Publications-Theses

題名 思考模式與自我構念、購後失調之關係-以挪威消費者為例
作者 湯俊章
Tang,Jiunjang
貢獻者 別蓮蒂
湯俊章
Tang,Jiunjang
關鍵詞 自我構念
系統式思考
簡則式思考
購後失調
功能消費
享樂消費
日期 2004
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 13:42:46 (UTC+8)
摘要 自從歐盟成立後,我國對其出口值每年皆有百分之十以上的成長率,歐洲市場的重要性不言可喻,但國內學術界對歐洲消費者的研究則屈指可數。造成此現象原因有二,首先是過去台灣對歐洲市場的重視程度不比中、美、日。其次則為歐洲資料取得不易,即使是二手資料都無相關獲取管道,這跟台灣大部分的留外歸國師資有很大的關係,相較於美、中、日,學者對歐洲的連結關係較弱。但隨著國內赴歐洲交換學生的趨勢漸起,提供國內學術界另一瞭解歐洲市場的機會。因此,該如何利用此機會,以化解實務界對歐洲消費者不瞭解的窘境,已成為當務之急。
本研究首先從過去跨文化研究中個人與集體主義分類開始,延伸至單一文化體下個人的獨立與互賴自我構念與消費者思考模式的差異。推論出個人主義下的消費者傾向使用系統式的思考模式,並且大部分的人皆具有獨立的自我構念;而集體主義下的消費者則傾向使用簡則式的思考模式,並且大部分的人皆具有互賴的自我構念。但由於獨立、互賴自我構念與系統、簡則式思考可並存於單一文化體之下,因此,本研究在單一文化體下探討這些關係是否依然存在。此外,消費者使用的思考模式將決定其獲取資訊的來源與方式。對於不同的思考方式所做的購買決策若產生失誤時,消費者本身所習慣採用的思考模式與當次的消費價值將如何影響消費者的購後失調,則為本研究欲探討的另一課題。
經過驗證後發現在探討個人自我構念與思考模式的關係部分,北歐文化體制下的挪威消費者的獨立自我構念與系統式思考相關,而互賴自我構念則與簡則式思考相關,這項結論支持了在單一文化體之下此關係仍然存在。此外,在探討思考模式對購後失調的影響方面,習慣於使用簡則式思考的消費者,在面對功能性消費時會產生較低的購後失調,而對於享樂性消費,則會產生較高的購後失調。但是系統式思考並不會對購後失調產生顯著的影響,此點則與一般認為愈理性決策的人失調程度愈低的常識相違背。
最後,本研究從研究結論中,提出數點可事先降低消費者購後失調的策略建議與方案,做為實務界能有效降低補償失調消費者的成本,並提昇消費者的再購率的執行方法。而對某些無法補償失調消費者的交易型產業而言,這樣的策略建議更是其唯一降低消費者購後失調的著力點。
The importance of the European market goes without saying. After the establishment of the European Union, Taiwan’s export value to the European market increased over 10% every year, but the domestic academia are still few in studying about this topic. Two reasons cause this phenomenon. First of all, compared to entering Chinese, American and Japanese markets, European markets were the last choice in the past. Secondly, it is difficult to obtain European material, even second-hand material, because most of Taiwan’s scholars, who have mostly studied in America or Japan, have relatively weak relationships with European academic circles. However, with the number of exchange students going to Europe rising, this offers domestic academia a chance to access the European market. Hence how to utilize this trend of exchange students to Europe to dissolve the awkward situation of having an unknown European market has already become the academia’s top priority.
This research extends from the difference between Individualism and Collectivism, one of the cross-cultural dimensions, to the difference between independent and dependent self-construct of consumers in a culture. Consumers under individualism incline to use the systemic thinking style and most of them own independent self-construct; consumers under collectivism incline to use the hedonic thinking style and most of them own dependent self-construct. Independent and dependent self-construct and systemic and hedonic thinking style can coexist in a single cultural body, so this research wants to know if the relationships among these variables still exist under the same single culture. In addition, the thinking style that consumers use decides the sources of information that consumers adopt. Hence, another issue this research wants to discuss is about how the consumers’ thinking style relates to their post-purchasing dissonance at their unsatisfied consumption. To utilize the chance of exchanging student to Norway, the research regards consumers in Oslo, Norway as the research sample through the questionnaire investigation. The total amount of issues is 813 among which the amount of 688 was retrieved, and the count of effective samples is 355.
The research finds that independent construct correlates with systemic thinking style and dependent construct correlates with hedonic thinking style under the cultural system in the north of Europe. This conclusion has supported that this relation under the single cultural body still exists. In addition, consumers, who are accustomed to the hedonic thinking style, will bring lower post-purchasing dissonance under functional consumption, but higher post-purchasing dissonance under hedonic consumption. However, systemic thinking style has no significant influence on post-purchasing dissonance and this point violates the common sense that rational thinking will bring lower dissonance. Finally, this research develops some advice from the study’s conclusion to reduce consumer’s post-purchasing dissonance and to raise the rate of repurchasing in hopes to decrease the cost of business compensating unsatisfied consumers.
參考文獻 中文部分
吳祉芸 (1992),「兩岸品牌個性之跨文化比較-以報紙廣告為例」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
葉芳妤 (1993),「比較台灣與日本兩國消費者購買型態之差異-以洗面乳為研究對象」,國立嘉義大學管理研究所碩士論文。
劉又菁 (1992),「從欲求利益觀點探討台灣電影之市場區隔-以美國電影為研究對象」,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
劉宗其、李奇動、黃吉村、渥頓 (2001),「服務失誤類型、補償措施與再惠顧率之探索性研究—以CIT法應用於餐飲業為例」,管理評論,第二十一卷第三期,頁49-68。
劉峻榮 (1993),「義大利冰淇淋之市場區隔研究」,國立台北大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
英文部分
Aaker, Jennifer L. and Durairaj Maheswaran (1997). The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.24(December), PP.315-324.
Anderson, Rolph E. (1973). Consumer Dissatisfaction: The Effect of Disconfirmed Expectancy on Perceived Product Performance. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 10 (February), PP. 38-44.
Babin, Barry J., William R. Darden, and Mitch Griffin (1994). Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.20, PP.644-653.
Bitner, Mary Jo, Bernard H. Booms, and Mary Stanfield Tetreault (1990). The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents. Journal of Marketing, Vol.54, PP.71-84.
Bitner, Mary Jo, Bernard H. Booms, and Lois A. Mohr (1994). Critical Service Encounters: The Employee’s Viewpoint. Journal of Marketing, Vol.58, PP.95-106.
Brooker, Peter (1984). Aircraft Collision Risk in the North Atlantic Region. The Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol.35, PP.695-704.
Brucks, Merrie (1985). The Effect of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.12, PP.1-16.
Cacioppo, John T. and Richard E. Petty (1982). The Need for Cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.42, PP.116-131.
Chaiken, Shelly (1980). Heuristic versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source versus Message Cues in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.39, No.5, PP.752-766.
Chaiken, Shelly, Danny Axsom, and Suzanne Yates (1987). Audience Response as a Heuristic Cue in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.53, P.30.
Chaiken, Shelly and Akiva Liberman (1991). Value Conflict and Thought-Induced Attitude Change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.27, P. 203.
Chaiken, Shelly and Durairaj Mahesswaran (1991). Promoting Systematic Processing in Low-Motivation Settings: Effect of Incongruent Information on Processing and Judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.61, No.1, PP.13-25.
Chaiken, Shelly and Durairaj Maheswaran (1994). Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.66, P.460.
Cooper, Joel and Russell H. Fazio (1984). A New Look at Dissonance Theory. Advances in Experimental social Psychology, Vol. 17, PP. 229-266.
Crowley, Ayn E. and Eric R. Spangenberg (1992). Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Attitudes toward Product Categories. Marketing Letters, Vol.3, Nov.3, PP.239-249.
Cummings, William H. and M. Venkatesan (1976). Cognitive Dissonance and Consumer Behavior: A Review of the Evidence, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.13, No.3, PP.303-308.
Festinger, Leon (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Ch2. PP.25-42, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Flanagan, John C. (1954). The Critical Incident Technique. Psychological Bulletin, Vol.51, PP.327-351.
Hempel, Donald J. (1977). Consumer Satisfaction with the Home Buying Process: Conceptualization and Measurement. The Conceptualization and Measurement of Consumer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction, H. Keith Hunt (ed.) Cambridge. MA: Marketing Science Institute: 7-9.
Hirschman, Elizabeth C. and Morris B. Holbrook (1982). Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods, and Propositions. Journal of Marketing, Vol.46, PP.92-101.
Hirschman, Elizabeth C. and Morris B. Holbrook (1982). The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.9 (September), PP.132-139.
Hoffman, K Douglas, Scott W. Kelley, and Holly M. Rotalsky (1995). Tracking Service Failures and Employee Recovery Efforts. The Journal of Service Marketing, Vol.9, Nov.2, PP.49-61.
Hoffman, K Douglas, Scott W. Kelley, and Beth C. Chung (2003). A CIT Investigation of Servicescape Failure and Associated Recovery Strategies. The Journal of Service Marketing, Vol.17, 4/5, P. 322.
Holbrook, Morris B (1990). Actions and Reactions in the Consumption Experience: the Complementary Roles of Reasons and Emotions in Consumer Behavior. Research in Consumer Behavior, Vol.4, PP.131-163.
Holbrook, Morris B (1999). Introduction to Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research. Routledge, London, PP. 1-28.
Holbrook, Morris B. and Michela Addis (2001). On the Conceptual Link between Mass Customization and Experiential Consumption: An Explosion of Subjectivity. Journal of Consumer Behavior, Vol.1, PP.50-66.
Holloway, Robert J. (1967). An Experiment on Consumer Dissonance. Journal of Marketing, Vol.31, PP.39-43.
Hofstede, Geert (1980). Culture’s Consequences. Ch.5 PP.213-259, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, Geert (1983). National Cultures in Four Dimensions: A Research-based Theory of Cultural Differences among Nations. Studies of Management and Organization Int., Vol.13, No.1-2, PP.46-74.
Hofstede, Geert (1990). Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Ch.3 PP.49-78, Landon: Mcgraw-Hill.
Mattila, Anna S. (2003). The Impact of Cognitive Inertia on Postconsumption Evaluation Process. Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.31. No.2, PP.288-299.
Markus, Hazel Rose and Shinobu Kitayama (1991). Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, Vol.98, No.2, PP.224-253.
McElroy, Todd and John J. Seta (2003). Framing effects: An Analytic-Holistic Perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.39, PP.610-617.
Montgomery, C. and Peter J. Barnes (1993). POSTDIS: A Short Rating Scale for Measuring Postpurchase Dissonance. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, Vol.6, PP.204-216.
Neuwirth, Kurt, Edward Frederick, and Charles Mayo (2002). Person-Effects and Heuristic-Systematic Processing. Communication Research, Vol.29, NO.3 PP.320-359.
Oliver, Richard L. (1997). Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. McGraw-Hill Book company, New York.
Oliver, Richard L. and Wayne Desarbo S. (1988). Response Determinants in Satisfaction Judgements. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.14, PP.495-508.
Russo, J. Edward, Margaret G. Meloy, and Victoria Husted Medvec (1998). Predecisional Distortion of Product Information. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.35, PP.438-452.
Shiloh Shoshana, Efrat Salton, and Dana Sharabi (2002). Individual Differences in Rational and Intuitive Thinking Styles as Predictors of Heuristic Responses and Framing Effects. Personality and Individual Differences, No.32, PP.415-429.
Shostack, Lynn (1977). Breaking Free from Product Marketing, Journal of Marketing, April, PP.73-80.
Shostack, Lynn (1985). Planning the Service Encounter, In Czepjel J., M. Solomon and C. Suprenant (eds) The Service Encounter, 1-23. Mass.: Lexington Books.
Simon, Herbert A. (1976). Administrative Behavior (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
Singelis, Theodore M. (1994). The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals. The Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.20, No.5, PP.580-591.
Soloman, Michael R., Carol Surprenant, John A. Czepiel, and Evelyn G. Gutman (1985). A Role Theory Perspective on Dynamic Interactions: The Service Encounter. Journal of Marketing, Vol.49, Winter, PP. 99-111.
Strong, Edward K. (1925). An Interest Test for Personnel Managers. Personnel Journal, Vol.5, PP. 194-204.
Sweeney, Jillian C., Douglas Hausknecht, and Geoffrey N. Soutar (2000). Cognitive Dissonance after Purchase: A Multidimensional Scale. Journal of Psychology and Marketing, Vol.17, No.5, PP.369-386.
Sweeney, Jillian C. and Geoffrey N. Soutar (2003). Are There Cognitive Dissonance Segments? Australian Journal of Management, Vol.28, No.3, PP.227-249.
Taylor, Steven E., and Fiske S. (1978). Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.11, PP.249-288.
Triandis, Harry C. (1985). Allocentric versus Idiocentric Tendencies: Convergent and Discriminant Validation. Journal of Respective Personality, Vol.19, PP.395-415.
Triandis, Harry C. and Robert Bontempo (1988). Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Self-Ingroup Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.54, P.323.
Triandis, Harry C. (1989). The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts. Psychological Review, Vol.96, lss. 3, P.506.
Triandis, Harry C. (1994). Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications. Ch. 3 P.47, CA: Sage.
Triandis, Harry. C. and Eunkook M. Suh (2002). Cultural Influences on Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol.53, PP.133-160.
Watkins, Harry S.and Raymond Liu (1996). Collectivism, Individualism and In-group Membership: Implications for Consumer Complaining Behaviors in Multicultural Contexts. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, Vol.8, PP.69-94.
Webster, Cynthia and D. S. Sundaram (1998). Service Consumption Criticality in Failure Recovery. Journal of Business Research, Vol.41, PP. 153-159.
Wellish, Hans (1972). From Information Science to Informatics: A Terminological Investigation. Journal of Librarianship, Vol.4, PP.158-187.
Zanna, Mark P. and Gerald N. Sande (1987). The Effects of Collective Actions on the Attitudes of Individual Group Members: A Dissonance Analysis. Social Influence: the Ontario Symposium, Vol.5, PP.151-163.
Zenhausern, Robert (1978). Imagery, Cerebral Dominance and Style of Thinking: A Unified Field Model. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, Vol.12, PP.381-384.
Zenhausern, Robert and Leslie Nickel (1979). Hemispheric Dominance and Maze Learning. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, Vol. 14(6), PP.435-436.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所
92355081
93
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923550811
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 別蓮蒂zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 湯俊章zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Tang,Jiunjangen_US
dc.creator (作者) 湯俊章zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Tang,Jiunjangen_US
dc.date (日期) 2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 13:42:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 13:42:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 13:42:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0923550811en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35066-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 企業管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92355081zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 自從歐盟成立後,我國對其出口值每年皆有百分之十以上的成長率,歐洲市場的重要性不言可喻,但國內學術界對歐洲消費者的研究則屈指可數。造成此現象原因有二,首先是過去台灣對歐洲市場的重視程度不比中、美、日。其次則為歐洲資料取得不易,即使是二手資料都無相關獲取管道,這跟台灣大部分的留外歸國師資有很大的關係,相較於美、中、日,學者對歐洲的連結關係較弱。但隨著國內赴歐洲交換學生的趨勢漸起,提供國內學術界另一瞭解歐洲市場的機會。因此,該如何利用此機會,以化解實務界對歐洲消費者不瞭解的窘境,已成為當務之急。
本研究首先從過去跨文化研究中個人與集體主義分類開始,延伸至單一文化體下個人的獨立與互賴自我構念與消費者思考模式的差異。推論出個人主義下的消費者傾向使用系統式的思考模式,並且大部分的人皆具有獨立的自我構念;而集體主義下的消費者則傾向使用簡則式的思考模式,並且大部分的人皆具有互賴的自我構念。但由於獨立、互賴自我構念與系統、簡則式思考可並存於單一文化體之下,因此,本研究在單一文化體下探討這些關係是否依然存在。此外,消費者使用的思考模式將決定其獲取資訊的來源與方式。對於不同的思考方式所做的購買決策若產生失誤時,消費者本身所習慣採用的思考模式與當次的消費價值將如何影響消費者的購後失調,則為本研究欲探討的另一課題。
經過驗證後發現在探討個人自我構念與思考模式的關係部分,北歐文化體制下的挪威消費者的獨立自我構念與系統式思考相關,而互賴自我構念則與簡則式思考相關,這項結論支持了在單一文化體之下此關係仍然存在。此外,在探討思考模式對購後失調的影響方面,習慣於使用簡則式思考的消費者,在面對功能性消費時會產生較低的購後失調,而對於享樂性消費,則會產生較高的購後失調。但是系統式思考並不會對購後失調產生顯著的影響,此點則與一般認為愈理性決策的人失調程度愈低的常識相違背。
最後,本研究從研究結論中,提出數點可事先降低消費者購後失調的策略建議與方案,做為實務界能有效降低補償失調消費者的成本,並提昇消費者的再購率的執行方法。而對某些無法補償失調消費者的交易型產業而言,這樣的策略建議更是其唯一降低消費者購後失調的著力點。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The importance of the European market goes without saying. After the establishment of the European Union, Taiwan’s export value to the European market increased over 10% every year, but the domestic academia are still few in studying about this topic. Two reasons cause this phenomenon. First of all, compared to entering Chinese, American and Japanese markets, European markets were the last choice in the past. Secondly, it is difficult to obtain European material, even second-hand material, because most of Taiwan’s scholars, who have mostly studied in America or Japan, have relatively weak relationships with European academic circles. However, with the number of exchange students going to Europe rising, this offers domestic academia a chance to access the European market. Hence how to utilize this trend of exchange students to Europe to dissolve the awkward situation of having an unknown European market has already become the academia’s top priority.
This research extends from the difference between Individualism and Collectivism, one of the cross-cultural dimensions, to the difference between independent and dependent self-construct of consumers in a culture. Consumers under individualism incline to use the systemic thinking style and most of them own independent self-construct; consumers under collectivism incline to use the hedonic thinking style and most of them own dependent self-construct. Independent and dependent self-construct and systemic and hedonic thinking style can coexist in a single cultural body, so this research wants to know if the relationships among these variables still exist under the same single culture. In addition, the thinking style that consumers use decides the sources of information that consumers adopt. Hence, another issue this research wants to discuss is about how the consumers’ thinking style relates to their post-purchasing dissonance at their unsatisfied consumption. To utilize the chance of exchanging student to Norway, the research regards consumers in Oslo, Norway as the research sample through the questionnaire investigation. The total amount of issues is 813 among which the amount of 688 was retrieved, and the count of effective samples is 355.
The research finds that independent construct correlates with systemic thinking style and dependent construct correlates with hedonic thinking style under the cultural system in the north of Europe. This conclusion has supported that this relation under the single cultural body still exists. In addition, consumers, who are accustomed to the hedonic thinking style, will bring lower post-purchasing dissonance under functional consumption, but higher post-purchasing dissonance under hedonic consumption. However, systemic thinking style has no significant influence on post-purchasing dissonance and this point violates the common sense that rational thinking will bring lower dissonance. Finally, this research develops some advice from the study’s conclusion to reduce consumer’s post-purchasing dissonance and to raise the rate of repurchasing in hopes to decrease the cost of business compensating unsatisfied consumers.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 研究動機與目的 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 系統式與簡則式的思考模式 5
第二節 個人主義與集體主義 9
第三節 購後失調 17
第四節 服務失誤分類 23
第五節 功能與享樂性消費 27
第三章 研究方法 34
第一節 研究架構與假設 35
第二節 變數的定義與衡量 37
第三節 問卷設計 43
第四節 抽樣方法與統計分析 48
第四章 研究結果 50
第一節 樣本結構說明 51
第二節 信度分析 52
第三節 各變數描述性統計 53
第四節 假說驗證 55
第五節 小結 61
第五章 結論與建議 63
第一節 結論與討論 64
第二節 建議與貢獻 68
第三節 研究限制與後續發展 71
參考文獻 75
中文部分 75
英文部分 75
附錄 82
附錄一 前測問卷 82
附錄二 最終版問卷 88
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 61073 bytes-
dc.format.extent 172458 bytes-
dc.format.extent 47364 bytes-
dc.format.extent 77197 bytes-
dc.format.extent 54258 bytes-
dc.format.extent 190206 bytes-
dc.format.extent 198339 bytes-
dc.format.extent 345834 bytes-
dc.format.extent 87450 bytes-
dc.format.extent 53386 bytes-
dc.format.extent 49569 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923550811en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 自我構念zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 系統式思考zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 簡則式思考zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 購後失調zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 功能消費zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 享樂消費zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 思考模式與自我構念、購後失調之關係-以挪威消費者為例zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳祉芸 (1992),「兩岸品牌個性之跨文化比較-以報紙廣告為例」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉芳妤 (1993),「比較台灣與日本兩國消費者購買型態之差異-以洗面乳為研究對象」,國立嘉義大學管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉又菁 (1992),「從欲求利益觀點探討台灣電影之市場區隔-以美國電影為研究對象」,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉宗其、李奇動、黃吉村、渥頓 (2001),「服務失誤類型、補償措施與再惠顧率之探索性研究—以CIT法應用於餐飲業為例」,管理評論,第二十一卷第三期,頁49-68。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉峻榮 (1993),「義大利冰淇淋之市場區隔研究」,國立台北大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Aaker, Jennifer L. and Durairaj Maheswaran (1997). The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.24(December), PP.315-324.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anderson, Rolph E. (1973). Consumer Dissatisfaction: The Effect of Disconfirmed Expectancy on Perceived Product Performance. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 10 (February), PP. 38-44.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Babin, Barry J., William R. Darden, and Mitch Griffin (1994). Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.20, PP.644-653.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bitner, Mary Jo, Bernard H. Booms, and Mary Stanfield Tetreault (1990). The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents. Journal of Marketing, Vol.54, PP.71-84.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bitner, Mary Jo, Bernard H. Booms, and Lois A. Mohr (1994). Critical Service Encounters: The Employee’s Viewpoint. Journal of Marketing, Vol.58, PP.95-106.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brooker, Peter (1984). Aircraft Collision Risk in the North Atlantic Region. The Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol.35, PP.695-704.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brucks, Merrie (1985). The Effect of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.12, PP.1-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cacioppo, John T. and Richard E. Petty (1982). The Need for Cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.42, PP.116-131.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chaiken, Shelly (1980). Heuristic versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source versus Message Cues in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.39, No.5, PP.752-766.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chaiken, Shelly, Danny Axsom, and Suzanne Yates (1987). Audience Response as a Heuristic Cue in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.53, P.30.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chaiken, Shelly and Akiva Liberman (1991). Value Conflict and Thought-Induced Attitude Change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.27, P. 203.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chaiken, Shelly and Durairaj Mahesswaran (1991). Promoting Systematic Processing in Low-Motivation Settings: Effect of Incongruent Information on Processing and Judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.61, No.1, PP.13-25.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chaiken, Shelly and Durairaj Maheswaran (1994). Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.66, P.460.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cooper, Joel and Russell H. Fazio (1984). A New Look at Dissonance Theory. Advances in Experimental social Psychology, Vol. 17, PP. 229-266.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Crowley, Ayn E. and Eric R. Spangenberg (1992). Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Attitudes toward Product Categories. Marketing Letters, Vol.3, Nov.3, PP.239-249.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cummings, William H. and M. Venkatesan (1976). Cognitive Dissonance and Consumer Behavior: A Review of the Evidence, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.13, No.3, PP.303-308.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Festinger, Leon (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Ch2. PP.25-42, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Flanagan, John C. (1954). The Critical Incident Technique. Psychological Bulletin, Vol.51, PP.327-351.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hempel, Donald J. (1977). Consumer Satisfaction with the Home Buying Process: Conceptualization and Measurement. The Conceptualization and Measurement of Consumer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction, H. Keith Hunt (ed.) Cambridge. MA: Marketing Science Institute: 7-9.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hirschman, Elizabeth C. and Morris B. Holbrook (1982). Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods, and Propositions. Journal of Marketing, Vol.46, PP.92-101.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hirschman, Elizabeth C. and Morris B. Holbrook (1982). The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.9 (September), PP.132-139.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hoffman, K Douglas, Scott W. Kelley, and Holly M. Rotalsky (1995). Tracking Service Failures and Employee Recovery Efforts. The Journal of Service Marketing, Vol.9, Nov.2, PP.49-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hoffman, K Douglas, Scott W. Kelley, and Beth C. Chung (2003). A CIT Investigation of Servicescape Failure and Associated Recovery Strategies. The Journal of Service Marketing, Vol.17, 4/5, P. 322.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Holbrook, Morris B (1990). Actions and Reactions in the Consumption Experience: the Complementary Roles of Reasons and Emotions in Consumer Behavior. Research in Consumer Behavior, Vol.4, PP.131-163.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Holbrook, Morris B (1999). Introduction to Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research. Routledge, London, PP. 1-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Holbrook, Morris B. and Michela Addis (2001). On the Conceptual Link between Mass Customization and Experiential Consumption: An Explosion of Subjectivity. Journal of Consumer Behavior, Vol.1, PP.50-66.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Holloway, Robert J. (1967). An Experiment on Consumer Dissonance. Journal of Marketing, Vol.31, PP.39-43.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hofstede, Geert (1980). Culture’s Consequences. Ch.5 PP.213-259, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hofstede, Geert (1983). National Cultures in Four Dimensions: A Research-based Theory of Cultural Differences among Nations. Studies of Management and Organization Int., Vol.13, No.1-2, PP.46-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hofstede, Geert (1990). Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Ch.3 PP.49-78, Landon: Mcgraw-Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mattila, Anna S. (2003). The Impact of Cognitive Inertia on Postconsumption Evaluation Process. Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.31. No.2, PP.288-299.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Markus, Hazel Rose and Shinobu Kitayama (1991). Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, Vol.98, No.2, PP.224-253.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McElroy, Todd and John J. Seta (2003). Framing effects: An Analytic-Holistic Perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.39, PP.610-617.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Montgomery, C. and Peter J. Barnes (1993). POSTDIS: A Short Rating Scale for Measuring Postpurchase Dissonance. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, Vol.6, PP.204-216.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Neuwirth, Kurt, Edward Frederick, and Charles Mayo (2002). Person-Effects and Heuristic-Systematic Processing. Communication Research, Vol.29, NO.3 PP.320-359.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oliver, Richard L. (1997). Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. McGraw-Hill Book company, New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oliver, Richard L. and Wayne Desarbo S. (1988). Response Determinants in Satisfaction Judgements. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.14, PP.495-508.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Russo, J. Edward, Margaret G. Meloy, and Victoria Husted Medvec (1998). Predecisional Distortion of Product Information. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.35, PP.438-452.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shiloh Shoshana, Efrat Salton, and Dana Sharabi (2002). Individual Differences in Rational and Intuitive Thinking Styles as Predictors of Heuristic Responses and Framing Effects. Personality and Individual Differences, No.32, PP.415-429.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shostack, Lynn (1977). Breaking Free from Product Marketing, Journal of Marketing, April, PP.73-80.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shostack, Lynn (1985). Planning the Service Encounter, In Czepjel J., M. Solomon and C. Suprenant (eds) The Service Encounter, 1-23. Mass.: Lexington Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Simon, Herbert A. (1976). Administrative Behavior (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Singelis, Theodore M. (1994). The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals. The Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.20, No.5, PP.580-591.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Soloman, Michael R., Carol Surprenant, John A. Czepiel, and Evelyn G. Gutman (1985). A Role Theory Perspective on Dynamic Interactions: The Service Encounter. Journal of Marketing, Vol.49, Winter, PP. 99-111.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Strong, Edward K. (1925). An Interest Test for Personnel Managers. Personnel Journal, Vol.5, PP. 194-204.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sweeney, Jillian C., Douglas Hausknecht, and Geoffrey N. Soutar (2000). Cognitive Dissonance after Purchase: A Multidimensional Scale. Journal of Psychology and Marketing, Vol.17, No.5, PP.369-386.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sweeney, Jillian C. and Geoffrey N. Soutar (2003). Are There Cognitive Dissonance Segments? Australian Journal of Management, Vol.28, No.3, PP.227-249.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Taylor, Steven E., and Fiske S. (1978). Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.11, PP.249-288.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Triandis, Harry C. (1985). Allocentric versus Idiocentric Tendencies: Convergent and Discriminant Validation. Journal of Respective Personality, Vol.19, PP.395-415.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Triandis, Harry C. and Robert Bontempo (1988). Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Self-Ingroup Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.54, P.323.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Triandis, Harry C. (1989). The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts. Psychological Review, Vol.96, lss. 3, P.506.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Triandis, Harry C. (1994). Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications. Ch. 3 P.47, CA: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Triandis, Harry. C. and Eunkook M. Suh (2002). Cultural Influences on Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol.53, PP.133-160.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Watkins, Harry S.and Raymond Liu (1996). Collectivism, Individualism and In-group Membership: Implications for Consumer Complaining Behaviors in Multicultural Contexts. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, Vol.8, PP.69-94.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Webster, Cynthia and D. S. Sundaram (1998). Service Consumption Criticality in Failure Recovery. Journal of Business Research, Vol.41, PP. 153-159.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wellish, Hans (1972). From Information Science to Informatics: A Terminological Investigation. Journal of Librarianship, Vol.4, PP.158-187.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zanna, Mark P. and Gerald N. Sande (1987). The Effects of Collective Actions on the Attitudes of Individual Group Members: A Dissonance Analysis. Social Influence: the Ontario Symposium, Vol.5, PP.151-163.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zenhausern, Robert (1978). Imagery, Cerebral Dominance and Style of Thinking: A Unified Field Model. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, Vol.12, PP.381-384.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zenhausern, Robert and Leslie Nickel (1979). Hemispheric Dominance and Maze Learning. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, Vol. 14(6), PP.435-436.zh_TW