1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 社會科學學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 農村社區治理夥伴關係運作之研究-社會資本理論觀點
The operation of partnership in Rural Governance - from social capital theory perspective
作者 簡俊發
Chien, Chun Fa
貢獻者 林森田
Lin, Sen Tyan
簡俊發
Chien, Chun Fa
關鍵詞 夥伴關係
社會資本
農村發展
農村社區
partnership
social capital
rural development
rural community
日期 2011
上傳時間 30-十月-2012 14:26:40 (UTC+8)
摘要 我國的農村社區發展由政策性的部門計畫，轉變為制度性的地域性計畫，所強調的是農村社區的在地治理，然而農村特性不同，夥伴關係運作成為在地治理的重要手段，農村社區夥伴關係及其運作將是農村社區能否永續發展的關鍵。本研究以社會資本理論觀點，進行不同農村社區的夥伴關係運作的分析，以及農村社區夥伴關係之運作與夥伴關係社會資本之結構面、關聯面與認知面間的關聯性。並在同時注重夥伴關係社會資本的過程與階段性結果的考量下，針對成熟型的外獅潭社區、學習型的象山社區及多重社區型的無米樂社區三個個案，以半結構式訪談及統計檢定方法，透過質的分析方法瞭解農村社區夥伴關係的運作過程，並在量的方面，以問卷調查與檢定，瞭解階段性過程社會資本的構成與變動。
本研究發現，農村社區因社區特性形成差異性的夥伴關係運作模式，也會因人的因素與制度的改變，導致個別社區不同程度的運作困難。夥伴關係運作愈好，夥伴關係社會資本平均值愈高，然社會資本權重平均權值高並不意味著夥伴關係運作會較好，因夥伴關係運作與夥伴關係社會資本構成只是一個過程及階段性結果的呈現，因此如只著重在社會資本構成之量的調查，而缺乏質的夥伴關係運作過程分析的對比，分析結果將很有可能產生偏誤。另研究也發現，農村社區不僅需要可發揮地方性知識從而在建立社區共識下，形成夥伴關係的在地治理發展模式，在夥伴關係運作過程中，也必須得助政府公部門與許多專業者的持續性專業協助，完成社區發展工作，印證整合型農村發展應注重超在地(extra local)的新內生性農村發展模式。本研究因此提出政府宜積極培育農村社區發展之專職專業經理人、農村社區治理須有積極的人力培力及適時的人力更新，但變動幅度不宜過大、整合性的農村社區發展需長期的逐步累積，不宜遽變式的制度嵌入、農村社區夥伴關係運作透過機制移植雖可加快推動速度，但仍需給予調適期與因地制宜等農村治理等建議。
The development of rural communities in Taiwan has transferred from sectoral plan approach to place-base approach which emphasizes local governance. The operation of partnership in rural governance is the important method in rural community due to the diversity of rural community types. The partnerships of rural community and its operation will be the key to the continuously development of the rural communities. Based upon the social capital theory, this study investigates the operation of partnership on three different kind rural communities. Semi-structure in-depth interview and statistical test approaches are used to understand the process of rural partnership and the change of social capital in the three rural communities. The investigation focus on the process of rural partnership by in-depth interview approach and the relation on the three dimension of social capital by statistical test so as to understand the change of both quality and quantity of social capital of partnership in the study cases.
This study found that the mode of partnership operation is different and results in various difficulties due to the different characteristics of the community, human factors and institutional change. The average weight value of social capital is higher when the operation of partnership is better. However, the higher weight value of social capital doesn’t totally mean that the rural community has a better partnership operation because the weight can only represent a process or the result of the operation of partnership in a certain period. Therefore, there could be exist bias if the analysis focus only on quantity investigation without a contrast from quality analysis of partnership operation. In addition, this study also found that rural community needs instant assistance from government and specialist in the partnership process as well as they need to elaborate local governance within the community’s common vision. The important point to notice is that the comprehensive rural development should adopt ‘extra local’ specialty of new endogenous model .Furthermore, this paper also provides promising suggestions such as full-time position of professional manager , new rural human resources and a long-term vision for the future rural development in Taiwan.
參考文獻 中文
王志輝、陳荔芬、許鴻婉、宋玉珍、林秀鳳，2008，台灣農村再發展之研究-以社區整體規劃方式營造農村新風貌，台灣農村再發展之研究，台北：行政院經濟建設委員會，167-214。
王思秀，2004，社會資本對於知識創造活動、智慧資本及知識管理績效影響之研究，台北：大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。
王俊豪，2007，德國農村競賽制制度規劃與發展評析計畫，台北：行政院農委會水土保持局計畫報告。
江益璋，2009，德國聯邦推動鄉村發展政策等跨部會整合工作簡介，台北：行政院農業委員會，1-8。
行政院文化建設委員會，2006，台北：台灣健康社區六星計畫推動方案（核定本）。
行政院農業委員會，2004，鄉村新風貌計畫。
行政院農業委員會，2009，農村再生條例。
林佩璇，2006，以社會資本理論探討影響社區產業發展因素之研究—以八翁社區為例，台北：國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
林信廷，2009，Making Community Work：社會資本與社區參與相關性之研究，南投：國立暨南大學社會政策與社會工作學系碩士論文。
林惠玲，陳正倉，2000，應用統計學，台北：雙葉書廊有限公司。
柯勇全、吳輝龍、陳榮俊、向宗弘，2008，由下而上農村營造之新契機-培根計畫之探討，2008年第五屆農村規劃學術研討會，台中:國立中興大學，2-55。
孫本初，2002，治理、政治與國家，台北：智勝文化事業有限公司。
梁介宇，2007，團隊衝突與團隊績效之關聯性研究─社會資本之調節效果，台北：東吳大學商學院企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
賈秉靜，2008，從社會資本觀點探討社群網絡於創新環境中之角色扮演-以新竹科學園區為例，新竹：中華大學建築及都市計畫學系碩士論文。
陳榮德，2004，組織內部社會網絡的形成與影響：社會資本觀點，高雄：國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。
黃源協、劉素珍，2009，社會資本對台灣社區發展之政策意涵，台北：行政暨政策學報，48，155-192。
黃源協、劉素真、莊俐晰、林信延，2010，社區社會資本與社區發展關聯性之研究，台北：公共行政學報，34：29-75。
黃樹仁，2002，心牢:農地農用意識型態與台灣城鄉發展，台北：巨流圖書公司。
廖坤榮，2004，台灣農會的社會資本形成與政策績效，台北:政治科學論叢，22，181-220。
廖淑容，2011，台灣鄉村聚落社會資本的評量，2011農村發展與政策規劃研討會，台北：台灣鄉村展望學會，1-13。
劉健哲，2006，城鄉新風貌-德國之農村與規劃，台北：詹氏書局。
蘇鈺伶，2007，組織中知識分享行為：社會資本與代理理論觀點，高雄：國立高雄第一科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文。
墨林社區發展協會，2008，無米樂社區農村再生計畫，未出版。
蔡必焜、王俊豪、卓正欽，2004，社會資本與永續社區發展，台中：台灣鄉村研究，3，53-75。
蔡宏進，1993，鄉村發展理論與實務，台北：東大發行，3-23。
頭屋鄉象山社區農村再生促進會，2008，象山社區農村再生計畫，未出版。
頭屋鄉獅潭社區發展協會，2008，外獅潭社區農村再生計畫，未出版。
錢學陶，1992，農村規劃手冊研究報告，台北：行政院農業委員會。
鍾懿萍、陳智啟，2009，從永續農村目標評台灣地區集村農舍政策執行現況與建議，台北：土地問題研究季刊，8(2)，16-32。
顏怡璇、陳美心，2008，從農村營造人力培訓探討農村社區自主營造能力之培養，2008年第五屆農村規劃學術研討會，台中：國立中興大學，2-55。
英文
Adler, P. S. and Kwon, S. (2002), Social capital: Prospects for a new concept, Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 17-40.
Bachrach, K. , and Zautra A. (1985), Coping with a community stressor: The threat of hazardous waste facility. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 26(2):127-141.
Bankston, C. L. and Zhou M. (2002), Social Capital as process: The Meanings and problems of a Theoredical Metaphor, Sociological Inguiry, 72(2):285-317.
Bourdieu, P. (1986), The Forms of Capital, in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, ed. Richardson, T. G. , greenwood press, 241-258,
Brien, S. O. and Fathaigh, M. O. (2004), Bringing in Bourdieus Theory of Social Capital: Renewing Learning partsreship, Approaches to Social Inclusion, paper presented at the ESAI Annual Conference, NUI Magnooth April 1-3:1-19.
Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002a), Global public policy, partnership, and the Case of the world Commission on Dams, public Administration Review, 62(3):324-336.
Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002b), Government-Nonprofit partnership: A Defining Framework, Public Administration and Development, 22:19-30.
Burt, R. (1992), Structural holes: The social structure of competition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R.S. (1997), The contingent value of social capital, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42:339-365.
Byerlee, D. and Echerenia R. G. (2002), Agricultural Research Policy in an Era of privatization: Introduction and overview, in Byerlee, D. and Echeuerria. R. G.(eds.), Agricultural policy in an Era of privatization: Experience from the Developiny word; Walling ford, 5-17.
Chaskin R, Goerge R, Skyles A. and Guiltinan S. (2006), Measuring social capital: An exploration in community–research partnership, Journal of Community Psychology, v34, 4: 489-514.
Cicourel, A. V. (1973), Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction, London: Penguin.
Coleman, J. (1988), Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital, American Journal of Sociology, 94:95-120.
Coleman, J. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Countryside Agency (2003), The Role of Women in the Rural Economy: An Important Rural Resource, Wetherby.
Davidson, B.W. and Cotter R. P. (1986), Measurement of Sense of Community within the Sphere of City, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 116(7):608–619.
Dhillon, Jaswinder K. (2009), The role of social capital in sustaining partnership, British Educational Research Journal, 33(5):687-704.
Dolfsma, W., Dannreuther, C. (2003), Subjects and boundaries: Contesting social capital-based policies, Journal of Economic Issues, 37(2): 405-413.
Dyer, J. H., and Singh, H. (1998), The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage, The Academy of Management, 23:66-79.
Edwards, B., Goodwin, M., Pemberton S. and Woods M. (2000), Partnership working in Rural regeneration: Governance and empowerment? The policy press and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Elgar. F.J., Davis C.G,, Wohl. M.J., Trites, S.J., Zelenski J.M and Martin. M.S.(2011), Social capital, Health and life satisfaction in 50 Countries, Health and Place, 17:1044-1053.
Fukuyama (1995), Trust:The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free.
Granovetter, M. (1992), Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology, in Nohria, N., and Eccles, R. G.,. (Eds.), Networks and Organization: Structure, Form and Action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Giessen, L. and Böcher, M. (2009), Rural Governance, Forestry, and the promotion of Local Knowledge: The Case of The German Rural Development program Active Regions, Small-Scale Forestry, 8:211-230.
Goodwin, M. (2003), Rural Governance: A Review of Relevant Literature, paper prepared for DEFRA, 1:1-34.
Grootaert C. (1998), Social Capital: The Missing Link? Social Capital Initiative working , 3.
Grootaert C. (2001), Social Capital: The Missing Link. In Social Capital and Participation in everyday life, Edited by Paul, D and Uslaner, P.
Grootaert C. and Bastelaes. T. V. (2002), Understanding and Measuring Social Captial : A mutidisplinary Tool for practitioners; The world Bank.
Grootaert C. Narayan, D., Jone, V. N. and Woolcock, M. (2004), Measuring Social Capital: An Integrated Quertionaire, World Bank Eorking paper, 18.
Halseth, G. and Laura M. R. (2007), The development of partnerships by the voluntary sector to address service needs in rural and small town Canada, 18: 241-265.
Hitt, M. A, Lee, H. and Yucel, E. (2002), The importance of social capital to the management of multinational enterprises: Relational networks among Asian and Western firms, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19:353-372.
Janis, I. L. (1972), Victims of Groupthink: A psychological study of policy decisions and fiascoes, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 277.
Julian, R. et al.(1997), Citizen Participation─Lessons from a Local United Way Planning Process, Journal of The American Planning Association, 63(3): 345-355.
Kapucu. N. (2006), Public-Nonprofit Partnership For Social Capital, Knowledge Management, Organization Intelligence and Learning, And Complexity, vol Ⅲ.
Krishna A. (2007), How Does Social Capital Grow? A Seven- year Study of Villages in India, The Journal of politics, 69(4):941-956.
Lowndes V. and Skelcher C. (1998), The Dynamicd of Muti-organizational partnerships: An Analyis of Changiny Modes of Governance, public Afministation, 76:313-333.
Mackintonsh, M. (1992), partnership: Issue of policy and negotiation, Local Economy, vol.7.No.3:210-224.
McAllister, D. J. (1995), Affect and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1): 24-59.
Midgley, J. (2006), Gendered economies: Transferring private gender roles into the public -realm though rural Community development, Jounal of Rural Studies, 22:217-231.
Mohr, J. and Spekman, R. (1994), Characteristics of partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques, strategic Management Journal, 15:135-152.
Moran, P. (2005), Structural vs relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance, Strategic Management Journal, 26 (12): 1129-1151.
Murdoch, J. and Abram,S. (1998), Defining the limits of community governance. Journal of Rural Studies , 14(1):41-50.
Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998), Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23 (2): 242-266.
Nardone, G. Sisto, R. and Lopolito A. (2009), Social capital in the LEADER Initiative: a methodo logical Approach, Journal of Rural Studies, 1-10.
Newman, L. and Dale, A. (2005), The Role of Agency in Sustainable Local Community Development, Local Environment, 10(5): 477-486.
North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Onyx, J. and Bullen, P. (2001), The different faces of social capital in NSW Australia. In Dekker, P. and Uslaner, E. M. (Eds.), Social Capital and Participation in Everyday Life. New York: Routledge, 45-58.
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press.
O’Toole, K. and Burdess, N. (2004), New Community governance in Small rural townsL : the Australian experience, Journal of Rural Studies, 20:433-443.
Pini, B. (2006), A Critigue of “new” rural local governance : The Case of gender in a rural Australian Setting, Jounal of Rural Studies, 22:396-408.
Portes, A. (1998), Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology, Annual Reviews of Sociology 24:1-24.
Putnam, R. D. , Leonadi, R. and Nanetti, R. Y.(1993), Social Capital and Institutional Success, in Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, princation University press.
Putnam, R. D. (1995), Bowling alone: America`s declining social capital, Journal of Democracy, 6: 65-78.
Putnam, R. D. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Comrnunity, Simon & Schuster.
Radu L. N. and Constantin D. L. (2007), Territorital Development and Networking in the European Urion and Romania: The partnership significance, Journal of Applied Quantitative Method, vol.2.No.3:350-361.
Ray, C. (2006), Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU., In Cloke P., Marsden T. Mooney P.(eds), Handbook of rural studies, Sage,279-291.
Robison L., Schmid A., and Siles M., (2002), Is Social Capital Really Capital, Review of Social Economy, 60(1):1‐21.
Scott M. (2004), Building institutional Capacity in rural Northern Ireland: the role of partnership governance in the LEADER Ⅱ programme, Journal of Rural Studied, 20:49-59.
Stark, N. (2007), Effective Rural Governance: What is it? Does it Matter? Rural Governance Initiative.
Schultz, T. W. (1961), Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51:1-7.
Stoker, G. (1998), Governance as theory: Five proposition, Internctional Social Science Journal, 155(5):17-28.
Swain, N. (2003), Social capital and its Uses, Arch. Europ. Social, XLIV,2:185-212.
Szreter, S. and Woolcock, M.(2004), Health by association? Social Capital, Social theory, and the political ecorony of public health, International Journal of Epidemiology, 33:650-667.
Turunen, H. Saaranen, T. and Tossavainen, K. (2010), Partnership and Social Capital as the Resources for pupils’ Health and Well-Being in School Communities-A follow-up study in Finland, The open Education Journal, 3:54-62.
Uphoff, N. (1999), Understanding social capital: Learning from the analysis and experience of participation, in Serageldin, I. (ed.) Social Capital: A multifaceted perspective, Washington, DC: World Bank, 215-253.
Valentinov, V. (2008), Explaining the Rise of Rural Governance in Europe, Eunpean plawing Studies, 14(1):1-50.
Wallis, A. (1998), Social capital and Community building; part Two, National Civic Review, 87(4):317-336.
Williamson, O. (1991), Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete, New York: Oxford University Press, 105.
Williamson, O. (2005), The Economics of Govenance, The American Economic Review, 95(20):1-18.
Woolcock M.(2001), The place of social capital in understanding, Social and Economic outcomes, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/5/13/1824913.pdf.
描述 博士
國立政治大學
地政研究所
92257502
100
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0922575021
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 林森田zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Lin, Sen Tyanen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 簡俊發zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Chien, Chun Faen_US
dc.creator (作者) 簡俊發zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chien, Chun Faen_US
dc.date (日期) 2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned 30-十月-2012 14:26:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 30-十月-2012 14:26:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 30-十月-2012 14:26:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0922575021en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54952-
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 地政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92257502zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 100zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 我國的農村社區發展由政策性的部門計畫，轉變為制度性的地域性計畫，所強調的是農村社區的在地治理，然而農村特性不同，夥伴關係運作成為在地治理的重要手段，農村社區夥伴關係及其運作將是農村社區能否永續發展的關鍵。本研究以社會資本理論觀點，進行不同農村社區的夥伴關係運作的分析，以及農村社區夥伴關係之運作與夥伴關係社會資本之結構面、關聯面與認知面間的關聯性。並在同時注重夥伴關係社會資本的過程與階段性結果的考量下，針對成熟型的外獅潭社區、學習型的象山社區及多重社區型的無米樂社區三個個案，以半結構式訪談及統計檢定方法，透過質的分析方法瞭解農村社區夥伴關係的運作過程，並在量的方面，以問卷調查與檢定，瞭解階段性過程社會資本的構成與變動。
本研究發現，農村社區因社區特性形成差異性的夥伴關係運作模式，也會因人的因素與制度的改變，導致個別社區不同程度的運作困難。夥伴關係運作愈好，夥伴關係社會資本平均值愈高，然社會資本權重平均權值高並不意味著夥伴關係運作會較好，因夥伴關係運作與夥伴關係社會資本構成只是一個過程及階段性結果的呈現，因此如只著重在社會資本構成之量的調查，而缺乏質的夥伴關係運作過程分析的對比，分析結果將很有可能產生偏誤。另研究也發現，農村社區不僅需要可發揮地方性知識從而在建立社區共識下，形成夥伴關係的在地治理發展模式，在夥伴關係運作過程中，也必須得助政府公部門與許多專業者的持續性專業協助，完成社區發展工作，印證整合型農村發展應注重超在地(extra local)的新內生性農村發展模式。本研究因此提出政府宜積極培育農村社區發展之專職專業經理人、農村社區治理須有積極的人力培力及適時的人力更新，但變動幅度不宜過大、整合性的農村社區發展需長期的逐步累積，不宜遽變式的制度嵌入、農村社區夥伴關係運作透過機制移植雖可加快推動速度，但仍需給予調適期與因地制宜等農村治理等建議。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The development of rural communities in Taiwan has transferred from sectoral plan approach to place-base approach which emphasizes local governance. The operation of partnership in rural governance is the important method in rural community due to the diversity of rural community types. The partnerships of rural community and its operation will be the key to the continuously development of the rural communities. Based upon the social capital theory, this study investigates the operation of partnership on three different kind rural communities. Semi-structure in-depth interview and statistical test approaches are used to understand the process of rural partnership and the change of social capital in the three rural communities. The investigation focus on the process of rural partnership by in-depth interview approach and the relation on the three dimension of social capital by statistical test so as to understand the change of both quality and quantity of social capital of partnership in the study cases.
This study found that the mode of partnership operation is different and results in various difficulties due to the different characteristics of the community, human factors and institutional change. The average weight value of social capital is higher when the operation of partnership is better. However, the higher weight value of social capital doesn’t totally mean that the rural community has a better partnership operation because the weight can only represent a process or the result of the operation of partnership in a certain period. Therefore, there could be exist bias if the analysis focus only on quantity investigation without a contrast from quality analysis of partnership operation. In addition, this study also found that rural community needs instant assistance from government and specialist in the partnership process as well as they need to elaborate local governance within the community’s common vision. The important point to notice is that the comprehensive rural development should adopt ‘extra local’ specialty of new endogenous model .Furthermore, this paper also provides promising suggestions such as full-time position of professional manager , new rural human resources and a long-term vision for the future rural development in Taiwan.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究範圍與流程 3
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 社會資本理論的探討 5
第二節 相關文獻探討 11
第三節 小結 16
第三章 研究設計 19
第一節 研究架構與假說 19
第二節 農村社區夥伴關係運作之訪談 22
第三節 夥伴關係社會資本構成的調查 27
第四章 農村社區治理夥伴關係運作之分析 35
第一節 農村社區夥伴關係運作-2008年個案分析 35
第二節 農村社區夥伴關係運作-2009－2011年個案分析 52
第三節 農村社區夥伴關係運作之比較分析 69
第四節 小結 73
第五章 農村社區夥伴關係之社會資本構成與變動分析 75
第一節 夥伴關係屬性與夥伴關係社會資本之檢定分析 75
第二節 三個農村社區夥伴關係社會資本構成之橫斷面分析 78
第三節 三個農村社區夥伴關係社會資本變動之縱斷面分析 82
第四節 小結 93
第六章 假說驗證與综合分析 95
第一節 假說驗證 96
第二節 綜合分析 101
第三節 小結 104
第七章 結論與建議 105
第一節 結論 105
第二節 建議 109
參考文獻 111		zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0922575021en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 夥伴關係zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會資本zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 農村發展zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 農村社區zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) partnershipen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) social capitalen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) rural developmenten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) rural communityen_US
dc.title (題名) 農村社區治理夥伴關係運作之研究-社會資本理論觀點zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The operation of partnership in Rural Governance - from social capital theory perspectiveen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文
王志輝、陳荔芬、許鴻婉、宋玉珍、林秀鳳，2008，台灣農村再發展之研究-以社區整體規劃方式營造農村新風貌，台灣農村再發展之研究，台北：行政院經濟建設委員會，167-214。
王思秀，2004，社會資本對於知識創造活動、智慧資本及知識管理績效影響之研究，台北：大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。
王俊豪，2007，德國農村競賽制制度規劃與發展評析計畫，台北：行政院農委會水土保持局計畫報告。
江益璋，2009，德國聯邦推動鄉村發展政策等跨部會整合工作簡介，台北：行政院農業委員會，1-8。
行政院文化建設委員會，2006，台北：台灣健康社區六星計畫推動方案（核定本）。
行政院農業委員會，2004，鄉村新風貌計畫。
行政院農業委員會，2009，農村再生條例。
林佩璇，2006，以社會資本理論探討影響社區產業發展因素之研究—以八翁社區為例，台北：國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
林信廷，2009，Making Community Work：社會資本與社區參與相關性之研究，南投：國立暨南大學社會政策與社會工作學系碩士論文。
林惠玲，陳正倉，2000，應用統計學，台北：雙葉書廊有限公司。
柯勇全、吳輝龍、陳榮俊、向宗弘，2008，由下而上農村營造之新契機-培根計畫之探討，2008年第五屆農村規劃學術研討會，台中:國立中興大學，2-55。
孫本初，2002，治理、政治與國家，台北：智勝文化事業有限公司。
梁介宇，2007，團隊衝突與團隊績效之關聯性研究─社會資本之調節效果，台北：東吳大學商學院企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
賈秉靜，2008，從社會資本觀點探討社群網絡於創新環境中之角色扮演-以新竹科學園區為例，新竹：中華大學建築及都市計畫學系碩士論文。
陳榮德，2004，組織內部社會網絡的形成與影響：社會資本觀點，高雄：國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。
黃源協、劉素珍，2009，社會資本對台灣社區發展之政策意涵，台北：行政暨政策學報，48，155-192。
黃源協、劉素真、莊俐晰、林信延，2010，社區社會資本與社區發展關聯性之研究，台北：公共行政學報，34：29-75。
黃樹仁，2002，心牢:農地農用意識型態與台灣城鄉發展，台北：巨流圖書公司。
廖坤榮，2004，台灣農會的社會資本形成與政策績效，台北:政治科學論叢，22，181-220。
廖淑容，2011，台灣鄉村聚落社會資本的評量，2011農村發展與政策規劃研討會，台北：台灣鄉村展望學會，1-13。
劉健哲，2006，城鄉新風貌-德國之農村與規劃，台北：詹氏書局。
蘇鈺伶，2007，組織中知識分享行為：社會資本與代理理論觀點，高雄：國立高雄第一科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文。
墨林社區發展協會，2008，無米樂社區農村再生計畫，未出版。
蔡必焜、王俊豪、卓正欽，2004，社會資本與永續社區發展，台中：台灣鄉村研究，3，53-75。
蔡宏進，1993，鄉村發展理論與實務，台北：東大發行，3-23。
頭屋鄉象山社區農村再生促進會，2008，象山社區農村再生計畫，未出版。
頭屋鄉獅潭社區發展協會，2008，外獅潭社區農村再生計畫，未出版。
錢學陶，1992，農村規劃手冊研究報告，台北：行政院農業委員會。
鍾懿萍、陳智啟，2009，從永續農村目標評台灣地區集村農舍政策執行現況與建議，台北：土地問題研究季刊，8(2)，16-32。
顏怡璇、陳美心，2008，從農村營造人力培訓探討農村社區自主營造能力之培養，2008年第五屆農村規劃學術研討會，台中：國立中興大學，2-55。
英文
Adler, P. S. and Kwon, S. (2002), Social capital: Prospects for a new concept, Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 17-40.
Bachrach, K. , and Zautra A. (1985), Coping with a community stressor: The threat of hazardous waste facility. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 26(2):127-141.
Bankston, C. L. and Zhou M. (2002), Social Capital as process: The Meanings and problems of a Theoredical Metaphor, Sociological Inguiry, 72(2):285-317.
Bourdieu, P. (1986), The Forms of Capital, in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, ed. Richardson, T. G. , greenwood press, 241-258,
Brien, S. O. and Fathaigh, M. O. (2004), Bringing in Bourdieus Theory of Social Capital: Renewing Learning partsreship, Approaches to Social Inclusion, paper presented at the ESAI Annual Conference, NUI Magnooth April 1-3:1-19.
Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002a), Global public policy, partnership, and the Case of the world Commission on Dams, public Administration Review, 62(3):324-336.
Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002b), Government-Nonprofit partnership: A Defining Framework, Public Administration and Development, 22:19-30.
Burt, R. (1992), Structural holes: The social structure of competition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R.S. (1997), The contingent value of social capital, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42:339-365.
Byerlee, D. and Echerenia R. G. (2002), Agricultural Research Policy in an Era of privatization: Introduction and overview, in Byerlee, D. and Echeuerria. R. G.(eds.), Agricultural policy in an Era of privatization: Experience from the Developiny word; Walling ford, 5-17.
Chaskin R, Goerge R, Skyles A. and Guiltinan S. (2006), Measuring social capital: An exploration in community–research partnership, Journal of Community Psychology, v34, 4: 489-514.
Cicourel, A. V. (1973), Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction, London: Penguin.
Coleman, J. (1988), Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital, American Journal of Sociology, 94:95-120.
Coleman, J. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Countryside Agency (2003), The Role of Women in the Rural Economy: An Important Rural Resource, Wetherby.
Davidson, B.W. and Cotter R. P. (1986), Measurement of Sense of Community within the Sphere of City, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 116(7):608–619.
Dhillon, Jaswinder K. (2009), The role of social capital in sustaining partnership, British Educational Research Journal, 33(5):687-704.
Dolfsma, W., Dannreuther, C. (2003), Subjects and boundaries: Contesting social capital-based policies, Journal of Economic Issues, 37(2): 405-413.
Dyer, J. H., and Singh, H. (1998), The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage, The Academy of Management, 23:66-79.
Edwards, B., Goodwin, M., Pemberton S. and Woods M. (2000), Partnership working in Rural regeneration: Governance and empowerment? The policy press and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Elgar. F.J., Davis C.G,, Wohl. M.J., Trites, S.J., Zelenski J.M and Martin. M.S.(2011), Social capital, Health and life satisfaction in 50 Countries, Health and Place, 17:1044-1053.
Fukuyama (1995), Trust:The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free.
Granovetter, M. (1992), Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology, in Nohria, N., and Eccles, R. G.,. (Eds.), Networks and Organization: Structure, Form and Action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Giessen, L. and Böcher, M. (2009), Rural Governance, Forestry, and the promotion of Local Knowledge: The Case of The German Rural Development program Active Regions, Small-Scale Forestry, 8:211-230.
Goodwin, M. (2003), Rural Governance: A Review of Relevant Literature, paper prepared for DEFRA, 1:1-34.
Grootaert C. (1998), Social Capital: The Missing Link? Social Capital Initiative working , 3.
Grootaert C. (2001), Social Capital: The Missing Link. In Social Capital and Participation in everyday life, Edited by Paul, D and Uslaner, P.
Grootaert C. and Bastelaes. T. V. (2002), Understanding and Measuring Social Captial : A mutidisplinary Tool for practitioners; The world Bank.
Grootaert C. Narayan, D., Jone, V. N. and Woolcock, M. (2004), Measuring Social Capital: An Integrated Quertionaire, World Bank Eorking paper, 18.
Halseth, G. and Laura M. R. (2007), The development of partnerships by the voluntary sector to address service needs in rural and small town Canada, 18: 241-265.
Hitt, M. A, Lee, H. and Yucel, E. (2002), The importance of social capital to the management of multinational enterprises: Relational networks among Asian and Western firms, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19:353-372.
Janis, I. L. (1972), Victims of Groupthink: A psychological study of policy decisions and fiascoes, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 277.
Julian, R. et al.(1997), Citizen Participation─Lessons from a Local United Way Planning Process, Journal of The American Planning Association, 63(3): 345-355.
Kapucu. N. (2006), Public-Nonprofit Partnership For Social Capital, Knowledge Management, Organization Intelligence and Learning, And Complexity, vol Ⅲ.
Krishna A. (2007), How Does Social Capital Grow? A Seven- year Study of Villages in India, The Journal of politics, 69(4):941-956.
Lowndes V. and Skelcher C. (1998), The Dynamicd of Muti-organizational partnerships: An Analyis of Changiny Modes of Governance, public Afministation, 76:313-333.
Mackintonsh, M. (1992), partnership: Issue of policy and negotiation, Local Economy, vol.7.No.3:210-224.
McAllister, D. J. (1995), Affect and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1): 24-59.
Midgley, J. (2006), Gendered economies: Transferring private gender roles into the public -realm though rural Community development, Jounal of Rural Studies, 22:217-231.
Mohr, J. and Spekman, R. (1994), Characteristics of partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques, strategic Management Journal, 15:135-152.
Moran, P. (2005), Structural vs relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance, Strategic Management Journal, 26 (12): 1129-1151.
Murdoch, J. and Abram,S. (1998), Defining the limits of community governance. Journal of Rural Studies , 14(1):41-50.
Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998), Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23 (2): 242-266.
Nardone, G. Sisto, R. and Lopolito A. (2009), Social capital in the LEADER Initiative: a methodo logical Approach, Journal of Rural Studies, 1-10.
Newman, L. and Dale, A. (2005), The Role of Agency in Sustainable Local Community Development, Local Environment, 10(5): 477-486.
North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Onyx, J. and Bullen, P. (2001), The different faces of social capital in NSW Australia. In Dekker, P. and Uslaner, E. M. (Eds.), Social Capital and Participation in Everyday Life. New York: Routledge, 45-58.
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press.
O’Toole, K. and Burdess, N. (2004), New Community governance in Small rural townsL : the Australian experience, Journal of Rural Studies, 20:433-443.
Pini, B. (2006), A Critigue of “new” rural local governance : The Case of gender in a rural Australian Setting, Jounal of Rural Studies, 22:396-408.
Portes, A. (1998), Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology, Annual Reviews of Sociology 24:1-24.
Putnam, R. D. , Leonadi, R. and Nanetti, R. Y.(1993), Social Capital and Institutional Success, in Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, princation University press.
Putnam, R. D. (1995), Bowling alone: America`s declining social capital, Journal of Democracy, 6: 65-78.
Putnam, R. D. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Comrnunity, Simon & Schuster.
Radu L. N. and Constantin D. L. (2007), Territorital Development and Networking in the European Urion and Romania: The partnership significance, Journal of Applied Quantitative Method, vol.2.No.3:350-361.
Ray, C. (2006), Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU., In Cloke P., Marsden T. Mooney P.(eds), Handbook of rural studies, Sage,279-291.
Robison L., Schmid A., and Siles M., (2002), Is Social Capital Really Capital, Review of Social Economy, 60(1):1‐21.
Scott M. (2004), Building institutional Capacity in rural Northern Ireland: the role of partnership governance in the LEADER Ⅱ programme, Journal of Rural Studied, 20:49-59.
Stark, N. (2007), Effective Rural Governance: What is it? Does it Matter? Rural Governance Initiative.
Schultz, T. W. (1961), Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51:1-7.
Stoker, G. (1998), Governance as theory: Five proposition, Internctional Social Science Journal, 155(5):17-28.
Swain, N. (2003), Social capital and its Uses, Arch. Europ. Social, XLIV,2:185-212.
Szreter, S. and Woolcock, M.(2004), Health by association? Social Capital, Social theory, and the political ecorony of public health, International Journal of Epidemiology, 33:650-667.
Turunen, H. Saaranen, T. and Tossavainen, K. (2010), Partnership and Social Capital as the Resources for pupils’ Health and Well-Being in School Communities-A follow-up study in Finland, The open Education Journal, 3:54-62.
Uphoff, N. (1999), Understanding social capital: Learning from the analysis and experience of participation, in Serageldin, I. (ed.) Social Capital: A multifaceted perspective, Washington, DC: World Bank, 215-253.
Valentinov, V. (2008), Explaining the Rise of Rural Governance in Europe, Eunpean plawing Studies, 14(1):1-50.
Wallis, A. (1998), Social capital and Community building; part Two, National Civic Review, 87(4):317-336.
Williamson, O. (1991), Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete, New York: Oxford University Press, 105.
Williamson, O. (2005), The Economics of Govenance, The American Economic Review, 95(20):1-18.
Woolcock M.(2001), The place of social capital in understanding, Social and Economic outcomes, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/5/13/1824913.pdf.		zh_TW