| dc.contributor.advisor | 譚丹琪 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Tan, Dan-chi | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 黃素怡 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Huang, Sue-yi | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 黃素怡 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Huang, Sue-yi | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2002 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 18-Sep-2009 14:07:08 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 18-Sep-2009 14:07:08 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 18-Sep-2009 14:07:08 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0090351033 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35083 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國際經營與貿易研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 90351033 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 91 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 在這個知識經濟的時代，知識管理已經成為企業維持競爭優勢的重要策略，而隨著愈來愈多的台商赴中國大陸投資，如何將在台灣所獲得的經驗和知識成功地移轉給在中國大陸的子公司，這將是影響台商在中國大陸投資成功與否的重要因素。本研究主要探討的是經驗在知識移轉中所扮演的角色，分別針對知識教授者的經驗和知識接受者的經驗來詳加分析。本研究採問卷調查的方式，針對台灣母公司及大陸子公司之間的知識移轉情形來做調查，台灣母公司為知識教授者，而大陸子公司為知識接收者。本研究主要以台灣母公司為研究對象，根據2002-2003電機電子業大陸及東南亞台商採購銷售名錄及在經濟部登記已至中國大陸投資的廠商，共寄出1256份問卷，回收有效樣本為112份，刪除退件及未在大陸投資的樣本後，有效回收率為10.35%，另外加上以大陸子公司為問卷發放對象的32份有效樣本，共計144份樣本進行線性迴歸檢定本研究的假設。本研究發現以下五點：第一，在台灣母公司的經驗方面，當母公司愈是具有產業經驗、在大陸投資的國家經驗、以及在其他國家投資的國際經驗時，知識移轉也就愈容易獲得成功。第二，除了母公司對被移轉的知識需要具有豐富的經驗外，當子公司的內部員工愈是具有工作經驗、子公司愈是具有產業經驗時，將有助於知識移轉績效的提升。第三，外派人員的工作經驗方面對知識移轉績效則無顯著影響。第四，雖然被移轉的知識愈有內隱性、複雜性和系統相依性而難以移轉，但當台灣母公司在其所屬產業愈具有經驗時，則有助於知識移轉的效果。此外，即使被移轉的知識特性是難以移轉的，但若台灣母公司在不同的國家地區有愈多投資的經驗時，也愈有助於知識移轉的效果。第五，雖然被移轉的知識愈有內隱性、複雜性和系統相依性而難以移轉，但是如果大陸子公司在其所屬產業愈具有經驗時，對於知識移轉的效果也是有顯著的提升。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Knowledge management has become important strategy to maintain the core advantages of the firms. Since there are a lot of Taiwanese firms that invest in China, how Taiwanese firms transfer their knowledge to Chinese subsidiaries successfully is a critical issue for these firms. This research explores the role of experience in knowledge transfer between Taiwanese firms and Chinese subsidiaries.Based on a sample of 112 investments made by Taiwanese firms in China, this research found that: (1) Taiwanese firms that had more experiences in their industries, in China or in other countries achieved greater successful in knowledge transfer. (2) Knowledge transfer to Chinese subsidiaries that had more experiences in their industries was more successful. (3) The experiences of expatriates did not affect the knowledge transfer. (4) Knowledge that was tacit, complex and system dependence was difficult to transfer. However, if Taiwanese firms had more experiences in their industries, these experiences lessened the difficulties in transfer such knowledge. Besides, the Taiwanese firms’ experiences of investing in other countries also lessened the difficulties in transfer such knowledge. (5) Similarly, while tacit, complex, and system-dependent knowledge was difficult to transfer, if Chinese subsidiaries have more experiences in their industries, these experiences lessened the difficulties in transfer such knowledge. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………1第一節 研究背景和動機…………………………………………………1第二節 研究目的…………………………………………………………3第三節 研究流程…………………………………………………………4第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………………5第一節 知識的定義………………………………………………………5第二節 影響知識移轉的因素……………………………………………6一、知識移轉的定義………………………………………………………6二、影響知識移轉的因素…………………………………………………6第三節 知識移轉的效果…………………………………………………25第三章 研究設計與研究方法……………………………………………27第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………………27第二節 研究假設…………………………………………………………28一、知識的特性……………………………………………………………28二、教授者的經驗…………………………………………………………31三、接受者的經驗…………………………………………………………33四、教授者經驗對知識移轉績效的干擾…………………………………34五、接受者經驗對知識移轉績效的干擾…………………………………35第三節 研究樣本與資料…………………………………………………36第四節 問卷資料之收……………………………………………………37第五節 研究變數操作性定義和衡量……………………………………38一、自變數…………………………………………………………………38二、依變數…………………………………………………………………39三、控制變數………………………………………………………………40第六節 資料分析方法……………………………………………………42第四章 實證結果分析……………………………………………………43第一節 研究變數之資料分析……………………………………………43一、研究變數之Cronbach’s α信度分析………………………………43二、研究變數之敘述統計分析……………………………………………44三、研究變數之相關係數分析……………………………………………45第二節 知識特性、教授者和接受者經驗對知識移轉績效的影響……47一、在知識移轉的效果方面………………………………………………47二、在子公司的經營績效方面……………………………………………48第三節 知識特性對知識移轉績效受教授者和接受者經驗的干擾影響…51一、在知識移轉的效果方面…………………………………………………51二、在子公司的經營績效方面………………………………………………52第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………………66第一節 研究發現……………………………………………………………66第二節 研究貢獻……………………………………………………………70第三節 研究限制及後續研究方向…………………………………………72參考文獻………………………………………………………………………73一、中文文獻…………………………………………………………………73二、英文文獻…………………………………………………………………74附錄 …………………………………………………………………………79附表A…………………………………………………………………………79附表B…………………………………………………………………………94問卷…………………………………………………………………………96圖目錄圖一 研究流程………………………………………………………………7圖二 研究架構………………………………………………………………………………30表目錄表一 研究變數衡量表………………………………………………………41表二 研究變數之Cronbach’s α信度分析………………………………43表三 研究變數之敘述統計分析……………………………………………45表四 變數之相關係數分析…………………………………………………46表五 知識特性、教授者和接受者經驗對知識移轉效果之迴歸分析……49表六 知識特性、教授者和接受者經驗對子公司經營績效之迴歸分析…50表七之一 內隱性對知識移轉效果受教授者、接受者影響之交互作用分析…54表七之二 複雜性對知識移轉效果受教授者、接受者影響之交互作用分析…56表七之三 系統相依性對知識移轉效果受教授者、接受者影響之交互作用分析…58表八之一 內隱性對子公司經營績效受教授者、接受者影響之交互作用分析…60表八之二 複雜性對子公司經營績效受教授者、接受者影響之交互作用分析…62表八之三 系統相依性對子公司經營績效受教授者、接受者影響之交互作用分析…64表九 迴歸分析結果表………………………………………………………69 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 49735 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 110297 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 53322 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 62615 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 59581 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 249919 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 141037 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 2269344 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 100794 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 68269 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 740658 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090351033 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 知識移轉 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 經驗 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 台商對大陸投資 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | 知識特性、教授者和接受者的經驗對知識移轉績效影響之研究－以台商對中國大陸投資為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、中文文獻 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李文瑞、曹為忠、陳旭銘（2001），台商赴大陸投資進入模式影響因素之研究－中小企業之實證分析，中山管理評論，第九卷第一期：61-86。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林永祥（2001），我國企業國際化生涯發展計劃對派駐大陸人員創業精神影響之研究，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 游雅祺（2001），技術知識特性、知識整合機制與知識移轉績效關係之研究，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 洪如珊（2002），探討多國籍企業組織內部知識移轉機制之移轉效果，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 洪國堅（2002），台灣大陸母子公司間知識移轉與知識吸收之研究，東吳大學企業管理研究所。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許健輝（2002），知識模糊性與知識接受可能性在知識移轉過程中所扮演角色之探討，國立台灣科技大學企業管理研究所。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳忠仁、張慶原（2002），高科技廠商利用策略聯盟進行知識移轉影響因素之研究，科技管理學刊，第七卷第一期：37-60。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 楊君琦（2000），技術移轉互動模式失靈及重塑之研究－以研究機構與中小企業技術合作為例，台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄧秀琴（2002），國際化經驗、創始國際化年齡與企業績效間關係之研究，國立政治大學國際貿易研究所。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡渭水、楊仲偉（2000），台商自大陸技術移轉模式之研究，管理評論，第十九卷第二期：113-137。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 簡俊才（1997），互動機制、吸收能力與訓練對技術移轉績效之影響－以工研院主導之共同研發聯盟為例，國立暨南大學國際企業學系碩士論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、英文文獻 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Antonelli, C. 1999. The evolution of the industrial organization of the production of knowledge. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23: 243-260. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Barkema, H. G., Vermeulen, F. 1998. International expansion through start-up or acquisition: a learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1): 7-26. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Boisot, M., & Griffiths, D. 1999. Possession is nine tenths of the law: Managing a firm’s knowledge base in a regime of weak appropriability. International Journal of Technology Management, 17: 662-676. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bower GH, Hilgard ER. 1981. Theories of Learning. Prentice-Hall:Englewood Cliffs, NJ. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., Nobel, R. Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3): 439-462. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Briscoe, D. R. 1995. International Human Resource Management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Buzzacchi, L., Colombo, M. G., & Mariotti, S. 1995. Technology regimes and innovation in services: The case of the Italian banking industry. Research Policy, 24:151-168. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carpenter, M. A., Sanders, Wm. G., Gregersen, H. B. Bundling human capital with organizational context: the impact of international assignment experience on multinational firm performance and CEO pay. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3): 493-511. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Clark HH, Marshall CR. 1981. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Elements of Discourse Understanding, Aravind J, Webber BL, Sag IA(eds). Cambridge University Press, UK:10-63. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science, 7(5):477-571. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., and Dalton, D. R. 2000. International experience in the executive suite: the path to prosperity? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 515-523. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Daft RL, Lengel RH. 1986. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32: 554-571. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Delios, A., Beamish, P. W. 2001. Survival and profitability: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | the roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5): 1028-1038. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Delios, A., Henisz, W. 2000. Japanese firms’ investment strategies in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 305-323. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Drucker, P. F. 1993. Post-Capitalist Society, N.Y.: Butterworth Heinemann. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Foss, N. J.,Pedersen, T. Transferring knowledge in MNCs: the role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. Journal of International Management, 8: 49-67. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Green, D. H., A. B. Ryans. 1990. Entry strategies and market performance causal modeling of a business simulation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.7, .45-58. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gresov C. 1989. Exploring fit and misfit in multiple contingencies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(3):431-453. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Harrigan, K. R. 1988. Joint ventures and competitive strategy, Strategic Management Journal 1988: 9, 141-158. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Krackhardt D. 1992. The strength of sstrong ties. In Networks and Organizations, Nohria N, Eccles B(eds). Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA:216-239. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kim, L. 1998. Crisis construction and organizational learning: capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Moton. Organization Science, 9: 506-521. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kostova, T. 1999. Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: a contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 308-324. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lane, P. J., Lubatkin, M. 1998. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 461-477. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Luo, Y., M. W. Peng. 1999. Learning to compete in a transition economy: experience, environment, and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2): 269-296. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Madhavan R, Grover R. 1998. From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: new product development as knowledge management. Journal of Marketing, 62(4):1-12 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1): 14-37. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pan, Y. S. Li., D. K. Tse. 1999. The impact of order and model of market entry on profitability and market share, Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1): 81-103. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Parkhe, A. 1993. Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4): 794-829. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ranft, A. L., M. D. Lord. 2002. Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: a grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organization Science, 13(4): 420-441. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Reed, R., R. J. DeFillippi. 1990. Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15: 88-102. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rogers, E. 1980. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Roth, Kendall. 1995. Managing international interdependence:CEO characteristics, Academy of Management Journal. Briarcliff Manor. Feb 1995, 38(1): 200. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Si, S. X., Bruton, G. D. 1999. Knowledge transfer in international joint ventures in transitional economies: the China experience. Academy of Management Executive, 13(1): 83-89. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Simon, B. L. 1999. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management journal, 20: 595-623. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Spence, A. M. 1984. Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance. Econometrica, 52: 102-122. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Subramaniam, M, Rosenthal SR, hatten KJ. 1998. Global new product development: preliminary findings and research propositions. Journal of Managerment Studies, 35(6): 773-796 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Subramaniam, M., Venkatraman, N. 2001. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 359-378. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 27-43. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5): 996-1004. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Van de Ven AH, Delbecq AL. 1974. Atask contingent model of work-unit structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(2): 183-197. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Walsh, J. P., Ungson, G. R. 1991. Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16: 57-91. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Williamson, O. 1985. The economic institutions of Capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press, New York. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Winter, S. 2000. The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 981-996. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Winter, Sidney. 1987. Knowledge and competence as strategic Assets, in David Teece (Ed.). The Competitive Challenge-Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zahra, S. A., George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2):185-203. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zander, U., Kogut, B. 1995. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1): pp76-92. | zh_TW |
