學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 管理當局短視行為與機構投資人持股比例關係:企業研發支出之實證研究
作者 林鼎堯
貢獻者 李怡宗
林鼎堯
關鍵詞 管理當局短視
機構投資人持股比例
盈餘管理
公司治理
management myopic
ownership of institutional investor
earning management
corporation governance
日期 2002
上傳時間 2009-09-18
摘要 現今,世界經濟脈動迅速,科技發展日新月異,如何在瞬息萬變的趨勢洪流中掠取先機,端賴自身競爭力強弱而定。然而管理當局短視行為的發生,卻易損及企業的競爭優勢,甚至對企業未來有不利影響。造成管理當局短視之因源於多方面,來自資本市場投資人的影響即為其一。而資本市場中,機構投資人往往是大家注目的焦點,因此本研究乃對機構投資人持股比例與管理當局短視行為的關係進行探討,並期望能對公司治理制度的擬定上有所助益。
本研究以民國八十四年至民國九十年為研究期間,針對我國上市公司研究其管理當局短視行為與機構投資人持股比例間的關係,並探究在電子與非電子產業間兩者關係是否相同。此外,本研究亦比較機構投資人與個人投資者,各自持股比例與管理當局短視行為的相關情形,進以探尋真正能發揮監理機制的投資人類別。
實證結果顯示:(1)管理當局短視行為與機構投資人持股比例高低有顯著之負向關係,而與個人投資者持股比例間則有顯著的正向關係。(2)在非電子產業中,機構投資人持股與管理當局短視行為呈顯著負向關係,而電子產業中兩者則無顯著關係。(3)管理當局短視行為與機構投資人持股比例變動的幅度有顯著之負向關係,而與個人投資者持股比例變動則有顯著的正向關係。(4)在非電子股產業方面,機構投資人持股比例變動幅度與管理短視行為間無顯著關係;但在電子產業中,則兩者間呈現顯著之負向關係。
Nowadays, the economy situation is changing so fast and the development of new technology has altered with each passing day. To be ahead of their competitors, firms must sharpen their competitive edge. However, management myopia often damage their competitive advantages and would do harm to the firms in the future. The phenomenon of management myopia is derived from many reason, one of them is the effect of the investors in the capital market. Furthermore, participants in the capital market always pay attention to the behavior of institution investors. Thus, this research explores the relationships between the ownership of institution investors and management myopic. We hope it would be beneficial to the enactment of the system of corporate governance.

This research focuses on the relationship between the myopic behavior of management and the ownership of institution investors of the listed companies in Taiwan Stock Exchange from 1995 to 2001. It also explores if the relationship is the same in both electronic industry and non-electronic industries. Besides, the study also compares the effect of the ownership of individual or institution investors on the management myopia in order to point out the type of investors that can provide monitory function clearly.

The empirical study indicates that (1) there is a significant negative relationship between the myopic behavior of management and the ownership of institution investors. Conversely, there is a significant positive relationship between the myopic behavior of management and the ownership of individual investors. (2) In the electronic industry, the relationship between the ownership of institution investors and the myopic behavior of management is not significant. However, it is significant negative in other industries. (3) The change of percentage of ownership of institution investors has significant negative relationship with the management myopia. However, it is opposite to the individual investors. (4) No significant relationship between the institution investors and the management myopic in non-electronic industries. But in the electronic industry, it is significant negative.
參考文獻 中文部分
王金凱,1987,我國製造業廠商研究發展決定因素之研究,國立台灣大學經濟研究所未出版碩士論文。
朱建州,1999,機構投資人與月營收資訊內涵之關聯性研究-以台灣股市為例,國立中正大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
金成隆、林修葳、張永芳,2000,強制性財務預測誤差與盈餘管理關係:20%門檻限制影響之研究,中國財務學刊,第7卷第1期:59-96。
林威伸,1997,企業研究發展與專利權間之遞延效應,私立東吳大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
馬維揚,1988,民間研究發展之促進,私立東吳大學經濟學研究所未出版之論文。
許周全,2000,機構投資人與管理當局自願性盈餘預測之關聯性研究,國立台北大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
陳忠榮,1995,技術引進與研究發展:台灣高科技廠商之實證分析,國科會補助研究計畫。
徐君毅,2001,研發與廣告支出與企業價值變動之因果關係研究,私立東海大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃明潔,2002,多期損益平穩化行為之決定因素,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版之論文。
黃雅苓,1998,研究發展支出與經營績效關係及其費用化之探討─以台灣上市公司電子與非電子業為例,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版論文。
梁玲菁,1988,我國資訊電子業研究與發展決定因素之研究,國立中興大學經濟研究所未出版碩士論文。
湯珮妤,2000,企業類型與研發支出、專利權成效之遞延效果研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
溫順德,2002,企業研究發展支出租稅減免問題及其影響之研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
董秋梅,1999,機構投資人對企業R&D活動之影響,國立交通大學經營管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
鄭嘉珮、劉錦添,1992,台灣廠商研究發展支出的分析,台灣銀行季刊,第45卷第2期:139-152。
英文部分
Albrecht, J.A. 1999. Policy instruments and incentives for environmental R&D: A market-driven approach. Working paper, University of Ghent-Ceen.
Baber, W., P. Fairfield, and J. Haggard. 1991. The effect of concern about reported income on discretionary spending decisions: The case of research and development. The Accounting Review 66: 818-829.
, S. Janakiraman, and S. Kang. 1996. Investment opportunities and the structure of executive compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21: 297-318.
Badrinath, S., G. Gay, and J. Kale. 1989. Patterns of institutional investment, prudence, and the managerial ”safety-net” hypothesis. Journal of Risk and Insurance 56 (December): 605-629.
Barth, M., J. Elliott, and M. Finn. 1997. Market rewards associated with increasing earnings patterns. Working paper, Standford University.
Bebchuk, L., and L. Stole. 1993. Do short-term objectives lead to under- or overinvestment in long-term projects? Journal of Finance 48: 719-729.
Beldona, S., A. Inkpen, and A. Phatak. 1998. Are Japanese managers more long-term oriented than United States managers? Management International Review 38 (March): 239-256.
Ben-Zion, U. 1984. The R&D and investment decision and its relationship to the firm’s market value: Some preliminary results. Patents and Productivity, edited by Z. Griliches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Berger, P. 1993. Explicit and implicit tax effects of the R&D tax credit. Journal of Accounting Research 31 (Autumn): 131-171.
Brancato,C. K. 1997. Institutional investors and corporate governance: Best Practices for increasing corporate value, Chicago, IL: Irwin. Professional Publishing.
Bronwyn, H., M. Jacques, B. Lee, and C.Bruno. 1998. Does cash flow investment and R&D? An exploration using panel data for French, Japanese, and United States scientific firms. Working paper. University of California.
Brown, K., and B. Brooke. 1993. Institutional demand and security price pressure: The case of corporate spin-offs. Financial Analysts Journal 49 (September/October): 53-62.
Burgstahler, D., and I. Dichev . 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting & Economics 24 ( December): 99-126.
Bushee, B. 1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Review 73 (July): 305-33.
. 2001. Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-term value? Contemporary Accounting Research 18 (Sumnmer): 207-46.
, and C .Noe. 1999. Disclosure quality, institutional investors, and stock return volatility. Working paper. University of Pennsylvania.
Campbell, T.S., and A. M. Marino. 1994. Myopic investment decisions and competitive labor markets. International Economic Review 35 (November): 855-75.
Cheng, S. 2002. R&D expenditures and CEO compensation. Working paper. University of Michigan.
Cohen, W., and S. Klepper. 1996. Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (2): 232-243.
DeAngelo, H., and E. Rice. 1983. Antitakeover charter amendments and stockholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 11 (April): 329-59.
DeAngelo, L. E. 1988. Managerial competition, information costs and corporation governance: The use of accounting performance measures in proxy contests. Journal of Accounting and Economics 10 (January): 3-36.
Dechow, P., and R. Sloan. 1991. Executive incentives and horizon problem : An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 14 (March): 51-89.
, , and A. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulations : An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (Spring): 1-36.
Dobrzynski, J. 1993. Relationship investing. Business Week 3309 ( March 15): 68-75.
Duke, J ., and H. Hunt. 1990. An empirical examination of debt covenant restrictions and accounting-related debt proxies. Journal of Accounting and Economics 12 (January): 45-63.
El Sawy, O. 1988. Temporal biases in strategic attention. Working paper, University of Southern California.
Eng, L., and M. Shackell. 2001. The implications of long-term performance plans and institutional ownership for firms’ research and development investments. Journal of Accounting, Auditing& Finance 16: 117-139.
Froot, K., A. Perold, and J. Stein. 1992. Shareholder trading practices and corporate investment horizons. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance: 42-58.
Fudenberg, D., and J. Tirole. 1986. A signal-jamming theory of predation. Rand Journal of Economics.ⅩⅤⅠⅠ: 366-76.
Grabowski, H.G., and N. D. Baxter. 1973. Rivalry in industrial research and development. Journal of Industrial Economics: 209-35.
, and D. C. Mueller. 1978. Industrial research and development, intangible capital stocks, and firm profit rates. Bell Journal of Economics: 328-43.
Graves, S. A., and S. Waddock. 1990. Institutional ownership and control: Implication for long-term corporate strategy. Academy of Management Executive 4 (February) : 75-83.
Graves, S. B. 1988. Institutional ownership and corporate R&D in the computer industry . Academy of Management Journal 31: 417-427.
Hand, J. 1990. A test of the extended functional fixation hypothesis. The Accounting Review 65 (October): 740-763.
. 2001. The economic versus accounting impacts of R&D on U.S. Market-to-book ratios. Working paper. University of North Carolina.
Hemmer, T. 1996. On the design and choice of “modern” management accounting measures. Journal of Management Accounting Research 8: 87-116.
Hirschey, M. 1985. Market structure and market value. Journal of Business: 89-99.
Hirshleifer, D., and T. Chordia. 1992. Managerial incentives to manipulate the timing of project resolution. Working paper. Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
Holmstrom, B. 1982. Managerial incentive problems-a dynamic perpective. In Essays in Economics and Management in Honor of Lars Wahlbeck. Helsinki: Swedish School of Economics.
Jacobs, M. 1991. Short-Term America: The Causes and Cures of Our Business Myopia. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Jalilvand, A., and R. Harris. 1984. Corporate behavior in adjusting to capital structure and dividend targets: An econometric study. Journal of Finance 39 (March) : 127-145.
Jarrell, G.A., K. Lehn, and W. Marr. 1985 . Institutional ownership, tender offers and long-term investments. Working paper. Office of the Chief Economist, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC.
, and A. Poulsen. 1987. Shark repellents and stock prices: The effects of antitakeover amendments since 1980. Journal of Financial Economics 19 (September): 127-68.
Jensen, M. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review 76: 323-29.
Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 1992. The balanced-scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review(Jan/Feb):71-79.
, .1996. The balanced-scorecard. Harvard University Press, Boston.
Kennedy, P. 1992. A Guide to Econometrics. 3d edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kim, J., I. Krinsky., and J. Lee. 1997. Institutional holdings and trading volume reactions to quarterly earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance 12 (Winter): 1-14.
Laughhunn, D., J. Payne., and R.Crum. 1980. Managerial risk preference for below-target returns. Management Science 26: 1238-1249.
Linn, S., and J. McConnell. 1983. An empirical investigation of the impact of antitakeover amendments on common stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics 11 (April): 361-99.
Loescher, S. M. 1984. Bureaucratic measurement, shutting stock share, and shortened time horizons: Implication for Economic growth. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 24 (April): 8-23.
Meulbroek, L., M. Mitchell, H. Mulherin, J. Netter, and A. Poulsen. 1990. Shark repellents and managerial myopia: An empirical test. Journal of Political Economy 98: 1108-1117.
Monks, R., and N. Minow. 1995. Corporate Governance. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Myers, S . 1984. The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance 39 (Judy): 575-592.
Nanus, B. 1975. The future-oriented corporation. Business Horizons 18 (January): 5-12.
Narayanan, M. 1985. Managerial incentives for short-term results. The Journal of Finance 5: 1469-84.
Opler, T., and J. Sokobin. 1997. Does coordinated institutional shareholder activism work? An analysis of the activities of the Council of Institutional Investors. Working paper. Ohio State University.
Perry, S., and R. Grinaker. 1994. Earnings expectations and discretionary research and development spending. Accounting Horizons 8 (December): 43-51.
Porter, M. 1992. Capital Choices: Changing the Way America Invests in Industry. Boston, MA: Council on Competitiveness/Harvard Bussiness School.
Rajgopal, S., and M. Venkatachalam. 1998. The role of institutional investors in corporate governance: An empirical investigation. Working paper. University of Washington.
Shavell, S. 1979. Risk sharing and incentives in the principal and agent relationship. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 55-73.
Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1990. Equilibrium short horizons of investors and firms. American Economic Review 80: 148-153.
Solow, R. M. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics (August): 312-20.
Stein, J. 1988. Takeover threats and managerial myopia. Journal of Political Economy 96 (February): 61-80.
. 1989. Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporate behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 (November): 655-669.
Thevaranjan, A., K. Joseph, and D. Shinivasan. 2000. Managerial myopia and non-financial measures: The case of customer satisfaction mitigating hard-selling. Working paper. Syracuse University.
Tobin, J. 1969. A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking: 15-29.
Tse, D., K. Lee, L. Vertinsky, and D. Wehrung. 1988. Does culture matter? A cross-cultural study of executives’ choice, decisiveness and risk adjustment in international marketing. Journal of Marketing 52: 81-95.
Wiedman, C. 1996. The relevance of characteristics of the information environment in the selection of a proxy for the market’s expectations for earnings: An extension of Brown, Richardson, and Schwager(1987). Journal of Accounting Research 34 (Autumn): 313-324
Yin, X., and E. Zuscovitch. 1998. Is firm size conducive to R&D choice? A strategic analysis of product and process innovations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 35: 243-262.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
90353040
91
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090353040
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 李怡宗zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 林鼎堯zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 林鼎堯zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2002en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-09-18-
dc.date.available 2009-09-18-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2009-09-18-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0090353040en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34198-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 90353040zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 現今,世界經濟脈動迅速,科技發展日新月異,如何在瞬息萬變的趨勢洪流中掠取先機,端賴自身競爭力強弱而定。然而管理當局短視行為的發生,卻易損及企業的競爭優勢,甚至對企業未來有不利影響。造成管理當局短視之因源於多方面,來自資本市場投資人的影響即為其一。而資本市場中,機構投資人往往是大家注目的焦點,因此本研究乃對機構投資人持股比例與管理當局短視行為的關係進行探討,並期望能對公司治理制度的擬定上有所助益。
本研究以民國八十四年至民國九十年為研究期間,針對我國上市公司研究其管理當局短視行為與機構投資人持股比例間的關係,並探究在電子與非電子產業間兩者關係是否相同。此外,本研究亦比較機構投資人與個人投資者,各自持股比例與管理當局短視行為的相關情形,進以探尋真正能發揮監理機制的投資人類別。
實證結果顯示:(1)管理當局短視行為與機構投資人持股比例高低有顯著之負向關係,而與個人投資者持股比例間則有顯著的正向關係。(2)在非電子產業中,機構投資人持股與管理當局短視行為呈顯著負向關係,而電子產業中兩者則無顯著關係。(3)管理當局短視行為與機構投資人持股比例變動的幅度有顯著之負向關係,而與個人投資者持股比例變動則有顯著的正向關係。(4)在非電子股產業方面,機構投資人持股比例變動幅度與管理短視行為間無顯著關係;但在電子產業中,則兩者間呈現顯著之負向關係。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Nowadays, the economy situation is changing so fast and the development of new technology has altered with each passing day. To be ahead of their competitors, firms must sharpen their competitive edge. However, management myopia often damage their competitive advantages and would do harm to the firms in the future. The phenomenon of management myopia is derived from many reason, one of them is the effect of the investors in the capital market. Furthermore, participants in the capital market always pay attention to the behavior of institution investors. Thus, this research explores the relationships between the ownership of institution investors and management myopic. We hope it would be beneficial to the enactment of the system of corporate governance.

This research focuses on the relationship between the myopic behavior of management and the ownership of institution investors of the listed companies in Taiwan Stock Exchange from 1995 to 2001. It also explores if the relationship is the same in both electronic industry and non-electronic industries. Besides, the study also compares the effect of the ownership of individual or institution investors on the management myopia in order to point out the type of investors that can provide monitory function clearly.

The empirical study indicates that (1) there is a significant negative relationship between the myopic behavior of management and the ownership of institution investors. Conversely, there is a significant positive relationship between the myopic behavior of management and the ownership of individual investors. (2) In the electronic industry, the relationship between the ownership of institution investors and the myopic behavior of management is not significant. However, it is significant negative in other industries. (3) The change of percentage of ownership of institution investors has significant negative relationship with the management myopia. However, it is opposite to the individual investors. (4) No significant relationship between the institution investors and the management myopic in non-electronic industries. But in the electronic industry, it is significant negative.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目 錄

第一章 緒 論.............................................................1
第一節 研究動機與目的.........................................1
第二節 研究問題...............................................4
第二章 文獻探討...............................................6
第一節 管理當局短視行為.......................................6
第二節 機構投資人之偏好與類別................................13
第三節 管理決策與機構投資人持股關係..........................20
第四節 影響公司研發支出決策之相關因素........................25
第三章 研究方法..............................................32
第一節 假說建立..............................................32
第二節 研究變數..............................................35
第三節 樣本資料來源與處理....................................41
第四節 分析方法..............................................42
第四章 實證結果與分析........................................45
第一節 樣本概述...............................................45
第二節 分群之敘述性統計.......................................57
第三節 機構投資人持股比例實証研究.............................67
第四節 機構投資人持股比例變動實証研究.........................73
第五章 結論與建議........................................... 81
第一節 研究結論...............................................81
第二節 研究限制...............................................83
第三節 研究建議...............................................85
參考文獻......................................................86
中文部分......................................................86
英文部分......................................................87





圖表目錄

圖3.5-1 本研究分析架構圖......................................44
表2.1-1 管理當局短視行為文獻彙總表-屬理論探討者...............11
表2.1-2 管理當局短視行為文獻彙總表-屬實證分析者...............11
表2.2-1 投資人偏好與類別之文獻彙總表-屬書籍論述者.............18
表2.2-2 投資人偏好與類別之文獻彙總表-屬實證分析者.............18
表2.3-1 國外管理決策與機構投資人持股關係之文獻彙總表..........23
表2.3-2 國內管理決策與機構投資人持股關係之文獻彙總表..........24
表2.4-1 國外影響公司研發支出決策相關因素之文獻彙總表..........29
表2.4-2 國內影響公司研發支出決策相關因素之文獻彙總表..........30
表3.2-1 各項變數衡量方式及預期與CUTRD關係.....................40
表3.4-1 各樣本之定義及衡量方式................................42
表4.1-1 持股比例議題下各樣本的EBTRD變動情形比較表.............45
表4.1-2 持股比例議題下各樣本間不同投資人持股比例情形比較表....46
表4.1-3 持股比例議題下各樣本的公司規模比較表..................46
表4.1-4 持股比例議題下各樣本間每股研發支出之比較表............47
表4.1-5 持股比例議題下各樣本產業分佈..........................48
表4.1-6 持股比例議題下SD樣本Logistic模式分析結果..............50
表4.1-7 持股比例議題下SD樣本中之CHOW TEST結果.................50
表4.1-8 持股比例議題下機構投資人持股比例小於3.94%之迴歸結果...51
表4.1-9 持股比例議題下機構投資人持股比例大於3.94%之迴歸結果...51
表4.1-10 持股比例議題下樣本依CHOW TEST處理後之產業分佈表......51
表4.1-11 持股比例變動議題下變動下各樣本的EBTRD差異情形比較表..53
表4.1-12 持股比例變動議題下各樣本間不同投資人持股比例情形比較
表...................................................54
表4.1-13 持股比例變動議題下各樣本的公司規模比較表.............54
表4.1-14 持股比例變動議題下各樣本的每股研發支出之比較表.......55
表4.1-15 持股比例變動下各群樣本產業分佈表.....................56
表4.2-1 持股比例議題下各樣本之特性............................58
表4.2-2 Cut樣本和Increase樣本的敘述性統計....................59
表4.2-3 SD樣本中各自變數之相關係數...........................61
表4.2-4 SD樣本之共線性檢定...................................62
表4.2-5 持股比例議題下電子類與非電子類樣本中機構投資人持股比例
情形..................................................63
表4.2-6 持股比例議題下電子類與非電子類樣本中每股研發支出情形..63
表4.2-7 持股比例變動議題下SD、IN和LD樣本的敘述性統計..........64
表4.2-8 持股比例變動議題下電子與非電子類樣本機構投資人持股比例
變動情形..............................................65
表4.2-9 持股比例變動議題下電子類與非電子類樣本中每股研發支
出情形................................................65
表4.2-10 持股比例變動議題下電子類股中不同樣本之每股研發支出情
形...................................................66
表4.3-1 持股比例議題下SD、IN與LD樣本的Logistic模式分析結果....69
表4.3-2 持股比例議題下機構、僑外、個人持股樣本之Logistic模式
分析結果表............................................70
表4.3-3 持股比例議題下SD樣本中電子、非電子公司之Logistic模式
分析結果..............................................72
表4.4-1 持股比例變動議題下各群樣本的Logistic模式分析結果
表....................................................74
表4.4-2 持股比例變動議題下機構、僑外、個人持股樣本之Logistic
模式分析結果表........................................75
表4.4-3 持股比例變動議題下Positive與Negative樣本之Logistic模式
分析結果..............................................77
表4.4-4 持股比例變動議題下電子、非電子類股樣本之Logistic迴歸
模式比較表............................................78
表4.4-5 持股比例變動議題下電子類股機構投資人持股比例增減變動
簡單迴歸結果..........................................79
表4.4-6 持股比例變動議題下非電子類股機構投資人持股比例增減變動
簡單迴歸結果..........................................80
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 15333 bytes-
dc.format.extent 377278 bytes-
dc.format.extent 19957 bytes-
dc.format.extent 16310 bytes-
dc.format.extent 15122 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090353040en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 管理當局短視zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 機構投資人持股比例zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 盈餘管理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公司治理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) management myopicen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) ownership of institutional investoren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) earning managementen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) corporation governanceen_US
dc.title (題名) 管理當局短視行為與機構投資人持股比例關係:企業研發支出之實證研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王金凱,1987,我國製造業廠商研究發展決定因素之研究,國立台灣大學經濟研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 朱建州,1999,機構投資人與月營收資訊內涵之關聯性研究-以台灣股市為例,國立中正大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 金成隆、林修葳、張永芳,2000,強制性財務預測誤差與盈餘管理關係:20%門檻限制影響之研究,中國財務學刊,第7卷第1期:59-96。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林威伸,1997,企業研究發展與專利權間之遞延效應,私立東吳大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬維揚,1988,民間研究發展之促進,私立東吳大學經濟學研究所未出版之論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許周全,2000,機構投資人與管理當局自願性盈餘預測之關聯性研究,國立台北大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳忠榮,1995,技術引進與研究發展:台灣高科技廠商之實證分析,國科會補助研究計畫。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐君毅,2001,研發與廣告支出與企業價值變動之因果關係研究,私立東海大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃明潔,2002,多期損益平穩化行為之決定因素,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版之論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃雅苓,1998,研究發展支出與經營績效關係及其費用化之探討─以台灣上市公司電子與非電子業為例,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梁玲菁,1988,我國資訊電子業研究與發展決定因素之研究,國立中興大學經濟研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 湯珮妤,2000,企業類型與研發支出、專利權成效之遞延效果研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 溫順德,2002,企業研究發展支出租稅減免問題及其影響之研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 董秋梅,1999,機構投資人對企業R&D活動之影響,國立交通大學經營管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭嘉珮、劉錦添,1992,台灣廠商研究發展支出的分析,台灣銀行季刊,第45卷第2期:139-152。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Albrecht, J.A. 1999. Policy instruments and incentives for environmental R&D: A market-driven approach. Working paper, University of Ghent-Ceen.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baber, W., P. Fairfield, and J. Haggard. 1991. The effect of concern about reported income on discretionary spending decisions: The case of research and development. The Accounting Review 66: 818-829.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) , S. Janakiraman, and S. Kang. 1996. Investment opportunities and the structure of executive compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21: 297-318.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Badrinath, S., G. Gay, and J. Kale. 1989. Patterns of institutional investment, prudence, and the managerial ”safety-net” hypothesis. Journal of Risk and Insurance 56 (December): 605-629.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barth, M., J. Elliott, and M. Finn. 1997. Market rewards associated with increasing earnings patterns. Working paper, Standford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bebchuk, L., and L. Stole. 1993. Do short-term objectives lead to under- or overinvestment in long-term projects? Journal of Finance 48: 719-729.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Beldona, S., A. Inkpen, and A. Phatak. 1998. Are Japanese managers more long-term oriented than United States managers? Management International Review 38 (March): 239-256.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ben-Zion, U. 1984. The R&D and investment decision and its relationship to the firm’s market value: Some preliminary results. Patents and Productivity, edited by Z. Griliches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Berger, P. 1993. Explicit and implicit tax effects of the R&D tax credit. Journal of Accounting Research 31 (Autumn): 131-171.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brancato,C. K. 1997. Institutional investors and corporate governance: Best Practices for increasing corporate value, Chicago, IL: Irwin. Professional Publishing.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bronwyn, H., M. Jacques, B. Lee, and C.Bruno. 1998. Does cash flow investment and R&D? An exploration using panel data for French, Japanese, and United States scientific firms. Working paper. University of California.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, K., and B. Brooke. 1993. Institutional demand and security price pressure: The case of corporate spin-offs. Financial Analysts Journal 49 (September/October): 53-62.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burgstahler, D., and I. Dichev . 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting & Economics 24 ( December): 99-126.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bushee, B. 1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Review 73 (July): 305-33.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) . 2001. Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-term value? Contemporary Accounting Research 18 (Sumnmer): 207-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) , and C .Noe. 1999. Disclosure quality, institutional investors, and stock return volatility. Working paper. University of Pennsylvania.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Campbell, T.S., and A. M. Marino. 1994. Myopic investment decisions and competitive labor markets. International Economic Review 35 (November): 855-75.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cheng, S. 2002. R&D expenditures and CEO compensation. Working paper. University of Michigan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cohen, W., and S. Klepper. 1996. Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (2): 232-243.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DeAngelo, H., and E. Rice. 1983. Antitakeover charter amendments and stockholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 11 (April): 329-59.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DeAngelo, L. E. 1988. Managerial competition, information costs and corporation governance: The use of accounting performance measures in proxy contests. Journal of Accounting and Economics 10 (January): 3-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dechow, P., and R. Sloan. 1991. Executive incentives and horizon problem : An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 14 (March): 51-89.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) , , and A. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulations : An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (Spring): 1-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dobrzynski, J. 1993. Relationship investing. Business Week 3309 ( March 15): 68-75.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duke, J ., and H. Hunt. 1990. An empirical examination of debt covenant restrictions and accounting-related debt proxies. Journal of Accounting and Economics 12 (January): 45-63.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) El Sawy, O. 1988. Temporal biases in strategic attention. Working paper, University of Southern California.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eng, L., and M. Shackell. 2001. The implications of long-term performance plans and institutional ownership for firms’ research and development investments. Journal of Accounting, Auditing& Finance 16: 117-139.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Froot, K., A. Perold, and J. Stein. 1992. Shareholder trading practices and corporate investment horizons. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance: 42-58.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fudenberg, D., and J. Tirole. 1986. A signal-jamming theory of predation. Rand Journal of Economics.ⅩⅤⅠⅠ: 366-76.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grabowski, H.G., and N. D. Baxter. 1973. Rivalry in industrial research and development. Journal of Industrial Economics: 209-35.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) , and D. C. Mueller. 1978. Industrial research and development, intangible capital stocks, and firm profit rates. Bell Journal of Economics: 328-43.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Graves, S. A., and S. Waddock. 1990. Institutional ownership and control: Implication for long-term corporate strategy. Academy of Management Executive 4 (February) : 75-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Graves, S. B. 1988. Institutional ownership and corporate R&D in the computer industry . Academy of Management Journal 31: 417-427.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hand, J. 1990. A test of the extended functional fixation hypothesis. The Accounting Review 65 (October): 740-763.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) . 2001. The economic versus accounting impacts of R&D on U.S. Market-to-book ratios. Working paper. University of North Carolina.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hemmer, T. 1996. On the design and choice of “modern” management accounting measures. Journal of Management Accounting Research 8: 87-116.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hirschey, M. 1985. Market structure and market value. Journal of Business: 89-99.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hirshleifer, D., and T. Chordia. 1992. Managerial incentives to manipulate the timing of project resolution. Working paper. Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Holmstrom, B. 1982. Managerial incentive problems-a dynamic perpective. In Essays in Economics and Management in Honor of Lars Wahlbeck. Helsinki: Swedish School of Economics.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jacobs, M. 1991. Short-Term America: The Causes and Cures of Our Business Myopia. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jalilvand, A., and R. Harris. 1984. Corporate behavior in adjusting to capital structure and dividend targets: An econometric study. Journal of Finance 39 (March) : 127-145.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jarrell, G.A., K. Lehn, and W. Marr. 1985 . Institutional ownership, tender offers and long-term investments. Working paper. Office of the Chief Economist, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) , and A. Poulsen. 1987. Shark repellents and stock prices: The effects of antitakeover amendments since 1980. Journal of Financial Economics 19 (September): 127-68.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jensen, M. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review 76: 323-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 1992. The balanced-scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review(Jan/Feb):71-79.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) , .1996. The balanced-scorecard. Harvard University Press, Boston.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kennedy, P. 1992. A Guide to Econometrics. 3d edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kim, J., I. Krinsky., and J. Lee. 1997. Institutional holdings and trading volume reactions to quarterly earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance 12 (Winter): 1-14.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Laughhunn, D., J. Payne., and R.Crum. 1980. Managerial risk preference for below-target returns. Management Science 26: 1238-1249.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Linn, S., and J. McConnell. 1983. An empirical investigation of the impact of antitakeover amendments on common stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics 11 (April): 361-99.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Loescher, S. M. 1984. Bureaucratic measurement, shutting stock share, and shortened time horizons: Implication for Economic growth. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 24 (April): 8-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Meulbroek, L., M. Mitchell, H. Mulherin, J. Netter, and A. Poulsen. 1990. Shark repellents and managerial myopia: An empirical test. Journal of Political Economy 98: 1108-1117.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Monks, R., and N. Minow. 1995. Corporate Governance. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Myers, S . 1984. The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance 39 (Judy): 575-592.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nanus, B. 1975. The future-oriented corporation. Business Horizons 18 (January): 5-12.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Narayanan, M. 1985. Managerial incentives for short-term results. The Journal of Finance 5: 1469-84.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Opler, T., and J. Sokobin. 1997. Does coordinated institutional shareholder activism work? An analysis of the activities of the Council of Institutional Investors. Working paper. Ohio State University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Perry, S., and R. Grinaker. 1994. Earnings expectations and discretionary research and development spending. Accounting Horizons 8 (December): 43-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Porter, M. 1992. Capital Choices: Changing the Way America Invests in Industry. Boston, MA: Council on Competitiveness/Harvard Bussiness School.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rajgopal, S., and M. Venkatachalam. 1998. The role of institutional investors in corporate governance: An empirical investigation. Working paper. University of Washington.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shavell, S. 1979. Risk sharing and incentives in the principal and agent relationship. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 55-73.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1990. Equilibrium short horizons of investors and firms. American Economic Review 80: 148-153.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Solow, R. M. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics (August): 312-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stein, J. 1988. Takeover threats and managerial myopia. Journal of Political Economy 96 (February): 61-80.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) . 1989. Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporate behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 (November): 655-669.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thevaranjan, A., K. Joseph, and D. Shinivasan. 2000. Managerial myopia and non-financial measures: The case of customer satisfaction mitigating hard-selling. Working paper. Syracuse University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tobin, J. 1969. A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking: 15-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tse, D., K. Lee, L. Vertinsky, and D. Wehrung. 1988. Does culture matter? A cross-cultural study of executives’ choice, decisiveness and risk adjustment in international marketing. Journal of Marketing 52: 81-95.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wiedman, C. 1996. The relevance of characteristics of the information environment in the selection of a proxy for the market’s expectations for earnings: An extension of Brown, Richardson, and Schwager(1987). Journal of Accounting Research 34 (Autumn): 313-324zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yin, X., and E. Zuscovitch. 1998. Is firm size conducive to R&D choice? A strategic analysis of product and process innovations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 35: 243-262.zh_TW