學術產出-學位論文

題名 產業景氣與購併績效之研究
作者 吳家昌
Wu, Chia-Chang
貢獻者 屠美亞
Tu, Mei-ya
吳家昌
Wu, Chia-Chang
關鍵詞 購併
營運績效
產業景氣
日期 2004
上傳時間 18-九月-2009 13:37:25 (UTC+8)
摘要 過去國內學者研究購併後公司績效的變化,皆發現整體的績效降低,與國外學者的研究發現相異。由於國內學者使用的衡量變數並未調整產業結構因素,以及不同會計方法可能對衡量變數產生的影響,所以我們採用Healy et.al.(1992)的衡量變數,發現如下的結果:
一、購併後公司的實質經營績效有顯著的改善
二、分析綜效產生的來源,結果顯示購併之後,資產效率性雖然降低,但是現金利潤率提高。而且由於現金利潤率對於實質經營績效的貢獻較大,故購併後期的實質經營績效,較購併前期提高。
三、產業購併有群聚的現象。在產業收縮下進行的購併的公司,實質經營績效改善程度較高。績效改善的來源,為現金利潤率的顯著提升,資產周轉率不顯著異於擴張產業的購併公司
四、在產業擴張下進行購併的公司,購併前後實質經營績效無顯著差異
是故,當公司處於收縮的產業中,可藉由購併去整合資源,節省營業成本,達成績效上的提升。在擴張的產業中,公司也可藉由購併去快速獲取市場機會,但是購併後公司的經營績效並未顯著提升,抑或下降,所以在購併價格的支付上,必須注意避免過度支付。
參考文獻 一、 中文部分
1.方螢基,「企業合併策略對營運及績效影響之研究」,中山大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文,民國78年
2. 林永隆,「企業購併綜效在財務上之探討」,中興大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文,民國87年
3.洪宏達,「購併活動對主併公司經營績效之影響—以台灣上市公司為例」,中山大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文,民國92年
4.孫梅瑞、陳隆麒,「台灣地區上市公司從事購併活動對經營績效影響之研究」,中山管理評論,民國91年,第155頁—184頁
5.許淑瑋,「台灣企業購併後績效衡量之實證研究」,臺灣大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文,民國90年
6.葉秋美,「臺灣企業購併宣告對股東財富之影響」,政治大學國際貿易研究所未出版碩士論文,民國81年
7.楊勝淵、張紹基,「台灣企業購併實質效益之研究」,管理學報,第18卷第一期,民國90年
8.楊文禎,「台灣企業購併環境、企業特性與購併綜效關聯性之研究」,淡江大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文,民國92年
9.蕭惠元,「購併活動對股價行為與會計資訊之影響--以上市公司為例」,東吳大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文,民國85年
10.顏秀玲,「企業合併與財務績效關係之研究」,成功大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文,民國79年
二、 英文部分
1.Andrade, G., Stafford, E., 2004. Investing the economic role of mergers. Journal of Corporate Finance 10, 1-36.
2.Agrawal, A., J.F. Jaffe, and G.N. Mandelker, 1992. The post-merger performance of acquiring firms: a reexamination of an anomaly. Journal of Finance 47, 1605-1621.
3.Amit, R. and J. Livnat, 1988. Diversification strategies, business cycles, and economic performance. Strategic Management Journal, March-April, 99-110.
4.Asquith, P., and E.H. Kim, 1982. The impact of merger bids on the participating firms’ security holders. Journal of Finance 37, 1209-1228.
5.Asquith, P., and D.W Mullins, 1986. Equity issues and offering dilutions. Journal of Financial Economics 15, 61-89.
6.Beckenstein, A.R., 1979. Merger activity and merger theories: an empirical investigation. Antitrust Bulletin, spring, 105-128.
7.Becketti, S., 1986. Corporate mergers and the business cycle. Economic Review, May, 13-26.
8.Berkovitch, E., and M.P. Narayanan, 1993. Motives for takeovers: an empirical investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 28, 347-362.
9.Bradley, Michael, Anand Desai and E. Han Kim, 1988. Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms. Journal of Financial Economics 21, 3-41.
10.Caves, Richard, 1989. Takeovers and economic efficiency: foresight vs. hindsight. International Journal of Industrial Organization 7, 151-174.
11.Choi, D., and G.C. Philippatos, 1983. An examination of merger synergism. Journal of Financial Research 6, 239-256.
12.Gaughan, Patrick A, 1999. Mergers, acquisitions, and corporate restructurings, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons.
13.Ghosh, Aloke, 2001. Does operating performance really improve following corporate acquisitions? Journal of Corporate Finance 7, 151-178.
14.Harford, J., 1999. Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions. The Journal of Finance 54, 1969-1997.
15.Healy, P.M., K.G. Palepu, and R.S. Ruback, 1992. Does corporate performance improve after mergers? Journal of Financial Economics 31, 135-175.
16.Healy, P.M., K.G. Palepu, and R.S. Ruback, 1997. Which takeovers are profitable? Strategic or Financial? Sloan Management Review 38, 45-57.
17.Jensen, M., 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and control systems. Journal of Finance 48, 831-880.
18.Johnston, J., 1984. Testing for Heteroscedasticity. Econometric methods 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 298-300.
19.Lang, L.H.P., R. Stulz, and R.A. Walking, 1989. Managerial performance, Tobin’s q, and the gains from successful tender offers. Journal of Financial Economics 24, 137-155.
20.Lang, L.H.P., R. Stulz, and R.A. Walking, 1991. A test of the free cash flow hypothesis. Journal of Financial Economics 29, 315-335.
21.Linn, S.C. and Jeannette A. Switzer, 2001. Are cash acquisitions associated with better postcombination operating performance than stock acquisitions? Journal of Banking & Finance 25, 1113-1138.
22.Martin, K.J., and J.J. McConnell, 1991. Corporate performance, corporate takeovers, and management turnover. Journal of Finance 46, 671-687.
23.Mitchell, M., and J. Mulherin, 1996. The impact of industry shocks on takeover and restructuring activity. Journal of Financial Economics 41, 193-229.
24.Morck, R., A. Shleifer, R. Vishny, 1988. Characteristics of targets of hostile and friendly takeovers. In: Auerbach, A.J. (Ed.), Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences. University of Chicago Press/NBER, Chicago, IL.
25.Morck, R., A. Shleifer, R. Vishny, 1990. Do managerial objectives drive bad acquisitions? The Journal of Finance 45, 31-48.
26.Myers, S.C., and N.S. Majluf, 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187-221.
27.Ravenscraft, D.J., and F.M. Scherer, 1989. The profitability of mergers. International Journal of Industrial Organization 7, 101-116.
28.Roll, R., 1986. The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business 59, 197-216.
29.Schoenberg, R., and R. Reeves, 1999. What determines acquisition activity within an industry? European Management Journal 17, 93-98.
30.Seth, A., 1990. Value creation in acquisitions: a reexamination of performance issues. Strategic Management Journal 11, 91-115.
31.Shleifer, A., and R.W. Vishny, 1989. Management Entrenchment: The Case of Manager-Specific Investments. Journal of Financial Economics 25, 123-140.
32.Shrieves, R.E., and M.M. Pashley, 1984. Evidence on the association between mergers and capital structure. Financial Management, autumn, 39-48.
33.Smith, R.L., and Kim, Joo-Hyun, 1994. The combined effects of free cash flow and financial slack on bidder and target stock returns. The Journal of Finance 67, 281-310.
34.Switzer, J.A., 1996. Evidence on real gains in corporate acquisitions, Journal of Economics and Business 48, 443-460.
35.Travlos, N.G., 1987. Corporate takeover bids, methods of payment, and bidding firms’ stock returns. Journal of Finance 42, 943-963.
36.Yagil, J., 1996. Mergers and Macro-Economics Factors. Review of Financial Economics, Vol. 5, 181-190
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所
91355007
93
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0913550072
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 屠美亞zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Tu, Mei-yaen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 吳家昌zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Wu, Chia-Changen_US
dc.creator (作者) 吳家昌zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Wu, Chia-Changen_US
dc.date (日期) 2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-九月-2009 13:37:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-九月-2009 13:37:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-九月-2009 13:37:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0913550072en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35034-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 企業管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91355007zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 過去國內學者研究購併後公司績效的變化,皆發現整體的績效降低,與國外學者的研究發現相異。由於國內學者使用的衡量變數並未調整產業結構因素,以及不同會計方法可能對衡量變數產生的影響,所以我們採用Healy et.al.(1992)的衡量變數,發現如下的結果:
一、購併後公司的實質經營績效有顯著的改善
二、分析綜效產生的來源,結果顯示購併之後,資產效率性雖然降低,但是現金利潤率提高。而且由於現金利潤率對於實質經營績效的貢獻較大,故購併後期的實質經營績效,較購併前期提高。
三、產業購併有群聚的現象。在產業收縮下進行的購併的公司,實質經營績效改善程度較高。績效改善的來源,為現金利潤率的顯著提升,資產周轉率不顯著異於擴張產業的購併公司
四、在產業擴張下進行購併的公司,購併前後實質經營績效無顯著差異
是故,當公司處於收縮的產業中,可藉由購併去整合資源,節省營業成本,達成績效上的提升。在擴張的產業中,公司也可藉由購併去快速獲取市場機會,但是購併後公司的經營績效並未顯著提升,抑或下降,所以在購併價格的支付上,必須注意避免過度支付。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程與論文架構 4

第二章 文獻回顧
第一節 購併之定義 6
第二節 購併的會計處理方法 7
第三節 企業進行購併的動機 9
第四節 購併對企業績效的影響 11
第五節 購併支付方式對企業績效的影響 13
第六節 產業因素對購併的影響 13

第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究假說 18
第二節 變數定義 19
第三節 研究方法 23
第四節 實證模型設定 26
第五節 樣本篩選 27

第四章 實證結果與分析
第一節 敘述性統計分析 30
第二節 產業購併活動之群聚現象探討 39
第三節 購併實質績效之探討與來源分析 40
第四節 產業對購併實質績效之影響 43
第五節 健全性測試(Robustness Test) 45

第五章 結論與建議
第一節 研究結論 48
第二節 研究限制與建議 49

附錄 51

參考文獻 55
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 76783 bytes-
dc.format.extent 113387 bytes-
dc.format.extent 98359 bytes-
dc.format.extent 101236 bytes-
dc.format.extent 152354 bytes-
dc.format.extent 222393 bytes-
dc.format.extent 233211 bytes-
dc.format.extent 555465 bytes-
dc.format.extent 124434 bytes-
dc.format.extent 222244 bytes-
dc.format.extent 117940 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0913550072en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 購併zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 營運績效zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 產業景氣zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 產業景氣與購併績效之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、 中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.方螢基,「企業合併策略對營運及績效影響之研究」,中山大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文,民國78年zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. 林永隆,「企業購併綜效在財務上之探討」,中興大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文,民國87年zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.洪宏達,「購併活動對主併公司經營績效之影響—以台灣上市公司為例」,中山大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文,民國92年zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.孫梅瑞、陳隆麒,「台灣地區上市公司從事購併活動對經營績效影響之研究」,中山管理評論,民國91年,第155頁—184頁zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.許淑瑋,「台灣企業購併後績效衡量之實證研究」,臺灣大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文,民國90年zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.葉秋美,「臺灣企業購併宣告對股東財富之影響」,政治大學國際貿易研究所未出版碩士論文,民國81年zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.楊勝淵、張紹基,「台灣企業購併實質效益之研究」,管理學報,第18卷第一期,民國90年zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.楊文禎,「台灣企業購併環境、企業特性與購併綜效關聯性之研究」,淡江大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文,民國92年zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.蕭惠元,「購併活動對股價行為與會計資訊之影響--以上市公司為例」,東吳大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文,民國85年zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.顏秀玲,「企業合併與財務績效關係之研究」,成功大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文,民國79年zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、 英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.Andrade, G., Stafford, E., 2004. Investing the economic role of mergers. Journal of Corporate Finance 10, 1-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.Agrawal, A., J.F. Jaffe, and G.N. Mandelker, 1992. The post-merger performance of acquiring firms: a reexamination of an anomaly. Journal of Finance 47, 1605-1621.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.Amit, R. and J. Livnat, 1988. Diversification strategies, business cycles, and economic performance. Strategic Management Journal, March-April, 99-110.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.Asquith, P., and E.H. Kim, 1982. The impact of merger bids on the participating firms’ security holders. Journal of Finance 37, 1209-1228.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.Asquith, P., and D.W Mullins, 1986. Equity issues and offering dilutions. Journal of Financial Economics 15, 61-89.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.Beckenstein, A.R., 1979. Merger activity and merger theories: an empirical investigation. Antitrust Bulletin, spring, 105-128.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.Becketti, S., 1986. Corporate mergers and the business cycle. Economic Review, May, 13-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.Berkovitch, E., and M.P. Narayanan, 1993. Motives for takeovers: an empirical investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 28, 347-362.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.Bradley, Michael, Anand Desai and E. Han Kim, 1988. Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms. Journal of Financial Economics 21, 3-41.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.Caves, Richard, 1989. Takeovers and economic efficiency: foresight vs. hindsight. International Journal of Industrial Organization 7, 151-174.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.Choi, D., and G.C. Philippatos, 1983. An examination of merger synergism. Journal of Financial Research 6, 239-256.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.Gaughan, Patrick A, 1999. Mergers, acquisitions, and corporate restructurings, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.Ghosh, Aloke, 2001. Does operating performance really improve following corporate acquisitions? Journal of Corporate Finance 7, 151-178.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.Harford, J., 1999. Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions. The Journal of Finance 54, 1969-1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.Healy, P.M., K.G. Palepu, and R.S. Ruback, 1992. Does corporate performance improve after mergers? Journal of Financial Economics 31, 135-175.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16.Healy, P.M., K.G. Palepu, and R.S. Ruback, 1997. Which takeovers are profitable? Strategic or Financial? Sloan Management Review 38, 45-57.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.Jensen, M., 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and control systems. Journal of Finance 48, 831-880.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18.Johnston, J., 1984. Testing for Heteroscedasticity. Econometric methods 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 298-300.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19.Lang, L.H.P., R. Stulz, and R.A. Walking, 1989. Managerial performance, Tobin’s q, and the gains from successful tender offers. Journal of Financial Economics 24, 137-155.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20.Lang, L.H.P., R. Stulz, and R.A. Walking, 1991. A test of the free cash flow hypothesis. Journal of Financial Economics 29, 315-335.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21.Linn, S.C. and Jeannette A. Switzer, 2001. Are cash acquisitions associated with better postcombination operating performance than stock acquisitions? Journal of Banking & Finance 25, 1113-1138.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22.Martin, K.J., and J.J. McConnell, 1991. Corporate performance, corporate takeovers, and management turnover. Journal of Finance 46, 671-687.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23.Mitchell, M., and J. Mulherin, 1996. The impact of industry shocks on takeover and restructuring activity. Journal of Financial Economics 41, 193-229.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24.Morck, R., A. Shleifer, R. Vishny, 1988. Characteristics of targets of hostile and friendly takeovers. In: Auerbach, A.J. (Ed.), Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences. University of Chicago Press/NBER, Chicago, IL.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25.Morck, R., A. Shleifer, R. Vishny, 1990. Do managerial objectives drive bad acquisitions? The Journal of Finance 45, 31-48.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26.Myers, S.C., and N.S. Majluf, 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187-221.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27.Ravenscraft, D.J., and F.M. Scherer, 1989. The profitability of mergers. International Journal of Industrial Organization 7, 101-116.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28.Roll, R., 1986. The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business 59, 197-216.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 29.Schoenberg, R., and R. Reeves, 1999. What determines acquisition activity within an industry? European Management Journal 17, 93-98.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 30.Seth, A., 1990. Value creation in acquisitions: a reexamination of performance issues. Strategic Management Journal 11, 91-115.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 31.Shleifer, A., and R.W. Vishny, 1989. Management Entrenchment: The Case of Manager-Specific Investments. Journal of Financial Economics 25, 123-140.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 32.Shrieves, R.E., and M.M. Pashley, 1984. Evidence on the association between mergers and capital structure. Financial Management, autumn, 39-48.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 33.Smith, R.L., and Kim, Joo-Hyun, 1994. The combined effects of free cash flow and financial slack on bidder and target stock returns. The Journal of Finance 67, 281-310.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 34.Switzer, J.A., 1996. Evidence on real gains in corporate acquisitions, Journal of Economics and Business 48, 443-460.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 35.Travlos, N.G., 1987. Corporate takeover bids, methods of payment, and bidding firms’ stock returns. Journal of Finance 42, 943-963.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 36.Yagil, J., 1996. Mergers and Macro-Economics Factors. Review of Financial Economics, Vol. 5, 181-190zh_TW