學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 歷史教育政治、集體記憶與身份認同：普通高級中學歷史科課綱改革與爭議案例研究(2002-2012)
The Politics of History Education, Collective Memory & Identity: A Case Study of the High-school History Curriculum Reform and Controversy in Taiwan from 2002 to 2012作者 沈拓筆
Tobias Stenzel貢獻者 李福鐘
Li, Fu Chung
沈拓筆
Tobias Stenzel關鍵詞 歷史教育政治
集體記憶
身份認同
科課綱改革
歷史爭議
臺灣
politics of history education
collective memory
identity
curriculum reform
history controversy
Taiwan日期 2012 上傳時間 2-九月-2013 17:41:12 (UTC+8) 摘要 This thesis examines the politics of history education, collective memory and identity in contemporary Taiwan through a qualitative case study of the high-school history curriculum reform and controversy from 2002 to 2012. Through eight elite interviews, the evaluation of an extensive amount of primary sources, and the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the relevant history curricula and other official documents, I find that the most visible part of the controversy is a conflict between advocates of a “China-centered historical perspective” and the representatives of a “Taiwan-centered historical perspective”, who both try to reclaim the territory of national history to have their collective memory represented in it. Furthermore, my analysis of the relevant history curricula indicates that all of them are representative of the collective memory of more than one group. This demonstrates that the influence political parties can exert on history education is constrained by competing versions of collective memory. The thesis also shows how the strong tendency towards Taiwan-centered view on history within society has been translated into the history curriculum after the DPP created conducive conditions for meaningful change. Subsequently, the KMT tried to exert influence on the revision process, but continuous attention from the public prevented major changes. In the final analysis, it is very difficult for any political party or powerful group within contemporary Taiwan to impose one exclusive version of the past as national master narrative on the whole society. Competing collective memories of sub-national groups continue to co-exist within civil society, which demands for a more pluralist history curriculum that incorporates smaller “memory communities” in the national narrative to forestall social disunity and further controversy. 參考文獻 5. Bibliography Ahn, Y. (2008). De-nationalising and Re-nationalising the Past. In S. Richter (Ed.), Contested Views of a Common Past: Revisions of History in Contemporary East Asia (pp. 11–46). Campus Verlag. Anderson, B. R. O. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso. Anderson, P. (2004). Union Sucrée. In: London Review of Books, 26 (18), pp. 10-16. London Review of Books, 26(18), 10–16. Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and Curriculum (3rd ed.). Routledge. Bodnar, J. (1992). Remaking America: Public Memory, Commemoration and Patriotism in the Twentieth Century. Princeton University Press. Cai, B. (2004, April 4). 歷史教育不宜腰斬 [History education inappropriately cut in half]. Apple Daily. Retrieved May 22, 2013, from http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/supplement/20040404/833065/ Cai, W. (2004, December 13). 沒有學生的歷史課 [There is no history education for students]. UnitedDailyNews. Retrieved April 19, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/news/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=5660 Cairo Communique. (1943, December 1). National Diet Library. Retrieved May 30, 2013, from http://www.ndl.go.jp/constitution/e/shiryo/01/002_46shoshi.html Chang, B. (2004). From Taiwanization to de-Sinicization. China perpectives, (56). Retrieved from http://chinaperspectives.revues.org/438 Chang, L. (2008). Re-imagining Community from Different Shores: Nationalism, Post-colonialism and Colonial Modernity in Taiwanese Historiography. In S. Richter (Ed.), Contested Views of a Common Past: Revisions of History in Contemporary East Asia (pp. 139–155). Campus Verlag. Chang, L. (2011). Telling histories of an island nation. In G. Müller (Ed.), Designing History in East Asian Textbooks: Identity Politics and Transnational Aspirations (Vols. 1-1, Vol. 1, pp. 117–134). New York: Routledge. Chang, Y.-P. (2003, October 18). Scholars press to rewrite history. Taipei Times. Retrieved March 7, 2013, from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2003/10/18/2003072377 Chen, J. (2004, December). 誤國誤民的民進黨政府台灣地位未定論 [The DPP discourse of the unresolved status of Taiwan with the wrong country and the wrong people]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/168-7196.html Chen, J.-J. (2002). Reforming textbooks, reshaping school knowledge: Taiwan’s textbook deregulation in the 1990s. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 10(1), 39–72. doi:10.1080/14681360200200129 Chen, Ro-jinn. (2003, October 3). History must be studied in context. Taipei Times. Retrieved March 7, 2013, from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2003/10/03/2003070235 Chen, Ruoshui. (2010). 九九年高中歷史課綱 / 中國與東亞部分評議 [The 2010 high-school history curriculum guidelines / Assessment of the China and East-Asia part]. Contemporary, 244, 65–71. Chen, W. (2005). The History of an Alien-Nation, or the Alienation of History? The Controversy over History Textbook Reform in Taiwan in the 90s. Asia Pacific Forum, 28, 90–103. Chen, X. (2010, September 17). 臺灣史上溯三國 當三思 [Taiwanese history traced back to the Three Kingdoms. Three thoughts]. China Times. Retrieved March 2, 2013, from http://news.chinatimes.com/reading/0,5251,51301374x112010091700430,00.html Chen, Yishen. (2010, February 26). 撥亂反正 正反亂撥 [Bringing order out of chaos - Bringing chaos out of order]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/feb/26/today-o2.htm Chen, Yujun. (2003, November). 清史是外國史係數典忘祖 [To treat Qing history as the history of a foreign country is the same as to recount history but omit one‘s ancestors]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 20, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/155-289.html Chen, Zhongning. (2010, February 28). 大家談: 過往所看不見的台灣政治史 [Unseen past Taiwanese political history]. 98history. Retrieved from http://98history.blogspot.tw/2010/02/blog-post_28.html Chen, Ziyu. (2012, June 12). 中教司長，我也是民眾！[Directed at the head of high-school education, I am also the people!]. Liberty Times. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/12/today-o8.htm China Times. (2010, September 19). 短 評－是該往南看一看 [Short critic: one should look south]. Retrieved April 22, 2013, from http://news.chinatimes.com/forum/0,5252,11051402x112010091900253,00.html CNA. (2012, June 11). 國教院：教科書名詞依法令界定 [MOE: the terms in the textbooks are defined according to decree]. Radio Taiwan International. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://news.rti.org.tw/index_newsContent.aspx?nid=359828 Corcuff, S. (2005). History Textbooks, Identity Politics, and Ethnic Introspection in Taiwan: The June 1997 Knowing Taiwan Textbooks Controversy and the Questions It Raised on the Various Approaches to “Han” Identity. In E. Vickers & A. Jones (Eds.), History Education and National Identity in East Asia (pp. 133–169). New York: Routledge. Declaration. (2010, April 1). 【聯合聲明】抵抗中國史觀的台灣史，蔡英文主席不應沉默 [Joint Declaration: Resist the Chinese Historical Viewpoint of Taiwanese History, Chairperson Tsai Ying-wen should not remain silent]. Retrieved from http://98history.blogspot.tw/2010/04/blog-post.html Du, Z. (2004). 一個新史觀的誕生//新史學之 [The birth of a new historical perspective // The new road of historiography]. Taipei: Sanmin Publishing. Du, Z. (2010, April 29). 成大論壇 前教育部長杜正勝暢談台灣主體教育 | 中央社訊息平台 [Forum at the National Cheng Kung University (NCKU): The former Minister of Education Du Zhengsheng talks freely about the eduction with Taiwan at the center]. CNA. Nachrichten. Retrieved February 27, 2013, from http://www.cna.com.tw/postwrite/Detail/57170.aspx Editorial. (2010, February 26). 馬政府要消滅台灣意識灌輸大中國史觀 [The Ma administration wants to put an end to Taiwanese consciousness by teaching the Greater China historical point of view]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/feb/26/today-s1.htm Foucault, M. (1975). Film in Popular Memory: An Interview with Michael Foucault. Radical Philosophy, 2, 24–29. Freeman, C. W. (1996). Same Strait, Different Memories. In G. W. Gong (Ed.), Remembering and Forgetting: The Legacy of War and Peace in East Asia (pp. 38–59). CSIS. FTV. (2012, June 11). 教材去台灣化?立委爆有黑手 [Teaching material faces de-Taiwanization? Legislator claims there is a criminal]. FTV News. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://news.ftv.com.tw/NewsContent.aspx?ntype=class&sno=2012611P13M1 Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and Method. Continuum International Publishing Group. Gong, G. W. (1996). Remembering and Forgetting: The Legacy of War and Peace in East Asia. CSIS. Greene, J. M. (2008). History, Identity, and Politics: the First Chen Shui-bian Administration’s Efforts to Craft Taiwan’s History. In S. Goldstein & J. Chang (Eds.), Presidential Politics in Taiwan (pp. 115–141). Guo, Y. (2012, June 11). 宰殺文化 高中歷史課本去台灣化遭批 [To butcher culture. The high-school history books become de-Taiwanized]. IDN News. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://www.idn.com.tw/news/news_content.php?catid=4&catsid=2&catdid=0&artid=20120611abcd027 Guo, Z. (2005). 歷史教育與時代聚焦的轉變：以2000年高中歷史教科書下冊為例的討論 [The transformation of history education and the foci of the times: discussion based on history textbooks for senior high school freshmen in 2000]. http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089153012. Retrieved from http://nccuir.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33578 HaixiaInfo. (2004, December). 違憲竄史罪不容.嚴厲警告陳水扁、杜正勝 [The death penalty is not enough to punish unconstitutional change of history. A strict warning to Chen Shuibian and Du Zhengsheng]. HaixiaInfo. Retrieved April 18, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/SRM/168.html Halbwachs, M. (1980). The collective memory. New York: Harper & Row. Halbwachs, M. (1992). On Collective Memory. (L. A. Coser, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. Hao, B. (2012, February 21). 郝柏村：正視中學史地課本 [Hao Bocun: Facing squarely the high-school history and geography books]. Retrieved June 15, 2013, from http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NAT3/6913779.shtml Hong, B. (2010a, September). 高中歷史教學裡的征服者與被征服者角度 [The Perspective of the Conquerors and the Conquered in High-school history education]. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCoQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2F203.68.236.93%2Fdoc%2Farticle%2F990730.doc&ei=l0G5UeKRCsmokgXynoHwAw&usg=AFQjCNH2MPqFx-R2PPOuN-kH55JJEUCT-g&sig2=I7H-zvSKNlTxTF0xGQKnDQ&bvm=bv.47883778,d.dGI Hong, B. (2010b, October 2). 原住民 再征服 [Aboriginal People. Conquered Again.]. 自由電子報 Liberty Times. Retrieved March 3, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/oct/2/today-o10.htm Hong, Z. (2010, September 17). 高中歷史課綱 統獨史觀拉鋸 [The High School History Curriculum Guidelines. The to-and-fro between the Independence and Unification historical perspectives]. China Times. Retrieved March 2, 2013, from http://news.chinatimes.com/reading/0,5251,51301374x112010091700519,00.html Hsiau, A.-C. (2000). Contemporary Taiwanese Cultural Nationalism. Routledge Chapman & Hall. Hsieh, J. F. (2005). Ethnicity, National Identity, and Domestic Politics in Taiwan. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 40(1-2), 13–28. doi:10.1177/0021909605052936 Hsueh H. (2009). 從歷史文獻看台灣國際的定位問題 [Looking at the historical documents that pertain to the question of Taiwan´s international status]. In Discussion Forum of Taiwan´s International Status (pp. 87–100). Retrieved from http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/53314 Hu, Q. (2011, May 11). 加重中國史 歷史課綱定案被轟 [Increase of Chinse history. The final verdict over the history curriculum is under attack]. Retrieved May 8, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2011/new/may/11/today-education1.htm Hu, Q., & Li, X. (2010, March 29). 中國史擬擴編 社團籲全民抵抗 [Chinese history to be expanded, Associations ask everybody to protest]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 23, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/mar/29/today-t2.htm Hu, Y. (2010, March 10). 那曾錯過的臺灣史教育 [This missed out opportunity in Taiwanese history education]. 98history. Retrieved from http://98history.blogspot.tw/2010/03/blog-post_10.html#more Huang, C. (2005). Dimensions of Taiwanese/Chinese Identity and National Identity in Taiwan A Latent Class Analysis. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 40(1-2), 51–70. Huang, J. (2003, October 16). Legislators clash over high school history textbooks. Taipei Times. Retrieved February 7, 2013, from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2003/10/16/2003071831 Huang, J. (2004, April 29). New education minister could spell reform: analysts. Taipei Times. News. Retrieved May 22, 2013, from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2004/04/29/2003138490 Huang, Yijing. (2004, November 15). 捲入歷史風暴 周樑楷挺直腰桿 [Drawn into the history storm - Zhou Liangkuai walks tall]. Liberty Times. Retrieved March 7, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2004/new/nov/15/today-p2.htm Huang, Yimin. (2012, June 12). 哪個「民眾」在去台灣化？[Which “public” is de-Taiwanizing?]. Liberty Times. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/12/today-o7.htm Huang, Z. (2010, February 26). 駁斥王曉波的謬論 [Refute the misconception of Wang Xiaobo]. HI-ON. Retrieved May 15, 2013, from http://www.hi-on.org.tw/bulletins.jsp?b_ID=98092 Huntington, S. P. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century (Vol. 4). Norman and London: University of Oklahoma Press. Jager, S. M., & Mitter, R. (Eds.). (2007). Ruptured Histories: War, Memory, and the Post-Cold War in Asia. Harvard University Press. Jiang, C. (2010a). 作繭自縛的歷史史觀 [A historical perspective that spins a cocoon around itself]. Contemporary, 244, 82–85. Jiang, C. (2010b, March 13). 奴才教科書 [Textbook Slavery]. 自由電子報 Liberty Times. Retrieved February 20, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/mar/13/today-o4.htm Jiang, Z. (2012, June 11). 教科書去台灣化？教育部：回歸課綱與憲法規定 [De-Taiwanization of textbooks? MOE: Return to the Curriculum and the regulations of the constitution]. Yam News. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://n.yam.com/rti/politics/20120611/20120611532938.html Jun, C. (2005, February 2). 歷史教科書大綱爭議與公民社會[The controversy over the main points in the history textbook and civil society]. Retrieved April 20, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/news/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=7725 Lan, W. (2010, February 10). 高中不教台灣史了？[There will be no Taiwanese history taught in High School?]. Formosapost. Retrieved May 15, 2013, from http://www.formosapost.com.tw/blog.php?do=showone&uid=86&type=blog&itemid=2651 Legislative Yuan. (2003, November 3). 立法院公報 92：45 頁352-355 [Legislative Yuan Announcement 92: 45 page 352-355]. Retrieved June 5, 2013, from http://lci.ly.gov.tw/LyLCEW/lcivCommMore.action#pageName_searchResult=5 Li, G. (2004, December). 扭曲的史觀 [Twisting the historical perspective]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/168-5567.html Li, M. (2004, November 11). 高中歷史 中國史台灣史分離 [High School History: History of China and Taiwan separated]. udn.com. Retrieved April 19, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/news/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=4082 Li, Y., Lin, X., & Huang, W. (2012, July 17). 立委批馬指示修改歷史教科書 [Legislator criticizes that Ma instructs the modification of history textbooks]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jul/17/today-p3.htm Li, Z. (2010, September 27). 王曉波：新版高中歷史教科書 沒去中國化問題 [Wang Xiaobo: There will be no problem of de-Sinicization in the new version of the high school history textbooks]. China Review News. Retrieved April 30, 2013, from http://www.chinareviewnews.com/doc/1014/5/8/0/101458059.html?coluid=7&kindid=0&docid=101458059&mdate=0927110151 Lin, C. (2012, June 27). 教科書去台灣化 綠：不符合全民共識 [De-Taiwanization of Textbooks. Green: Not in line with the consensus of the entire population]. Yam News. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://n.yam.com/newtalk/politics/20120627/20120627581889.html Lin, G. (2010a). 對高中歷史課綱的看法. 一個高中老師的觀點 [Opinion about the High-school history curriculum guidelines / From the perspective of a high-school teacher]. Contemporary, 244, 72–78. Lin, M. (2012). 高中歷史教科書。以《中日和約》定位台灣 [High-school history textbooks. Taiwan’s status is decided upon by the Treaty of Taipei]. 主權在我-《中日和約》之時代意義 [The sovereignty is with me - the significance of the era of the Treaty of Taipei], 34–39. Lin, S. (2010, February 25). 高中增中國史時數 綠批教育中國化 [High school Chinese history increases, The green camp criticices the Sinization of Education]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 19, 2013, from http://iservice.libertytimes.com.tw/liveNews/news.php?no=334712&type=%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB Lin, Xiaoyun. (2010a, June 29). 高中歷史課綱修訂草案 強銷統派史觀 [The revised draft of the High School history curriculum guidelines unyieldingly see the historical perspective of the “Unification Faction”]. 自由電子報 Liberty Times. Retrieved February 27, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/jun/29/today-t1.htm Lin, Xiaoyun. (2010b, September 13). 台灣史上溯三國 學者斥強銷統派史觀 [Taiwanese History is traced to the Three Kingdoms Period (220-280), Scholars blame the implementation of the historical perspective of the Unification Faction]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 27, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/sep/13/today-t2.htm Lin, Xiaoyun. (2011, May 10). 自由電子報 - 偷渡中國史課程？本土社團批教部霸凌 [Chinese history illegally introduced in the curriculum? Bentu Society criticizes the MOE]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 8, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2011/new/may/10/today-life5.htm Lin, Xiaoyun. (2012a, June 25). 教團︰教科書非當權者工具 設獨立委會 斷政治黑手 [Education Association: The History Textbooks are not a tool for those in power. There has to be set up an independent committee to break the political Criminals]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/25/today-fo3.htm Lin, Xiaoyun. (2012b, July 10). 高中歷史教科書爭議 鄭麗君赴教育部送意見書 [The High School History Textbook Controversy. Zheng Lijun forwarded an Opinion Letter to the MOE]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://iservice.libertytimes.com.tw/liveNews/news.php?no=664588&type=%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB Lin, Xiaoyun. (2012c, July 11). 五千人連署╱反竄改歷史教材 立委致教長「大眾意見書」[5 thousand people have signed the petition / Oppose the modification of the history teaching material. Legislator forwarded the “Opinion of the Masses Document” to the Minister of Education]. Li. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jul/11/today-p4.htm Lin, Xiaoyun, & Hu, Q. (2010, September 14). 自由電子報 - 爭議性素材入課綱／台灣史上溯添困惑 家長聯盟︰放孩子一馬吧 [Controversial Source Material enters the Curriculum Guidelines / The retracing of Taiwanese history creates bewilderment; Nation Alliance of Parents Organization: Please Spare our Children]. Liberty Times. Retrieved March 1, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/sep/14/today-p2.htm Lin, Xiaoyun, & Hu, Q. (2012, June 11). 教師︰傷害學生受教權 [Teacher: This violates the student´s right for education]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/11/today-p3.htm Lin, Xiaoyun, & Huang, Y. (2012a, June 25). 反竄改歷史教科書 連署破4千 [Petition against the modifiction of the History Textbooks has already been signed 4000 times]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/25/today-fo1.htm Lin, Xiaoyun, & Huang, Y. (2012b, June 25). 立委︰公布名單與專業背景 編審怎麼聘 教部須踹共 [Legislator: Names List Publication and Professional Background. How should the Examination Committee Members be picked. MOE kicks public opinion]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/25/today-fo2.htm?Slots=All Lin, Xiaoyun, Tang, Zeng, W., & Liu, R. (2010, February 27). 學者：台灣史才是國史 [Scholar: Only Taiwanese history is national history]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 19, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/feb/27/today-life9.htm Lin, Xiaoyun, & Zeng, W. (2010, February 25). 網友論戰：中國文化派焦慮 拿教科書治療 [The heated debate of an netizen: The Chinese Culture Clique is anxious and tries to make textbooks their psychological treatment]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/feb/25/today-life2.htm Lin, Xiaoyun, Zeng, W., & Lin, S. (2010, February 26). 高中歷史課綱台灣史起點 王曉波論點再惹爭議 [The High School History Curriculum takes Taiwanese history as the starting point: Wang Xiaobo´s line of reasoning causes a controversy once again]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/feb/26/today-life7.htm Lin, Xinyi, & Peng, Y. (2012, June 11). 高中歷史被控去台灣化 教部否認 [The high-school history has been accused of de-Taiwanization. MOE denies]. 公視新聞網. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://news.pts.org.tw/detail.php?NEENO=212598 Lin, Z. (2010b, September 14). 歷史課新課綱中國史教不完 1→1.5學期 [The Chinese History in the New Curriculum can not be taught to the end in 1semester and is thus extended to 1.5 semsters]. China Times. Retrieved March 1, 2013, from http://news.chinatimes.com/focus/0,5243,50106574x112010091400125,00.html Lin, Z. (2010c, September 14). 台灣史溯三國？可教學生解釋歷史[Traceing Taiwanese History to the Time of the Three Kingdoms? This can teach students to interpret history]. China Times. Retrieved March 1, 2013, from http://news.chinatimes.com/focus/0,5243,50106574x112010091400126,00.html Lin, Z. (2012, July 11). 高中歷史課本爭議 教長：專業審定 [High School History Textbook Controversy. Minister of Education: Professional Examination and Approval]. China Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://life.chinatimes.com/2009Cti/Channel/Life/life-article/0,5047,11051801+112012071100051,00.html Liu, J., Chen, J., & Zhang, G. (2012, June 20). 「我是民眾，我反對竄改歷史」連署中 [I am the people, I oppose the modification of history.petition]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/20/today-o3.htm Liu, M.-H., Hung, L.-C., & Vickers, E. (2005). Identity Issues in Taiwan´s History Curriculum. In E. Vickers & A. Jones (Eds.), History Education and National Identity in East Asia (pp. 101–131). New York: Routledge. Liu, Xiaoxia. (2004, November 11). 歷史應多元 避免扯入政爭[History has to be pluralistic to avoid to become a the subject of political partisan fighting]. Retrieved April 19, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/news/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=4063 Liu, Xiaoxia. (2010, February 27). 中選會公佈立委補選投票率僅4成上下 [The Central Election Commission announces that the turnout of the Legislative Yuan by-election was only around 40%]. CTS. Retrieved June 16, 2013, from http://news.cts.com.tw/cnyes/money/201002/201002270418104.html Liu, Xinyuan. (2003, October 15). 高中歷史新課程綱要的來龍去脈 [The sequence of events of the new high school history curriculum guidelines]. National Policy Foundation. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/EC/092/EC-B-092-055.htm Liu, Xinyuan. (2004, December 15). 高中歷史新課程綱要的爭議 [The controversy over the new high school history curriculum guidelines]. National Policy Foundation. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/EC/093/EC-B-093-047.htm Ller-Saini, G. M. (2011). Designing History in East Asian Textbooks. Taylor & Francis. Makeham, J. (2005). Introduction. In J. Makeham & A. -chi. Hsiau (Eds.), Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan: Bentuhua (First Edition., pp. 3–14). Palgrave Macmillan. Makeham, J., & Hsiau, A. -chi. (Eds.). (2005). Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan: Bentuhua (First Edition.). Palgrave Macmillan. Mao, C.-J. (2008). Fashioning curriculum reform as identity politics—Taiwan’s dilemma of curriculum reform in new millennium. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(5), 585–595. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.10.005 Middleton, D., & Brown, D. S. D. (2005). The Social Psychology of Experience: Studies in Remembering and Forgetting. SAGE. MOE. (1971). 高級中學課程標準 [Senior High-school Curriculum Standard]. Taipei: 正中書局印行 [Zhengzhong Publishing]. MOE. (1983). 高級中學課程標準 [Senior High-school Curriculum Standard]. Taipei: 正中書局印行 [Zhengzhong Publishing]. MOE. (1996). 高級中學課程標準 [Senior High-school Curriculum Standard]. Taipei: Ministry of Education. MOE. (2004). 中華民國教育年報(92) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2003)]. Taipei. MOE. (2005a). 中華民國教育年報(93) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2004)]. Taipei. MOE. (2005b). 普通高級中學課程暫行綱要 [Normal Senior High-school Curriculum Temporary Guidelines]. Taipei: Ministry of Education. MOE. (2006). 中華民國教育年報(94) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2005)]. Taipei. MOE. (2007). 中華民國教育年報(95) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2006)]. Taipei. MOE. (2008a). 中華民國教育年報(96) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2007)]. Taipei. MOE. (2008b). 普通高級中學課程綱要 [Senior High-school Curriculum Guidelines]. Ministry of Education. MOE. (2008c, January 24). 高中課程綱要總綱與23科綱要 [The General Guiding Principles of the High School History Curriculum Outline and]. MOE. (2008d, February 5). 教育部新聞稿-發布普通高級中學課程綱要 [MOE press release. Announcement of the High-school Curriculum Guidelines]. MOE. (2009). 中華民國教育年報(97) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2008)]. Taipei. MOE. (2010a). 中華民國教育年報(98) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2009)]. Taipei. MOE. (2010b, August 19). 公告：「普通高級中學歷史科課程綱要(草案)公聽會」於9月16~19日分區辦理 [Announcement: The public hearings for the Normal Senior High School History Curriculum Guidelines (Draft)” will be held September the 16-19th in the allocated areas]. Center for History Education. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://203.68.236.93/xoops2/modules/news/article.php?storyid=247 MOE. (2010c, September 13). 普通高級中學必修科目「歷史」課程綱要(草案) [101 Draft]. MOE. Retrieved from http://203.68.236.93/doc/news/990913.pdf MOE. (2011a). 中華民國教育年報(99) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2010)]. Taipei. MOE. (2011b, June 7). 正式公告課程綱要 [Official Curriculum Guidelines]. Retrieved from http://203.68.236.93/doc/95course/content/1000607-02.doc MOE. (2012). 中華民國教育年報(100) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2011)]. Taipei. Moore, R. (2007). Sociology of Knowledge and Education (1st ed.). Continuum. Nora, P. (1989). Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations, (26), 7–24. doi:10.2307/2928520 Peng, Q. (2010, September 13). 史課綱爭議，教長：請尊重專業 [The High School History Curriculum Controversy, Minister of Education: Please respect professionalism]. China Times. Retrieved April 22, 2013, from http://news.chinatimes.com/politics/0,5244,11050202x132010091300663,00.html Petition. (2012, June 20). 我是民眾，我反對竄改歷史 [I am the people, I oppose the modification of history]. Campaign. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://campaign.tw-npo.org/sign.php?id=2012061809565300 Poole, R. (1999). Nation and Identity. Routledge Chapman & Hall. Popular Memory Group. (1998). Popular Memory: Theory, Politics, Method. In P. Robert & A. Thomson (Eds.), Oral History Reader (pp. 43–53). New York: Routledge. Potsdam Declaration. (1945, July 26). National Diet Library. Retrieved May 30, 2013, from http://www.ndl.go.jp/constitution/e/etc/c06.html Qiu, Y., & Lin, X. (2010, June 30). 教科書強銷統派史觀 綠委批洗腦 [The History Textbooks strongly advocate the historical perspective of the unification faction. Green Legislator accuses brain-whashing]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 15, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/jun/30/today-life11.htm Ran, R., & Zhuang, Z. (2010, March 28). 98課綱擬加重中國史 本土社團抗議-公視新聞網 [The 98 curriculum plan to increase the amount of Chinese history - Bentu Association protests]. 公視新聞網 [PTS News Network]. Retrieved February 23, 2013, from http://news.pts.org.tw/detail.php?NEENO=144273 Schneider, C. (2008). National Fortresses Besieged: History Textbooks in Contemporary Mainland China, Taiwan, and Japan. In S. Richter (Ed.), Contested Views of a Common Past: Revisions of History in Contemporary East Asia (pp. 245–270). Campus Verlag. Schudson, M. (1989). The Past in the Present versus the Present in the Past. Communication, 2, 105–113. Schwartz, B., & Kim, M. (Eds.). (2010). Northeast Asia’s Difficult Past: Essays in Collective Memory. Palgrave Macmillan. Shen, S.-C., & Wu, N. (2008). Ethnic and Civic Nationalism: Two Roads to the Formation of a Taiwanese Nation. In P. C. Y. Chow (Ed.), The “One China” Dilemma (pp. 117–143). New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Shi, Q. (2010, March 20). 台灣為主體的教育 [Education with Taiwan as the Main Part]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 20, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/mar/20/today-o10.htm Shi, W. (2010, March 11). 保守與倒退的九九 [Conservative and Backward-Looking 99]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 20, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/mar/11/today-o4.htm Shi, Y. (2004, December). 淺談中美建交公報 [Discussion of the Communique between China and the US for the establishment of diplomatic relations]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/168-5568.html Song, X. (2004). Between Civic and Ethnic: The Transformation of Taiwanese Nationalist Ideologies (1895-2000). Asp / Vubpress / Upa. Southern Taiwan Society. (2003, September 12). Focus the education system on Taiwan. Taipei Times. Retrieved March 7, 2013, from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2003/09/12/2003067553 Su, Y. (2012a, June 11). 馬求的歷史定位 現形 [The Status of history of Ma´s conviction becomes obvious]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/11/today-p4.htm Su, Y. (2012b, June 12). 教部成政治文宣打手 [The MOE becomes a hired thug for political propaganda]. Liberty Times. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/12/today-p5.htm Su, Y., & Hu, Q. (2012, June 12). 政治黑手 推ECFA、免簽入教科書 [Political Criminals push ECFA and the visa-exemption in the history textbooks]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/12/today-p4.htm Su, Y., & Lin, X. (2012a, June 11). 立委踢爆 馬政府要將高中歷史「去台灣化」[Legislator Exposes: The Ma Administration want to de-Taiwanize the High School Curriculum]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 8, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/11/today-t1.htm?Slots=Live Su, Y., & Lin, X. (2012b, June 11). 「民眾建議意見」下指導棋 審委不滿 [“Suggestions and Opinions from the Public” is giving directions. The Examination Committee is not pleased]. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/11/today-p2.htm Sun, S. (2010a, March). 真正的復辟派御用學者正在現形 [The true face of the real stick-in-the-mud´s that use scholars unveals itself]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/231-7823.html Sun, S. (2010b, August). 只有「台灣人民史觀」，而無「統獨史觀」[There is just a „Historical Perspective of the Taiwanese people“, and no „Unification or Independence Historical Perspective”]. HaixiaInfo. Retrieved May 15, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/236-7936.html Teacher. (2010, September 17). 一位高中歷史老師對新課綱草案的看法 [The opinion of a High School Teacher about the New Curriculum]. Retrieved from http://de.scribd.com/doc/37631193/%E4%B8%80%E4%BD%8D%E7%8F%BE%E5%A0%B4%E6%95%99%E5%AD%B8%E7%9A%84%E9%AB%98%E4%B8%AD%E8%80%81%E5%B8%AB%E7%9A%84%E4%BE%86%E4%BF%A1 Treaty of San Francisco. (1951, September 8). Taiwan Documents Project. Retrieved May 30, 2013, from http://www.taiwandocuments.org/sanfrancisco01.htm Vickers, E. (2007). Frontiers of Memory: Conflict, Imperialism, and Official Histories in the Formation of Post-Cold War Taiwan Identity. In S. M. Jager & R. Mitter (Eds.), Ruptured Histories: War, Memory, and the Post-Cold War in Asia (pp. 209–232). Harvard University Press. Vickers, E., & Jones, A. (2005). History Education and National Identity in East Asia. Routledge. Wang, F. (2005). Why Bother about School Textbooks?: An Analysis of the Origin of the Disputes over Renshi Taiwan Textbooks in 1997. In J. Makeham & A. -chi. Hsiau (Eds.), Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan: Bentuhua (First Edition., pp. 55–99). Palgrave Macmillan. Wang, X. (2010a, April). 有關歷史課綱，我也有話要說 [With regard to the history curriculum I also want to say something]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/232-7843.html Wang, X. (2010b, April). 站出來，保衛我們台灣人民的歷史 . 駁周碗窈和『98課綱』[Stand up, protect the history of us Taiwanese against Zhou Wanyao and the 98 curriculum]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/232-7831.html Wang, X. (2010c, May). 拜託，台灣「國史」請暫且存放一下吧！[Please, give up on the notion that Taiwanese history is national history!]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/233-7869.html Wang, X. (2010d, May). 堅決反對「皇民史觀」[Firmly opposed to the ‘Japanese historical perspective‘]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/233-7871.html Wang, X. (2010e, November). 撥亂反正乎，為德不卒乎. 評高中歷史教科書課程綱要修訂草案[Bringing order out of chaos started out with virtue but failed to carry things through. Comment on the revised Draft of the High School History Curriculum Guidelines]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 15, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/239.html Wang, X. (2012a, July). 馬英九切莫作歷史的罪人 [Ma Yingjiu you must not make history sinners]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 16, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/259.html Wang, X. (2012b, August). 撥亂反正，回歸憲法 [Bringing Order Out of Chaos, Return to the Constitution.]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 16, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/260-8517.html Wang, X., Wu, S., & Sun, Y. (2010). 甲案大綱 [Jia-draft Outline]. Google Docs. Retrieved June 6, 2013, from https://docs.google.com/file/d/0ByXtXmyiwurMZmExNmY2ZmMtYjQ4Mi00NDk4LWEzNWItZjQyZGFmNWU3OGVl/edit?hl=zh_TW Wang, & Xu, S. (2010, September 16). 臺灣史上溯三國 沒啥好怕的 [Taiwanese history goes back to the Three Kingdoms, There is nothing to be afraid of]. China Times. Retrieved March 2, 2013, from http://news.chinatimes.com/forum/0,5252,110514x112010091600434,00.html Wang, Zheng. (2008). National Humiliation, History Education, and the Politics of Historical Memory: Patriotic Education Campaign in China. International Studies Quarterly, 52(4), 783–806. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00526.x Wang, Zhongfu. (2003, November). 《高中歷史新課程綱要草案》何以如此荒謬 [How can there exist something as ridiculus as “The New High School History Curriculum Guidelines Draft”]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 20, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/155-288.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2004, December). 對《高中歷史課程綱要草案》的基本認識 [The Basic Understanding of the Senior High School History Curriculum Guidelines Draft]. haixiainfo. Retrieved April 18, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/SRM/168-5566.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2008a, May). 向馬英九建言 》消弭教育亂象的正本清源之道 [A letter to Ma Yingjiu: the radical way to erase the chaos of education]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/209-7185.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2008b, July). 台灣教育問題 》對於新任教育部長的期待與疑慮 [The problems of Taiwanese education: the doubts and expectations towards the new acting minister of education]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/211-7241.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2008c, September). 《高中歷史九八課綱》應全面檢討 重新擬定 [The “98 high-school history curriculum guidelines” reviewed in their entirety and formulated from scratch]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/213-7283.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2009a, March). 《高中歷史九八課綱》修訂成敗的關鍵 [The key for the success or failure of the revision of the „98 High School History Curriculum“]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/219-7463.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2009b, September). 國可亡，史不可亡 [A country can die, history does not die]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/225-7680.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2010a, April). 修訂中的高中歷史課綱「大復辟」了嗎？[Is the revsion of the high-school history curriculum guidelines a “big restauration”?]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/232-7844.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2010b, June). 具有「爭議性」史事不能列入歷史課綱？ [“Controversial” historical facts can not be included in the history curriculum?]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/234-7892.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2011, July). 論「高中歷史新課綱」的根本問題 [Discussion of the fundamental problems of the “New High School History Curriculum Guidelines”]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 16, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/247-8199.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2012, July). 高中歷史課程的修正能否寄望「12年國教」課綱 [Can the revised high school history curriculum place its hopes on the “12 year basic education” curriculum?]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 16, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/259-8502.html Whitehead, A. (2008). Memory. Routledge. Working Group. (2010, September 28). 請各位課綱委員饒了我們吧∥高中歷史老師的心聲 [Members of the Editorial Committee, please forgive us // The voice of the High School Teachers]. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from http://98history.blogspot.tw/2010/09/blog-post_23.html Wu, K. (2004, November 11). 人為改造的歷史傳不久[(Re-)constructed history won´t last long]. UnitedDailyNews. Retrieved April 19, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/news/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=4077 Wu, M. (2005, January). 由「高中歷史課程綱要」之爭論 [The controversy over the high-school history curriculum guidelines]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 3, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/169-640.html Wu, Z. (2010, September 19). 高中歷史新課綱 為難師生 [The New High School History Curriculum becomes a Problem for Teachers and Students]. United Daily News. Retrieved March 3, 2013, from http://udn.com/NEWS/OPINION/X1/5857892.shtml Xie, D. (2012, July). 教科書「回歸憲法規範」也錯了嗎？[Is it also wrong that education is “returning to the regulations of the constitution”?]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 16, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/259-8501.html Xu, R. (2010, September 19). 高中歷史新課綱公聽會 砲聲隆隆 [The Public Hearing for the New High School History Curriculum Guidelines: Rumbling]. United Daily News. Retrieved March 2, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/campus/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=272331 Xu, Z. (2004, November 24). 許倬雲-我對史學爭議的看法 [Xu Zhuoyun - My opinion about the history education controversy]. China Times. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://www.360doc.com/content/07/0624/22/24133_577978.shtml Xue, H. (2010, February 26). 高中「台灣史不縮水」 課綱共識 [Curriculum Consens: High School Taiwanese history will not shrink]. United Dayily News. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/campus/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=236899 Yan, G. (2012a, July 5). 兩岸/學者：歷史教科書改革不能只做半套 [Cross Strait/Scholars: The Reform of the High School History Textbooks can not only go half way]. cdnews. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.cdnews.com.tw/cdnews_site/docDetail.jsp?coluid=141&docid=101960717 Yan, G. (2012b, July 12). 教科書/馬:台獨化皇民化內容應刪除 [Textbooks / Ma: The Content that Contains Taiwanization and Japanization has to be erased]. CDnews. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.cdnews.com.tw/cdnews_site/docDetail.jsp?coluid=106&docid=101968429 Yan, W. (2010, September 16). 高中歷史課綱／東南亞史觀何去何從？公聽會激辯 [High School History Curriculum Guidelines / What path should be followed with regard to the history of SOE? Fierce debate at the public hearing]. United Dayily News. Retrieved April 22, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/campus/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=271836 Yang, M. (2004, November 10). 台灣反對黨譴責歷史教科書切割兩岸 [Taiwan´s opposition party denounces that the history textbooks cut both sides of the Taiwan Strait]. BBC. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/trad/hi/newsid_3990000/newsid_3998400/3998495.stm Yang, S. (2010a, February 28). 新政府高中歷史課綱的修訂是「向上提升」？抑或「往下沈淪」？[Is the revision of the high school history curriculum by the new government an improvement or a downgrading?]. 98高中歷史課綱. Retrieved from http://98history.blogspot.tw/2010/02/blog-post_4786.html Yang, S. (2010b, March 12). 救救高中生 [Save the high-school students]. Liberty Times. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/mar/12/today-o2.htm Yu, W. (2010, September 18). 高中歷史新課綱 缺世界觀 [The New High School History Curriculum Guidelines lack a Globalized Point of View]. United Dayily News. Retrieved April 22, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/campus/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=272211 Zeng, W. (2010, February 25). 走回頭路的歷史教育 [The history education is walking backwards]. 曾韋禎的部落格. Retrieved from http://blog.roodo.com/weichen/archives/11800163.html Zeng, W., & Guo, F. (2010, September 19). 高中歷史六冊/三冊都有中國史 高中老師憂心 [Three of six high school history books all contain Chinese history - High School Teachers worry]. 自由電子報 Liberty Times. Retrieved April 22, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/sep/19/today-life2.htm Zeng, W., & Lin, X. (2010a, February 25). 課綱修訂委員憂台灣危機／高中中國史 比重要加倍 [Curriculum guidelines revision committee members worried about a Taiwan crisis / The focus of high school history education will be on China]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/feb/25/today-t1.htm# Zeng, W., & Lin, X. (2010b, February 25). 歷史科重修一年 爭議多[History education has been revised for one year and causes many controversies]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/feb/25/today-life2-2.htm Zeng, W., & Lin, X. (2010c, February 28). 高中歷史課綱 中國史加半學期 [High School History Curriculum: Chinese History increased by a half semester]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 19, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/feb/28/today-life8.htm Zhang, Q. (2004, November 15). 台灣地位未定論 列入高中歷史教材惹爭議 [The controversy over the inclusion of “the debate over Taiwan´s unresolved status” in the high school history teaching material]. New Taiwan. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://www.newtaiwan.com.tw/bulletinview.jsp?bulletinid=20233 Zhang, Yuan. (2003, September 20). 下一代更需要歷史知識 [The next generation needS historical knowledge even more]. China Review. Taipei. Zhang, Yuteng. (2010, March 27). 張譽騰：歷史感的窮困 [Zhang Yuteng: The wretched poverty of the sense of history]. 98history. Retrieved from http://98history.blogspot.tw/2010/03/blog-post_6478.html Zhou, L. (2010). 歷史的尊嚴和歷史的留白。談高中歷史教育及課程綱要 [The honor of history and the white spots of history. Discussing high school history education and curriculum guidelines]. Contemporary, 244, 42–54. Zhou, P. (2012, June 11). 高中歷史教科書難產 鄭麗君：張亞中是幕後黑手 [Difficult birth of the high-school history textbooks. Zheng Lijun: Zhang Yazhong is a criminal behind the scenes]. ETtoday. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://www.ettoday.net/news/20120611/56227.htm Zhou, W. (2010a). 改良還是改劣.評擴大中國史壓縮世界史的九九新高中歷史課綱 [Improvement or „Verschlimmbesserung“ (improvement for the worse)? Discussing the new 99 curriculum guidelines that enlarge Chinese history and compress world history]. 244, 55–64. Zhou, W. (2010b, February 8). 新政府撥亂反正？還是歷史教育大復辟？高中歷史課綱要改成怎樣，請大家來關心！[Does the new government bring order out of chaos? Or does history education reclaim its rightful place? Please everybody care how the high-school history curriculum should be revised!]. esouth. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://enews.url.com.tw/south/56491 Zhou, W. (2010c, March 9). 高中臺灣史教學散策 [The loosened policy of Taiwanese history teaching]. 98history. Retrieved from http://98history.blogspot.tw/2010/03/blog-post_09.html#more Zhou, W., Wang, W., Lin, G., & Lin, X. (2010). 丙案大綱 [Bing-draft Outline]. Google Docs. Retrieved June 6, 2013, from https://docs.google.com/file/d/0ByXtXmyiwurMMGQ5ZWQ0YmUtY2I3ZC00MzU4LTg2Y2UtMmJjYTk5MzNhZTNi/edit?hl=zh_TW Zhu, P. (2012, July 16). 當殖民者揮舞外來憲法 [A constitution designed by colonialists from outside]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jul/16/today-o2.htm Zou, J. (2010, September 20). 自由電子報 - 《星期專訪》張炎憲︰馬政治指導歷史課綱 [Weekly Exclusive Interview: Zhang Yanxian: The Ma Administration guides the History Curriculum Guiedelines]. The Liberty Times. Retrieved April 22, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/sep/20/today-p5.htm 中日和約 [Treaty of Taipei]. (1952, April 28). Academia Historica. Retrieved May 30, 2013, from http://www.drnh.gov.tw/Content_Display.aspx?MenuKey=48 管碧玲、賴清德與社團赴教育部與吳清基討論高中歷史課程綱要 [DPP requests MOE to discuss the curriculum]. (2010). MOE. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrFEu3aRb0I&feature=youtube_gdata_player 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
100926030
101資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1009260302 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 李福鐘 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Li, Fu Chung en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 沈拓筆 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Tobias Stenzel en_US dc.creator (作者) 沈拓筆 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Tobias Stenzel en_US dc.date (日期) 2012 en_US dc.date.accessioned 2-九月-2013 17:41:12 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 2-九月-2013 17:41:12 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-九月-2013 17:41:12 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G1009260302 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59611 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 100926030 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 101 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) This thesis examines the politics of history education, collective memory and identity in contemporary Taiwan through a qualitative case study of the high-school history curriculum reform and controversy from 2002 to 2012. Through eight elite interviews, the evaluation of an extensive amount of primary sources, and the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the relevant history curricula and other official documents, I find that the most visible part of the controversy is a conflict between advocates of a “China-centered historical perspective” and the representatives of a “Taiwan-centered historical perspective”, who both try to reclaim the territory of national history to have their collective memory represented in it. Furthermore, my analysis of the relevant history curricula indicates that all of them are representative of the collective memory of more than one group. This demonstrates that the influence political parties can exert on history education is constrained by competing versions of collective memory. The thesis also shows how the strong tendency towards Taiwan-centered view on history within society has been translated into the history curriculum after the DPP created conducive conditions for meaningful change. Subsequently, the KMT tried to exert influence on the revision process, but continuous attention from the public prevented major changes. In the final analysis, it is very difficult for any political party or powerful group within contemporary Taiwan to impose one exclusive version of the past as national master narrative on the whole society. Competing collective memories of sub-national groups continue to co-exist within civil society, which demands for a more pluralist history curriculum that incorporates smaller “memory communities” in the national narrative to forestall social disunity and further controversy. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Table of Contents Acknowledgments 3 Abstract 4 List of Abbreviations 7 1 Introduction 1 2 Literature Review and Theoretical Background 7 2.1 Shifts in History Education and National Identity 7 2.1.1 Nationalist education (1947-1997) and reform in the 1990s 7 2.1.2 The Knowing Taiwan textbook controversy 9 2.1.3 Divided Taiwanese identity 11 2.2 The Senior High School History Curriculum Controversy 13 2.2.1 Theoretical foundations 14 2.2.1.1 Collective memory, identity and history 14 2.2.1.2 The conflict between national history and collective memory 15 2.2.1.3 Limitations for the construction of a national history 17 2.2.1.4 History education and identity 19 2.2.2 Collective memory in the history curriculum controversy 20 2.2.3 Research questions 22 2.2.4 Methodology 23 2.2.5 Motivation 25 2.2.6 Implications and limitations 26 3. Main Part: The High-school History Curriculum Reform & Controversy 27 3.1 First Part: The Drafting Process from 2002 to 2008 27 3.1.1 The background of educational reform under the Chen administration 27 3.1.2 The drafting of the 94 curriculum guidelines 29 3.1.3 The controversy over the 94 draft 33 3.1.4 Discussion of the controversy 38 3.1.5 Collapse of the 94 draft and replacement by the 95 curriculum 39 3.1.6 Drafting principles of the 95 temporary guidelines 41 3.1.7 Curricular changes from the 94 draft to the 95 temp. curriculum 44 3.1.8 Comparison to earlier curricula 46 3.1.9 Controversy over the 95 temporary curriculum 48 3.1.9.1 Overview 48 3.1.9.2 High-school history teachers oppose the 95 temp. curriculum 49 3.1.9.3 The 95 temporary curriculum and ideology 51 3.1.9.4 Taiwanese history taught independently in the 1st semester 52 3.1.9.5 The period under Qing rule on Taiwan 54 3.1.9.6 Japanese colonial history 54 3.1.9.7 ROC history “cut in half” 56 3.1.9.8 “Debate Over the Unresolved Status of Taiwan” 57 3.1.9.9 Post-WWII ROC history too negative 60 3.1.10 The Politics of history education 60 3.2 Second Part: The Revision Process from 2008 to 2012 62 3.2.1 The collapse of the 98 curriculum 62 3.2.1.1 The 98 curriculum is waiting in the wings 62 3.2.1.2 Changes from the 95 temp. curriculum to the 98 curriculum 64 3.2.1.3 Pro-unification lobbying and the shelving of the 98 curriculum 67 3.2.2 The revision process and the controversy within the committee 69 3.2.2.1 The initiation of the revision process 69 3.2.2.2 The controversy within the revision committee 71 3.2.2.3 Comparison of the jia-and bing-drafts 73 3.2.3 The public controversy 80 3.2.3.1 Introduction 80 3.2.3.2 The first phase 82 3.2.3.3 The second phase 89 3.2.3.3.1 Introduction 89 3.2.3.3.2 Changes from the 98 curriculum to the 101 curriculum draft 90 3.2.3.3.3 The controversy in the public 96 3.2.3.3.4 The public hearings 98 3.2.3.3.5 The controversy within the elite 100 3.2.4 The final verdict 102 3.2.5 Last-minute introduction of covert extracurricular requirements 107 4. Conclusion 112 4.1 Findings 112 4.2 Discussion and Outlook 116 5. Bibliography 120 zh_TW dc.language.iso en_US - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1009260302 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 歷史教育政治 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 集體記憶 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 身份認同 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 科課綱改革 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 歷史爭議 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 臺灣 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) politics of history education en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) collective memory en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) identity en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) curriculum reform en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) history controversy en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Taiwan en_US dc.title (題名) 歷史教育政治、集體記憶與身份認同：普通高級中學歷史科課綱改革與爭議案例研究(2002-2012) zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Politics of History Education, Collective Memory & Identity: A Case Study of the High-school History Curriculum Reform and Controversy in Taiwan from 2002 to 2012 en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. Bibliography Ahn, Y. (2008). De-nationalising and Re-nationalising the Past. In S. Richter (Ed.), Contested Views of a Common Past: Revisions of History in Contemporary East Asia (pp. 11–46). Campus Verlag. Anderson, B. R. O. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso. Anderson, P. (2004). Union Sucrée. In: London Review of Books, 26 (18), pp. 10-16. London Review of Books, 26(18), 10–16. Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and Curriculum (3rd ed.). Routledge. Bodnar, J. (1992). Remaking America: Public Memory, Commemoration and Patriotism in the Twentieth Century. Princeton University Press. Cai, B. (2004, April 4). 歷史教育不宜腰斬 [History education inappropriately cut in half]. Apple Daily. Retrieved May 22, 2013, from http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/supplement/20040404/833065/ Cai, W. (2004, December 13). 沒有學生的歷史課 [There is no history education for students]. UnitedDailyNews. Retrieved April 19, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/news/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=5660 Cairo Communique. (1943, December 1). National Diet Library. Retrieved May 30, 2013, from http://www.ndl.go.jp/constitution/e/shiryo/01/002_46shoshi.html Chang, B. (2004). From Taiwanization to de-Sinicization. China perpectives, (56). Retrieved from http://chinaperspectives.revues.org/438 Chang, L. (2008). Re-imagining Community from Different Shores: Nationalism, Post-colonialism and Colonial Modernity in Taiwanese Historiography. In S. Richter (Ed.), Contested Views of a Common Past: Revisions of History in Contemporary East Asia (pp. 139–155). Campus Verlag. Chang, L. (2011). Telling histories of an island nation. In G. Müller (Ed.), Designing History in East Asian Textbooks: Identity Politics and Transnational Aspirations (Vols. 1-1, Vol. 1, pp. 117–134). New York: Routledge. Chang, Y.-P. (2003, October 18). Scholars press to rewrite history. Taipei Times. Retrieved March 7, 2013, from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2003/10/18/2003072377 Chen, J. (2004, December). 誤國誤民的民進黨政府台灣地位未定論 [The DPP discourse of the unresolved status of Taiwan with the wrong country and the wrong people]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/168-7196.html Chen, J.-J. (2002). Reforming textbooks, reshaping school knowledge: Taiwan’s textbook deregulation in the 1990s. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 10(1), 39–72. doi:10.1080/14681360200200129 Chen, Ro-jinn. (2003, October 3). History must be studied in context. Taipei Times. Retrieved March 7, 2013, from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2003/10/03/2003070235 Chen, Ruoshui. (2010). 九九年高中歷史課綱 / 中國與東亞部分評議 [The 2010 high-school history curriculum guidelines / Assessment of the China and East-Asia part]. Contemporary, 244, 65–71. Chen, W. (2005). The History of an Alien-Nation, or the Alienation of History? The Controversy over History Textbook Reform in Taiwan in the 90s. Asia Pacific Forum, 28, 90–103. Chen, X. (2010, September 17). 臺灣史上溯三國 當三思 [Taiwanese history traced back to the Three Kingdoms. Three thoughts]. China Times. Retrieved March 2, 2013, from http://news.chinatimes.com/reading/0,5251,51301374x112010091700430,00.html Chen, Yishen. (2010, February 26). 撥亂反正 正反亂撥 [Bringing order out of chaos - Bringing chaos out of order]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/feb/26/today-o2.htm Chen, Yujun. (2003, November). 清史是外國史係數典忘祖 [To treat Qing history as the history of a foreign country is the same as to recount history but omit one‘s ancestors]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 20, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/155-289.html Chen, Zhongning. (2010, February 28). 大家談: 過往所看不見的台灣政治史 [Unseen past Taiwanese political history]. 98history. Retrieved from http://98history.blogspot.tw/2010/02/blog-post_28.html Chen, Ziyu. (2012, June 12). 中教司長，我也是民眾！[Directed at the head of high-school education, I am also the people!]. Liberty Times. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/12/today-o8.htm China Times. (2010, September 19). 短 評－是該往南看一看 [Short critic: one should look south]. Retrieved April 22, 2013, from http://news.chinatimes.com/forum/0,5252,11051402x112010091900253,00.html CNA. (2012, June 11). 國教院：教科書名詞依法令界定 [MOE: the terms in the textbooks are defined according to decree]. Radio Taiwan International. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://news.rti.org.tw/index_newsContent.aspx?nid=359828 Corcuff, S. (2005). History Textbooks, Identity Politics, and Ethnic Introspection in Taiwan: The June 1997 Knowing Taiwan Textbooks Controversy and the Questions It Raised on the Various Approaches to “Han” Identity. In E. Vickers & A. Jones (Eds.), History Education and National Identity in East Asia (pp. 133–169). New York: Routledge. Declaration. (2010, April 1). 【聯合聲明】抵抗中國史觀的台灣史，蔡英文主席不應沉默 [Joint Declaration: Resist the Chinese Historical Viewpoint of Taiwanese History, Chairperson Tsai Ying-wen should not remain silent]. Retrieved from http://98history.blogspot.tw/2010/04/blog-post.html Du, Z. (2004). 一個新史觀的誕生//新史學之 [The birth of a new historical perspective // The new road of historiography]. Taipei: Sanmin Publishing. Du, Z. (2010, April 29). 成大論壇 前教育部長杜正勝暢談台灣主體教育 | 中央社訊息平台 [Forum at the National Cheng Kung University (NCKU): The former Minister of Education Du Zhengsheng talks freely about the eduction with Taiwan at the center]. CNA. Nachrichten. Retrieved February 27, 2013, from http://www.cna.com.tw/postwrite/Detail/57170.aspx Editorial. (2010, February 26). 馬政府要消滅台灣意識灌輸大中國史觀 [The Ma administration wants to put an end to Taiwanese consciousness by teaching the Greater China historical point of view]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/feb/26/today-s1.htm Foucault, M. (1975). Film in Popular Memory: An Interview with Michael Foucault. Radical Philosophy, 2, 24–29. Freeman, C. W. (1996). Same Strait, Different Memories. In G. W. Gong (Ed.), Remembering and Forgetting: The Legacy of War and Peace in East Asia (pp. 38–59). CSIS. FTV. (2012, June 11). 教材去台灣化?立委爆有黑手 [Teaching material faces de-Taiwanization? Legislator claims there is a criminal]. FTV News. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://news.ftv.com.tw/NewsContent.aspx?ntype=class&sno=2012611P13M1 Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and Method. Continuum International Publishing Group. Gong, G. W. (1996). Remembering and Forgetting: The Legacy of War and Peace in East Asia. CSIS. Greene, J. M. (2008). History, Identity, and Politics: the First Chen Shui-bian Administration’s Efforts to Craft Taiwan’s History. In S. Goldstein & J. Chang (Eds.), Presidential Politics in Taiwan (pp. 115–141). Guo, Y. (2012, June 11). 宰殺文化 高中歷史課本去台灣化遭批 [To butcher culture. The high-school history books become de-Taiwanized]. IDN News. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://www.idn.com.tw/news/news_content.php?catid=4&catsid=2&catdid=0&artid=20120611abcd027 Guo, Z. (2005). 歷史教育與時代聚焦的轉變：以2000年高中歷史教科書下冊為例的討論 [The transformation of history education and the foci of the times: discussion based on history textbooks for senior high school freshmen in 2000]. http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089153012. Retrieved from http://nccuir.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33578 HaixiaInfo. (2004, December). 違憲竄史罪不容.嚴厲警告陳水扁、杜正勝 [The death penalty is not enough to punish unconstitutional change of history. A strict warning to Chen Shuibian and Du Zhengsheng]. HaixiaInfo. Retrieved April 18, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/SRM/168.html Halbwachs, M. (1980). The collective memory. New York: Harper & Row. Halbwachs, M. (1992). On Collective Memory. (L. A. Coser, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. Hao, B. (2012, February 21). 郝柏村：正視中學史地課本 [Hao Bocun: Facing squarely the high-school history and geography books]. Retrieved June 15, 2013, from http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NAT3/6913779.shtml Hong, B. (2010a, September). 高中歷史教學裡的征服者與被征服者角度 [The Perspective of the Conquerors and the Conquered in High-school history education]. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCoQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2F203.68.236.93%2Fdoc%2Farticle%2F990730.doc&ei=l0G5UeKRCsmokgXynoHwAw&usg=AFQjCNH2MPqFx-R2PPOuN-kH55JJEUCT-g&sig2=I7H-zvSKNlTxTF0xGQKnDQ&bvm=bv.47883778,d.dGI Hong, B. (2010b, October 2). 原住民 再征服 [Aboriginal People. Conquered Again.]. 自由電子報 Liberty Times. Retrieved March 3, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/oct/2/today-o10.htm Hong, Z. (2010, September 17). 高中歷史課綱 統獨史觀拉鋸 [The High School History Curriculum Guidelines. The to-and-fro between the Independence and Unification historical perspectives]. China Times. Retrieved March 2, 2013, from http://news.chinatimes.com/reading/0,5251,51301374x112010091700519,00.html Hsiau, A.-C. (2000). Contemporary Taiwanese Cultural Nationalism. Routledge Chapman & Hall. Hsieh, J. F. (2005). Ethnicity, National Identity, and Domestic Politics in Taiwan. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 40(1-2), 13–28. doi:10.1177/0021909605052936 Hsueh H. (2009). 從歷史文獻看台灣國際的定位問題 [Looking at the historical documents that pertain to the question of Taiwan´s international status]. In Discussion Forum of Taiwan´s International Status (pp. 87–100). Retrieved from http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/53314 Hu, Q. (2011, May 11). 加重中國史 歷史課綱定案被轟 [Increase of Chinse history. The final verdict over the history curriculum is under attack]. Retrieved May 8, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2011/new/may/11/today-education1.htm Hu, Q., & Li, X. (2010, March 29). 中國史擬擴編 社團籲全民抵抗 [Chinese history to be expanded, Associations ask everybody to protest]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 23, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/mar/29/today-t2.htm Hu, Y. (2010, March 10). 那曾錯過的臺灣史教育 [This missed out opportunity in Taiwanese history education]. 98history. Retrieved from http://98history.blogspot.tw/2010/03/blog-post_10.html#more Huang, C. (2005). Dimensions of Taiwanese/Chinese Identity and National Identity in Taiwan A Latent Class Analysis. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 40(1-2), 51–70. Huang, J. (2003, October 16). Legislators clash over high school history textbooks. Taipei Times. Retrieved February 7, 2013, from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2003/10/16/2003071831 Huang, J. (2004, April 29). New education minister could spell reform: analysts. Taipei Times. News. Retrieved May 22, 2013, from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2004/04/29/2003138490 Huang, Yijing. (2004, November 15). 捲入歷史風暴 周樑楷挺直腰桿 [Drawn into the history storm - Zhou Liangkuai walks tall]. Liberty Times. Retrieved March 7, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2004/new/nov/15/today-p2.htm Huang, Yimin. (2012, June 12). 哪個「民眾」在去台灣化？[Which “public” is de-Taiwanizing?]. Liberty Times. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/12/today-o7.htm Huang, Z. (2010, February 26). 駁斥王曉波的謬論 [Refute the misconception of Wang Xiaobo]. HI-ON. Retrieved May 15, 2013, from http://www.hi-on.org.tw/bulletins.jsp?b_ID=98092 Huntington, S. P. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century (Vol. 4). Norman and London: University of Oklahoma Press. Jager, S. M., & Mitter, R. (Eds.). (2007). Ruptured Histories: War, Memory, and the Post-Cold War in Asia. Harvard University Press. Jiang, C. (2010a). 作繭自縛的歷史史觀 [A historical perspective that spins a cocoon around itself]. Contemporary, 244, 82–85. Jiang, C. (2010b, March 13). 奴才教科書 [Textbook Slavery]. 自由電子報 Liberty Times. Retrieved February 20, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/mar/13/today-o4.htm Jiang, Z. (2012, June 11). 教科書去台灣化？教育部：回歸課綱與憲法規定 [De-Taiwanization of textbooks? MOE: Return to the Curriculum and the regulations of the constitution]. Yam News. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://n.yam.com/rti/politics/20120611/20120611532938.html Jun, C. (2005, February 2). 歷史教科書大綱爭議與公民社會[The controversy over the main points in the history textbook and civil society]. Retrieved April 20, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/news/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=7725 Lan, W. (2010, February 10). 高中不教台灣史了？[There will be no Taiwanese history taught in High School?]. Formosapost. Retrieved May 15, 2013, from http://www.formosapost.com.tw/blog.php?do=showone&uid=86&type=blog&itemid=2651 Legislative Yuan. (2003, November 3). 立法院公報 92：45 頁352-355 [Legislative Yuan Announcement 92: 45 page 352-355]. Retrieved June 5, 2013, from http://lci.ly.gov.tw/LyLCEW/lcivCommMore.action#pageName_searchResult=5 Li, G. (2004, December). 扭曲的史觀 [Twisting the historical perspective]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/168-5567.html Li, M. (2004, November 11). 高中歷史 中國史台灣史分離 [High School History: History of China and Taiwan separated]. udn.com. Retrieved April 19, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/news/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=4082 Li, Y., Lin, X., & Huang, W. (2012, July 17). 立委批馬指示修改歷史教科書 [Legislator criticizes that Ma instructs the modification of history textbooks]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jul/17/today-p3.htm Li, Z. (2010, September 27). 王曉波：新版高中歷史教科書 沒去中國化問題 [Wang Xiaobo: There will be no problem of de-Sinicization in the new version of the high school history textbooks]. China Review News. Retrieved April 30, 2013, from http://www.chinareviewnews.com/doc/1014/5/8/0/101458059.html?coluid=7&kindid=0&docid=101458059&mdate=0927110151 Lin, C. (2012, June 27). 教科書去台灣化 綠：不符合全民共識 [De-Taiwanization of Textbooks. Green: Not in line with the consensus of the entire population]. Yam News. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://n.yam.com/newtalk/politics/20120627/20120627581889.html Lin, G. (2010a). 對高中歷史課綱的看法. 一個高中老師的觀點 [Opinion about the High-school history curriculum guidelines / From the perspective of a high-school teacher]. Contemporary, 244, 72–78. Lin, M. (2012). 高中歷史教科書。以《中日和約》定位台灣 [High-school history textbooks. Taiwan’s status is decided upon by the Treaty of Taipei]. 主權在我-《中日和約》之時代意義 [The sovereignty is with me - the significance of the era of the Treaty of Taipei], 34–39. Lin, S. (2010, February 25). 高中增中國史時數 綠批教育中國化 [High school Chinese history increases, The green camp criticices the Sinization of Education]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 19, 2013, from http://iservice.libertytimes.com.tw/liveNews/news.php?no=334712&type=%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB Lin, Xiaoyun. (2010a, June 29). 高中歷史課綱修訂草案 強銷統派史觀 [The revised draft of the High School history curriculum guidelines unyieldingly see the historical perspective of the “Unification Faction”]. 自由電子報 Liberty Times. Retrieved February 27, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/jun/29/today-t1.htm Lin, Xiaoyun. (2010b, September 13). 台灣史上溯三國 學者斥強銷統派史觀 [Taiwanese History is traced to the Three Kingdoms Period (220-280), Scholars blame the implementation of the historical perspective of the Unification Faction]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 27, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/sep/13/today-t2.htm Lin, Xiaoyun. (2011, May 10). 自由電子報 - 偷渡中國史課程？本土社團批教部霸凌 [Chinese history illegally introduced in the curriculum? Bentu Society criticizes the MOE]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 8, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2011/new/may/10/today-life5.htm Lin, Xiaoyun. (2012a, June 25). 教團︰教科書非當權者工具 設獨立委會 斷政治黑手 [Education Association: The History Textbooks are not a tool for those in power. There has to be set up an independent committee to break the political Criminals]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/25/today-fo3.htm Lin, Xiaoyun. (2012b, July 10). 高中歷史教科書爭議 鄭麗君赴教育部送意見書 [The High School History Textbook Controversy. Zheng Lijun forwarded an Opinion Letter to the MOE]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://iservice.libertytimes.com.tw/liveNews/news.php?no=664588&type=%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB Lin, Xiaoyun. (2012c, July 11). 五千人連署╱反竄改歷史教材 立委致教長「大眾意見書」[5 thousand people have signed the petition / Oppose the modification of the history teaching material. Legislator forwarded the “Opinion of the Masses Document” to the Minister of Education]. Li. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jul/11/today-p4.htm Lin, Xiaoyun, & Hu, Q. (2010, September 14). 自由電子報 - 爭議性素材入課綱／台灣史上溯添困惑 家長聯盟︰放孩子一馬吧 [Controversial Source Material enters the Curriculum Guidelines / The retracing of Taiwanese history creates bewilderment; Nation Alliance of Parents Organization: Please Spare our Children]. Liberty Times. Retrieved March 1, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/sep/14/today-p2.htm Lin, Xiaoyun, & Hu, Q. (2012, June 11). 教師︰傷害學生受教權 [Teacher: This violates the student´s right for education]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/11/today-p3.htm Lin, Xiaoyun, & Huang, Y. (2012a, June 25). 反竄改歷史教科書 連署破4千 [Petition against the modifiction of the History Textbooks has already been signed 4000 times]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/25/today-fo1.htm Lin, Xiaoyun, & Huang, Y. (2012b, June 25). 立委︰公布名單與專業背景 編審怎麼聘 教部須踹共 [Legislator: Names List Publication and Professional Background. How should the Examination Committee Members be picked. MOE kicks public opinion]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/25/today-fo2.htm?Slots=All Lin, Xiaoyun, Tang, Zeng, W., & Liu, R. (2010, February 27). 學者：台灣史才是國史 [Scholar: Only Taiwanese history is national history]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 19, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/feb/27/today-life9.htm Lin, Xiaoyun, & Zeng, W. (2010, February 25). 網友論戰：中國文化派焦慮 拿教科書治療 [The heated debate of an netizen: The Chinese Culture Clique is anxious and tries to make textbooks their psychological treatment]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/feb/25/today-life2.htm Lin, Xiaoyun, Zeng, W., & Lin, S. (2010, February 26). 高中歷史課綱台灣史起點 王曉波論點再惹爭議 [The High School History Curriculum takes Taiwanese history as the starting point: Wang Xiaobo´s line of reasoning causes a controversy once again]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/feb/26/today-life7.htm Lin, Xinyi, & Peng, Y. (2012, June 11). 高中歷史被控去台灣化 教部否認 [The high-school history has been accused of de-Taiwanization. MOE denies]. 公視新聞網. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://news.pts.org.tw/detail.php?NEENO=212598 Lin, Z. (2010b, September 14). 歷史課新課綱中國史教不完 1→1.5學期 [The Chinese History in the New Curriculum can not be taught to the end in 1semester and is thus extended to 1.5 semsters]. China Times. Retrieved March 1, 2013, from http://news.chinatimes.com/focus/0,5243,50106574x112010091400125,00.html Lin, Z. (2010c, September 14). 台灣史溯三國？可教學生解釋歷史[Traceing Taiwanese History to the Time of the Three Kingdoms? This can teach students to interpret history]. China Times. Retrieved March 1, 2013, from http://news.chinatimes.com/focus/0,5243,50106574x112010091400126,00.html Lin, Z. (2012, July 11). 高中歷史課本爭議 教長：專業審定 [High School History Textbook Controversy. Minister of Education: Professional Examination and Approval]. China Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://life.chinatimes.com/2009Cti/Channel/Life/life-article/0,5047,11051801+112012071100051,00.html Liu, J., Chen, J., & Zhang, G. (2012, June 20). 「我是民眾，我反對竄改歷史」連署中 [I am the people, I oppose the modification of history.petition]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/20/today-o3.htm Liu, M.-H., Hung, L.-C., & Vickers, E. (2005). Identity Issues in Taiwan´s History Curriculum. In E. Vickers & A. Jones (Eds.), History Education and National Identity in East Asia (pp. 101–131). New York: Routledge. Liu, Xiaoxia. (2004, November 11). 歷史應多元 避免扯入政爭[History has to be pluralistic to avoid to become a the subject of political partisan fighting]. Retrieved April 19, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/news/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=4063 Liu, Xiaoxia. (2010, February 27). 中選會公佈立委補選投票率僅4成上下 [The Central Election Commission announces that the turnout of the Legislative Yuan by-election was only around 40%]. CTS. Retrieved June 16, 2013, from http://news.cts.com.tw/cnyes/money/201002/201002270418104.html Liu, Xinyuan. (2003, October 15). 高中歷史新課程綱要的來龍去脈 [The sequence of events of the new high school history curriculum guidelines]. National Policy Foundation. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/EC/092/EC-B-092-055.htm Liu, Xinyuan. (2004, December 15). 高中歷史新課程綱要的爭議 [The controversy over the new high school history curriculum guidelines]. National Policy Foundation. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/EC/093/EC-B-093-047.htm Ller-Saini, G. M. (2011). Designing History in East Asian Textbooks. Taylor & Francis. Makeham, J. (2005). Introduction. In J. Makeham & A. -chi. Hsiau (Eds.), Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan: Bentuhua (First Edition., pp. 3–14). Palgrave Macmillan. Makeham, J., & Hsiau, A. -chi. (Eds.). (2005). Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan: Bentuhua (First Edition.). Palgrave Macmillan. Mao, C.-J. (2008). Fashioning curriculum reform as identity politics—Taiwan’s dilemma of curriculum reform in new millennium. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(5), 585–595. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.10.005 Middleton, D., & Brown, D. S. D. (2005). The Social Psychology of Experience: Studies in Remembering and Forgetting. SAGE. MOE. (1971). 高級中學課程標準 [Senior High-school Curriculum Standard]. Taipei: 正中書局印行 [Zhengzhong Publishing]. MOE. (1983). 高級中學課程標準 [Senior High-school Curriculum Standard]. Taipei: 正中書局印行 [Zhengzhong Publishing]. MOE. (1996). 高級中學課程標準 [Senior High-school Curriculum Standard]. Taipei: Ministry of Education. MOE. (2004). 中華民國教育年報(92) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2003)]. Taipei. MOE. (2005a). 中華民國教育年報(93) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2004)]. Taipei. MOE. (2005b). 普通高級中學課程暫行綱要 [Normal Senior High-school Curriculum Temporary Guidelines]. Taipei: Ministry of Education. MOE. (2006). 中華民國教育年報(94) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2005)]. Taipei. MOE. (2007). 中華民國教育年報(95) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2006)]. Taipei. MOE. (2008a). 中華民國教育年報(96) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2007)]. Taipei. MOE. (2008b). 普通高級中學課程綱要 [Senior High-school Curriculum Guidelines]. Ministry of Education. MOE. (2008c, January 24). 高中課程綱要總綱與23科綱要 [The General Guiding Principles of the High School History Curriculum Outline and]. MOE. (2008d, February 5). 教育部新聞稿-發布普通高級中學課程綱要 [MOE press release. Announcement of the High-school Curriculum Guidelines]. MOE. (2009). 中華民國教育年報(97) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2008)]. Taipei. MOE. (2010a). 中華民國教育年報(98) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2009)]. Taipei. MOE. (2010b, August 19). 公告：「普通高級中學歷史科課程綱要(草案)公聽會」於9月16~19日分區辦理 [Announcement: The public hearings for the Normal Senior High School History Curriculum Guidelines (Draft)” will be held September the 16-19th in the allocated areas]. Center for History Education. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://203.68.236.93/xoops2/modules/news/article.php?storyid=247 MOE. (2010c, September 13). 普通高級中學必修科目「歷史」課程綱要(草案) [101 Draft]. MOE. Retrieved from http://203.68.236.93/doc/news/990913.pdf MOE. (2011a). 中華民國教育年報(99) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2010)]. Taipei. MOE. (2011b, June 7). 正式公告課程綱要 [Official Curriculum Guidelines]. Retrieved from http://203.68.236.93/doc/95course/content/1000607-02.doc MOE. (2012). 中華民國教育年報(100) [Education Yearbook of the Republic of China (2011)]. Taipei. Moore, R. (2007). Sociology of Knowledge and Education (1st ed.). Continuum. Nora, P. (1989). Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations, (26), 7–24. doi:10.2307/2928520 Peng, Q. (2010, September 13). 史課綱爭議，教長：請尊重專業 [The High School History Curriculum Controversy, Minister of Education: Please respect professionalism]. China Times. Retrieved April 22, 2013, from http://news.chinatimes.com/politics/0,5244,11050202x132010091300663,00.html Petition. (2012, June 20). 我是民眾，我反對竄改歷史 [I am the people, I oppose the modification of history]. Campaign. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://campaign.tw-npo.org/sign.php?id=2012061809565300 Poole, R. (1999). Nation and Identity. Routledge Chapman & Hall. Popular Memory Group. (1998). Popular Memory: Theory, Politics, Method. In P. Robert & A. Thomson (Eds.), Oral History Reader (pp. 43–53). New York: Routledge. Potsdam Declaration. (1945, July 26). National Diet Library. Retrieved May 30, 2013, from http://www.ndl.go.jp/constitution/e/etc/c06.html Qiu, Y., & Lin, X. (2010, June 30). 教科書強銷統派史觀 綠委批洗腦 [The History Textbooks strongly advocate the historical perspective of the unification faction. Green Legislator accuses brain-whashing]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 15, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/jun/30/today-life11.htm Ran, R., & Zhuang, Z. (2010, March 28). 98課綱擬加重中國史 本土社團抗議-公視新聞網 [The 98 curriculum plan to increase the amount of Chinese history - Bentu Association protests]. 公視新聞網 [PTS News Network]. Retrieved February 23, 2013, from http://news.pts.org.tw/detail.php?NEENO=144273 Schneider, C. (2008). National Fortresses Besieged: History Textbooks in Contemporary Mainland China, Taiwan, and Japan. In S. Richter (Ed.), Contested Views of a Common Past: Revisions of History in Contemporary East Asia (pp. 245–270). Campus Verlag. Schudson, M. (1989). The Past in the Present versus the Present in the Past. Communication, 2, 105–113. Schwartz, B., & Kim, M. (Eds.). (2010). Northeast Asia’s Difficult Past: Essays in Collective Memory. Palgrave Macmillan. Shen, S.-C., & Wu, N. (2008). Ethnic and Civic Nationalism: Two Roads to the Formation of a Taiwanese Nation. In P. C. Y. Chow (Ed.), The “One China” Dilemma (pp. 117–143). New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Shi, Q. (2010, March 20). 台灣為主體的教育 [Education with Taiwan as the Main Part]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 20, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/mar/20/today-o10.htm Shi, W. (2010, March 11). 保守與倒退的九九 [Conservative and Backward-Looking 99]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 20, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/mar/11/today-o4.htm Shi, Y. (2004, December). 淺談中美建交公報 [Discussion of the Communique between China and the US for the establishment of diplomatic relations]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/168-5568.html Song, X. (2004). Between Civic and Ethnic: The Transformation of Taiwanese Nationalist Ideologies (1895-2000). Asp / Vubpress / Upa. Southern Taiwan Society. (2003, September 12). Focus the education system on Taiwan. Taipei Times. Retrieved March 7, 2013, from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2003/09/12/2003067553 Su, Y. (2012a, June 11). 馬求的歷史定位 現形 [The Status of history of Ma´s conviction becomes obvious]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/11/today-p4.htm Su, Y. (2012b, June 12). 教部成政治文宣打手 [The MOE becomes a hired thug for political propaganda]. Liberty Times. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/12/today-p5.htm Su, Y., & Hu, Q. (2012, June 12). 政治黑手 推ECFA、免簽入教科書 [Political Criminals push ECFA and the visa-exemption in the history textbooks]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/12/today-p4.htm Su, Y., & Lin, X. (2012a, June 11). 立委踢爆 馬政府要將高中歷史「去台灣化」[Legislator Exposes: The Ma Administration want to de-Taiwanize the High School Curriculum]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 8, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/11/today-t1.htm?Slots=Live Su, Y., & Lin, X. (2012b, June 11). 「民眾建議意見」下指導棋 審委不滿 [“Suggestions and Opinions from the Public” is giving directions. The Examination Committee is not pleased]. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jun/11/today-p2.htm Sun, S. (2010a, March). 真正的復辟派御用學者正在現形 [The true face of the real stick-in-the-mud´s that use scholars unveals itself]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/231-7823.html Sun, S. (2010b, August). 只有「台灣人民史觀」，而無「統獨史觀」[There is just a „Historical Perspective of the Taiwanese people“, and no „Unification or Independence Historical Perspective”]. HaixiaInfo. Retrieved May 15, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/236-7936.html Teacher. (2010, September 17). 一位高中歷史老師對新課綱草案的看法 [The opinion of a High School Teacher about the New Curriculum]. Retrieved from http://de.scribd.com/doc/37631193/%E4%B8%80%E4%BD%8D%E7%8F%BE%E5%A0%B4%E6%95%99%E5%AD%B8%E7%9A%84%E9%AB%98%E4%B8%AD%E8%80%81%E5%B8%AB%E7%9A%84%E4%BE%86%E4%BF%A1 Treaty of San Francisco. (1951, September 8). Taiwan Documents Project. Retrieved May 30, 2013, from http://www.taiwandocuments.org/sanfrancisco01.htm Vickers, E. (2007). Frontiers of Memory: Conflict, Imperialism, and Official Histories in the Formation of Post-Cold War Taiwan Identity. In S. M. Jager & R. Mitter (Eds.), Ruptured Histories: War, Memory, and the Post-Cold War in Asia (pp. 209–232). Harvard University Press. Vickers, E., & Jones, A. (2005). History Education and National Identity in East Asia. Routledge. Wang, F. (2005). Why Bother about School Textbooks?: An Analysis of the Origin of the Disputes over Renshi Taiwan Textbooks in 1997. In J. Makeham & A. -chi. Hsiau (Eds.), Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan: Bentuhua (First Edition., pp. 55–99). Palgrave Macmillan. Wang, X. (2010a, April). 有關歷史課綱，我也有話要說 [With regard to the history curriculum I also want to say something]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/232-7843.html Wang, X. (2010b, April). 站出來，保衛我們台灣人民的歷史 . 駁周碗窈和『98課綱』[Stand up, protect the history of us Taiwanese against Zhou Wanyao and the 98 curriculum]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/232-7831.html Wang, X. (2010c, May). 拜託，台灣「國史」請暫且存放一下吧！[Please, give up on the notion that Taiwanese history is national history!]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/233-7869.html Wang, X. (2010d, May). 堅決反對「皇民史觀」[Firmly opposed to the ‘Japanese historical perspective‘]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/233-7871.html Wang, X. (2010e, November). 撥亂反正乎，為德不卒乎. 評高中歷史教科書課程綱要修訂草案[Bringing order out of chaos started out with virtue but failed to carry things through. Comment on the revised Draft of the High School History Curriculum Guidelines]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 15, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/239.html Wang, X. (2012a, July). 馬英九切莫作歷史的罪人 [Ma Yingjiu you must not make history sinners]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 16, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/259.html Wang, X. (2012b, August). 撥亂反正，回歸憲法 [Bringing Order Out of Chaos, Return to the Constitution.]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 16, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/260-8517.html Wang, X., Wu, S., & Sun, Y. (2010). 甲案大綱 [Jia-draft Outline]. Google Docs. Retrieved June 6, 2013, from https://docs.google.com/file/d/0ByXtXmyiwurMZmExNmY2ZmMtYjQ4Mi00NDk4LWEzNWItZjQyZGFmNWU3OGVl/edit?hl=zh_TW Wang, & Xu, S. (2010, September 16). 臺灣史上溯三國 沒啥好怕的 [Taiwanese history goes back to the Three Kingdoms, There is nothing to be afraid of]. China Times. Retrieved March 2, 2013, from http://news.chinatimes.com/forum/0,5252,110514x112010091600434,00.html Wang, Zheng. (2008). National Humiliation, History Education, and the Politics of Historical Memory: Patriotic Education Campaign in China. International Studies Quarterly, 52(4), 783–806. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00526.x Wang, Zhongfu. (2003, November). 《高中歷史新課程綱要草案》何以如此荒謬 [How can there exist something as ridiculus as “The New High School History Curriculum Guidelines Draft”]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 20, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/155-288.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2004, December). 對《高中歷史課程綱要草案》的基本認識 [The Basic Understanding of the Senior High School History Curriculum Guidelines Draft]. haixiainfo. Retrieved April 18, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/SRM/168-5566.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2008a, May). 向馬英九建言 》消弭教育亂象的正本清源之道 [A letter to Ma Yingjiu: the radical way to erase the chaos of education]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/209-7185.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2008b, July). 台灣教育問題 》對於新任教育部長的期待與疑慮 [The problems of Taiwanese education: the doubts and expectations towards the new acting minister of education]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/211-7241.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2008c, September). 《高中歷史九八課綱》應全面檢討 重新擬定 [The “98 high-school history curriculum guidelines” reviewed in their entirety and formulated from scratch]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/213-7283.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2009a, March). 《高中歷史九八課綱》修訂成敗的關鍵 [The key for the success or failure of the revision of the „98 High School History Curriculum“]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/219-7463.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2009b, September). 國可亡，史不可亡 [A country can die, history does not die]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/225-7680.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2010a, April). 修訂中的高中歷史課綱「大復辟」了嗎？[Is the revsion of the high-school history curriculum guidelines a “big restauration”?]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/232-7844.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2010b, June). 具有「爭議性」史事不能列入歷史課綱？ [“Controversial” historical facts can not be included in the history curriculum?]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 11, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/234-7892.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2011, July). 論「高中歷史新課綱」的根本問題 [Discussion of the fundamental problems of the “New High School History Curriculum Guidelines”]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 16, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/247-8199.html Wang, Zhongfu. (2012, July). 高中歷史課程的修正能否寄望「12年國教」課綱 [Can the revised high school history curriculum place its hopes on the “12 year basic education” curriculum?]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 16, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/259-8502.html Whitehead, A. (2008). Memory. Routledge. Working Group. (2010, September 28). 請各位課綱委員饒了我們吧∥高中歷史老師的心聲 [Members of the Editorial Committee, please forgive us // The voice of the High School Teachers]. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from http://98history.blogspot.tw/2010/09/blog-post_23.html Wu, K. (2004, November 11). 人為改造的歷史傳不久[(Re-)constructed history won´t last long]. UnitedDailyNews. Retrieved April 19, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/news/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=4077 Wu, M. (2005, January). 由「高中歷史課程綱要」之爭論 [The controversy over the high-school history curriculum guidelines]. haixiainfo. Retrieved June 3, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/169-640.html Wu, Z. (2010, September 19). 高中歷史新課綱 為難師生 [The New High School History Curriculum becomes a Problem for Teachers and Students]. United Daily News. Retrieved March 3, 2013, from http://udn.com/NEWS/OPINION/X1/5857892.shtml Xie, D. (2012, July). 教科書「回歸憲法規範」也錯了嗎？[Is it also wrong that education is “returning to the regulations of the constitution”?]. haixiainfo. Retrieved May 16, 2013, from http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/259-8501.html Xu, R. (2010, September 19). 高中歷史新課綱公聽會 砲聲隆隆 [The Public Hearing for the New High School History Curriculum Guidelines: Rumbling]. United Daily News. Retrieved March 2, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/campus/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=272331 Xu, Z. (2004, November 24). 許倬雲-我對史學爭議的看法 [Xu Zhuoyun - My opinion about the history education controversy]. China Times. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://www.360doc.com/content/07/0624/22/24133_577978.shtml Xue, H. (2010, February 26). 高中「台灣史不縮水」 課綱共識 [Curriculum Consens: High School Taiwanese history will not shrink]. United Dayily News. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/campus/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=236899 Yan, G. (2012a, July 5). 兩岸/學者：歷史教科書改革不能只做半套 [Cross Strait/Scholars: The Reform of the High School History Textbooks can not only go half way]. cdnews. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.cdnews.com.tw/cdnews_site/docDetail.jsp?coluid=141&docid=101960717 Yan, G. (2012b, July 12). 教科書/馬:台獨化皇民化內容應刪除 [Textbooks / Ma: The Content that Contains Taiwanization and Japanization has to be erased]. CDnews. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.cdnews.com.tw/cdnews_site/docDetail.jsp?coluid=106&docid=101968429 Yan, W. (2010, September 16). 高中歷史課綱／東南亞史觀何去何從？公聽會激辯 [High School History Curriculum Guidelines / What path should be followed with regard to the history of SOE? Fierce debate at the public hearing]. United Dayily News. Retrieved April 22, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/campus/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=271836 Yang, M. (2004, November 10). 台灣反對黨譴責歷史教科書切割兩岸 [Taiwan´s opposition party denounces that the history textbooks cut both sides of the Taiwan Strait]. BBC. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/trad/hi/newsid_3990000/newsid_3998400/3998495.stm Yang, S. (2010a, February 28). 新政府高中歷史課綱的修訂是「向上提升」？抑或「往下沈淪」？[Is the revision of the high school history curriculum by the new government an improvement or a downgrading?]. 98高中歷史課綱. Retrieved from http://98history.blogspot.tw/2010/02/blog-post_4786.html Yang, S. (2010b, March 12). 救救高中生 [Save the high-school students]. Liberty Times. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/mar/12/today-o2.htm Yu, W. (2010, September 18). 高中歷史新課綱 缺世界觀 [The New High School History Curriculum Guidelines lack a Globalized Point of View]. United Dayily News. Retrieved April 22, 2013, from http://mag.udn.com/mag/campus/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=272211 Zeng, W. (2010, February 25). 走回頭路的歷史教育 [The history education is walking backwards]. 曾韋禎的部落格. Retrieved from http://blog.roodo.com/weichen/archives/11800163.html Zeng, W., & Guo, F. (2010, September 19). 高中歷史六冊/三冊都有中國史 高中老師憂心 [Three of six high school history books all contain Chinese history - High School Teachers worry]. 自由電子報 Liberty Times. Retrieved April 22, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/sep/19/today-life2.htm Zeng, W., & Lin, X. (2010a, February 25). 課綱修訂委員憂台灣危機／高中中國史 比重要加倍 [Curriculum guidelines revision committee members worried about a Taiwan crisis / The focus of high school history education will be on China]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/feb/25/today-t1.htm# Zeng, W., & Lin, X. (2010b, February 25). 歷史科重修一年 爭議多[History education has been revised for one year and causes many controversies]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/feb/25/today-life2-2.htm Zeng, W., & Lin, X. (2010c, February 28). 高中歷史課綱 中國史加半學期 [High School History Curriculum: Chinese History increased by a half semester]. Liberty Times. Retrieved February 19, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/feb/28/today-life8.htm Zhang, Q. (2004, November 15). 台灣地位未定論 列入高中歷史教材惹爭議 [The controversy over the inclusion of “the debate over Taiwan´s unresolved status” in the high school history teaching material]. New Taiwan. Retrieved May 18, 2013, from http://www.newtaiwan.com.tw/bulletinview.jsp?bulletinid=20233 Zhang, Yuan. (2003, September 20). 下一代更需要歷史知識 [The next generation needS historical knowledge even more]. China Review. Taipei. Zhang, Yuteng. (2010, March 27). 張譽騰：歷史感的窮困 [Zhang Yuteng: The wretched poverty of the sense of history]. 98history. Retrieved from http://98history.blogspot.tw/2010/03/blog-post_6478.html Zhou, L. (2010). 歷史的尊嚴和歷史的留白。談高中歷史教育及課程綱要 [The honor of history and the white spots of history. Discussing high school history education and curriculum guidelines]. Contemporary, 244, 42–54. Zhou, P. (2012, June 11). 高中歷史教科書難產 鄭麗君：張亞中是幕後黑手 [Difficult birth of the high-school history textbooks. Zheng Lijun: Zhang Yazhong is a criminal behind the scenes]. ETtoday. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from http://www.ettoday.net/news/20120611/56227.htm Zhou, W. (2010a). 改良還是改劣.評擴大中國史壓縮世界史的九九新高中歷史課綱 [Improvement or „Verschlimmbesserung“ (improvement for the worse)? Discussing the new 99 curriculum guidelines that enlarge Chinese history and compress world history]. 244, 55–64. Zhou, W. (2010b, February 8). 新政府撥亂反正？還是歷史教育大復辟？高中歷史課綱要改成怎樣，請大家來關心！[Does the new government bring order out of chaos? Or does history education reclaim its rightful place? Please everybody care how the high-school history curriculum should be revised!]. esouth. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://enews.url.com.tw/south/56491 Zhou, W. (2010c, March 9). 高中臺灣史教學散策 [The loosened policy of Taiwanese history teaching]. 98history. Retrieved from http://98history.blogspot.tw/2010/03/blog-post_09.html#more Zhou, W., Wang, W., Lin, G., & Lin, X. (2010). 丙案大綱 [Bing-draft Outline]. Google Docs. Retrieved June 6, 2013, from https://docs.google.com/file/d/0ByXtXmyiwurMMGQ5ZWQ0YmUtY2I3ZC00MzU4LTg2Y2UtMmJjYTk5MzNhZTNi/edit?hl=zh_TW Zhu, P. (2012, July 16). 當殖民者揮舞外來憲法 [A constitution designed by colonialists from outside]. Liberty Times. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/jul/16/today-o2.htm Zou, J. (2010, September 20). 自由電子報 - 《星期專訪》張炎憲︰馬政治指導歷史課綱 [Weekly Exclusive Interview: Zhang Yanxian: The Ma Administration guides the History Curriculum Guiedelines]. The Liberty Times. Retrieved April 22, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/sep/20/today-p5.htm 中日和約 [Treaty of Taipei]. (1952, April 28). Academia Historica. Retrieved May 30, 2013, from http://www.drnh.gov.tw/Content_Display.aspx?MenuKey=48 管碧玲、賴清德與社團赴教育部與吳清基討論高中歷史課程綱要 [DPP requests MOE to discuss the curriculum]. (2010). MOE. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrFEu3aRb0I&feature=youtube_gdata_player zh_TW
