| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳明進 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (作者) | 丁文萍 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 丁文萍 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2007 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 18-九月-2009 09:08:47 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 18-九月-2009 09:08:47 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 18-九月-2009 09:08:47 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) | G0095353051 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34254 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 會計研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 95353051 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 96 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本文以除權息前後累積異常報酬率為應變數，探討稅額扣抵比率及股權集中度對除權息前後累積異常報酬率的影響。研究對象為民國88年至96年間分配盈餘的國內上市公司，排除行業性質特殊之金融業，以普通最小平方法從事實證模型分析。主要實證結果彙整如下：1.稅額扣抵比率與除權息前之累積異常報酬率呈顯著正相關，與除權息後之累積異常報酬率呈負相關，但較不顯著。此表示稅額扣抵比率的租稅因素影響在除權息前較為顯著，但在除權息後現象較不顯著。2.股權集中度與除權息前後之累積異常報酬率的關係均未達統計上顯著水準。產生此實證結果的可能解釋有二：（1）非稅成本的考量；（2）本文以股權集中度衡量可能並未真正捕捉到個人投資人的所得稅率。3.低稅額扣抵比率類的除權息前累積異常報酬率，較高稅額扣抵比率（基準）類樣本為低的現象，此與預期相符。但在其他加入類別虛擬變數的迴歸結果，並未發現在不同稅額扣抵比率或股權集中度下，會對除權息前後之累積異常報酬率有不同的影響。4.公司規模及股價淨值比與除權息前後累積異常報酬率均呈顯著正向關係；股利殖利率與除權息前累積異常報酬率呈顯著正向關係，而與除權息後之累積異常報酬率呈顯著負向關係。電子業別與除權息前之累積異常報酬率呈顯著負向關係，而與除權息後之累積異常報酬率呈顯著正向關係。在圖表的分析中，可看出高稅額扣抵比率或低股權集中度的樣本，其除權息前後累積異常報酬率波動較小，較不受除權息事件的影響。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The main purpose of this paper is to examine, before and after the ex-dividend day, the impacts of imputation credits and ownership concentration on cumulative abnormal returns(CARs). In this paper , CARs before and after the ex-dividend day are used as the dependent variable. The data are collected from the domestic listed companies which had allocated the earnings from 1999 to 2006. Because of its special characteristics, the financial industry is excluded from the data. In order to analyze the impacts of imputation credits and ownership concentration on CARs , we used the ordinary least squares. The empirical results in this paper are summarized as follows:1.The imputation credits have a significant positive impact on CARs before the ex-dividend day, but they don’t have a significant negative impact on CARs after the ex-dividend day. This phenomenon implies that the influence of tax factor before the ex-dividend day is more significant than that after the ex-dividend day. 2.The failure of finding a significant relation between ownership concentration and CARs of before and after the ex-dividend day maybe due to two reasons. Frist, investors may not take tax factor into account when they invest the stock. Second, the proxy variable for ownership concentration of this study may not fully capture the marginal income rate of individuals. 3.CARs before the ex-dividend day in listed company with lower imputation credit are lower than that in listed company with higher imputation credit, the empirical result matchs general intuition. But other regressions with dummy variables regarding the degree of the imputation credit and ownership concentration don’t find significant relation among the imputation credit, ownership concentration and CARs before and after the ex-dividend day.4.The size of companies and the ratio of market price to their book value have a significant positive impact on CARs before and after the ex-dividend day. Dividend yield has a significant positive impact on CARs before the ex-dividend day, but a negative impact on CARs after the ex-dividend day. A dummy variable standing for electronic industry has a significant negative impact on CARs before the ex-dividend day, but positive impact on CARs after the ex-dividend day.In the analysis of diagrams, we find CARs before and after the ex-dividend day fluctuate less for companies with higher imputed credit or lower ownership concentration. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………… 1 第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………… 1 第二節 研究問題……………………………………………………… 3 第三節 研究架構……………………………………………………… 4第二章 文獻回顧 …………………………………………………………… 6 第一節 除權除息日股價行為的相關假說…………………………… 6 第二節 國外相關文獻………………………………………………… 8 第三節 國內相關文獻………………………………………………… 16第三章 研究方法 ……………...……………………………………… 21 第一節 研究假說……………………………………………………… 21 第二節 模型介紹……………………………………………………… 25 第三節 變數說明 ………………………………………………………. 29 第四節 資料來源與樣本篩選………………………………………… 38第四章 實證結果…………………………………………………………… 40 第一節 樣本敘述統計………………………………………………… 40 第二節 迴歸式實證結果……………………………………………… 46 第三節 額外分析……………………………………………………… 60第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………………… 69 第一節 結論…………………………………………………………… 69 第二節 研究限制與建議……………………………………………… 71參考文獻……………………………………………………………………… 73 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 79488 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 58935 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 85792 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 58869 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 111171 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 170475 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 192169 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 340235 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 115621 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 75285 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095353051 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 除權息 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 累積異常報酬 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 稅額扣抵比率 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 股權集中度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Ex-dividend | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Cumulative Abnormal Return | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Imputation Credits | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Ownership Concentration | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 稅額扣抵比率及股權集中度對除權(息)股價之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王玉鳳，1995，臺灣地區股票股利除權行情之研究，國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王雪花，1994，股票股利與股價關聯性之研究，國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李存修，1991，股票股利及現金增資之除權與股價行為：理論與實證，台大管理論叢，2（1）：1-40。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李存修，1994，股票股利除權交易日之稅後超額報酬與比價心理假說之實證，台大管理論叢，5（1）：41-60。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林世銘、陳明進與李存修，2001，兩稅合一前後上市公司除權及除息日股價行為之探討，管理學報，第十八卷，第3期：477-501。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林俊成，2001，兩稅合一制在股票除權(息)時對投資人行為的影響，輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林德威，2000，兩稅合一制對台灣上市(櫃)股票除權除息行為影響之實證研究，國立臺灣大學財務金融學研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 柯治宏，2001，電子業在兩稅合一前後除權（息）日異常報酬之研究，國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 范瀛文，1998，台灣上市公司於除權日的異常報酬之研究，輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 孫克難，1997，兩稅合一硏討會實錄，臺北市 : 中華經濟硏究院。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 馬孝璿，1999，兩稅合一對上市、上櫃公司股利政策影響之探討，中山大學財務管理所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 崔惠雯，1999，兩稅合一前股票除權行為之研究，國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 戚務君、俞洪昭、許崇源與曹美娟，2001，兩稅合一制度下股東可扣抵稅額揭露之價值攸關性，會計評論，第33期（7月）：77-99。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳怡文，1990，台灣地區上市股票填息現象之研究－租稅效應與顧客效應之實證，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳明進與陳奕任，2001，兩稅合一股東稅額扣額比率對股票除息及除權之影響，財稅研究，第三十三卷，第4期：28-45。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳奕任，2000，兩稅合一股東可扣抵稅額比率對投資人除息及除權決策之影響，中國文化大學會計研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳昭銘，1994，除息（權）日前後股票市場之交易行為，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃士青，1996，除息(權)日之股價行為與套利機會，國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 楊世芳，1988，除息(權)日股價行為－台灣股票市場之實證研究，國立台灣科技大學工程技術研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 謝宗良，1992，股權分散、公司規模、股票週轉率對股價波動性影響之研究，國立中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ang , James S., David W. Blackwell and William L. Megginson. 1997. The effect of taxes on relative valuation of dividends and capital gains：Evidence from dual-class British investment trusts. Journal of Finance 66: 383-399. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Booth, L. D. and D. J. Johnston. 1984. The ex-dividend behavior of Canadian stock price: Tax change and clientele effects. Journal of Finance 39: 457-476. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Campbell, James A., and William Beranek. 1955. Stock price behavior of ex-dividend date. Journal of Finance 5: 425-429. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Casey, K. Mike, Dwight C. Anderson, Hani I. Mesak, Ross N. Dickens. 1999. Examining the impact of the 1986 tax reform act on corporate dividend policy：A new methodology. The Financial Review 34: 33-46. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Eades, Kenneth M., Hess, Patrick J., Kim, E. Han. 1984. On interpreting security returns during the ex-dividend period. Journal of Financial Economics 13: 3-34. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Elton, E. and M. Grunber. 1970. Marginal stockholder tax rates and clientele effect. Review of Economics and Statistic 52: 68-74. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fama, E. 1976. Foundations of Finance. New York: Basic Books. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Frank, M. A. and R. Jagannathan. 1998. Why do stock prices drop by less than the value of the dividend? Evidence from a country without taxes. Journal of Financial Economics 47: 161-188. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kato, K. and U Loewenstein. 1995. The ex-dividend-day behavior of stock prices: The case of Japan. The Review of Financial Studies 8: 817-847 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kalay, A. 1982. The ex-dividend day behavior of stock prices: A re-examination of the clientele effect. Journal of Finance 37 (4): 1059-1070. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Karpoff, Jonathan M. and Ralph A. Walkling. 1988. Short-term trading around ex-dividend days : Additional evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 21: 291-298. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lakonishok, J. and T. Vermaelen. 1983. Tax reform and ex-dividend day behavior. Journal of Finance 38: 1157-1179. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lakonishok, J. and Vermaelen, T. 1986. Tax-induced trading around ex-dividend days. Journal of Financial Economics 16: 287-319. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lasfer, M. A. 1995. Ex-day behavior: Tax or short-term trading effects. The Journal of Finance 45: 221-229. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Linda Smith Bamber. 1987. Unexpected earnings, firm Size, and trading volume around quarterly earnings announcements. The Accounting Review 62(3): 510-532. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Michaely, R. and Jean-Luc Vila. 1995. Investors’ heterogeneity, price and volume around the ex-dividend day. Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis 30: 171-198. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Michaely, R. 1991. Ex-dividend day stock price behavior：The case of the 1986 tax reform act. Journal of Finance 46: 845-859. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Michaely, R., and M. Murgia. 1995. The effect of tax heterogeneity on prices and volume around the ex-dividend day: Evidence from the Milan stock exchange. The Review of Financial Studies 8: 369-399. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Poterba, J. M., and Lawrence H. Summers. 1984. New evidence that taxes affect the valuation of dividends. Journal of Finance 34: 1397-1415. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Santerre, R. E., and S. P. Neun. 1986. Stock dispersion and executive compensation. The Review of Economics and Statistics 68: 685-687. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Siddiqi, Mazhar A. 1997. Ex-davidend returns and the tax reform act of 1986. The Financial Review 32: 71-86. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wu, C., and Junming H. 1996. The impact of the 1986 tax reform on ex-dividend day volume and price behavior. National Tax Journal 49: 177-192. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yeh, Y. H. and S. B. Chiu. 1996. Ownership structure, capital structure, and firm value: A study of agency theory on Taiwan stock market. NTU Management Review 7: 57-90. | zh_TW |
