| dc.contributor.advisor | 林良楓 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (作者) | 楊家瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 楊家瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2005 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 18-九月-2009 09:03:01 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 18-九月-2009 09:03:01 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 18-九月-2009 09:03:01 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) | G0093353013 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34222 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 會計研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 93353013 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 94 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本研究採用資料包絡分析法整合專利權產出價值與專利權效率來探討其對公司價值之關聯性。本研究除探討公司新發明與新型式專利的績效差異外，並同時以修正式Ohlson模型、股價報酬模型、及資產報酬率模型分別比較專利權在納入效率概念後與一般專利權產出何者對公司價值有較高的解釋能力。實證結果亦發現，新型與新式樣專利雖沒有較發明專利可以創造出較高的銷售價值，但相對而言，其投入成本卻可大幅減少，因此反而有較高的績效表現。此外專利權效率與公司價值之關聯性，在控制其他變數後僅修正式Ohlson模式顯示規模效率達到統計上之顯著水準。而在比較專利權效率與專利權產出對公司價值之測試中，不同模式下之Vuong test都顯示兩者並無差異。此結果顯示大部份的投資人多只注重創新的結果，而較不注重公司創新過程中成本效益的問題。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論.........................................1第一節 研究動機與目的................................1第二節 研究問題.....................................2第二章 文獻回顧.....................................4第一節 專利之概述 ................................4第二節 化學產業之概述................................5第三節 資料包絡分析法相關理論及應用....................6第四節 專利權效率之相關文獻探討.......................11第五節 無形資產價值之相關文獻探討.....................15第六節 專利權價值之相關文獻探討.......................17第三章 研究方法.....................................24第一節 研究假說.....................................24第二節 變數衡量.....................................25第三節 資料來源與處理................................34第四節 分析方法.....................................35第四章 實證結果與分析................................38第一節 假說一之實證結果與分析.........................38第二節 假說二之測試－專利權效率與公司價值之關聯性分析....45第三節 假說三之測試－專利權產出與公司價值之關聯性分析....53第四節 專利權效率及專利權產出與公司價值之關聯性比較......60第五章 結論與建議....................................62第一節 結論.........................................62第二節 建議.........................................63附錄一：專利權「價值」的估計過程.......................65附錄二：相關變數之Pearson分析.........................66參考文獻............................................68 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 65588 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 71988 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 60664 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 116615 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 252016 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 318308 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 206267 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 95332 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 142042 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 84793 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093353013 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 資料包絡分析法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 專利權效率 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 公司價值 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | 專利權績效與公司價值之關聯性研究-以我國化學產業為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中文部份： | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李哲偉，2002，專利分析對企業技術取得方式影響之研究。中原大學企業 管理學系碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李卉民，2003，無形資產價值對衡量相對經營效率及其變遷的影響，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 余政靖，2006，尋回消失中的基礎技術。技術尖兵，1月號：12-14。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 金成隆、林修葳、紀信義，2004，專利權價值攸關性之研究：以企業生命週期論，管理學報。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 徐于婷，2003，國科會補助我國綜合大學研發效率之評估，國立中正大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 孫增松，2004，台灣TFT-LCD產業生產力與效率分析。國立政治大學經濟學系碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 孫遜，2004，資料包絡分析法－理論與應用，台北：揚智文化事業股份有限公司 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 葉玉慧，2003，專利權、創新投資與公司價值創造關係之研究－以研發投資宣告為例，國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許文賢，1995，技術來源、技術能力與績效關係之研究，國立中正大學企業管理系碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳俊銘，2004，我國光電產業經營效率之研究-資料包絡分析法的應用。國立政治大學經濟學系碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳俞如，2004，公司治理與創新活動，2004會計理論與實務研討會論文集，國立雲林科技大學管理研究所。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 曾俊堯，2003，創新資本對經營績效與公司價值影響之研究，國立台北大學企業管理學系博士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 曾裕營，1994，台灣高科技產業研發相對效率之評估－以新竹科學園區廠商為例，國立中正大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉正田，1997，研究發展支出之效益及其資本化會計資訊對股票評價攸關性之研究，國立政治大學會計學系博士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄧秋菊，2002，商標價值之估計及其攸關性之探討，中原大學會計研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 廖義芳，2001，專利權與經營績效關係之研究：各項專利權之比較，國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 廖國翔，2004，台灣、日本、南韓筆記型電腦產業績效分析與比較。國立政治大學經濟學系碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄭國強，2004，廠商的專利行為與市場價值關聯－以全球半導體產業為例，世新大學管理學院財務金融系碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄭武順，2002，從化工產業走向新化工產業點燃新經濟的火苗，技術尖兵，1月號：18-19。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蕭志同、林裕凌、楊光嵐、連珮昀，2002，研究機構專利績效評估模式之建立分析－以工研院為例，產業論壇，第3卷，第2期：192-214。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鍾信男，2002，技術來源、技術能力、技術績效關係之實證研究－以傳統產業為例，國立中正大學企業管理系碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 英文部份： | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Amir, E., and B. Lev. 1996. Value-relevance of non-financial information: the wireless communication industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22: 3-30. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Anthony, J. H., and K. Ramesh. 1992. Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices. Journal of Accounting & Economics 15: 203-227. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Austin, D. 1993. An event study approach to measuring innovative output: the case of biotechnology. American Economic Review 83: 256-258. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Arrow, K. J. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, in the rate and direction of inventive activity: economic and social factors. NBER. Princeton: Princeton University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Banker, R. D., A. C. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper. 1984. Some model for the Estimation of Technical and Scale Efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science 30: 1078-1092. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Barth, M., M. Clinch., 1998. Revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets：Associations with share prices and non market-based estimates. Journal of Accounting Research 36：199-233. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bernstein, J., and M. I. Nadiri. 1991. Product demand, cost of production. Spillovers and the social rate of return to R&D. NBER Working Paper no. 3625. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bosworth, D., and M. Rogers. 2001. Market value, R&D and intellectual property: an empirical analysis of large Australian firms. The Economic Record 77 (239): 323-337. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Europeans Journal of Operational Research 2 (6): 429-444. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chapple W., A. Lockett, D. Siegel, and M. Wright. 2005. Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence. Research Policy 34: 369-384. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chung, K. H., and S. W. Pruitt. 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin’s Q. Financial Management 23 (Autumn): 70-74. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cooper, W. W., L. M. Seiford, and K. Tone. 2000. Data envelopment analysis-a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-software. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cockburn, I. and B. Griliches. 1987. Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market’s valuation of R&D and patent. AEA Papers and Proceedings 78(20): 419-423. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cockburn, I., and Z. Griliches. 1988. The estimation and measurement of spillover effects of R&D Investment. American Economic Review 78: 419-423. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cohen, W., R.C. Levin, and D.C. Mowery. 1987. Firm size and R&D intensity: a re-examination. Journal of Industrial Economics 35: 543-563 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dechow, P. M. 1994. Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 18 (January): 3-42 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fama, E. F., and K. R. French. 1992. The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance 2: 427-265 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Farrell, M. J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society-Series A 120(3): 253-290. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Griliches, Z.. 1981. Market value, R&D and patents. Economic Letters: 183-187. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hall, B.H. 1999. Innovation and market value. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 6984. Cambridge, MA. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jaffe, A. 1986. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms patents, profits, and market value. American Economic Review 76: 984-1001. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lev, B., and T. Sougiannis. 1996. The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting & Economics 21: 107-138. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pakes, A.. 1985. On patents, R&D, and the stock market rate of return. Journal of Political Economy 93: 390-409. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Revilla E, J. Sarkis, and A. Modrego. 2003. Evaluating performance of public-private research collaborations: A DEA analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 54: 165-174. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Romer, P.M. 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98(5): 71-102. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Seethamraju, C.. 2000. The value-relevance of trademarks. Ph.D. dissertation, New York University, New York, NY. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shane, H., and M. Klock. 1997. The relation between patent citations and Tobin’s Q in the semiconductor industry. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 9: 131-146. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Solow, R.M. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics 39(3), 312-320. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | SubbaNarasimha P. N., S. Ahmad, and S. N. Mallya. 2003. Technological knowledge and firm performance of pharmaceutical firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(1): 20-33. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tobin, J., and W. Brainard. 1968. Pitfalls in the financial model building. America Economic Review 58: 99-122. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Trajtenberg, M.. 1990. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand Journal of Economy 21 (1):172-187. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Vuong, Q. H. 1989. Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57（March）: 307-334. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zhen Deng. 2000. Patents, citations, and equity valuation. Ph.D. dissertation, New York University. | zh_TW |
