學術產出-學位論文

題名 企業社會責任與企業財務績效、高階經理人薪酬結構之關聯性分析
作者 陳姿伶
貢獻者 屠美亞
陳姿伶
關鍵詞 企業社會責任
財務績效
高階經理人薪酬結構
CSR
financial performance
executive compensation
日期 2008
上傳時間 18-九月-2009 19:56:11 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究主要探討,企業社會責任這個議題,是否能跳脫傳統從企業道德﹝business ethics﹞的角度,以更實用性的思考,結合企業所最為關心的經濟利益考量,成功地說服企業用更主動積極的方式從事與企業社會責任相關的決策與投資活動。為了達成該研究目的,本研究採用由道瓊永續性北美指數2005-2007連續三年評選入榜的企業為研究標的,觀測其財務績效相關指標是否明顯優於其餘未入榜的企業。而在現今許多所有權與經營權分離的企業當中,如何成功地降低待理問題,使高階經理人能將組織長遠永續發展的目標結合自身利益,為股東與其他利害關係人帶來最大的利益是本研究第二個探討的議題。藉由分析S&P execucomp資料庫2005-2007年的資料,本研究從高階經理人的年度薪酬資料,去了解企業社會責任執行佳的企業是否在薪酬結構的設計上有不同的設計。資料分析結果顯示,連續三年評選進入道瓊永續性北美指數的企業,其公司成長性顯著優於未入榜的企業;而主要與企業短期績效表現連動的薪酬制度──紅利,其所佔比例越高,將誘使高階經理人挪用於其他能創造短期財務績效的投資活動,長遠來看,將不利於公司企業社會責任活動的執行與發展。
The goal of this study is to examine whether business performance is affected by the adoption of practice included under the term of “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).”To achieve this goal, the relation between CSR and some accounting or market indicators are analyzed and the existence of significant difference in performance indicators between North American firms that have adopt CSR and others that have not is also examined. Besides, this study takes a further step to explore the extent to which Boards use executive compensation to incite firms to act in accordance with social and environmental objectives. The Dow Jones Sustainability Index- North America is used for distinguishing firms that constantly comply with CSR practice for 3 years (2005-2007) from the rest. Empirical analysis supports the conclusion that differences in performance exist between firms that belong to the DJSI-North America (doing CSR good) and the rest (not doing CSR good). Moreover, the bonus of executive compensation has significant negative relationship with CSR. This finding implies that the compensation linking to short-term performance provides no incentives to executives for doing CSR which has long-term benefit for firms. This in turn suggests that executive compensation can be an effective tool in aligning executives’ welfare with that of the “common good”, which results in more socially responsible firms.
參考文獻 郭方昇 (2000),「企業社會責任對企業財務績效與投資組合績效之影響性分 析」,私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
康峰菁 (2003),「企業社會責任、財務績效與盈餘管理之國際實證研究」,國 立台北大學合作經濟學所博士論文。
林益宏 (2003) ,「企業社會責任、財務績效與研發支出之關聯性分析」,國立 台北大學合作經濟學所碩士論文。
林雅惠 (2005),「台灣企業社會責任發展之現況研究」,國立台北科技大學環 境規劃與管理研究所碩士論文。
柯如欣 (2007) ,「從利害關係人之意願與行為探討企業社會責任與企業財務績 效間之關聯性─國際實證研究」,國立台北大學合作經濟學所碩士論文。
蔡智全 (2007) ,「企業社會責任的聲譽效果與價值對公司財務績效的影響」, 私立元智大學財經所碩士論文。
宋智皓 (2006) ,「董監酬勞與公司治理之關聯性研究」,國立政治大學會計研 究所碩士論文。
王濟川、郭志剛 (2008),《Logistic 迴歸模型-方法與應用》,五南文化事業機 構。
Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 1992. The balance scorecard-measures that drive
performance. Harvard Business Review 70 (January/February ):71-79.
Lewellen, Lorderer and K. Martin. 1987. Executive compensation contracts and
executive incentive problems: An empirical analysis. Journal of
Accounting and Economics 9: 287-310
Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial
behavior agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial and
Economics 3: 305-360.
Meyer JW, Rowan B. (1977), “Institutionalized organizations:formal structure as myth and ceremony." American Journal of Sociology , 83, 340-363.
Thilo Goodall (2006), “Measuring Corporate Sustainability Performance and Its Impact on Corporate Financial Performance,” Applied Research in Environmental Economics, 51-74.
Juan Pineiro Chousa and Noelia Romero Castro (2006), “Integrating Sustainability Into Traditional Financial Analysis ,” Sustainability Accounting and Reporting, 83-108.
M. Victoria Lo´pez, Arminda Garcia and Lazaro Rodriguez (2007), “Sustainable Development and Corporate Performance:A Study Based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index, ” Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 285-300.
Edward Nelling A Elizabeth Webb (2008), “Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: the "virtuous circle" ,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32, 285-300.
Peter A. Stanwick and Sarah D Stanwick, (1998), “ The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance:An Empirical Examination ,” Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 195-204.
Manuel Castelo Branco and Lu´cia Lima Rodrigues, (2006), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives ,” Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 111-132.
Scott Browne, (2003), “ Determinants of Corporate Social Performance:An Exploratory Investigation of Top Management Teams, CEO Compensation, And CEO Power,” Dissertation of Nova Southeast University.
The Sustainability Yearbook, 2006-2008, SAM Sustainable Asset Management
Smith, C. W. and R. L. Watts. 1992. The investment opportunity set and
corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of
Financial Economics 32: 263-292
Stuart L,Hart and Mark B. Milstein (2003), “Creating Sustainable Value ,” Academy of Management Executive, 17, 56-69.
Sloan, R. G.. 1996. Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash
flows about future earnings?. The Accounting Review 71(July): 289-315.
Michael E. Porter and Mark R. Kramer (2006), “Strategy & Society:The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility ,” Harvard Business Review, December 2006 , 2-15.
Pratima Bansal (2005), “Evolving Sustainably:A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Sustainable Development,” Strategic Management Journal, 26, 197-218.
Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman,1978,Towards a positive theory of the
determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review 53:
112-134.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所
96355032
97
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096355032
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 屠美亞zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 陳姿伶zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 陳姿伶zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-九月-2009 19:56:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-九月-2009 19:56:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-九月-2009 19:56:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0096355032en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36849-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 企業管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96355032zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究主要探討,企業社會責任這個議題,是否能跳脫傳統從企業道德﹝business ethics﹞的角度,以更實用性的思考,結合企業所最為關心的經濟利益考量,成功地說服企業用更主動積極的方式從事與企業社會責任相關的決策與投資活動。為了達成該研究目的,本研究採用由道瓊永續性北美指數2005-2007連續三年評選入榜的企業為研究標的,觀測其財務績效相關指標是否明顯優於其餘未入榜的企業。而在現今許多所有權與經營權分離的企業當中,如何成功地降低待理問題,使高階經理人能將組織長遠永續發展的目標結合自身利益,為股東與其他利害關係人帶來最大的利益是本研究第二個探討的議題。藉由分析S&P execucomp資料庫2005-2007年的資料,本研究從高階經理人的年度薪酬資料,去了解企業社會責任執行佳的企業是否在薪酬結構的設計上有不同的設計。資料分析結果顯示,連續三年評選進入道瓊永續性北美指數的企業,其公司成長性顯著優於未入榜的企業;而主要與企業短期績效表現連動的薪酬制度──紅利,其所佔比例越高,將誘使高階經理人挪用於其他能創造短期財務績效的投資活動,長遠來看,將不利於公司企業社會責任活動的執行與發展。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The goal of this study is to examine whether business performance is affected by the adoption of practice included under the term of “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).”To achieve this goal, the relation between CSR and some accounting or market indicators are analyzed and the existence of significant difference in performance indicators between North American firms that have adopt CSR and others that have not is also examined. Besides, this study takes a further step to explore the extent to which Boards use executive compensation to incite firms to act in accordance with social and environmental objectives. The Dow Jones Sustainability Index- North America is used for distinguishing firms that constantly comply with CSR practice for 3 years (2005-2007) from the rest. Empirical analysis supports the conclusion that differences in performance exist between firms that belong to the DJSI-North America (doing CSR good) and the rest (not doing CSR good). Moreover, the bonus of executive compensation has significant negative relationship with CSR. This finding implies that the compensation linking to short-term performance provides no incentives to executives for doing CSR which has long-term benefit for firms. This in turn suggests that executive compensation can be an effective tool in aligning executives’ welfare with that of the “common good”, which results in more socially responsible firms.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目次 1
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究架構 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 企業社會責任發展 5
第二節 企業社會責任與企業財務績效表現 8
第三節 代理問題與薪酬結構 15
第四節 高階經理人薪酬結構與企業社會責任表現 18
第三章 研究方法 19
第一節 研究假說 19
第二節 變數定義與測試模型 21
第三節 資料來源與樣本篩選 25
第四節 實證方法 27
第四章 實證研究 29
第一節 敘述性統計量分析 29
第二節 邏輯斯迴歸分析 33
第五章 結論與建議 41
第一節 研究結論 41
第二節 研究限制 44
第三節 研究建議 45
參考文獻 46
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 96388 bytes-
dc.format.extent 159337 bytes-
dc.format.extent 109796 bytes-
dc.format.extent 210334 bytes-
dc.format.extent 291216 bytes-
dc.format.extent 236611 bytes-
dc.format.extent 219399 bytes-
dc.format.extent 203314 bytes-
dc.format.extent 161003 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096355032en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 企業社會責任zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 財務績效zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 高階經理人薪酬結構zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) CSRen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) financial performanceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) executive compensationen_US
dc.title (題名) 企業社會責任與企業財務績效、高階經理人薪酬結構之關聯性分析zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭方昇 (2000),「企業社會責任對企業財務績效與投資組合績效之影響性分 析」,私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 康峰菁 (2003),「企業社會責任、財務績效與盈餘管理之國際實證研究」,國 立台北大學合作經濟學所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林益宏 (2003) ,「企業社會責任、財務績效與研發支出之關聯性分析」,國立 台北大學合作經濟學所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林雅惠 (2005),「台灣企業社會責任發展之現況研究」,國立台北科技大學環 境規劃與管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 柯如欣 (2007) ,「從利害關係人之意願與行為探討企業社會責任與企業財務績 效間之關聯性─國際實證研究」,國立台北大學合作經濟學所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡智全 (2007) ,「企業社會責任的聲譽效果與價值對公司財務績效的影響」, 私立元智大學財經所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 宋智皓 (2006) ,「董監酬勞與公司治理之關聯性研究」,國立政治大學會計研 究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王濟川、郭志剛 (2008),《Logistic 迴歸模型-方法與應用》,五南文化事業機 構。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. 1992. The balance scorecard-measures that drivezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) performance. Harvard Business Review 70 (January/February ):71-79.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lewellen, Lorderer and K. Martin. 1987. Executive compensation contracts andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) executive incentive problems: An empirical analysis. Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Accounting and Economics 9: 287-310zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerialzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) behavior agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economics 3: 305-360.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Meyer JW, Rowan B. (1977), “Institutionalized organizations:formal structure as myth and ceremony." American Journal of Sociology , 83, 340-363.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thilo Goodall (2006), “Measuring Corporate Sustainability Performance and Its Impact on Corporate Financial Performance,” Applied Research in Environmental Economics, 51-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Juan Pineiro Chousa and Noelia Romero Castro (2006), “Integrating Sustainability Into Traditional Financial Analysis ,” Sustainability Accounting and Reporting, 83-108.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) M. Victoria Lo´pez, Arminda Garcia and Lazaro Rodriguez (2007), “Sustainable Development and Corporate Performance:A Study Based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index, ” Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 285-300.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Edward Nelling A Elizabeth Webb (2008), “Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: the "virtuous circle" ,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32, 285-300.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peter A. Stanwick and Sarah D Stanwick, (1998), “ The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance:An Empirical Examination ,” Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 195-204.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Manuel Castelo Branco and Lu´cia Lima Rodrigues, (2006), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives ,” Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 111-132.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scott Browne, (2003), “ Determinants of Corporate Social Performance:An Exploratory Investigation of Top Management Teams, CEO Compensation, And CEO Power,” Dissertation of Nova Southeast University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) The Sustainability Yearbook, 2006-2008, SAM Sustainable Asset Managementzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, C. W. and R. L. Watts. 1992. The investment opportunity set andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Financial Economics 32: 263-292zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stuart L,Hart and Mark B. Milstein (2003), “Creating Sustainable Value ,” Academy of Management Executive, 17, 56-69.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sloan, R. G.. 1996. Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cashzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) flows about future earnings?. The Accounting Review 71(July): 289-315.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Michael E. Porter and Mark R. Kramer (2006), “Strategy & Society:The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility ,” Harvard Business Review, December 2006 , 2-15.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pratima Bansal (2005), “Evolving Sustainably:A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Sustainable Development,” Strategic Management Journal, 26, 197-218.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman,1978,Towards a positive theory of thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review 53:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 112-134.zh_TW