1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 外國語文學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 台灣以中文為母語的小孩的誘發過度泛化現象
Priming overextensions in Taiwan Mandarin children
作者 陳采君
Chen, Tsai Chun
貢獻者 萬依萍
Wan, I Ping
陳采君
Chen, Tsai Chun
關鍵詞 誘發
過度泛化
語言發展
幼兒
中文
詞彙
Priming
overextension
language development
children
Mandarin Chinese
lexicon
日期 2011
上傳時間 17-四月-2012 09:05:34 (UTC+8)
摘要 本篇研究的目的是要去比較中文跟英文小孩的誘發過度泛化現象的不同之處。誘發過度泛化現象指的是小孩子因為受到之前誘發過的字的影響進而造成對物品過度泛化現象的情況而稱之。Gershkoff-Stowe et al. (2006) 認為Dell (1986) 提出的擴散激活機制 (spreading activation mechanisms) 可用來解釋小孩的三種泛化錯誤類型: 類別錯誤 (category errors) 、語用錯誤 (pragmatic errors) 跟提取錯誤 (retrieval errors)，此三種泛化錯誤的基底機制應該都是同樣的。另外，他們也認為最近激活跟形狀的類似對小孩的命名應該都扮演了很重要的角色。年紀較大的小孩也應該會擁有比較成熟的心理詞彙所以會比起年紀較小的小孩比較不容易受到之前提取過的字的影響。因為中文跟英文心理詞彙的不同，我們想去檢視是否一樣的理論也可套用在中文小孩身上。實驗方法沿用了Gershkoff-Stowe et al. (2006)的相同實驗法，做了與他相同的兩個實驗。第一個實驗是熟悉物與不熟悉物的命名，兩歲小孩要做六次的試驗，然後我們是用三張圖片做為誘發圖片，然後請小孩去命名一個真實的物品。第二個實驗是虛構物品命名，我們在這個實驗裡比較兩歲小孩跟四歲小孩的不同表現。實驗過程跟實驗一是一樣的，只是實驗二是看虛構物品不是真實物品，且有八個試驗機會而不是六個。結果顯示有一個跟英文大致上類似的結果。然而我們仍有發現一些不同之處。第一，我們發現熟悉物在中文裡比起英文似乎有更強的力量。第二個則是兩個語言不同的構詞法可能會對於比較成熟的心理詞彙造成不一樣的誘發方式。
This purpose of this study is to compare the difference of priming overextension phenomena between Mandarin Chinese children and English children. Priming overextension means that children overextend some words due to the effects of the previously primed words. Gershkoff-Stowe et al. (2006) found that spreading activation mechanisms (Dell, 1986) should be the underlying mechanisms of three types of children’s overextension errors, i.e., category errors, pragmatic errors, and retrieval errors. Moreover, they thought that recent activation and perceptual similarity both play an important role on children’s object naming. Besides, older children should have a more mature mental lexicon and thus less susceptible to previously retrieved words than younger children. Due to the difference of the lexicon networks between Mandarin Chinese and English, we want to examine whether the same theory also could apply to Mandarin children. Two experiments which followed Gershkoff-Stowe et al. (2006) were conducted. The first one was familiar or unfamiliar object naming. 2-year-old Children underwent six trials and were primed by three pictures and then were asked to name a real object. The second experiment was novel object naming. We compared the performances of children aged 2 and aged 4 together. The procedure was the same as the experiment 1 despite the fact that children in experiment 2 named novel objects rather than real ones and they underwent 8 trials rather than six. And results showed a generally similar finding with English. However, there are still something different between these two languages. First, we found that familiar objects should have stronger strengths in Mandarin than in English. Second, different morphology in two languages may result in different priming way for more mature mental lexicons.
參考文獻 References
Anglin, J. M. (1977). Word, object, and conceptual development. New York: W. W.
Norton and Co.
Baldwin, D. A. (1989). Priorities in children’s expectations about object label
reference: Form over color. Child Development, 60, 1291 – 1306.
Baldwin, D. A. (1992). Clarifying the role of shape in children’s taxonomic
assumption. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 392 – 416.
Barrett, M. D. (1986). Early semantic representations and early word usage. In Stan A.
Kuczaj II and Martyn D. Barrett (eds.), The development of word meaning:
progress in cognitive development research (pp. 39-67). Berlin and New York:
Springer.
Barrett, M., Harris, M., & Chasin, J. (1991). Early lexical development and maternal
speech: a comparison of children’s initial and subsequent uses of words. Journal
of Child Language, 18, 21-40.
Bates, E., Bretherton, I., & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar:
Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge
University Press.
Benedict, H. (1979). Early lexical development: Comprehension and production.
Journal of Child Language, 6, 183-200.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image
understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115 – 147.
Billow, R. (1981). Observing spontaneous metaphor in children. Journal of
Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 430-445.
Bloom, L. (1973). One word at a time: The use of single word utterances before
syntax. The Hague: Mouton.
Bowerman, M. (1978). The acquisition of word meaning: an investigation of some
current conflicts. In Natalie Waterson and Catherine E. Snow (eds.), The
development of communication (pp. 263-287). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Braunwald, S. R. (1978). Context, word and meaning: toward a communicational
analysis of lexical acquisition. In Andrew Lock (ed.), Action, gesture and
symboll: the emergence of language (pp. 487-527). London: Academic Press.
Carey, S. (1982). Semantic development: the state of the art. In E. Wanner & L. R.
Gleitman (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Carlson, P., & Anisfeld, M. (1969). Some observations on the linguistic competence
of a two-year-old child. Child Development, 40, 565-575.
Charles-Luce, J., & Luce, P. A. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of words in young
children’s lexicons. Journal of Child Language, 17, 205-215.
Clark, E. V. (1973). What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his
first language. In T. E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of
language (pp.65-110). New York: Academic Press.
Clark, E.V. (1983). Meanings and concepts. In Handbook of child psychology, vol. 3:
Cognitive development, ed. J. Flavell and E. Markman. New York: Wiley.
Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.
Cohen, L. & Dehaene, S. (1998). Competition between past and present : assessment
and interpretation of verbal perseverations. Brain 121(9), 1641–59.
Corrigan, R. (1978). Language development as related to Stage 6 object permanence
development. Journal of Child Language, 5, 173-189.
Dapretto, M. & Bjork, E. L. (2000). The development of word retrieval abilities in
the second year and its relation to early vocabulary growth. Child Development
71(3),635–48.
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.
Psychological Review 93(3), 283–321.
Dell, G. S., Burger, L. K. & Svec, W. R. (1997). Language production and serial
order : a functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review 104(1), 123–47.
Dore, J. (1978). Conditions for the acquisition of speech acts. In I. Marikowa (Ed.),
The social context of language (pp. 87-111). New York: Wiley.
Dromi, E. (1987). Early lexical development. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge
University Press.
Feson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, S., Bates, E., Thal, D., Reilly, J., & Harthung, J. (1990).
MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: Technical Manual. San
Diego: San Diego State University.
Forster, K. I. & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.
Forster, K. I. (1990). Lexical processing. In D. N. Osherson & H. Lasnik (Eds.),
Language: An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 1, pp. 95-131). Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Fremgen, A., & Fay, D. (1980). Overextensions in production and comprehension: A
methodological clarification. Journal of Child Language, 7, 205-211.
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R. & Hyams, N. (2003) An introduction to language (7th ed.).
United States: Michael Rosenberg.
Gelman, S. A., Croft, W., Fu, P., Clausner, T. & Gottfried, G. (1998). Why is a
pomegranate an apple? The role of shape, taxonomic relatedness, and prior
lexical knowledge in children’s overextensions of apple and dog. Journal of
Child Language, 25(2), 267–91.
Gentner, D. (1983a). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus
natural partitioning. In S. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development: Vol. 2.
Language, thought, and culture (pp. 301-334). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gentner, D. (1983b). Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy.
Cognitive Science 7(2), 155–70.
Gershkoff-Stowe, L. (2001). The course of children’s naming errors in early word
learning. Journal of Cognition & Development 2(2), 131–55.
Gershkoff-Stowe, L., Connell, B. & Smith, L. (2006). Priming overgeneralizations in
two-and four-year-old children. Journal of child language 33, 461-486.
Gershkoff-Stowe, L. & Smith, L. B. (1997). A curvilinear trend in naming errors as a
function of early vocabulary growth. Cognitive Psychology 34(1), 37–71.
Gershkoff-Stowe, L. & Smith, L. B. (2004). Shape and the first hundred nouns. Child
Development, 75(4), 1098-1114.
Goldfield, B. A., & Reznick, J. S. (1990). Early lexical acquisition: Rate, content, and
the vocabulary spurt. Journal of Child Language, 17, 171-183.
Goldin-Meadow, S., Seligman, M. E., & Gelman, R. (1976). Language in the
two-year-old. Cognition, 4, 189-202.
Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. (1987). The development of categorization in the second
year and its relation to other cognitive and linguistic developments, Child
Development, 58, 1523-1531.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of
language. London: Edward Arnold.
Hoek, D., Ingram, D. & Gibson, D. (1986). Some possible causes of children’s early
word overextensions. Journal of Child Language 13(3), 477–94.
Huang, S. (1998). Chinese as a headless language in compounding morphology. In J.
L. Packard(Ed.), New approaches to Chinese word formation: Morphology,
phonology and the lexicon in modern and ancient Chinese (pp. 261_284). New
York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hudson, J., & Nelson, K. (1984). Play with language: Overextensions as analogies.
Journal of Child Language, 11, 337-346.
Huttenlocher, J. (1974). The origin of language comprehension. In R. L. Solso (ed.),
Theories in cognitive psychology – The Loyola Symposium. Potomac, MD:
Erlbaum.
Huttenlocher, J. & Kubicek, L. F. (1983). The source of relatedness effects on naming
latency. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory & Cognition
9(3), 486–96.
Imai, M., Gentner, D., & Uchida, N. (1994). Children’s theories of word meaning: the
role of shape similarity in early acquisition. Cognitive Development, 9, 45-75.
Ingram, D. (1978). Sensorimotor intelligence and language development. In A. Lock
(Ed.), Action, gesture, and symbol. New York: Academic Press.
Johnson, C. J., Paivio, A. & Clark, J. M. (1996). Cognitive components of picture
naming. Psychological Bulletin 120(1), 113–39.
Jones, S. S., Smith, L. B., & Landau, B. (1991). Object properties and knowledge in
early lexical learning. Child Development, 62, 449 – 516.
Khami, A. G. (1986). The elusive first words: the importance of the naming insight for
the development of referential speech. Journal of Child Language, 13, 155-161.
Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (1988). The importance of shape in early
lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3, 299-321.
Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (1998). Object shape, object function, and
object name. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 1-27.
Lifter, K., & Bloom, L. (1989). Object knowledge and the emergence of language.
Infant Behavior and Development, 12, 395-423.
Martin, N., Weisberg, R. W. & Saffran, E. M. (1989). Variables influencing the
occurrence of naming errors : implications for models of lexical retrieval.
Journal of Memory & Language 28(4), 462–85.
McShane, J. (1980). Learning to talk. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Mok, L. W. (2009). Word superiority effect as a function of semantic transparency of
Chinese bimorphemic compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(7), 1039-1081.
Naigles, L. & Gelman, S. (1995). Overextensions in comprehension and production
revisited : preferential-looking in a study of dog, cat, and cow. Journal of Child
Language, 22(1), 19–46.
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the
Society for Research in Child Development, 38 (Serial No. 149).
Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word and sentence: interrelations in development.
Psychological Review, 81(4), 267–85.
Nelson, K. (1985). Making sense: The acquisition of shared meaning. New York:
Academic Press.
Nelson, K., Rescorla, L., Gruendel, J., & Benedict, H. (1978). Early lexicons: What
do they mean? Child Development, 49, 960-968.
Rapp, B. & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word
production. Psychological Review 107(3), 460–99.
Reich, P. A. (1976). The early acquisition of word meaning. Journal of Child
Language, 3, 117-123.
Rescorla, L. A. (1980a). Overextension in early language development. Journal of
Child Language, 7, 321-335.
Rescorla, L. A. (1980b). Category development in early language. Journal of Child
Language, 8, 225-238.
Samuelson, L. K., & Smith, L. B. (1999). Statistical regularities among count/mass
syntax, solidity, and category structure in early noun vocabularies. Cognition, 73,
1 – 33.
Samuelson, L. K. & Smith, L. B. (2005). They call it like they see it : spontaneous
naming and attention to shape. Developmental Science 8(2), 182–98.
Smith, L. B. (1989). A model of perceptual classification in children and adults.
Psychological Review, 96(1), 125-144.
Smith, L. B. (2005). From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: a role for
associative learning. Psychological Review, 112(2), 347-382.
Smith, L. B., & Heise, D. (1992). Perceptual similarity and conceptual structure. In B.
Burns & et al. (Eds.), Percepts, concepts and categories: The representation and
processing of information. (pp. 233-272). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-
Holland.
Smith, L. B., Jones, S. S., & Landau, B. (1992). Count nouns, adjectives, and
perceptual properties in children’s novel word interpretations. Developmental
Psychology, 28, 273 – 289.
Soja, N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S. (1991). Ontological categories guide young
children’s inductions of word meanings: Object terms and substance terms.
Cognition, 38, 179 – 211.
Stemberger, J. P. (1989). Speech errors in early child language production. Journal of
Memory and Language, 28, 164–88.
Thomson, J. R., and Chapman, R. (1977). Who is ‘Daddy’ revisited: the status of
two-year-olds’ over-extended words in use and comprehension. Journal of Child
Language, 4, 359-375.
Tomikawa & Dodd (1980). Early word meaning: Perceptually or functionally based?
Child Development, 51, 1103-1109.
Toyoda, E. & Scrimgoeour, A. (2009). Common and script-specific awareness in
relation to word recognition in English and Chinese. Language Awareness, 18(1),
61-73.
Vitkovitch, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (1993). On naming a giraffe a
zebra: Picture naming errors across different object categories. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 243-259.
Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (1983). The emergence of the literal-
metaphorical-anomalous distinction in young children. Child Development, 54,
154-161.
Wally, A. C. (1993). The role of vocabulary growth in children’s spoken word
recognition and segmentation ability. Developmental Review, 13, 286-350.
Winner, E. (1979). New names for old things: The emergence of metaphoric language.
Journal of Child Language, 6, 469-491.
Winner, E. (1988). The point of words : children’s understanding of metaphor and
irony. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
語言學研究所
97555011
100
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097555011
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 萬依萍zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Wan, I Pingen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 陳采君zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Chen, Tsai Chunen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳采君zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Tsai Chunen_US
dc.date (日期) 2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-四月-2012 09:05:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-四月-2012 09:05:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-四月-2012 09:05:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0097555011en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52706-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 語言學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97555011zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 100zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本篇研究的目的是要去比較中文跟英文小孩的誘發過度泛化現象的不同之處。誘發過度泛化現象指的是小孩子因為受到之前誘發過的字的影響進而造成對物品過度泛化現象的情況而稱之。Gershkoff-Stowe et al. (2006) 認為Dell (1986) 提出的擴散激活機制 (spreading activation mechanisms) 可用來解釋小孩的三種泛化錯誤類型: 類別錯誤 (category errors) 、語用錯誤 (pragmatic errors) 跟提取錯誤 (retrieval errors)，此三種泛化錯誤的基底機制應該都是同樣的。另外，他們也認為最近激活跟形狀的類似對小孩的命名應該都扮演了很重要的角色。年紀較大的小孩也應該會擁有比較成熟的心理詞彙所以會比起年紀較小的小孩比較不容易受到之前提取過的字的影響。因為中文跟英文心理詞彙的不同，我們想去檢視是否一樣的理論也可套用在中文小孩身上。實驗方法沿用了Gershkoff-Stowe et al. (2006)的相同實驗法，做了與他相同的兩個實驗。第一個實驗是熟悉物與不熟悉物的命名，兩歲小孩要做六次的試驗，然後我們是用三張圖片做為誘發圖片，然後請小孩去命名一個真實的物品。第二個實驗是虛構物品命名，我們在這個實驗裡比較兩歲小孩跟四歲小孩的不同表現。實驗過程跟實驗一是一樣的，只是實驗二是看虛構物品不是真實物品，且有八個試驗機會而不是六個。結果顯示有一個跟英文大致上類似的結果。然而我們仍有發現一些不同之處。第一，我們發現熟悉物在中文裡比起英文似乎有更強的力量。第二個則是兩個語言不同的構詞法可能會對於比較成熟的心理詞彙造成不一樣的誘發方式。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This purpose of this study is to compare the difference of priming overextension phenomena between Mandarin Chinese children and English children. Priming overextension means that children overextend some words due to the effects of the previously primed words. Gershkoff-Stowe et al. (2006) found that spreading activation mechanisms (Dell, 1986) should be the underlying mechanisms of three types of children’s overextension errors, i.e., category errors, pragmatic errors, and retrieval errors. Moreover, they thought that recent activation and perceptual similarity both play an important role on children’s object naming. Besides, older children should have a more mature mental lexicon and thus less susceptible to previously retrieved words than younger children. Due to the difference of the lexicon networks between Mandarin Chinese and English, we want to examine whether the same theory also could apply to Mandarin children. Two experiments which followed Gershkoff-Stowe et al. (2006) were conducted. The first one was familiar or unfamiliar object naming. 2-year-old Children underwent six trials and were primed by three pictures and then were asked to name a real object. The second experiment was novel object naming. We compared the performances of children aged 2 and aged 4 together. The procedure was the same as the experiment 1 despite the fact that children in experiment 2 named novel objects rather than real ones and they underwent 8 trials rather than six. And results showed a generally similar finding with English. However, there are still something different between these two languages. First, we found that familiar objects should have stronger strengths in Mandarin than in English. Second, different morphology in two languages may result in different priming way for more mature mental lexicons.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents TABLE OF CONTENTS




Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………...iv
Chinese Abstract…………………………………………………………………….viii
English Abstract……………………………………………………………………….x
Chapter
1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………..1
2. Literature Review……………...…………………………………………………..8
2.0 Introduction……………………………………………………………………8
2.1 Three Types of Errors………………………………………………………….8
2.1.1 Category Errors……………………………………………………….....9
2.1.2 Pragmatic Errors……………………………………………………......15
2.1.3 Retrieval Errors………………………………………………………...20
2.2 Comprehension and Production Problems…………………………………...24
2.3 Shape bias…………………………………………………………………….27
2.4 The Study in Gershkoff-Stowe, Connell, and Smith (2006)…………………30
2.5 Characteristics of Mandarin Chinese………………………………………...40
2.6 Summary……………..………………………………………………………42
3. Methodology……………………………………………………………………..45
3.1 Experiment 1………...……………………………………………………….45
3.1.1 Procedure…………………………………………………………….....47
3.1.2 Subjects.………………………………………………………………..48
3.1.3 Materials………………………………………………………………..48
3.1.4 Coding………………………………………………………………….50
3.1.5 Adults’ Similarity Judgments………..…………………………………52
3.1.6 Word comprehension…………………………………………………...53
3.2 Experiment 2…………………………………………………………………54
3.2.1 Procedure…………………………………………………………….....55
3.2.2 Subjects………………………………………………………………...55
3.2.3 Materials………………………………………………………………..56
3.2.4 Coding………………………………………………………………….57
4. Results and Discussion…………….....…………………………………………..59
4.1 Children’s Word Comprehension and Production in Experiment 1………….59
4.2 Object Naming in Experiment 1……………………………………………...61
4.3 Priming Effects in Experiment 1……………………………………………..64
4.4 Novel Object Naming in Experiment 2………………………………………69
4.5 Priming Effects in Experiment 2……………………………………………..77
4.6 Perseverative Naming in Experiment 2………………………………………78
4.7 Summary……………………………………………………………………..81
5. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………83
References……………………………………………………………………………86
Appendix……………………………………………………………………………..97		zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097555011en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 誘發zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 過度泛化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 語言發展zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 幼兒zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中文zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 詞彙zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Primingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) overextensionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) language developmenten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) childrenen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Mandarin Chineseen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) lexiconen_US
dc.title (題名) 台灣以中文為母語的小孩的誘發過度泛化現象zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Priming overextensions in Taiwan Mandarin childrenen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Referenceszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anglin, J. M. (1977). Word, object, and conceptual development. New York: W. W.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Norton and Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baldwin, D. A. (1989). Priorities in children’s expectations about object labelzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) reference: Form over color. Child Development, 60, 1291 – 1306.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baldwin, D. A. (1992). Clarifying the role of shape in children’s taxonomiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) assumption. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 392 – 416.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barrett, M. D. (1986). Early semantic representations and early word usage. In Stan A.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kuczaj II and Martyn D. Barrett (eds.), The development of word meaning:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) progress in cognitive development research (pp. 39-67). Berlin and New York:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Springer.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barrett, M., Harris, M., & Chasin, J. (1991). Early lexical development and maternalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) speech: a comparison of children’s initial and subsequent uses of words. Journalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) of Child Language, 18, 21-40.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bates, E., Bretherton, I., & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridgezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Benedict, H. (1979). Early lexical development: Comprehension and production.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal of Child Language, 6, 183-200.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human imagezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115 – 147.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Billow, R. (1981). Observing spontaneous metaphor in children. Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 430-445.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bloom, L. (1973). One word at a time: The use of single word utterances beforezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) syntax. The Hague: Mouton.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bowerman, M. (1978). The acquisition of word meaning: an investigation of somezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) current conflicts. In Natalie Waterson and Catherine E. Snow (eds.), Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) development of communication (pp. 263-287). New York: John Wiley and Sons.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Braunwald, S. R. (1978). Context, word and meaning: toward a communicationalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) analysis of lexical acquisition. In Andrew Lock (ed.), Action, gesture andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) symboll: the emergence of language (pp. 487-527). London: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carey, S. (1982). Semantic development: the state of the art. In E. Wanner & L. R.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gleitman (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. New York:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carlson, P., & Anisfeld, M. (1969). Some observations on the linguistic competencezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) of a two-year-old child. Child Development, 40, 565-575.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Charles-Luce, J., & Luce, P. A. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of words in youngzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) children’s lexicons. Journal of Child Language, 17, 205-215.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Clark, E. V. (1973). What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in hiszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) first language. In T. E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) language (pp.65-110). New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Clark, E.V. (1983). Meanings and concepts. In Handbook of child psychology, vol. 3:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cognitive development, ed. J. Flavell and E. Markman. New York: Wiley.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cohen, L. & Dehaene, S. (1998). Competition between past and present : assessmentzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and interpretation of verbal perseverations. Brain 121(9), 1641–59.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Corrigan, R. (1978). Language development as related to Stage 6 object permanencezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) development. Journal of Child Language, 5, 173-189.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dapretto, M. & Bjork, E. L. (2000). The development of word retrieval abilities inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) the second year and its relation to early vocabulary growth. Child Developmentzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 71(3),635–48.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Psychological Review 93(3), 283–321.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dell, G. S., Burger, L. K. & Svec, W. R. (1997). Language production and serialzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) order : a functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review 104(1), 123–47.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dore, J. (1978). Conditions for the acquisition of speech acts. In I. Marikowa (Ed.),zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) The social context of language (pp. 87-111). New York: Wiley.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dromi, E. (1987). Early lexical development. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridgezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Feson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, S., Bates, E., Thal, D., Reilly, J., & Harthung, J. (1990).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: Technical Manual. Sanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Diego: San Diego State University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Forster, K. I. & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Forster, K. I. (1990). Lexical processing. In D. N. Osherson & H. Lasnik (Eds.),zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Language: An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 1, pp. 95-131). Cambridge,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) MA: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fremgen, A., & Fay, D. (1980). Overextensions in production and comprehension: Azh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) methodological clarification. Journal of Child Language, 7, 205-211.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fromkin, V., Rodman, R. & Hyams, N. (2003) An introduction to language (7th ed.).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) United States: Michael Rosenberg.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gelman, S. A., Croft, W., Fu, P., Clausner, T. & Gottfried, G. (1998). Why is azh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) pomegranate an apple? The role of shape, taxonomic relatedness, and priorzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) lexical knowledge in children’s overextensions of apple and dog. Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Child Language, 25(2), 267–91.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gentner, D. (1983a). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versuszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) natural partitioning. In S. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development: Vol. 2.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Language, thought, and culture (pp. 301-334). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gentner, D. (1983b). Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cognitive Science 7(2), 155–70.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gershkoff-Stowe, L. (2001). The course of children’s naming errors in early wordzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) learning. Journal of Cognition & Development 2(2), 131–55.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gershkoff-Stowe, L., Connell, B. & Smith, L. (2006). Priming overgeneralizations inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) two-and four-year-old children. Journal of child language 33, 461-486.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gershkoff-Stowe, L. & Smith, L. B. (1997). A curvilinear trend in naming errors as azh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) function of early vocabulary growth. Cognitive Psychology 34(1), 37–71.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gershkoff-Stowe, L. & Smith, L. B. (2004). Shape and the first hundred nouns. Childzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Development, 75(4), 1098-1114.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goldfield, B. A., & Reznick, J. S. (1990). Early lexical acquisition: Rate, content, andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) the vocabulary spurt. Journal of Child Language, 17, 171-183.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goldin-Meadow, S., Seligman, M. E., & Gelman, R. (1976). Language in thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) two-year-old. Cognition, 4, 189-202.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. (1987). The development of categorization in the secondzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) year and its relation to other cognitive and linguistic developments, Childzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Development, 58, 1523-1531.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) language. London: Edward Arnold.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hoek, D., Ingram, D. & Gibson, D. (1986). Some possible causes of children’s earlyzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) word overextensions. Journal of Child Language 13(3), 477–94.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Huang, S. (1998). Chinese as a headless language in compounding morphology. In J.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) L. Packard(Ed.), New approaches to Chinese word formation: Morphology,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) phonology and the lexicon in modern and ancient Chinese (pp. 261_284). Newzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) York: Mouton de Gruyter.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hudson, J., & Nelson, K. (1984). Play with language: Overextensions as analogies.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal of Child Language, 11, 337-346.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Huttenlocher, J. (1974). The origin of language comprehension. In R. L. Solso (ed.),zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Theories in cognitive psychology – The Loyola Symposium. Potomac, MD:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Huttenlocher, J. & Kubicek, L. F. (1983). The source of relatedness effects on namingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) latency. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory & Cognitionzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9(3), 486–96.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Imai, M., Gentner, D., & Uchida, N. (1994). Children’s theories of word meaning: thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) role of shape similarity in early acquisition. Cognitive Development, 9, 45-75.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ingram, D. (1978). Sensorimotor intelligence and language development. In A. Lockzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (Ed.), Action, gesture, and symbol. New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Johnson, C. J., Paivio, A. & Clark, J. M. (1996). Cognitive components of picturezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) naming. Psychological Bulletin 120(1), 113–39.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jones, S. S., Smith, L. B., & Landau, B. (1991). Object properties and knowledge inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) early lexical learning. Child Development, 62, 449 – 516.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Khami, A. G. (1986). The elusive first words: the importance of the naming insight forzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) the development of referential speech. Journal of Child Language, 13, 155-161.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (1988). The importance of shape in earlyzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3, 299-321.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (1998). Object shape, object function, andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) object name. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 1-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lifter, K., & Bloom, L. (1989). Object knowledge and the emergence of language.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Infant Behavior and Development, 12, 395-423.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Martin, N., Weisberg, R. W. & Saffran, E. M. (1989). Variables influencing thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) occurrence of naming errors : implications for models of lexical retrieval.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal of Memory & Language 28(4), 462–85.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McShane, J. (1980). Learning to talk. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mok, L. W. (2009). Word superiority effect as a function of semantic transparency ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chinese bimorphemic compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(7), 1039-1081.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Naigles, L. & Gelman, S. (1995). Overextensions in comprehension and productionzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) revisited : preferential-looking in a study of dog, cat, and cow. Journal of Childzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Language, 22(1), 19–46.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Society for Research in Child Development, 38 (Serial No. 149).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word and sentence: interrelations in development.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Psychological Review, 81(4), 267–85.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nelson, K. (1985). Making sense: The acquisition of shared meaning. New York:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nelson, K., Rescorla, L., Gruendel, J., & Benedict, H. (1978). Early lexicons: Whatzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) do they mean? Child Development, 49, 960-968.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rapp, B. & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken wordzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) production. Psychological Review 107(3), 460–99.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reich, P. A. (1976). The early acquisition of word meaning. Journal of Childzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Language, 3, 117-123.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rescorla, L. A. (1980a). Overextension in early language development. Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Child Language, 7, 321-335.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rescorla, L. A. (1980b). Category development in early language. Journal of Childzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Language, 8, 225-238.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Samuelson, L. K., & Smith, L. B. (1999). Statistical regularities among count/masszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) syntax, solidity, and category structure in early noun vocabularies. Cognition, 73,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1 – 33.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Samuelson, L. K. & Smith, L. B. (2005). They call it like they see it : spontaneouszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) naming and attention to shape. Developmental Science 8(2), 182–98.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, L. B. (1989). A model of perceptual classification in children and adults.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Psychological Review, 96(1), 125-144.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, L. B. (2005). From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: a role forzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) associative learning. Psychological Review, 112(2), 347-382.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, L. B., & Heise, D. (1992). Perceptual similarity and conceptual structure. In B.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burns & et al. (Eds.), Percepts, concepts and categories: The representation andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) processing of information. (pp. 233-272). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Holland.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, L. B., Jones, S. S., & Landau, B. (1992). Count nouns, adjectives, andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) perceptual properties in children’s novel word interpretations. Developmentalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Psychology, 28, 273 – 289.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Soja, N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S. (1991). Ontological categories guide youngzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) children’s inductions of word meanings: Object terms and substance terms.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cognition, 38, 179 – 211.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stemberger, J. P. (1989). Speech errors in early child language production. Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Memory and Language, 28, 164–88.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thomson, J. R., and Chapman, R. (1977). Who is ‘Daddy’ revisited: the status ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) two-year-olds’ over-extended words in use and comprehension. Journal of Childzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Language, 4, 359-375.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tomikawa & Dodd (1980). Early word meaning: Perceptually or functionally based?zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Child Development, 51, 1103-1109.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Toyoda, E. & Scrimgoeour, A. (2009). Common and script-specific awareness inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) relation to word recognition in English and Chinese. Language Awareness, 18(1),zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 61-73.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vitkovitch, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (1993). On naming a giraffe azh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) zebra: Picture naming errors across different object categories. Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 243-259.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (1983). The emergence of the literal-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) metaphorical-anomalous distinction in young children. Child Development, 54,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 154-161.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wally, A. C. (1993). The role of vocabulary growth in children’s spoken wordzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) recognition and segmentation ability. Developmental Review, 13, 286-350.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Winner, E. (1979). New names for old things: The emergence of metaphoric language.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal of Child Language, 6, 469-491.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Winner, E. (1988). The point of words : children’s understanding of metaphor andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) irony. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.zh_TW