學術產出-研究報告
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 公平交易法對公司名稱規範與保護及範圍 作者 林國全;馮震宇 貢獻者 行政院公平會;國立政治大學法律學系 關鍵詞 公司名稱;善意使用;不正當方法使用;corporate name;fair use;unjust use;法律學 日期 2003 上傳時間 21-七月-2010 15:42:32 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究計畫為「公平交易法對公司名稱規範與保護及範圍」。為保護社會交易安全，防止有仿冒影射，利用既有公司商譽之不正競爭行為，公司法與公平交易法對公司名稱之使用，原皆有所規範。但在民國九十年十一月修正後之公司法，對於公司名稱使用之規範，已不及於仿冒影射等公司名稱之冒濫使用，而侷限於「已登記」公司名稱專用權之保護，其作用僅止於企業主體之界定。換言之，在民國九十年十一月公司法修正後，關於有關公司名稱冒濫使用之不公平競爭行為防止，公平交易法第二十條乃至第二十四條之概括規定，將擔負起更大於以往之功能。在此一問題上，公平交易法應如何運作，始能發揮最大效率，其規範始能臻於合理、有效，即為本研究計畫所欲探討之內容。 本研究計畫將先整理我國現行法令有關公司名稱、商號使用之規範，並參酌該等法令之實務運作事例，以釐清各有關法令之規範內容及保護差異。其次，將蒐集英、美、日、德等國家有關公司名稱與其他財產權之關係、管理規範及及實務上具體做法。透過比較分析，研擬公平交易委員會處理「善意使用」與「以不正當方法使用」公司商號之「表徵」，而違反公平交易法之標準。最後，並因應商標法修正草案對公司名稱之規範，探討公平交易法處理「公司名稱」專用權之適用範圍及保護程度。 This research deals with regulations and protections about the name of the company in the Fair Trade Law .In order to prevent the unfair competition behavior ,such as counterfeit ,being suggestive of the goodwill of another company , the Fair Trade Law and the Company Law originally regulated the use of the company name to protect the security of trade in society .But ,after the amendment of the Company Law in Nov. 2001 ,regulations about the use of the company name are restricted to the protection of the private right of the registered company name ,and their function is just to define the corporate body . Regulations in the amended Company Law no longer deals with problems as counterfeit ,being suggestive of the name of another company .In other words ,with the amendment of the Company Law ,article 21 and article 24(the general rule) of the Fair Trade Law will get more important to avoid the unfair competition behavior---counterfeit of another company？？s name .This research discusses what way will make the use of the Fair Trade Law being most efficient and let regulations in the Fair Trade Law reasonable . The first part of this research lists decrees about the use of the company or store name .Comparing with practices and cases ,then the research separates the varieties in contents and the range of protections of listed decrees . In the second part ,the research will gather ordinances and practices about the company name and its relation with other property rights of England ,U.S ,Japan and Germany .By the comparison and analysis ,this research will propose the Fair Trade Commission for standards of the use in good faith and how to deal with the unjust use of the token of the company .At last ,with the amendment proposal of the Trade Mark Law ,this research discuss the application and protection of the company name in the Fair Trade Law . 關聯 應用研究;合作研究;研究期間:9203~9211;研究經費: 450 千元 資料類型 report dc.contributor 行政院公平會;國立政治大學法律學系 en dc.creator (作者) 林國全;馮震宇 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2003 - dc.date.accessioned 21-七月-2010 15:42:32 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 21-七月-2010 15:42:32 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 21-七月-2010 15:42:32 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/43104 - dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究計畫為「公平交易法對公司名稱規範與保護及範圍」。為保護社會交易安全，防止有仿冒影射，利用既有公司商譽之不正競爭行為，公司法與公平交易法對公司名稱之使用，原皆有所規範。但在民國九十年十一月修正後之公司法，對於公司名稱使用之規範，已不及於仿冒影射等公司名稱之冒濫使用，而侷限於「已登記」公司名稱專用權之保護，其作用僅止於企業主體之界定。換言之，在民國九十年十一月公司法修正後，關於有關公司名稱冒濫使用之不公平競爭行為防止，公平交易法第二十條乃至第二十四條之概括規定，將擔負起更大於以往之功能。在此一問題上，公平交易法應如何運作，始能發揮最大效率，其規範始能臻於合理、有效，即為本研究計畫所欲探討之內容。 本研究計畫將先整理我國現行法令有關公司名稱、商號使用之規範，並參酌該等法令之實務運作事例，以釐清各有關法令之規範內容及保護差異。其次，將蒐集英、美、日、德等國家有關公司名稱與其他財產權之關係、管理規範及及實務上具體做法。透過比較分析，研擬公平交易委員會處理「善意使用」與「以不正當方法使用」公司商號之「表徵」，而違反公平交易法之標準。最後，並因應商標法修正草案對公司名稱之規範，探討公平交易法處理「公司名稱」專用權之適用範圍及保護程度。 This research deals with regulations and protections about the name of the company in the Fair Trade Law .In order to prevent the unfair competition behavior ,such as counterfeit ,being suggestive of the goodwill of another company , the Fair Trade Law and the Company Law originally regulated the use of the company name to protect the security of trade in society .But ,after the amendment of the Company Law in Nov. 2001 ,regulations about the use of the company name are restricted to the protection of the private right of the registered company name ,and their function is just to define the corporate body . Regulations in the amended Company Law no longer deals with problems as counterfeit ,being suggestive of the name of another company .In other words ,with the amendment of the Company Law ,article 21 and article 24(the general rule) of the Fair Trade Law will get more important to avoid the unfair competition behavior---counterfeit of another company？？s name .This research discusses what way will make the use of the Fair Trade Law being most efficient and let regulations in the Fair Trade Law reasonable . The first part of this research lists decrees about the use of the company or store name .Comparing with practices and cases ,then the research separates the varieties in contents and the range of protections of listed decrees . In the second part ,the research will gather ordinances and practices about the company name and its relation with other property rights of England ,U.S ,Japan and Germany .By the comparison and analysis ,this research will propose the Fair Trade Commission for standards of the use in good faith and how to deal with the unjust use of the token of the company .At last ,with the amendment proposal of the Trade Mark Law ,this research discuss the application and protection of the company name in the Fair Trade Law . en dc.format.extent 2831434 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.language zh_TW en dc.language.iso en_US - dc.relation (關聯) 應用研究;合作研究;研究期間:9203~9211;研究經費: 450 千元 en dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公司名稱;善意使用;不正當方法使用;corporate name;fair use;unjust use;法律學 en dc.title (題名) 公平交易法對公司名稱規範與保護及範圍 zh_TW dc.type (資料類型) report en
