| dc.contributor | 政大哲學系 | en |
| dc.creator (作者) | 鄭光明 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Cheng, Kuang-Ming | en |
| dc.date (日期) | 2009-03 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 4-九月-2012 10:42:11 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 4-九月-2012 10:42:11 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 4-九月-2012 10:42:11 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/53526 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 色情刊物會使得婦女遭到「噤聲」的命運，因而侵害了婦女的言論自由嗎？對此，女性主義者麥肯能的回答是肯定的，而許多自由主義者的回答則是否定的，甚至認為這個主張非常荒謬。為此，藍騰特別援引英國語言哲學家奧斯丁的說話做行論，並主張：色情刊物之所以侵害了婦女的言論自由，其原因在於色情刊物使得婦女「不能拿話做事」，而這等於使得婦女的言論不能出現在言論自由市場中。本文將主張：藍騰的主張會課以說話者和聽者太多義務；為此，我們必須主張一種對聽者不要求任何「最低限度接收度」的言論自由觀，以避免上述問題。 Famous anti-pornography feminists, Catharine MacKinnon and Rae Langton believe that pornography harms women in a very spe-cial and serious way: by silencing them or violating their civil right to freedom of speech. Langton believes that an analysis of the con-cept of speech acts shows that pornography silences women’s voices. Therefore, pornography destroys political liberty and should not be allowed. Pornography may thus make potential speech acts un-speakable for women, not by preventing them from producing or distributing sounds and scrawls, but by preventing women from do-ing things with their words. In what follows, I will argue that Lang-ton’s view would impose a burdensome range of duties on individu-als. This suggests that there are some powerful liberal reasons for thinking that the right to free speech should not include any mini-mal receptiveness requirement on the part of audiences. | en |
| dc.format.extent | 604344 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | zh_TW | en |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 歐美研究, 39(1), 169-224 | en |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 色情權利;說話做行論;麥肯能;藍騰;不可說的在言噤聲 | en |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | a right to pornography; speech-act theory; Catharine MacKinnon; Rae Langton; unspeakable illocutionary silencing | en |
| dc.title (題名) | 不可說的在言噤聲：藍騰的反色情論證 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Unspeakable Illocutionary Silencing :Langton’s Free Speech Argument Against Pornography | en |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | en |
