1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 社會科學學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 地方創新環境與創新成效之研究
作者 龔欣平
貢獻者 邊泰明
龔欣平
關鍵詞 區域創新系統
創新成效
競爭力
日期 2007
上傳時間 9-十二月-2010 16:25:21 (UTC+8)
摘要 近幾十年來，受到全球化與資訊化的影響，知識的創新能力表現成為競爭力優劣的重要指標，國家或地區經濟發展競爭力高低，與其全球化優勢息息相關，而全球化競爭優勢能力又取決於其創新成效表現高低。台灣在全球化的浪潮及大陸開放競爭下，地方傳統產業在此衝擊下面臨倒閉或出走。在這充滿變數與挑戰的階段，本文從區域創新系統角度探討地方創新環境與其創新能力表現對競爭力的影響。
本研究藉文獻探討及台灣地區鄉鎮市之基礎數據資料分析研究，以創新系統觀點探討影響地方創新成效的關鍵因素，並據此選定衡量創新成效指標，再針對台灣區域地方環境、產業發展及國內創新環境現況，探討目前地方創新活動的狀況與設施，建構台灣地區地方創新系統指標。再利用多變量分析方法進行實證分析，利用因子分析取得代表地方創新環境與區域發展特徵之因素，並將其萃取出創新能力因子，作為劃分創新能力集群之根據，分為高、低創新成效地區；最後印證創新成效表現優異地區，其所具有創新能力之特質與創新成效表現優劣間之相關性。
本研究實證結果如下：一、影響創新成效主要因素為製造業產業群聚與支援性服務設施；二、高度創新成效地區皆坐落於新竹以北地區；三、創新能力因子指數與專利數產出量不一定成正相關，創新能力因子指數高僅代表該地區環境具有利於產業間分享知識技術交流的能力與潛力，但此種能力不一定表現在專利數產出量多寡，而須倚賴觀察該地區的各項創新活動狀況；四、創新能力因子指數高地區，近3年（93-95）來的專利數產出遠超過過去10年(83-92)，推論地區內產業及創新設施已成熟，再加上智慧財產權保護觀念普及，促使專利數量大增；五、鄰近創新成效較高之地區，使其創新成效表現低卻屬於高度創新成效地區，推論其因位置直接毗鄰高度創新成效地區，受地理鄰近性影響甚大。
最後建議政府應協助各地區地方政府鼓勵產業投資發展，提高地方創新研發動能，並積極輔導大學與育成中心提高其育成與輔導的效率，未來更應建立媒合大學及育成中心與產業界之合作機制，以推動產、官、學、研各種人才流通，提高研發創新能力。
In the past few decades, the influence of globalization and informationization has made the ability to generate innovations in knowledge a key benchmark in competitiveness. The competitiveness of a country or region`s economy is now closely linked to its global advantage. This global competitiveness, in turn, hinges on its ability to innovate. In Taiwan, the impact of globalization and China`s market liberalization has seen local traditional industries either shut down or move elsewhere. In a time filled with uncertainties and challenges, this study seeks to examine the effect of a regional innovation environment and its innovation capability on competitiveness from a regional innovation system perspective.
In this study, we review and analyze the basic data from Taiwan`s regional areas and examine the key factors influencing the effectiveness of regional innovation. This was then used to select the indicators for evaluating innovation performance. Taiwan`s regional environment, industry development and the current state of the domestic innovation environment were then examined to determine the current state and infrastructure of regional innovation activities to construct a set of regional innovation system indicators for Taiwan. Empirical analysis was performed utilizing multivariate analysis. First, factory analysis was used to extract the factors that represent the regional innovation environment and regional development characteristics. From these, we determine the innovation capability factors, and use these to define the innovation capability clusters. These clusters were then separated into high and low innovation effectiveness regions. Finally, we examine the areas with high innovation effectiveness and determine the correspondence between their innovation characteristics and their innovation performance.
The empirical results from this study were as follow: 1. The main factors influencing innovation effectiveness were industry clustering and support services & infrastructure; 2. The regions with high innovation effectiveness were all located north of Hsinchu; 3. The innovation capability factor index may not correspond directly to patent output. A high innovation capability factor index only indicates that a region possesses the capability and potential to facilitate the sharing of knowledge and technology between industries. This capability may not necessarily be reflected in the patent output, but is instead, depends on the innovation activities being conducted in the region; 4. In regions with high innovation capability factor indices, their patent output in the past 3 years (2004~2006) far exceed the preceding decade (1994~2003). We hypothesize that the maturity of their local industries & innovation infrastructure, as well as widespread understanding of intellectual property rights, encouraged the rapid increase in the number of patents; 5. Some regions near highly innovative regions perform less effectively even though they are part of the same area. We hypothesize that this is directly caused by their geographical proximity to highly innovative regions.
Finally, we recommend that the government provide assistance for regional governments to encourage investment in industrial developments and boost local innovative R&D capabilities. Assistance should also be provided to universities and incubation centers to improve their incubation & assistance effectiveness. In the future, a cooperative mechanism for linking universities, incubation centers and the industry should be set up as well to boost the capability for innovative R&D by encouraging the free flow of expertise between the industry, government, academic and research sectors.
參考文獻 1.丁家鵬，2005，「台灣地方城市創意競爭力」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文：台北。
2.王緝慈等，2001，『創新的空間—企業集群與區域發展』，北京：北京大學出版社。
3.天下雜誌，2003，『25縣市競爭力排行榜』，台北：天下雜誌出版社。
4.天下雜誌，2005，『「2005一千大調查』，台北：天下雜誌出版社。
5.中國社會科學院財貿所，2005，「2005年城市競爭力藍皮書」。
6.邱皓政，2004，『量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析』，五南圖書出版：台北
7.行政院主計處，2001，『台閩地區工商及服務業普查報告』，台北：行政院主計處。
8.行政院經濟建設委員會，2004，『都市及區域發展彙編』，台北：行政院經濟建設委員會。
9.行政院國家科學委員會，2003，『中華民國科技機構名錄』，台北：行政院國家科學委員會。
10.朱南玉，2004，「從研發知識及產業群聚效益建立地方創新能力模型之研究」，國立台北大學都市計畫研究所博士論文：台北。
11.朱雲鵬、林美萱，2001，「從WEF全球競爭力報告看台灣之競爭力」，『財團法人國家政策基金會國政分析』http://old.npf.org.tw/。
12.吳思華，1998，「知識流通對產業創新之影響」，論文發表於『第七屆產業管理研討會』，政治大學科技管理研究所：台北，87年10月。
13.林佳樺，2002，「育成中心影響廠商創新活動成效之研究」，國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文：台北。
14.林楨家，2004，「知識可及性對創新的影響：以台灣北部區域電子產業為例」，運輸計劃季刊，33（3）：577-602。
15.胡太山，2005，「科技社群互動及其對生產與創新成效之影響」，國立台北大學都市計劃研究所博士論文：台北。
16.翁明祥，1978，「技術創新政策與事業經營策略的配合對技術創新績效之影響--台灣合成樹脂業實証研究」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文：台北。
17.張在今，2005，「組織寬裕資源、創新與組織經營績效之關連性研究–以台灣電子產業為例」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文：台北。。
18.張元杰、陳明惠，2002，『創新系統』之知識觀點論：整合與挑戰。
19.黃文櫻，1990，「都市競爭力與製造業生產力關係之研究」，政治大學地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
20.黃俊英，2000，『多變量分析』，台北：翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。
21.遠見雜誌，2004，『2004年縣市總體競爭力大調查』，台北：天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
22.楊政龍、金家禾，2002，「知識設施空間分佈對台灣製造業生產與創新成效之影響」，『台灣土地研究』，4：101-124。
23.劉仁傑、巫茂熾，2002，「全球區域創新系統驅趨勢—中台灣區域創新研究」，『機械工業雜誌』，第236期：203-211。
24.劉珊芳，2006，「地方製造業生產力與創新績效之研究」，政治大學地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
25.邊泰明，1992，「台灣地區製造業都市化及地方化經濟分析」，『國立政治大學學報』，66：233-248。
26.Florida,A.著，2002，鄒應瑗譯，2003，『創意新貴』，台北：日月文化出版。
27.Florida,A.著，2005，傅振焜譯，2006，『創意新貴II：城市與創意階級』，台北：日月文化出版。
28.Porter,M.E.著，李明軒、邱如美合譯，1997，『國家競爭優勢』，台北：天下文化出版。
29.Saxenian, A.著，1999，彭蕙仙、常雲鳳譯，『區域優勢 : 矽谷與一二八公路的文化與競爭』，台北：天下遠見出版。
1、Amin,A. and Thrift,N. ,1995, ”Globalisation,Institutional ‘Thickness’ and the Local Economy”, Managing Ciities：Singaapore.
2、Anselin, L. , Varga, A. , Acs, Z. ,1997,“Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations”, Journal of Urban Economics, 42：422-448.
3、Barney, J. ,1991, “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Manngement, 17（1）：99-120.
4、Begg, I. ,1999, “Cities and competitiveness.” Urban Studies,36（5-6）：791-793.
5、Belussi,F. ,1999, “Policies for the Development of Knowledge-intensive Local Production Systems”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(6)：729-747.
6、Boekholt, P. and van der Weele, E. ,1998, “Regional innovation system：The role of governances in a globalized world-southeast brabant：a regional innovation system in transition”, UCL Press.
7、Buesa, K. and Heijs, J. ,2004, “ Regional systems of innovation and the knowledge production function: the Spanish case”, Technovation：1-10.
8、Camagni, R. ,1991, “Innovation Networks. Spatial Perspectives”, London/New York: Belhaven.
9、Carbonara, N. ,2004, “Innovation processes within geographical clusters: a cognitive approach”, Technovation, 24：17-28.
10、Ciampi, C. A. ,1996, “Enhancing European competitiveness, Banca Nazionale di lavoro”, Quarterly Review, 197：143-164.
11、Clark, J. and Guy,K. ,1998, “Innovation and competitiveness”,Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10：363-395.
12、Coase,R. ,1960, ”The problem of social cost”, Journal of Law and Economics, 3：1-44.
13、Comelius, 2002, “The growth competitiveness index: Recent economic developments and the prospects for a sustained recovery. in: World Economic Forum, 2002.” Global Competitiveness Report. Geneve.：3–21.
14、Cooke, P.,Uranga, M. and Etexbarria, G. ,1997, “Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimension”, Research Policy, 26：475-491.
15、Cooke, P.,Uranga, M. and Etexbarria, G. ,1998, “Regional Systems of innovation：an evolutionary perspective”,Environment and Planning A.30(9)：1563-1584.
16、Edquist, C. ,1997, “Systems of Innovation : Technologies, Institutions and Organizations”, Chapter 1, London and Washington: Pinter.
17、Evangelista, R. , Iammarino,S. , Mastrostefano,V. , and Alberto,S. ,2002, “Looking for regional systems of innovation﹕evidence from the Italian innovation survey ,” Regional Studies 362：173-186.
18、European Commission, 2001, Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounts and Derived Indicators: A Methodological Guide, European Communities, Luxembourg.
19、Feldman, M. P.、Florida, R., 1994, “The Geographic Sources of Innovation: Technological Infrastructure and Product Innovation in the United States”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers , 84(2): 210-229.
20、Feldman, M. P.、Audretsch,D., 1999, “Innovation in Cities: Science-based, Diversity,Specialization and Localized Competition.”, European Economic Review, 43(2)：409-429.
21、Fischer, M. M., Varga, A., 2003,“Spatial Knowledge Spillovers and University Research: Evidence from Austria”, The Annals of Regional Science, 37： 303-322.
22、Forfas Institute, 2004, Innovation Networks, Forfas institute, http://www.forfas.ie/publications/_list/innovation.html(2007.9.30)
23、Freeman, C. ,1995, “The ‘National System of Innovation’ in Historical perspective.”, Cambridge Journal of economics, 19(1)：5-24.
24、Freeman, C. ,1987, “ Technology policy and economic performance: lesson from Japan.” London:Pinter
25、Gerstlberger, W. ,2004, “Regional innovation systems and sustainability-selected examples of international discussion”, Technovation ,24：749-758.
26、Glaeser,E., Kall,D., Scheinkman,J., Shleifer,J. ,1992, ”Growth in Cities”, Journal of Political Economy, 100(6)：1126-1152.
27、Griliches, Z. , 1979, “Issue in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth.”, Bell Journal of Economics, 10: 92-116.
28、Gregersen,B. , Johnson,B. , 1991, “Learning Economics,Innovation Systems and European Integration”, Regional Studies, 31(5)：479-490.
29、Hall,P. ,1999, “The Future of Cities”, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 23(2)：173-185.
30、Henderson,V.,Kuncoro,A.,Turner,M.,1995, “Industrial Development in cities”, Journal of Political Economy, 103(5)：1067-1090.
31、Holt,K. ,1983, “Product Innovation Management”, 2nd ed , London: Butter Worths.
32、Industry Canada, 1995. Competitive: Concepts and Measures, Occasional Paper Number 5, Ottawa.
33、Jaffe, A. B., 1989,“Real effects of academic research”, The American Economic Review, 79 (5)：957-970.
34、Jaffe, A.B. , Trajtenberg. M, and Henderson, R. ,1993,“Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108：557-598.
35、Kilne, S. and Rosenberg, S. ,1986, “An overview of innovation”, in Ralph Landau and Nathan Rosenberg（eds）, The positive sum strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36、Kresl, P. K. ,1995, “The determinates of urban competitiveness : A Survey, in P.K. Kresl and G. Gappert（Eds）.” North Americal Cities and the Global Economy：45-68.
37、Krugman, P. ,1996, “Urban concentration：the role of increasing returns and transport costs”, International Regional Science Review, 19：5-48.
38、Love, J. H., Roper, S. ,2001,“Location and network effects on innovation success: evidence for UK, German and Irish manufacturing plants”, Research Policy, 30：643-661.
39、Lundvall, B-A. ed., 1992, National systems of innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and interactive Learning, London: Pinter.
40、Maskell, P. and Malmberg, A. , 1999,“Localised learning and industrial competitiveness”,Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23: 167-185.
41、Malecki, E. J. , 2002 , “Hard and soft networks for urban competitiveness”, Urban Studies, 39（5-6）：929-945.
42、Nelson, R. ,1995, “Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change” , Journal of Economic Literature, 33, March,：48-90.
43、OECD ,1996, “Managing National Innovation Systems”, Paris.
44、OECD ,1999, “Managing National Innovation Systems, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development”, Paris
45、Oerlemans, L. , Meeus, M. and Boekema, F. , 2000, “Innovation and proximity: theoretical perspectives.” ,Industrial networks and proximity.
46、Reid, E. ,1995, “Virtual worlds: Culture and imagination. In S. Jones(ed.).”, Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community：164-183.
47、Rothwell, R. ,1986, “The Role of Small Firms in Technological Innovation”, in Curran,J(ed), The Surrival of the Small Firm, London：Gower.
48、Saxenian, A. ,1994 , “Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128.”, Harvard University Press,Camgridge,MA.
49、Schon, D.A. ,1967, “ Technology and Change.” ,Pergamon Press.
50、Schumpeter, J. A. ,1934, “Theory of Economic Development”, Cambridge MA：Harvard Business Press,Camgridge,MA.
51、Stroper, M. ,1995, “The resurgence of regional economics, ten years latter: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies” , European Urban and Regional Studies, 2：161-221
52、Stalk, J. , Evans, P. and Sculman, L. E. ,1992, “Competing on capabilities: The new rules of corporate strategy.” , Harvard business review, 70(2)：57-69.
53、Sternberg, R. , 2000 , “Innovation networks and regional development-Evidence from the European Regional Innovation Survey(ERIS)：Theoretical concepts, methodological approach, empirical basis and introduction to the theme issue”, European Planning Studies, 8：389-407.
54、Zaltman, G. , Duncan, R. , and Holbek, J. ,1973, “Innovations and Organizations.” , NY: John Wiley and Sons.
55、Zanakis, S. H. and Becerra-Fernandez, I. ,2005, “Competitiveness of nations: A knowledge discovery examination”, European Journal of Operational Research, 166：185-211.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政研究所
93923014
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093923014
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 邊泰明zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 龔欣平zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 龔欣平zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-十二月-2010 16:25:21 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-十二月-2010 16:25:21 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-十二月-2010 16:25:21 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0093923014en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50022-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 地政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93923014zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 近幾十年來，受到全球化與資訊化的影響，知識的創新能力表現成為競爭力優劣的重要指標，國家或地區經濟發展競爭力高低，與其全球化優勢息息相關，而全球化競爭優勢能力又取決於其創新成效表現高低。台灣在全球化的浪潮及大陸開放競爭下，地方傳統產業在此衝擊下面臨倒閉或出走。在這充滿變數與挑戰的階段，本文從區域創新系統角度探討地方創新環境與其創新能力表現對競爭力的影響。
本研究藉文獻探討及台灣地區鄉鎮市之基礎數據資料分析研究，以創新系統觀點探討影響地方創新成效的關鍵因素，並據此選定衡量創新成效指標，再針對台灣區域地方環境、產業發展及國內創新環境現況，探討目前地方創新活動的狀況與設施，建構台灣地區地方創新系統指標。再利用多變量分析方法進行實證分析，利用因子分析取得代表地方創新環境與區域發展特徵之因素，並將其萃取出創新能力因子，作為劃分創新能力集群之根據，分為高、低創新成效地區；最後印證創新成效表現優異地區，其所具有創新能力之特質與創新成效表現優劣間之相關性。
本研究實證結果如下：一、影響創新成效主要因素為製造業產業群聚與支援性服務設施；二、高度創新成效地區皆坐落於新竹以北地區；三、創新能力因子指數與專利數產出量不一定成正相關，創新能力因子指數高僅代表該地區環境具有利於產業間分享知識技術交流的能力與潛力，但此種能力不一定表現在專利數產出量多寡，而須倚賴觀察該地區的各項創新活動狀況；四、創新能力因子指數高地區，近3年（93-95）來的專利數產出遠超過過去10年(83-92)，推論地區內產業及創新設施已成熟，再加上智慧財產權保護觀念普及，促使專利數量大增；五、鄰近創新成效較高之地區，使其創新成效表現低卻屬於高度創新成效地區，推論其因位置直接毗鄰高度創新成效地區，受地理鄰近性影響甚大。
最後建議政府應協助各地區地方政府鼓勵產業投資發展，提高地方創新研發動能，並積極輔導大學與育成中心提高其育成與輔導的效率，未來更應建立媒合大學及育成中心與產業界之合作機制，以推動產、官、學、研各種人才流通，提高研發創新能力。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In the past few decades, the influence of globalization and informationization has made the ability to generate innovations in knowledge a key benchmark in competitiveness. The competitiveness of a country or region`s economy is now closely linked to its global advantage. This global competitiveness, in turn, hinges on its ability to innovate. In Taiwan, the impact of globalization and China`s market liberalization has seen local traditional industries either shut down or move elsewhere. In a time filled with uncertainties and challenges, this study seeks to examine the effect of a regional innovation environment and its innovation capability on competitiveness from a regional innovation system perspective.
In this study, we review and analyze the basic data from Taiwan`s regional areas and examine the key factors influencing the effectiveness of regional innovation. This was then used to select the indicators for evaluating innovation performance. Taiwan`s regional environment, industry development and the current state of the domestic innovation environment were then examined to determine the current state and infrastructure of regional innovation activities to construct a set of regional innovation system indicators for Taiwan. Empirical analysis was performed utilizing multivariate analysis. First, factory analysis was used to extract the factors that represent the regional innovation environment and regional development characteristics. From these, we determine the innovation capability factors, and use these to define the innovation capability clusters. These clusters were then separated into high and low innovation effectiveness regions. Finally, we examine the areas with high innovation effectiveness and determine the correspondence between their innovation characteristics and their innovation performance.
The empirical results from this study were as follow: 1. The main factors influencing innovation effectiveness were industry clustering and support services & infrastructure; 2. The regions with high innovation effectiveness were all located north of Hsinchu; 3. The innovation capability factor index may not correspond directly to patent output. A high innovation capability factor index only indicates that a region possesses the capability and potential to facilitate the sharing of knowledge and technology between industries. This capability may not necessarily be reflected in the patent output, but is instead, depends on the innovation activities being conducted in the region; 4. In regions with high innovation capability factor indices, their patent output in the past 3 years (2004~2006) far exceed the preceding decade (1994~2003). We hypothesize that the maturity of their local industries & innovation infrastructure, as well as widespread understanding of intellectual property rights, encouraged the rapid increase in the number of patents; 5. Some regions near highly innovative regions perform less effectively even though they are part of the same area. We hypothesize that this is directly caused by their geographical proximity to highly innovative regions.
Finally, we recommend that the government provide assistance for regional governments to encourage investment in industrial developments and boost local innovative R&D capabilities. Assistance should also be provided to universities and incubation centers to improve their incubation & assistance effectiveness. In the future, a cooperative mechanism for linking universities, incubation centers and the industry should be set up as well to boost the capability for innovative R&D by encouraging the free flow of expertise between the industry, government, academic and research sectors.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章　緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究範圍與內容 5
第三節 研究方法與流程 7
第二章　理論基礎與文獻回顧 11
第一節　區域創新系統與指標相關理論文獻 13
第二節　城市競爭力與指標之相關文獻 20
第三節 創新成效 29
第三章　台灣地區地方創新系統指標的建構 35
第一節　創新系統層級架構 35
第二節 創新系統指標 38
第四章 研究方法與變數說明 45
第一節 研究方法 45
第二節 研究變數說明 56
第五章 實證分析 77
第一節 創新因素與創新成效相關分析 77
第二節 因子分析 79
第三節 集群分析 87
第四節 創新環境與創新成效分析 93
第六章　結論與建議 103
第一節　研究結論 103
第二節　後續研究及政策建議 106
參考文獻 109		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 63974 bytes-
dc.format.extent 89915 bytes-
dc.format.extent 86842 bytes-
dc.format.extent 72492 bytes-
dc.format.extent 148943 bytes-
dc.format.extent 357382 bytes-
dc.format.extent 135742 bytes-
dc.format.extent 486847 bytes-
dc.format.extent 405117 bytes-
dc.format.extent 125725 bytes-
dc.format.extent 104715 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093923014en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 區域創新系統zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 創新成效zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 競爭力zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 地方創新環境與創新成效之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.丁家鵬，2005，「台灣地方城市創意競爭力」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文：台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.王緝慈等，2001，『創新的空間—企業集群與區域發展』，北京：北京大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.天下雜誌，2003，『25縣市競爭力排行榜』，台北：天下雜誌出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.天下雜誌，2005，『「2005一千大調查』，台北：天下雜誌出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.中國社會科學院財貿所，2005，「2005年城市競爭力藍皮書」。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.邱皓政，2004，『量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析』，五南圖書出版：台北zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.行政院主計處，2001，『台閩地區工商及服務業普查報告』，台北：行政院主計處。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.行政院經濟建設委員會，2004，『都市及區域發展彙編』，台北：行政院經濟建設委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.行政院國家科學委員會，2003，『中華民國科技機構名錄』，台北：行政院國家科學委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.朱南玉，2004，「從研發知識及產業群聚效益建立地方創新能力模型之研究」，國立台北大學都市計畫研究所博士論文：台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.朱雲鵬、林美萱，2001，「從WEF全球競爭力報告看台灣之競爭力」，『財團法人國家政策基金會國政分析』http://old.npf.org.tw/。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.吳思華，1998，「知識流通對產業創新之影響」，論文發表於『第七屆產業管理研討會』，政治大學科技管理研究所：台北，87年10月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.林佳樺，2002，「育成中心影響廠商創新活動成效之研究」，國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文：台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.林楨家，2004，「知識可及性對創新的影響：以台灣北部區域電子產業為例」，運輸計劃季刊，33（3）：577-602。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.胡太山，2005，「科技社群互動及其對生產與創新成效之影響」，國立台北大學都市計劃研究所博士論文：台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16.翁明祥，1978，「技術創新政策與事業經營策略的配合對技術創新績效之影響--台灣合成樹脂業實証研究」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文：台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.張在今，2005，「組織寬裕資源、創新與組織經營績效之關連性研究–以台灣電子產業為例」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文：台北。。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18.張元杰、陳明惠，2002，『創新系統』之知識觀點論：整合與挑戰。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19.黃文櫻，1990，「都市競爭力與製造業生產力關係之研究」，政治大學地政研究所碩士論文：台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20.黃俊英，2000，『多變量分析』，台北：翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21.遠見雜誌，2004，『2004年縣市總體競爭力大調查』，台北：天下遠見出版股份有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22.楊政龍、金家禾，2002，「知識設施空間分佈對台灣製造業生產與創新成效之影響」，『台灣土地研究』，4：101-124。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23.劉仁傑、巫茂熾，2002，「全球區域創新系統驅趨勢—中台灣區域創新研究」，『機械工業雜誌』，第236期：203-211。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24.劉珊芳，2006，「地方製造業生產力與創新績效之研究」，政治大學地政研究所碩士論文：台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25.邊泰明，1992，「台灣地區製造業都市化及地方化經濟分析」，『國立政治大學學報』，66：233-248。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26.Florida,A.著，2002，鄒應瑗譯，2003，『創意新貴』，台北：日月文化出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27.Florida,A.著，2005，傅振焜譯，2006，『創意新貴II：城市與創意階級』，台北：日月文化出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28.Porter,M.E.著，李明軒、邱如美合譯，1997，『國家競爭優勢』，台北：天下文化出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 29.Saxenian, A.著，1999，彭蕙仙、常雲鳳譯，『區域優勢 : 矽谷與一二八公路的文化與競爭』，台北：天下遠見出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1、Amin,A. and Thrift,N. ,1995, ”Globalisation,Institutional ‘Thickness’ and the Local Economy”, Managing Ciities：Singaapore.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2、Anselin, L. , Varga, A. , Acs, Z. ,1997,“Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations”, Journal of Urban Economics, 42：422-448.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3、Barney, J. ,1991, “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Manngement, 17（1）：99-120.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4、Begg, I. ,1999, “Cities and competitiveness.” Urban Studies,36（5-6）：791-793.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5、Belussi,F. ,1999, “Policies for the Development of Knowledge-intensive Local Production Systems”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(6)：729-747.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6、Boekholt, P. and van der Weele, E. ,1998, “Regional innovation system：The role of governances in a globalized world-southeast brabant：a regional innovation system in transition”, UCL Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7、Buesa, K. and Heijs, J. ,2004, “ Regional systems of innovation and the knowledge production function: the Spanish case”, Technovation：1-10.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8、Camagni, R. ,1991, “Innovation Networks. Spatial Perspectives”, London/New York: Belhaven.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9、Carbonara, N. ,2004, “Innovation processes within geographical clusters: a cognitive approach”, Technovation, 24：17-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10、Ciampi, C. A. ,1996, “Enhancing European competitiveness, Banca Nazionale di lavoro”, Quarterly Review, 197：143-164.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11、Clark, J. and Guy,K. ,1998, “Innovation and competitiveness”,Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10：363-395.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12、Coase,R. ,1960, ”The problem of social cost”, Journal of Law and Economics, 3：1-44.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13、Comelius, 2002, “The growth competitiveness index: Recent economic developments and the prospects for a sustained recovery. in: World Economic Forum, 2002.” Global Competitiveness Report. Geneve.：3–21.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14、Cooke, P.,Uranga, M. and Etexbarria, G. ,1997, “Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimension”, Research Policy, 26：475-491.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15、Cooke, P.,Uranga, M. and Etexbarria, G. ,1998, “Regional Systems of innovation：an evolutionary perspective”,Environment and Planning A.30(9)：1563-1584.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16、Edquist, C. ,1997, “Systems of Innovation : Technologies, Institutions and Organizations”, Chapter 1, London and Washington: Pinter.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17、Evangelista, R. , Iammarino,S. , Mastrostefano,V. , and Alberto,S. ,2002, “Looking for regional systems of innovation﹕evidence from the Italian innovation survey ,” Regional Studies 362：173-186.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18、European Commission, 2001, Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounts and Derived Indicators: A Methodological Guide, European Communities, Luxembourg.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19、Feldman, M. P.、Florida, R., 1994, “The Geographic Sources of Innovation: Technological Infrastructure and Product Innovation in the United States”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers , 84(2): 210-229.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20、Feldman, M. P.、Audretsch,D., 1999, “Innovation in Cities: Science-based, Diversity,Specialization and Localized Competition.”, European Economic Review, 43(2)：409-429.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21、Fischer, M. M., Varga, A., 2003,“Spatial Knowledge Spillovers and University Research: Evidence from Austria”, The Annals of Regional Science, 37： 303-322.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22、Forfas Institute, 2004, Innovation Networks, Forfas institute, http://www.forfas.ie/publications/_list/innovation.html(2007.9.30)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23、Freeman, C. ,1995, “The ‘National System of Innovation’ in Historical perspective.”, Cambridge Journal of economics, 19(1)：5-24.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24、Freeman, C. ,1987, “ Technology policy and economic performance: lesson from Japan.” London:Pinterzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25、Gerstlberger, W. ,2004, “Regional innovation systems and sustainability-selected examples of international discussion”, Technovation ,24：749-758.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26、Glaeser,E., Kall,D., Scheinkman,J., Shleifer,J. ,1992, ”Growth in Cities”, Journal of Political Economy, 100(6)：1126-1152.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27、Griliches, Z. , 1979, “Issue in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth.”, Bell Journal of Economics, 10: 92-116.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28、Gregersen,B. , Johnson,B. , 1991, “Learning Economics,Innovation Systems and European Integration”, Regional Studies, 31(5)：479-490.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 29、Hall,P. ,1999, “The Future of Cities”, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 23(2)：173-185.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 30、Henderson,V.,Kuncoro,A.,Turner,M.,1995, “Industrial Development in cities”, Journal of Political Economy, 103(5)：1067-1090.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 31、Holt,K. ,1983, “Product Innovation Management”, 2nd ed , London: Butter Worths.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 32、Industry Canada, 1995. Competitive: Concepts and Measures, Occasional Paper Number 5, Ottawa.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 33、Jaffe, A. B., 1989,“Real effects of academic research”, The American Economic Review, 79 (5)：957-970.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 34、Jaffe, A.B. , Trajtenberg. M, and Henderson, R. ,1993,“Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108：557-598.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 35、Kilne, S. and Rosenberg, S. ,1986, “An overview of innovation”, in Ralph Landau and Nathan Rosenberg（eds）, The positive sum strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 36、Kresl, P. K. ,1995, “The determinates of urban competitiveness : A Survey, in P.K. Kresl and G. Gappert（Eds）.” North Americal Cities and the Global Economy：45-68.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 37、Krugman, P. ,1996, “Urban concentration：the role of increasing returns and transport costs”, International Regional Science Review, 19：5-48.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 38、Love, J. H., Roper, S. ,2001,“Location and network effects on innovation success: evidence for UK, German and Irish manufacturing plants”, Research Policy, 30：643-661.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 39、Lundvall, B-A. ed., 1992, National systems of innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and interactive Learning, London: Pinter.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 40、Maskell, P. and Malmberg, A. , 1999,“Localised learning and industrial competitiveness”,Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23: 167-185.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 41、Malecki, E. J. , 2002 , “Hard and soft networks for urban competitiveness”, Urban Studies, 39（5-6）：929-945.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 42、Nelson, R. ,1995, “Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change” , Journal of Economic Literature, 33, March,：48-90.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 43、OECD ,1996, “Managing National Innovation Systems”, Paris.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 44、OECD ,1999, “Managing National Innovation Systems, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development”, Pariszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 45、Oerlemans, L. , Meeus, M. and Boekema, F. , 2000, “Innovation and proximity: theoretical perspectives.” ,Industrial networks and proximity.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 46、Reid, E. ,1995, “Virtual worlds: Culture and imagination. In S. Jones(ed.).”, Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community：164-183.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 47、Rothwell, R. ,1986, “The Role of Small Firms in Technological Innovation”, in Curran,J(ed), The Surrival of the Small Firm, London：Gower.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 48、Saxenian, A. ,1994 , “Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128.”, Harvard University Press,Camgridge,MA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 49、Schon, D.A. ,1967, “ Technology and Change.” ,Pergamon Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 50、Schumpeter, J. A. ,1934, “Theory of Economic Development”, Cambridge MA：Harvard Business Press,Camgridge,MA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 51、Stroper, M. ,1995, “The resurgence of regional economics, ten years latter: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies” , European Urban and Regional Studies, 2：161-221zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 52、Stalk, J. , Evans, P. and Sculman, L. E. ,1992, “Competing on capabilities: The new rules of corporate strategy.” , Harvard business review, 70(2)：57-69.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 53、Sternberg, R. , 2000 , “Innovation networks and regional development-Evidence from the European Regional Innovation Survey(ERIS)：Theoretical concepts, methodological approach, empirical basis and introduction to the theme issue”, European Planning Studies, 8：389-407.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 54、Zaltman, G. , Duncan, R. , and Holbek, J. ,1973, “Innovations and Organizations.” , NY: John Wiley and Sons.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 55、Zanakis, S. H. and Becerra-Fernandez, I. ,2005, “Competitiveness of nations: A knowledge discovery examination”, European Journal of Operational Research, 166：185-211.zh_TW