學術產出-學位論文

題名 我國外匯干預與貨幣政策及匯率變動之相關性分析--訊息傳遞管道
作者 蔡宜靜
Tsai, Yi Ching
貢獻者 郭炳伸
蔡宜靜
Tsai, Yi Ching
關鍵詞 外匯干預
訊息管道
向量自我迴歸模型
日期 2005
上傳時間 18-九月-2009 14:10:38 (UTC+8)
摘要 過去文獻探討干預政策影響匯率的管道主要有三個:貨幣管道、資產組合管道與訊息管道。在沖銷干預不改變貨幣基數下,無法透過貨幣管道影響匯率;而過去文獻中對於資產組合管道之實證結果非常不一致,因此,Mussa在1981提出訊息管道認為央行目前的沖銷干預政策可能隱含未來的匯率與貨幣政策進而改變市場參與者的預期而影響目前的匯率水準。

Lewis (1995)使用1985年至1990年美國公開的外匯干預日資料估計一個兩變數的VAR模型,探討干預與貨幣政策之間的關係。同時檢定現在的外匯干預是否隱含未來貨幣政策的改變以及貨幣政策的改變是否引起央行採行逆勢操作的干預政策。Lewis的研究結果顯示,此兩個假設皆成立,表示外匯干預可能預測未來貨幣政策的改變以及貨幣政策的改變也可能使央行進場干預匯率。此外,Lewis也利用衝擊反應函數估計不同貨幣政策變數的衝擊對匯率的影響,發現非借入準備 (nonborrowed reserve) 的衝擊對匯率的影響較M1顯著。

本文參考Lewis的分析架構並且使用台灣資料進行實證分析並進一步估計一個三變數的VAR模型欲探討干預與匯率之直接影響效果。結果發現訊息管道與逆勢操作政策皆存在,且干預對新台幣兌美元的影響較日圓顯著;在貨幣政策變數上,非借入準備對匯率之影響較M1顯著,此結果與Lewis相符。
參考文獻 國外文獻

1.Bernanke, B.S. and Blinder, A.S. (1992), The federal
funds rate and the channels of monetary transmission.
American Economic Review 82, no. 4, 901-921
2.Dominguez, K.M. (1987), Exchange rate efficiency and the
behavior of international asset markets, unpublished
Ph.D. thesis, Yale University
3.Dominguez, K.M. (1990), Market responses to coordinated
central bank intervention, Carnegie-Rochester Conference
Series in Public Policy, 32, 121-63
4.Dominguez, K.M and J.A. Frankel (1993a), Does foreign
exchange intervention work?, Washington, D.C.:Institute
for international economics
5.Dominguez, K.M and J.A. Frankel (1993b), Does foreign
exchange intervention matter? The portfolio effect.
American Economic Review 83, no. 5, 1356-1369
6.Dominguez, K.M and J.A. Frankel (1993c), Foreign exchange
intervention:An empirical assessment, in J.A. Frankel
(ed.), On exchange rates, Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press,
327-345
7.Edison, H. (1992). The effectiveness of central bank
intervention:A survey of the post 1982 literature.
Working paper. Washington, D.C.:Federal Reserve Board of
Governors.
8.Eijffinger, S.C.W. and N.P.D. Gruijters (1991a), On the
short term objectives of daily intervention by the
Deutsche Bundesbank and the Federal Reserve System in the
US dollar/Deutsche mark exchange market., Kredit und
Capital, 24, 50-72
9.Eijffinger, S.C.W. and N.P.D. Gruijters (1991b), On the
effectiveness of daily interventions by the Deutsche
Bundesbank and the Federal Reserve System in US
dollar/Deutsche mark exchange market, in E. Baltensperger
and H.W. Sinn(eds), Exchange regimes and currency union,
London:Macmillan, 131-56
10.Friedman, M. (1953), The case for flexible exchange
rates, in M. Friedman, Essays in Positive Economics,
Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 157-203
11.Humpage, O.F. (1989), On the effectiveness of exchange-
market intervention, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland,
mimeo.
12.Christiano, LJ, Eichenbaum M. and CL Evans (1999),
Monetary policy shocks:what have we learned and to what
end? Handbook of Macroeconomics, Volume 1A, Elsevier
Science B.V. Press
13.Lewis, K. K. (1988), Testing the portfolio balance
model:A multi-lateral approach. Journal of international
Economics 24, nos. 1-2, 109-127
14.Lewis, K. K. (1995), Are foreign exchange intervention
and monetary policy related, and does it really matter?
Journal of Business vol. 68, no. 2, 185-214
15.Mussa, M. L. (1981), The role of official intervention.
Group of Thirty Occasional Papers, no. 6, New York:Group
of Thirty.
16.Rogoff, K. (1984), On the effects of sterilized
intervention:An analysis of weekly data. Journal of
Monetary Economics 14, no. 2, 133-150
17.Sarno, L., Tyalor, M. P. and Frankel, J.A. (2002), The
economics of exchange rates. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York :
Cambridge University Press
國內文獻
1.王泓仁 (2005),台幣匯率對我國經濟金融活動之影響,中央銀行季刊,第
二十七卷,第一期,頁13-45
2.梁發進 (1991),我國貨幣政策反應函數之推估,經濟研究,第三十一期,
頁47-72
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易研究所
93351015
94
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093351015
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 郭炳伸zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 蔡宜靜zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Tsai, Yi Chingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 蔡宜靜zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Tsai, Yi Chingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-九月-2009 14:10:38 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-九月-2009 14:10:38 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-九月-2009 14:10:38 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0093351015en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35105-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國際經營與貿易研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93351015zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 過去文獻探討干預政策影響匯率的管道主要有三個:貨幣管道、資產組合管道與訊息管道。在沖銷干預不改變貨幣基數下,無法透過貨幣管道影響匯率;而過去文獻中對於資產組合管道之實證結果非常不一致,因此,Mussa在1981提出訊息管道認為央行目前的沖銷干預政策可能隱含未來的匯率與貨幣政策進而改變市場參與者的預期而影響目前的匯率水準。

Lewis (1995)使用1985年至1990年美國公開的外匯干預日資料估計一個兩變數的VAR模型,探討干預與貨幣政策之間的關係。同時檢定現在的外匯干預是否隱含未來貨幣政策的改變以及貨幣政策的改變是否引起央行採行逆勢操作的干預政策。Lewis的研究結果顯示,此兩個假設皆成立,表示外匯干預可能預測未來貨幣政策的改變以及貨幣政策的改變也可能使央行進場干預匯率。此外,Lewis也利用衝擊反應函數估計不同貨幣政策變數的衝擊對匯率的影響,發現非借入準備 (nonborrowed reserve) 的衝擊對匯率的影響較M1顯著。

本文參考Lewis的分析架構並且使用台灣資料進行實證分析並進一步估計一個三變數的VAR模型欲探討干預與匯率之直接影響效果。結果發現訊息管道與逆勢操作政策皆存在,且干預對新台幣兌美元的影響較日圓顯著;在貨幣政策變數上,非借入準備對匯率之影響較M1顯著,此結果與Lewis相符。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章、 緒論
1.1 研究背景與動機
1.2 研究架構

第二章、 文獻回顧
2.1 央行外匯干預之動機
2.2 沖銷干預與非沖銷干預
2.3 訊息管道的實證文獻回顧

第三章、 理論模型與計量方法
3.1 匯率決定理論---考慮預期下的資產定價模型
3.2 計量方法
3.2.1 向量自我迴歸模型
3.2.2 最適落後期數選取之準則
3.2.3 衝擊反應函數

第四章、資料來源與實證結果
4.1 資料來源與處理
4.2 實證結果與分析
4.2.1 單根檢定
4.2.2 干預與貨幣政策之相關性分析
4.2.3 貨幣政策與匯率之相關性分析
4.3 三變數之VAR模型估計與衝擊反應函數之分析

第五章 結論

附錄一
附錄二
附錄三
附錄四

參考文獻


圖表目錄

圖次
圖4.1 匯率(新台幣兌美元)對國內貨幣政策之衝擊反應圖
圖4.2 匯率(新台幣兌日元)對國內貨幣政策之衝擊反應圖
圖4.3 國內貨幣政策對匯率(新台幣兌美元)之衝擊反應圖
圖4.4 匯率(新台幣兌美元)對干預之衝擊反應圖

表次
表2.1 中央銀行資產負債表
表4.1 單根檢定結果
表4.2 干預對國內貨幣政策之Granger因果關係檢定結果
表4.3 干預對國內貨幣政策之VAR係數估計結果
表4.4 干預對國內外利差變動之Granger因果關係檢定結果
表4.5 干預對國內外利差變動之VAR係數估計結果
表4.6 國內貨幣政策對干預之Granger因果關係檢定結果
表4.7 國內貨幣政策對干預之VAR係數估計結果
表4.8 國內外利差變動對干預之Granger因果關係檢定結果
表4.9 國內外利差變動對干預之VAR係數估計結果
表4.10匯率(新台幣兌美元)對國內貨幣政策之VAR係數估計結果
表4.11匯率(新台幣兌日元)對國內貨幣政策之VAR係數估計結果
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 62341 bytes-
dc.format.extent 91890 bytes-
dc.format.extent 81914 bytes-
dc.format.extent 76486 bytes-
dc.format.extent 97827 bytes-
dc.format.extent 229555 bytes-
dc.format.extent 134147 bytes-
dc.format.extent 225154 bytes-
dc.format.extent 91866 bytes-
dc.format.extent 184222 bytes-
dc.format.extent 86383 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093351015en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 外匯干預zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 訊息管道zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 向量自我迴歸模型zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 我國外匯干預與貨幣政策及匯率變動之相關性分析--訊息傳遞管道zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 國外文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.Bernanke, B.S. and Blinder, A.S. (1992), The federalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) funds rate and the channels of monetary transmission.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Economic Review 82, no. 4, 901-921zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.Dominguez, K.M. (1987), Exchange rate efficiency and thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) behavior of international asset markets, unpublishedzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ph.D. thesis, Yale Universityzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.Dominguez, K.M. (1990), Market responses to coordinatedzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) central bank intervention, Carnegie-Rochester Conferencezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Series in Public Policy, 32, 121-63zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.Dominguez, K.M and J.A. Frankel (1993a), Does foreignzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) exchange intervention work?, Washington, D.C.:Institutezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) for international economicszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.Dominguez, K.M and J.A. Frankel (1993b), Does foreignzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) exchange intervention matter? The portfolio effect.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Economic Review 83, no. 5, 1356-1369zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.Dominguez, K.M and J.A. Frankel (1993c), Foreign exchangezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) intervention:An empirical assessment, in J.A. Frankelzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (ed.), On exchange rates, Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 327-345zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.Edison, H. (1992). The effectiveness of central bankzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) intervention:A survey of the post 1982 literature.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Working paper. Washington, D.C.:Federal Reserve Board ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Governors.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.Eijffinger, S.C.W. and N.P.D. Gruijters (1991a), On thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) short term objectives of daily intervention by thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Deutsche Bundesbank and the Federal Reserve System in thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) US dollar/Deutsche mark exchange market., Kredit undzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Capital, 24, 50-72zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.Eijffinger, S.C.W. and N.P.D. Gruijters (1991b), On thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) effectiveness of daily interventions by the Deutschezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bundesbank and the Federal Reserve System in USzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) dollar/Deutsche mark exchange market, in E. Baltenspergerzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and H.W. Sinn(eds), Exchange regimes and currency union,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) London:Macmillan, 131-56zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.Friedman, M. (1953), The case for flexible exchangezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) rates, in M. Friedman, Essays in Positive Economics,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 157-203zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.Humpage, O.F. (1989), On the effectiveness of exchange-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) market intervention, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) mimeo.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.Christiano, LJ, Eichenbaum M. and CL Evans (1999),zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Monetary policy shocks:what have we learned and to whatzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) end? Handbook of Macroeconomics, Volume 1A, Elsevierzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Science B.V. Presszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.Lewis, K. K. (1988), Testing the portfolio balancezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) model:A multi-lateral approach. Journal of internationalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economics 24, nos. 1-2, 109-127zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.Lewis, K. K. (1995), Are foreign exchange interventionzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and monetary policy related, and does it really matter?zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal of Business vol. 68, no. 2, 185-214zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.Mussa, M. L. (1981), The role of official intervention.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Group of Thirty Occasional Papers, no. 6, New York:Groupzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) of Thirty.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16.Rogoff, K. (1984), On the effects of sterilizedzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) intervention:An analysis of weekly data. Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Monetary Economics 14, no. 2, 133-150zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.Sarno, L., Tyalor, M. P. and Frankel, J.A. (2002), Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) economics of exchange rates. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York :zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cambridge University Presszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 國內文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.王泓仁 (2005),台幣匯率對我國經濟金融活動之影響,中央銀行季刊,第zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二十七卷,第一期,頁13-45zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.梁發進 (1991),我國貨幣政策反應函數之推估,經濟研究,第三十一期,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 頁47-72zh_TW