1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 商學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 研發取得策略的績效意涵：理論與證據
Performance Implications of R&D Sourcing Strategy: Theory and Evidence
作者 陳玉麟
貢獻者 吳安妮
Wu,Anne
陳玉麟
關鍵詞 研發取得策略
研發多樣化
專利
取得外部技術的經驗
研發人力資本
不同種類的研發人員
公司績效
交易成本經濟
Supermodularity模型
R&D sourcing strategy
R&D diversity
Patent
Prior experience of external source
R&D human capital
Diverse types of R&D experts
Transaction cost economics
Supermodularity model
日期 2005
上傳時間 18-九月-2009 09:10:28 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究旨在探討研發取得策略，情境因子，研發人力資本，與公司績效之間的關聯性。藉由理論模型的推導與實務訪談研發中心主管來發展假說，進而以混合資料模型(pooled data models)與橫斷面資料模型來進行實證分析。主要結果為：當公司的研發多樣化程度較高，專利權數目較少，公司較可能採取內外部研發並進策略(R&D hybrid strategy)，而非完全內部研發策略(make strategy)。最重要地，過度/低度的外部研發取得(under-/over-external R&D sourcing)對於公司績效有負/正向影響。相較於會計績效，此效果對市場績效的影響尤其顯著。同時，研發取得策略對於公司績效的影響，取決於公司的研發人力資本。相較於採取完全內部研發策略的公司，為了吸收外來的異質技術，採取內外部研發並進策略的公司較可能聘任不同研發種類的研發人員；而如此的研發取得策略與研發人力資本契合將進而改善會計與市場績效。本研究的發現與交易成本理論與supermodular理論一致。如同預期，相較於橫斷面資料模型，本研究的實證分析在混合資料模型較為顯著。
The association between performance and R&D sourcing strategy in relation to contextual variables and R&D human capital is determined by the analytical model coupled with field interviews with directors or managers in R&D centers. Capitalizing on a unique database of the 2001-2003 Taiwan Industry R&D Investment Survey containing more detailed information available on the R&D activities to verify this association, the researcher tests the empirical results by cross-sectional and pooled data models. The findings are that an innovating firm will prefer to implement the R&D hybrid strategy when the higher degrees of R&D diversity and fewer counts of patents are exhibited. Perhaps most importantly, this study shows compelling evidence that over-/under-external R&D sourcing affects negatively/positively a firm’s performance. This effect is more significant in the market-based performance (Tobin’s q and average two-year Tobin’s q) than accounting-based performance (ROS and ROA). Moreover, the associations between R&D sourcing strategy and a firm’s performance are contingent on the use of R&D human capital. Innovative firms with the R&D hybrid/make strategy are more/less prone to employee diverse types of R&D experts to absorb the coming external knowledge, and such alignment between R&D sourcing strategy and R&D human capital thus improves both accounting- and market-based performance. The results are consistent with both transaction cost paradigms that discriminating alignment of transactions with strategy leads to more efficient outcomes, and the supermodularity model that a firm’s performance is a function of coherent alignment between strategy and structural elements of an organization. As predicted, these effects are noticeable and more pronounced in the pooled data model than in the cross-sectional design.
參考文獻 1.Aghion, P., and J. Tirole. 1994. The Management of
Innovation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
November.1185-1209.
2.Aiken, M., S. B. Bacharach, and J. L. French. 1980. The
Organic Organization and Innovation. Sociology. 5 63-82.
3.Allen, T. 1986. Organizational Structure, Information
Technology and R&D Productivity. IEEE. Transactions on
Engineering Management. 33 212-217.
4.Amabile, T. M. 1996. Organizational Learning: Creativity
in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of
Creativity. Boulder. CO: Westview Press.
5.Bajari, P., and S. Tadelis. 2001. Incentives versus
Transaction Costs: A Theory of Procurement Contracts.
RAND Journal of Economics. 32 (3) 387-408.
6.Baker, G., and T. Hubbard. 2003. Make Versus Buy in
Trucking: Asset Ownership, Job Design, and Information.
American Economic Review. 93 (3) 551-572.
7.Basberg, B. 1987. Patents and the Measurement of
Technological Change: A Survey of the Literature.
Research Policy. 16 131-141.
8.Bayus, B., G. Erickson, and R. Jacobson. 2003. The
Financial Rewards of New Product Introductions in the
Personal Computer Industry. Management Science. 49 (2)
197-210.
9.Becker, B., and B. Gerhart. 1996. The Impact of Human
Capital on Organizational Performance: Progress and
Prospects. Academy of Management Journal. 39 779-801.
10.Belderbos, R., M. Carree, and B. Lokshin. 2004.
Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance. Research Policy. 33
1477-1492.
11.Bessen J. 2003. Patent Thickets: Strategic Patenting of
Complex Technologies. Working Paper.
12.Burns, T., and G. Stalker. 1967. The Management of
Innovation. London: Tavistock.
13.Capon, N., J. Farley, and S. Hoenig. 1990. Determinants
of Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Management
Science. 36 (10) 1143-1159.
14.Cassiman, B., and R. Veugelers. 2002. R&D Cooperation
and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium. 1
American Economic Review. 92 (4) 1196-1184.
15.____________, M. Colombo, P. Garrone, and R. Veugelers.
2005. The Impact of M&A on the R&D Process: An Empirical
Analysis of the Role of Technological- and Market-
Relatedness. Research Policy. 34 195-220.
16._____________, and R. Veugelers. 2006. Complementarity
in the Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D, External
Technology Acquisition, and Cooperation in R&D.
Management Science. 52 (1) 68-83.
17.Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters
in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. MIT Press,
Cambridge MA.
18.Chen, C. J., and S. J. Tsai. 2005. The Effect of
Knowledge Sourcing, Knowledge Management, and Knowledge
Type on the Innovation Performance-An Organizational
Learning Perspective. Sun Yat-Sen Management Review. 13
(2) 389-416.
19.Chen, Y. L., and C. T. Tsai. 2005. The Association
between Technology Development Investment and Production
Efficiency in Taiwan: Using Stochastic Frontier
Approach. Chiao Da Management Review. 25 (2) 211-233.
20.Chiang, C. M, H. N Hsieh, C. H. Su, and Y. T. Cheng.
2002. The Methodology and Sampling for Pilot Study of
Innovation Survey in Taiwan Area. Management Review of
Fu Jen Catholic University. 9 (3) 111-138.
21.Chien, C. C., and C. Horng. 2003. A Study of External
Knowledge Transfer: An Example for Manufacturing
Companies Listed on Taiwan Stock Exchange and Over-the-
Counter Markets. Journal of Management. 20 (5) 929-964.
22.Cho, H., and V. Pucik. 2005. Relationship between
Innovativeness, Quality, Growth, Profitability, and
Market Value. Strategic Management Journal. 26 555-575.
23.Chu, Y., and M. Hsu. 2002. R&D Input Comparison in
Taiwan with Main Economic System. National Policy Forum.
2 (4) 1-10.
24.Coase, R. H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. in idem. The
Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
25.Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1989. Innovation and
Learning: the Two Faces of R&D. The Economic Journal. 99
569-596.
26.____________________________. 1990. Absorptive Capacity:
A New Perspective in Learning and Innovation.
Administrative Science Quarterly. 17 178-184.
27.__________, and S. Klepper. 1996. A Reprise of Size and
R&D. The Economic Journal. 106 July 925-951.
28.__________, R. R. Nelson, and J. P. Walsh. 2000.
Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability
Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or
not). NBER Working Paper 7552. Cambridge. MA.
29.Colombo, M., and G. Paola. 1996. Technological
Cooperative Agreements and Firm’s R&D Intensity. A Note
on Causality Relations. Research Policy. 25 (6) 923-932.
30.Cyert, R. M., and J. G. March. 1963. A Behavior Theory
of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs. N. J. Prentice-Hall.
31.Damanpour, F. 1991. Organizational Innovation: A Meta-
Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators.
Academy of Management Journal. 34 (3) 555-590.
32.D’ Aspremont, C., and A. Jacquemin. 1988. Cooperative
and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers.
American Economic Review. 75 (5) 1133-1137.
33.De Bondt, R. 1997. Spillovers and Innovative Activities.
International Journal of Industrial Organization. 15 (1)
1-28.
34.Dougherty, D., and C. Hardy. 1996. Sustained Product
Innovation in Large, Mature Organizations: Overcoming
Innovation-to-Organization Problems. Academy of
Management Journal. 39 (5) 1120-1154.
35.Dreyer, B., and K. Grønhaug. 2004. Uncertainty,
Flexibility, and Sustained Competitive Advantage.
Journal of Business Research. 57 (5) 484-494.
36.Dushnitsky, G., and M J. Lenox. 2005. When Do Firms
Undertake R&D By Investing In New Ventures? Strategic
Management Journal. 26 (10) 947-965.
37.Dutta, S., M. Bergen, and J. B. Heide. 1995.
Understanding Dual Distribution: the Case of Reps and
House Accounts. Journal of Law, Economics &
Organization. 11 (1) 189-204.
38.Einhorn, B., M. Kovac, P. Engardio, D. Roberts, F.
Balfour, and C. Edwards. 2005. Why Taiwan Matters.
BusinessWeek Online. May 16.
39.Eisenhardt, K. M., and J. A. Martin. 2000. Dynamic
Capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management
Journal. 21 1105-1121.
40.Ernst, D., and J. Bamford. 2005. Your Alliances Are Too
Stable. Harvard Business Review. June. 133-141.
41.Ernst, H. 2001. Patent Applications and Subsequent
Changes of Performance: Evidence from Time-Series Cross-
Section Analyses on the Firm Level. Research Policy. 30
143-157.
42.Executive Yuan (Taiwan). 2000. Regulations Governing
Application of Tax Credit to Profit-seeking Enterprise
Shareholders of Private Institutions with Respect to R&D
Investments and Elite Training.
43.Executive Yuan (Taiwan). 2000. Regulations of Promoting
the Industry Upgrading.European Commission.
1996. Oslo Manual.1-92.
44.Fang, S. C, J. L. Lin, and C.F. Chiu. 2003. Knowledge
Creation and Technology Transfer Performance of the Firm
Participating in the Consortia: Integrating Social
Capital and Economical Interaction Perspective.
Management Review. 22 (3) 123-148.
45.___________and______. 2005. Organizational Learning,
Social Capital and Technology: An Empirical Study on
Firms Participating in the Consortia. Journal of
Management. 22 (3) 295-315.
46.Galia, F., and, D. Legros. 2004. Complementarities
between Obstacles to Innovation: Evidence from French.
Research Policy. 33 1185-1199.
47.___________________. 2005. Research and Development,
Innovation, Training, Quality and Profitability:
Evidence from French. Working Paper. 1-23.
48._________. 2005. A Creativity Lab for Taiwan.
BusinessWeek Online. May 16.
49.Gallini, N. T. 1984. Deterrence By Market Sharing: A
Strategic Incentive for Licensing. American Economic
Review. 74 (5) 931-941.
50.Geringer, M., S. Tallman, and D. Olsen. 2000. Product
and International Diversification Among Japanese
Multinational Firms. Strategic Management Journal. 21
(5) 51-80.
51.Geroski, P., S. Machin, and J. Van Reenen. 1993.The
Profitability of Innovating Firms? RAND Journal of
Economics. 24 (2) 198-201.
52.Giannakas, K. 2002. Infringement of Intellectual
Property Rights: Causes and Consequences. Amer. J. Agr.
Econ. 84. May 482-494.
53.Gottfredson, M., R. Puryear, and S. Phillips. 2005.
Strategic Sourcing: From Periphery to the Core. Harvard
Business Review. February. 132-139.
54.Gourieroux , C., A. Montfort, E. E. Renault, and A.
Trognon. 1987. Generalized Residuals. Journal of
Econometrics. 35 143-159.
55.Green, W. H. 1997. Econometric Analysis. Third Edition.
New York: Macmillian Publishing.
56.Grindley, P. C., and D. J. Teece. 1997. Managing
Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in
Semiconductors and Electronics. California Management
Review. 39 (2) 1-34.
57.Grinstein, A., and A. Goldman. 2006. Characterizing the
Technology Firm: An Exploratory Study. Research Policy.
35 121-143.
58.Gulati., R. 1995. Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The
Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in
Alliances. Academy of Management Journal. 38 85-112.
59.________. 1998. Alliances and Networks. Strategic
Management Journal. 19 293-317.
60.________. P. R. Lawrence, and P. Puranam. 2005.
Adaptation in Vertical Relationships. Strategic
Management Journal. 26 (5) 415-441.
61.Haksever, C., R. G. Murdick, B. Render, and R. S.
Russell, 1990. Service Management and Operations (second
edition). Prentice-Hall, Inc. 217-226.
62.Hall, B. H. 1999. Innovation and Market Value. NBER
Working Paper 6984, National Bureau of Economic
Research, Cambridge (Mass.).
63.________, and R. H. Ziedonis. 2001. The Patent Paradox
Revisited: An empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S.
Semiconductor Industry. RAND Journal of Economics. 32
(1) 101-128.
64.________., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2005. Market
Value and Patent Citation. RAND Journal of Economics. 36
(1) 16-38.
65.Hamel, G. 1991. Competition for Competence and Inter-
Partner Learning within International Strategic
Alliances. Strategic Management Journal. 12 83-103.
66.Hamm, S. 2005. Does R&D spending deliver results.
BusinessWeek Online. October 11.
67.Heide, J. B. 2003. Plural Governance in Industrial
Purchasing. Journal of Marketing. 67 (4) 18-29.
68.Henderson, R., and I. Cockburn. 1996. Scale, Scope, and
Spillovers: the Determinants of Research Productivity in
Drug Discovery? RAND Journal of Economics. 27 (1) 32-59.
69.Hernan, R. P. L. , and G.. Siotis. 2003. An Empirical
Evaluation of the Determinants of Research Joint Venture
Formation. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 51 75-89.
70.Himmelberg, C., and B. Peterson. 1994. R&D and Internal
Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-tech
Industries. Review of Economics and Statistics. 76 38-
51.
71.Huang, C. M., S. C. Fang, and W. C. Chen. 2000. The
Research of Factors Influencing Organizational
Technology Innovation Performance. Proceedings of the
National Conference on Management of Technology.
72.Huang, J. C. 2003. Human Capital Investment System,
Innovation Strategy and Organizational Performance: A
Test of Alternative Forms of Fit. Management Review. 22
(1) 99-126.
73.Huang, S. C. 2002. The Co-Evolution of Technologies and
Institutions: A Comparison of Taiwanese Hard Disk Drive
and Liquid Crystal Display Industries. R&D Management.
32 (3) 179-190.
74.Ittner, C., W. Lanen, and D. Larcker. 2002. The
Association between Activity-Based Costing and
Manufacturing Performance. Journal of Accounting
Research. 40 711-726.
75.________, D. Lacker, and R. Taylor. 2003. Performance
Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement in
Financial Services Firms. Accounting, Organizations and
Society. 28 715-741.
76.Jacobides, M., and S. Billinger. 2005. Designing the
Boundaries of the Firm: from ‘‘Make, Buy or Ally’’ to
the Dynamic Benefits of Vertical Architecture. Working
Paper. 1-47.
77.Jensen, M. 1986. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow,
Corporate Finance and Takeovers. American Economic
Review. 76 323-29.
78.Joseph, K., and M. Kalwani. 1998. The Role of Bonus Pay
in Sales Force Compensation Plans. Industrial Marketing
Management. 27 147-159.
79.Joskow, P. 1991. The Role of Transaction Cost Economics
in Antitrust and Public Utility Regulatory Policies. The
Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization. 7 53-83.
80.Jung, S., and K. Y. Imm. 2002. The Patent Activities of
Korea and Taiwan: A Comparative Case Study of Patent
Statistics. World Patent Information. 24 303-311.
81.Kale, P., H. Singh, and H. Perlmutter. 2000. Learning
and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic
Alliances: Building Relational Capital. Strategic
Management Journal. 21 (3) 217-237.
82.Kamien, M., and Z. Israel. 2000. Meet Me Halfway:
Research Joint Ventures and Absorptive Capacity.
International Journal of Industrial Organization. 18 (7)
995-1012.
83.Kanter, R. 1983. The Changemasters. New York: Simon &
Schuster.
84.Kennedy, P. 1992. A Guide to Econometrics. Cambridge.
MA: MIT Press.
85.Kim, W. R. 2005. Outsourcing Becomes More Complex.
Information System Management. 22 (2) 89-90.
86.Kimberly, J., and Evanisko, M. 1981. Organizational
Innovation: the Influence of Individual, Organizational
and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of
Technological and Administrative Innovations. Academy of
Management Journal. 24 689-713.
87.Klein, P. G. 2004. The Make-or-Buy Decision: Lessons
from Empirical Studies. Working Paper.
http://ssrn.com/abstract=529962.
88.Klette, T. J. 1996. R&D, Scope Economics, and Plant
Performance. RAND Journal of Economics. 27 (3) 502-522.
89.Lai, S. B., and S. P. Chen. 1998. The Study of R&D
Resources and R&D Portfolio: An Empirical Study for
Taiwan Pharmaceutical Industry. Management Review. 17
(1) 1-20.
90.Lang, L. H., and R. Litzenberger. 1989. Dividend A
Innouncements: Cash Flow Signalling vs. Cash Free
Hypothesis. Journal of Financial Economics. 181-191.
91.Lanjouw, J. O., and M. Schankerman. 2004. Protecting
Intellectual Property Rights: Are Small Firms
Handicapped? Journal of Law and Economics. 42 45-74.
92.Lee, W. R., W. C. Chao, and M. C. Wu. 2000. Partner
Selection Determinants and Alliance Performance: An
Empirical Study of Taiwan’s Information Firms.
Management Review. 19 (3) 1-24.
93.Lev, B., and T. Sougiannis, 1996. The Capitalization,
Amortization and Value-Relevance of R&D. Journal of
Accounting and Economics. 21 107-138.
94.Liebeskind, J. P. 1996. Knowledge, Strategy, and the
Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal. 17 93-
107.
95.Lin, S. 2002. Experience of Industrial Technology R&D
and Innovation Performance in Taiwan. Technology
Pioneer. 86 12-16.
96.Lucas, R. E. 1993. Making a Miracle. Econometrica. 61
251-272.
97.Makadok., R. 2003. Doing the Right Thing and Knowing the
Right Thing to Do: Why the Whole is Greater Than the Sum
of the Parts. Strategic Management Journal. 24 1043-
1055.
98.Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1990a. The Economics of
Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy and
Organization. American Economic Review. 80 511-528.
99._____________________. 1990b. Rationalizability,
Learning and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic
Complementarities. Econometrica. 58 1255-1278.
100._____________________. 1995. Complementarities and Fit
Strategy, Structure, and Organizational Change in
Manufacturing. American Economic Review. 19 179-208.
101.Miravete, E., and J. Pernis. 2006. Innovation
Complementarity and Scale of Production . The Journal of
Industrial Economics. 54 1-29.
102.Mishina. Y., T. G. Pollock, and J. F. Porac. 2004. Are
More Resources Always Better For Growth? Resource
Stickiness in Market and Product Expansion. Strategic
Management Journal. 25 1179-1197.
103.Mol, M. 2005. Does being R&D Intensive Still Discourage
Outsourcing? Evidence from Dutch Manufacturing. Research
Policy. 34 571-582.
104.Morton, K., E. , and I. Zang. 1992. Research Joint
Ventures and R&D Cartels. American Economic Review. 82
(5) 1293-1306.
105.Mowery, D., and C. Oxley. 1995. Inward Technology
Transfer and Competitiveness: The Role of National
Innovation Systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 19
67-93.
106.Nahm, J. 2004. Open Architecture and R&D Incentives.
The Journal of Industrial Economics. 52 (4) 547-568.
107.Nelson, R. R., and S. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary
Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA [etc.] Belknap
Press of Harvard University Press.
108.Nohria, N. 2005. Feed R&D - or Farm It Out? Harvard
Business Review. July-Aug. 17-28.
109.Oxley, J. E. 1997. Appropriability Hazards and
Governance in Strategic Alliances: A Transaction Cost
Approach. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization.
13 (2) 387-409.
110._________. 1999. Institutional Environment and the
Mechanisms of Governance: the Impact of Intellectual
Property Protection on the Structure of Inter-Firm
Alliances. Journal of Economic Behavior and
Organization. 38 (3) 283-309.
111._________., and R. C. Sampson. 2004. The Scope and
Governance of International R&D Alliances. Strategic
Management Journal. 25 (8/9) 723-750.
112.Panzar, J. C., and R. D. Willig. 1981. Economies of
Scope. American Economic Review. 71 268-272.
113.Parmigiani, A. 2004. Why Do Firms Both Make and Buy? An
Investigation on Concurrent Sourcing. Working Paper. 1-
45.
114.Penrose, E. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm.
Oxford University Press: Oxford.
115.Pisano, G. P. 1989. Using Equity Participation to
Support Exchange: Evidence from the Biotechnology
Industry. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization.
5 (1) 109-126.
116.__________. 1990. The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An
Empirical Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35
(1) 153-176.
117.Poppo, L., and T. Zenger. 1998. Testing Alternative
Theories of the Firm: Transaction Cost, Knowledge-based,
and Measurement Explanations for Make-or-Buy Decisions
in Informantion Services. Strategic Management Journal.
19 (9) 853-877.
118.Qian, G., and L. Lee. 2003. Profitability of Small-and
Medium-Sized Enterprises in High-Tech Industries: the
Case of the Biotechnology Industry. Strategic Management
Journal. 24 881-887.
119.Rosenkopf, L., and A. Nerkar. 2001. Beyond Local
Search: Boundary Spanning, Exploration, and Impact in
the Optical Disc Industry. Strategic Management Journal.
22 (3) 287-306.
120.Rouvinen. P. 2002. Characteristics of Product and
Process Innovators: Some Evidence from the Frinnish
Innovation Survey. Applied Economics Letters. 9 575-580.
121.Sampson, R. C. 2004. The Cost of Misaligned Governance
in R&D Alliances. The Journal of Law, Economics, &
Organization. 20 (2) 484-526.
122.Schmookler, J. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth.
Harvard University Press.
123.Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and
Democracy. New York. Harper and Brothers.
124.Shelanski, H. A., and P. G.. Klein. 1995. Empirical
Research in Transaction Cost Economics: A Review and
Assessment. The Journal of Law, Economics, &
Organization. 335-361.
125.Siggelkow, N. 2002. Misperceiving Interactions among
Complements and Substitutes: Organizational
Consequences. Management Science. 48 (7) 900-916.
124.Singh, J. V. 1986. Performance, Slack and Risk-Taking
in Organizational Decision Making. Academy of Management
Journal. 29 562-585.
125.Sinha, D. K., and M. A. Cusumano. 1991. Complementary
Resources and Cooperative Research: A Model of Research
Joint Ventures among Competitors. Management Science. 37
(9) 1091-1106.
126.Smith, K. G., C. J. Collins, and K. D. Clark. 2005.
Existing Knowledge, Knowledge Creation Capability, and
the Rate of New Product Introduction in High-Technology
Firms. Academy of Management Journal. 48 (2) 346-357.
127.Steensma, H. K., and K. G. Corley. 2000. On the
Performance of Technology-Sourcing Partnerships: the
Interaction between Partner Interdependence and
Technology Attributes. Academy of Management Journal. 43
(5) 1045-1067.
128.Stokey, N. L. 1988. Learning by Doing and the
Introduction of New Goods. Journal of Political Economy.
96 701-711.
129.Tadelis, S. 2002. Complexity, Flexibility and the Make-
or-Buy Decision. American Economic Review 92 (2) 433-437.
130.Taylor, R., and K. Ulrich. 2001. Product Variety,
Supply Chain Structure, and Firm Performance: Analysis
of the U.S. Bicycle Industry. Management Science. 47
(12) 1588-1604.
131.Topkis, D. M. 1978. Minimizing a Submodular Function on
a Lattice. Operations Research. 26. 305-321.
132.Tratjenbreg, M. 1990. A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent
Citations and the Value of Innovations. RAND Journal of
Economics. 21 172-187.
133.Tsai, K. 2004. The Impact of Technological Capability
on Firm Performance in Taiwan’s Electronics Industry.
Journal of High Technology Management Research. 15 183-
195.
134.Tsai, M. T., Y. S. Liao, and Y. T. Lin. 2000. A Study
of Technology Acquiring Strategy in High-Technology
Industries. Chinese Management Review. 3 (2) 1-15.
135.Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge Transfer in Intra-
organizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and
Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and
Performance. Academy of Management Journal. 44 (5) 996-
1004.
136.Ulrich, K. T., and D. J. Ellison. 2005. Beyond Make-
Buy: Internalization and Integration of Design and
Production. Production and Operations Management. 14 (3)
315-330.
137.Vanhaverbeke, W., G. Duysters, and N. Noorderhaven.
2002. External Technology Sourcing Through Alliances or
Acquisitions: Analysis of the Application-Specific
Integrated Circuits Industry. Organization Science. 13
(6) 714-733.
138.Vassolo, R., J. Anand, and T. Folta. 2004. Non-
Additivity in Portfolios of Exploration Activities: A
Real Options-Based Analysis of Equity Alliances in
Biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal. 25 1045-
1061.
139.Veugelers, R. 1997. Internal R&D Expenditures and
External Technology Sourcing. Research Policy. 26 (3)
303-315.
140.___________., and B. Cassiman. 1999. Make and Buy in
Innovation Strategies: Evidence from Belgian
Manufacturing Firms. Research Policy. 28 63-80.
141.Walker, B., and D. Weber. 1984. A Transaction Cost
Approach to Make-or-Buy Decisions. Administrative
Science Quarterly. 29 373-391.
142.Westney, E. D. 1988. Domestic and Foreign Learning
Curves in Managing International Cooperative Strategies.
In F. J. Contractor and P. Lorange (Eds.) Cooperative
Strategies in International Business. 339-346. Lexington
MA: Lexington Books.
143.Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies:
Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York. Free
Press.
144.______________. 1985. The Economics and Sociology of
Organization: Promoting a Dialogue. In George Farkas and
Paula England. eds., Industries, Firms, and Jobs:
Sociological and Economic Approaches. New York: Plenum
Press.
145.Wright, P. M., and W. R. Boswell. 2002. Desegregating
HRM: A Review and Synthesis of Micro and Macro Human
Capital Research. Journal of Management. 28 247 – 276.
146.Wu, J. Z., and C. F. Chou. 2004. Intellectual Property
Rights Protection and Economic Efficiency. Academia
Economic Papers. 32 (2) 335-361.
147.Wu, R., and H. Y. Lin. 2001. International
Competitiveness of Taiwan`s Industrial R&D and
Innovation. The Conference on Measurng and Evalutaing of
Industrial R&D and Innovation in the Knowledge-Based
Economy. Taipei.
148.Wuang, M. S., and Y. Y. Li. 2003. A Research on
Supplementary Strategy for Technology Gap in the
Technology Innovation Process – A Case Study of
Biotechnology Industry in Taiwan. Journal of Management
and Systems. 10 (4) 441-447.
149.Young, A. 1991. Learning by Doing and the Dynamic
Effects of International Trade. Quarterly Journal of
Economics. 106 369-406.
150.Zahra, S., and G. George. 2002. Absorptive Capacity: A
Review, Re-conceptualization, and Extension. Academy of
Management Review. 27 (2) 185-203.
151.Zhao, H., X. Tong, P. K. Wong, and J. Zhu. 2005. Types
of Technology Sourcing and Innovative Capability: An
Exploratory Study of Singapore Manufacturing Firms. The
Journal of High Technology Management Research. 16 209-
224.
152.Ziedonis, R. 2004. Don’t Fence Me In: Fragmented
Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition
Strategies of Firms. Management Science. 50 (6) 804-820.
153.Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby, and M. B. Brewer. 1998.
Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S.
Biotechnology Enterprises. American Economic Review. 88
290-360.
描述 博士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
90353501
94
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0903535011
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳安妮zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Wu,Anneen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 陳玉麟zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 陳玉麟zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-九月-2009 09:10:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-九月-2009 09:10:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-九月-2009 09:10:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0903535011en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34263-
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 90353501zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在探討研發取得策略，情境因子，研發人力資本，與公司績效之間的關聯性。藉由理論模型的推導與實務訪談研發中心主管來發展假說，進而以混合資料模型(pooled data models)與橫斷面資料模型來進行實證分析。主要結果為：當公司的研發多樣化程度較高，專利權數目較少，公司較可能採取內外部研發並進策略(R&D hybrid strategy)，而非完全內部研發策略(make strategy)。最重要地，過度/低度的外部研發取得(under-/over-external R&D sourcing)對於公司績效有負/正向影響。相較於會計績效，此效果對市場績效的影響尤其顯著。同時，研發取得策略對於公司績效的影響，取決於公司的研發人力資本。相較於採取完全內部研發策略的公司，為了吸收外來的異質技術，採取內外部研發並進策略的公司較可能聘任不同研發種類的研發人員；而如此的研發取得策略與研發人力資本契合將進而改善會計與市場績效。本研究的發現與交易成本理論與supermodular理論一致。如同預期，相較於橫斷面資料模型，本研究的實證分析在混合資料模型較為顯著。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The association between performance and R&D sourcing strategy in relation to contextual variables and R&D human capital is determined by the analytical model coupled with field interviews with directors or managers in R&D centers. Capitalizing on a unique database of the 2001-2003 Taiwan Industry R&D Investment Survey containing more detailed information available on the R&D activities to verify this association, the researcher tests the empirical results by cross-sectional and pooled data models. The findings are that an innovating firm will prefer to implement the R&D hybrid strategy when the higher degrees of R&D diversity and fewer counts of patents are exhibited. Perhaps most importantly, this study shows compelling evidence that over-/under-external R&D sourcing affects negatively/positively a firm’s performance. This effect is more significant in the market-based performance (Tobin’s q and average two-year Tobin’s q) than accounting-based performance (ROS and ROA). Moreover, the associations between R&D sourcing strategy and a firm’s performance are contingent on the use of R&D human capital. Innovative firms with the R&D hybrid/make strategy are more/less prone to employee diverse types of R&D experts to absorb the coming external knowledge, and such alignment between R&D sourcing strategy and R&D human capital thus improves both accounting- and market-based performance. The results are consistent with both transaction cost paradigms that discriminating alignment of transactions with strategy leads to more efficient outcomes, and the supermodularity model that a firm’s performance is a function of coherent alignment between strategy and structural elements of an organization. As predicted, these effects are noticeable and more pronounced in the pooled data model than in the cross-sectional design.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Chapter 1 Introduction ----------------------------------1
1.1 Research Background and Motivation -----------1
1.2 Taiwan’s Innovation Environment -------------4
1.3 Research Purpose and Question -----------------6
1.4 Research Design--------------------------------9
1.5 Basic Definitions of R&D----------------------10
1.6 Research Contributions------------------------14
1.6.1 Contributions to Academia----------------14
1.6.2 Contributions to Practitioners and
Regulators-------------------------------17

Chapter 2 Literature Review ----------------------------21
2.1 The Determinations of R&D Sourcing Strategy---22
2.1.1 Research Extension ----------------------45
2.2 The Impact of R&D Sourcing Strategy on R&D Human
Capital---------------------------------------50
2.2.1 Research Extension -------------------59
2.3 The Impact of the R&D Sourcing Strategy on Firm
Performance ----------------------------------63
2.3.1 Research Extension -------------------69

2.4 The Impact of the Alignment between R&D Sourcing
Strategy and R&D Human Capital on Firm
Performance-----------------------------------73
2.4.1 Research Extension -------------------79

Chapter 3 Theoretical Model and Hypotheses Development--83
3.1 Model Description ----------------------------83
3.1.1 R&D Sourcing Strategy--------------------88
3.1.2 Derivation of the Equilibrium -----------89
3.1.2.1 Non Arrangement Is Offered ------------89
3.1.2.2 A Contractual Arrangement for Incumbent’s
Technology Is Offered------------------92
3.2 Hypothesis Development ----------------------96

Chapter 4 Research Design -----------------------------108
4.1 Field Interviews ---------------------------108
4.2 Data and Sample Selection ------------------109
4.3 Measures -----------------------------------111
4.4 Econometric Model---------------------------123
4.4.1 The Determinants of R&D Sourcing Strategy123
4.4.2 The Impact of R&D Sourcing Strategy on R&D
Human Capital----------------------------129
4.4.3 The Impact of R&D Sourcing Strategy on
Firm Performance-------------------------131
4.4.4 The Impact of the Alignment between R&D
Sourcing Strategy and R&D Human Capital on
Firm Performance ------------------------134

Chapter 5 Empirical Results ---------------------------138
5.1 The Empirical Results of the Determinants of
R&DSourcing Strategy------------------------142
5.2 The Empirical Results of the Impact of R&D
Sourcing Strategy on R&D Human Capital----145
5.3 The Empirical Results of the Impact of R&D
Sourcing Strategy on Firm Performance-------147
5.4 The Empirical Results of the Alignment between
R&D Sourcing Strategy and R&D Human Capital on
Firm Performance ---------------------------153
5.5 Additional analyses ------------------------160


Chapter 6 Conclusions and Suggestions -----------------164
6.1 Conclusions ---------------------------------164
6.2 Implications --------------------------------166
6.3 Limitations ---------------------------------168
6.4 Suggestions ---------------------------------170

REFERENCE ---------------------------------------------173
Appendix Proofs of Corollaries and Hypotheses -------184
Appendix A Remarks—Risk Aversion --------------------192
Appendix B Sample Selection Issue ------------------- 194		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 14958 bytes-
dc.format.extent 14964 bytes-
dc.format.extent 16997 bytes-
dc.format.extent 63567 bytes-
dc.format.extent 22738 bytes-
dc.format.extent 18546 bytes-
dc.format.extent 80153 bytes-
dc.format.extent 246927 bytes-
dc.format.extent 144870 bytes-
dc.format.extent 176663 bytes-
dc.format.extent 117267 bytes-
dc.format.extent 38983 bytes-
dc.format.extent 64561 bytes-
dc.format.extent 103528 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0903535011en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 研發取得策略zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 研發多樣化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 專利zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 取得外部技術的經驗zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 研發人力資本zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 不同種類的研發人員zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公司績效zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 交易成本經濟zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Supermodularity模型zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) R&D sourcing strategyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) R&D diversityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Patenten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Prior experience of external sourceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) R&D human capitalen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Diverse types of R&D expertsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Transaction cost economicsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Supermodularity modelen_US
dc.title (題名) 研發取得策略的績效意涵：理論與證據zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Performance Implications of R&D Sourcing Strategy: Theory and Evidenceen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.Aghion, P., and J. Tirole. 1994. The Management ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Innovation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) November.1185-1209.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.Aiken, M., S. B. Bacharach, and J. L. French. 1980. Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Organic Organization and Innovation. Sociology. 5 63-82.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.Allen, T. 1986. Organizational Structure, Informationzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Technology and R&D Productivity. IEEE. Transactions onzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Engineering Management. 33 212-217.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.Amabile, T. M. 1996. Organizational Learning: Creativityzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) in Context: Update to the Social Psychology ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Creativity. Boulder. CO: Westview Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.Bajari, P., and S. Tadelis. 2001. Incentives versuszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Transaction Costs: A Theory of Procurement Contracts.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) RAND Journal of Economics. 32 (3) 387-408.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.Baker, G., and T. Hubbard. 2003. Make Versus Buy inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Trucking: Asset Ownership, Job Design, and Information.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Economic Review. 93 (3) 551-572.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.Basberg, B. 1987. Patents and the Measurement ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Technological Change: A Survey of the Literature.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Research Policy. 16 131-141.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.Bayus, B., G. Erickson, and R. Jacobson. 2003. Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Financial Rewards of New Product Introductions in thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Personal Computer Industry. Management Science. 49 (2)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 197-210.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.Becker, B., and B. Gerhart. 1996. The Impact of Humanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Capital on Organizational Performance: Progress andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Prospects. Academy of Management Journal. 39 779-801.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.Belderbos, R., M. Carree, and B. Lokshin. 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance. Research Policy. 33zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1477-1492.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.Bessen J. 2003. Patent Thickets: Strategic Patenting ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Complex Technologies. Working Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.Burns, T., and G. Stalker. 1967. The Management ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Innovation. London: Tavistock.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.Capon, N., J. Farley, and S. Hoenig. 1990. Determinantszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) of Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Managementzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Science. 36 (10) 1143-1159.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.Cassiman, B., and R. Veugelers. 2002. R&D Cooperationzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium. 1zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Economic Review. 92 (4) 1196-1184.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.____________, M. Colombo, P. Garrone, and R. Veugelers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2005. The Impact of M&A on the R&D Process: An Empiricalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Analysis of the Role of Technological- and Market-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Relatedness. Research Policy. 34 195-220.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16._____________, and R. Veugelers. 2006. Complementarityzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) in the Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D, Externalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Technology Acquisition, and Cooperation in R&D.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Management Science. 52 (1) 68-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapterszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. MIT Press,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cambridge MA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18.Chen, C. J., and S. J. Tsai. 2005. The Effect ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Knowledge Sourcing, Knowledge Management, and Knowledgezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Type on the Innovation Performance-An Organizationalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Learning Perspective. Sun Yat-Sen Management Review. 13zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (2) 389-416.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19.Chen, Y. L., and C. T. Tsai. 2005. The Associationzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) between Technology Development Investment and Productionzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Efficiency in Taiwan: Using Stochastic Frontierzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Approach. Chiao Da Management Review. 25 (2) 211-233.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20.Chiang, C. M, H. N Hsieh, C. H. Su, and Y. T. Cheng.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2002. The Methodology and Sampling for Pilot Study ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Innovation Survey in Taiwan Area. Management Review ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fu Jen Catholic University. 9 (3) 111-138.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21.Chien, C. C., and C. Horng. 2003. A Study of Externalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Knowledge Transfer: An Example for Manufacturingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Companies Listed on Taiwan Stock Exchange and Over-the-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Counter Markets. Journal of Management. 20 (5) 929-964.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22.Cho, H., and V. Pucik. 2005. Relationship betweenzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Innovativeness, Quality, Growth, Profitability, andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Market Value. Strategic Management Journal. 26 555-575.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23.Chu, Y., and M. Hsu. 2002. R&D Input Comparison inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Taiwan with Main Economic System. National Policy Forum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2 (4) 1-10.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24.Coase, R. H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. in idem. Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago: University ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25.Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1989. Innovation andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Learning: the Two Faces of R&D. The Economic Journal. 99zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 569-596.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26.____________________________. 1990. Absorptive Capacity:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) A New Perspective in Learning and Innovation.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Administrative Science Quarterly. 17 178-184.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27.__________, and S. Klepper. 1996. A Reprise of Size andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) R&D. The Economic Journal. 106 July 925-951.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28.__________, R. R. Nelson, and J. P. Walsh. 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriabilityzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (orzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) not). NBER Working Paper 7552. Cambridge. MA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 29.Colombo, M., and G. Paola. 1996. Technologicalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cooperative Agreements and Firm’s R&D Intensity. A Notezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) on Causality Relations. Research Policy. 25 (6) 923-932.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 30.Cyert, R. M., and J. G. March. 1963. A Behavior Theoryzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs. N. J. Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 31.Damanpour, F. 1991. Organizational Innovation: A Meta-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Academy of Management Journal. 34 (3) 555-590.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 32.D’ Aspremont, C., and A. Jacquemin. 1988. Cooperativezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Economic Review. 75 (5) 1133-1137.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 33.De Bondt, R. 1997. Spillovers and Innovative Activities.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) International Journal of Industrial Organization. 15 (1)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 34.Dougherty, D., and C. Hardy. 1996. Sustained Productzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Innovation in Large, Mature Organizations: Overcomingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Innovation-to-Organization Problems. Academy ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Management Journal. 39 (5) 1120-1154.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 35.Dreyer, B., and K. Grønhaug. 2004. Uncertainty,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Flexibility, and Sustained Competitive Advantage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal of Business Research. 57 (5) 484-494.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 36.Dushnitsky, G., and M J. Lenox. 2005. When Do Firmszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Undertake R&D By Investing In New Ventures? Strategiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Management Journal. 26 (10) 947-965.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 37.Dutta, S., M. Bergen, and J. B. Heide. 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Understanding Dual Distribution: the Case of Reps andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) House Accounts. Journal of Law, Economics &zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Organization. 11 (1) 189-204.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 38.Einhorn, B., M. Kovac, P. Engardio, D. Roberts, F.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Balfour, and C. Edwards. 2005. Why Taiwan Matters.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) BusinessWeek Online. May 16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 39.Eisenhardt, K. M., and J. A. Martin. 2000. Dynamiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Capabilities: What are they? Strategic Managementzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal. 21 1105-1121.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 40.Ernst, D., and J. Bamford. 2005. Your Alliances Are Toozh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stable. Harvard Business Review. June. 133-141.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 41.Ernst, H. 2001. Patent Applications and Subsequentzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Changes of Performance: Evidence from Time-Series Cross-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Section Analyses on the Firm Level. Research Policy. 30zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 143-157.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 42.Executive Yuan (Taiwan). 2000. Regulations Governingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Application of Tax Credit to Profit-seeking Enterprisezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shareholders of Private Institutions with Respect to R&Dzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Investments and Elite Training.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 43.Executive Yuan (Taiwan). 2000. Regulations of Promotingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) the Industry Upgrading.European Commission.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1996. Oslo Manual.1-92.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 44.Fang, S. C, J. L. Lin, and C.F. Chiu. 2003. Knowledgezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Creation and Technology Transfer Performance of the Firmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Participating in the Consortia: Integrating Socialzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Capital and Economical Interaction Perspective.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Management Review. 22 (3) 123-148.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 45.___________and______. 2005. Organizational Learning,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Social Capital and Technology: An Empirical Study onzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Firms Participating in the Consortia. Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Management. 22 (3) 295-315.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 46.Galia, F., and, D. Legros. 2004. Complementaritieszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) between Obstacles to Innovation: Evidence from French.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Research Policy. 33 1185-1199.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 47.___________________. 2005. Research and Development,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Innovation, Training, Quality and Profitability:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Evidence from French. Working Paper. 1-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 48._________. 2005. A Creativity Lab for Taiwan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) BusinessWeek Online. May 16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 49.Gallini, N. T. 1984. Deterrence By Market Sharing: Azh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Strategic Incentive for Licensing. American Economiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Review. 74 (5) 931-941.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 50.Geringer, M., S. Tallman, and D. Olsen. 2000. Productzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and International Diversification Among Japanesezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Multinational Firms. Strategic Management Journal. 21zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (5) 51-80.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 51.Geroski, P., S. Machin, and J. Van Reenen. 1993.Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Profitability of Innovating Firms? RAND Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economics. 24 (2) 198-201.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 52.Giannakas, K. 2002. Infringement of Intellectualzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Property Rights: Causes and Consequences. Amer. J. Agr.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Econ. 84. May 482-494.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 53.Gottfredson, M., R. Puryear, and S. Phillips. 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Strategic Sourcing: From Periphery to the Core. Harvardzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Business Review. February. 132-139.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 54.Gourieroux , C., A. Montfort, E. E. Renault, and A.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Trognon. 1987. Generalized Residuals. Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Econometrics. 35 143-159.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 55.Green, W. H. 1997. Econometric Analysis. Third Edition.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) New York: Macmillian Publishing.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 56.Grindley, P. C., and D. J. Teece. 1997. Managingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Semiconductors and Electronics. California Managementzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Review. 39 (2) 1-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 57.Grinstein, A., and A. Goldman. 2006. Characterizing thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Technology Firm: An Exploratory Study. Research Policy.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 35 121-143.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 58.Gulati., R. 1995. Does Familiarity Breed Trust? Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alliances. Academy of Management Journal. 38 85-112.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 59.________. 1998. Alliances and Networks. Strategiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Management Journal. 19 293-317.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 60.________. P. R. Lawrence, and P. Puranam. 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Adaptation in Vertical Relationships. Strategiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Management Journal. 26 (5) 415-441.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 61.Haksever, C., R. G. Murdick, B. Render, and R. S.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Russell, 1990. Service Management and Operations (secondzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) edition). Prentice-Hall, Inc. 217-226.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 62.Hall, B. H. 1999. Innovation and Market Value. NBERzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Working Paper 6984, National Bureau of Economiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Research, Cambridge (Mass.).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 63.________, and R. H. Ziedonis. 2001. The Patent Paradoxzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Revisited: An empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Semiconductor Industry. RAND Journal of Economics. 32zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (1) 101-128.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 64.________., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2005. Marketzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Value and Patent Citation. RAND Journal of Economics. 36zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (1) 16-38.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 65.Hamel, G. 1991. Competition for Competence and Inter-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Partner Learning within International Strategiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alliances. Strategic Management Journal. 12 83-103.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 66.Hamm, S. 2005. Does R&D spending deliver results.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) BusinessWeek Online. October 11.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 67.Heide, J. B. 2003. Plural Governance in Industrialzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Purchasing. Journal of Marketing. 67 (4) 18-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 68.Henderson, R., and I. Cockburn. 1996. Scale, Scope, andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Spillovers: the Determinants of Research Productivity inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Drug Discovery? RAND Journal of Economics. 27 (1) 32-59.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 69.Hernan, R. P. L. , and G.. Siotis. 2003. An Empiricalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Evaluation of the Determinants of Research Joint Venturezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Formation. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 51 75-89.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 70.Himmelberg, C., and B. Peterson. 1994. R&D and Internalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-techzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Industries. Review of Economics and Statistics. 76 38-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 51.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 71.Huang, C. M., S. C. Fang, and W. C. Chen. 2000. Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Research of Factors Influencing Organizationalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Technology Innovation Performance. Proceedings of thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) National Conference on Management of Technology.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 72.Huang, J. C. 2003. Human Capital Investment System,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Innovation Strategy and Organizational Performance: Azh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Test of Alternative Forms of Fit. Management Review. 22zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (1) 99-126.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 73.Huang, S. C. 2002. The Co-Evolution of Technologies andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Institutions: A Comparison of Taiwanese Hard Disk Drivezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and Liquid Crystal Display Industries. R&D Management.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 32 (3) 179-190.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 74.Ittner, C., W. Lanen, and D. Larcker. 2002. Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Association between Activity-Based Costing andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Manufacturing Performance. Journal of Accountingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Research. 40 711-726.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 75.________, D. Lacker, and R. Taylor. 2003. Performancezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Financial Services Firms. Accounting, Organizations andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Society. 28 715-741.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 76.Jacobides, M., and S. Billinger. 2005. Designing thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Boundaries of the Firm: from ‘‘Make, Buy or Ally’’ tozh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) the Dynamic Benefits of Vertical Architecture. Workingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paper. 1-47.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 77.Jensen, M. 1986. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Corporate Finance and Takeovers. American Economiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Review. 76 323-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 78.Joseph, K., and M. Kalwani. 1998. The Role of Bonus Payzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) in Sales Force Compensation Plans. Industrial Marketingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Management. 27 147-159.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 79.Joskow, P. 1991. The Role of Transaction Cost Economicszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) in Antitrust and Public Utility Regulatory Policies. Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization. 7 53-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 80.Jung, S., and K. Y. Imm. 2002. The Patent Activities ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Korea and Taiwan: A Comparative Case Study of Patentzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Statistics. World Patent Information. 24 303-311.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 81.Kale, P., H. Singh, and H. Perlmutter. 2000. Learningzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alliances: Building Relational Capital. Strategiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Management Journal. 21 (3) 217-237.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 82.Kamien, M., and Z. Israel. 2000. Meet Me Halfway:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Research Joint Ventures and Absorptive Capacity.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) International Journal of Industrial Organization. 18 (7)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 995-1012.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 83.Kanter, R. 1983. The Changemasters. New York: Simon &zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schuster.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 84.Kennedy, P. 1992. A Guide to Econometrics. Cambridge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) MA: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 85.Kim, W. R. 2005. Outsourcing Becomes More Complex.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Information System Management. 22 (2) 89-90.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 86.Kimberly, J., and Evanisko, M. 1981. Organizationalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Innovation: the Influence of Individual, Organizationalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Technological and Administrative Innovations. Academy ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Management Journal. 24 689-713.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 87.Klein, P. G. 2004. The Make-or-Buy Decision: Lessonszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) from Empirical Studies. Working Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://ssrn.com/abstract=529962.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 88.Klette, T. J. 1996. R&D, Scope Economics, and Plantzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Performance. RAND Journal of Economics. 27 (3) 502-522.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 89.Lai, S. B., and S. P. Chen. 1998. The Study of R&Dzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Resources and R&D Portfolio: An Empirical Study forzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Taiwan Pharmaceutical Industry. Management Review. 17zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (1) 1-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 90.Lang, L. H., and R. Litzenberger. 1989. Dividend Azh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Innouncements: Cash Flow Signalling vs. Cash Freezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hypothesis. Journal of Financial Economics. 181-191.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 91.Lanjouw, J. O., and M. Schankerman. 2004. Protectingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Intellectual Property Rights: Are Small Firmszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Handicapped? Journal of Law and Economics. 42 45-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 92.Lee, W. R., W. C. Chao, and M. C. Wu. 2000. Partnerzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Selection Determinants and Alliance Performance: Anzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Empirical Study of Taiwan’s Information Firms.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Management Review. 19 (3) 1-24.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 93.Lev, B., and T. Sougiannis, 1996. The Capitalization,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Amortization and Value-Relevance of R&D. Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Accounting and Economics. 21 107-138.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 94.Liebeskind, J. P. 1996. Knowledge, Strategy, and thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal. 17 93-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 107.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 95.Lin, S. 2002. Experience of Industrial Technology R&Dzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and Innovation Performance in Taiwan. Technologyzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pioneer. 86 12-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 96.Lucas, R. E. 1993. Making a Miracle. Econometrica. 61zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 251-272.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 97.Makadok., R. 2003. Doing the Right Thing and Knowing thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Right Thing to Do: Why the Whole is Greater Than the Sumzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) of the Parts. Strategic Management Journal. 24 1043-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1055.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 98.Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1990a. The Economics ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Organization. American Economic Review. 80 511-528.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 99._____________________. 1990b. Rationalizability,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Learning and Equilibrium in Games with Strategiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Complementarities. Econometrica. 58 1255-1278.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 100._____________________. 1995. Complementarities and Fitzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Strategy, Structure, and Organizational Change inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Manufacturing. American Economic Review. 19 179-208.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 101.Miravete, E., and J. Pernis. 2006. Innovationzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Complementarity and Scale of Production . The Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Industrial Economics. 54 1-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 102.Mishina. Y., T. G. Pollock, and J. F. Porac. 2004. Arezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) More Resources Always Better For Growth? Resourcezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stickiness in Market and Product Expansion. Strategiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Management Journal. 25 1179-1197.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 103.Mol, M. 2005. Does being R&D Intensive Still Discouragezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Outsourcing? Evidence from Dutch Manufacturing. Researchzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Policy. 34 571-582.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 104.Morton, K., E. , and I. Zang. 1992. Research Jointzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ventures and R&D Cartels. American Economic Review. 82zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (5) 1293-1306.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 105.Mowery, D., and C. Oxley. 1995. Inward Technologyzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Transfer and Competitiveness: The Role of Nationalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Innovation Systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 19zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 67-93.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 106.Nahm, J. 2004. Open Architecture and R&D Incentives.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) The Journal of Industrial Economics. 52 (4) 547-568.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 107.Nelson, R. R., and S. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionaryzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA [etc.] Belknapzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Press of Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 108.Nohria, N. 2005. Feed R&D - or Farm It Out? Harvardzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Business Review. July-Aug. 17-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 109.Oxley, J. E. 1997. Appropriability Hazards andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Governance in Strategic Alliances: A Transaction Costzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Approach. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13 (2) 387-409.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 110._________. 1999. Institutional Environment and thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mechanisms of Governance: the Impact of Intellectualzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Property Protection on the Structure of Inter-Firmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alliances. Journal of Economic Behavior andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Organization. 38 (3) 283-309.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 111._________., and R. C. Sampson. 2004. The Scope andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Governance of International R&D Alliances. Strategiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Management Journal. 25 (8/9) 723-750.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 112.Panzar, J. C., and R. D. Willig. 1981. Economies ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scope. American Economic Review. 71 268-272.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 113.Parmigiani, A. 2004. Why Do Firms Both Make and Buy? Anzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Investigation on Concurrent Sourcing. Working Paper. 1-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 45.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 114.Penrose, E. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oxford University Press: Oxford.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 115.Pisano, G. P. 1989. Using Equity Participation tozh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Support Exchange: Evidence from the Biotechnologyzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Industry. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5 (1) 109-126.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 116.__________. 1990. The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: Anzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Empirical Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (1) 153-176.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 117.Poppo, L., and T. Zenger. 1998. Testing Alternativezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Theories of the Firm: Transaction Cost, Knowledge-based,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and Measurement Explanations for Make-or-Buy Decisionszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) in Informantion Services. Strategic Management Journal.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19 (9) 853-877.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 118.Qian, G., and L. Lee. 2003. Profitability of Small-andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Medium-Sized Enterprises in High-Tech Industries: thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Case of the Biotechnology Industry. Strategic Managementzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal. 24 881-887.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 119.Rosenkopf, L., and A. Nerkar. 2001. Beyond Localzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Search: Boundary Spanning, Exploration, and Impact inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) the Optical Disc Industry. Strategic Management Journal.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22 (3) 287-306.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 120.Rouvinen. P. 2002. Characteristics of Product andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Process Innovators: Some Evidence from the Frinnishzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Innovation Survey. Applied Economics Letters. 9 575-580.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 121.Sampson, R. C. 2004. The Cost of Misaligned Governancezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) in R&D Alliances. The Journal of Law, Economics, &zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Organization. 20 (2) 484-526.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 122.Schmookler, J. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 123.Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Democracy. New York. Harper and Brothers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 124.Shelanski, H. A., and P. G.. Klein. 1995. Empiricalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Research in Transaction Cost Economics: A Review andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Assessment. The Journal of Law, Economics, &zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Organization. 335-361.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 125.Siggelkow, N. 2002. Misperceiving Interactions amongzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Complements and Substitutes: Organizationalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Consequences. Management Science. 48 (7) 900-916.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 124.Singh, J. V. 1986. Performance, Slack and Risk-Takingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) in Organizational Decision Making. Academy of Managementzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal. 29 562-585.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 125.Sinha, D. K., and M. A. Cusumano. 1991. Complementaryzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Resources and Cooperative Research: A Model of Researchzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Joint Ventures among Competitors. Management Science. 37zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (9) 1091-1106.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 126.Smith, K. G., C. J. Collins, and K. D. Clark. 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Existing Knowledge, Knowledge Creation Capability, andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) the Rate of New Product Introduction in High-Technologyzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Firms. Academy of Management Journal. 48 (2) 346-357.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 127.Steensma, H. K., and K. G. Corley. 2000. On thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Performance of Technology-Sourcing Partnerships: thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Interaction between Partner Interdependence andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Technology Attributes. Academy of Management Journal. 43zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (5) 1045-1067.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 128.Stokey, N. L. 1988. Learning by Doing and thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Introduction of New Goods. Journal of Political Economy.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 96 701-711.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 129.Tadelis, S. 2002. Complexity, Flexibility and the Make-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) or-Buy Decision. American Economic Review 92 (2) 433-437.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 130.Taylor, R., and K. Ulrich. 2001. Product Variety,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Supply Chain Structure, and Firm Performance: Analysiszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) of the U.S. Bicycle Industry. Management Science. 47zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (12) 1588-1604.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 131.Topkis, D. M. 1978. Minimizing a Submodular Function onzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) a Lattice. Operations Research. 26. 305-321.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 132.Tratjenbreg, M. 1990. A Penny for Your Quotes: Patentzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Citations and the Value of Innovations. RAND Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economics. 21 172-187.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 133.Tsai, K. 2004. The Impact of Technological Capabilityzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) on Firm Performance in Taiwan’s Electronics Industry.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal of High Technology Management Research. 15 183-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 195.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 134.Tsai, M. T., Y. S. Liao, and Y. T. Lin. 2000. A Studyzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) of Technology Acquiring Strategy in High-Technologyzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Industries. Chinese Management Review. 3 (2) 1-15.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 135.Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge Transfer in Intra-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) organizational Networks: Effects of Network Position andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Performance. Academy of Management Journal. 44 (5) 996-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 136.Ulrich, K. T., and D. J. Ellison. 2005. Beyond Make-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Buy: Internalization and Integration of Design andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Production. Production and Operations Management. 14 (3)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 315-330.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 137.Vanhaverbeke, W., G. Duysters, and N. Noorderhaven.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2002. External Technology Sourcing Through Alliances orzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Acquisitions: Analysis of the Application-Specificzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Integrated Circuits Industry. Organization Science. 13zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (6) 714-733.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 138.Vassolo, R., J. Anand, and T. Folta. 2004. Non-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Additivity in Portfolios of Exploration Activities: Azh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Real Options-Based Analysis of Equity Alliances inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal. 25 1045-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1061.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 139.Veugelers, R. 1997. Internal R&D Expenditures andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) External Technology Sourcing. Research Policy. 26 (3)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 303-315.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 140.___________., and B. Cassiman. 1999. Make and Buy inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Innovation Strategies: Evidence from Belgianzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Manufacturing Firms. Research Policy. 28 63-80.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 141.Walker, B., and D. Weber. 1984. A Transaction Costzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Approach to Make-or-Buy Decisions. Administrativezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Science Quarterly. 29 373-391.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 142.Westney, E. D. 1988. Domestic and Foreign Learningzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Curves in Managing International Cooperative Strategies.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) In F. J. Contractor and P. Lorange (Eds.) Cooperativezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Strategies in International Business. 339-346. Lexingtonzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) MA: Lexington Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 143.Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York. Freezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 144.______________. 1985. The Economics and Sociology ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Organization: Promoting a Dialogue. In George Farkas andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paula England. eds., Industries, Firms, and Jobs:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sociological and Economic Approaches. New York: Plenumzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 145.Wright, P. M., and W. R. Boswell. 2002. Desegregatingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) HRM: A Review and Synthesis of Micro and Macro Humanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Capital Research. Journal of Management. 28 247 – 276.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 146.Wu, J. Z., and C. F. Chou. 2004. Intellectual Propertyzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rights Protection and Economic Efficiency. Academiazh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economic Papers. 32 (2) 335-361.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 147.Wu, R., and H. Y. Lin. 2001. Internationalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Competitiveness of Taiwan`s Industrial R&D andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Innovation. The Conference on Measurng and Evalutaing ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Industrial R&D and Innovation in the Knowledge-Basedzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economy. Taipei.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 148.Wuang, M. S., and Y. Y. Li. 2003. A Research onzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Supplementary Strategy for Technology Gap in thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Technology Innovation Process – A Case Study ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Biotechnology Industry in Taiwan. Journal of Managementzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and Systems. 10 (4) 441-447.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 149.Young, A. 1991. Learning by Doing and the Dynamiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Effects of International Trade. Quarterly Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economics. 106 369-406.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 150.Zahra, S., and G. George. 2002. Absorptive Capacity: Azh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Review, Re-conceptualization, and Extension. Academy ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Management Review. 27 (2) 185-203.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 151.Zhao, H., X. Tong, P. K. Wong, and J. Zhu. 2005. Typeszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) of Technology Sourcing and Innovative Capability: Anzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Exploratory Study of Singapore Manufacturing Firms. Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal of High Technology Management Research. 16 209-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 224.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 152.Ziedonis, R. 2004. Don’t Fence Me In: Fragmentedzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisitionzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Strategies of Firms. Management Science. 50 (6) 804-820.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 153.Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby, and M. B. Brewer. 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Biotechnology Enterprises. American Economic Review. 88zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 290-360.zh_TW