1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Social Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 協力創新在公部門應用之研究：文建會推動文化創意產業發展政策為例
Collaborative innovation in the public sector: the case of the council for cultural affairs’ policies promoting cultural and creative industries
作者 彭俊亨
Peng, Chun Heng
貢獻者 蕭武桐
彭俊亨
Peng, Chun Heng
關鍵詞 公部門創新
協力創新
協力治理
文化創意產業
public sector innovation
collaborative innovation
collaborative governance
cultural and creative industries
日期 2010
上傳時間 3-Sep-2013 12:00:22 (UTC+8)
摘要 公共部門的組織運作相較於過去，正處在更為不穩定和動盪的環境之中，公部門必須提高其「創新」的能力以為因應，並由於治理網絡形式的顯現，也更加強調公部門創新的重要性。面對當前許多充滿高度複雜與棘手的公共問題，我們不僅需要公共創新的新途徑，同時也要為許多問題的解決方案提出必要的工具。無疑地，吾人必須關注如何透過治理網絡中行動者間的協力，即是公共管理者、民選官員、企業、非營利組織等行動者的協力，用以強化公共創新，因此，「協力創新」可以說是當前公部門創新的重要議題，同時也是公部門面對網絡治理亟欲尋求的新方法。簡言之，欲探究的「協力創新」，則是指以網絡為基礎的協力，促進治理過程中公部門的創新。
本研究主要聚焦在公共部門協力創新的理論與實務的討論，以下述兩個關鍵重點做為討論的主軸：一、重點是針對「公共部門的創新」，而非一般所談論的企業創新；二、著重於「跨部門間或網絡協力」的創新，並非單一組織內部的創新。研究問題包括：何謂是在公部門的協力創新？協力創新的過程需要具備哪些條件？網絡中的行動者如何透過協力過程以導引出創新？協力創新呈現的樣貌或結果為何？對文化行政機關而言，文化創意產業政策之推動，對文化行政官僚的協力創新經驗有何特殊性？協力創新的過程有何困難？如何克服這些障礙，以驅動協力創新？
儘管公部門透過跨部門、跨組織的協力創新研究還處在發展萌芽的階段。在實務上，公部門必須審時度勢，在協力過程中透過制度設計，與行動參與者進行有效溝通、建立信任，並證明展現其領導、協調和整合的能力。因此，本研究關注協力創新在公部門的應用，一方面提出整合自公部門創新、協力治理文獻而發展出來的理論架構，另一方面也針對文建會在推動文化創意產業政策運用協力創新的過程和經驗，進行質化的實證研究，以提供公部門有關協力創新應用之理論面與實務面相互印證的機會。
研究發現公部門創新必須致力於創造更多的公共價值；政治的推力、回應外部發展趨勢、核心職能外新增業務的壓力、尋求和匯集外部資源、創造有利創新的組織文化是公共組織內外環境中存在激發協力創新的驅動因素；而網絡治理的領導能力、多層次與橫向溝通平台、互惠的信任關係基礎、良性的創新循環等是影響協力創新過程的關鍵因素；公部門適當的制度設計有利於協力創新的發展；協力創新的多元價值結果亦呈現出不同的創新類型。最後，本研究也針對協力創新的實務應用、制度設計及組織運作、文化創意產業推動方面提出若干建議。
The importance of strengthening innovation in the operation and organization of the public sector is highlighted by both today`s increasingly variable environment and the emergence of governance networks. The many complex and wicked problems that are currently encountered in civil sector indicates a need not only to innovate, but also to come up with necessary tools for solving multiple problems. No doubt the primary focus should be on uniting efforts among actors in governance networks, namely civil sector managers, elected officials, businessmen, and non-profit administrators, in order to strengthen public sector innovation. For these reasons, collaborative innovation is an important topic in public sector innovation and an anxiously pursued new method as the public sector faces collaborative governance. Moreover, collaborative innovation is network-based collaboration that promotes innovation in the public sector governance process.

This study primarily focuses on theories of public sector collaborative innovation and discussions of actual practice in the field. The study revolves around two key points: a focus on public sector innovation as opposed to commonly discussed business innovation, and innovation in cross-sector collaboration or network-based collaboration as opposed to innovation within a single organization. Questions addressed in this study include: What is meant by public sector collaborative innovation? What are the prerequisites for collaborative innovation processes? How do actors within a network lead innovation through collaborative processes? What are the features or results of collaborative innovation processes? What special experiences have administrators of cultural bureaus had promoting cultural and creative industry policies with collaborative innovation? What difficulties are encountered during processes of collaborative innovation? How can these difficulties be overcome in order to spur collaborative innovation?

Research of cross-sector and transorganizational collaborative innovation in the public sector is still in its developmental stages. Each collaborative process must be assessed through system design to ensure effective communication and the establishment of trust, as well as to verify leadership, coordination and integration capabilities. Therefore, this study concerned with the application of collaborative innovation in the public sector first constructs its theoretical framework on extant literature in the fields of public sector innovation and collaborative governance, and secondly is directed at the Council for Cultural Affairs use of collaborative innovation in its policies that promote cultural and creative industries. This study employs qualitative empirical research to provide opportunities for mutually verifiable theoretical and practical collaborative innovation applications related to the public sector.


Results of this study suggest that innovation in the public sector should be directed at creating more public value. Governmental influence, response to external trends, pressure added by work extrinsic to core functions, the collection of external resources and organizational culture cultivating beneficial innovation are all factors that drive collaborative innovation in and around public organizations. Network governance leadership ability, forums for both horizontal and vertical communication, foundations of mutually beneficial trust, and healthy innovation cycles are all influential factors in collaborative innovation processes. Appropriate organizational design in the public sector spurs the development of collaborative innovation, and the manifold values of collaborative innovation result in different innovative forms. Finally, this study aims to make recommendations for the practical application, organizational design and operation of collaborative innovation, and the promotion of cultural and creative industries.
參考文獻 于國華，2006，《美感經驗的追尋－公民美學在台灣文化政策的軌跡》。文建會case網路學院編公民美學系列。台北：行政院文化建設委員會。
文化創意產業推動辦公室，2004，《2003年台灣文化創意產業發展年報》。台北：經濟部工業局。
------，2005，《2004年台灣文化創意產業發展年報》。台北：經濟部工業局。
------，2006，《2005年台灣文化創意產業發展年報》。台北：經濟部工業局。
------，2009，《2008年台灣文化創意產業發展年報》。台北：經濟部工業局。
文化環境工作室主編，2001，《台灣縣市文化藝術發展－理念與實務》。台北：文建會。
王季家，2007，《Web 2.0創新應用於政府線上服務之研究》。國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所碩士論文。
王俐容，2005，〈文化政策中的經濟論述：從菁英文化到文化經濟〉。《文化研究》，1，169-195。
王美音譯，Dorothy Leonard-Barton 原著，1998，《知識創新之泉》。臺北：遠流出版。
丘昌泰，2004，《公共政策》。台北市：巨流。
史美強、蔡武軒，2000，〈網絡社會與治理初探〉。《中國行政評論》，10（1）：33-74。
史美強，2005，《制度、網路與府際治理》。台北：元照。
行政院文化建設委員會，2008，《文化創意產業發展第二期計畫（97-100年）》。
------，2009，《文化創意產業發展（第二期）修正計畫（97-102年）》。
江大樹，2006，〈建構地方文官培訓藍海策略網絡治理觀點〉。《研習論壇》，72，1-21。
江震浩，2006，《文化公民權之賦權與實踐：以2006臺北電影節為例》。國立台北大學／公共行政暨政策學系碩士學位論文。
呂育誠，2006，〈網絡治理與治理網絡：政府變革的新課題〉。《臺灣民主季刊》，3(3)，207-212。
李仁芳，2006，〈文化創意產業的策略性發展政策〉，經濟部文化創意產業推動辦公室，《2005台灣文化創意產業發展年報》，頁282-287，台北：經濟部工業局。
李田樹、李芳齡譯，Gary Hamel 原著，2000，《啟動革命》。臺北：天下文化。
李芳齡譯，Vijay Govindarajan and Chris Trimble 原著，2006，《創新3力－策略性創新的致勝關鍵》。台北：天下文化。
李宗勳，2004，〈公私協力與委外的效應與價值：一項進行中的治理改造工程〉，《公共行政學報》12 期，頁41-77。
李明軒、邱美如合譯，Michael E. Portor 原著，2002，《競爭優勢》。臺北：天下文化。
李長晏，2007，〈都市治理與地方民主--都市民主協同治理模式概念設定〉。發表於中國政治學會年會暨「制度、治理與秩序」學術研討會，高雄市。
李長晏、潘競恒、林煥笙，2009，〈地方政府協力治理之理論與實務--以嘉義縣朴子溪環境污染整治計畫為例〉，發表於2009TASPA台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會-全球化心公共管理趨勢與挑戰--理論與實務學術研討會，高雄市。
李長晏、林煥笙，2009，〈中央與地方協力夥伴關係之分析—以台中縣潭子段旱溪整治工程為例〉，《公共行政學報》，第34期，頁49-100。
李政賢譯，C. Marshall & G. B.Rossman原著，2006，《質性研究：設計與計畫撰寫》。台北：五南。
宋學文，2007，〈全球治理下的國家價值領導〉。收錄於：吳英明等主編，《價值領導與管理：激發公部門生命力的理論與實務分享》，頁39-59。臺北：五南圖書。
邱坤良，2010，〈文創別喊過頭〉。2010.06.02《中國時報時論廣場》，網站：http://news.chinatimes.com/forum/0,5252,11051401x112010060200387,00.html(2010/06/02)
汪浩譯，Urich Beck原著，2004，《風險社會－通往另一個現代的路上》。台北：巨流。
林水波，2009，〈協力文化〉，《T & D飛訊》，第12期，2-13。
2007，〈協力領導〉，《T & D飛訊》，第2期，3-17。
林水波，2004，〈制度移植的策略性評估－以公投法為例〉，《國家政策季刊》，第3卷第1期，頁49-80。
林亦杰，2009，《地方文化產業治理機制評估研究：以貓空茶文化產業為例》。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文。
林志冠，1993，《我國文化行政組織體系變遷與發展之研究》。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文。
林美玲，2008，《自然人憑證政策創新及擴散之研究》。銘傳大學公共事務學系在職專班碩士論文。
林佩姍，2007，《公私協力下的夥伴關係--以華山文化創意園區為例》。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文。
周晏如，2006，《我國文化政策演變及定位認知之研究－藝術經費補助觀點》。台北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
吳定，2003，《政策管理》。台北：聯經出版社。
吳定，2006，《公共政策辭典》。台北：五南。
吳曜竹，2009，《資通訊政策規劃過程的創新採納》。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文。
高希均、李誠主編，2002，《知識經濟之路》。臺北：天下文化。
唐錦超譯，Everett M. Rogers 原著，2006，《創新的擴散》。臺北：遠流。
徐作聖、邱奕嘉合譯，Allan Afuah 原著（2000），《創新管理》。臺北：華泰文化。
孫本初審訂，2002，《治理、國家與政府》。台北：智勝文化出版社
孫本初等譯，B. Guy Peters原著，2000，《政府未來的治理模式》。台北：智勝文化出版社。
孫本初、鍾京佑，2005，〈治理理論之初探：政府、市場與社會治理架構〉。《公共行政學報》，16，107-135。
孫本初編著，2010《公共管理》(五版)。台北：智勝文化。
孫同文，2003，《從威權政府到民主治理－台灣公共行政理論與實務之變遷》。台北：元照出版。
孫華翔，2003，《文化與產業間的游移_九十年代台灣文化政策發展脈絡初探》。國立台北藝術大學傳統藝術研究所碩士論文。
張世杰、彭俊亨，2010a，〈公共創新的歷史制度論分析:理論分析架構的提出〉，發表於：第七屆地方治理與城鄉發展學術研討會。主辦單位：玄奘大學公共事務管理學系。新竹市：玄奘大學，2010年4月24日。
------------------，2010b，〈公共創新的歷史制度論分析：宜蘭國際童玩節的個案研究〉，發表於2010年臺灣政治學會年會暨「重新思考國家：五都之後，百年前夕！」學術研討會，台北：東吳大學，12月4-5日。
張晉瑄，2009，《文化創意產業治理之研究：以頑石創意與政府部門互動關係為個案》。台北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
張愛華，2004，〈企業創新管理對政府服務改造的啟示〉。收錄於：林嘉誠主編，《知識型政府》，頁279-305。臺北：行政院研考會。
張維倫等譯，2003，Throsby David原著。《文化經濟學》。台北：典藏出版。
張譽騰，2009，〈文化政策之規劃與推動〉。《研考雙月刊》，33(2)，121-129。
許育典，2006，《文化憲法與文化國》。台北：元照出版公司。
陳金貴，2011，〈社會企業家精神應用在非營利組織籌募資源的探討〉發表於「兩岸社會福利學術論壇:社會福利模式一從傳承到創新」。北京：中國社科院社會政法學部、財團法人中華文化社會福利基金會主辦。2011年4月16-18日。
陳金貴、馬群傑，2008，〈文化產業經濟與文化發展課題之分析與比較--以臺南市為例〉。《公共事務評論》，9（1），頁27-57。
陳其南，2006，《國族主義到文化公民－台灣文化政策初探》。台北：行政院文化建設委員會。
陳啟光、陳玉真、于長禧、蔡政和（2006）。〈政府機關之間為民服務創新作為擴散過程之探討〉。《品質學報》，第 13 卷第 3 期，頁 329-343。
陳向明，2002，社《會科學質的研究》，台北：五南。
陳昭靜，2005，《影響電子化政府線上資訊服務之因素探討－政策創新觀點》，世新大學行政管理學系碩士論文。
陳景霖，2007，《公私協力夥伴關係之治理模式—以花蓮縣豐田社區總體營造為例》。國立東華大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文。
陳恆鈞，2002，《治理互賴與政策執行》，台北：商鼎。
陳恒鈞、張國偉，2005，〈協力運作模型之初探〉，《法政學報》，第19期，頁41-80。
陳恒鈞、張國偉，2006，〈組織協力與組織績效研究：以雲林縣蔬菜產銷班為例〉，《公共行政學報》，第19期，頁1-54。
陳恒鈞，2008a，〈協力治理模式之初探〉。《T&Ｄ飛訊》，第6期，頁26-37。
陳恒鈞，2008b，〈協力網絡治理之優點與罩門〉。《研習論壇》月刊，第92期，頁40-54。
陳恒鈞，2009，〈參與治理是趨勢？或是迷思？〉。《文官制度季刊》，特刊，頁113-144。
陳敦源、張世杰，2010，〈公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭〉。《文官制度季刊》，2(3)，17-71。
陳欽春，2009，〈文化創意產業及其政策思維：台灣與韓國的比較〉，收錄於徐斯勤、陳德昇主編《文化創意產業、品牌與行銷策略：跨國比較與大陸市場發展》，27-52。台北：印刻出版社。
------，2010，〈當代新公共行政談些什麼？第三次明諾布魯克會議之內容分析〉，發表於2010TASPA台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會，桃園。
黃惠穗，2006，《促進我國文化創意產業發展-公私協力夥伴關係之應用》。東華大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文。
黃朝盟，2005，《公共組織策略規劃之研究：理論、執行與評估》。台北：韋伯文化。
黃榮護、葉益昌（2007），〈價值管理—落實價值領導的基礎〉。收錄於：吳英明等主編，《價值領導與管理：激發公部門生命力的理論與實務分享》，頁23-37。臺北：五南圖書。
黃東益，2004，〈全球治理下政府知識管理的新面向：府際政策學習〉。《國家政策研究季刊》，3(1)，135-153。
黃營杉、汪志堅編譯，Lerlinger, Fred N. and Howard B. Lee著，2002，《研究方法》。台北：華泰文化。
楊志誠，2010a，〈全球化的圖像〉。《文化越界》，1(4)，19-35。
2010b，〈新中華文化的「全球地方化」策略：華人文化創意園區的全球佈局〉，本文發表於「第四屆中華戰略文化論壇」，北京，人民大會堂，2010年9月18日。
溫肇東、許牧彥，2004，《創新機制在政府部門之應用》，行政院研考會委託研究案，編號RDEC-RES-092-006。臺北：行政院研考會。
溫肇東、許牧彥，2004，〈政府機關的創新機制應用〉，收錄於：林嘉誠主編，《知識型政府》，頁307-337。臺北：行政院研考會。
溫肇東，2009，〈韓國文化創意產業：發展思路與取向〉，收錄於徐斯勤、陳德昇主編《文化創意產業、品牌與行銷策略：跨國比較與大陸市場發展》，1-26。台北：印刻出版社。
敬義嘉，2009，《合作治理：再造公共服務的邏輯》。天津：天津人民出版社。
馮久玲，2002，《文化是好生意》。台北市：商周。
彭俊亨、吳政峰、王俊元，2010，〈政策擴散下的創新治理：台灣工藝研究發展中心之經驗與啟發〉。《國家與社會》，第八期，頁99-155。
項維欣，2009，《專案團隊內創意構想守門與創新績效關係之研究-以業界參與科專廠商為例》。政治大學科技管理研究所博士學位論文。
楊式昭，1999，〈光復後台灣重要文化政策之觀察1945-1994〉。《1901-2000台灣文化百年論文集I》，95-39，台北：國立歷史博物館。
廖俊松，2006，〈公私協力：重建區社區總體營造計畫之案例觀察〉。《社區發展季刊》115，324-334。
廖炯志，蕭武桐，2010，〈公部門辦理節慶活動─台北燈節個案分析〉。《策略評論》第10期，35-51。
臧惠平，1993，創新擴散模型在縣市政府業務電腦化之驗證。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
鄭美華，2001，《我國文化行政組織機制調整之研究》。政治大學公共行政研究所博士學位論文。
漢寶德，2009，〈當心，文化與產業兩失！〉，2009.11.29《中國時報時論廣場》，網站：http://www.npf.org.tw/post/1/6778(2009/12/01)
------，2010，〈我看文化創意產業法〉。《藝術家》，418，130-132。
趙永茂，2008，〈地方與區域治理發展的趨勢與挑戰〉。《研考雙月刊》，32(5)，3-15。
劉宜君，2004，《公部門知識管理之探討：理論與實務精析》。台北：韋伯文化。
劉真如譯，Frans Johansson原著，2004，《梅迪奇效應》。台北：商周出版。
劉美芝，2003，《第三部門在我國文化創意產業發展計畫中的角色研究》。台北大學公共行政暨政策研究所碩士學位論文。
劉坤億，2006，〈臺灣地方政府間發展夥伴關係之制度障礙與機會〉。《臺灣民主季刊》，3（3），頁1-34。
劉坤億，2002，〈地方政府治理機制的創新挑戰：市場治理模式的功能與限制〉。《法政學報》， 15，79-114。
劉坤億，2001，《英國政府治理模式變革之研究》。政治大學公共行政學系博士學位論文。
劉榆華，2008，《從政黨輪替看我國文化政策之演變（1996-2008）－以文化預算及公共建設為例》。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文。
劉淑瓊，2008，〈推倒「柏林圍牆」－論家庭暴力防治之網絡治理課題〉。《東吳社會工作學報》，19，1-35。
劉蘭劍，2010，《創新的發生－網絡關係特徵及其影響》。北京：科學出版社。
蔡允棟，2006，〈民主行政與網絡治理：「新治理」的理論探討及類型分析〉。《台灣政治學刊》，10(1)，163-209。
蔡軒軒，2002，《台北市文化政變遷：戰後到九○年代》。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文。
蔣淑貞、馮建三（譯），2006，T. Miller and G Yudice原著，《文化政策》。台北：巨流出版。
謝宗學等譯，Jon Pierre與B. Guy Peters原著，2002，《治理、政治與國家》。台北：智勝文化。
謝俊義，2007，《公共網絡管理：臺北市政府戶政業務跨機關服務傳遞協力合作網絡實證研究》。政治大學公共行政學系博土位論文。
蘇昭英，2001，《文化論述與文化政策：戰後台灣文化政策轉型的邏輯》。國立藝術學院傳統藝術研究所碩士論文。
蘇登呼，2000，《政府官僚組織內部創新傳佈之研究：以台北市戶政事務所與高雄市衛生局為例》。中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
蘇顯星，2001，《戰後台灣文化政策變遷歷程研究－歷史結構分析》。臺南師範學院鄉土文化研究所碩士論文。
蕭武桐、陳衍宏，2008，〈從新制度論的觀點探討文化創意產業的發展：以新竹玻璃產業為例〉，發表於「全球化下的文化傳承國際學術研討會」，政治大學外語學院跨文化研究中心主辦，2008年9月19日。
蕭瑞麟，2008，《不用數字的研究》，台北：培生教育出版。
Agranoff, R. and M. McGuire (2001). Big Questions in Public Network Management Research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11: 295-326.
_________(2003). Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Agranoff, R. (2007). Managing within Networks: Adding Value to Public Organizations. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Alberti, A. and G. Bertucci (2006). “Replicating Innovations in Governance: An Overview” In United Nations (Ed.), Innovations in Governance and Public Administration:Replicating What Works, pp 1-24. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs of United Nations.
Albury, D. (2005). Fostering innovation in public services. Public Money and Management. 25 January, pp 51 – 6.
Allison, G. T. Jr. (2000). “Public and Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike in All Unimportant Respects?” In Richard J. Stillman (ed) Public Administration: Concepts and Cases, 7th edition, pp. 283- 298. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin.
Altshuler, A. A. and R. D. Behn (eds.) (1997). Innovation in American Government: Challenges,Opportunities, and Dilemmas.Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Alexander, E. R. (1995). How Organizations Act Together: Interorganizational Coordination in Theory and Practice. Australia: Gordon and Breach.
Ansell, C. and A. Gash (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,18(4): 543-571.
Bartlett, Dean and Pauline Dibben (2002). Public Sector Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Case Studies from Local Government. Local Government Studies,28(4):107-121
Bason C. (2010). Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-creating for a better society. UK: The Policy Press.
Behn, R. D. (1997). “The Dilemmas fo Innovation in American Government” in Alan A. Altshuler and Robert D. Behn (eds.) Innovation in American Government: Challenges, Opportunities, and Dilemmas, pp. 3-37.Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Benington, J. (2000). The modernization and improvement of government and public services. Public Money and Management. 20: 2, pp 3 – 8.
Benington, J. (2005). From private choice to public value. Public Management and Policy Association Review, May, 6-10.
Benz, A. and Y. Papadopoulos (Eds.) (2006). Governance and Democracy, London: Routledge.
Berry, F. S. (1994). Innovation in Public Management: The Adoption of Strategic Planning. Public Administration Review, 54(4): 322-30.
Bertucci, G. (2006). Innovations in Governance and Public Administration: Replicating What Works. United Nations New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Bessant, J. (2005). Enabling Continuous and Discontinuous Innovation: Learning From the Private Sector. Public Money & Management, 25 (1): p35-42.
Bland, T. etal., (2010). Enhancing Public Sector Innovation: Examining the Network-Innovation Relationship. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, Volume 15(3), 2010, article 3.
Bloch, C. et al. (2009). Public Sector Innovation Index – A Diagnostic Tool for measuring innovative performance and capability in public sector organizations. Exploratory project commissioned by NESTA.
Bommert, B. (2010). Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. International Public Management Review. Volume 11. Issue 1, pp.15 – 33.
Borins, S. (1998). Innovating with Integrity, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Borins, S. (2000). Loose cannons and rule breakers, or enterprising leaders? Some evidence about innovative public managers. Public Administration Review 60(6): 498-507.
Borins, S. (2001). Innovation, success and failure in public management research: some methodological reflections. Public Management Review 3(1): 3-18.
Borins, S. (ed.) (2008). Innovations in Government: Research, Recognition, and Replication. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Bourgon, J. (2010). The history and future of nation-building? Building capacity for public results. International Review of Administrative Sciences. (76)2, June 2010.195-218.
Bowden, A. (2005). Knowledge for Free? Distributed Innovation as a Source of Learning. Public Policy and Administration, 20; 56-68.
Box, R. C. (1998). Citizen Governance: Leading American Communities into the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
——— (1999). Running Government Like a Business: Implications for Public Administration Theory and Practice. American Review of Public Administration 29(1): 19–43.
Bourgon, J.（2010）. The history and future of nation-building? Building capacity for public results. International Review of Administrative Sciences. （76）2 , June 2010.195-218.
Buen, J. (2006). Danish and Norwegian wind industry: The relationship between policy instruments, innovation and diffusion. Energy Policy, 34 (18): 3887-3897.
Buijs, J. (2007). Innovation Leaders Should Be Controlled Schizophrenics. Creativity and innovation management, 16 (2): 203-210.
Carlson, C. (2007). A Practical Guide To Collaborative Governance. Policy Consensus Initiative. www.policyconsensus.org.(2010/12/03)
Carter, L. and F. Belanger (2005). The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information systems journal, 15 (1): 5-25.
Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chesbrough, Henry (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press.
Chiles, T. H. and J. F. McMackin (1996). Integrating variable risk preferences, trust and transaction cost economics. Academy of Management Review, 21, 73-99.
Clark, J. et al. (2008). Innovation in the Public and Third Sectors. NESTA innovation index Working Paper.
Claver, E. et al. (1999). Public administration: From bureaucratic culture to citizen-oriented culture. International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 12 Iss: 5, pp.455 – 464
Coleman, J.S., E. Katz and H. Menzel (1966). Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. New York: Bobbs Merrill.
Commonwealth of Australia (1994). Creative Nation: Commonwealth Cultural Policy. Canberra: Department of Communications and the Arts.
Considine, M. and J. M. Lewis (2007). Innovation and Innovators Inside Government: From Institutions to Networks. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20 (4): 581–607.
Considine, M., J. Lewis and D. Alexander (2009). Networks, Innovation and Public Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Conway, S. (1995). Informal boundary-spanning communication in the innovation process. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 7(3): 327–342.
Cooper, T. L., T. A. Bryer and J. W. Meek (2008). From Collective Public Management to Collaborative Public Governance: Capacity Building for Sustainability, Minnowbrook III Conference, September 5-7, 2008.
Cummings, S. and A. van Zee (2005). Communities of Practice and Networks: Reviewing Two Perspectives on Social Learning. KM4D Journal, 1(1), 8-22.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555-590.
Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational Size and Innovation, Organization Studies,13, (3), 375-402.
Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational Complexity and Innovation: Developing and Testing Multiple Contingency Models. Management Science, 42, (5), 693-716.
Damanpour, F. and S. Gopalakrishnan (1998). Theories of Organizational Structure and Innovation Adoption: The Role of Environmental Change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, (1), 1-24.
Damanpour, F. and S. Gopalakrishnan (2001). The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 45-65.
Davis, Mike (2003). Building Innovative bureaucracies: Change, Structure, and the Science of Ideas. The Public Manager (Winter): 3-10.
Davidorff, Paul and T. A. Reiner (1962). A Choice Theory of Planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 28, 11-39.
deLeon, L. and R. Denhardt (2000). The Political Theory of Reinvention. Public Administration Review 60(2): 89–97.
Dente, B., Bobbio, L. and Spada, A. (2005). Government or governance of urban innovation?. DISP, 162, 1-22.
Denhardt, R. and J. V. Denhardt (2000). The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering. Public Administration Review 60(6): 549–59.
Downs, A. (1967). Inside Bureaucracy, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Edelenbos, J. and Erik-Hans Klijn. (2007). Trust in Complex Decision-Making Networks: A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration. Administration & Society http://aas.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/39/1/25（2010/11/04）
Edquist, C. and L. Hommen (1999). Systems of innovation: theory and policy for the demand side. Technology and Society, 21, 63-79.
Eggers, B. and, S. Singh (2009). The Public Innovators Playbook, Washington, DC: Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
Elgie, R. and, I. McMenamin（2005）. Credible Commitment, Political Uncertainty or Policy Complexity? Explaining Variations in the Independence of Non-majoritarian Institutions in France. British Journal of Political Science, 35(3):531-548.
Emerson, K. and P. Murchie （2010）. “Collaborative Governance and Climate Change: Opportunities for Public Administration.” In O’Leary, R. et al. （Eds.）, (2010). The Future of Public Administration Around The World: The Minnowbrook Perspective. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press, 141-153.
Esmark, A. (2007). Democratic Accountability and Network Governance: Problems and Potentials. In E. Sorensen, and J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of Democratic Governance (pp. 274-296). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Fagerberg, J., D. C. Mowery and R. R. Nelson (eds.) (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Feiock, R. C. (2004). Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Ferlie, E., L. Fitzgerald, M. Wood and C. Hawkins (2005). The nonspread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management Journal, 48 (1): 17–134.
Foxon, T.J., R. Gross, A. Chase et al. (2005). UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures. Energy policy, 33 (16): 2123-2137.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how It’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Frederickson, H. G.（1991）. Toward a Theory of the Public for Public Administration. Administration and Society 22, no. 4: 395-417.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
Fung, A. (2008). Citizen Participation In Government Innovations. In Borins, S. ed., Innovations in government – Research, Recognition and Replication.Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Garnham, N. (2001). Afterword: The Cultural Commodity and Cultural policy. In: S. Sewood, ed., The UK cultural sector: Profile and policy issue s. London: Policy Studies Institute, 445-458.
Gates, S. and J. Hill (1995). Democratic Accountability and Government Innovation in the Use of Nonprofit Organizations. Public Studies Review 14(1/2): 137-148.
Gloor, Peter A. (2005). Swarm Creativity: Competitive Advantage through Collaborative Innovation Networks, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldsmith, S. and W. Eggers (2004). Governing By Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gripsrud, J. (2000). Learning for Experience: Cultural Policies and Cultural Democracyin the 20th Century. European Journal of Cultural Policy , Vol.7, No.2: pp. 197-209.
Guba, Egon G. and Yvonna S. Lincoln (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hagedoorn, J. (1996). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Schumpeter revisited. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(3), 883-896.
Hall, Peter (1986). Governing the Economy: the Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hall, Peter (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275-269.
Hall, Peter and R.C.R. Taylor (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalism. Political Studies, 44(5):936-957.
Halvorsen, Thomas et al. (2005). “On the differences between public and private sector innovation”, Publin Report, D9.
Hartley, J. and M. Allison (2000). The role of leadership in modernisation and improvement of public services. Public Money and Management. April, pp 35 – 40.
Hartley, Jean (2005). Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present. Public Money & Management, 25(1): 27-34.
Hartley, John (2005). “Creative Industries.” In: J. Hartley, ed. Creative Industries. Oxford: Blackwell, 1-40.
Hartley, J. (2006). Innovation and its Contribution to Improvement: A Literature Review for Policy-makers, Policy Advisors, Managers and Academics, London: Department of Communities and Local Government.
Heclo, Hugh (1978). ‘Issue networks and the executive establishment’, in Anthony King (Ed.), The New American Political System, Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 87–124.
Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Hesmondhalgh, D. and A.C. Pratt (2005). Cultural Industries and Cultural Policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy 11(1): 1-13.
Hess, Michael and David Adams (2007). Innovation in Public Management: The role and Function of Community Kowledge. The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 12(1), 1-20.
Hill, C. and L. Lynn (2005). Is hierarchical governance in decline? Evidence from empirical research, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 15: 2, pp 173 – 95.
Himmelman, A. T. (1996). On the Theory and practice of Transformational Collaboration: From Social Service to Social Justice. In C. Huxham (Ed.), Creating Collaborative Advantage (pp.19-43). London: Sage Publications.
Hipp, C. and H. Grupp (2005). Innovation in the service sector: The demand for service-specific innovation measurement concepts and typologies. Research policy, 34 (4): 517-535.
Hood, Christopher (1991). A New Public Management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69(1), 1-19.
Huxham, C. (1993). Collaborative Capacity: An Intra Organizational Perspective on Collaborative Advantage. Public Money and Management 13(3): 9-21
Huxham, C. (1996). Collaboration and Collaborative Advantage. In Creating Collaborative Advantage, edited by Chris Huxham, 1- 18. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Huxham, C. (2000). The Challeng of Collaborative Governace. Public Management Review, 2(3): 337-358.
Huxham, C. and N. Beech (2003). Contrary prescriptions: Recognizing good practice tensions in management. Organization Studies, 24, 69-93.
Huxham, C. and S. Vangen (2005). Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. London: Routledge.
Irvin, R. and J. Stansbury (2004). Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is it Worth the Effort?. Public Administration Review 64(1): 55-65.
Jones, O., S. Conway and F. Steward (1998). Introduction: Social interaction and innovation networks. International Journal of Innovation Management (Special Issue), 2(2): 123–136.
Jones, O. and M. Beckinsale (1999). Analysing the Innovation Process: Networks,Micropolitics and Structural Change. Research Paper 9919. Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham. http://www.abs.aston.ac/UK/.(2010/08/26).
Jun, J. S.（Ed.）(2002). Rethinking Administrative Theory: The Challenge of New Centry. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Jung, Yong-duck, Daniel Mazmanian, and Shui-Yan Tang（Ed.）(2009). Collaborative Governance in the United States and Korea. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
Keast, R., Mandell, M., Brown, K. and G. Woolcock (2004). Network Structures: Working Differently and Changing Expectations. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 363-371.
Keast, R. and M. P. Mandell (2009). What is Collaboration? ARACY Advancing Collaboration Practice, pp.1-3. Canberra: Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth.
Kelman, Steven (1987). Making Public Policy: A Hopeful View of American Government. New York: Basic Books.
Kelman, S. (2005). Unleashing change: a study of organizational renewal in government. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Kelly, G., G. Mulgan and S. Muers (2002). Creating Public Value: An analytical framework for public service reform. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, UK.
Kersbergen, Kees van and Franz van Waarden (2004). Governance as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 143–171.
Kettl, D. F. (1993). Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets. Washington, D. C.: The Brookings Institution Press.
Kettl, D. F.（2002）. The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty- First Century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kettl, D. F. (2006). Managing Boundaries in American Administration: The Collaboration Imperative. Public Administration Review, 66(Special Issue): 10-19.
Kickert, Walter J. M., Klijn, Erik-Hans, and Joop Koppenjan (Eds.) (1997). Managing Complex Networks, London: Sage.
King, Cheryl S. and Camilla Stivers (Eds.) (1998). Government Is Us: Public Administration in an Anti-Government Era. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Kingdon, John W. (1995). Agendas, Alternative, and Public Policies, 2nd edition. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Klijn, E. H. (1997). Policy Networks: An Overview. In Kickert, Walter J. M., Erik-Hans Klijn and Johannes Franciscus Maria Koppenjan (Eds.), Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector, (pp.14-34). Calif.: Sage. Publications.
Klijn, Erik-Hans and Chris Skelcher (2007). Democracy and governance networks: Compatible or not? , Public Administration, 85(3), 587-608.
Klijn, Erik-Hans et al., (2010). The Impact of Network Management on Outcomes in Governance Networks. Public Administration. Vol. 88, No. 4, (1063–1082).
Koch, P. and J. Hauknes (2005). Innovation in the Public Sector, Oslo: Publin.
Koch et al. (2006). Innovation in the Public Sector: Summary and policy recommendations. Publin Report No. D24.
Koelble, T .A. (1995). The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology. Comparative Politics. 27(2):231-243.
Kooiman, J. and M. Van Vliet (1993). Governance and Public Management. In Managing Public Organizations (2nd edn.), edited by K. Eliassen & J. Kooiman. London: Sage.
Kooiman, J. (ed.) (1993). Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. Newbury Park, UK: Sage.
Kooiman, J. (ed.) (2003). Governing as Governance. London: Sage.
Kooiman, Jan (1993). Findings, speculations and recommendations. In Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, edited by J. Kooiman, pp. 249-262. Newbury Park, UK: Sage.
Kooiman, Jan (1993). Social-political governance: Introduction. In Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, edited by J. Kooiman, pp. 1-6. Newbury Park, UK: Sage.
Koppenjan, Joop and Erik-Hans Klijn (2004). Managing Uncertainties in Networks, London: Routledge.
Korteland, E. and V. Bekkers (2008). The diffusion of electronic service delivery innovations in Dutch E-policing: The case of digital warning systems. Public Management Review, 10 (1): 71 - 88.
Krasner, S .D. (1984). Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics. Comparative Politics Journal,16(2) :223-246.
Kingdon, John W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston: Little Brown.
Klijn, Erik-Hans and Joop Koppenjan (2000). Public management and policy networks: Foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Management, 2(2), 135-158.
Klijn, E.-H. (2008). Complexity Theory and Public Administration: What’s New? , Public Management Review 10(3): 229-317.
Landau, J. (1993). Organizational change and barriers to innovation: a case study in the italian public sector, Human Relations. 46: 12, pp 1411 – 29.
Lenihan, D., J. Milloy, G. Fox and T. Barber（2007）. Progressive Governance for Canadians: What You Need To Know. Ottawa: Public Policy Forum.
Light, P. (1998). Sustaining Innovation: Creating nonprofit and government organizations that innovate naturally. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Love, J. (1999). Patterns of Networking in the Innovation Process: A Comparative Study of the UK, Germany and Ireland. Research Paper 9913. Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham. http://www.abs.aston.ac/UK/.(2010/08/28).
Lundvall, B. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Press.
Luton, Larry S. (2010). Qualitative Research Approaches for Public Administration. NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Lynn, L. (1997). Innovation and the Public Interest: Insights from the Private Sector in Altchuler and R. Behn (Eds) Innovation in American Government, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Mack, W.R., D. Green and A. Vedlitz (2008). Innovation and Implementation in the Public Sector: An Examination of Public Entrepreneurship. Review of Policy Research, 25 (3): 233-252.
Mandell, Myrna (2008). Ways of Working: Civic Engagement Through Networks, in Kaifeng Yang and Erik Bergrud (Eds), Civic Engagement in a Network Society, Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, 65-84.
Mandell, P. M. (Ed.) (2001). Getting Results Through Collaboration: Networks and Networks Structures for Public Policy and Management. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Marinez-Moyano, I. J. (2006). Exploring the Dynamics of Collaboration in Interorganizational Settings, Ch. 4, in Schuman (Editor). Creating a Culture of Collaboration. Jossey-Bass. p. 83
Marquand, D. (2004). Decline of the Public Oxford: Polity Press.
Martin, J. (2000). Innovation Strategies in Australian Local Government: Occasional Paper 4, Melbourne, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. http://
www.ahuri.edu.au/global/docs/innov_localgov.pdf (2010/09/10).
Marsh, David and Rod Rhodes (Eds) (1992). Policy Networks in British Government, Oxford; Oxford University Press.
Mayntz, Renate (1993). Modernization and the logic of interorganizational networks, in John Child, Michel Crozier, and Renate Mayntz (Eds), Societal Change between Markets and Organization, Aldershot: Avebury, 3-18.
Meier, Kenneth J. and Laurence J. O`Toole, (2003). Public Management and Educational Performance: the Impact of Managerial Networking. Public Administration Review. 63(6), 689-699.
Milward, H. B. and K. G. Provan (2003). Managing the Hollow State: Collaborating and Contracting. Public Management Review, 5(1): 1-18.
Moore, Mark H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Moore, M. H., M. Sparrow and W. Spelman (1997). Innovation in Policing: from Production Line to Jobs Shops, in A. Altchuler and R. Behn (Eds), Innovation in American Government, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Moore, M. H. (2005). Break-through innovations and continuous improvement: two different models of innovative processes in the public sector. Public Money and Management. 25: January, pp 43 – 50.
Moore, M. H. and Jean Hartley (2008). Innovations in Governance. Public Management Review, 10(1): 3-20.
Moore, M. H. (2009). Networked Government. In Goldsmith, S. and Kettle, D. ( Eds.), Unlocking the Power of Networks: Keys to High-Performance Government. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Mulcahy, K. V. (2006). Cultural Policy: Definitions and Theoretical Approaches. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 35(4): 319-330.
Mulgan, Geoff and David Albury (2003). Innovations in the public sector. London: Cabinet Office.
Mulgan, G. (2006). God and Bad Power: The Ideals and Betrayals of Government. London, UK: Allen Lane.
Nambisan, Satish (2008). Transforming Government through Collaborative Innovation, Washington, DC: Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
National Audit Office (2006). Achieving Innovation in Central Government Organizations, London: The Stationery Office.
Nelson, R. (1993). National Systems of Innovation. Oxford, Blackwell.
NESTA (2011). Making the transition to collaborative innovation: Issues of readiness, trust and governance.
http://www.nesta.org.uk/library/documents/Collaborative_Innovation_Briefing.pdf（2011/06/01）.
Newman, J. (2001). Modernising Governance. New Labour, Policy and Society, London: Sage.
Newman, Janet , John Raine and Chris Skelcher (2001). Transforming Local Government: Innovation and Modernization. Public Money & Management (April-June): 61-68.
Nice, David C. (1994). Policy Innovation in State Government. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press. Nooteboom, Bart (2000). ‘Institutions and Forms of Co-ordination in Innovation System.’ Organization Studies,21(5): 915-939.
Niskanen, William A. (1987). Bureaucracy, in Charles K. Rowley (Ed.). Democracy and Public Choice, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
O’Connor, J. (1999). The definition of ‘cultural industries. Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester Institute for Popular Culture, Mimeo.
O’Dell, C. and C. J. Grayson (1998). If only we knew what we know. New York: The Free Press.
OECD (2004). Innovation in the Knowledge Economy：Implications for Education and Learning. OECD.
OECD (2009). Focus on Citizens- Public Engagement for Better Policy and Services. OECD.
O’Flynn, Janine and J. Wanna（Eds.）,（2008）.Collaborative Governance：A new era of public policy in Australia? Published by ANU E Press.
http://epress.anu.edu.au/anzsog/collab_gov/html/frames.php(2010/09/10)
O’Leary, Rosemary et al. (2006). Introduction to the Symposium on Collaborative Public Management. Public Administration Review, 66(special): 6-9.
O’Leary, R. and L. B. Bingham (2009). Surprising Findings, Paradoxes, and Thoughts on the Future of Collaborative Public Management Research. In R. O’Leary & L. B. Bingham (Eds.), The Collaborative Public Manager: New Ideas for the Twenty-first Century (pp. 255-269). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
O’Leary, Rosemary et al. （Eds.）, (2010). The Future of Public Administration Around The World: The Minnowbrook Perspective. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
Osborne, David and T. Gaebler (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
Osborne, S. P. and K. Brown (2005). Managing Change and Innovation in Public Service Organizations. London: Routledge.
Ospina, S. and A. Saz-Carranza (2010). Paradox and collaboration in network management. Administration & Society, 42(4), 404-440.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of lnstitutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (1997). Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1): 45-52.
O`Toole, L. and K. Meier (2004). Desperately Seeking Selznick: Cooptation and the Dark Side of Public Management in Networks. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 681-693.
Patel, Imraan (2006). Understanding Innovations and Best Practice. In United Nations (Ed.), Innovations in Governance and Public Administration: Replicating What Works, pp 25-39. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs of United Nations.
Perry, James L. and Ann Marie Thomson. (2004). Civic Service: What Difference Does It Make? Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Perri 6 et al. (2002). Towards Holistic Governance: The New Reform Agenda. New York: Palgrave.
Perry, J. and L. Wise (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service. Public Administration Review, 50(3): 367-73.
Peters, B. G. (1998). Managing horizontal government: the politics of coordination. Public Administration, 76(summer): 295-311.
Peters, B. Guy and Jon Pierre (2000). Is there a Governance Theory. Paper presented to Conference ‘International Political Science Association, Quebec City, August.
Peters, B. Guy and Jon Pierre (2001). Developments in Intergovernmental Relations: Towards Multi-level Governance. Policy and Politics, 29(2): 131-5.
Politt, C. (2007). Toward a New Public Administration Theory: Some Comments on Jocelyne Bourgon’s 5th Braibant lecture, International Review of Administrative Sciences 73(1): 37-41.
Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert (2004). Public Management Reforms, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Powell, W. W. (1998). Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries, California Management Review, 40, 3, pp. 228-240.
Powell, W., W. Koput and L. Smith-Doerr (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, (1),116-130.
Powell W. and P. DiMaggio (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Pratt, A.C.（2005）. Cultural industries and public policy: An oxymoron? International journal of cultural policy, 11(1) 31–44.
Provan, K. G. and B. Milward (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1-33.
Provan, K. G. et al. (2005). The Use of Network Analysis to Strengthen Community Partnerships. Public Administration Review, 65(5): 603-613.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics, 12, 664-683.
Rainey, Hal G. (1999). Using Comparisons of Public and Private Organizations to assess Innovative Attitudes Among Members of Organizations. Public Productivity & Management Review, 23(2):130-149.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies, 44(5): 652-667.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding Governance, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ring, P. S. and A. H. Van de Ven (1992). Structuring cooperative relations between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 483-498.
Roberts, N.C. and T. R. Bradley (1991, June). Stakeholder Collaboration and Innovation: A Study of Policy Initiation at the State Level. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 27 No.2, p. 212.
Orren, K. and S. Kowronek (1994). Beyond the Iconography of Order: Notes for a “New Institutionalism”, In L. C. Dodd and C. Jillson (Eds), The Dynamics of American Politics. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
(2003). Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
Røste, Rannveig (2005). Studies of innovation in the public sector: A theoretical framework, Publin Report, D16.
Røvik, Kjell A. (1992). Institutionaliserede standarder og multistandardorganisasjoner, Statsvetenskapelig Tidsskrift, 8(4), 261-284.
Sabatier, Paul A. (1988). Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process. Political Science and Politics, 24(2), 147-156.
Sabatier, Paul A. (Ed.) (1999). Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder. Colorado: Westview Press.
Salamon, L. M. (2002). The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action: An Introduction. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.). The Tools of Government :A Guide to the New Governance (pp.1-47). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sanderson, I., T. Bovaird, P. Davis, S. Martin and A. Foreman (1998). Made To Measure: Evaluation in Practice in Local Government, London: Local Government Management Board.
Schneider, M., P. Teske and M. Mintron (1995). Public Entrepreneurs: Agents for Change in American Government. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Scharpf, Fritz W. (1994). Games real actors could play: Positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(1), 27-53.
Scharpf, Fritz W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership 3rd ed. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
Schumpeter, Joseph (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, Joseph (1946). Economic Theory and Entrepreneurial History – Change and the Entrepreneur, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Selsky, J. W. and B. Parker (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31, 6, 849-873.
Shao, Y., S. Chen and B. Cheng (2008). Analyses of the Dynamic Factors of Cluster Innovation - A Case Study of Chengdu Furniture Industrial Cluster. International Management Review, 4(1), 51-60.
Sifry, Micah L. (2009). “Lessons from America”. In Reboot Britain. NESTA.
Sim, E. W., A. Griffin, R. L. Price and B. A. Vojak (2007). Exploring Differences between Inventors, Champions, Implementers and Innovators in Creating and Developing New Products in Large, Mature Firms. Creativity and innovation management, 16 (4): 422-436.
Singlaub, K. (2008). Innovation in Public Management: What the Future Will Demand of Us. Public Management, 90 (6): 8-14.
Sirianni, Carmen (2009). Investing in Democracy: Engaging citizens in collaborative governance. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Skelcher, C. K. (2005). Public-private Partnerships and Hybridity in E. Ferlie, L. Lynn and C. Pollitt (Eds) Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 347 – 70.
Skelcher, C. and J. Torfing (2010). Improving democratic governance through institutional design: Civic participation and democratic ownership in Europe, Regulation and Governance, forthcoming.
Soni, Vidu (2005). “Local Government Innovations in American Cities.” In Amita Singh (ed.) Administrative Reforms: Towards Sustainable Practices, pp.117-143. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Sørensen, Eva and J. Torfing (2007). Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sørensen, Eva and J. Torfing (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234-258.
Sørensen, Eva and J. Torfing (2010). Studies in Collaborative Innovation. working paper. Retrieved July 6, 2010, from http://www.ruc.dk/en/departments/department-of-society-and-globalisation/forskningen/samarbejde/clips/biblioteket .
Spence, Muneera U. (2005) Graphic Design Collaborative Processes: a Course in Collaboration. Oregon State University. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: AIGA, 2005.
Retrieved May 31, 2010 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaboration
Stoker, G. (2006). Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1): 41-57.
Sullivan, H., and C. Skelcher (2002). Working across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Subramanian, A. and S. Nilakanta (1996). Organizational Innovativeness: Exploring the Relationship Between Organizational Determinants of Innovation, Types of Innovations, and Measures of Organizational Performance. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 24, (6), 631-647.
Swan, J. and H. Scarbrough (2005). The Politics of Networked Innovation. Human Relations,58(7), 913-943.
Swan, J., H. Scarbrough and M.Robertson (2002). The construction of ‘communities of practice’ in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477-496.
Tang, H. K. (1998). An integrative model of innovation in organizations. Technovation, 18(5), 297-309.
Termeer, C.J.A.M., H. Wesseling and S. Zouridis (2005). De knop om: innovatie in de publieke sector (Switching the knob: innovation in the public sector). Bestuurskunde (Public Administration), 7/8: 9-12.
Terry, Larry D. (1998). Administrative Leadership, Neo-Managerialism, and the Public Management Movement. Public Administration Review 58(3): 194–200.
Thelen, K. and S. Steinmo (1992). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics, In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen and F. Longstreth (Eds), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, pp.1-32. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tidd, Joe, John Bessant and Keith Pavitt (2001). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. 2nd Edition. Chichester,West Sussex: JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd.
Tidd, J., J. Bessant and K. Pavitt (2005). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 3rd edn., Chichester: Wiley.
Thompson, V. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10, 1-20.
Thomson, A. and J. Perry (2006). Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box. Public
Administration Review (Special Issue), 20-32.
Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2008). Modelling the cultural industries. International journal of cultural policy, 14(3) 217–232.
Tolbert, C. J., K. Mossberger and R. McNeal (2008). Institutions, Policy Innovation, and E-Government in the American States. Public Administration Review, 68 (3): 549-563. UNESCO (2003). Culture, Trade and Globalization. [online] http://www.unesco.org/culture/industries/trade/index.shtml ( 2009/11/7 )
Utterback, J. (1996). Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Van de Ven, A. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science. 32, pp 590 – 607.
Van de Ven, A. H. et. al (1999). The Innovation Journey. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Valente, T. W. (1995). Network Models of the Diffussion of Innovations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Vigoda-Gadot, E., A. Shoham, N. Schwabsky and A. Ruvio (2008). Public sector innovation for Europe: a multinational eight-country exploration of citizens’ perspectives. Public Administration, 86 (2): 307–329.
Voß, J.P. (2007). Innovation processes in governance: the development of `emissions trading` as a new policy instrument. Science and Public Policy, 34 (5): 329-343.
Von Hippel, Eric (1988). The Sources of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walker, R., E. Jeanes and R. Rowlands (2002). Measuring innovation: applying the literature-based innovation output indicator to public services. Public Administration. 80, pp 201 – 14.
Walker, Richard M. (2003). Evidence on the Management of Public Services Innovation. Public Money & Management (April): 93-102.
Walker, Richard M. (2006). Innovation Type and Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis of Local Government. Public Administration, 84(2):311-335.
Wanna, John (2008). Collaborative government: meanings, dimensions, drivers and outcomes. in O’Flynn, Janine and John Wanna（Eds.）, Collaborative Governance：A new era of public policy in Australia? Published by ANU E Press.http://epress.anu.edu.au/anzsog/collab_gov/html/frames.php (2010/09/10)
Warford, M. K. (2005). Testing a Diffusion of Innovations in Education Model (DIEM). The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 10 (3): 1-41.
Warren, Mark E. (2009). Governance-Driven Democratization. Critical Policy Analysis, 3(1), 3-13.
Weber, E. P. and A. Khademian (2008). Wicked Problem, knowledge Challenges, and Collaborative Capacity Builder in Network Settings. Public Administration Review, Mar/Apr, 68(2): 334-349.
Weir, Margret (1992). Ideas and the Politics of Bounded Innovation. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen and F. Longstreth (Eds), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, pp.188-216. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Weiss, E. S., R. M. Anderson and R.D. Lasker （2002）. Making the Most of Collaboration: Exploring the Relationship Between Partnership Synergy and Partnership Functioning. Health Education & Behavior, 29(6), 683-698.
Wildavsky, A. (1973). If planning is everything, maybe it’s nothing. Policy Sciences, Volume 4, no. 2, pp. 127-153.
Windrum, P. (2008). Innovation and Entrepreneurship In Public Services. In Innovation in Public Sector Services – Entrepreneurship, Creativity and Management, edited by P. Windrum and P. Koch. Cheltenham, UK; Northhampton, USA: Edward Elgar.
Wirick, David W. (2009). Public-Sector Project Management: Meeting the Challenges and Achieving Results. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Wise, Lois R. (1999). The Use of innovative Practices in the Public and Private Sectors: The Role of Organizational and Individual Factors. Public Productivity & Management Review,23 (1):1 50-168.
Wolfe, R. (1994). Organizational innovation: review, critique, and suggested research directions, Journal of Management Studies. 31, pp 405 – 31.
描述 博士
國立政治大學
公共行政研究所
91256504
99
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0912565041
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蕭武桐zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 彭俊亨zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Peng, Chun Hengen_US
dc.creator (作者) 彭俊亨zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Peng, Chun Hengen_US
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 3-Sep-2013 12:00:22 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 3-Sep-2013 12:00:22 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Sep-2013 12:00:22 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0912565041en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59685-
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 公共行政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91256504zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 公共部門的組織運作相較於過去，正處在更為不穩定和動盪的環境之中，公部門必須提高其「創新」的能力以為因應，並由於治理網絡形式的顯現，也更加強調公部門創新的重要性。面對當前許多充滿高度複雜與棘手的公共問題，我們不僅需要公共創新的新途徑，同時也要為許多問題的解決方案提出必要的工具。無疑地，吾人必須關注如何透過治理網絡中行動者間的協力，即是公共管理者、民選官員、企業、非營利組織等行動者的協力，用以強化公共創新，因此，「協力創新」可以說是當前公部門創新的重要議題，同時也是公部門面對網絡治理亟欲尋求的新方法。簡言之，欲探究的「協力創新」，則是指以網絡為基礎的協力，促進治理過程中公部門的創新。
本研究主要聚焦在公共部門協力創新的理論與實務的討論，以下述兩個關鍵重點做為討論的主軸：一、重點是針對「公共部門的創新」，而非一般所談論的企業創新；二、著重於「跨部門間或網絡協力」的創新，並非單一組織內部的創新。研究問題包括：何謂是在公部門的協力創新？協力創新的過程需要具備哪些條件？網絡中的行動者如何透過協力過程以導引出創新？協力創新呈現的樣貌或結果為何？對文化行政機關而言，文化創意產業政策之推動，對文化行政官僚的協力創新經驗有何特殊性？協力創新的過程有何困難？如何克服這些障礙，以驅動協力創新？
儘管公部門透過跨部門、跨組織的協力創新研究還處在發展萌芽的階段。在實務上，公部門必須審時度勢，在協力過程中透過制度設計，與行動參與者進行有效溝通、建立信任，並證明展現其領導、協調和整合的能力。因此，本研究關注協力創新在公部門的應用，一方面提出整合自公部門創新、協力治理文獻而發展出來的理論架構，另一方面也針對文建會在推動文化創意產業政策運用協力創新的過程和經驗，進行質化的實證研究，以提供公部門有關協力創新應用之理論面與實務面相互印證的機會。
研究發現公部門創新必須致力於創造更多的公共價值；政治的推力、回應外部發展趨勢、核心職能外新增業務的壓力、尋求和匯集外部資源、創造有利創新的組織文化是公共組織內外環境中存在激發協力創新的驅動因素；而網絡治理的領導能力、多層次與橫向溝通平台、互惠的信任關係基礎、良性的創新循環等是影響協力創新過程的關鍵因素；公部門適當的制度設計有利於協力創新的發展；協力創新的多元價值結果亦呈現出不同的創新類型。最後，本研究也針對協力創新的實務應用、制度設計及組織運作、文化創意產業推動方面提出若干建議。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The importance of strengthening innovation in the operation and organization of the public sector is highlighted by both today`s increasingly variable environment and the emergence of governance networks. The many complex and wicked problems that are currently encountered in civil sector indicates a need not only to innovate, but also to come up with necessary tools for solving multiple problems. No doubt the primary focus should be on uniting efforts among actors in governance networks, namely civil sector managers, elected officials, businessmen, and non-profit administrators, in order to strengthen public sector innovation. For these reasons, collaborative innovation is an important topic in public sector innovation and an anxiously pursued new method as the public sector faces collaborative governance. Moreover, collaborative innovation is network-based collaboration that promotes innovation in the public sector governance process.

This study primarily focuses on theories of public sector collaborative innovation and discussions of actual practice in the field. The study revolves around two key points: a focus on public sector innovation as opposed to commonly discussed business innovation, and innovation in cross-sector collaboration or network-based collaboration as opposed to innovation within a single organization. Questions addressed in this study include: What is meant by public sector collaborative innovation? What are the prerequisites for collaborative innovation processes? How do actors within a network lead innovation through collaborative processes? What are the features or results of collaborative innovation processes? What special experiences have administrators of cultural bureaus had promoting cultural and creative industry policies with collaborative innovation? What difficulties are encountered during processes of collaborative innovation? How can these difficulties be overcome in order to spur collaborative innovation?

Research of cross-sector and transorganizational collaborative innovation in the public sector is still in its developmental stages. Each collaborative process must be assessed through system design to ensure effective communication and the establishment of trust, as well as to verify leadership, coordination and integration capabilities. Therefore, this study concerned with the application of collaborative innovation in the public sector first constructs its theoretical framework on extant literature in the fields of public sector innovation and collaborative governance, and secondly is directed at the Council for Cultural Affairs use of collaborative innovation in its policies that promote cultural and creative industries. This study employs qualitative empirical research to provide opportunities for mutually verifiable theoretical and practical collaborative innovation applications related to the public sector.


Results of this study suggest that innovation in the public sector should be directed at creating more public value. Governmental influence, response to external trends, pressure added by work extrinsic to core functions, the collection of external resources and organizational culture cultivating beneficial innovation are all factors that drive collaborative innovation in and around public organizations. Network governance leadership ability, forums for both horizontal and vertical communication, foundations of mutually beneficial trust, and healthy innovation cycles are all influential factors in collaborative innovation processes. Appropriate organizational design in the public sector spurs the development of collaborative innovation, and the manifold values of collaborative innovation result in different innovative forms. Finally, this study aims to make recommendations for the practical application, organizational design and operation of collaborative innovation, and the promotion of cultural and creative industries.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章　緒論…………………………………………………1
第一節 研究背景與動機…………………………………1
第二節 研究目的與問題…………………………………10
第三節 研究方法與流程…………………………………13
第四節 研究範圍與限制…………………………………15
第二章　理論與文獻回顧………………………………… 18
第一節 公部門創新概念的探究…………………………18
第二節 網絡治理與公部門創新…………………………38
第三節 在公部門的協力創新……………………………64
第四節 文化政策與文化產業……………………………90
第三章 研究設計與實施…………………………………97
第一節 研究分析架構……………………………………97
第二節 資料蒐集的方法與工具…………………………103
第三節 樣本的選取…………..…………………………105
第四節 深度訪談之執行…………………………………107
第五節 文化創意產業發展政策個案析論………………112
第四章 研究分析與討論…………………………………120
第一節 公私部門協力創新的原動力……………………120
第二節 協力創新過程的內涵……………………………130
第三節 促進協力創新的制度設計………………………147
第四節 協力創新的過程結果……………………………156
第五節 小結：文化創意產業對文化政策的影響………165
第五章 結論………………………………………………172
第一節 發現………………………………………………172
第二節 建議………………………………………………183
第三節 未來研究方向……………………………………189
參考書目……………………………………………………192
附錄一文化創意產業發展法…………………………………224

圖 目 次

圖1-4 研究流程………………………………………15
圖2-1 創新的定義……………………………………24
圖2-2 Ansell & Gash的協力治理模型…………63
圖2-3 政府創新的來源……………………………67
圖2-4 創新循環……………………………………69
圖2-5 創新策略續圖………………………………70
圖2-6 政府在協力創新的角色……………………76
圖3-1 公部門協力創新的理論邏輯………………98
圖3-2 公部門應用協力創新的分析架構…………100
圖3-3 文創產業涵蓋範疇與目的事業主管機關…………………………116
圖3-4 我國文化創意產業發展推動策略架構……………………………118
圖4-1 文建會推動文化創意產業政策與創新導向關係…………………159


表 目 次

表1-1 文化創意產業之國際比較…………………………………………6
表2-1 美國政府獎的指標…………………………………………………21
表2-2 公私部門創新的差異………………………………………………26
表2-3 公共治理典範之比較………………………………………………42
表2-4 公共創新典範之比較………………………………………………43
表2-5 協力形式與治理方式………………………………………………56
表2-6 協力治理的重要面向………………………………………………60
表2-7 協力創新的能力……………………………………………………81
表3-1 受訪者一覽表………………………………………………………106
表3-2 戰後台灣文化政策的發展脈絡……………………………………113		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 303009 bytes-
dc.format.extent 156534 bytes-
dc.format.extent 4303956 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0912565041en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公部門創新zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 協力創新zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 協力治理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 文化創意產業zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) public sector innovationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) collaborative innovationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) collaborative governanceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) cultural and creative industriesen_US
dc.title (題名) 協力創新在公部門應用之研究：文建會推動文化創意產業發展政策為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Collaborative innovation in the public sector: the case of the council for cultural affairs’ policies promoting cultural and creative industriesen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 于國華，2006，《美感經驗的追尋－公民美學在台灣文化政策的軌跡》。文建會case網路學院編公民美學系列。台北：行政院文化建設委員會。
文化創意產業推動辦公室，2004，《2003年台灣文化創意產業發展年報》。台北：經濟部工業局。
------，2005，《2004年台灣文化創意產業發展年報》。台北：經濟部工業局。
------，2006，《2005年台灣文化創意產業發展年報》。台北：經濟部工業局。
------，2009，《2008年台灣文化創意產業發展年報》。台北：經濟部工業局。
文化環境工作室主編，2001，《台灣縣市文化藝術發展－理念與實務》。台北：文建會。
王季家，2007，《Web 2.0創新應用於政府線上服務之研究》。國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所碩士論文。
王俐容，2005，〈文化政策中的經濟論述：從菁英文化到文化經濟〉。《文化研究》，1，169-195。
王美音譯，Dorothy Leonard-Barton 原著，1998，《知識創新之泉》。臺北：遠流出版。
丘昌泰，2004，《公共政策》。台北市：巨流。
史美強、蔡武軒，2000，〈網絡社會與治理初探〉。《中國行政評論》，10（1）：33-74。
史美強，2005，《制度、網路與府際治理》。台北：元照。
行政院文化建設委員會，2008，《文化創意產業發展第二期計畫（97-100年）》。
------，2009，《文化創意產業發展（第二期）修正計畫（97-102年）》。
江大樹，2006，〈建構地方文官培訓藍海策略網絡治理觀點〉。《研習論壇》，72，1-21。
江震浩，2006，《文化公民權之賦權與實踐：以2006臺北電影節為例》。國立台北大學／公共行政暨政策學系碩士學位論文。
呂育誠，2006，〈網絡治理與治理網絡：政府變革的新課題〉。《臺灣民主季刊》，3(3)，207-212。
李仁芳，2006，〈文化創意產業的策略性發展政策〉，經濟部文化創意產業推動辦公室，《2005台灣文化創意產業發展年報》，頁282-287，台北：經濟部工業局。
李田樹、李芳齡譯，Gary Hamel 原著，2000，《啟動革命》。臺北：天下文化。
李芳齡譯，Vijay Govindarajan and Chris Trimble 原著，2006，《創新3力－策略性創新的致勝關鍵》。台北：天下文化。
李宗勳，2004，〈公私協力與委外的效應與價值：一項進行中的治理改造工程〉，《公共行政學報》12 期，頁41-77。
李明軒、邱美如合譯，Michael E. Portor 原著，2002，《競爭優勢》。臺北：天下文化。
李長晏，2007，〈都市治理與地方民主--都市民主協同治理模式概念設定〉。發表於中國政治學會年會暨「制度、治理與秩序」學術研討會，高雄市。
李長晏、潘競恒、林煥笙，2009，〈地方政府協力治理之理論與實務--以嘉義縣朴子溪環境污染整治計畫為例〉，發表於2009TASPA台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會-全球化心公共管理趨勢與挑戰--理論與實務學術研討會，高雄市。
李長晏、林煥笙，2009，〈中央與地方協力夥伴關係之分析—以台中縣潭子段旱溪整治工程為例〉，《公共行政學報》，第34期，頁49-100。
李政賢譯，C. Marshall & G. B.Rossman原著，2006，《質性研究：設計與計畫撰寫》。台北：五南。
宋學文，2007，〈全球治理下的國家價值領導〉。收錄於：吳英明等主編，《價值領導與管理：激發公部門生命力的理論與實務分享》，頁39-59。臺北：五南圖書。
邱坤良，2010，〈文創別喊過頭〉。2010.06.02《中國時報時論廣場》，網站：http://news.chinatimes.com/forum/0,5252,11051401x112010060200387,00.html(2010/06/02)
汪浩譯，Urich Beck原著，2004，《風險社會－通往另一個現代的路上》。台北：巨流。
林水波，2009，〈協力文化〉，《T & D飛訊》，第12期，2-13。
2007，〈協力領導〉，《T & D飛訊》，第2期，3-17。
林水波，2004，〈制度移植的策略性評估－以公投法為例〉，《國家政策季刊》，第3卷第1期，頁49-80。
林亦杰，2009，《地方文化產業治理機制評估研究：以貓空茶文化產業為例》。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文。
林志冠，1993，《我國文化行政組織體系變遷與發展之研究》。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文。
林美玲，2008，《自然人憑證政策創新及擴散之研究》。銘傳大學公共事務學系在職專班碩士論文。
林佩姍，2007，《公私協力下的夥伴關係--以華山文化創意園區為例》。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文。
周晏如，2006，《我國文化政策演變及定位認知之研究－藝術經費補助觀點》。台北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
吳定，2003，《政策管理》。台北：聯經出版社。
吳定，2006，《公共政策辭典》。台北：五南。
吳曜竹，2009，《資通訊政策規劃過程的創新採納》。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文。
高希均、李誠主編，2002，《知識經濟之路》。臺北：天下文化。
唐錦超譯，Everett M. Rogers 原著，2006，《創新的擴散》。臺北：遠流。
徐作聖、邱奕嘉合譯，Allan Afuah 原著（2000），《創新管理》。臺北：華泰文化。
孫本初審訂，2002，《治理、國家與政府》。台北：智勝文化出版社
孫本初等譯，B. Guy Peters原著，2000，《政府未來的治理模式》。台北：智勝文化出版社。
孫本初、鍾京佑，2005，〈治理理論之初探：政府、市場與社會治理架構〉。《公共行政學報》，16，107-135。
孫本初編著，2010《公共管理》(五版)。台北：智勝文化。
孫同文，2003，《從威權政府到民主治理－台灣公共行政理論與實務之變遷》。台北：元照出版。
孫華翔，2003，《文化與產業間的游移_九十年代台灣文化政策發展脈絡初探》。國立台北藝術大學傳統藝術研究所碩士論文。
張世杰、彭俊亨，2010a，〈公共創新的歷史制度論分析:理論分析架構的提出〉，發表於：第七屆地方治理與城鄉發展學術研討會。主辦單位：玄奘大學公共事務管理學系。新竹市：玄奘大學，2010年4月24日。
------------------，2010b，〈公共創新的歷史制度論分析：宜蘭國際童玩節的個案研究〉，發表於2010年臺灣政治學會年會暨「重新思考國家：五都之後，百年前夕！」學術研討會，台北：東吳大學，12月4-5日。
張晉瑄，2009，《文化創意產業治理之研究：以頑石創意與政府部門互動關係為個案》。台北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
張愛華，2004，〈企業創新管理對政府服務改造的啟示〉。收錄於：林嘉誠主編，《知識型政府》，頁279-305。臺北：行政院研考會。
張維倫等譯，2003，Throsby David原著。《文化經濟學》。台北：典藏出版。
張譽騰，2009，〈文化政策之規劃與推動〉。《研考雙月刊》，33(2)，121-129。
許育典，2006，《文化憲法與文化國》。台北：元照出版公司。
陳金貴，2011，〈社會企業家精神應用在非營利組織籌募資源的探討〉發表於「兩岸社會福利學術論壇:社會福利模式一從傳承到創新」。北京：中國社科院社會政法學部、財團法人中華文化社會福利基金會主辦。2011年4月16-18日。
陳金貴、馬群傑，2008，〈文化產業經濟與文化發展課題之分析與比較--以臺南市為例〉。《公共事務評論》，9（1），頁27-57。
陳其南，2006，《國族主義到文化公民－台灣文化政策初探》。台北：行政院文化建設委員會。
陳啟光、陳玉真、于長禧、蔡政和（2006）。〈政府機關之間為民服務創新作為擴散過程之探討〉。《品質學報》，第 13 卷第 3 期，頁 329-343。
陳向明，2002，社《會科學質的研究》，台北：五南。
陳昭靜，2005，《影響電子化政府線上資訊服務之因素探討－政策創新觀點》，世新大學行政管理學系碩士論文。
陳景霖，2007，《公私協力夥伴關係之治理模式—以花蓮縣豐田社區總體營造為例》。國立東華大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文。
陳恆鈞，2002，《治理互賴與政策執行》，台北：商鼎。
陳恒鈞、張國偉，2005，〈協力運作模型之初探〉，《法政學報》，第19期，頁41-80。
陳恒鈞、張國偉，2006，〈組織協力與組織績效研究：以雲林縣蔬菜產銷班為例〉，《公共行政學報》，第19期，頁1-54。
陳恒鈞，2008a，〈協力治理模式之初探〉。《T&Ｄ飛訊》，第6期，頁26-37。
陳恒鈞，2008b，〈協力網絡治理之優點與罩門〉。《研習論壇》月刊，第92期，頁40-54。
陳恒鈞，2009，〈參與治理是趨勢？或是迷思？〉。《文官制度季刊》，特刊，頁113-144。
陳敦源、張世杰，2010，〈公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭〉。《文官制度季刊》，2(3)，17-71。
陳欽春，2009，〈文化創意產業及其政策思維：台灣與韓國的比較〉，收錄於徐斯勤、陳德昇主編《文化創意產業、品牌與行銷策略：跨國比較與大陸市場發展》，27-52。台北：印刻出版社。
------，2010，〈當代新公共行政談些什麼？第三次明諾布魯克會議之內容分析〉，發表於2010TASPA台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會，桃園。
黃惠穗，2006，《促進我國文化創意產業發展-公私協力夥伴關係之應用》。東華大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文。
黃朝盟，2005，《公共組織策略規劃之研究：理論、執行與評估》。台北：韋伯文化。
黃榮護、葉益昌（2007），〈價值管理—落實價值領導的基礎〉。收錄於：吳英明等主編，《價值領導與管理：激發公部門生命力的理論與實務分享》，頁23-37。臺北：五南圖書。
黃東益，2004，〈全球治理下政府知識管理的新面向：府際政策學習〉。《國家政策研究季刊》，3(1)，135-153。
黃營杉、汪志堅編譯，Lerlinger, Fred N. and Howard B. Lee著，2002，《研究方法》。台北：華泰文化。
楊志誠，2010a，〈全球化的圖像〉。《文化越界》，1(4)，19-35。
2010b，〈新中華文化的「全球地方化」策略：華人文化創意園區的全球佈局〉，本文發表於「第四屆中華戰略文化論壇」，北京，人民大會堂，2010年9月18日。
溫肇東、許牧彥，2004，《創新機制在政府部門之應用》，行政院研考會委託研究案，編號RDEC-RES-092-006。臺北：行政院研考會。
溫肇東、許牧彥，2004，〈政府機關的創新機制應用〉，收錄於：林嘉誠主編，《知識型政府》，頁307-337。臺北：行政院研考會。
溫肇東，2009，〈韓國文化創意產業：發展思路與取向〉，收錄於徐斯勤、陳德昇主編《文化創意產業、品牌與行銷策略：跨國比較與大陸市場發展》，1-26。台北：印刻出版社。
敬義嘉，2009，《合作治理：再造公共服務的邏輯》。天津：天津人民出版社。
馮久玲，2002，《文化是好生意》。台北市：商周。
彭俊亨、吳政峰、王俊元，2010，〈政策擴散下的創新治理：台灣工藝研究發展中心之經驗與啟發〉。《國家與社會》，第八期，頁99-155。
項維欣，2009，《專案團隊內創意構想守門與創新績效關係之研究-以業界參與科專廠商為例》。政治大學科技管理研究所博士學位論文。
楊式昭，1999，〈光復後台灣重要文化政策之觀察1945-1994〉。《1901-2000台灣文化百年論文集I》，95-39，台北：國立歷史博物館。
廖俊松，2006，〈公私協力：重建區社區總體營造計畫之案例觀察〉。《社區發展季刊》115，324-334。
廖炯志，蕭武桐，2010，〈公部門辦理節慶活動─台北燈節個案分析〉。《策略評論》第10期，35-51。
臧惠平，1993，創新擴散模型在縣市政府業務電腦化之驗證。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
鄭美華，2001，《我國文化行政組織機制調整之研究》。政治大學公共行政研究所博士學位論文。
漢寶德，2009，〈當心，文化與產業兩失！〉，2009.11.29《中國時報時論廣場》，網站：http://www.npf.org.tw/post/1/6778(2009/12/01)
------，2010，〈我看文化創意產業法〉。《藝術家》，418，130-132。
趙永茂，2008，〈地方與區域治理發展的趨勢與挑戰〉。《研考雙月刊》，32(5)，3-15。
劉宜君，2004，《公部門知識管理之探討：理論與實務精析》。台北：韋伯文化。
劉真如譯，Frans Johansson原著，2004，《梅迪奇效應》。台北：商周出版。
劉美芝，2003，《第三部門在我國文化創意產業發展計畫中的角色研究》。台北大學公共行政暨政策研究所碩士學位論文。
劉坤億，2006，〈臺灣地方政府間發展夥伴關係之制度障礙與機會〉。《臺灣民主季刊》，3（3），頁1-34。
劉坤億，2002，〈地方政府治理機制的創新挑戰：市場治理模式的功能與限制〉。《法政學報》， 15，79-114。
劉坤億，2001，《英國政府治理模式變革之研究》。政治大學公共行政學系博士學位論文。
劉榆華，2008，《從政黨輪替看我國文化政策之演變（1996-2008）－以文化預算及公共建設為例》。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文。
劉淑瓊，2008，〈推倒「柏林圍牆」－論家庭暴力防治之網絡治理課題〉。《東吳社會工作學報》，19，1-35。
劉蘭劍，2010，《創新的發生－網絡關係特徵及其影響》。北京：科學出版社。
蔡允棟，2006，〈民主行政與網絡治理：「新治理」的理論探討及類型分析〉。《台灣政治學刊》，10(1)，163-209。
蔡軒軒，2002，《台北市文化政變遷：戰後到九○年代》。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士學位論文。
蔣淑貞、馮建三（譯），2006，T. Miller and G Yudice原著，《文化政策》。台北：巨流出版。
謝宗學等譯，Jon Pierre與B. Guy Peters原著，2002，《治理、政治與國家》。台北：智勝文化。
謝俊義，2007，《公共網絡管理：臺北市政府戶政業務跨機關服務傳遞協力合作網絡實證研究》。政治大學公共行政學系博土位論文。
蘇昭英，2001，《文化論述與文化政策：戰後台灣文化政策轉型的邏輯》。國立藝術學院傳統藝術研究所碩士論文。
蘇登呼，2000，《政府官僚組織內部創新傳佈之研究：以台北市戶政事務所與高雄市衛生局為例》。中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
蘇顯星，2001，《戰後台灣文化政策變遷歷程研究－歷史結構分析》。臺南師範學院鄉土文化研究所碩士論文。
蕭武桐、陳衍宏，2008，〈從新制度論的觀點探討文化創意產業的發展：以新竹玻璃產業為例〉，發表於「全球化下的文化傳承國際學術研討會」，政治大學外語學院跨文化研究中心主辦，2008年9月19日。
蕭瑞麟，2008，《不用數字的研究》，台北：培生教育出版。
Agranoff, R. and M. McGuire (2001). Big Questions in Public Network Management Research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11: 295-326.
_________(2003). Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Agranoff, R. (2007). Managing within Networks: Adding Value to Public Organizations. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Alberti, A. and G. Bertucci (2006). “Replicating Innovations in Governance: An Overview” In United Nations (Ed.), Innovations in Governance and Public Administration:Replicating What Works, pp 1-24. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs of United Nations.
Albury, D. (2005). Fostering innovation in public services. Public Money and Management. 25 January, pp 51 – 6.
Allison, G. T. Jr. (2000). “Public and Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike in All Unimportant Respects?” In Richard J. Stillman (ed) Public Administration: Concepts and Cases, 7th edition, pp. 283- 298. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin.
Altshuler, A. A. and R. D. Behn (eds.) (1997). Innovation in American Government: Challenges,Opportunities, and Dilemmas.Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Alexander, E. R. (1995). How Organizations Act Together: Interorganizational Coordination in Theory and Practice. Australia: Gordon and Breach.
Ansell, C. and A. Gash (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,18(4): 543-571.
Bartlett, Dean and Pauline Dibben (2002). Public Sector Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Case Studies from Local Government. Local Government Studies,28(4):107-121
Bason C. (2010). Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-creating for a better society. UK: The Policy Press.
Behn, R. D. (1997). “The Dilemmas fo Innovation in American Government” in Alan A. Altshuler and Robert D. Behn (eds.) Innovation in American Government: Challenges, Opportunities, and Dilemmas, pp. 3-37.Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Benington, J. (2000). The modernization and improvement of government and public services. Public Money and Management. 20: 2, pp 3 – 8.
Benington, J. (2005). From private choice to public value. Public Management and Policy Association Review, May, 6-10.
Benz, A. and Y. Papadopoulos (Eds.) (2006). Governance and Democracy, London: Routledge.
Berry, F. S. (1994). Innovation in Public Management: The Adoption of Strategic Planning. Public Administration Review, 54(4): 322-30.
Bertucci, G. (2006). Innovations in Governance and Public Administration: Replicating What Works. United Nations New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Bessant, J. (2005). Enabling Continuous and Discontinuous Innovation: Learning From the Private Sector. Public Money & Management, 25 (1): p35-42.
Bland, T. etal., (2010). Enhancing Public Sector Innovation: Examining the Network-Innovation Relationship. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, Volume 15(3), 2010, article 3.
Bloch, C. et al. (2009). Public Sector Innovation Index – A Diagnostic Tool for measuring innovative performance and capability in public sector organizations. Exploratory project commissioned by NESTA.
Bommert, B. (2010). Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. International Public Management Review. Volume 11. Issue 1, pp.15 – 33.
Borins, S. (1998). Innovating with Integrity, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Borins, S. (2000). Loose cannons and rule breakers, or enterprising leaders? Some evidence about innovative public managers. Public Administration Review 60(6): 498-507.
Borins, S. (2001). Innovation, success and failure in public management research: some methodological reflections. Public Management Review 3(1): 3-18.
Borins, S. (ed.) (2008). Innovations in Government: Research, Recognition, and Replication. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Bourgon, J. (2010). The history and future of nation-building? Building capacity for public results. International Review of Administrative Sciences. (76)2, June 2010.195-218.
Bowden, A. (2005). Knowledge for Free? Distributed Innovation as a Source of Learning. Public Policy and Administration, 20; 56-68.
Box, R. C. (1998). Citizen Governance: Leading American Communities into the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
——— (1999). Running Government Like a Business: Implications for Public Administration Theory and Practice. American Review of Public Administration 29(1): 19–43.
Bourgon, J.（2010）. The history and future of nation-building? Building capacity for public results. International Review of Administrative Sciences. （76）2 , June 2010.195-218.
Buen, J. (2006). Danish and Norwegian wind industry: The relationship between policy instruments, innovation and diffusion. Energy Policy, 34 (18): 3887-3897.
Buijs, J. (2007). Innovation Leaders Should Be Controlled Schizophrenics. Creativity and innovation management, 16 (2): 203-210.
Carlson, C. (2007). A Practical Guide To Collaborative Governance. Policy Consensus Initiative. www.policyconsensus.org.(2010/12/03)
Carter, L. and F. Belanger (2005). The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information systems journal, 15 (1): 5-25.
Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chesbrough, Henry (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press.
Chiles, T. H. and J. F. McMackin (1996). Integrating variable risk preferences, trust and transaction cost economics. Academy of Management Review, 21, 73-99.
Clark, J. et al. (2008). Innovation in the Public and Third Sectors. NESTA innovation index Working Paper.
Claver, E. et al. (1999). Public administration: From bureaucratic culture to citizen-oriented culture. International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 12 Iss: 5, pp.455 – 464
Coleman, J.S., E. Katz and H. Menzel (1966). Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. New York: Bobbs Merrill.
Commonwealth of Australia (1994). Creative Nation: Commonwealth Cultural Policy. Canberra: Department of Communications and the Arts.
Considine, M. and J. M. Lewis (2007). Innovation and Innovators Inside Government: From Institutions to Networks. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20 (4): 581–607.
Considine, M., J. Lewis and D. Alexander (2009). Networks, Innovation and Public Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Conway, S. (1995). Informal boundary-spanning communication in the innovation process. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 7(3): 327–342.
Cooper, T. L., T. A. Bryer and J. W. Meek (2008). From Collective Public Management to Collaborative Public Governance: Capacity Building for Sustainability, Minnowbrook III Conference, September 5-7, 2008.
Cummings, S. and A. van Zee (2005). Communities of Practice and Networks: Reviewing Two Perspectives on Social Learning. KM4D Journal, 1(1), 8-22.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555-590.
Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational Size and Innovation, Organization Studies,13, (3), 375-402.
Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational Complexity and Innovation: Developing and Testing Multiple Contingency Models. Management Science, 42, (5), 693-716.
Damanpour, F. and S. Gopalakrishnan (1998). Theories of Organizational Structure and Innovation Adoption: The Role of Environmental Change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, (1), 1-24.
Damanpour, F. and S. Gopalakrishnan (2001). The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 45-65.
Davis, Mike (2003). Building Innovative bureaucracies: Change, Structure, and the Science of Ideas. The Public Manager (Winter): 3-10.
Davidorff, Paul and T. A. Reiner (1962). A Choice Theory of Planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 28, 11-39.
deLeon, L. and R. Denhardt (2000). The Political Theory of Reinvention. Public Administration Review 60(2): 89–97.
Dente, B., Bobbio, L. and Spada, A. (2005). Government or governance of urban innovation?. DISP, 162, 1-22.
Denhardt, R. and J. V. Denhardt (2000). The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering. Public Administration Review 60(6): 549–59.
Downs, A. (1967). Inside Bureaucracy, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Edelenbos, J. and Erik-Hans Klijn. (2007). Trust in Complex Decision-Making Networks: A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration. Administration & Society http://aas.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/39/1/25（2010/11/04）
Edquist, C. and L. Hommen (1999). Systems of innovation: theory and policy for the demand side. Technology and Society, 21, 63-79.
Eggers, B. and, S. Singh (2009). The Public Innovators Playbook, Washington, DC: Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
Elgie, R. and, I. McMenamin（2005）. Credible Commitment, Political Uncertainty or Policy Complexity? Explaining Variations in the Independence of Non-majoritarian Institutions in France. British Journal of Political Science, 35(3):531-548.
Emerson, K. and P. Murchie （2010）. “Collaborative Governance and Climate Change: Opportunities for Public Administration.” In O’Leary, R. et al. （Eds.）, (2010). The Future of Public Administration Around The World: The Minnowbrook Perspective. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press, 141-153.
Esmark, A. (2007). Democratic Accountability and Network Governance: Problems and Potentials. In E. Sorensen, and J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of Democratic Governance (pp. 274-296). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Fagerberg, J., D. C. Mowery and R. R. Nelson (eds.) (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Feiock, R. C. (2004). Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Ferlie, E., L. Fitzgerald, M. Wood and C. Hawkins (2005). The nonspread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management Journal, 48 (1): 17–134.
Foxon, T.J., R. Gross, A. Chase et al. (2005). UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures. Energy policy, 33 (16): 2123-2137.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how It’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Frederickson, H. G.（1991）. Toward a Theory of the Public for Public Administration. Administration and Society 22, no. 4: 395-417.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
Fung, A. (2008). Citizen Participation In Government Innovations. In Borins, S. ed., Innovations in government – Research, Recognition and Replication.Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Garnham, N. (2001). Afterword: The Cultural Commodity and Cultural policy. In: S. Sewood, ed., The UK cultural sector: Profile and policy issue s. London: Policy Studies Institute, 445-458.
Gates, S. and J. Hill (1995). Democratic Accountability and Government Innovation in the Use of Nonprofit Organizations. Public Studies Review 14(1/2): 137-148.
Gloor, Peter A. (2005). Swarm Creativity: Competitive Advantage through Collaborative Innovation Networks, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldsmith, S. and W. Eggers (2004). Governing By Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gripsrud, J. (2000). Learning for Experience: Cultural Policies and Cultural Democracyin the 20th Century. European Journal of Cultural Policy , Vol.7, No.2: pp. 197-209.
Guba, Egon G. and Yvonna S. Lincoln (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hagedoorn, J. (1996). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Schumpeter revisited. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(3), 883-896.
Hall, Peter (1986). Governing the Economy: the Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hall, Peter (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275-269.
Hall, Peter and R.C.R. Taylor (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalism. Political Studies, 44(5):936-957.
Halvorsen, Thomas et al. (2005). “On the differences between public and private sector innovation”, Publin Report, D9.
Hartley, J. and M. Allison (2000). The role of leadership in modernisation and improvement of public services. Public Money and Management. April, pp 35 – 40.
Hartley, Jean (2005). Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present. Public Money & Management, 25(1): 27-34.
Hartley, John (2005). “Creative Industries.” In: J. Hartley, ed. Creative Industries. Oxford: Blackwell, 1-40.
Hartley, J. (2006). Innovation and its Contribution to Improvement: A Literature Review for Policy-makers, Policy Advisors, Managers and Academics, London: Department of Communities and Local Government.
Heclo, Hugh (1978). ‘Issue networks and the executive establishment’, in Anthony King (Ed.), The New American Political System, Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 87–124.
Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Hesmondhalgh, D. and A.C. Pratt (2005). Cultural Industries and Cultural Policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy 11(1): 1-13.
Hess, Michael and David Adams (2007). Innovation in Public Management: The role and Function of Community Kowledge. The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 12(1), 1-20.
Hill, C. and L. Lynn (2005). Is hierarchical governance in decline? Evidence from empirical research, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 15: 2, pp 173 – 95.
Himmelman, A. T. (1996). On the Theory and practice of Transformational Collaboration: From Social Service to Social Justice. In C. Huxham (Ed.), Creating Collaborative Advantage (pp.19-43). London: Sage Publications.
Hipp, C. and H. Grupp (2005). Innovation in the service sector: The demand for service-specific innovation measurement concepts and typologies. Research policy, 34 (4): 517-535.
Hood, Christopher (1991). A New Public Management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69(1), 1-19.
Huxham, C. (1993). Collaborative Capacity: An Intra Organizational Perspective on Collaborative Advantage. Public Money and Management 13(3): 9-21
Huxham, C. (1996). Collaboration and Collaborative Advantage. In Creating Collaborative Advantage, edited by Chris Huxham, 1- 18. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Huxham, C. (2000). The Challeng of Collaborative Governace. Public Management Review, 2(3): 337-358.
Huxham, C. and N. Beech (2003). Contrary prescriptions: Recognizing good practice tensions in management. Organization Studies, 24, 69-93.
Huxham, C. and S. Vangen (2005). Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. London: Routledge.
Irvin, R. and J. Stansbury (2004). Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is it Worth the Effort?. Public Administration Review 64(1): 55-65.
Jones, O., S. Conway and F. Steward (1998). Introduction: Social interaction and innovation networks. International Journal of Innovation Management (Special Issue), 2(2): 123–136.
Jones, O. and M. Beckinsale (1999). Analysing the Innovation Process: Networks,Micropolitics and Structural Change. Research Paper 9919. Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham. http://www.abs.aston.ac/UK/.(2010/08/26).
Jun, J. S.（Ed.）(2002). Rethinking Administrative Theory: The Challenge of New Centry. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Jung, Yong-duck, Daniel Mazmanian, and Shui-Yan Tang（Ed.）(2009). Collaborative Governance in the United States and Korea. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
Keast, R., Mandell, M., Brown, K. and G. Woolcock (2004). Network Structures: Working Differently and Changing Expectations. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 363-371.
Keast, R. and M. P. Mandell (2009). What is Collaboration? ARACY Advancing Collaboration Practice, pp.1-3. Canberra: Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth.
Kelman, Steven (1987). Making Public Policy: A Hopeful View of American Government. New York: Basic Books.
Kelman, S. (2005). Unleashing change: a study of organizational renewal in government. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Kelly, G., G. Mulgan and S. Muers (2002). Creating Public Value: An analytical framework for public service reform. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, UK.
Kersbergen, Kees van and Franz van Waarden (2004). Governance as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 143–171.
Kettl, D. F. (1993). Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets. Washington, D. C.: The Brookings Institution Press.
Kettl, D. F.（2002）. The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty- First Century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kettl, D. F. (2006). Managing Boundaries in American Administration: The Collaboration Imperative. Public Administration Review, 66(Special Issue): 10-19.
Kickert, Walter J. M., Klijn, Erik-Hans, and Joop Koppenjan (Eds.) (1997). Managing Complex Networks, London: Sage.
King, Cheryl S. and Camilla Stivers (Eds.) (1998). Government Is Us: Public Administration in an Anti-Government Era. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Kingdon, John W. (1995). Agendas, Alternative, and Public Policies, 2nd edition. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Klijn, E. H. (1997). Policy Networks: An Overview. In Kickert, Walter J. M., Erik-Hans Klijn and Johannes Franciscus Maria Koppenjan (Eds.), Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector, (pp.14-34). Calif.: Sage. Publications.
Klijn, Erik-Hans and Chris Skelcher (2007). Democracy and governance networks: Compatible or not? , Public Administration, 85(3), 587-608.
Klijn, Erik-Hans et al., (2010). The Impact of Network Management on Outcomes in Governance Networks. Public Administration. Vol. 88, No. 4, (1063–1082).
Koch, P. and J. Hauknes (2005). Innovation in the Public Sector, Oslo: Publin.
Koch et al. (2006). Innovation in the Public Sector: Summary and policy recommendations. Publin Report No. D24.
Koelble, T .A. (1995). The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology. Comparative Politics. 27(2):231-243.
Kooiman, J. and M. Van Vliet (1993). Governance and Public Management. In Managing Public Organizations (2nd edn.), edited by K. Eliassen & J. Kooiman. London: Sage.
Kooiman, J. (ed.) (1993). Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. Newbury Park, UK: Sage.
Kooiman, J. (ed.) (2003). Governing as Governance. London: Sage.
Kooiman, Jan (1993). Findings, speculations and recommendations. In Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, edited by J. Kooiman, pp. 249-262. Newbury Park, UK: Sage.
Kooiman, Jan (1993). Social-political governance: Introduction. In Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, edited by J. Kooiman, pp. 1-6. Newbury Park, UK: Sage.
Koppenjan, Joop and Erik-Hans Klijn (2004). Managing Uncertainties in Networks, London: Routledge.
Korteland, E. and V. Bekkers (2008). The diffusion of electronic service delivery innovations in Dutch E-policing: The case of digital warning systems. Public Management Review, 10 (1): 71 - 88.
Krasner, S .D. (1984). Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics. Comparative Politics Journal,16(2) :223-246.
Kingdon, John W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston: Little Brown.
Klijn, Erik-Hans and Joop Koppenjan (2000). Public management and policy networks: Foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Management, 2(2), 135-158.
Klijn, E.-H. (2008). Complexity Theory and Public Administration: What’s New? , Public Management Review 10(3): 229-317.
Landau, J. (1993). Organizational change and barriers to innovation: a case study in the italian public sector, Human Relations. 46: 12, pp 1411 – 29.
Lenihan, D., J. Milloy, G. Fox and T. Barber（2007）. Progressive Governance for Canadians: What You Need To Know. Ottawa: Public Policy Forum.
Light, P. (1998). Sustaining Innovation: Creating nonprofit and government organizations that innovate naturally. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Love, J. (1999). Patterns of Networking in the Innovation Process: A Comparative Study of the UK, Germany and Ireland. Research Paper 9913. Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham. http://www.abs.aston.ac/UK/.(2010/08/28).
Lundvall, B. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Press.
Luton, Larry S. (2010). Qualitative Research Approaches for Public Administration. NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Lynn, L. (1997). Innovation and the Public Interest: Insights from the Private Sector in Altchuler and R. Behn (Eds) Innovation in American Government, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Mack, W.R., D. Green and A. Vedlitz (2008). Innovation and Implementation in the Public Sector: An Examination of Public Entrepreneurship. Review of Policy Research, 25 (3): 233-252.
Mandell, Myrna (2008). Ways of Working: Civic Engagement Through Networks, in Kaifeng Yang and Erik Bergrud (Eds), Civic Engagement in a Network Society, Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, 65-84.
Mandell, P. M. (Ed.) (2001). Getting Results Through Collaboration: Networks and Networks Structures for Public Policy and Management. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Marinez-Moyano, I. J. (2006). Exploring the Dynamics of Collaboration in Interorganizational Settings, Ch. 4, in Schuman (Editor). Creating a Culture of Collaboration. Jossey-Bass. p. 83
Marquand, D. (2004). Decline of the Public Oxford: Polity Press.
Martin, J. (2000). Innovation Strategies in Australian Local Government: Occasional Paper 4, Melbourne, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. http://
www.ahuri.edu.au/global/docs/innov_localgov.pdf (2010/09/10).
Marsh, David and Rod Rhodes (Eds) (1992). Policy Networks in British Government, Oxford; Oxford University Press.
Mayntz, Renate (1993). Modernization and the logic of interorganizational networks, in John Child, Michel Crozier, and Renate Mayntz (Eds), Societal Change between Markets and Organization, Aldershot: Avebury, 3-18.
Meier, Kenneth J. and Laurence J. O`Toole, (2003). Public Management and Educational Performance: the Impact of Managerial Networking. Public Administration Review. 63(6), 689-699.
Milward, H. B. and K. G. Provan (2003). Managing the Hollow State: Collaborating and Contracting. Public Management Review, 5(1): 1-18.
Moore, Mark H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Moore, M. H., M. Sparrow and W. Spelman (1997). Innovation in Policing: from Production Line to Jobs Shops, in A. Altchuler and R. Behn (Eds), Innovation in American Government, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Moore, M. H. (2005). Break-through innovations and continuous improvement: two different models of innovative processes in the public sector. Public Money and Management. 25: January, pp 43 – 50.
Moore, M. H. and Jean Hartley (2008). Innovations in Governance. Public Management Review, 10(1): 3-20.
Moore, M. H. (2009). Networked Government. In Goldsmith, S. and Kettle, D. ( Eds.), Unlocking the Power of Networks: Keys to High-Performance Government. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Mulcahy, K. V. (2006). Cultural Policy: Definitions and Theoretical Approaches. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 35(4): 319-330.
Mulgan, Geoff and David Albury (2003). Innovations in the public sector. London: Cabinet Office.
Mulgan, G. (2006). God and Bad Power: The Ideals and Betrayals of Government. London, UK: Allen Lane.
Nambisan, Satish (2008). Transforming Government through Collaborative Innovation, Washington, DC: Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
National Audit Office (2006). Achieving Innovation in Central Government Organizations, London: The Stationery Office.
Nelson, R. (1993). National Systems of Innovation. Oxford, Blackwell.
NESTA (2011). Making the transition to collaborative innovation: Issues of readiness, trust and governance.
http://www.nesta.org.uk/library/documents/Collaborative_Innovation_Briefing.pdf（2011/06/01）.
Newman, J. (2001). Modernising Governance. New Labour, Policy and Society, London: Sage.
Newman, Janet , John Raine and Chris Skelcher (2001). Transforming Local Government: Innovation and Modernization. Public Money & Management (April-June): 61-68.
Nice, David C. (1994). Policy Innovation in State Government. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press. Nooteboom, Bart (2000). ‘Institutions and Forms of Co-ordination in Innovation System.’ Organization Studies,21(5): 915-939.
Niskanen, William A. (1987). Bureaucracy, in Charles K. Rowley (Ed.). Democracy and Public Choice, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
O’Connor, J. (1999). The definition of ‘cultural industries. Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester Institute for Popular Culture, Mimeo.
O’Dell, C. and C. J. Grayson (1998). If only we knew what we know. New York: The Free Press.
OECD (2004). Innovation in the Knowledge Economy：Implications for Education and Learning. OECD.
OECD (2009). Focus on Citizens- Public Engagement for Better Policy and Services. OECD.
O’Flynn, Janine and J. Wanna（Eds.）,（2008）.Collaborative Governance：A new era of public policy in Australia? Published by ANU E Press.
http://epress.anu.edu.au/anzsog/collab_gov/html/frames.php(2010/09/10)
O’Leary, Rosemary et al. (2006). Introduction to the Symposium on Collaborative Public Management. Public Administration Review, 66(special): 6-9.
O’Leary, R. and L. B. Bingham (2009). Surprising Findings, Paradoxes, and Thoughts on the Future of Collaborative Public Management Research. In R. O’Leary & L. B. Bingham (Eds.), The Collaborative Public Manager: New Ideas for the Twenty-first Century (pp. 255-269). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
O’Leary, Rosemary et al. （Eds.）, (2010). The Future of Public Administration Around The World: The Minnowbrook Perspective. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
Osborne, David and T. Gaebler (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
Osborne, S. P. and K. Brown (2005). Managing Change and Innovation in Public Service Organizations. London: Routledge.
Ospina, S. and A. Saz-Carranza (2010). Paradox and collaboration in network management. Administration & Society, 42(4), 404-440.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of lnstitutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (1997). Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1): 45-52.
O`Toole, L. and K. Meier (2004). Desperately Seeking Selznick: Cooptation and the Dark Side of Public Management in Networks. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 681-693.
Patel, Imraan (2006). Understanding Innovations and Best Practice. In United Nations (Ed.), Innovations in Governance and Public Administration: Replicating What Works, pp 25-39. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs of United Nations.
Perry, James L. and Ann Marie Thomson. (2004). Civic Service: What Difference Does It Make? Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Perri 6 et al. (2002). Towards Holistic Governance: The New Reform Agenda. New York: Palgrave.
Perry, J. and L. Wise (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service. Public Administration Review, 50(3): 367-73.
Peters, B. G. (1998). Managing horizontal government: the politics of coordination. Public Administration, 76(summer): 295-311.
Peters, B. Guy and Jon Pierre (2000). Is there a Governance Theory. Paper presented to Conference ‘International Political Science Association, Quebec City, August.
Peters, B. Guy and Jon Pierre (2001). Developments in Intergovernmental Relations: Towards Multi-level Governance. Policy and Politics, 29(2): 131-5.
Politt, C. (2007). Toward a New Public Administration Theory: Some Comments on Jocelyne Bourgon’s 5th Braibant lecture, International Review of Administrative Sciences 73(1): 37-41.
Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert (2004). Public Management Reforms, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Powell, W. W. (1998). Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries, California Management Review, 40, 3, pp. 228-240.
Powell, W., W. Koput and L. Smith-Doerr (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, (1),116-130.
Powell W. and P. DiMaggio (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Pratt, A.C.（2005）. Cultural industries and public policy: An oxymoron? International journal of cultural policy, 11(1) 31–44.
Provan, K. G. and B. Milward (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1-33.
Provan, K. G. et al. (2005). The Use of Network Analysis to Strengthen Community Partnerships. Public Administration Review, 65(5): 603-613.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics, 12, 664-683.
Rainey, Hal G. (1999). Using Comparisons of Public and Private Organizations to assess Innovative Attitudes Among Members of Organizations. Public Productivity & Management Review, 23(2):130-149.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies, 44(5): 652-667.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding Governance, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ring, P. S. and A. H. Van de Ven (1992). Structuring cooperative relations between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 483-498.
Roberts, N.C. and T. R. Bradley (1991, June). Stakeholder Collaboration and Innovation: A Study of Policy Initiation at the State Level. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 27 No.2, p. 212.
Orren, K. and S. Kowronek (1994). Beyond the Iconography of Order: Notes for a “New Institutionalism”, In L. C. Dodd and C. Jillson (Eds), The Dynamics of American Politics. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
(2003). Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
Røste, Rannveig (2005). Studies of innovation in the public sector: A theoretical framework, Publin Report, D16.
Røvik, Kjell A. (1992). Institutionaliserede standarder og multistandardorganisasjoner, Statsvetenskapelig Tidsskrift, 8(4), 261-284.
Sabatier, Paul A. (1988). Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process. Political Science and Politics, 24(2), 147-156.
Sabatier, Paul A. (Ed.) (1999). Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder. Colorado: Westview Press.
Salamon, L. M. (2002). The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action: An Introduction. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.). The Tools of Government :A Guide to the New Governance (pp.1-47). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sanderson, I., T. Bovaird, P. Davis, S. Martin and A. Foreman (1998). Made To Measure: Evaluation in Practice in Local Government, London: Local Government Management Board.
Schneider, M., P. Teske and M. Mintron (1995). Public Entrepreneurs: Agents for Change in American Government. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Scharpf, Fritz W. (1994). Games real actors could play: Positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(1), 27-53.
Scharpf, Fritz W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership 3rd ed. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
Schumpeter, Joseph (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, Joseph (1946). Economic Theory and Entrepreneurial History – Change and the Entrepreneur, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Selsky, J. W. and B. Parker (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31, 6, 849-873.
Shao, Y., S. Chen and B. Cheng (2008). Analyses of the Dynamic Factors of Cluster Innovation - A Case Study of Chengdu Furniture Industrial Cluster. International Management Review, 4(1), 51-60.
Sifry, Micah L. (2009). “Lessons from America”. In Reboot Britain. NESTA.
Sim, E. W., A. Griffin, R. L. Price and B. A. Vojak (2007). Exploring Differences between Inventors, Champions, Implementers and Innovators in Creating and Developing New Products in Large, Mature Firms. Creativity and innovation management, 16 (4): 422-436.
Singlaub, K. (2008). Innovation in Public Management: What the Future Will Demand of Us. Public Management, 90 (6): 8-14.
Sirianni, Carmen (2009). Investing in Democracy: Engaging citizens in collaborative governance. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Skelcher, C. K. (2005). Public-private Partnerships and Hybridity in E. Ferlie, L. Lynn and C. Pollitt (Eds) Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 347 – 70.
Skelcher, C. and J. Torfing (2010). Improving democratic governance through institutional design: Civic participation and democratic ownership in Europe, Regulation and Governance, forthcoming.
Soni, Vidu (2005). “Local Government Innovations in American Cities.” In Amita Singh (ed.) Administrative Reforms: Towards Sustainable Practices, pp.117-143. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Sørensen, Eva and J. Torfing (2007). Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sørensen, Eva and J. Torfing (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234-258.
Sørensen, Eva and J. Torfing (2010). Studies in Collaborative Innovation. working paper. Retrieved July 6, 2010, from http://www.ruc.dk/en/departments/department-of-society-and-globalisation/forskningen/samarbejde/clips/biblioteket .
Spence, Muneera U. (2005) Graphic Design Collaborative Processes: a Course in Collaboration. Oregon State University. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: AIGA, 2005.
Retrieved May 31, 2010 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaboration
Stoker, G. (2006). Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1): 41-57.
Sullivan, H., and C. Skelcher (2002). Working across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Subramanian, A. and S. Nilakanta (1996). Organizational Innovativeness: Exploring the Relationship Between Organizational Determinants of Innovation, Types of Innovations, and Measures of Organizational Performance. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 24, (6), 631-647.
Swan, J. and H. Scarbrough (2005). The Politics of Networked Innovation. Human Relations,58(7), 913-943.
Swan, J., H. Scarbrough and M.Robertson (2002). The construction of ‘communities of practice’ in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477-496.
Tang, H. K. (1998). An integrative model of innovation in organizations. Technovation, 18(5), 297-309.
Termeer, C.J.A.M., H. Wesseling and S. Zouridis (2005). De knop om: innovatie in de publieke sector (Switching the knob: innovation in the public sector). Bestuurskunde (Public Administration), 7/8: 9-12.
Terry, Larry D. (1998). Administrative Leadership, Neo-Managerialism, and the Public Management Movement. Public Administration Review 58(3): 194–200.
Thelen, K. and S. Steinmo (1992). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics, In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen and F. Longstreth (Eds), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, pp.1-32. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tidd, Joe, John Bessant and Keith Pavitt (2001). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. 2nd Edition. Chichester,West Sussex: JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd.
Tidd, J., J. Bessant and K. Pavitt (2005). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 3rd edn., Chichester: Wiley.
Thompson, V. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10, 1-20.
Thomson, A. and J. Perry (2006). Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box. Public
Administration Review (Special Issue), 20-32.
Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2008). Modelling the cultural industries. International journal of cultural policy, 14(3) 217–232.
Tolbert, C. J., K. Mossberger and R. McNeal (2008). Institutions, Policy Innovation, and E-Government in the American States. Public Administration Review, 68 (3): 549-563. UNESCO (2003). Culture, Trade and Globalization. [online] http://www.unesco.org/culture/industries/trade/index.shtml ( 2009/11/7 )
Utterback, J. (1996). Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Van de Ven, A. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science. 32, pp 590 – 607.
Van de Ven, A. H. et. al (1999). The Innovation Journey. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Valente, T. W. (1995). Network Models of the Diffussion of Innovations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Vigoda-Gadot, E., A. Shoham, N. Schwabsky and A. Ruvio (2008). Public sector innovation for Europe: a multinational eight-country exploration of citizens’ perspectives. Public Administration, 86 (2): 307–329.
Voß, J.P. (2007). Innovation processes in governance: the development of `emissions trading` as a new policy instrument. Science and Public Policy, 34 (5): 329-343.
Von Hippel, Eric (1988). The Sources of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walker, R., E. Jeanes and R. Rowlands (2002). Measuring innovation: applying the literature-based innovation output indicator to public services. Public Administration. 80, pp 201 – 14.
Walker, Richard M. (2003). Evidence on the Management of Public Services Innovation. Public Money & Management (April): 93-102.
Walker, Richard M. (2006). Innovation Type and Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis of Local Government. Public Administration, 84(2):311-335.
Wanna, John (2008). Collaborative government: meanings, dimensions, drivers and outcomes. in O’Flynn, Janine and John Wanna（Eds.）, Collaborative Governance：A new era of public policy in Australia? Published by ANU E Press.http://epress.anu.edu.au/anzsog/collab_gov/html/frames.php (2010/09/10)
Warford, M. K. (2005). Testing a Diffusion of Innovations in Education Model (DIEM). The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 10 (3): 1-41.
Warren, Mark E. (2009). Governance-Driven Democratization. Critical Policy Analysis, 3(1), 3-13.
Weber, E. P. and A. Khademian (2008). Wicked Problem, knowledge Challenges, and Collaborative Capacity Builder in Network Settings. Public Administration Review, Mar/Apr, 68(2): 334-349.
Weir, Margret (1992). Ideas and the Politics of Bounded Innovation. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen and F. Longstreth (Eds), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, pp.188-216. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Weiss, E. S., R. M. Anderson and R.D. Lasker （2002）. Making the Most of Collaboration: Exploring the Relationship Between Partnership Synergy and Partnership Functioning. Health Education & Behavior, 29(6), 683-698.
Wildavsky, A. (1973). If planning is everything, maybe it’s nothing. Policy Sciences, Volume 4, no. 2, pp. 127-153.
Windrum, P. (2008). Innovation and Entrepreneurship In Public Services. In Innovation in Public Sector Services – Entrepreneurship, Creativity and Management, edited by P. Windrum and P. Koch. Cheltenham, UK; Northhampton, USA: Edward Elgar.
Wirick, David W. (2009). Public-Sector Project Management: Meeting the Challenges and Achieving Results. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Wise, Lois R. (1999). The Use of innovative Practices in the Public and Private Sectors: The Role of Organizational and Individual Factors. Public Productivity & Management Review,23 (1):1 50-168.
Wolfe, R. (1994). Organizational innovation: review, critique, and suggested research directions, Journal of Management Studies. 31, pp 405 – 31.		zh_TW