學術產出-會議論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 Liquidity Cost of Market Orders in Taiwan Stock Market: A Study based on An Order-Driven Agent-Based Artificial Stock Market
作者 陳樹衡; Huang, Yi-Ping ;Min-Chin Hung
Chen, Shu-Heng
貢獻者 政治大學經濟系
關鍵詞 Order-Driven; Liquidity; Transaction Cost
日期 2010.11
上傳時間 28-七月-2011 11:33:48 (UTC+8)
摘要 This thesis construct an order-driven artificial stock market base on Daniels et al.
     (2003) model. We also use autoregressive conditional duration (ACD) model initiated
     by Engle and Russell (1998) to model duration or order size. We analyzed the
     transaction cost of ten securities, including stocks, Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
     and Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), in Taiwan stock market and compared this
     result with the simulated cost of our models. We find that for those frequently traded
     securities, for example, TSMC (2330.TW) or China Steel (2002.TW), it is better not
     to incorporate ACD model of duration in the model, and for those not frequently
     traded securities, for example, President Chain Store (2912.TW) or Gallop No.1 Real
     Estate Investment Trust Fund (01008T.TW), it is better to incorporate ACD model of
     duration in the model. Our empirical estimates show that the liquidity costs of market
     order of these ten securities are generally smaller than 3%, and largely lied between
     -1% and 1%. We, however, find that simulation costs of market orders in our model,
     with a range from 0% to 10%, are generally larger than those of real data. One
     possible reason for this departure is that investors in stock markets generally do not
     place their orders blindly. They tend to wait for the appearance of opposite order size,
     and then place their orders. They also tend to split up a large order, and then reduce
     market impact. These behavior do not exist in our simulation. Regardless of these
     differences, our models may still be a simulation tool for transaction cost assessment
     when one would like to liquidate their asset in a short span of time.
關聯 Econophysics Colloquium 2010, Academic Sinica
資料類型 conference
dc.contributor 政治大學經濟系en_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳樹衡; Huang, Yi-Ping ;Min-Chin Hungzh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Shu-Heng-
dc.date (日期) 2010.11en_US
dc.date.accessioned 28-七月-2011 11:33:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 28-七月-2011 11:33:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 28-七月-2011 11:33:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50643-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This thesis construct an order-driven artificial stock market base on Daniels et al.
     (2003) model. We also use autoregressive conditional duration (ACD) model initiated
     by Engle and Russell (1998) to model duration or order size. We analyzed the
     transaction cost of ten securities, including stocks, Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
     and Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), in Taiwan stock market and compared this
     result with the simulated cost of our models. We find that for those frequently traded
     securities, for example, TSMC (2330.TW) or China Steel (2002.TW), it is better not
     to incorporate ACD model of duration in the model, and for those not frequently
     traded securities, for example, President Chain Store (2912.TW) or Gallop No.1 Real
     Estate Investment Trust Fund (01008T.TW), it is better to incorporate ACD model of
     duration in the model. Our empirical estimates show that the liquidity costs of market
     order of these ten securities are generally smaller than 3%, and largely lied between
     -1% and 1%. We, however, find that simulation costs of market orders in our model,
     with a range from 0% to 10%, are generally larger than those of real data. One
     possible reason for this departure is that investors in stock markets generally do not
     place their orders blindly. They tend to wait for the appearance of opposite order size,
     and then place their orders. They also tend to split up a large order, and then reduce
     market impact. These behavior do not exist in our simulation. Regardless of these
     differences, our models may still be a simulation tool for transaction cost assessment
     when one would like to liquidate their asset in a short span of time.
-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) Econophysics Colloquium 2010, Academic Sinicaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Order-Driven; Liquidity; Transaction Cost-
dc.title (題名) Liquidity Cost of Market Orders in Taiwan Stock Market: A Study based on An Order-Driven Agent-Based Artificial Stock Marketen_US
dc.type (資料類型) conferenceen