學術產出-學位論文

題名 線上音樂與補償金機制之研究
A Study on the Levy System of Music Distribution in Digital Era
作者 陳慧鄉
Chen, Hui-Hsiang
貢獻者 陳錦烽
Chen, Jiin-Feng
陳慧鄉
Chen, Hui-Hsiang
關鍵詞 點對點檔案交換
線上音樂交換
補償金
peer-to-peer
on-line music distribution
levy
日期 2004
上傳時間 18-九月-2009 09:11:12 (UTC+8)
摘要 網際網路的發達產生許多新的商業模式,線上音樂的興起即是一例,面對紛擾不斷的線上音樂交換,各國因應態度不一,如何兼顧科技發展及保護著作人權益儼然已成重要議題。著作權補償金制度精神在於補償著作權人在利用人合理使用下做遭受經濟上的損失,目前尚無國家對線上音樂交換業者收取補償金,本研究即欲探討補償金之徵收是否能有助於解決線上音樂之爭議、我國著作權法五十條之一修正案是否具可行空間,及線上音樂交換爭議各關係人在補償金制度中能扮演的角色為何。

本研究以次級資料分析之方式,針對補償金、強制授權、概括授權等制度進行探討,並深度訪談施行補償金制度之各關係人意見,研究結果發現補償金制度應用於線上音樂交換確有其空間,亦可有效彌補著作權人之損失,且有助於線上音樂交換業者與著作權人進行理性之談判。線上音樂交換業者亦可提供其科技能力,協助補償金制度施行,仲介團體雖已有徵收及分配權利金之經驗,但在補償金制度施行前仍應做好妥善之準備,俾使補償金制度有效運作。
There have been great legal debates over the legitimacy of digital music distribution channels such as peer-to-peer file exchange system. Music industries insist that any unauthorized replication of music is illegal, whereas service providers thinks that technology is neutral and should not bear any responsibilities about the contents transferred through the platform it provides. Courts around the world have different opinions on the issue, and no viable solution has been found as yet.

Levy systems for copyright has been around for several decades, which recognizes the difficulty of authors (or owners) of copyright to enforce it. Levies will be collected for a host of different sources include blank media, recording devices and so on, which means sale of digital devices such and digital music players/recorders, maybe even the Internet access service or personal computers are subjects to levy collection. Government agencies in Europe, Japan and Canada has long been dealing with such issues and have their levy systems well established, which seems to be a viable solution for the digital music debates.

The history of levy system and the implementation in different countries were surveyed in this thesis, and in-depth interviews were conducted to examined the opinions of different parties (regarding the dispute over digital music distribution) by. It is found that a well-designed levy system could ease the tension between music and technology industry, therefore facilitate talks between them in search for a solution based on mutual interests. Another interesting finding is that the attitude toward peer-to-peer service provider is quite different between music industry and musicians. Distinction must be made between music industry and individual musicians if one intend to study the resolution of disputes in digital music distribution.
參考文獻 一、中文部分
王立文,2004,探討P2P對唱片產業之衝擊及問題解決之道,台大商研所碩士論文。
王采瑜,2004,兼具安全與效率之適用於資訊商品數位權利機制,世新大學資管所碩士論文。
李宗德、陳怡秀、許凌殷,1993,因應網路科技發展之著作權法修正方向芻議 – 著作權補償金制度之引進,理慈國際科技法律事務所。
林道燊,2003.10,MP3發展概況,台灣工業銀行。
林祺凱,2003,網際網路安全服務之實務研究,世新大學資管所碩士論文。
林忠賢,2003,以角色基礎之數位權利管理模式之研究,世新大學資管所碩士論文。
林承宗,2002,論網際網路上音樂著作權侵害之研究,中山大學中山學術研究所碩士論文。
社團法人私的錄音補償金管理協會,2004,平成十五年度事業報告書暨決算報告書,社團法人私的錄音補償金管理協會。
洪春暉,2004,由Apple iTunes之成功看線上音樂經營模式的轉變消費,資策會。
高珮芳,2004,線上音樂商店系統架構之競爭分析,政治大學智財所碩士論文。
財團法人國際唱片業交流基金會,2005,國際唱片業看好線上音樂市場-合法授權將是關鍵,http://www.ifpi.org.tw/。
章忠信,1998.3,著作權仲介團體條例簡述,月旦法學第三十四期。
章忠信,2004.11.26,著作權補償金之初探,『網際空間:資安、犯罪與法律社會』學術研究暨實務研討會論文集。
章忠信,2004,公平會不能以警告函解決著作權仲介團體的濫權,http://www.copyrightnote.org/。
張基銘,2003,美國著作權保護制度之研究--以網際網路著作權為中心,淡江大學美研所碩士論文
莊心潔,2001,Peer-to-Peer多媒體傳輸科技著作權問題之研究,東吳大學法研所碩士論文
楊明仁,2003.10,預錄型光碟片市場概況,台灣工業銀行。
葉茂林,2002,資訊法律,書泉出版社。
葉志良,2005.3.28,Copyright or Copywrong-美國P2P檔案分享與著作權的法律戰爭,太穎國際法律事務所。
資策會內容訓練處-資訊市場情報中心,2004.7,數位內容學院市場事件分析-由我國線上音樂商店成立談未來發展契機,經濟部工業局委託。
資策會,2004.8,數位內容學院專題研究報告-線上音樂發展與趨勢分析,經濟部工業局委託。
資策會,2004.9,數位內容學院市場分析-由Kuro與IFPI談我國線上音樂發展,經濟部工業局委託。
資策會,2005,2004電子商務應用年鑑,資策會。
數位典藏國家型科技計畫技術發展組,2005,DRM Demo Site,中央研究院。
希瓦˙維迪亞那桑,2003,著作權保護了誰?,商周出版社。
蔡明誠,2003.6,國際著作權仲介團體制度之研究,經濟部智慧財產局委託專案。
蔡明誠,2001,數位時代著作權法律問題,經濟部智慧財產月刊。
劉靜怡,網路音樂的死路或轉機?-Napster判決的分析與省思,
http://www.ipeclaw.com.tw/argue_case/arguecase_napster_01.shtm
劉尚志、陳佳麟,2001,數位音樂著作權之合理使用與侵權規範,智權情報網,http://www.apipa.org.tw/Article/。
陳柏如,2002,數位時代著作權集體管理之研究,台灣大學法研所碩士論文。
陳榮林,2003,點對點傳輸之著作權侵害問題─以美國法為中心,交通大學科技法律學程碩士論文。
陳月秀,2004,智慧財產權證券化-從美日經驗看我國實施可行性與立法之芻議,政治大學法研所碩士論文。
賴文智,2003,數位著作權法,台北:益思科技法律事務所。
賴文智,數位時代個人利用著作合理使用範圍之再調整,網路資訊第122期,台北:益思科技法律事務所。
賴文智,2002.1,數位科技對著作權制度的衝擊,台北:益思科技法律事務所。
鄭丁旺,2004.8,中級會計學(上),第八版。
鄭立中,2003,網際網路對音樂產業智慧財產權的影響,政治大學智財所碩士論文。
蕭秉國,2003,後Napster時代Peer-to-Peer軟體對網路著作權的影響,智權情報網,http://www.apipa.org.tw/Article/。
二、英文部分
Annemique, M.E. de Kroon. 2000. Protection of Copyright Management Information , Copyright and Electronic Commerce.
Bygrave, L., and J. Koelman. 2000. Privacy, Data Protection and Copyright: Their Interaction in the Context of Electronic Copyright Management Systems, Copyright and Electronic Commerce.
Chandler, A. 1996. The Changing Definition and Image of Hackers in Popular Disclosure. International Journal of Sociology of Law – volume 24.
Cohen, J. 1997. Reflections on Copyright Management Systems and Laws Design to Protect them. Berkeley Technology Law Journal.
Duhl, J. and S. Kevorkian. 2001. Understanding DRM Systems, An IDC White Paper.
Fazekas, C. 2002. Vigilantes V. Pirates – The Rumble Over Peer to Peer Technology Hits the House Floor. Duke Law & Technology Review.
Field, C. 2000. New Uses and New Percentages: Music Contracts, Royalties, and Distribution Models in the Digital Millennium. UCLA Entertainment Law Review – volume 7.
Kerry, K. 2002. Music on the Internet: Is Technology Moving Faster than Copyright Law? 42 Santa Clara Law Rev. 967-993.
Koelman, k. J., and N. Helberger. 2000. Protection of Technological Measures, Copyright and Electronic Commerce.
Lantagne, S. 2004. The Morality of MP3s: The Failure of the Recording Industry’s Plan of Attack. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology – volume 18.
Liebowitz, S. J., 2003. Alternative Copyright Systems: The Problems with a Compulsory License-Based upon a talk delivered at a conference sponsored by the Progress and Freedom Foundation on June 10, 2003. School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas.
Liu, Q., R. Safavi-Naini, and N. Sheppard. 2003. Digital rights management for content distribution, Proceedings of the Australasian Information Security Workshop Conference on ACSW Frontiers 2003 - Volume 21.
Robinson, L. 2000. The Global Response to Digital Music Piracy. UCLA Entertainment Law Review – volume 7.
Riehl, D. 2001. Peer-to-Peer Distribution Systems: Will Napster, Gnutella, and Freenet Create a copyright Nirvana or Gehenna? William Mitchell Law Review - volume 27.
Roemer, R. 2000. The Digital Evolution: Freenet and the Future of Copyright on the Internet. UCLA Journal of Law & Technology 5.
Schlachter, S. 1997. The Intellectual Property Renaissance in Cyberspace: Why Copyright Law Could be Unimportant on the Internet. Berkeley Technology Law Journal.
Therien, J. 2001. Exorcising the Specter of a “Pay-Per-Use” Society: Toward Preserving Fair Use and the Public Domain in the Digital Age. BerkeleyTechnology Law Journal.
三、網站資料
立法院圖書館網站,http://npl.ly.gov.tw/index.jsp。
資策會市場情報中心,http://mic.iii.org.tw/intelligence。
經濟部智慧財產局,http://www.tipo.org.tw。
網際網路與應用資訊發展e週報,http://www.find.org.tw。
Borland, J. 2003.12.12. “Canada Deems P2P Downloading Legal”, available at http://news.com.com/2100-1025_3-5121479.html (assessed September, 2004).
EFF電子先鋒網站,http://www.eff.org/。
ITIS產業資料庫,http://www.itis.org.tw/。
P2P立法大聯盟網站,http://www.mp3user.org.tw/mp3/read.html。
P2P United,http://www.p2punited.org/parents.php。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
91353038
93
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0913530381
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 陳錦烽zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Jiin-Fengen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 陳慧鄉zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Chen, Hui-Hsiangen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳慧鄉zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Hui-Hsiangen_US
dc.date (日期) 2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-九月-2009 09:11:12 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-九月-2009 09:11:12 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-九月-2009 09:11:12 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0913530381en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34267-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91353038zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 網際網路的發達產生許多新的商業模式,線上音樂的興起即是一例,面對紛擾不斷的線上音樂交換,各國因應態度不一,如何兼顧科技發展及保護著作人權益儼然已成重要議題。著作權補償金制度精神在於補償著作權人在利用人合理使用下做遭受經濟上的損失,目前尚無國家對線上音樂交換業者收取補償金,本研究即欲探討補償金之徵收是否能有助於解決線上音樂之爭議、我國著作權法五十條之一修正案是否具可行空間,及線上音樂交換爭議各關係人在補償金制度中能扮演的角色為何。

本研究以次級資料分析之方式,針對補償金、強制授權、概括授權等制度進行探討,並深度訪談施行補償金制度之各關係人意見,研究結果發現補償金制度應用於線上音樂交換確有其空間,亦可有效彌補著作權人之損失,且有助於線上音樂交換業者與著作權人進行理性之談判。線上音樂交換業者亦可提供其科技能力,協助補償金制度施行,仲介團體雖已有徵收及分配權利金之經驗,但在補償金制度施行前仍應做好妥善之準備,俾使補償金制度有效運作。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) There have been great legal debates over the legitimacy of digital music distribution channels such as peer-to-peer file exchange system. Music industries insist that any unauthorized replication of music is illegal, whereas service providers thinks that technology is neutral and should not bear any responsibilities about the contents transferred through the platform it provides. Courts around the world have different opinions on the issue, and no viable solution has been found as yet.

Levy systems for copyright has been around for several decades, which recognizes the difficulty of authors (or owners) of copyright to enforce it. Levies will be collected for a host of different sources include blank media, recording devices and so on, which means sale of digital devices such and digital music players/recorders, maybe even the Internet access service or personal computers are subjects to levy collection. Government agencies in Europe, Japan and Canada has long been dealing with such issues and have their levy systems well established, which seems to be a viable solution for the digital music debates.

The history of levy system and the implementation in different countries were surveyed in this thesis, and in-depth interviews were conducted to examined the opinions of different parties (regarding the dispute over digital music distribution) by. It is found that a well-designed levy system could ease the tension between music and technology industry, therefore facilitate talks between them in search for a solution based on mutual interests. Another interesting finding is that the attitude toward peer-to-peer service provider is quite different between music industry and musicians. Distinction must be made between music industry and individual musicians if one intend to study the resolution of disputes in digital music distribution.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目錄 I
圖目錄 III
表目錄 IV
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究問題 3
第三節 論文架構 4
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 P2P(PEER TO PEER)檔案交換系統運作模式 6
第二節 數位版權管理(DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT) 9
第三節 著作權補償金制度 12
第四節 著作權法對音樂著作之特殊規定 21
第五節 加拿大個人下載MP3合法化與MP3播放器補償金之開徵 23
第三章 研究方法 25
第一節 觀念架構 25
第二節 研究方法及範圍 27
第三節 資料來源 28
第四章 線上音樂經營模式與衍生法律問題分析 30
第一節 線上音樂市場與經營模式 30
第二節 線上音樂法律爭議 45
第三節 著作權法第五十一條修正案評析 54
第五章 著作權仲介團體運作實務 56
第一節 仲介團體之組織 56
第二節 會員、仲介團體之權利與義務 60
第三節 我國著作權仲介團體之運作現況 61
第六章 深度訪談與研究發現 66
第一節 深度訪談 66
第二節 音樂創作者、唱片工業以及線上音樂業者的三角關係 71
第三節 著作權補償金可能帶來的機會 74
第四節 國內音樂著作權補償金試算 76
第五節 建立著作權補償金機制的前置條件 78
第七章 研究結論與建議 81
第一節 研究結論 81
第二節 研究限制 84
第三節 未來研究建議 85
參考文獻 86
一、中文部分 86
二、英文部分 87
三、網站資料 89
附錄一 90
附錄二 100
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 283217 bytes-
dc.format.extent 284383 bytes-
dc.format.extent 290989 bytes-
dc.format.extent 291710 bytes-
dc.format.extent 295269 bytes-
dc.format.extent 598830 bytes-
dc.format.extent 294671 bytes-
dc.format.extent 384778 bytes-
dc.format.extent 310504 bytes-
dc.format.extent 376184 bytes-
dc.format.extent 293012 bytes-
dc.format.extent 296488 bytes-
dc.format.extent 306761 bytes-
dc.format.extent 317576 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0913530381en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 點對點檔案交換zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 線上音樂交換zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 補償金zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) peer-to-peeren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) on-line music distributionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) levyen_US
dc.title (題名) 線上音樂與補償金機制之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A Study on the Levy System of Music Distribution in Digital Eraen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王立文,2004,探討P2P對唱片產業之衝擊及問題解決之道,台大商研所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王采瑜,2004,兼具安全與效率之適用於資訊商品數位權利機制,世新大學資管所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李宗德、陳怡秀、許凌殷,1993,因應網路科技發展之著作權法修正方向芻議 – 著作權補償金制度之引進,理慈國際科技法律事務所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林道燊,2003.10,MP3發展概況,台灣工業銀行。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林祺凱,2003,網際網路安全服務之實務研究,世新大學資管所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林忠賢,2003,以角色基礎之數位權利管理模式之研究,世新大學資管所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林承宗,2002,論網際網路上音樂著作權侵害之研究,中山大學中山學術研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 社團法人私的錄音補償金管理協會,2004,平成十五年度事業報告書暨決算報告書,社團法人私的錄音補償金管理協會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 洪春暉,2004,由Apple iTunes之成功看線上音樂經營模式的轉變消費,資策會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高珮芳,2004,線上音樂商店系統架構之競爭分析,政治大學智財所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 財團法人國際唱片業交流基金會,2005,國際唱片業看好線上音樂市場-合法授權將是關鍵,http://www.ifpi.org.tw/。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 章忠信,1998.3,著作權仲介團體條例簡述,月旦法學第三十四期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 章忠信,2004.11.26,著作權補償金之初探,『網際空間:資安、犯罪與法律社會』學術研究暨實務研討會論文集。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 章忠信,2004,公平會不能以警告函解決著作權仲介團體的濫權,http://www.copyrightnote.org/。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張基銘,2003,美國著作權保護制度之研究--以網際網路著作權為中心,淡江大學美研所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 莊心潔,2001,Peer-to-Peer多媒體傳輸科技著作權問題之研究,東吳大學法研所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊明仁,2003.10,預錄型光碟片市場概況,台灣工業銀行。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉茂林,2002,資訊法律,書泉出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉志良,2005.3.28,Copyright or Copywrong-美國P2P檔案分享與著作權的法律戰爭,太穎國際法律事務所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 資策會內容訓練處-資訊市場情報中心,2004.7,數位內容學院市場事件分析-由我國線上音樂商店成立談未來發展契機,經濟部工業局委託。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 資策會,2004.8,數位內容學院專題研究報告-線上音樂發展與趨勢分析,經濟部工業局委託。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 資策會,2004.9,數位內容學院市場分析-由Kuro與IFPI談我國線上音樂發展,經濟部工業局委託。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 資策會,2005,2004電子商務應用年鑑,資策會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 數位典藏國家型科技計畫技術發展組,2005,DRM Demo Site,中央研究院。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 希瓦˙維迪亞那桑,2003,著作權保護了誰?,商周出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡明誠,2003.6,國際著作權仲介團體制度之研究,經濟部智慧財產局委託專案。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡明誠,2001,數位時代著作權法律問題,經濟部智慧財產月刊。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉靜怡,網路音樂的死路或轉機?-Napster判決的分析與省思,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.ipeclaw.com.tw/argue_case/arguecase_napster_01.shtmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉尚志、陳佳麟,2001,數位音樂著作權之合理使用與侵權規範,智權情報網,http://www.apipa.org.tw/Article/。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳柏如,2002,數位時代著作權集體管理之研究,台灣大學法研所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳榮林,2003,點對點傳輸之著作權侵害問題─以美國法為中心,交通大學科技法律學程碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳月秀,2004,智慧財產權證券化-從美日經驗看我國實施可行性與立法之芻議,政治大學法研所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 賴文智,2003,數位著作權法,台北:益思科技法律事務所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 賴文智,數位時代個人利用著作合理使用範圍之再調整,網路資訊第122期,台北:益思科技法律事務所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 賴文智,2002.1,數位科技對著作權制度的衝擊,台北:益思科技法律事務所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭丁旺,2004.8,中級會計學(上),第八版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭立中,2003,網際網路對音樂產業智慧財產權的影響,政治大學智財所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蕭秉國,2003,後Napster時代Peer-to-Peer軟體對網路著作權的影響,智權情報網,http://www.apipa.org.tw/Article/。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Annemique, M.E. de Kroon. 2000. Protection of Copyright Management Information , Copyright and Electronic Commerce.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bygrave, L., and J. Koelman. 2000. Privacy, Data Protection and Copyright: Their Interaction in the Context of Electronic Copyright Management Systems, Copyright and Electronic Commerce.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chandler, A. 1996. The Changing Definition and Image of Hackers in Popular Disclosure. International Journal of Sociology of Law – volume 24.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cohen, J. 1997. Reflections on Copyright Management Systems and Laws Design to Protect them. Berkeley Technology Law Journal.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duhl, J. and S. Kevorkian. 2001. Understanding DRM Systems, An IDC White Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fazekas, C. 2002. Vigilantes V. Pirates – The Rumble Over Peer to Peer Technology Hits the House Floor. Duke Law & Technology Review.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Field, C. 2000. New Uses and New Percentages: Music Contracts, Royalties, and Distribution Models in the Digital Millennium. UCLA Entertainment Law Review – volume 7.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kerry, K. 2002. Music on the Internet: Is Technology Moving Faster than Copyright Law? 42 Santa Clara Law Rev. 967-993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Koelman, k. J., and N. Helberger. 2000. Protection of Technological Measures, Copyright and Electronic Commerce.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lantagne, S. 2004. The Morality of MP3s: The Failure of the Recording Industry’s Plan of Attack. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology – volume 18.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Liebowitz, S. J., 2003. Alternative Copyright Systems: The Problems with a Compulsory License-Based upon a talk delivered at a conference sponsored by the Progress and Freedom Foundation on June 10, 2003. School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Liu, Q., R. Safavi-Naini, and N. Sheppard. 2003. Digital rights management for content distribution, Proceedings of the Australasian Information Security Workshop Conference on ACSW Frontiers 2003 - Volume 21.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Robinson, L. 2000. The Global Response to Digital Music Piracy. UCLA Entertainment Law Review – volume 7.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Riehl, D. 2001. Peer-to-Peer Distribution Systems: Will Napster, Gnutella, and Freenet Create a copyright Nirvana or Gehenna? William Mitchell Law Review - volume 27.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Roemer, R. 2000. The Digital Evolution: Freenet and the Future of Copyright on the Internet. UCLA Journal of Law & Technology 5.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schlachter, S. 1997. The Intellectual Property Renaissance in Cyberspace: Why Copyright Law Could be Unimportant on the Internet. Berkeley Technology Law Journal.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Therien, J. 2001. Exorcising the Specter of a “Pay-Per-Use” Society: Toward Preserving Fair Use and the Public Domain in the Digital Age. BerkeleyTechnology Law Journal.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 三、網站資料zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 立法院圖書館網站,http://npl.ly.gov.tw/index.jsp。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 資策會市場情報中心,http://mic.iii.org.tw/intelligence。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 經濟部智慧財產局,http://www.tipo.org.tw。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 網際網路與應用資訊發展e週報,http://www.find.org.tw。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Borland, J. 2003.12.12. “Canada Deems P2P Downloading Legal”, available at http://news.com.com/2100-1025_3-5121479.html (assessed September, 2004).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) EFF電子先鋒網站,http://www.eff.org/。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ITIS產業資料庫,http://www.itis.org.tw/。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) P2P立法大聯盟網站,http://www.mp3user.org.tw/mp3/read.html。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) P2P United,http://www.p2punited.org/parents.php。zh_TW