1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 法學院
  4. 國科會研究計畫
  5. Item

學術產出-國科會研究計畫

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 阻卻違法事由與可歸責的前行為 —挑唆防衛及自招危難之研究
其他題名 Justification and Illicit Pre-Behavior —Research on Notwehrprovokation and Verschuldeter Notstand
作者 許恒達
貢獻者 國立政治大學法律學系
行政院國家科學委員會
關鍵詞 法律;阻卻違法事由;可歸責;挑唆防衛;自招危難
日期 2012
上傳時間 26-十一月-2012 09:39:11 (UTC+8)
摘要 本計劃將研究可歸責前行為與阻卻違法事由之間的關係，此一問題主要涉及行為人在前階段，出於自己之過咎而引發阻卻違法事由的前提事實時，能否於後階段侵害他人法益行為時點，主張仍可適用阻卻違法事由而排除刑責？倘若不許可，其理由為何？倘若許可，則是否應在法律效果上有一定程度的限制？德國學說上常常提到「權利濫用原則」與「原因不法行為」等論點，其實質定義為何？其能否直接轉用至我國刑法的解釋？這些問題都將於本計劃中討論。此外，由於刑法阻卻違法事由繁多，本計劃只能處理較具代表性的阻卻違法事由（即正當防衛與緊急避難），本計劃預計以兩年的時間，探討二個最主要的阻卻違法事由面對可歸責前行為時的處理方法：挑唆防衛（第一年期）與自招危難（第二年期），並設法對於相關議題的根本概念範圍、理論架構與成罪結構，進行詳實而完整的處理。
This research program aims to explore the relationship between justification and its pre-behavior which causes the related facts of justification. The questions to be handled in the research project are the following: 1. Is the offender still entitled to argue that his misconduct can be justified though he causes the related situation? And what is the reason? 2. The theories of German criminal law find the answers in both principles: “Rechtsmissbrauch” and “actio illicita in causa”. What are the meanings of these concepts? 3. Can we use the German theories on these issues to interpret Taiwan’s criminal law? The research program is divided into two-year stages. In the first year, the author will focus on the issue of “Notwehrprovokation”. The main topic of the second year will be “verschuldeter Notstand”. This program will do research on both important issues in criminal law and try to find some reasonable interpretations to solve the related problems.
關聯 基礎研究
學術補助
研究期間:10108~ 10207
研究經費:375仟元
資料類型 report
dc.contributor 國立政治大學法律學系en_US
dc.contributor 行政院國家科學委員會en_US
dc.creator (作者) 許恒達zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2012en_US
dc.date.accessioned 26-十一月-2012 09:39:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 26-十一月-2012 09:39:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 26-十一月-2012 09:39:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55967-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本計劃將研究可歸責前行為與阻卻違法事由之間的關係，此一問題主要涉及行為人在前階段，出於自己之過咎而引發阻卻違法事由的前提事實時，能否於後階段侵害他人法益行為時點，主張仍可適用阻卻違法事由而排除刑責？倘若不許可，其理由為何？倘若許可，則是否應在法律效果上有一定程度的限制？德國學說上常常提到「權利濫用原則」與「原因不法行為」等論點，其實質定義為何？其能否直接轉用至我國刑法的解釋？這些問題都將於本計劃中討論。此外，由於刑法阻卻違法事由繁多，本計劃只能處理較具代表性的阻卻違法事由（即正當防衛與緊急避難），本計劃預計以兩年的時間，探討二個最主要的阻卻違法事由面對可歸責前行為時的處理方法：挑唆防衛（第一年期）與自招危難（第二年期），並設法對於相關議題的根本概念範圍、理論架構與成罪結構，進行詳實而完整的處理。en_US
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This research program aims to explore the relationship between justification and its pre-behavior which causes the related facts of justification. The questions to be handled in the research project are the following: 1. Is the offender still entitled to argue that his misconduct can be justified though he causes the related situation? And what is the reason? 2. The theories of German criminal law find the answers in both principles: “Rechtsmissbrauch” and “actio illicita in causa”. What are the meanings of these concepts? 3. Can we use the German theories on these issues to interpret Taiwan’s criminal law? The research program is divided into two-year stages. In the first year, the author will focus on the issue of “Notwehrprovokation”. The main topic of the second year will be “verschuldeter Notstand”. This program will do research on both important issues in criminal law and try to find some reasonable interpretations to solve the related problems.en_US
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 基礎研究en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 學術補助en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 研究期間:10108~ 10207en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 研究經費:375仟元en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 法律;阻卻違法事由;可歸責;挑唆防衛;自招危難en_US
dc.title (題名) 阻卻違法事由與可歸責的前行為 —挑唆防衛及自招危難之研究zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) Justification and Illicit Pre-Behavior —Research on Notwehrprovokation and Verschuldeter Notstanden_US
dc.type (資料類型) reporten