| dc.contributor | 行政院國家科學委員會 | en_US |
| dc.contributor | 國立政治大學國際關係研究中心 | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 李瓊莉 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2011 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 30-十一月-2012 15:10:18 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 30-十一月-2012 15:10:18 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 30-十一月-2012 15:10:18 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56275 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | In recent years, the idea of building an Asia-Pacific regional architecture has been often brought up in strategic dialogues. It is clear that a solid architecture can not be built on sand without a close reference to the modus operandi of existing mechanisms. Reflections from experiences thus are essential. In the 20-year history of Asia-Pacific regional institutional building, the so-called ASEAN-way diplomacy has been commonly accepted. Nevertheless, the “wayâ€� was an extension of a model set by ASEAN members, a group of small and median states, and accepted by more powerful states in the region. This phenomenon challenges realist thoughts of international institutional building, especially those highlighting power structural imperatives in rule-making. In this project, I borrow the concept of ash equilibrium from economic philosophy and game theory and aim at exploring the strategic rationales of regional powers for future references in building regional architecture. The existing regional mechanisms are communication platforms for regional powers. Through those venues, powers understand each others’ concerns and strategic choices. When no single power was able or willing to change its strategy unilaterally, then ASEAN-way diplomacy could be considered their mutual best strategy. The major research task of this project is thus to collect sufficient evidence and rationalize why regional powers selected the ASEAN-Way diplomacy as Nash equilibrium strategy. A new equilibrium might be reached if there emerges a coordinated defection. Therefore, the study will also take the new regional dynamics into account and project the basics for building an Asia-Pacific regional architecture. Among others, implications from the ASEAN Charter and Sino-U.S. strategic competition would be the major concerns. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 過去20 年間，亞太區域發展動態進入了新的階段，並邁向多邊主義。綜觀亞太與東亞兩軌兼容的區域發展進程，發現其皆循著一共通運作方式：「東協模式」（The ASEAN-way diplomacy）。這篇文章一開始先總結亞太及東亞區域的多邊主義特質，再進一步探究：「為何所採取的是『東協模式』而非『霸權模式』？」藉經濟學中的「均衡」概念，本文認為東協模式不僅是建立亞太多邊主義的必要條件，亦是在亞太多邊主義初始發展階段，得以滿足區域內各強權戰略利益，以達成「納許均衡」（Nash equilibrium）的充分條件。 In the past two decades, countries in the Asia-Pacific regionexperienced a new phase of dynamics: multilateralism. Twocompatible tracks of regional processes—Asia-Pacific and EastAsian—have shared a common modality, i.e. the ASEAN-waydiplomacy. This paper starts with a summary of a modus operandiof Asia Pacific/East Asian multilateralism. The main theoreticalpuzzle is ’why is it the ASEAN-way diplomacy, not a hegemonicway?’ Borrowing the concept of equilibrium from economicphilosophy, I suggest that the ASEAN-way diplomacy is not only anecessary condition to start regional multilateralism but also asufficient element to create a Nash equilibrium that satisfies strategicrationales of regional powers at the nascent stage of Asia Pacificmultilateralism. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 基礎研究 | en_US |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 學術補助 | en_US |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 研究期間:10008~ 10107 | en_US |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 研究經費:529仟元 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 區域多邊主義;東協外交模式;東協憲章;納許均衡;亞太 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | regional multilateralism;the ASEAN-way diplomacy;ASEAN Charter;Nash equilibrium;Asia-Pacific | - |
| dc.title (題名) | 亞太區域架構運作模式之研究(I) | zh_TW |
| dc.title.alternative (其他題名) | The Asean-Way Diplomacy in Asia-Pacific Regional Architecture | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | report | en |
