學術產出-學位論文

題名 台灣綜合高中學生字彙學習策略之研究
An Exploratory Study on Vocabulary Learning Strategies by Comprehensive High School Students in Taiwan
作者 董佳雯
Tung, Chia-wen
貢獻者 廖昭文
Liaw, Chao-wen
董佳雯
Tung, Chia-wen
關鍵詞 綜合高中
字彙
字彙學習策略
comprehensive high school
vocabulary
vocabulary learning strategies
日期 2006
上傳時間 19-九月-2009 13:06:11 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究旨在探討台灣綜合高中學生學習字彙時所運用的字彙學習策略,研究問題主要探討:學術學程及職業學程的學生在學習字彙時是否運用不同的字彙學習策略並找出其較常和較少使用之字彙學習策略,以及字彙學習高成就者和低成就者字彙學習策略之差異。藉此俾能提供英文老師幫助不同學程、成就的學生運用字彙學習策略,以期達到更佳的字彙學習成效。
     本研究抽樣台北縣、市8所綜合高中共648位高三學生為調查對象,研究工具為字彙學習策略問卷與字彙能力測驗。分析方法主要採量化分析,包括獨立樣本t檢定、描述性統計、斯皮爾曼等級相關,本研究結果發現如下:
     一、學術學程及職業學程的學生之字彙學習策略使用頻率具有顯著差異,學術學程的學生比職業學程的學生運用較多決定策略及記憶策略。
     二、學術學程及職業學程的學生之字彙學習策略使用頻率排序相同,在發現字義部份依序為決定策略、社會策略;在鞏固字義部份依序為認知策略、記憶策略、後設認知策略、社會策略。
     三、字彙學習高成就者和低成就者之字彙學習策略使用頻率具有顯著差異,高成就者比低成就者運用較多字彙學習策略。
     最後,本文依據研究結果,提出老師英語教學上之應用及未來研究之建議。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the vocabulary learning strategies used by comprehensive high school students in Taiwan. There were three questions focusing on the differences of use frequency of vocabulary learning strategies between academic-oriented and vocational-oriented students, the strategy use rank between these two groups of students, as well as the relation between vocabulary achievement and vocabulary learning strategy use frequency.
     A total of 648 students in Taipei City and Taipei County participated in the study. A vocabulary learning strategy questionnaire and a vocabulary achievement test were applied as instruments to obtain the data needed. Data from the students’ responses were computed and analyzed by means of independent-sample t-tests, descriptive statistics, and Spearman’s rank correlation.
     The findings of this study were summarized as follows.
     1.There was a significant difference in vocabulary learning strategy use frequency between academic-oriented students and vocational-oriented students. The former applied more determination strategies to discover the meaning of a new word, and more memory strategies to consolidate the words encountered.
     2.The ranking order of use frequency in vocabulary learning strategies by academic-oriented and vocational-oriented students was identical. In Part 1 (discovering the meaning of a new word), determination strategies were used most frequently, then followed by social strategies. In part 2 (consolidating the words encountered), cognitive strategies were used most frequently, followed by memory strategies, metacognitive strategies, and the last, social strategies.
     3.There was a significant difference between good learners and poor learners in vocabulary learning strategy use frequency. Good learners applied more vocabulary learning strategies than poor learners to know an English word’s meaning.
     Based on the above results, some pedagogical implications for English teachers were developed and suggestions for future research were provided at the end of the study.
參考文獻 Ahmed, M. O. (1989). Vocabulary learning strategies. In P. Meara (Ed.), Beyond words (pp. 3-14). London: CILT.
Angelis, P. (1974). Listening comprehension and error analysis. In G. Nickel (Ed.), Applied contrastive linguistics. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.
Baddeley, A. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Bialystok, E. (1978). A Theoretical Model of Second Language Learning. Language Learning, 28(1), 69-83.
Bialystok, E. (1979). The Role of Conscious Strategies in Second Language Proficiency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 35, 372-394.
Bremner, S. (1999) Language learning strategies and language proficiency: Investigating the relationship in Hong Kong. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55(4), 490-514.
Brown, C., & M. E. Payne (1994). Five Essential Steps or Processes in Vocabulary Learning. Paper presented at the TESOL 1994, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Cameron, L (2001). Teaching Languages to Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Catalan, R. M. J. (2003). Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 54-77.
Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.) (1991). Language teaching approaches: An overview. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (2nd ed.) Boston: Heinle & Heinele Publishers.
Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 227-249.
Chamot, A. U., & O`Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA Handbook: How to Implement the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Chen, B. C. (1999). Discrepancy of vocabulary learning strategies between high achievers and low achievers at a junior college in Taiwan. The proceedings of the 14th national conference on technical and vocational education (pp. 223-231). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.
Chen, H. J. (1998). Second language learning vocabulary strategies: A preliminary investigation of Chinese EFL learners. The proceedings of the 6th international symposium on English teaching (pp. 219-230). Taipei: Crane.
Chen, L. C. (2003). The effects of “word meanings inferred from context” instruction in English vocabulary learning of vocational high school students: A case study. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (Eds.). (1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Cohen, A. D. (2001). The Learner’s Side of Foreign LanguageLearning: Where do Styles, Strategies, and Tasks Meet? Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.
Cook, L. K., & Mayer. R. E. (1983). Reading strategies training for meaningful learning from prose. In M. Pressley and J. Levin (Eds) Cognitive strategy research. New York: Springer Verlag.
DeCarrico, J. S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In Celces-Murcia M. (Ed.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 285-299). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Duffy, Gerald G.. (2003) Explaining reading: A resource for teaching concepts, skills, and strategies (pp. 57-78). New York: Guilford Press.
Ebel, R. L. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.
Fan, Y. M. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 222-241.
Gorman, T. P. (1979). Teaching reading at the advanced level. In M. Celce-Murcia & L. McIntosh (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 154-162). Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.
Gung Hsiao, T. Y. (1997). An exploratory study of language learning strategies by learners of English as a foreign language. The proceedings of the fourteenth conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp.57-78). Taipei: Crane.
Gu, Y. (2002). Gender, academic major, and vocabulary learning strategies of Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 33(1), 35-54.
Gu, Y. (2005). Vocabulary learning strategies in the Chinese context. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish.
Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language learning, 46(4), 643-679.
Gung, W. C. (2004). An exploratory study on vocabulary learning strategies by Taiwanese EFL elementary school students. Unpublished Master Degree Thesis, National Taipei Teachers College.
Huang, C. C. (2001). An investigation of ESP students’ vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension. The proceedings of the tenth conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp.436-445). Taipei: Crane.
Huang, T. L. (1997). A study of word analysis and inference on vocabulary teaching and learning. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.
Judd, E. L. (1978). Vocabulary teaching and TESOL: A need for reevaluation of existing assumptions. TESOL Quarterly, 12(1), 71-76.
Kelly, P. (1991). Lexical ignorance: The main obstacle to listening comprehension with advanced foreign language teachers. IRAL, 29(2), 135-149.
Knight, S. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students with different verbal abilities. The modern Language Journal, 78, 285-299.
Kojic-Sabo, I., & Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Students’ approaches to vocabulary learning and their relationship to success. Modern Language Journal, 83, 176-192.
Kudo, Y. (1999). L2 vocabulary learning strategies (NFLRC NetWork #14) [HTML
document]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Retrieved [September 25, 2005] from the World Wide Web: http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW14/
Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In J. L. Arnaud & H. Bejoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126-132). London: MacMillan.
Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don’t know, words you think you know, and words you can’t guess. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 20-34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Laufer, B. Shmueli, K. (1997) Memorizing new words: Does teaching have anything to do with it? RELC Journal, 28, 89-108
Lawson, M. J., & Hogben, D. (1996). The vocabulary learning strategies of foreign language students. Language Learning, 46, 101-135.
Lin, L. (2001). Taiwanese children’s EFL vocabulary learning strategies. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chinhua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Maiguashca, R. U. (1993). Teaching and learning vocabulary in a second language: Past, present, and future directions. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50 (1), 83-100.
McCarthy, J. (1989). Artificial Intelligence, Logic and Formalizing Common Sense. In Thomason, R., (Ed.), Philosophical Logic and Artificial Intelligence. Klüver Academic.
Ministry of Education, Taiwan. (2007). 綜合高中資訊網 [HTML document] Retrieved [May 3, 2005] from the World Wide Web: http://page.phsh.tyc.edu.tw/com/index¬_1.htm
Mohamed A.E. (1996). Language Learning Strategies employed by Secondary School Students Learning English as a Foreign Language in Malaysia. Doctoral Dissertation. School of Education, University of Leeds.
Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H. H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, The Modern Language Center.
Nation, I. S. P. (1982). Beginning to learn foreign vocabulary: A review of the research. RELC Journal, 13, 14-36.
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Heinle and Heinle.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Küpper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985a). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21-46.
O`Malley, J. M. (1987). The effects of training in the use of learning strategies on learning English as a second language. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Ed.). Learner strategies in language learning (pp.133-144). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L. & Crookall, D. (1989). Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings, and instructional issues. Modern Language Journal, 73, 404-419.
Oxford R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Oxford, R. L. (1992/1993). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. TESOL Journal, 2 (2), 18-22
Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M.E. (1995). Adults learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System, 23, 359-386.
Oxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 291-300.
Pimsleur, P. (1967). A memory schedule. The Modern Language Journal, 51, 73-75.
Politzer, R. L., & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviors and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESO Quarterly, 19, 103-123.
Raimes, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 229-258.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77-89.
Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41-51.
Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 15-30). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Sanaoui, R. (1995). Adult learners’ approaches to learning vocabulary in second languages. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 15-28.
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.) Vocabulary: description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 199-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 304-318.
Stoffer, I. (1995). University foreign language students’ choice of vocabulary learning strategies as related to individual difference variables. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Alabama.
Su, M. L. (2003). Comparison of English learning attitudes, motivation and strategies between vocational-oriented students and college-oriented students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaoshiung Normal University, Kaoshiung, Taiwan.
Sunderland, J. (2000). Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education. Language Teaching, 33, 203-223.
Sy, B. M. (1996). Sex Differences and Language Learning Strategies. In T. H. Nash, J. W. Chiu, & R. Schulte (Eds.), Papers from the Eleventh Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp.19-51). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 143-163.
Tsuchida, M. (2002). The learning strategies: Helping students learn how to learn. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED463655)
Wang, Y. H. (2004). An investigation into vocabulary learning strategies used by senior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wenden, A. L. (1987). Conceptual background and utility. In A.L. Wenden, & J. Rubins (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp.3-13). London: Prentice Hall International.
Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching (p. 111). London: Edward Arnold.
Wu, R. T. Y. (1996). Comprehensive high school: An effective way to integrate academic and vocational education in Taiwan, Republic of China. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED404545)
Zheng, H. H.(2002)。《高中英文參考詞彙表之編輯方法及原則》。台北:大學入學考試中心。
Zimmerman, C. B. (1997). Do reading and interactive vocabulary study make a difference? An empirical study. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (1), 121-140.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
91951013
95
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0919510133
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 廖昭文zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Liaw, Chao-wenen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 董佳雯zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Tung, Chia-wenen_US
dc.creator (作者) 董佳雯zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Tung, Chia-wenen_US
dc.date (日期) 2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned 19-九月-2009 13:06:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 19-九月-2009 13:06:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 19-九月-2009 13:06:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0919510133en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37301-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91951013zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在探討台灣綜合高中學生學習字彙時所運用的字彙學習策略,研究問題主要探討:學術學程及職業學程的學生在學習字彙時是否運用不同的字彙學習策略並找出其較常和較少使用之字彙學習策略,以及字彙學習高成就者和低成就者字彙學習策略之差異。藉此俾能提供英文老師幫助不同學程、成就的學生運用字彙學習策略,以期達到更佳的字彙學習成效。
     本研究抽樣台北縣、市8所綜合高中共648位高三學生為調查對象,研究工具為字彙學習策略問卷與字彙能力測驗。分析方法主要採量化分析,包括獨立樣本t檢定、描述性統計、斯皮爾曼等級相關,本研究結果發現如下:
     一、學術學程及職業學程的學生之字彙學習策略使用頻率具有顯著差異,學術學程的學生比職業學程的學生運用較多決定策略及記憶策略。
     二、學術學程及職業學程的學生之字彙學習策略使用頻率排序相同,在發現字義部份依序為決定策略、社會策略;在鞏固字義部份依序為認知策略、記憶策略、後設認知策略、社會策略。
     三、字彙學習高成就者和低成就者之字彙學習策略使用頻率具有顯著差異,高成就者比低成就者運用較多字彙學習策略。
     最後,本文依據研究結果,提出老師英語教學上之應用及未來研究之建議。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of this study was to investigate the vocabulary learning strategies used by comprehensive high school students in Taiwan. There were three questions focusing on the differences of use frequency of vocabulary learning strategies between academic-oriented and vocational-oriented students, the strategy use rank between these two groups of students, as well as the relation between vocabulary achievement and vocabulary learning strategy use frequency.
     A total of 648 students in Taipei City and Taipei County participated in the study. A vocabulary learning strategy questionnaire and a vocabulary achievement test were applied as instruments to obtain the data needed. Data from the students’ responses were computed and analyzed by means of independent-sample t-tests, descriptive statistics, and Spearman’s rank correlation.
     The findings of this study were summarized as follows.
     1.There was a significant difference in vocabulary learning strategy use frequency between academic-oriented students and vocational-oriented students. The former applied more determination strategies to discover the meaning of a new word, and more memory strategies to consolidate the words encountered.
     2.The ranking order of use frequency in vocabulary learning strategies by academic-oriented and vocational-oriented students was identical. In Part 1 (discovering the meaning of a new word), determination strategies were used most frequently, then followed by social strategies. In part 2 (consolidating the words encountered), cognitive strategies were used most frequently, followed by memory strategies, metacognitive strategies, and the last, social strategies.
     3.There was a significant difference between good learners and poor learners in vocabulary learning strategy use frequency. Good learners applied more vocabulary learning strategies than poor learners to know an English word’s meaning.
     Based on the above results, some pedagogical implications for English teachers were developed and suggestions for future research were provided at the end of the study.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Page
     ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………….... iv
     TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………….... v
     LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………… ix
     LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………..... xii
     CHINESE ABSTRACT………………………………………………………... xiii
     ENGLISH ABSTRACT………………………………………………………... xiv
     
     CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………..... 1
     1.1 Background………………………………………………………………….. 1
     1.2 Motivation…………………………………………………………………… 2
     1.3 Purposes of the Study…………………………………………………..... 4
     1.4 Research Questions………………………………………………………...... 4
     1.5 Significance of the Study……………………………………………...... 5
     1.6 Definition of Terms………………………………………………………...... 5
     
     CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW…………………………………....... 7
     2.1 Definitions of Language Learning Strategies…………………….…............... 7
     2.2 Classifications for Language Learning Strategies…………………………… 10
     2.3 Definitions of Vocabulary Learning Strategies………………………………. 12
     2.4 Classifications of Vocabulary Learning Strategies………………………....... 13
     2.5 Schmitt’s Taxonomy of Vocabulary Learning Strategies…………………….. 18
     2.6 Studies on EFL Learners in Taiwan………………………………………….. 22
     CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY……………………………………………. 24
     3.1 Pilot Study……………………………………………………………………. 24
     3.1.1 Subjects…………………………………………………………...…...... 24
     3.1.2 Instruments……………………………………………………………... 25
     3.1.3 Procedure………………………………………………………….......... 28
     3.1.4 Results of the Pilot Study………………………………………………. 29
     3.2 Main Study………………………………………………………………….... 35
     3.2.1 Framework………………………………………………………...…..... 35
     3.2.2 Subjects………………………………………………………………..... 36
     3.2.3 Procedure………………………………………………………….......... 37
     3.2.4 Data Analysis………………………………………………………….... 38
     
     CHAPTER 4 RESULTS……………………………………………………… 39
     4.1 Use Frequency in Vocabulary Learning Strategies for AO and VO………… 40
     4.1.1 Overall Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use Frequency for AO and VO. 40
     4.1.2 Specific Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use Frequency for AO and VO……………………………………………………………………..
     42
     4.2 Rank of Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use Frequency for AO and VO……. 47
     4.2.1 Frequencies of Use of Different Strategies…………………………….. 48
     4.2.2 The Most and the Least Frequently Used Strategies…………………..... 58
     4.3 Use Frequency in Vocabulary Learning Strategies for Good Learners and Poor Learners………………………………………………………………….
     62
     4.4 Summary of the Results……………………………………………………..... 66
     
     CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION………………………………………………….. 68
     5.1 Use Frequency Difference in Vocabulary Learning Strategies for AO and VO…………………………………………………………………………….
     68
     5.1.1 Difference of Overall Strategy Use Frequency for AO and VO………... 68
     5.1.2 Difference of Strategy Category Use Frequency for AO and VO…….... 69
     5.1.3 Difference of Strategy Item Use Frequency for AO and VO…………... 72
     5.2 Rank of Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use Frequency for AO and VO……. 74
     5.2.1 Rank of Use Frequency: Overall Strategies and the Five Strategy Categories……………………………………………………………….
     74
     5.2.2 Rank of Use Frequency: Individual Strategies…………………………. 75
     5.2.3 The Five Most Frequently Used VLS by AO and VO…………………. 80
     5.2.4 The Five Least Frequently Used VLS by AO and VO…………………. 81
     5.3 Use Frequency Difference in Vocabulary Learning Strategies for Good Learners and Poor Learners…………………………………………………...
     83
     
     CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION……………………………………………....... 84
     6.1 Summary of the Major Findings……………………………………………… 84
     6.1.1 Comparison of Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use Frequency by AO and VO………………………………………………………………....
     84
     6.1.2 Rank of Use Frequency in Vocabulary Learning Strategies for AO and VO……………………………………………………………………...
     85
     6.1.3 Relationship Between Vocabulary Learning Achievement and Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use Frequency………………………….
     86
     6.2 Pedagogical Implications……………………………………………………... 86
     6.3 Limitations of the Present Study & Suggestions for Further Research………. 89
     
     References………………………………………………………………………... 91
     
     Appendix A………………………………………………………………………. 99
     Appendix B………………………………………………………………………. 102
     Appendix C……………………………………………………………………..... 108
     
     
     LIST OF TABLES
     
      Page
     Table 2-1 Defining Language Learning Strategies……………………………. 8
     Table 2-2 Features of Language Learning Strategies………………………….. 10
     Table 2-3 Structured and Unstructured Approach to Vocabulary Learning by Sanaoui (1995)………………………………………………………
     14
     Table 2-4 Classification of Vocabulary Learning Strategies by Gu and Johnson (1996)……………..………………………………………..
     15
     Table 2-5 Taxonomy of Vocabulary Learning Strategies by Nation (2001)…... 17
     Table 2-6 Taxonomy of vocabulary learning strategies by Lin (2001)………... 17
     Table 2-7 Taxonomy of Schmitt’s Vocabulary Learning Strategies (1997)…... 19
     Table 3-1 Number of the Sample Students in the Pilot Study…………………. 25
     Table 3-2 Items Deleted in the VLSQ…………………………………………. 27
     Table 3-3 Item Analysis of the VLSQ in the Pilot Study……………………… 30
     Table 3-4 The Strategy Items in the Main Study………………………………. 31
     Table 3-5 Index of Item Difficulty…………………………………………….. 32
     Table 3-6 Index of Item Discrimination……………………………………….. 32
     Table 3-7 Item Statistics for the Vocabulary Achievement Test (VAT)………... 32
     Table 3-8 Level Analysis of the Options in the VAT…………………………... 33
     Table 3-9 Population and Sample Schools……………………………….......... 37
     Table 3-10 Sample Distribution………………………………………………... 37
     Table 4-1 Sample Description…………………………………………………. 39
     Table 4-2 Strategy Use Frequency in Part 1 and Part 2 for AO and VO……… 40
     Table 4-3 Strategy Use Frequency in Part 1 for AO and VO………………….. 41
     Table 4-4 Strategy Use Frequency in Part 2 for AO and VO………………….. 41
     Table 4-5 Strategy Use Frequency in Each Strategy Category for AO and VO. 42
     Table 4-6 Use Frequency of Each Strategy Item for AO and VO in Determination Category (Part 1)……………………………………
     43
     Table 4-7 Use Frequency of Each Strategy Item for AO and VO in Social Category (Part 1)……………………………………………………
     44
     Table 4-8 Use Frequency of Each Strategy Item for AO and VO in Social Category (Part 2)………………………………….............................
     44
     Table 4-9 Use Frequency of Each Strategy Item for AO and VO in Memory Category (Part 2)……………………………………………………
     45
     Table 4-10 Use Frequency of Each Strategy Item for AO and VO in Cognitive Category (Part 2)...............................................................................
     46
     Table 4-11 Use Frequency of Each Strategy Item for AO and VO in Metacognitive Category (Part 2)…………………………………...
     47
     Table 4-12 Rank of Strategy Category Use Frequency for AO and VO………. 49
     Table 4-13 Rank of Use Frequency: Determination Strategies………………... 50
     Table 4-14 Rank of Use Frequency: Social Strategies………………………… 51
     Table 4-15 Rank of Use Frequency: Memory Strategies……………………… 53
     Table 4-16 Rank of Use Frequency: Cognitive Strategies…………………...... 55
     Table 4-17 Rank of Use Frequency: Metacognitive Strategies………………... 56
     Table 4-18 Relationship Between AO & VO Rank in Each Strategy Category.
     57
     Table 4-19 Rank of Use Frequency of Each Strategy for AO Students………..
     59
     Table 4-20 Rank of Use Frequency of Each Strategy for VO Students………..
     60
     Table 4-21 Five Most Frequently Used VLS by AO and VO…………………. 61
     Table 4-22 Five Least Frequently Used VLS by AO and VO………………… 62
     Table 4-23 A Comparison of Overall Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use Frequency for Good Learners and Poor Learners
     63
     Table 4-24 A Comparison of Strategy Use Frequency in Part 1 for Good Learners and Poor Learners………………………………………...
     63
     Table 4-25 A Comparison of Strategy Use Frequency in Part 2 for Good Learners and Poor Learners………………………..….....................
     64
     Table 4-26 A Comparison of Each Strategy Category Use Frequency in Part 1 for Good Learners and Poor Learners……………………………...
     64
     Table 4-27 A Comparison of Each Strategy Category Use Frequency in Part for Good Learners and Poor Learners………………………………
     65
     
     
     LIST OF FIGURES
     
      Page
     Figure 1 Framework for the Research…………………………………………. 36
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 46293 bytes-
dc.format.extent 38359 bytes-
dc.format.extent 22435 bytes-
dc.format.extent 68151 bytes-
dc.format.extent 24715 bytes-
dc.format.extent 51059 bytes-
dc.format.extent 152309 bytes-
dc.format.extent 161089 bytes-
dc.format.extent 96515 bytes-
dc.format.extent 27611 bytes-
dc.format.extent 59061 bytes-
dc.format.extent 224810 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0919510133en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 綜合高中zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 字彙zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 字彙學習策略zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) comprehensive high schoolen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) vocabularyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) vocabulary learning strategiesen_US
dc.title (題名) 台灣綜合高中學生字彙學習策略之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) An Exploratory Study on Vocabulary Learning Strategies by Comprehensive High School Students in Taiwanen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ahmed, M. O. (1989). Vocabulary learning strategies. In P. Meara (Ed.), Beyond words (pp. 3-14). London: CILT.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Angelis, P. (1974). Listening comprehension and error analysis. In G. Nickel (Ed.), Applied contrastive linguistics. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baddeley, A. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bialystok, E. (1978). A Theoretical Model of Second Language Learning. Language Learning, 28(1), 69-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bialystok, E. (1979). The Role of Conscious Strategies in Second Language Proficiency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 35, 372-394.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bremner, S. (1999) Language learning strategies and language proficiency: Investigating the relationship in Hong Kong. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55(4), 490-514.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, C., & M. E. Payne (1994). Five Essential Steps or Processes in Vocabulary Learning. Paper presented at the TESOL 1994, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cameron, L (2001). Teaching Languages to Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Catalan, R. M. J. (2003). Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 54-77.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.) (1991). Language teaching approaches: An overview. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (2nd ed.) Boston: Heinle & Heinele Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 227-249.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chamot, A. U., & O`Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA Handbook: How to Implement the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chen, B. C. (1999). Discrepancy of vocabulary learning strategies between high achievers and low achievers at a junior college in Taiwan. The proceedings of the 14th national conference on technical and vocational education (pp. 223-231). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chen, H. J. (1998). Second language learning vocabulary strategies: A preliminary investigation of Chinese EFL learners. The proceedings of the 6th international symposium on English teaching (pp. 219-230). Taipei: Crane.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chen, L. C. (2003). The effects of “word meanings inferred from context” instruction in English vocabulary learning of vocational high school students: A case study. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (Eds.). (1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cohen, A. D. (2001). The Learner’s Side of Foreign LanguageLearning: Where do Styles, Strategies, and Tasks Meet? Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cook, L. K., & Mayer. R. E. (1983). Reading strategies training for meaningful learning from prose. In M. Pressley and J. Levin (Eds) Cognitive strategy research. New York: Springer Verlag.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DeCarrico, J. S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In Celces-Murcia M. (Ed.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 285-299). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duffy, Gerald G.. (2003) Explaining reading: A resource for teaching concepts, skills, and strategies (pp. 57-78). New York: Guilford Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ebel, R. L. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fan, Y. M. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 222-241.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gorman, T. P. (1979). Teaching reading at the advanced level. In M. Celce-Murcia & L. McIntosh (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 154-162). Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gung Hsiao, T. Y. (1997). An exploratory study of language learning strategies by learners of English as a foreign language. The proceedings of the fourteenth conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp.57-78). Taipei: Crane.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gu, Y. (2002). Gender, academic major, and vocabulary learning strategies of Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 33(1), 35-54.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gu, Y. (2005). Vocabulary learning strategies in the Chinese context. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language learning, 46(4), 643-679.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gung, W. C. (2004). An exploratory study on vocabulary learning strategies by Taiwanese EFL elementary school students. Unpublished Master Degree Thesis, National Taipei Teachers College.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Huang, C. C. (2001). An investigation of ESP students’ vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension. The proceedings of the tenth conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp.436-445). Taipei: Crane.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Huang, T. L. (1997). A study of word analysis and inference on vocabulary teaching and learning. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Judd, E. L. (1978). Vocabulary teaching and TESOL: A need for reevaluation of existing assumptions. TESOL Quarterly, 12(1), 71-76.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kelly, P. (1991). Lexical ignorance: The main obstacle to listening comprehension with advanced foreign language teachers. IRAL, 29(2), 135-149.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Knight, S. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students with different verbal abilities. The modern Language Journal, 78, 285-299.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kojic-Sabo, I., & Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Students’ approaches to vocabulary learning and their relationship to success. Modern Language Journal, 83, 176-192.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kudo, Y. (1999). L2 vocabulary learning strategies (NFLRC NetWork #14) [HTMLzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) document]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Retrieved [September 25, 2005] from the World Wide Web: http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW14/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In J. L. Arnaud & H. Bejoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126-132). London: MacMillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don’t know, words you think you know, and words you can’t guess. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 20-34). New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Laufer, B. Shmueli, K. (1997) Memorizing new words: Does teaching have anything to do with it? RELC Journal, 28, 89-108zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lawson, M. J., & Hogben, D. (1996). The vocabulary learning strategies of foreign language students. Language Learning, 46, 101-135.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lin, L. (2001). Taiwanese children’s EFL vocabulary learning strategies. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chinhua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Maiguashca, R. U. (1993). Teaching and learning vocabulary in a second language: Past, present, and future directions. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50 (1), 83-100.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCarthy, J. (1989). Artificial Intelligence, Logic and Formalizing Common Sense. In Thomason, R., (Ed.), Philosophical Logic and Artificial Intelligence. Klüver Academic.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ministry of Education, Taiwan. (2007). 綜合高中資訊網 [HTML document] Retrieved [May 3, 2005] from the World Wide Web: http://page.phsh.tyc.edu.tw/com/index¬_1.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mohamed A.E. (1996). Language Learning Strategies employed by Secondary School Students Learning English as a Foreign Language in Malaysia. Doctoral Dissertation. School of Education, University of Leeds.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H. H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, The Modern Language Center.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nation, I. S. P. (1982). Beginning to learn foreign vocabulary: A review of the research. RELC Journal, 13, 14-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Heinle and Heinle.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Küpper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985a). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) O`Malley, J. M. (1987). The effects of training in the use of learning strategies on learning English as a second language. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Ed.). Learner strategies in language learning (pp.133-144). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oxford, R. L. & Crookall, D. (1989). Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings, and instructional issues. Modern Language Journal, 73, 404-419.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oxford R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oxford, R. L. (1992/1993). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. TESOL Journal, 2 (2), 18-22zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M.E. (1995). Adults learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System, 23, 359-386.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 291-300.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pimsleur, P. (1967). A memory schedule. The Modern Language Journal, 51, 73-75.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Politzer, R. L., & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviors and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESO Quarterly, 19, 103-123.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Raimes, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 229-258.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Richards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77-89.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 15-30). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sanaoui, R. (1995). Adult learners’ approaches to learning vocabulary in second languages. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 15-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.) Vocabulary: description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 199-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 304-318.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stoffer, I. (1995). University foreign language students’ choice of vocabulary learning strategies as related to individual difference variables. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Alabama.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Su, M. L. (2003). Comparison of English learning attitudes, motivation and strategies between vocational-oriented students and college-oriented students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaoshiung Normal University, Kaoshiung, Taiwan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sunderland, J. (2000). Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education. Language Teaching, 33, 203-223.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sy, B. M. (1996). Sex Differences and Language Learning Strategies. In T. H. Nash, J. W. Chiu, & R. Schulte (Eds.), Papers from the Eleventh Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp.19-51). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 143-163.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tsuchida, M. (2002). The learning strategies: Helping students learn how to learn. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED463655)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wang, Y. H. (2004). An investigation into vocabulary learning strategies used by senior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wenden, A. L. (1987). Conceptual background and utility. In A.L. Wenden, & J. Rubins (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp.3-13). London: Prentice Hall International.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Presszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching (p. 111). London: Edward Arnold.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wu, R. T. Y. (1996). Comprehensive high school: An effective way to integrate academic and vocational education in Taiwan, Republic of China. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED404545)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zheng, H. H.(2002)。《高中英文參考詞彙表之編輯方法及原則》。台北:大學入學考試中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zimmerman, C. B. (1997). Do reading and interactive vocabulary study make a difference? An empirical study. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (1), 121-140.zh_TW