1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 文學院
  4. 期刊論文
  5. Item

學術產出-期刊論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 The Ethical Imagination in Bachelard’s Reading of Nietzsche
作者 黃冠閔
Kuan-Min Huang
貢獻者 政大哲學系
關鍵詞 ethical imagination;Nietzsche
日期 2009-03
上傳時間 11-九月-2012 11:28:56 (UTC+8)
摘要 What is an ethical imagination ? Is there a place of imagination in the ethical action? The answer is not so evident. A Kantian attitude is characteristic. In distinguishing the cognitive or theoretical function from the practical usage of law, Kant denies the exercise of transcendental imagination in the law of freedom. The raison d’être of the imagination in the realm of pure theoretical reason is the mediation between the sensible intuition and the understanding. The problem of how the law of freedom is applied to actions in the world of senses, Kant sees only in the understanding in stead of the imagination which engages the schema of sensibility. In considering solely the form, Kant calls into use the law of nature as “ the type of the moral law (Typus des Sittengesetzes)”, which, as an example in actual experience, renders possible the application of the law of practical reason to the experience . The rigid usage of the type guarantees the “rationalism of judgments” against the empiricism and the mysticism of practical reason in reserving the supersensuous character of the intelligible nature. Apart from this apparent negation of imagination in the practical reason, we have another negative presentation in the aesthetical realm.
關聯 Philosophy, Culture, and Traditions, 4, 19-30
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 政大哲學系en
dc.creator (作者) 黃冠閔zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Kuan-Min Huangen
dc.date (日期) 2009-03-
dc.date.accessioned 11-九月-2012 11:28:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-九月-2012 11:28:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-九月-2012 11:28:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/53561-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) What is an ethical imagination ? Is there a place of imagination in the ethical action? The answer is not so evident. A Kantian attitude is characteristic. In distinguishing the cognitive or theoretical function from the practical usage of law, Kant denies the exercise of transcendental imagination in the law of freedom. The raison d’être of the imagination in the realm of pure theoretical reason is the mediation between the sensible intuition and the understanding. The problem of how the law of freedom is applied to actions in the world of senses, Kant sees only in the understanding in stead of the imagination which engages the schema of sensibility. In considering solely the form, Kant calls into use the law of nature as “ the type of the moral law (Typus des Sittengesetzes)”, which, as an example in actual experience, renders possible the application of the law of practical reason to the experience . The rigid usage of the type guarantees the “rationalism of judgments” against the empiricism and the mysticism of practical reason in reserving the supersensuous character of the intelligible nature. Apart from this apparent negation of imagination in the practical reason, we have another negative presentation in the aesthetical realm.en
dc.format.extent 187118 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language zh_TWen
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) Philosophy, Culture, and Traditions, 4, 19-30en
dc.subject (關鍵詞) ethical imagination;Nietzscheen
dc.title (題名) The Ethical Imagination in Bachelard’s Reading of Nietzscheen
dc.type (資料類型) articleen