學術產出-國科會研究計畫
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 證明度之研究 其他題名 Beweismass 作者 姜世明 貢獻者 國立政治大學法律學系
行政院國家科學委員會關鍵詞 證明度; 自由心證; 蓋然性; 優越蓋然性; 確信; 舉證責任
Level of proof; probability; superior probability; know for sure; burden of proof日期 2005 上傳時間 26-十一月-2012 09:32:50 (UTC+8) 摘要 The Court』s main activities in Civil Procedure are to determine facts and to apply the laws, in which the former is prerequisite to the latter. Thus, there is no doubt about the importance of fact-determining in Civil Procedure. Although the Law of Civil Procedure has already provided some methods and procedure to determine facts, how exactly should the Court decide on the truthfulness of fact, i.e., what level of proof is required to reach a verdict, still remains in dispute. Theories such as 「almost confirmed truthfulness」, 「superior probability and 「high probability beyond common doubt」 are provided to solve this issue. But because these theories are still very abstract, the risk of judges』 arbitrariness still remain. The uncertainty and the difficulty to review any verdict even cause the distrust on the court among the public. To solve this problem, the theory of 「reliable level of proof」 has been brought up. This research project will review articles from Germany, Austria, and the Switzland. It will analyze the function, standard, and exceptions to the requirment of proof. By linking the jurisprudence practice of the Court, we hope to clarify this issue and build up a reasonable standard. 關聯 基礎研究
學術補助
研究期間:9408~ 9507
研究經費:543仟元
行政院國家科學委員會
計畫編號NSC94-2414-H004-062資料類型 report dc.contributor 國立政治大學法律學系 en_US dc.contributor 行政院國家科學委員會 en_US dc.creator (作者) 姜世明 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2005 en_US dc.date.accessioned 26-十一月-2012 09:32:50 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 26-十一月-2012 09:32:50 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 26-十一月-2012 09:32:50 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55789 - dc.description.abstract (摘要) The Court』s main activities in Civil Procedure are to determine facts and to apply the laws, in which the former is prerequisite to the latter. Thus, there is no doubt about the importance of fact-determining in Civil Procedure. Although the Law of Civil Procedure has already provided some methods and procedure to determine facts, how exactly should the Court decide on the truthfulness of fact, i.e., what level of proof is required to reach a verdict, still remains in dispute. Theories such as 「almost confirmed truthfulness」, 「superior probability and 「high probability beyond common doubt」 are provided to solve this issue. But because these theories are still very abstract, the risk of judges』 arbitrariness still remain. The uncertainty and the difficulty to review any verdict even cause the distrust on the court among the public. To solve this problem, the theory of 「reliable level of proof」 has been brought up. This research project will review articles from Germany, Austria, and the Switzland. It will analyze the function, standard, and exceptions to the requirment of proof. By linking the jurisprudence practice of the Court, we hope to clarify this issue and build up a reasonable standard. en_US dc.language.iso en_US - dc.relation (關聯) 基礎研究 en_US dc.relation (關聯) 學術補助 en_US dc.relation (關聯) 研究期間:9408~ 9507 en_US dc.relation (關聯) 研究經費:543仟元 en_US dc.relation (關聯) 行政院國家科學委員會 - dc.relation (關聯) 計畫編號NSC94-2414-H004-062 - dc.subject (關鍵詞) 證明度; 自由心證; 蓋然性; 優越蓋然性; 確信; 舉證責任 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Level of proof; probability; superior probability; know for sure; burden of proof en_US dc.title (題名) 證明度之研究 zh_TW dc.title.alternative (其他題名) Beweismass en_US dc.type (資料類型) report en
