| dc.contributor.advisor | 賴育邦 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Lai, Yu-Bong | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (作者) | 劉姿妤 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (作者) | Liu, Tzu-Yu | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 劉姿妤 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Liu, Tzu-Yu | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2010 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 5-十月-2011 14:52:36 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 5-十月-2011 14:52:36 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 5-十月-2011 14:52:36 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) | G0098255016 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51394 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 財政研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 98255016 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 99 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 許多策略性環境政策的相關文獻，大多在探討生產外部性的問題，較少著墨在消費的外部性，且在模型設定上，大多假設廠商生產同質性商品，因此本文將商品之差異性納入考量，在單邊貿易模型之下，建立一個兩階段賽局，來探討消費外部性的情況下，廠商與政府的策略性行為。而本文亦將貿易政策與環境政策做連結，探討當關稅因貿易自由化而調降時，對環境政策與環境品質的影響為何。本研究發現：(1) 不論廠商的競爭型態為何，政府會將最適污染稅稅率訂在低於污染所造成的邊際環境損害之水準。(2) 不論廠商的競爭型態為何，貿易自由化會提升最適污染稅稅率。(3) 在廠商進行 Cournot 競爭時，貿易自由化將提升環境品質。(4) 在廠商進行 Bertrand 競爭時，關稅調降與否，須考量商品間的替代程度，在商品替代程度很低時，貿易自由化的結果將使環境品質向下沉淪。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This thesis develops a two-stage game to investigate the strategies of government and firms concerning negative externalities associated with consumption. It also discusses the linkages between trade liberalization and environmental policy, namely, the effect of tariff reduction due to trade liberalization on environmental policy and environmental quality. Most of the literature on strategic environmental policy only considers negative externalities associated with production, but this thesis deals with negative externalities associated with consumption.Several conclusions emerge: First, the optimal pollution tax is less than the marginal pollution damage. Second, the environmental tax increases as a consequence of a tariff reduction. Third, if firms compete in terms of quantity, environmental quality could be improved by liberalizing trade. Finally, if firms compete in terms of price, when the degree of goods substitutability is low, trade liberalization may lead to a “race to the bottom” in environmental quality. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究方法 2 第三節 本文架構 3第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 策略性貿易政策 4 第二節 策略性環境政策 5 第三節 策略性貿易與環境政策 6第三章 Cournot 競爭下最適環境政策之探討 9 第一節 基本模型設定 9 第二節 廠商行為 11 第三節 政府之策略性行為 13 第四節 貿易自由化對環境政策的影響 15第四章 Bertrand 競爭下最適環境政策之探討 18 第一節 廠商行為 18 第二節 政府之策略性行為 20 第三節 貿易自由化對環境政策的影響 21第五章 Cournot 競爭與 Bertrand 競爭之比較 24第六章 結論 27附錄 29參考文獻 34表次表 5-1 Cournot 競爭及 Bertrand 競爭之比較 25表 5-2 貿易自由化對 Cournot 競爭及 Bertrand 競爭之影響 26 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098255016 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 貿易自由化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 污染稅 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 消費外部性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | trade liberalization | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | environmental tax | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | consumption externality | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 貿易自由化下最適環境政策 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | The effects of trade liberalization on environmental policy | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Barrett, S. (1994), “Strategic Environmental Policy and International Trade,” Journal of Public Economics, 54, 325-338. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bowley, A. L. (1924), The Mathematical Groundwork of Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brander, J. A. (1981), “Intra-industry Trade in Identical Commodities,” Journal of International Economics, 11, 1–14. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brander, J. A. and B. J. Spencer (1984a), Tariff Protection and Imperfect Competetion, in H. Kierzkowski (ed.), Monopolistic Competition and International Trade, Oxford: Clarendon Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brander, J. A. and B. J. Spencer (1984b), “Trade Warfare: Tariffs and Cartels,” Journal of International Economics, 16, 227-242. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brander, J. A. and B. J. Spencer (1985), “Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry,” Journal of International Economics, 18, 83-100. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Conrad, K. (1993), “Taxes and Subsidies for Pollution-Intensive Industries as Trade Policy,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25, 121-135. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Conrad, K. (1996), Choosing Emission Taxes under International Price Competition, in C. Carraro, Y. Katsoulacos and A. Xepapadeas (eds.), Environmental Policy and Market Structure, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 85-98. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lai, Y.-B. (2004), “Trade Liberalization, Consumption Externalities and the Environment,” Economics Bulletin, 17, 1-9. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kennedy, P. W. (1994), “Equilibrium Pollution Taxes in Open Economies with Imperfect Competition,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 49-63. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rauscher, M. (1994), “On Ecological Dumping,” Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 822-840. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ricardo, D. (1817), The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, London: John Murray. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Smith A. (1776), The Wealth of Nations, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tanguay, G. A. (2001), “Strategic Environmental Policies under International Doupolistic Competition,” International Tax and Public Finance, 8, 793-811. | zh_TW |
