateralism: Behind European Views,” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 2 (Spring, 2004), 43-59.
Krause, Joachim, “Multilateralismus in der Sicherheitspolitik—Europäische und Amerikanische Sichtweisen, ”erschienen in: Johannes Varwick (Hrsg.), NATO-EU Partnerschaft, Konkurenz, Rivalität? (Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich, 2005) S. 219-238. http://www.isuk.org/de/pdf/Multilateralismus.pdf
Kreutz, Joakim, “Reviewing the EU Arms Embargo on China: the Clash between Value and Rationale in the European Security Strategy,” Perspectives, 22 (Summer 2004), pp. 43-58.
Kupchan, Charles A. & Clifford A. Kupchan, “Concerts, Collective Security, and the Future of Europe,” International Security, Vol. 16, No. 1 (1991), pp. 114-161.
Martin, Lisa L., “Interests, Power, and Multilateralism,” International Organizations, Vol. 46, No. 4 (Autumn, 1992), pp. 765-792.
McGinnis, John O., “The Political Economy of Global Multilateralism,” Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2000), pp. 381-399.
Mearsheimer, John, “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3 (1994/95), pp. 5-49.
Menon, Anand, “Member States and International Institutions: Institutionalizing Intergovernmentalism in the European Union,” Comparative European Politics, Vol.1, Iss. 2 (2003), pp. 171-201.
Milner, Helen, “International Theories of Cooperation among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses,” World Politics, Vol. 44, No. 3 (1992), pp. 466-496.
Missiroli, Antonio, “The European Union: Just a Regional Peacekeeper?” European Foreign Affairs Review, 8 (2003), pp. 493-503.
Moravcsik, Andrew, “Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community,” International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 1 (1991), pp. 19-56.
Moravcsik, Andrew, “Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach,” Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 31, No. 4 (1993), pp. 473-524.
Natase, Dorina, “The Merge of the Common Foreign and Security Policy and WEU – a Step Ahead in Integration?” http://en.crsg.ro/Lucrari/WE_EU.pdf
Raustiala, Kal, “Sovereignty and Multilateralism,” Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Fall 2000), pp. 401-419.
Ruggie, John G., “International Responses to Technology: Concept and Trends,” International Organization, Vol. 28, No.3 (1975), pp. 557-583.
Ruggie, John G., “Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution,” International Organizations, Vol. 46, No. 3 (Summer 1992), pp. 561-598.
Ruggie, John G., “Third Try at World Order? America and Multilateralism After the Cold War,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 109, No. 4 (1994), pp.553-570.
Schuller Frank C. & Thomas D. Grant, “Executive Diplomacy: Multilateralism, Unilateralism and Managing American Power,” International Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 1 (2003)
Sjursen, Helene, “The Common Foreign and Security Policy: an Emerging New Voice in International Politics?” ARENA, 1999. http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/wp99_34.htm
Smith, Michael E., “Institutionalization, Policy Adaptation and European Foreign Policy Cooperation,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 10, No. 1 (2004), pp. 95-136.
Smith, Michael E., “The Framing of European Foreign and Security Policy: Towards a Post-Modern Policy Framework?” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 10, No. 4 (2003), pp. 556-575.
Smith, Michael E., “Toward a Theory of EU Foreign Policy-Making: Multi-level Governance, Domestic Politics, and National Adaptation to Europe’s Foreign and Security Policy,” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 11, No. 4 (2004), pp. 740-758.
Stahl, Bernhard, Boekle, Henning, Nadoll, Jörg & Jóhannesdóttir, Anna, “Understanding the Atlanticist-Europeanist Divide in the CFSP: Comparing Denmark, France, Germany and the Netherlands,” European Foreign Affairs Review, 9 (2004), pp. 417-441.
Standholtz, Wayne & John Zysman, “1992: Recasting the European Bargaining,” World Politics, Vol. 42, No. 1 (1989), pp. 95-128.
Stefanova, Boyka, “The European Union as a Security Actor: Security Provision Through Enlargement,” World Affairs, Vol. 168, No. 2 (Fall 2005), pp. 51-66.
Thym, Daniel, “Reforming Europe’s Common Foreign and Security Policy,” European Law Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1 (2004), pp. 5-22.
Van Oudenaren, John, “What Is ‘Multilateral’ ? ” Policy Review, No. 117(2003), pp. 33-47.
Wendt, Alexander, “Constructing International Politics,” International Security, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Summer 1995), 71-81.
Young, Oran R., “International Regimes: Problems of Concept Formation,” World Politics, Vol. 32, No. 3 (1980), pp. 331-356.
3、 碩博士論文
Apostolidis, Dimitrios, “Common Foreign and Security Policy: An Aspect of European Political Integration,” Dissertation, Boston University (1999).
4、 會議論文
Miles Kahler, “Global Governance Redefined,” Paper for the United Nations and International Dispute Settlement Conference, National Chenchi University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2006.
（三） 官方資料
The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington DC, September 2002.
Javier Solana, “A Security Europe in a Better World,” Thessaloniki: European Council, 2003.
（四） 相關網站
歐洲聯盟官方網站 - http://europa.eu.int/
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
外交研究所
92253006
94
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0922530061
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 甘逸驊zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 吳慧真zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Wu, Hui Chenen_US
dc.creator (作者) 吳慧真zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Wu, Hui Chenen_US
dc.date (日期) 2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-九月-2009 17:53:32 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-九月-2009 17:53:32 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-九月-2009 17:53:32 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0922530061en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33693-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 外交研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92253006zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在現今的國際社會中，多邊主義儼然已經成為大多數國際建制的運作模式。然而我們必須瞭解的是，多邊主義作為一種國家間關係運作的模式，它所代表的意義不只是許多國家聚集在一起，更蘊含著參與國必須遵行共同的遊戲規則、並且各自有著自視為成員的向心力等重要的意涵。因為其運作存在著這些特性，全球性的多邊主義機制大大裨益國際秩序的建立。儘管這個重要的概念直至九O年代才被真正突顯出來，但從過去國際關係的發展經驗來看，多邊主義早已運作良久，而其強調的概念也可詳見於各種國際關係理論之中，因此，此概念的提出，重要性可見一斑。
本研究先從歷史脈絡找出多邊主義的相關概念，再以魯傑的多邊主義概念出發，做一理論性的概念分析。而為進一步瞭解多邊主義機制及其內含概念的成形，本研究以歐盟的共同外交暨安全政策作為實例，從其演進的過程中循線找出多邊主義各個概念的蹤跡。從一開始的歐洲政治合作演變成共同外交暨安全政策，歐盟試圖建構出高階政治領域中歐盟國家所應遵行之普遍行為準則，其後又因為共同安全暨防禦政策以及《歐洲安全戰略》的出現，使得歐盟國家逐漸體認到歐盟在國際社會上所應該扮演的角色，因而找出自己的認同，進而強化機制的向心力量。顯然，歐盟的共同外交暨安全政策正在朝著成為一個多邊主義機制的方向邁進，如此進化的動態過程可進一步幫助我們理解多邊主義機制的形成與演化，進而使我們更加瞭解多邊主義的概念。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Multilateralism is a kind of institutional form and now exists in most international institutions. However, for this term “multilateralism” not only the gathering of many states, but also the common rules all the participants need to follow and the centripetal force from the member states who think they are bound together have to be understood. With these characteristics multilateral institutions are really contributive to the forming of international rules. Though this important concept was not much discussed until the 1990s, we could see it from the working of many international regimes for a long term. Besides, the concepts it stresses were also scattered in all sorts of international theories. Therefore, it must be understood that multilateralism is now one of the most important constitutional concepts for international regimes and from this point of view there should be more understanding in its meaning and its internal workings.
The main theoretical discussion of this research starts with John Ruggie’s perspective and some more exploration was made from this viewpoint. To know more deeply the formation of multilateralism and its interior concepts, EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) was taken as an example to see the evolutional process of a multilateral institution and to find how those above-mentioned concepts emerge in such an institution. From the European Political Cooperation (EPC) to CFSP, European states tried to build up some common rules for high politics. The European Security and Defense Policy and the European Security Strategy then helped them to realize the role European Union should play in the world, to find their identity, to strengthen the centripetal force of this institution. Apparently, this institution is tending to become a multilateral institution. This active development aids the understanding of the formation and evolution of a multilateral institution and the concepts of multilateralism as well.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目 次 i
表目次 iii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與研究目的 …………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究方法與研究架構 …………………………………………… 4
第三節 研究範圍與研究限制 …………………………………………… 5
第四節 文獻探討 ………………………………………………………… 7
第五節 小結 ……………………………………………………………… 16
第二章 多邊主義的背景 18
第一節 多邊主義的成形 ……………………………………………… 18
第二節 相關理論的多邊主義概念 …………………………………… 23
第三節 多邊主義的批評 ……………………………………………… 30
第四節 小結 …………………………………………………………… 34
第三章 多邊主義之理論性論述 37
第一節 多邊主義：一種制度架構之下的互動模式 …………………… 37
第二節 多邊主義與國家 ………………………………………………… 45
第三節 多邊主義與國際秩序 …………………………………………… 55
第四節 小結 ……………………………………………………………… 62
第四章 歐盟共同外交暨安全政策 64
第一節 共同外交暨安全政策的前身 …………………………………… 64
第二節 共同外交暨安全政策的演進 …………………………………… 71
第三節 邁向多邊主義機制—歐洲安全戰略的出現 …………………… 79
第四節 共同外交暨安全政策的特色—多邊主義？ …………………… 85
第五節 小結 ……………………………………………………………… 92
第五章 結論 95
第一節 研究成果 …………………………………………………… …… 95
第二節 研究發現 ………………………………………………………… 98
第三節 總結 ……………………………………………………………… 103
參考書目 106		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 55483 bytes-
dc.format.extent 80863 bytes-
dc.format.extent 64859 bytes-
dc.format.extent 219795 bytes-
dc.format.extent 287500 bytes-
dc.format.extent 288977 bytes-
dc.format.extent 307255 bytes-
dc.format.extent 184084 bytes-
dc.format.extent 156653 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0922530061en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 多邊主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 制度形式zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 歐盟zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 共同外交暨安全政策zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 國際關係理論中的多邊主義：以歐盟共同外交暨安全政策為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Multilateralism in International Relations Theory—EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy as an Exampleen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) （一） 中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1、 專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王皓昱。《歐洲合眾國：歐洲政治統合理想之實踐》。台北市：揚智文化，民86年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 丘宏達。《現代國際法》。北市：三民書局，民84年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 朱景鵬。《國際組織管理：全球化與區域化之觀點》。台北市：聯經，民93年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 沈玄池、洪德欽主編。《歐洲聯盟：理論與政策》。台北市：中研院歐美所，民87年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周煦。《聯合國與國際政治》。台北市 : 黎明文化出版，民82年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林碧炤。《國際政治與外交政策》。台北市：五南，民86年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 約翰‧魯傑主編，蘇長和等譯。《多邊主義》。浙江：浙江人民出版社，2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 倪世雄。《當代國際關係理論》。台北市：五南，民92年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高德源譯，Jack Donnelly著。《現實主義與國際關係》。台北市：弘志，民91年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張亞中。《歐洲整合：政府間主義與超國家主義的互動》。台北市：揚智文化，民87年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張亞中主編。《國際關係總論》。台北市：揚智文化，民92年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳勁。《歐洲聯盟之整合與體制運作》。台北市：五南，民88年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃琛瑜。《歐洲聯盟：跨世紀政治工程》。台北市：五南，民88年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顏子魁。《國際金融及貿易體系新發展》。台北市：國立編譯館，民88年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2、 學術期刊zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 任東來，1999年，〈國際關係研究中的國際體制理論〉，《歐洲》，1999年2期，頁26-34。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 衣冠城，〈歐洲政治整合的發展與未來〉http://wwwdata.fy.edu.tw/COOPERA/%E6%A0%A1%E5%85%A7%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB%E6%88%90%E6%9E%9C%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A%E4%B8%8A%E7%B6%B2/PDF/91學年度校內計畫結案/人文教育中心/91-032衣冠城/歐洲政治整合的發展與未來--衣冠城.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 何杰，2005年5月，〈歐盟共同外交與安全政策的制度分析〉，《國際論壇》，7卷3期，頁38-42。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳朝旺，2004年，〈歐盟共同外交與安全政策研究〉，《復興崗學報》，80期，頁195-222。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳萬寶，2004年，〈歐盟歐洲安全戰略研究〉，《研究與動態》，第10期，頁103-117。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李萬才，2000年，〈淺論國家主權和國際法的關係〉，《世界經濟與政治》，2000年第1期，頁62-65。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 門洪華，2001年，〈集體安全辨析〉，《歐洲》，2001年5期，頁10-17。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 倪峰，2004年，〈對多邊主義理論構成的一些探索〉，《國際論壇》，6卷6期，頁11-16。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 秦亞青，2001年，〈多邊主義研究：理論與方法〉，《世界經濟與政治》，2001第10期，頁9-13。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 章一平，2005年，〈從均勢制衡的難題看多邊主義的興起〉，《世界經濟與政治》，2005第4期，頁42-47。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 舒建中，2005年，〈魯杰「多邊主義」理論述評〉，《國際論壇》，7卷1期，頁53-57。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 詹中原，2006年，〈全球治理下國家公共政策的影響指標：理性選擇制度論的觀點〉。http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/CL/095/CL-R-095-019.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉珍玉，2004年7月，〈歐盟共同外交與安全政策緣何難以實現？〉，《新鄉師範高等專科學校學報》，18卷4期，頁19-21。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡拓，2000年，〈全球主義與國家主義〉，《中國社會科學》，2000年第3 期，頁16-27。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 錢文榮，2001年，〈關於多邊主義、多邊外交的幾點理論和政策思考〉，《世界經濟與政治》，10期，頁14-19。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3、 碩博士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉怡伶，〈歐盟共同外交暨安全政策體制改革之研究〉，碩士論文，南華大學歐洲研究所，民國92年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4、 研討會論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳欣之，〈歐洲協調：一個國際安全合作制度的孕育、持續與改變〉，中國政治學會年會暨研討會，2004年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) （二） 西文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1、 專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baldwin, David A. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bauer, Max, Peter Brügel, Traute Petersen, Hartwig Riedel & Manfred Wissel. Europa im 21. Jahrhundert. Bamberg: C. C. Buchners Verlag, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brenner, Michael. Multilateralism and Western Strategy. New York: St. Martin`s Press; Houndmills, England : Macmillan, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carlsnaes, Walter, Sjursen Helene, & Brian White (ed.). Contemporary European Foreign Policy. London; Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Donnelly, Jack. Realism and International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haas, Ernst, B. Beyond the nation-state: functionalism and international organization. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1964.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Holland, Martin (ed.). Common Foreign and Security: The Record and Reforms. London: Printer, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keohane, Robert O. & Joseph Nye. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown, 1977.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keohane, Robert O. (ed.). International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.). International Regimes Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Maghroori, Ray & Ramberg Bennet. Globalism versus Realism: International Relations’ Third Debate (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press), 1982.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Murphy, Sean D. Humanitarian Intervention: The United Nations in an Evolving World Order. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nuttall, Simon J. European Foreign Policy. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oye, Kenneth A. Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pijpers, Alfred, Regelsberger, Elfriede, & Wolfgang Wessels (ed.). European Political Cooperation in the 1980’s: A Common Foreign Policy for Western Europe? Dordrecht; Boston; London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1988.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sewell, James P. (ed.). Multilateralism in Multinational Perspective: Viewpoints from Different Languages and Literatures. Basingstoke, Hampshire [England]: Macmillan; New York: St. Martin`s, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shaw, Yu-ming (ed.). European and Asia-Pacific Integration: Political, Security, and Economic Perspectives. Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of International Relations, c1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, Michael E. Europe’s Foreign and Security Policy: The Institutionalization of Cooperation. Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Snyder, Glenn H. Alliance Politics. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stein, Arthur A. Why Nations Cooperate: Circumstance and Choice in International Relations. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Waltz, Kenneth, N. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Whitman, Richard G. From Civilian Power to Superpower? The International Identity of the European Union. Basingstoke, Hampshire [England]: Macmillan Press; New York: St. Martin`s Press, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2、 學術期刊zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alvarez, José E., “Multilateralism and its Discontents,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 11, No. 2 (2000), pp. 393-411.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Axelrod, Robert & Robert O. Keohane, “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions,” World Politics, Vol. 38, No. 1 (1985), pp. 226-254.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Axelrod, Robert, “The Emergence of Cooperation among Egoists,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 75, NO.2 (1981), pp. 306-318.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baumann, Rainer, “The Transformation of German Multilateralism—Changes in the Foreign Policy Discourse since Unification,” German Politics and Society, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Winter, 2002), pp. 1-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Becher, Klaus, “Has-Been, Wannabe, or Leader: Europe’s Role in the World after the 2003 European Security Strategy,” European Security, Vol. 13, No. 4 (2004), pp. 345-359.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bond, Alison, “U.S. Funding of the United Nations: arrears Payments as an Indicator of Multilateralism,” Berkley Journal of International Law, Vol. 21, No. 703 (2003), pp. 703-714.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Caparaso, James A., “International Relations Theory and Multilateralism: The Search for Foundations,” International Organizations, Vol. 46, No. 4 (Summer, 1992), pp.599-632.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Checkel, Jeffrey T., “Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol.43, No. 1 (1999), pp. 83-114.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Claude, Inis L., “Multilateralism-Diplomatic and Otherwise,” International Organization, Vol. 12, No.1, 1958, pp. 43-52.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Crowe, Brian, “A Common European Foreign Policy After Iraq?” International Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 3 (2003), pp. 533-546.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Downs, George, David Rocke, and Peter Barsoom, “Managing the Evolution of Multilateralism,” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 2 (1998), pp. 397-419.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ferreira-Pereira, Laura C., “The Militarily Non-Allied States in the CFSP of the 1990’s,” European Integration Online Papers, Vol. 7, No. 3 (2004). http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2004-003.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gallarotti, Giulio M., “The Limits of International Organization: Systematic Failure in the Management of International Relations,” International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 2 (1991), pp. 183-220.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haas, Ernst B., “Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes,” World Politics, Vol. 32, No. 3 (1980), pp. 357-405.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haggard, Stephan & Beth Simmons, “Theories of International Regimes,” International Organization, Vol. 41, No.3 (1987), pp. 491-517.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haine, Jean-Yves, “Idealism and Power: The New EU Security Strategy,” Current History, Vol. 103, No. 671 (2004), pp. 107-112.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hemmer, Christopher & Peter J. Katzenstein, “Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism,” International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 3 (Summer 2002), pp. 575-607.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hoffmann, Stanely, “Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation State and the Case of Western Europe,” Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Vol. 95, No. 3 (1966), pp. 862-915zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kahler, Miles, “Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers,” International Organizations, Vol. 46, No. 3 (Summer, 1992), pp.681-708.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keohane, Robert O., “International Institutions: Two Approaches,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 4 (1988), pp. 376-379.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keohane, Robert O., “Multilateralism: An Agenda for Research,” International Journal, Vol. 45, No. 4 (Autumn, 1990), pp. 731-764.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keohane, Robert, “Governance in a Partially Globalized World,” American Political Science Review, (2001), pp. 1-13.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keohane, Robert O. & Lisa Martin, “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1 (1995), pp. 39-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keohane, Robert O. “Governance in a Partially Globalized World,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 95, No. 1 (Mar 2000), pp. 1-14.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keohane, Robert O. “Reciprocity in International Relations,” International Organization, Vol. 40, No. 1 (1986)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krasner, Stephen D., “Power and Constraint,” Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2000), pp. 231-236.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kratochwil, Friedrich, and John Gerard Ruggie, “International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State,” International Organization, Vol. 40, No. 4 (Autumn, 1986), pp. 753-775.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krause, Joachim, “Multilateralism: Behind European Views,” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 2 (Spring, 2004), 43-59.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krause, Joachim, “Multilateralismus in der Sicherheitspolitik—Europäische und Amerikanische Sichtweisen, ”erschienen in: Johannes Varwick (Hrsg.), NATO-EU Partnerschaft, Konkurenz, Rivalität? (Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich, 2005) S. 219-238. http://www.isuk.org/de/pdf/Multilateralismus.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kreutz, Joakim, “Reviewing the EU Arms Embargo on China: the Clash between Value and Rationale in the European Security Strategy,” Perspectives, 22 (Summer 2004), pp. 43-58.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kupchan, Charles A. & Clifford A. Kupchan, “Concerts, Collective Security, and the Future of Europe,” International Security, Vol. 16, No. 1 (1991), pp. 114-161.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Martin, Lisa L., “Interests, Power, and Multilateralism,” International Organizations, Vol. 46, No. 4 (Autumn, 1992), pp. 765-792.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McGinnis, John O., “The Political Economy of Global Multilateralism,” Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2000), pp. 381-399.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mearsheimer, John, “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3 (1994/95), pp. 5-49.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Menon, Anand, “Member States and International Institutions: Institutionalizing Intergovernmentalism in the European Union,” Comparative European Politics, Vol.1, Iss. 2 (2003), pp. 171-201.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Milner, Helen, “International Theories of Cooperation among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses,” World Politics, Vol. 44, No. 3 (1992), pp. 466-496.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Missiroli, Antonio, “The European Union: Just a Regional Peacekeeper?” European Foreign Affairs Review, 8 (2003), pp. 493-503.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Moravcsik, Andrew, “Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community,” International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 1 (1991), pp. 19-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Moravcsik, Andrew, “Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach,” Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 31, No. 4 (1993), pp. 473-524.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Natase, Dorina, “The Merge of the Common Foreign and Security Policy and WEU – a Step Ahead in Integration?” http://en.crsg.ro/Lucrari/WE_EU.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Raustiala, Kal, “Sovereignty and Multilateralism,” Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Fall 2000), pp. 401-419.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ruggie, John G., “International Responses to Technology: Concept and Trends,” International Organization, Vol. 28, No.3 (1975), pp. 557-583.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ruggie, John G., “Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution,” International Organizations, Vol. 46, No. 3 (Summer 1992), pp. 561-598.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ruggie, John G., “Third Try at World Order? America and Multilateralism After the Cold War,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 109, No. 4 (1994), pp.553-570.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schuller Frank C. & Thomas D. Grant, “Executive Diplomacy: Multilateralism, Unilateralism and Managing American Power,” International Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 1 (2003)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sjursen, Helene, “The Common Foreign and Security Policy: an Emerging New Voice in International Politics?” ARENA, 1999. http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/wp99_34.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, Michael E., “Institutionalization, Policy Adaptation and European Foreign Policy Cooperation,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 10, No. 1 (2004), pp. 95-136.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, Michael E., “The Framing of European Foreign and Security Policy: Towards a Post-Modern Policy Framework?” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 10, No. 4 (2003), pp. 556-575.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, Michael E., “Toward a Theory of EU Foreign Policy-Making: Multi-level Governance, Domestic Politics, and National Adaptation to Europe’s Foreign and Security Policy,” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 11, No. 4 (2004), pp. 740-758.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stahl, Bernhard, Boekle, Henning, Nadoll, Jörg & Jóhannesdóttir, Anna, “Understanding the Atlanticist-Europeanist Divide in the CFSP: Comparing Denmark, France, Germany and the Netherlands,” European Foreign Affairs Review, 9 (2004), pp. 417-441.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Standholtz, Wayne & John Zysman, “1992: Recasting the European Bargaining,” World Politics, Vol. 42, No. 1 (1989), pp. 95-128.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stefanova, Boyka, “The European Union as a Security Actor: Security Provision Through Enlargement,” World Affairs, Vol. 168, No. 2 (Fall 2005), pp. 51-66.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thym, Daniel, “Reforming Europe’s Common Foreign and Security Policy,” European Law Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1 (2004), pp. 5-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Van Oudenaren, John, “What Is ‘Multilateral’ ? ” Policy Review, No. 117(2003), pp. 33-47.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wendt, Alexander, “Constructing International Politics,” International Security, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Summer 1995), 71-81.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Young, Oran R., “International Regimes: Problems of Concept Formation,” World Politics, Vol. 32, No. 3 (1980), pp. 331-356.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3、 碩博士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Apostolidis, Dimitrios, “Common Foreign and Security Policy: An Aspect of European Political Integration,” Dissertation, Boston University (1999).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4、 會議論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Miles Kahler, “Global Governance Redefined,” Paper for the United Nations and International Dispute Settlement Conference, National Chenchi University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2006.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) （三） 官方資料zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington DC, September 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Javier Solana, “A Security Europe in a Better World,” Thessaloniki: European Council, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) （四） 相關網站zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 歐洲聯盟官方網站 - http://europa.eu.int/zh_TW