學術產出-學位論文

題名 承銷方式.投資者意見差異與上市績效
IPO method,divergence of opinions and the performance
作者 吳筱婷
貢獻者 姜堯民
吳筱婷
關鍵詞 承銷方式
投資者意見差異
初次公開發行
公開申購
競價拍賣
日期 2006
上傳時間 17-九月-2009 19:21:06 (UTC+8)
摘要 本篇論文係以台灣新上市股票作為研究對象,欲檢驗「投資者意見差異變數」
對於股票長短期績效之解釋能力,使用相似之「投資者意見差異變數」,是否同樣可以合理解釋台灣新上市股票市場的現況,台灣的實證是否同樣支持Miller所提出的假設。並進而探討在不同承銷制度下,是否會影響「投資者意見差異變數」對於上市績效之解釋能力與影響方向。
研究使用「蜜月期天數」、「買賣價差百分比」與「新股蜜月期間周轉率」三者作為「投資者意見差異程度」之代理變數,研究結果發現:此三變數在排除公司特性、發行市場現況等控制變數的影響部分之後,其餘無法被控制變數所解釋的部分,確實對於新上市股票之長短期報酬具有解釋能力,且各意見差異變數與新股短期報酬率之間存有正向關係,而與一年至三年之長期持有報酬率間存有反向關係,此研究結論相當支持Miller假設,除此之外,研究並發現:不同新股承銷制度不會顯著地影響投資者意見差異程度,且若使用公開申購與競價拍賣兩種不同的新股配售方式,僅會影響「投資者意見差異變數」與「新股長期報酬」的影響程度與方向。
This paper focus on the Taiwan’s IPOs and tries to test the direct relationship between “ divergence of opinions ” and “ the short- run and long- run performance of the initial public offerings (IPOs). ” We use several similar variables to explain the situation of Taiwan’s stock market and find out if data can support the Miller’s hypothesis. Besides, we want to discuss the relationship between “ IPO method ” and “ divergence of opinions ”. We check that different IPO method will have influence on the explanatory power of the “ divergence of opinions”.
We use three different variables:“ the number of the honey moon date”, “ the percentage of bid-ask spread ” and “ the turnover rate during the honey moon” as the proxies of the divergence of opinions. The research result finds out that three proxies can truly provide significant explanatory power of the short-run and long-run performance of the IPOs after controlling for issue quality. The results support Miller ( 1977 ), who suggests that greater divergence of opinions or uncertainty about an IPO can generate short-run overvaluation and long-run underperformance. In other words, the divergence of opinions have positive relationship with the initial return and negative relationship with the long run holding period return of IPOs. Besides, the two IPO method ( fixed-price offerings and discriminatory auction ) will only change the long run relationship.
參考文獻 Ann E. Sherman, 2003, Global trends in IPO methods: Book building versus auctions, Working paper, University of Notre Dame.
Edward Miller, 1977, Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion, Journal of Finance, 32, 1151-1168. 67
Francois Derrien and Kent L. Womack, 2003, Auction vs. bookbuilding and the control of underpricing in hot IPO markets, Review of Financial Studies, 16, 31-61.
Jay R. Ritter and Ivo Welch, 2002, A review of IPO activity, pricing and allocation, Journal of Finance, 57, 1795-1828.
Ji-Chai Lin, Yi-Tsung Lee, and Yu-Jane Liu, 2003 ,“Why Have Auctions Been Losing Market Shares to Bookbuilding in IPO Markets?,” working paper, 1-53.
Laurie Krigman, Wayne H. Shaw and Kent L. Womack, 1999, The persistence of IPO mispricing and the predictive power of flipping, Journal of Finance, 54, 1015-1044.
Omer Pamukcu, 2003, Accruals and divergence of investors’ opinions, Journal of Finance.
Rajesh K. Aggarwal, Laurie Krigman and Kent L. Womack, 2002, Strategic IPO underpricing, information momentum, and lockup expiration selling, Journal of Financial Economics, 66, 105-137.
Todd Houge, Tim Loughran, Gerry Suchanek and Xuemin Yan, 2002, Divergence of opinion, uncertainty, and the quality of initial public offerings. Financial Management, 30, 5-23.
Thomas J. Chemmanur and Mark H. Liu, 2002, How should a firm go public? A dynamic model of the choice between fixed-price offerings and auctions in IPOs and privatizations, Working paper, Boston College.
Yu-Jane Liu and Gwohorng Liaw, 2003, On the demand elasticity of initial public offerings: An analysis of discriminatory auctions. International Review of Finance, 2, 151-178.
林象山、許清華(民86),新上市股承銷方式的選擇,中國財務學刊,第五卷第一期,19-41。
洪崇文 (民93),承銷機制的選擇-理論與實證,政治大學財務管理研究所博士論文。
夏侯欣榮(民82),台灣地區IPO 承銷價格之研究,政治大學企管研究所未出版之博士論文。
馬黛、胡德中 (民92),承銷配售機制之決定及其對IPO折價之影響:競價拍賣、詢價圈購與公開申購,財務金融學刊,第十一卷第一期,1-40。
陳軒基、葉秀娟與陳右超 (民92),承銷商與折價程度:台灣初次上市櫃股票之實證分析,證券市場發展季刊,第十四卷第四期,175-198。
劉郁純(民81),我國新上市股票承銷價格決定因素之實證研究,政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
顏吉利、林純瓊與陳秀亮 (民78),股票上市、中籤率與超額報酬,證券市場發展季刊,第一卷第一期,92-101。
魏恒祥(民86),台灣地區新上市股票承銷價格低估及其影響因素之實證研究,淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士班碩士論文。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財務管理研究所
94357024
95
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094357024
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 姜堯民zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 吳筱婷zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 吳筱婷zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-九月-2009 19:21:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-九月-2009 19:21:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-九月-2009 19:21:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0094357024en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34070-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財務管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94357024zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本篇論文係以台灣新上市股票作為研究對象,欲檢驗「投資者意見差異變數」
對於股票長短期績效之解釋能力,使用相似之「投資者意見差異變數」,是否同樣可以合理解釋台灣新上市股票市場的現況,台灣的實證是否同樣支持Miller所提出的假設。並進而探討在不同承銷制度下,是否會影響「投資者意見差異變數」對於上市績效之解釋能力與影響方向。
研究使用「蜜月期天數」、「買賣價差百分比」與「新股蜜月期間周轉率」三者作為「投資者意見差異程度」之代理變數,研究結果發現:此三變數在排除公司特性、發行市場現況等控制變數的影響部分之後,其餘無法被控制變數所解釋的部分,確實對於新上市股票之長短期報酬具有解釋能力,且各意見差異變數與新股短期報酬率之間存有正向關係,而與一年至三年之長期持有報酬率間存有反向關係,此研究結論相當支持Miller假設,除此之外,研究並發現:不同新股承銷制度不會顯著地影響投資者意見差異程度,且若使用公開申購與競價拍賣兩種不同的新股配售方式,僅會影響「投資者意見差異變數」與「新股長期報酬」的影響程度與方向。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This paper focus on the Taiwan’s IPOs and tries to test the direct relationship between “ divergence of opinions ” and “ the short- run and long- run performance of the initial public offerings (IPOs). ” We use several similar variables to explain the situation of Taiwan’s stock market and find out if data can support the Miller’s hypothesis. Besides, we want to discuss the relationship between “ IPO method ” and “ divergence of opinions ”. We check that different IPO method will have influence on the explanatory power of the “ divergence of opinions”.
We use three different variables:“ the number of the honey moon date”, “ the percentage of bid-ask spread ” and “ the turnover rate during the honey moon” as the proxies of the divergence of opinions. The research result finds out that three proxies can truly provide significant explanatory power of the short-run and long-run performance of the IPOs after controlling for issue quality. The results support Miller ( 1977 ), who suggests that greater divergence of opinions or uncertainty about an IPO can generate short-run overvaluation and long-run underperformance. In other words, the divergence of opinions have positive relationship with the initial return and negative relationship with the long run holding period return of IPOs. Besides, the two IPO method ( fixed-price offerings and discriminatory auction ) will only change the long run relationship.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 5
第一節 研究動機 5
第二節 研究目的 7
第三節 研究架構 7
第二章 台灣承銷方式介紹 10
第三章 歷史文獻回顧 15
第一節 新上市股票的承銷方式文獻回顧 15
第二節 投資者意見差異程度文獻回顧 23
第三節 研究假設 29
第四章 研究設計 33
第一節 資料來源 33
第二節 研究方法與變數定義 35
4.2.1 影響IPO績效的變數探討 43
4.2.2 影響投資者意見差異的變數探討 35
4.2.3 研究方法 38
第五章 實證結果與分析 49
第一節 各變數敘述性統計資料分析 49
第二節 公開申購與競價拍賣配售方式之差異性檢定 59
第三節 多變量迴歸分析 64
5.3.1 影響投資者意見差異之變數探討 64
5.3.2 新上市股票蜜月期超常報酬率探討 69
5.3.3 新上市股票之長期持有報酬率探討 71
第六章 研究結論 82
參考文獻 82
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 47468 bytes-
dc.format.extent 66986 bytes-
dc.format.extent 93724 bytes-
dc.format.extent 72898 bytes-
dc.format.extent 136648 bytes-
dc.format.extent 127536 bytes-
dc.format.extent 236669 bytes-
dc.format.extent 242599 bytes-
dc.format.extent 301244 bytes-
dc.format.extent 112811 bytes-
dc.format.extent 123100 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094357024en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 承銷方式zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 投資者意見差異zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 初次公開發行zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公開申購zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 競價拍賣zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 承銷方式.投資者意見差異與上市績效zh_TW
dc.title (題名) IPO method,divergence of opinions and the performanceen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ann E. Sherman, 2003, Global trends in IPO methods: Book building versus auctions, Working paper, University of Notre Dame.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Edward Miller, 1977, Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion, Journal of Finance, 32, 1151-1168. 67zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Francois Derrien and Kent L. Womack, 2003, Auction vs. bookbuilding and the control of underpricing in hot IPO markets, Review of Financial Studies, 16, 31-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jay R. Ritter and Ivo Welch, 2002, A review of IPO activity, pricing and allocation, Journal of Finance, 57, 1795-1828.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ji-Chai Lin, Yi-Tsung Lee, and Yu-Jane Liu, 2003 ,“Why Have Auctions Been Losing Market Shares to Bookbuilding in IPO Markets?,” working paper, 1-53.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Laurie Krigman, Wayne H. Shaw and Kent L. Womack, 1999, The persistence of IPO mispricing and the predictive power of flipping, Journal of Finance, 54, 1015-1044.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Omer Pamukcu, 2003, Accruals and divergence of investors’ opinions, Journal of Finance.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rajesh K. Aggarwal, Laurie Krigman and Kent L. Womack, 2002, Strategic IPO underpricing, information momentum, and lockup expiration selling, Journal of Financial Economics, 66, 105-137.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Todd Houge, Tim Loughran, Gerry Suchanek and Xuemin Yan, 2002, Divergence of opinion, uncertainty, and the quality of initial public offerings. Financial Management, 30, 5-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thomas J. Chemmanur and Mark H. Liu, 2002, How should a firm go public? A dynamic model of the choice between fixed-price offerings and auctions in IPOs and privatizations, Working paper, Boston College.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yu-Jane Liu and Gwohorng Liaw, 2003, On the demand elasticity of initial public offerings: An analysis of discriminatory auctions. International Review of Finance, 2, 151-178.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林象山、許清華(民86),新上市股承銷方式的選擇,中國財務學刊,第五卷第一期,19-41。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 洪崇文 (民93),承銷機制的選擇-理論與實證,政治大學財務管理研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 夏侯欣榮(民82),台灣地區IPO 承銷價格之研究,政治大學企管研究所未出版之博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬黛、胡德中 (民92),承銷配售機制之決定及其對IPO折價之影響:競價拍賣、詢價圈購與公開申購,財務金融學刊,第十一卷第一期,1-40。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳軒基、葉秀娟與陳右超 (民92),承銷商與折價程度:台灣初次上市櫃股票之實證分析,證券市場發展季刊,第十四卷第四期,175-198。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉郁純(民81),我國新上市股票承銷價格決定因素之實證研究,政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顏吉利、林純瓊與陳秀亮 (民78),股票上市、中籤率與超額報酬,證券市場發展季刊,第一卷第一期,92-101。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 魏恒祥(民86),台灣地區新上市股票承銷價格低估及其影響因素之實證研究,淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士班碩士論文。zh_TW