學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 超媒體模態對閱讀行為及理解的影響
The effects of modality on hypermedia navigation behavior and comprehension
作者 曾育慧
貢獻者 張寶芳
曾育慧
關鍵詞 超文本
多媒體
閱讀理解
表達模態
瀏覽行為
hypertext
multimedia
comprehension
modality
navigation
日期 2010
上傳時間 5-十月-2011 14:28:03 (UTC+8)
摘要 影片在網路內容中的比重日益增加,但超文本閱讀理解研究卻很少探討影片元素。本研究以實驗法探討超文本內容以不同表達模態(影片結合文字呈現、純文字呈現) 對理解及超文本大綱瀏覽行為的影響。
實驗以科普內容做為素材,招募81位大學生,隨機分配到實驗組及控制組:網頁影片結合文字組、網頁純文字組、紙本組三組,並要求受試者閱讀後以自由回憶(free recall)、概念圖寫下所看到的內容。接著,以Kintsch(1998)的建構-整合模式為基礎,建立文本中的巨觀命題與情境模式,並以命題分析法比對三組讀者回憶內容的差異。同時,也記錄網頁組二組受試者的瀏覽行為及時間。
研究結果發現,相同的內容,影片結合文字表達、及以純文字表達,就整體內容的巨觀命題、情境模式理解而言,二組讀者的理解並無差異。然而,若將影片、文字內容的巨觀命題理解分別統計,則發現收看影片結合文字組的受試者對影片內容的理解程度較高;若單就文字內容的理解進行分析,則發現收看網頁文字組的受試者對文字的理解程度較高。不同表達模態也影響讀者的瀏覽時間分配與瀏覽行為。當文字內容加入影片時,相較於純文字組,讀者在影片的瀏覽時間增加,文字內容瀏覽時間則較短。若內容只有文字單一表達模態,讀者會更依賴點選大綱及在頁面間點閱來幫助理解。文字組受試者的大綱瀏覽頻率、瀏覽總頁數高於影片結合文字組。
本研究同時對照網路與紙本不同媒介對讀者理解的影響。結果發現,此二媒介對讀者的巨觀命題理解無影響,但對讀者理解整體概念有影響,網路超文本的讀者,概念圖的回憶表現優於閱讀傳統紙本文字者。
參考文獻 Amadieu, F., Tricot, A., & Marin, C. (2009a). Interaction between prior knowledge and concept-map structure on hypertext comprehension, coherence of reading orders and disorientation. Interacting with Computers, In Press, Corrected Proof.
Amadieu, F., Tricot, A., & Marin, C. (2009b). Prior knowledge in learning from a non-linear electronic document: Disorientation and coherence of the reading sequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 381-388.
Anderson, J. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: W. H. Freeman and company.
Antonenko, P. D., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2010). The influence of leads on cognitive load and learning in a hypertext environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 140-150.
Bower, G., & Morrow, D. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science, 247(4938), 44.
Calisir, F., & Gurel, Z. (2003). Influence of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on reading comprehension, browsing and perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(2), 135-145.
Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 3-15.
Comscore (2008). More than 10 Billion Videos Viewed Online in the U.S. in February. Retrieved 2011.4.18: http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2008/04/US_Online_Video_Usage
ComScore (2010). YouTube Viewing Across Markets. Retrieved 2011.4.18: http://www.comscoredatamine.com/2010/09/youtube-viewing-hours-across-markets/
De Jong, T., & Van Der Geest, T. (2000). Characterizing web heuristics. Technical Communication, 47(3), 311-326.
De Jong, T., & Van der Hulst, A. (2002). The effects of graphical overviews on knowledge acquisition in hypertext. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(2), 219-231.
Dee-Lucas, D. (1996). Effects of overview structure on study strategies and text representations for instructional hypertext. Hypertext and cognition, 73-107.
DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1616-1641.
Dillon, A. (2005). Multimedia Learning with Hypermedia The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 569-585). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an Educational Technology: A Review of the Quantitative Research Literature on Learner Comprehension, Control, and Style. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322-349.
Eysenck, M., & Keane, M. (2003). 認知心理學 (李素卿, Trans.). 台北: 五南.
Foltz, W. P. (1996). Comprehension, Coherence and Strategies in Hypertext and Linear Text. In Jean-Francois Rouet & e. al (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 109-136): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2000). Individual Differences, Hypermedia Navigation,and Learning: An Empirical Study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 281-311.
Foss, C. L. (1989). Tools for reading and browsing hypertext. Information Processing Management, 25(4), 407-418.
Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning: Little, Brown Boston.
Graesser, McNamara, D., & Louwerse, M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text. Rethinking reading comprehension, 82-98.
Hatch, T., & Grossman, P. (2009). Learning to Look Beyond the Boundaries of Representation: Using Technology to Examine. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 70-85.
Herman, D. (2004a). Story logic: Problems and possibilities of narrative: Univ of Nebraska Pr.
Herman, D. (2004b). Toward a transmedial narratology. In M.-L. Ryan (Ed.), Narrative across media: the languages of storytelling: Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
Hofman, R., & van Oostendorp, H. (2002). Cognitive effects of a structural overview in a hypertext. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 129-140.
Kaltenbacher, M. (2004). Perspectives on Multimodality: From the early beginnings to the state of the art. [Article]. Information Design Journal & Document Design, 12, 190-207.
Kamalski, J., Sanders, T., & Lentz, L. (2008). Coherence Marking, Prior Knowledge, and Comprehension of Informative and Persuasive Texts: Sorting Things Out. [Article]. Discourse Processes, 45, 323-345.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Koehler, M., Yadav, A., Phillips, M., & Cavazos-Kottke, S. (2005). What is video good for? Examining how media and story genre interact. Journal of Education Multimedia and Hypermedia, 14(3), 249-272.
Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with Media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179.
Kress, G. (1997). Visual and Verbal Modes of Representation in Electronically Mediated Communication: The Potentials of New Forms of Text. Page to Screen: Taking Literacy into the Electronic Era. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Kress, G. (2004). Reading images: Multimodality, representation and new media. [Article]. Information Design Journal & Document Design, 12, 110-119.
Leonard, N. H., Scholl, R. W., & Kowalski, K. B. (1999). Information processing style and decision making. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(3), 407-420.
Locatis, C., Letourneau, G., & Banvard, R. (1989). Hypermedia and instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37, 65-77.
Low, R., & Sweller, J. (2005). The modality principle in multimedia learning The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 147–158). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125-139.
Mayer (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, & Gallini, J. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 715-726.
Mayer, R. (2005). Introduction to multimedia learning The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 1-16). New York: Cambridge University Press.
McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. (1996). Disorientation in hypertext: The effects of three text structures on navigation performance. Applied Ergonomics, 27(1), 61-68.
McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. (1998). Navigation in hyperspace: An evaluation of the effects of navigational tools and subject matter expertise on browsing and information retrieval in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 10(2), 129-142.
McNamara, D., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 247-288.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358-368.
Narvaez, D., van den Broek, P., & Ruiz, A. (1999). The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 488-496.
Nilsson, R. M., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). The effects of graphic organizers giving cues to the structure of a hypertext document on users` navigation strategies and performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(1), 1-26.
Potelle, H., & Rouet, J.-F. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers` prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(3), 327-345.
Protopsaltis, A., & Bouki, V. (2005). Towards a hypertext reading/comprehension model. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 23rd annual international conference on Design of communication: documenting and designing for pervasive information.
Reimann, P. (2003). Multimedia learning: beyond modality. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 245-252.
Rouet (1992). Cognitive processing of hyperdocuments: when does nonlinearity help? Paper presented at the ACM conference on Hypertext, Milan, Italy.
Rouet, & Potelle (2005). Navigational principles in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 297-312). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ryan, M.-L. (2001). Can Coherence be saved? Selective Interactivity and Narrativity Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media (pp. 242-271): Johns Hopkins University Press.
Salmeron, L., Baccino, T., Canas, J. J., Madrid, R. I., & Fajardo, I. (2009). Do graphical overviews facilitate or hinder comprehension in hypertext? Computers & Education, 53(4), 1308-1319.
Salmeron, L., Canas, J. J., Kintsch, W., & Fajardo, I. (2005). Reading Strategies and Hypertext Comprehension. [Article]. Discourse Processes, 40, 171-191.
Salmeron, L., Kintsch, W., & Canas, J. (2006). Coherence or interest as basis for improving hypertext comprehension. Paper presented at the Information Design Journal (IDJ). from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=21327151&lang=zh-tw&site=ehost-live
Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 285-307.
Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 49-69). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141-156.
Sundar, S. (2000). Multimedia effects on processing and perception of online news: A study of picture, audio, and video downloads. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 480-499.
Sweller, J. (2005). The redundancy principle in multimedia learning Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 159–168). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tripp, S. D., & Roby, W. (1990). orientation and disorientation in hypertext lexicon. Journal of computer based instruction, 17(120-124).
Vaughan, M., & Dillon, A. (2006). Why structure and genre matter for users of digital information: A longitudinal experiment with readers of a web-based newspaper. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(6), 502-526.
Zwaan, R. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2006). Discourse Comprehension. In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2 ed., pp. 725-756): Elsevier Science & Technology.
李金鈴 (2008). 教師多媒體教學的呈現方式對低年級學童學習成效的影響---以動植物學習為例. 國立新竹教育大學, 新竹.
汪曼穎, & 王林宇 (2006). 注意力分配對圖像登錄之影響及其在教學上的應用方向. 教育心理學報, 38(1), 67-83.
林達森 (2003). 概念圖的理論基礎與運用實務. 花蓮師院學報, 17, 107-132.
施駿宏 (2009). 多媒體呈現方式與空間能力對國二學生「地震」與「海嘯」學習結果之影響. 國立中正大學, 嘉義.
徐易稜 (2001). 多媒體呈現方式對學習者認知負荷與學習成效之影響研究. 國立中央大學, 桃園.
陳烜之 (2007). 認知心理學. 台北: 五南.
陳雅惠 (2008). 探詢數位時代中敘事與媒介之關係. Paper presented at the 中華傳播學會年會.
陳綱佩, 張寶芳, & 洪瑞雲 (2007). 科學報導的閱讀理解與隱喻的角色. 中華傳播學刊, 11, 71-109.
陳韻如 (2003). 超文本資訊架構與閱聽人溝通脈絡、時間序列對於手持小螢幕瀏覽之影響. 國立交通大學, 新竹.
陳韻如, 林幼唯, & 陳建文 (2001). 電子報介面呈現方式對閱讀成效與使用態度之影響. Paper presented at the 中華傳播學會年會.
鍾蔚文 (1992). 從媒介真實到主觀真實: 正中書局. 流傳文化. 墨文堂文化.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
新聞研究所
97451007
99
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097451007
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 張寶芳zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 曾育慧zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 曾育慧zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 5-十月-2011 14:28:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 5-十月-2011 14:28:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-十月-2011 14:28:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0097451007en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51174-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 新聞研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97451007zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 影片在網路內容中的比重日益增加,但超文本閱讀理解研究卻很少探討影片元素。本研究以實驗法探討超文本內容以不同表達模態(影片結合文字呈現、純文字呈現) 對理解及超文本大綱瀏覽行為的影響。
實驗以科普內容做為素材,招募81位大學生,隨機分配到實驗組及控制組:網頁影片結合文字組、網頁純文字組、紙本組三組,並要求受試者閱讀後以自由回憶(free recall)、概念圖寫下所看到的內容。接著,以Kintsch(1998)的建構-整合模式為基礎,建立文本中的巨觀命題與情境模式,並以命題分析法比對三組讀者回憶內容的差異。同時,也記錄網頁組二組受試者的瀏覽行為及時間。
研究結果發現,相同的內容,影片結合文字表達、及以純文字表達,就整體內容的巨觀命題、情境模式理解而言,二組讀者的理解並無差異。然而,若將影片、文字內容的巨觀命題理解分別統計,則發現收看影片結合文字組的受試者對影片內容的理解程度較高;若單就文字內容的理解進行分析,則發現收看網頁文字組的受試者對文字的理解程度較高。不同表達模態也影響讀者的瀏覽時間分配與瀏覽行為。當文字內容加入影片時,相較於純文字組,讀者在影片的瀏覽時間增加,文字內容瀏覽時間則較短。若內容只有文字單一表達模態,讀者會更依賴點選大綱及在頁面間點閱來幫助理解。文字組受試者的大綱瀏覽頻率、瀏覽總頁數高於影片結合文字組。
本研究同時對照網路與紙本不同媒介對讀者理解的影響。結果發現,此二媒介對讀者的巨觀命題理解無影響,但對讀者理解整體概念有影響,網路超文本的讀者,概念圖的回憶表現優於閱讀傳統紙本文字者。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 壹、 緒論 1
一、 研究背景與目的 1
貳、 文獻探討 4
一、 超媒體 4
二、 理解 6
三、 多媒體與理解 9
四、 超文本與理解 14
五、 超文本大綱與理解 20
六、 研究架構與假說 26
參、 研究方法 28
一、 實驗文本設計 28
二、 變項操作定義 30
三、 實驗設計及流程 35
肆、 資料分析結果 37
一、 巨觀命題理解 37
二、 情境模式與概念圖 41
三、 瀏覽時間 41
四、 瀏覽行為 44
五、 小結 45
伍、 結論與討論 47
一、 研究發現與討論 47
二、 研究限制 51
三、 未來研究建議 52
陸、 參考資料 56
附錄一:實驗流程圖 65
附錄二:實驗說明 66
附錄三:受試者答題卷 68
附錄四:巨觀命題及情境模式編碼表 71
附錄五:影片/文字命題分類表 74
附錄六:受試者瀏覽記錄範例 75
附錄七:實驗網站文本 76
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097451007en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 超文本zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 多媒體zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 閱讀理解zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 表達模態zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 瀏覽行為zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) hypertexten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) multimediaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) comprehensionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) modalityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) navigationen_US
dc.title (題名) 超媒體模態對閱讀行為及理解的影響zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The effects of modality on hypermedia navigation behavior and comprehensionen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Amadieu, F., Tricot, A., & Marin, C. (2009a). Interaction between prior knowledge and concept-map structure on hypertext comprehension, coherence of reading orders and disorientation. Interacting with Computers, In Press, Corrected Proof.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Amadieu, F., Tricot, A., & Marin, C. (2009b). Prior knowledge in learning from a non-linear electronic document: Disorientation and coherence of the reading sequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 381-388.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anderson, J. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: W. H. Freeman and company.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Antonenko, P. D., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2010). The influence of leads on cognitive load and learning in a hypertext environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 140-150.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bower, G., & Morrow, D. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science, 247(4938), 44.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Calisir, F., & Gurel, Z. (2003). Influence of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on reading comprehension, browsing and perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(2), 135-145.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 3-15.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Comscore (2008). More than 10 Billion Videos Viewed Online in the U.S. in February. Retrieved 2011.4.18: http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2008/04/US_Online_Video_Usagezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ComScore (2010). YouTube Viewing Across Markets. Retrieved 2011.4.18: http://www.comscoredatamine.com/2010/09/youtube-viewing-hours-across-markets/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) De Jong, T., & Van Der Geest, T. (2000). Characterizing web heuristics. Technical Communication, 47(3), 311-326.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) De Jong, T., & Van der Hulst, A. (2002). The effects of graphical overviews on knowledge acquisition in hypertext. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(2), 219-231.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dee-Lucas, D. (1996). Effects of overview structure on study strategies and text representations for instructional hypertext. Hypertext and cognition, 73-107.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1616-1641.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dillon, A. (2005). Multimedia Learning with Hypermedia The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 569-585). New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an Educational Technology: A Review of the Quantitative Research Literature on Learner Comprehension, Control, and Style. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322-349.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eysenck, M., & Keane, M. (2003). 認知心理學 (李素卿, Trans.). 台北: 五南.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Foltz, W. P. (1996). Comprehension, Coherence and Strategies in Hypertext and Linear Text. In Jean-Francois Rouet & e. al (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 109-136): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2000). Individual Differences, Hypermedia Navigation,and Learning: An Empirical Study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 281-311.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Foss, C. L. (1989). Tools for reading and browsing hypertext. Information Processing Management, 25(4), 407-418.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning: Little, Brown Boston.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Graesser, McNamara, D., & Louwerse, M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text. Rethinking reading comprehension, 82-98.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hatch, T., & Grossman, P. (2009). Learning to Look Beyond the Boundaries of Representation: Using Technology to Examine. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 70-85.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Herman, D. (2004a). Story logic: Problems and possibilities of narrative: Univ of Nebraska Pr.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Herman, D. (2004b). Toward a transmedial narratology. In M.-L. Ryan (Ed.), Narrative across media: the languages of storytelling: Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hofman, R., & van Oostendorp, H. (2002). Cognitive effects of a structural overview in a hypertext. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 129-140.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kaltenbacher, M. (2004). Perspectives on Multimodality: From the early beginnings to the state of the art. [Article]. Information Design Journal & Document Design, 12, 190-207.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kamalski, J., Sanders, T., & Lentz, L. (2008). Coherence Marking, Prior Knowledge, and Comprehension of Informative and Persuasive Texts: Sorting Things Out. [Article]. Discourse Processes, 45, 323-345.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Koehler, M., Yadav, A., Phillips, M., & Cavazos-Kottke, S. (2005). What is video good for? Examining how media and story genre interact. Journal of Education Multimedia and Hypermedia, 14(3), 249-272.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with Media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kress, G. (1997). Visual and Verbal Modes of Representation in Electronically Mediated Communication: The Potentials of New Forms of Text. Page to Screen: Taking Literacy into the Electronic Era. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kress, G. (2004). Reading images: Multimodality, representation and new media. [Article]. Information Design Journal & Document Design, 12, 110-119.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Leonard, N. H., Scholl, R. W., & Kowalski, K. B. (1999). Information processing style and decision making. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(3), 407-420.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Locatis, C., Letourneau, G., & Banvard, R. (1989). Hypermedia and instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37, 65-77.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Low, R., & Sweller, J. (2005). The modality principle in multimedia learning The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 147–158). New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mayer (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125-139.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mayer (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mayer, & Gallini, J. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 715-726.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mayer, R. (2005). Introduction to multimedia learning The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 1-16). New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. (1996). Disorientation in hypertext: The effects of three text structures on navigation performance. Applied Ergonomics, 27(1), 61-68.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. (1998). Navigation in hyperspace: An evaluation of the effects of navigational tools and subject matter expertise on browsing and information retrieval in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 10(2), 129-142.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McNamara, D., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 247-288.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358-368.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Narvaez, D., van den Broek, P., & Ruiz, A. (1999). The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 488-496.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nilsson, R. M., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). The effects of graphic organizers giving cues to the structure of a hypertext document on users` navigation strategies and performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(1), 1-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Potelle, H., & Rouet, J.-F. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers` prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(3), 327-345.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Protopsaltis, A., & Bouki, V. (2005). Towards a hypertext reading/comprehension model. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 23rd annual international conference on Design of communication: documenting and designing for pervasive information.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reimann, P. (2003). Multimedia learning: beyond modality. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 245-252.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rouet (1992). Cognitive processing of hyperdocuments: when does nonlinearity help? Paper presented at the ACM conference on Hypertext, Milan, Italy.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rouet, & Potelle (2005). Navigational principles in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 297-312). New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ryan, M.-L. (2001). Can Coherence be saved? Selective Interactivity and Narrativity Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media (pp. 242-271): Johns Hopkins University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Salmeron, L., Baccino, T., Canas, J. J., Madrid, R. I., & Fajardo, I. (2009). Do graphical overviews facilitate or hinder comprehension in hypertext? Computers & Education, 53(4), 1308-1319.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Salmeron, L., Canas, J. J., Kintsch, W., & Fajardo, I. (2005). Reading Strategies and Hypertext Comprehension. [Article]. Discourse Processes, 40, 171-191.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Salmeron, L., Kintsch, W., & Canas, J. (2006). Coherence or interest as basis for improving hypertext comprehension. Paper presented at the Information Design Journal (IDJ). from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=21327151&lang=zh-tw&site=ehost-livezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 285-307.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 49-69). New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141-156.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sundar, S. (2000). Multimedia effects on processing and perception of online news: A study of picture, audio, and video downloads. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 480-499.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sweller, J. (2005). The redundancy principle in multimedia learning Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 159–168). New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tripp, S. D., & Roby, W. (1990). orientation and disorientation in hypertext lexicon. Journal of computer based instruction, 17(120-124).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vaughan, M., & Dillon, A. (2006). Why structure and genre matter for users of digital information: A longitudinal experiment with readers of a web-based newspaper. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(6), 502-526.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zwaan, R. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2006). Discourse Comprehension. In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2 ed., pp. 725-756): Elsevier Science & Technology.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李金鈴 (2008). 教師多媒體教學的呈現方式對低年級學童學習成效的影響---以動植物學習為例. 國立新竹教育大學, 新竹.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 汪曼穎, & 王林宇 (2006). 注意力分配對圖像登錄之影響及其在教學上的應用方向. 教育心理學報, 38(1), 67-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林達森 (2003). 概念圖的理論基礎與運用實務. 花蓮師院學報, 17, 107-132.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 施駿宏 (2009). 多媒體呈現方式與空間能力對國二學生「地震」與「海嘯」學習結果之影響. 國立中正大學, 嘉義.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐易稜 (2001). 多媒體呈現方式對學習者認知負荷與學習成效之影響研究. 國立中央大學, 桃園.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳烜之 (2007). 認知心理學. 台北: 五南.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳雅惠 (2008). 探詢數位時代中敘事與媒介之關係. Paper presented at the 中華傳播學會年會.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳綱佩, 張寶芳, & 洪瑞雲 (2007). 科學報導的閱讀理解與隱喻的角色. 中華傳播學刊, 11, 71-109.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳韻如 (2003). 超文本資訊架構與閱聽人溝通脈絡、時間序列對於手持小螢幕瀏覽之影響. 國立交通大學, 新竹.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳韻如, 林幼唯, & 陳建文 (2001). 電子報介面呈現方式對閱讀成效與使用態度之影響. Paper presented at the 中華傳播學會年會.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鍾蔚文 (1992). 從媒介真實到主觀真實: 正中書局. 流傳文化. 墨文堂文化.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) zh_TW