學術產出-學位論文

題名 機會性毀約之最適補償
Optimal Remedy for Opportunistic Breach
作者 沈祥玲
Shen, Hsiang-Ling
貢獻者 林柏生<br>溫偉任
<br>
沈祥玲
Shen, Hsiang-Ling
關鍵詞 機會性毀約
只能用於該廠商的投資
Opportunistic Breach
Firm-specific investment
日期 2004
上傳時間 18-九月-2009 14:17:27 (UTC+8)
摘要 本篇論文的研究重心,在於希望能找到一種機制,使老闆不會因為員工年老後生產力衰退而將其開除;老公不會因為老婆生完小孩身材變形而將其拋棄。我們利用一個二工人、一老闆的二期模型,假設工人的生產力會因為年紀的增長而衰退,而且有努力投入的工人衰退的情形更為嚴重,並設存在一個補償c,當老闆要將員工解雇時,必須要支付給員工。我們的研究發現,只要投入的成本i小於某範圍時,無論學習效果的大小、工人為風險中立或趨避、是否假設有限責任下,均存在最佳狀況 ,廠商的行為與社會福利最大下的結果相一致;但若i大於此一範圍時,便不存在最佳狀況,且可能會產生廠商為了自身利益而做出違背社會福利最大狀況下的行為,此時便需要透過政府的介入,使廠商的行為回復到社會福利最大下的狀況。若想要達到我們所希望的員工投入,老闆不將其解雇的情形 ,唯有在契約中明訂員工必須要投入大於一定的範圍且員工的議價能力很強下,才能保護員工不會被廠商任意的解雇。在此契約下,老闆只賺得正常利潤,而員工則成為剩餘價值的要求者(residual claimant)。
參考文獻 Anderhub, Vital, K&ouml;nigstein, Manfred, and K&uuml;bler, Dorothea , “Long-term Work
Contracts versus Sequential Spot Markets: Experimental Evidence on Firm-Specific Investment”, Labour Economics 10 (November, 2002):407-425
Azfar, Omar and Danninger Stephan, “Profit-Sharing, Employment Stability, and
Wage Growth”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review 54, no. 3 (April 2001)
Becker, Elizabeth and Lindsay, Cotton M., “Sex Differences in Tenure Profiles:
Effects of Shared Firm-Specific Investment”, Journal of Labor Economics 12,
no.1 (January, 1994):98-118
Becker, Gary S., “A Theory of Marriage: Part 1”, 81 Journal of Political (1973)
Economy: 813-846.
Cohen, Lloyd. “Marriage, Divorce, and Quasi rents; or, I Gave Him the Best Years of
My Life” Journal of Legal Studies XVI (June, 1987)
Dnes, Antony W. ”Marriage Contracts”, Associate Dean (Research), University of
Hertfordshire, England. (1999)
Friedman, David D. “Law’s order:what economics has to do with law and why it
matters” Princeton University Press, (2000)
Kahn, Charles and Huberman, Gur, “Two-Sided Uncertainty and Up-or-Out
Contracts”, Journal of Labor Economics 6, no. 4 (October, 1988):423-444
Laffont, Jean-Jacques and Martimort David ,“The Theory of Incentives--The
principle-agent model”, Princeton University Press(2002)
Mori, Pier Angelo, “Task Shifts vs. Termination as Devices for Eliciting Optimal
Effort Supply”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 7, no. 1 (Spring
1998):33-65
郭春松,「成年中期外遇問題之初探」,網路社會學通訊期刊(第四十二期),發行單位:南華大學社會學研究所(2004/11/15)
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易研究所
92351014
93
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923510141
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 林柏生<br>溫偉任zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor <br>en_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 沈祥玲zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Shen, Hsiang-Lingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 沈祥玲zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Shen, Hsiang-Lingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-九月-2009 14:17:27 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-九月-2009 14:17:27 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-九月-2009 14:17:27 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0923510141en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35152-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國際經營與貿易研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92351014zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本篇論文的研究重心,在於希望能找到一種機制,使老闆不會因為員工年老後生產力衰退而將其開除;老公不會因為老婆生完小孩身材變形而將其拋棄。我們利用一個二工人、一老闆的二期模型,假設工人的生產力會因為年紀的增長而衰退,而且有努力投入的工人衰退的情形更為嚴重,並設存在一個補償c,當老闆要將員工解雇時,必須要支付給員工。我們的研究發現,只要投入的成本i小於某範圍時,無論學習效果的大小、工人為風險中立或趨避、是否假設有限責任下,均存在最佳狀況 ,廠商的行為與社會福利最大下的結果相一致;但若i大於此一範圍時,便不存在最佳狀況,且可能會產生廠商為了自身利益而做出違背社會福利最大狀況下的行為,此時便需要透過政府的介入,使廠商的行為回復到社會福利最大下的狀況。若想要達到我們所希望的員工投入,老闆不將其解雇的情形 ,唯有在契約中明訂員工必須要投入大於一定的範圍且員工的議價能力很強下,才能保護員工不會被廠商任意的解雇。在此契約下,老闆只賺得正常利潤,而員工則成為剩餘價值的要求者(residual claimant)。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 諸論...........................................01
第一節 定義機會性毀約................................01
第二節 研究動機與目的................................01
第三節 研究架構與內容................................03
第二章 參考文獻........................................04
第一節 婚姻巿場相關文獻..............................04
第二節 勞動巿場相關文獻..............................05
第三章 研究方法.......................................08
第一節 基本假設......................................08
第二節 模型I—工人為風險中立.........................11
第三節 模型I—工人為風險趨避.........................30
第四節 模型II—工人為風險中立.........................47
第五節 模型II—工人為風險趨避.........................59
第六節 簡化模型.......................................71
第七節 分析...........................................72
第四章 結論與建議......................................77
第一節 研究結論......................................77
第二節 後續研究建議..................................79
參考文獻................................................80
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 46359 bytes-
dc.format.extent 88042 bytes-
dc.format.extent 79201 bytes-
dc.format.extent 124290 bytes-
dc.format.extent 128363 bytes-
dc.format.extent 857237 bytes-
dc.format.extent 157870 bytes-
dc.format.extent 65723 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923510141en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 機會性毀約zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 只能用於該廠商的投資zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Opportunistic Breachen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Firm-specific investmenten_US
dc.title (題名) 機會性毀約之最適補償zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Optimal Remedy for Opportunistic Breachen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anderhub, Vital, K&ouml;nigstein, Manfred, and K&uuml;bler, Dorothea , “Long-term Workzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Contracts versus Sequential Spot Markets: Experimental Evidence on Firm-Specific Investment”, Labour Economics 10 (November, 2002):407-425zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Azfar, Omar and Danninger Stephan, “Profit-Sharing, Employment Stability, andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wage Growth”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review 54, no. 3 (April 2001)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Becker, Elizabeth and Lindsay, Cotton M., “Sex Differences in Tenure Profiles:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Effects of Shared Firm-Specific Investment”, Journal of Labor Economics 12,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) no.1 (January, 1994):98-118zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Becker, Gary S., “A Theory of Marriage: Part 1”, 81 Journal of Political (1973)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economy: 813-846.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cohen, Lloyd. “Marriage, Divorce, and Quasi rents; or, I Gave Him the Best Years ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) My Life” Journal of Legal Studies XVI (June, 1987)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dnes, Antony W. ”Marriage Contracts”, Associate Dean (Research), University ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hertfordshire, England. (1999)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Friedman, David D. “Law’s order:what economics has to do with law and why itzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) matters” Princeton University Press, (2000)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kahn, Charles and Huberman, Gur, “Two-Sided Uncertainty and Up-or-Outzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Contracts”, Journal of Labor Economics 6, no. 4 (October, 1988):423-444zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Laffont, Jean-Jacques and Martimort David ,“The Theory of Incentives--Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) principle-agent model”, Princeton University Press(2002)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mori, Pier Angelo, “Task Shifts vs. Termination as Devices for Eliciting Optimalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Effort Supply”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 7, no. 1 (Springzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1998):33-65zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭春松,「成年中期外遇問題之初探」,網路社會學通訊期刊(第四十二期),發行單位:南華大學社會學研究所(2004/11/15)zh_TW