學術產出-學位論文

題名 組織之人力資本對市場價值及財務績效影響之研究
作者 黃聖茵
貢獻者 吳安妮
黃聖茵
關鍵詞 智慧資本
人力資本
市場價值
財務績效
Intellectual capital
human capital
market value
financial performance
日期 2003
上傳時間 18-九月-2009 09:00:53 (UTC+8)
摘要 隨著知識經濟時代來臨,知識在組織經營中扮演日益重要的角色,知識擁有者對於組織而言即為人力資本。組織應瞭解知識擁有者能為組織創造多少效益,從而進行人力資源管理,以求長期競爭優勢。因此人力資本在組織中益顯重要,故本研究擬探討人力資本對組織市場價值與財務績效之影響情況。

本研究以我國上市及上櫃公司為研究對象,包含資訊電子(光電、半導體、資訊通訊服務、資訊家電)、生物科技、食品、化學材料、紡織等產業進行探討。研究期間為2001年至2003年,以複迴歸方式從事實證模型分析。

本研究主要探討議題共分為兩部分:
一、人力資本對組織市場價值之影響:本研究以市場價值及M/B Ratio當為應變數,研發人數、員工向心力為自變數。

二、人力資本對組織財務績效之影響:以每人營業收入、每人營業毛利、每人稅前營業利益為應變數,自變數為:研發人數、員工向心力等。

本研究之實證結果發現:研發人數對組織市場價值與組織財務績效有正向影響,而員工向心力對組織M/B Ratio也有正向影響。另外,智慧資本的投資通常會為企業帶來數年的效益,人力資本也不例外,因此本研究另外針對遞延一期之組織市值及財務績效進行分析,實證結果研究也發現:研發人數對組織財務績效具有部分遞延效益。

根據實證結果,本研究建議組織應加強對人力資本之重視,俾提升其市場價值及財務績效。另外,對於後續研究者而言,由於人力資本之指標因各文獻採用不一,故未來學者應再針對不同指標進行探討,並加以彙整,或許對組織市場價值與財務績效影響因子可能會有更深入及明確之瞭解。
With the coming of the age of knowledge economy, knowledge plays a very important role in organizations. Knowledge-owners are regarded as “Human Capital” in organizations. Managers should understand how many benefits the knowledge-owners will bring to the organizations, and use their Human Resource Management (HRM) policies effectively to retain the long-term competition advantages. Human capital becomes more and more important, so this study is intent to examine the effect of human capital upon the market value and financial performance of the organizations.

The two main themes of this study are:
1. The effect of human capital on market value of the organizations. The dependent variable are: market value and M/B Ratio; and the independent variable are: number of R&D workers and employee loyalty.
2. The effect of human capital on financial performance of the organizations. The dependent variable are: revenue per employee, gross profit per employee, and operating income per employee; and the independent variable are: number of R&D workers and employee loyalty.

The results show that “R&D workers” has both positive effect on market value and financial performance of the organizations; “employee loyalty” has positive effect on M/B Ratio, too. In addition, human capital has partial lagged effects.

According to the results, this study suggests that the organizations should pay more attention to their human capital to promote their market value and financial performance. Moreover, for future researchers, they could examine different human capital indexes. It may allow us to have a thorough understanding about the influence of human capital on market value and financial performance of the organizations.
參考文獻 一、 中文部分
中國時報,2002.12.3,施振榮張忠謀促培養高科技人才(二十二版)。
吳秀娟,2000,企業市場價值與淨值差異影響因素之研究-以我國資訊電子業為例,國立政治大學會計系碩士班未發表論文。
李貴富,2002,智慧資本創造活動之商業價值:以我國高科技產業訓練活動為例,國立政治大學會計系碩士班未發表論文。
周齊武與Shields, M. D.,1994,科技改變、競爭、組織規模對管理會計組成問題之影響:以美國製造業公司為證,會計評論,第28期,頁103-128。
林正銘,2002,人力資源管理活動對組織績效的影響─同期與遞延效果之探討,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班論文。
林宏達,2004,中華電信組織改造,e天下雜誌,第40期(四月),頁69。
林明德,2003,無形資產之價值攸關性與決定因素之探討,國立政治大學會計系碩士班未發表論文。
林首毅,2003,人力資源管理活動對組織績效的影響,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士班論文。
邱義誠,1992,管理叢林的開山刀,管理雜誌,第225期,頁30-34。
馬維揚,1997,我國高科技產業經營環境與策略之探討,台北銀行月刊,第27卷,第5期,頁34-52。
陳雅慧,2004,二零零四年一千大CEO大調查-即使政局動盪也要樂觀向前,天下雜誌,第297期(四月):96-108。
黃曉惠,2003我國資訊電子業研發部門特質對經營績效之影響,國立政治大學會計系碩士班未發表論文。
楊文翔,2003,競爭策略、人力資源管理與市場績效的關係,國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士班論文。
溫士賢,2003,研發、廣告與人力支出和企業價值之關聯性探討-以台灣上市上櫃公司為例,國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士班論文。
趙子沛,2002,人力資本資訊揭露與市場績效關聯性之研究,國立中正大學會計學研究所碩士班論文。
二、英文部分
Abbey, A., and J. Discon. 1983. R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. Academy of Management Vol. 26(2): 362-368.
Backhuijs, J. B., W. G. M. Holterman, R. S. Oudman, R. P. M. Overgoor, and S. M. Zijlstra. 1999. Reporting on intangible assets. International Symposium Measuring and Reporting Intellectual Capital: Experiences, OECD (Amsterdam, June)
Bae, J., and J. Lawler. 2000. Organizational and HRM strategies in Korea: Impact on firm performance in an emerging economy. Academy of Management Journal Vol. 43(3): 502-517.
Bates, A. 2002. What drives profit in franchising? Franchising World Vol. 34(3): 46-47.
Berman, M., J. West, and X. Wang. 1999. Using performance measurement in human resource management. Review of Public Personnel Administration 19(2): 5-17.
Bernstein, A., and J. Wild. 2000. Analysis of financial statements. McGraw-Hill.
Bird, A., and S. Beechler. 1995. Links between business strategy and human resource management strategy in U.S.-based Japanese subsidiaries: an empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies 26(1): 23-46.
Boer, P. 1999. The valuation of technology: business and financial issues in R&D, New York, NY: John Willey & Sons.
Bontis, N., and J. Fitz-enz. 2002. Intellectual capital ROI: A causal map of human capital antecedents and consequents. Journal of Intellectual Capital 3(3): 223-247.
Bradley, K. 1996. Intellectual capital and the new wealth of nations. Ph.D. dissertation, Open Business School, U.K.
Christopher, B. 2001. Measuring the mission effect in human intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital Vol. 2(3): 320 -330.
David, M., J. Jennifer, and P. Banfield.1993. Human resource development. W&K Publishing Co.
Drizin, M., and A. Schneider. 2004. Understanding the connection between loyalty and profit. Employment Relations Today Vol. 30(4): 43-54.
Edvinsson, L., and M. S. Malone. 1997. Intellectual capital: realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden roots, Harper Collins.
Fey, F., I. Bjorkman and A. Pavlovskaya. 2000. The effect of human resource management practices on firm performance in Russia. International Journal of Human Resource Management 11(1): 1-18.
Heskett, J., T. Jones, G. Loveman, E.Sasser, and L. Schlesinger. 1994. Putting the service profit chain to work. Harvard Business Review (March-April): 164-174.
Holzer, J., R. Block, M. Cheathea, and J. Knott. 1993. Are training subsidies for firms effective? The Michigan experience. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 46(4): 625-636.
Johanson, U., G.. Eklov, M. Holmgren, and M. Martensson. 1999. Human resource costing and accounting versus the Balanced Scorecard: A literature survey of experience with the concepts. International Symposium Measuring Reporting Intellectual Capital: Experiences, OECD (Amsterdam, June)
Joia, L. 2000. Using intellectual capital to evaluate educational technology aaaaprojects. Journal of Intellectual Capital Vol. 1(4): 341-356.
Lado, A., and M. Wilson. 1994. Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based perspective. The Academy of Management Review Vol. 19(4): 699-727.
Leonard-Barton, D.1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal Vol. 13(Summer): 111-125.
Lev, B. 1996. Boundaries on financial reporting. SEC.
Low, J. 2000. The value creation index. Journal of Intellectual Capital Vol. 1(3): 252-262.
Mak, M., and S. Akhtar. 2003. Human resource management practices, strategic orientations, and company performance: A correlation study of publicity listed companies. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge 2(Mar): 510-515.
Mayo, A. 2000. The role of employee development in the growth of intellectual capital. Personnel Review 29(4): 521-533.
Miller, M., B. D. DuPont, V. Fera, R. Jeffrey, B. Mahon, B. M. Payer, and A. Starr. 1999. Measuring and reporting intellectual capital from a diverse Canadian industry perspective. International Symposium Measuring Reporting Intellectual Capital: Experiences, OECD (Amsterdam, June)
Millett, S. 1990. The strategy management of technological R&D: An ideal process for 1990`s. International Journal of Technology Management Vol. 5(2): 153-163.
O`Donnell, D., P. O`Regan, B. Coates, T. Kennedy, and G. Berkery. 2003. Human interaction: The critical source of intangible value. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(1): 82-99.
Wah, L. 1999. Making knowledge stick. Management Review Vol. 88(5): 24.
White, I., A. Sondhi, and D. Fried. 1998. The analysis and use of financial statements. John Wiley & Sons.
Wier, B., D. Stone, and J. Hunton. 2002. Promotion and performance evaluation of managerial accountants. Journal of Management Accounting Research 14: 189-208.
三、網站資料
新華網,2003,http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/fortune/200310/24/content_1139996.htm
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
91353023
92
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091353023
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳安妮zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 黃聖茵zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 黃聖茵zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2003en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-九月-2009 09:00:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-九月-2009 09:00:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-九月-2009 09:00:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0091353023en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34210-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91353023zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 隨著知識經濟時代來臨,知識在組織經營中扮演日益重要的角色,知識擁有者對於組織而言即為人力資本。組織應瞭解知識擁有者能為組織創造多少效益,從而進行人力資源管理,以求長期競爭優勢。因此人力資本在組織中益顯重要,故本研究擬探討人力資本對組織市場價值與財務績效之影響情況。

本研究以我國上市及上櫃公司為研究對象,包含資訊電子(光電、半導體、資訊通訊服務、資訊家電)、生物科技、食品、化學材料、紡織等產業進行探討。研究期間為2001年至2003年,以複迴歸方式從事實證模型分析。

本研究主要探討議題共分為兩部分:
一、人力資本對組織市場價值之影響:本研究以市場價值及M/B Ratio當為應變數,研發人數、員工向心力為自變數。

二、人力資本對組織財務績效之影響:以每人營業收入、每人營業毛利、每人稅前營業利益為應變數,自變數為:研發人數、員工向心力等。

本研究之實證結果發現:研發人數對組織市場價值與組織財務績效有正向影響,而員工向心力對組織M/B Ratio也有正向影響。另外,智慧資本的投資通常會為企業帶來數年的效益,人力資本也不例外,因此本研究另外針對遞延一期之組織市值及財務績效進行分析,實證結果研究也發現:研發人數對組織財務績效具有部分遞延效益。

根據實證結果,本研究建議組織應加強對人力資本之重視,俾提升其市場價值及財務績效。另外,對於後續研究者而言,由於人力資本之指標因各文獻採用不一,故未來學者應再針對不同指標進行探討,並加以彙整,或許對組織市場價值與財務績效影響因子可能會有更深入及明確之瞭解。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) With the coming of the age of knowledge economy, knowledge plays a very important role in organizations. Knowledge-owners are regarded as “Human Capital” in organizations. Managers should understand how many benefits the knowledge-owners will bring to the organizations, and use their Human Resource Management (HRM) policies effectively to retain the long-term competition advantages. Human capital becomes more and more important, so this study is intent to examine the effect of human capital upon the market value and financial performance of the organizations.

The two main themes of this study are:
1. The effect of human capital on market value of the organizations. The dependent variable are: market value and M/B Ratio; and the independent variable are: number of R&D workers and employee loyalty.
2. The effect of human capital on financial performance of the organizations. The dependent variable are: revenue per employee, gross profit per employee, and operating income per employee; and the independent variable are: number of R&D workers and employee loyalty.

The results show that “R&D workers” has both positive effect on market value and financial performance of the organizations; “employee loyalty” has positive effect on M/B Ratio, too. In addition, human capital has partial lagged effects.

According to the results, this study suggests that the organizations should pay more attention to their human capital to promote their market value and financial performance. Moreover, for future researchers, they could examine different human capital indexes. It may allow us to have a thorough understanding about the influence of human capital on market value and financial performance of the organizations.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論…………………………………….………1
第一節 研究動機與目的.……………………………….…1
第二節 研究問題……………………..……………………4
第三節 研究架構…………….….…………………………6
第二章 文獻探討………………………………….8
第一節 與人力資本重要性相關之文獻…………………8
第二節 人力資本對市場價值之影響….….………….…..11
第三節 人力資本對財務績效之影響…….…………..….17
第四節 研究延伸…………………….………….….…….26
第三章 研究方法…………………………………28
第一節 觀念性架構……………………………….…….28
第二節 研究假說………………………………….…….29
第三節 變數衡量…………….….………………………33
第四節 實證模型…………………………………………38
第五節 資料分析方法…………………………………..39
第六節 研究期間與研究樣本…………………………..40
第七節 資料來源………………………………………..41
第四章 實證結果……………………………………43
第一節 敘述性統計..……………….…………………..43
第二節 迴歸分析之基本假設檢定……………………. 44
第三節 迴歸分析結果…………………………………..45
第四節 額外變數分析-產業分析………………………55
第五章 結論與建議…………………………………63
第一節 研究結論………………………………………..63
第二節 研究限制………………………………………..67
第三節 研究建議……………….………………………..68
參考文獻………………………………………..…..70
附錄、其他應變數之實證結果……………………74

圖目錄

圖1-1 本研究之研究流程圖……………………………………………….7
圖3-1 觀念性架構圖………………………………………………………28


表目錄
表1-1 台灣部分資訊電子公司M/B Ratio比較表…………………………..2
表2-1 與人力資本重要性相關之文獻彙總表………..……………………10
表2-2 人力資本對市場價值影響文獻彙總表……………..……..…..……15
表2-3 人力資本對財務績效影響文獻彙總表……………………………23
表2-4 本研究研究延伸彙總表……………………………….…..………27
表3-1 本研究應變數一覽表………………..……………….……………34
表3-2 本研究自變數及控制變數一覽表…….…………….………………37
表3-3 樣本公司之產業資訊…………………….….………………………40
表3-4 變數資料來源……………………….……………………….………42
表4-1 敘述性統計表…………….………………………………………..43
表4-2 Pearson 相關係數表…….……..…………….………….…………..44
表4-3 自變數及控制變數變數之VIF…………………………………...…44
表4-4 迴歸分析結果-市場價值-當期分析…………………..…………45
表4-5 迴歸分析結果-M/B Ratio-當期分析……………..………...……46
表4-6 迴歸分析結果-每人營業收入-當期分析………….……….……47
表4-7 迴歸分析結果-每人營業毛利-當期分析…………….……….…48
表4-8 迴歸分析結果-每人稅前營業利益-當期分析……………..……49
表4-9 迴歸分析結果-市場價值-遞延一期分析………………...….…..50
表4-10 迴歸分析結果-M/B Ratio-遞延一期分析……..……..………….51
表4-11 迴歸分析結果-每人營業收入-遞延一期分析……..……..……..51
表4-12 迴歸分析結果-每人營業毛利-遞延一期分析……..……..……..52
表4-13 迴歸分析結果-每人稅前營業利益-遞延一期分析…..…..……..53
表4-14 迴歸分析結果-市場價值-產業分析……………..………………56
表4-15 產業分析自變數與控制變數之VIF值…..…….……..………...…..57
表4-16 迴歸分析結果-M/B Ratio-產業分析…………….………..……..57
表4-17 迴歸分析結果-每人營業收入-產業分析….….……………..…..59
表4-18 迴歸分析結果-每人營業毛利-產業分析……….…….…………60
表4-19 迴歸分析結果-每人稅前營業利益-產業分析.………………….61
表5-1 本研究之結論彙總……………………………….…………….……66
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 52357 bytes-
dc.format.extent 97457 bytes-
dc.format.extent 83770 bytes-
dc.format.extent 76388 bytes-
dc.format.extent 117983 bytes-
dc.format.extent 199282 bytes-
dc.format.extent 186837 bytes-
dc.format.extent 353281 bytes-
dc.format.extent 118389 bytes-
dc.format.extent 98076 bytes-
dc.format.extent 108608 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091353023en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 智慧資本zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 人力資本zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 市場價值zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 財務績效zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Intellectual capitalen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) human capitalen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) market valueen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) financial performanceen_US
dc.title (題名) 組織之人力資本對市場價值及財務績效影響之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、 中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中國時報,2002.12.3,施振榮張忠謀促培養高科技人才(二十二版)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳秀娟,2000,企業市場價值與淨值差異影響因素之研究-以我國資訊電子業為例,國立政治大學會計系碩士班未發表論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李貴富,2002,智慧資本創造活動之商業價值:以我國高科技產業訓練活動為例,國立政治大學會計系碩士班未發表論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周齊武與Shields, M. D.,1994,科技改變、競爭、組織規模對管理會計組成問題之影響:以美國製造業公司為證,會計評論,第28期,頁103-128。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林正銘,2002,人力資源管理活動對組織績效的影響─同期與遞延效果之探討,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林宏達,2004,中華電信組織改造,e天下雜誌,第40期(四月),頁69。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林明德,2003,無形資產之價值攸關性與決定因素之探討,國立政治大學會計系碩士班未發表論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林首毅,2003,人力資源管理活動對組織績效的影響,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士班論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱義誠,1992,管理叢林的開山刀,管理雜誌,第225期,頁30-34。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬維揚,1997,我國高科技產業經營環境與策略之探討,台北銀行月刊,第27卷,第5期,頁34-52。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳雅慧,2004,二零零四年一千大CEO大調查-即使政局動盪也要樂觀向前,天下雜誌,第297期(四月):96-108。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃曉惠,2003我國資訊電子業研發部門特質對經營績效之影響,國立政治大學會計系碩士班未發表論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊文翔,2003,競爭策略、人力資源管理與市場績效的關係,國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士班論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 溫士賢,2003,研發、廣告與人力支出和企業價值之關聯性探討-以台灣上市上櫃公司為例,國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士班論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 趙子沛,2002,人力資本資訊揭露與市場績效關聯性之研究,國立中正大學會計學研究所碩士班論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Abbey, A., and J. Discon. 1983. R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. Academy of Management Vol. 26(2): 362-368.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Backhuijs, J. B., W. G. M. Holterman, R. S. Oudman, R. P. M. Overgoor, and S. M. Zijlstra. 1999. Reporting on intangible assets. International Symposium Measuring and Reporting Intellectual Capital: Experiences, OECD (Amsterdam, June)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bae, J., and J. Lawler. 2000. Organizational and HRM strategies in Korea: Impact on firm performance in an emerging economy. Academy of Management Journal Vol. 43(3): 502-517.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bates, A. 2002. What drives profit in franchising? Franchising World Vol. 34(3): 46-47.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Berman, M., J. West, and X. Wang. 1999. Using performance measurement in human resource management. Review of Public Personnel Administration 19(2): 5-17.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bernstein, A., and J. Wild. 2000. Analysis of financial statements. McGraw-Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bird, A., and S. Beechler. 1995. Links between business strategy and human resource management strategy in U.S.-based Japanese subsidiaries: an empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies 26(1): 23-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Boer, P. 1999. The valuation of technology: business and financial issues in R&D, New York, NY: John Willey & Sons.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bontis, N., and J. Fitz-enz. 2002. Intellectual capital ROI: A causal map of human capital antecedents and consequents. Journal of Intellectual Capital 3(3): 223-247.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bradley, K. 1996. Intellectual capital and the new wealth of nations. Ph.D. dissertation, Open Business School, U.K.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Christopher, B. 2001. Measuring the mission effect in human intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital Vol. 2(3): 320 -330.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) David, M., J. Jennifer, and P. Banfield.1993. Human resource development. W&K Publishing Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Drizin, M., and A. Schneider. 2004. Understanding the connection between loyalty and profit. Employment Relations Today Vol. 30(4): 43-54.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Edvinsson, L., and M. S. Malone. 1997. Intellectual capital: realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden roots, Harper Collins.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fey, F., I. Bjorkman and A. Pavlovskaya. 2000. The effect of human resource management practices on firm performance in Russia. International Journal of Human Resource Management 11(1): 1-18.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Heskett, J., T. Jones, G. Loveman, E.Sasser, and L. Schlesinger. 1994. Putting the service profit chain to work. Harvard Business Review (March-April): 164-174.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Holzer, J., R. Block, M. Cheathea, and J. Knott. 1993. Are training subsidies for firms effective? The Michigan experience. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 46(4): 625-636.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Johanson, U., G.. Eklov, M. Holmgren, and M. Martensson. 1999. Human resource costing and accounting versus the Balanced Scorecard: A literature survey of experience with the concepts. International Symposium Measuring Reporting Intellectual Capital: Experiences, OECD (Amsterdam, June)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Joia, L. 2000. Using intellectual capital to evaluate educational technology aaaaprojects. Journal of Intellectual Capital Vol. 1(4): 341-356.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lado, A., and M. Wilson. 1994. Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based perspective. The Academy of Management Review Vol. 19(4): 699-727.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Leonard-Barton, D.1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal Vol. 13(Summer): 111-125.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lev, B. 1996. Boundaries on financial reporting. SEC.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Low, J. 2000. The value creation index. Journal of Intellectual Capital Vol. 1(3): 252-262.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mak, M., and S. Akhtar. 2003. Human resource management practices, strategic orientations, and company performance: A correlation study of publicity listed companies. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge 2(Mar): 510-515.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mayo, A. 2000. The role of employee development in the growth of intellectual capital. Personnel Review 29(4): 521-533.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Miller, M., B. D. DuPont, V. Fera, R. Jeffrey, B. Mahon, B. M. Payer, and A. Starr. 1999. Measuring and reporting intellectual capital from a diverse Canadian industry perspective. International Symposium Measuring Reporting Intellectual Capital: Experiences, OECD (Amsterdam, June)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Millett, S. 1990. The strategy management of technological R&D: An ideal process for 1990`s. International Journal of Technology Management Vol. 5(2): 153-163.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) O`Donnell, D., P. O`Regan, B. Coates, T. Kennedy, and G. Berkery. 2003. Human interaction: The critical source of intangible value. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(1): 82-99.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wah, L. 1999. Making knowledge stick. Management Review Vol. 88(5): 24.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) White, I., A. Sondhi, and D. Fried. 1998. The analysis and use of financial statements. John Wiley & Sons.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wier, B., D. Stone, and J. Hunton. 2002. Promotion and performance evaluation of managerial accountants. Journal of Management Accounting Research 14: 189-208.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 三、網站資料zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 新華網,2003,http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/fortune/200310/24/content_1139996.htmzh_TW