學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 跨國研發區位選擇與研發網絡治理之研究-以海峽兩岸台商為例
A study of transnational R&D location choice and R&D network governance: Examples for Taiwan’s manufacturing industry across Taiwan strait作者 林淑雯 貢獻者 邊泰明
林淑雯關鍵詞 區域創新系統
研發區位選擇
區位優勢
研發網絡治理
regional innovation system
R&D locational choice
locational advantages
R&D network governance日期 2009 上傳時間 3-九月-2013 14:52:20 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究以區域創新系統觀點，分析在兩岸區位優勢差異下，影響台灣製造業廠商兩岸研發區位選擇及廠商研發網絡治理情形，強化既往研究未同時關注台商、兩岸地區及偏重個案研究的不足之處；經實證結果發現，區位優勢、研發部門類型、市場規模、政策條件、產業群聚、知識流通及研發經費投入等變數為台商兩岸研發區位佈點的影響變數，除了市場規模及市場型研發部門與研發區位選擇呈現負向關係外，其他皆與區位選擇呈現正向關係，顯示除因台灣市場規模太小造成台商選擇至對岸設立研發部門外，台灣在其他表現上皆較對岸具有吸引力，台灣仍具有不可忽視的區域創新能量，建議政府部門應在產業政策上有新作為，提供廠商各項研發所需要的協助，以吸引更多本土企業於台灣設立研發部門，以不斷累積及提升台灣的研發競爭力。區域創新系統強調區域內行動者的網絡連結及互動，形塑該地區無可取代的區域特色，為彌補研發區位選擇的量化研究，無法表達出區域創新系統內廠商在地化網絡連結及互動的情況，本研究在研發網絡治理部分以華碩企業集團為研究對象，探討其如何運用本身及當地資源，建立在地化網絡及維持網絡關係運作等網絡治理議題，經研究結果發現，由於華碩企業集團具有豐富的研發經驗、高水準的研發人員及雄厚的資金，扮演在地化網絡主要行動者的角色，掌握與其他行動者（例如政府部門、研究機構、大專院校及其他廠商等）間關係建立的主導權，在研發技術的傳遞上係以公司內部的垂直組織網絡為主要傳遞路徑，與區域創新系統內各行動者的網絡關係及在地鑲嵌程度不強。
With the viewpoint of regional innovation system, this paper analyzes the impacts of R&D locational choices and enterporises’ R&D network governance that manufacturing firms in Taiwan have under the differentiation of locational advantages between China and Taiwan as well as consolidates some points which are incompletely focused in the past on Taiwanese firms, two sides of Taiwan Strait, and overweighing case-studies. The empirical evidences bring that the impacts of variable to locational distribution of Taiwanese manufacturing firms across the strait are many: locational advantages, the types of R&D unit, the scales of market, policy conditions, industrial clusters, knowledge flows and R&D investment. Except for the negative correlations between the scale of market/type of R&D unit and R&D locational choices, the rest variables have the positive correlation with R&D locational choices, which means that, barring that the scale of market in Taiwan is so small that Taiwanese firms choose to institute R&D spots in China, other variables in Taiwan are more attractive than those in China; Taiwan possesses innegligible energy of regional creativity. The suggestion is that the government has to take new actions on industrial policy, providing the assistance to R&D that enterprises need, in order to attract more and more local enterprises to set up their R&D functions in Taiwan for accumulating and advancing Taiwan’s competitive power continuously. Regional innovation system emphasizes on actors’ network linkages and interactions within one region, shaping irreplaceable regional characteristics for that region in order to atone for the quantitative research of R&D locational choices which cannot express the situation of enterprises’ localized network linkages and interactions within regional innovation system. Taking ASUS as example, this research, in terms of network governance, confers how ASUS draws on own and local resources for network governance issues like establishing localized networks and maintaining the operation of network relations. After the analysis, it is found that, on account of ASUS with abundant R&D experiences, high-level R&D staffs and tremendous funds, ASUS plays the role as key actor in the localized network, controlling the predominant power established by relations between other actors (i.e. public sectors, research institutes, colleges/universities, other enterprises and so on). In terms of R&D technology transfer, vertical networks in the inner company as main transfer passage is less attached with every actor’s network relation and its local embeddedness within regional innovation system.參考文獻 一、中文文獻王振寰（1997），跨國界區域經濟形成的統理機制：以台灣資本外移南中國為例，「台灣社會研究季刊」，第27期，第1-36頁。王緝慈等（2001），「創新的空間—企業集群與區域發展」，北京：北京大學。沈明展、林淑雯、邊泰明（2006），台灣地區工業園區公共服務價值評估之研究，「台灣土地研究」，第8卷第2期，第49-72頁。沈明展、林淑雯、邊泰明（2006），工業園區公共服務廠商滿意度與制度因素之研究，「住宅學報」，第15卷第2期，第23-44頁（實際出刊日：2007年）。吳青松（1999），「國際企業管理－理論與實務」，台北：智勝出版社。吳濟華、陳協勝（2001），台灣地區工業區廠商創新擴散及其空間互動之探討，「中山管理評論」，第9卷第2期，第179-200頁。林玉華（2002），政策網絡的治理模式︰以英國與歐盟為例，「行政暨政策學報」，第34期，第35-55頁。林淑雯（2009），「地區環境、網絡與廠商研發投入-台灣製造業的實證分析」，規劃學報，第36期，第1-23頁。胡嘉瑋（2008），「企業集團兩岸投資空間區位選擇之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。徐進鈺（1998），邁向一個學習性的區域?台北-新竹高科技走廊的廠商聚集與技術學習，「國立台灣師範大學地理研究報告」，第29期，第143-159頁。陳信宏（2004），研發國際化與地主國區位優勢：旗艦級跨國企業在兩岸研發中心之比較，「台灣管理學刊」，第4卷第3期，第289-316頁。康信鴻、廖婉孜（2006），影響台商赴大陸投資額與投資區位因素之實證研究，「Chiao Da Management Review」, 第26卷第1期，第15-38頁。楊友仁、夏鑄九（2005），跨界生產網絡之在地鑲嵌與地方性制度之演化：以大東筦地區為例，「都市與計劃」，第32卷第3期，第277-301頁。劉孟俊、陳信宏（2007），跨國研發網絡與研發國際化：海外子公司的分析觀點，「台大管理論叢」，第18卷第1期，第211-238頁。劉孟俊 (2007)，「區域創新與台商大陸研發網絡」，2007兩岸經濟發展與轉型研討會論文集，第183-209頁。蓋文啟（2002），「創新網絡－區域經濟發展新思維」，北京：北京大學。魏 艾（2003），「中國大陸經濟發展與市場轉型」，台北：揚智出版社。魏啟林、陳厚銘（1995），台灣廠商對外投資之區位選擇—折衷典範與網路變數分析，「管理科學學報」，第12卷第2期，第153-168頁。二、英文文獻Aldrich, J. and Nelson, F. D. (1984). Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Amsden, A., Tschang, T. and Goto, A. (2001). Do foreign companies conduct R&D in developing countries, ADB Institute Working Paper 14, Tokyo Asian Development Bank Institute.Anderson, E. and Gatignon, H. (1986). Mode of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and proposition, Journal of International Business Studies, 17 (1) : 1-26.Anderson, G. (1994). Industry clustering for economic development, Economic Development Review, spring, 26-32.Angel, S. P. (2002). Inter-firm collaboration and technology development partnerships within U.S. manufacturing industries, Regional Studies, 36(4) : 33-344.Asheim, B. and Isaksen, A. (1997). Location, agglomeration and innovation: towards regional innovation systems in Norway, European Planning Studies, 5(3)：299-330.Beise, M. and Stahl, H. (1999). Public research and industrial innovations in Germany, Research Policy, 28(4) : 397-422.Best, M. (1990). The new competition: Institutions of industrial restructuring, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Billington, N. (1999). The Location of foreign direct investment：an Empirical analysis, Applied Economics, 31(1) : 65-76.Biemans, W. (1996). Organizational networks: toward a cross-fertilzation between practice and theory, Journal of Business Research, 35(1) : 29-39. Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment, Regional Studies, 39(1):61-74.Buckley, P. J. and Casson, M. C. (1976). Future of the Enterprise, London: Macmillan.Cabral, R. and Dahab, S. S. (1998). Science parks indeveloping countries：the case of BIORIO in Brazil, International Journal of Technology Management, 16(8): 726-739.Camagni, R. (1995). The concept of innovative milieu and its relevance for public polices in European Lagging Regions, The Journal of the RSAI, 74(4): 317-340.Cantwell, J. (1992). The internationalization of technological activity and its implication for competitiveness, Technology management and international business – Internationalization of R&D and technology, 75-79.Casson, M. and Singh, S. (1993). Corporate research and development strategies: The influence of firm, industry and country factor on the decentralization of R&D, R&D Management, 23(2): 91-107. Chen, H. F. and Wang, I. C. (2001). The determinants and effects of embeddedness on MNC’s subsidiaries, International Conference on Ttrade, Investment, and Industrial Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region, Taipei: Soochow University.Cheng, L. K. and Kwan, Y. K. (2000). What are the determinants of the location of foreign direct investment? The Chinese experience, Journal of International Economics, 51(2) : 379-400.Chen, S. H. (2004). Taiwanese IT firms’ offshore R&D in China and the connection with global innovation network, Research Policy, 33(2): 337-349.Chen, Y.-C. (2003). Latecomer cities becoming new global innovation centers: case studies of multinational corporations? R&D centers in Shanghai and Beijing, International Conference on 2003 Annual Meeting of Association of American Geographers.Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H. W.-C., Dicken, P. and Henderson, J. (2004). Globalizing regional development: A global production networks perspective，Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4) : 468-484.Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe, Geoforum, 23: 365-382.Cooke, P. and Morgan, K. (1993). The network paradigm - new departures in corporate and regional development, Environment and Planning D-Society & Space, 11: 543-564.Cooke, P. (1998). Regional Innovation Systems: The role of governance in a globalized world, Braczyk, H., Cooke, P. and Heidenreich, M. ( eds) , London.Cooke, P. (2002). Biotechnology clusters, International Regional Science Review, 25(1):18.Davidson, W. H. (1980). The location of foreign direct investment activity: Country characteristics and experience effect, Journal of International Business Studies, 11(2) : 9-22.Dicken, P., Forsgren, M. and Malmberg, A. (1994). The local embeddedness of transnational corporations, in globalization, institutions and regional development in Europe, edited by Amin, A. and Thrift, N., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Dicken, P. (1998). Global Shift (3rd Edition), London: Paul Chapman.Doloreux, D. (2002). What we should know about regional systems of innovation, Technology in Society, 24 : 243-263.Dunning, J. H. (1973). The determinants of international production, Oxford Economic Papers, 25(3) : 289–386.Dunning, J. H. (1980). Towards an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1) : 9-31.Dunning, J. H. (1988). Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor?, Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1)：45-66.Evangelista, R., Iammarino, S., Mastrostefano, V. and Silvani, A. (2002). Looking for regional systems of innovation: evidence from the Italian innovation survey, Regional Studies, 36(2):173-186.Feldman, M. P. and Florida, R. (1994). The geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States, Annals of the Association of American Geographer, 84(2) : 210-229.Ferdows, K. (1997). Making the most of foreign factories, Harvard Business Review, 75(2)：73-88.Florida, R. (1995), Toward the learning region, Futures, 27(5) : 527-536.Fors, G. and Zejan, M. (1996). Overseas R&D by multinationals in foreign centers of excellence, Working Paper no.111, The Economic Research Institute, Estocolmo: Stockholm School of Economics.Freeman, C. (1995). The “national system of innovation” in historical perspective, Cambridge Journal of economics, 19(1) : 5-24.Gao, T. (2000). Multinational activity and country characteristics in OECD countries, Manuscript. Gebauer, A., Chang, W.-N. and Parsche, R. (2005), Regional technology policy and factors shaping local innovation networks in small German cities, European Planning Studies, 13(5) : 661-683.Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A. and Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities, The Journal of Political Economy, 100(6) : 1126-1152.Gordon, I. and McCann, P. (2000). Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks, Urban Studies, 37(3):513-532.Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91:481-510.Gulati, R., Nohria, N. and Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks, Strategic Management Journal, 21:203-215. Guellec, D. and Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2001). The internationalization of technology analyzed with patent data, Research Policy, 30(8) : 1253-1266. Harrigan, J. (1995). Factor endowments and the international location of production: Econometric evidence for the OECD, 1970-1985, Journal of International Economics, 39(1)：123-142.Heimann, P. (2005). Foreign-owned R&D facilities in China, England, Germany, and Sweden: An analysis of regional entry and integration behavior, Working Paper, University of Augsburg, Germany, Faculty of Economics.Henderson, V., Kuncoro, A. and Turner, M. (1995). Industrial development in cities, Journal of Political Economy, 103(5) : 1067-1090.Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P. and Kim, C. W. (1990). An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode , Strategic Management Journal, (11)：117-128.Holm, D. B., Eriksson K. and Johanson, J. (1999), Creating value through mutual commitment to business network relationships, Strategic Management Journal, 20 : 467-486.Hoover, E. M. (1948), The location of economic activity, New York.Howell, J. (1999). Regional systems of innovation? In Archibugi, D., Howells, J., Michie, J.,（eds), Innovation Policy in a Global Economy, Cambridge University Press, 67-93.Hymer, S. H. (1976). The international operations of national firm: A study of direct foreign investment, Cambrige MA: MIT Press.Isaksen, A. (2001). Building regional innovations systems: is endogenous industrial development possible in the global economy, Canadian Journal of Regional Science/Revue canadienne des sciences régionales, XXIV (1) : 101-120.Karlsson, C. (2003). The development of industrial networks: challenges to operations management in an extraprise, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(1) : 44-61.Kojima, K. (1978). Direct foreign investment: A Japanese model of multinational business operations, London, UK: Croom Helm.Koschatzky, K. and Sternberg, R. (2000). R&D cooperation in innovation systems-some lessons from the European Regional Innovation Survey（ERIS）, European Planning Studies, 8(4):487-501.Kumar, N. (2001). Determinants ol location of overseas R&D avtivity of multinational enterprises: The case of US and Japanese corporations, Research Policy, 30:159-174.Kuemmerle, W. (1999). Foreign direct investment in industrial research in the pharmaceutical and electronics industries: Results from a survey of multinational firms, Research Policy, 28(2/3): 179-193.Langvik, T. A., Johansen, F. R., Callisen, F., Normannn, S. and Thoresen, J. (2005). Innovation and regional development, AI & Society, 19(4) : 384-406.Leach, R. and Percy-Smith, J. (2001). Local Governance in Britian, New York, Palgrave.Lin, S.-W. and Ben, T.-M. (2009). Impact of government and industrial agglomeration on industrial land prices: A Taiwanese case study, Habitat International, 33(4) : 412-418.Liebeskind, J. P., Oliver, A. L., Zucker, L. and Brewer, M. (1966). Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms, Organization Science, 7(4) : 428-443.Lorenzen, M. and Mahnke, V. (2002). Global strategy and the acquisition of local knowledge: How MNC’s enter regional knowledge clusters, DRUID Working Paper : 02-08.Lu, L. Y. Y. and Liu, J. S. (2004). R&D in China: An empirical study of Taiwanese IT companies, R&D Management, 34(4):453-465.Lundvall, B.A. (1999). National business systems and national systems of innovation, Int. Studies of Mgt. & Org., 29(2) : 60-77.Marshall, A. (1890). Principal of economics：An introductory volume, New York, Free Press.Markusen, A. (1996). Sticky places in slippery space, Economic Geography, 72(3) : 293-313.Mckendrick, D. G., Doner, R. F. and Haggard, S.(2000). From Silicon Valley to Singapore: Location and competitive advantages in the hard disk drive industry, Stanford: Stanford University.Miles, R., and Snow, C. (1992). Causes of failure in network organizations, California Management Review, 34(4) : 53-72. Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal, Regional Studies, 31(5) : 491-503.Nicholas, S., Purcell, W. and Gray, S. (2001). Regional clusters, location tournaments and incentives: An empirical analysis of factors attracting Japanese investment to Singapore, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18(3): 395-405.OECD. (1997). Globalization of research and development: A business viewpoint, Paris: OECD. Oerlemans, L. A. G. and Meeus, M. T. H. (2005). Do organizational and spatial proximity impact on firm performance, Regional Studies, 39(1) : 89-104.Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1991). Large firms in the production of the world`s technology an important case of non – globalization, Journal of International Business Studies, 22：1-21.Petrella, R. (1989). Globalization of technological innovation, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1(4): 393-407.Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations, London: Macmillan.Premus, R., Sanders, N. and Jain, R. K. (2003). Role of the university in regional economic development: The US experience, International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 2(4) : 369-383.Powell, W. W. (1987). Hybrid organizational qrrangements : New from transitional development, California Management Review, 67-87.Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance : Policy network, governance, reflexivity and accountability, Buckingham: Open University Press.Robertson, P. L. and Langlois, R. N. (1995). Innovation networks and vertical integration, Research Policy, 24(4): 543-562.Ronstadt, R. C. (1978). International R&D : The establishment and evolution of research and development abroad by seven U.S. multinationals, Journal of International Business Studies, 9 : 7-24.Root, F. B. (1994). Entry strategies for international markets, rev. and expanded, MA: Lexington Books.Serapio, M. G. and Dalton, D. H. (1999). Globalization of industrial R&D: An examination of foreign direct investments in R&D in the United States, Research Policy, 28: 303-316.Sigurdson, J. (2006). Technological superpower China, USA.Simmie, J. (2005). Innovation and space: a critical review of the literature, Regional Studies, 39(6): 789-804.Teece, D. J. (1996). Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 193-224. Stoker, G. (1998). Public-private partnership and urban governance, in Pierre, J.(ed.), Partnership in Urban Governance: European and AmericanExperience. London: Macmillan, pp.34-51.Storper, M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies, European Urban and Regional Studies, 2:191-222Tödtling, F. and Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach, Research Policy, 34：1203-1219.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2005). World investment report 2005: Transnational corporations and internationalization of R&D, Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35-67.Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the Product Cycle, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2) : 190-207.Weber, A. (1909). Theory of the location of industry, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Williamson, O. (1975). Market and hierarchy: Analysis and antitrust implications, New York: Free Press.Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism, New York: Free Press.Witt, U. (1997). Lock-in v.s. critical masses- industrial change under network externalities, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15:753-773.Yu, C. M. J. and Ito, K. (1988). Oligopolistic reaction and foreign direct investment: The case of the U.S. tire and textiles industries, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 449-460.Zejan, M. C. (1990). R&D activities in affiliates of Swedish multinational enterprises, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 92(3) : 487- 500.Zhang, K. H. (2001). What attracts foreign multinational corporations to China, Contemporary Economic Policy, 19(3) : 336-346.Zukin, S. and Dimaggio, P. (1990). Structures of capital: The social organization of the economy, Cambridge University Press. 描述 博士
國立政治大學
地政研究所
93257501
98資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0932575011 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 邊泰明 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) 林淑雯 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) 林淑雯 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2009 en_US dc.date.accessioned 3-九月-2013 14:52:20 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 3-九月-2013 14:52:20 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-九月-2013 14:52:20 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0932575011 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59822 - dc.description (描述) 博士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 地政研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 93257501 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 98 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究以區域創新系統觀點，分析在兩岸區位優勢差異下，影響台灣製造業廠商兩岸研發區位選擇及廠商研發網絡治理情形，強化既往研究未同時關注台商、兩岸地區及偏重個案研究的不足之處；經實證結果發現，區位優勢、研發部門類型、市場規模、政策條件、產業群聚、知識流通及研發經費投入等變數為台商兩岸研發區位佈點的影響變數，除了市場規模及市場型研發部門與研發區位選擇呈現負向關係外，其他皆與區位選擇呈現正向關係，顯示除因台灣市場規模太小造成台商選擇至對岸設立研發部門外，台灣在其他表現上皆較對岸具有吸引力，台灣仍具有不可忽視的區域創新能量，建議政府部門應在產業政策上有新作為，提供廠商各項研發所需要的協助，以吸引更多本土企業於台灣設立研發部門，以不斷累積及提升台灣的研發競爭力。區域創新系統強調區域內行動者的網絡連結及互動，形塑該地區無可取代的區域特色，為彌補研發區位選擇的量化研究，無法表達出區域創新系統內廠商在地化網絡連結及互動的情況，本研究在研發網絡治理部分以華碩企業集團為研究對象，探討其如何運用本身及當地資源，建立在地化網絡及維持網絡關係運作等網絡治理議題，經研究結果發現，由於華碩企業集團具有豐富的研發經驗、高水準的研發人員及雄厚的資金，扮演在地化網絡主要行動者的角色，掌握與其他行動者（例如政府部門、研究機構、大專院校及其他廠商等）間關係建立的主導權，在研發技術的傳遞上係以公司內部的垂直組織網絡為主要傳遞路徑，與區域創新系統內各行動者的網絡關係及在地鑲嵌程度不強。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) With the viewpoint of regional innovation system, this paper analyzes the impacts of R&D locational choices and enterporises’ R&D network governance that manufacturing firms in Taiwan have under the differentiation of locational advantages between China and Taiwan as well as consolidates some points which are incompletely focused in the past on Taiwanese firms, two sides of Taiwan Strait, and overweighing case-studies. The empirical evidences bring that the impacts of variable to locational distribution of Taiwanese manufacturing firms across the strait are many: locational advantages, the types of R&D unit, the scales of market, policy conditions, industrial clusters, knowledge flows and R&D investment. Except for the negative correlations between the scale of market/type of R&D unit and R&D locational choices, the rest variables have the positive correlation with R&D locational choices, which means that, barring that the scale of market in Taiwan is so small that Taiwanese firms choose to institute R&D spots in China, other variables in Taiwan are more attractive than those in China; Taiwan possesses innegligible energy of regional creativity. The suggestion is that the government has to take new actions on industrial policy, providing the assistance to R&D that enterprises need, in order to attract more and more local enterprises to set up their R&D functions in Taiwan for accumulating and advancing Taiwan’s competitive power continuously. Regional innovation system emphasizes on actors’ network linkages and interactions within one region, shaping irreplaceable regional characteristics for that region in order to atone for the quantitative research of R&D locational choices which cannot express the situation of enterprises’ localized network linkages and interactions within regional innovation system. Taking ASUS as example, this research, in terms of network governance, confers how ASUS draws on own and local resources for network governance issues like establishing localized networks and maintaining the operation of network relations. After the analysis, it is found that, on account of ASUS with abundant R&D experiences, high-level R&D staffs and tremendous funds, ASUS plays the role as key actor in the localized network, controlling the predominant power established by relations between other actors (i.e. public sectors, research institutes, colleges/universities, other enterprises and so on). In terms of R&D technology transfer, vertical networks in the inner company as main transfer passage is less attached with every actor’s network relation and its local embeddedness within regional innovation system. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究動機與目的 1第二節 研究範疇與內容 5第三節 研究方法與流程 7第二章 理論與文獻回顧 11第一節 跨國投資理論及進入模式 11第二節 跨國研發區位選擇 19第三節 區域創新系統論述 27第四節 網絡理論 37第五節 網絡治理與鑲嵌 43第三章 兩岸投資交流分析與區域創新系統比較 47第一節 兩岸投資交流分析 47第二節 兩岸區域創新系統比較分析 59第四章 研究設計 71第一節 研究設計與假說研擬 71第二節 實證對象分析 75第三節 問卷調查及樣本資料分析 81第五章 跨國研發區位選擇與網絡治理 89第一節 實證模型建立 89第二節 實證模型校估 93第三節 假說驗證及實證結果分析 99第四節 研發網絡治理分析 103第六章 結論與建議 111第一節 結論 111第二節 建議 115參考文獻 117附錄 125附錄一：1991~2009年台灣對大陸投資產業別分析表（製造業為例） 125附錄二：2009年台灣對大陸投資區位及產業別分析表（製造業為例） 128附錄三：台灣製造業廠商兩岸研發區位選擇調查問卷 131 zh_TW dc.format.extent 3811458 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.language.iso en_US - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0932575011 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 區域創新系統 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 研發區位選擇 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 區位優勢 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 研發網絡治理 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) regional innovation system en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) R&D locational choice en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) locational advantages en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) R&D network governance en_US dc.title (題名) 跨國研發區位選擇與研發網絡治理之研究-以海峽兩岸台商為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) A study of transnational R&D location choice and R&D network governance: Examples for Taiwan’s manufacturing industry across Taiwan strait en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文文獻王振寰（1997），跨國界區域經濟形成的統理機制：以台灣資本外移南中國為例，「台灣社會研究季刊」，第27期，第1-36頁。王緝慈等（2001），「創新的空間—企業集群與區域發展」，北京：北京大學。沈明展、林淑雯、邊泰明（2006），台灣地區工業園區公共服務價值評估之研究，「台灣土地研究」，第8卷第2期，第49-72頁。沈明展、林淑雯、邊泰明（2006），工業園區公共服務廠商滿意度與制度因素之研究，「住宅學報」，第15卷第2期，第23-44頁（實際出刊日：2007年）。吳青松（1999），「國際企業管理－理論與實務」，台北：智勝出版社。吳濟華、陳協勝（2001），台灣地區工業區廠商創新擴散及其空間互動之探討，「中山管理評論」，第9卷第2期，第179-200頁。林玉華（2002），政策網絡的治理模式︰以英國與歐盟為例，「行政暨政策學報」，第34期，第35-55頁。林淑雯（2009），「地區環境、網絡與廠商研發投入-台灣製造業的實證分析」，規劃學報，第36期，第1-23頁。胡嘉瑋（2008），「企業集團兩岸投資空間區位選擇之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。徐進鈺（1998），邁向一個學習性的區域?台北-新竹高科技走廊的廠商聚集與技術學習，「國立台灣師範大學地理研究報告」，第29期，第143-159頁。陳信宏（2004），研發國際化與地主國區位優勢：旗艦級跨國企業在兩岸研發中心之比較，「台灣管理學刊」，第4卷第3期，第289-316頁。康信鴻、廖婉孜（2006），影響台商赴大陸投資額與投資區位因素之實證研究，「Chiao Da Management Review」, 第26卷第1期，第15-38頁。楊友仁、夏鑄九（2005），跨界生產網絡之在地鑲嵌與地方性制度之演化：以大東筦地區為例，「都市與計劃」，第32卷第3期，第277-301頁。劉孟俊、陳信宏（2007），跨國研發網絡與研發國際化：海外子公司的分析觀點，「台大管理論叢」，第18卷第1期，第211-238頁。劉孟俊 (2007)，「區域創新與台商大陸研發網絡」，2007兩岸經濟發展與轉型研討會論文集，第183-209頁。蓋文啟（2002），「創新網絡－區域經濟發展新思維」，北京：北京大學。魏 艾（2003），「中國大陸經濟發展與市場轉型」，台北：揚智出版社。魏啟林、陳厚銘（1995），台灣廠商對外投資之區位選擇—折衷典範與網路變數分析，「管理科學學報」，第12卷第2期，第153-168頁。二、英文文獻Aldrich, J. and Nelson, F. D. (1984). Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Amsden, A., Tschang, T. and Goto, A. (2001). Do foreign companies conduct R&D in developing countries, ADB Institute Working Paper 14, Tokyo Asian Development Bank Institute.Anderson, E. and Gatignon, H. (1986). Mode of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and proposition, Journal of International Business Studies, 17 (1) : 1-26.Anderson, G. (1994). Industry clustering for economic development, Economic Development Review, spring, 26-32.Angel, S. P. (2002). Inter-firm collaboration and technology development partnerships within U.S. manufacturing industries, Regional Studies, 36(4) : 33-344.Asheim, B. and Isaksen, A. (1997). Location, agglomeration and innovation: towards regional innovation systems in Norway, European Planning Studies, 5(3)：299-330.Beise, M. and Stahl, H. (1999). Public research and industrial innovations in Germany, Research Policy, 28(4) : 397-422.Best, M. (1990). The new competition: Institutions of industrial restructuring, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Billington, N. (1999). The Location of foreign direct investment：an Empirical analysis, Applied Economics, 31(1) : 65-76.Biemans, W. (1996). Organizational networks: toward a cross-fertilzation between practice and theory, Journal of Business Research, 35(1) : 29-39. Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment, Regional Studies, 39(1):61-74.Buckley, P. J. and Casson, M. C. (1976). Future of the Enterprise, London: Macmillan.Cabral, R. and Dahab, S. S. (1998). Science parks indeveloping countries：the case of BIORIO in Brazil, International Journal of Technology Management, 16(8): 726-739.Camagni, R. (1995). The concept of innovative milieu and its relevance for public polices in European Lagging Regions, The Journal of the RSAI, 74(4): 317-340.Cantwell, J. (1992). The internationalization of technological activity and its implication for competitiveness, Technology management and international business – Internationalization of R&D and technology, 75-79.Casson, M. and Singh, S. (1993). Corporate research and development strategies: The influence of firm, industry and country factor on the decentralization of R&D, R&D Management, 23(2): 91-107. Chen, H. F. and Wang, I. C. (2001). The determinants and effects of embeddedness on MNC’s subsidiaries, International Conference on Ttrade, Investment, and Industrial Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region, Taipei: Soochow University.Cheng, L. K. and Kwan, Y. K. (2000). What are the determinants of the location of foreign direct investment? The Chinese experience, Journal of International Economics, 51(2) : 379-400.Chen, S. H. (2004). Taiwanese IT firms’ offshore R&D in China and the connection with global innovation network, Research Policy, 33(2): 337-349.Chen, Y.-C. (2003). Latecomer cities becoming new global innovation centers: case studies of multinational corporations? R&D centers in Shanghai and Beijing, International Conference on 2003 Annual Meeting of Association of American Geographers.Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H. W.-C., Dicken, P. and Henderson, J. (2004). Globalizing regional development: A global production networks perspective，Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4) : 468-484.Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe, Geoforum, 23: 365-382.Cooke, P. and Morgan, K. (1993). The network paradigm - new departures in corporate and regional development, Environment and Planning D-Society & Space, 11: 543-564.Cooke, P. (1998). Regional Innovation Systems: The role of governance in a globalized world, Braczyk, H., Cooke, P. and Heidenreich, M. ( eds) , London.Cooke, P. (2002). Biotechnology clusters, International Regional Science Review, 25(1):18.Davidson, W. H. (1980). The location of foreign direct investment activity: Country characteristics and experience effect, Journal of International Business Studies, 11(2) : 9-22.Dicken, P., Forsgren, M. and Malmberg, A. (1994). The local embeddedness of transnational corporations, in globalization, institutions and regional development in Europe, edited by Amin, A. and Thrift, N., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Dicken, P. (1998). Global Shift (3rd Edition), London: Paul Chapman.Doloreux, D. (2002). What we should know about regional systems of innovation, Technology in Society, 24 : 243-263.Dunning, J. H. (1973). The determinants of international production, Oxford Economic Papers, 25(3) : 289–386.Dunning, J. H. (1980). Towards an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1) : 9-31.Dunning, J. H. (1988). Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor?, Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1)：45-66.Evangelista, R., Iammarino, S., Mastrostefano, V. and Silvani, A. (2002). Looking for regional systems of innovation: evidence from the Italian innovation survey, Regional Studies, 36(2):173-186.Feldman, M. P. and Florida, R. (1994). The geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States, Annals of the Association of American Geographer, 84(2) : 210-229.Ferdows, K. (1997). Making the most of foreign factories, Harvard Business Review, 75(2)：73-88.Florida, R. (1995), Toward the learning region, Futures, 27(5) : 527-536.Fors, G. and Zejan, M. (1996). Overseas R&D by multinationals in foreign centers of excellence, Working Paper no.111, The Economic Research Institute, Estocolmo: Stockholm School of Economics.Freeman, C. (1995). The “national system of innovation” in historical perspective, Cambridge Journal of economics, 19(1) : 5-24.Gao, T. (2000). Multinational activity and country characteristics in OECD countries, Manuscript. Gebauer, A., Chang, W.-N. and Parsche, R. (2005), Regional technology policy and factors shaping local innovation networks in small German cities, European Planning Studies, 13(5) : 661-683.Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A. and Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities, The Journal of Political Economy, 100(6) : 1126-1152.Gordon, I. and McCann, P. (2000). Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks, Urban Studies, 37(3):513-532.Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91:481-510.Gulati, R., Nohria, N. and Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks, Strategic Management Journal, 21:203-215. Guellec, D. and Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2001). The internationalization of technology analyzed with patent data, Research Policy, 30(8) : 1253-1266. Harrigan, J. (1995). Factor endowments and the international location of production: Econometric evidence for the OECD, 1970-1985, Journal of International Economics, 39(1)：123-142.Heimann, P. (2005). Foreign-owned R&D facilities in China, England, Germany, and Sweden: An analysis of regional entry and integration behavior, Working Paper, University of Augsburg, Germany, Faculty of Economics.Henderson, V., Kuncoro, A. and Turner, M. (1995). Industrial development in cities, Journal of Political Economy, 103(5) : 1067-1090.Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P. and Kim, C. W. (1990). An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode , Strategic Management Journal, (11)：117-128.Holm, D. B., Eriksson K. and Johanson, J. (1999), Creating value through mutual commitment to business network relationships, Strategic Management Journal, 20 : 467-486.Hoover, E. M. (1948), The location of economic activity, New York.Howell, J. (1999). Regional systems of innovation? In Archibugi, D., Howells, J., Michie, J.,（eds), Innovation Policy in a Global Economy, Cambridge University Press, 67-93.Hymer, S. H. (1976). The international operations of national firm: A study of direct foreign investment, Cambrige MA: MIT Press.Isaksen, A. (2001). Building regional innovations systems: is endogenous industrial development possible in the global economy, Canadian Journal of Regional Science/Revue canadienne des sciences régionales, XXIV (1) : 101-120.Karlsson, C. (2003). The development of industrial networks: challenges to operations management in an extraprise, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(1) : 44-61.Kojima, K. (1978). Direct foreign investment: A Japanese model of multinational business operations, London, UK: Croom Helm.Koschatzky, K. and Sternberg, R. (2000). R&D cooperation in innovation systems-some lessons from the European Regional Innovation Survey（ERIS）, European Planning Studies, 8(4):487-501.Kumar, N. (2001). Determinants ol location of overseas R&D avtivity of multinational enterprises: The case of US and Japanese corporations, Research Policy, 30:159-174.Kuemmerle, W. (1999). Foreign direct investment in industrial research in the pharmaceutical and electronics industries: Results from a survey of multinational firms, Research Policy, 28(2/3): 179-193.Langvik, T. A., Johansen, F. R., Callisen, F., Normannn, S. and Thoresen, J. (2005). Innovation and regional development, AI & Society, 19(4) : 384-406.Leach, R. and Percy-Smith, J. (2001). Local Governance in Britian, New York, Palgrave.Lin, S.-W. and Ben, T.-M. (2009). Impact of government and industrial agglomeration on industrial land prices: A Taiwanese case study, Habitat International, 33(4) : 412-418.Liebeskind, J. P., Oliver, A. L., Zucker, L. and Brewer, M. (1966). Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms, Organization Science, 7(4) : 428-443.Lorenzen, M. and Mahnke, V. (2002). Global strategy and the acquisition of local knowledge: How MNC’s enter regional knowledge clusters, DRUID Working Paper : 02-08.Lu, L. Y. Y. and Liu, J. S. (2004). R&D in China: An empirical study of Taiwanese IT companies, R&D Management, 34(4):453-465.Lundvall, B.A. (1999). National business systems and national systems of innovation, Int. Studies of Mgt. & Org., 29(2) : 60-77.Marshall, A. (1890). Principal of economics：An introductory volume, New York, Free Press.Markusen, A. (1996). Sticky places in slippery space, Economic Geography, 72(3) : 293-313.Mckendrick, D. G., Doner, R. F. and Haggard, S.(2000). From Silicon Valley to Singapore: Location and competitive advantages in the hard disk drive industry, Stanford: Stanford University.Miles, R., and Snow, C. (1992). Causes of failure in network organizations, California Management Review, 34(4) : 53-72. Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal, Regional Studies, 31(5) : 491-503.Nicholas, S., Purcell, W. and Gray, S. (2001). Regional clusters, location tournaments and incentives: An empirical analysis of factors attracting Japanese investment to Singapore, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18(3): 395-405.OECD. (1997). Globalization of research and development: A business viewpoint, Paris: OECD. Oerlemans, L. A. G. and Meeus, M. T. H. (2005). Do organizational and spatial proximity impact on firm performance, Regional Studies, 39(1) : 89-104.Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1991). Large firms in the production of the world`s technology an important case of non – globalization, Journal of International Business Studies, 22：1-21.Petrella, R. (1989). Globalization of technological innovation, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1(4): 393-407.Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations, London: Macmillan.Premus, R., Sanders, N. and Jain, R. K. (2003). Role of the university in regional economic development: The US experience, International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 2(4) : 369-383.Powell, W. W. (1987). Hybrid organizational qrrangements : New from transitional development, California Management Review, 67-87.Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance : Policy network, governance, reflexivity and accountability, Buckingham: Open University Press.Robertson, P. L. and Langlois, R. N. (1995). Innovation networks and vertical integration, Research Policy, 24(4): 543-562.Ronstadt, R. C. (1978). International R&D : The establishment and evolution of research and development abroad by seven U.S. multinationals, Journal of International Business Studies, 9 : 7-24.Root, F. B. (1994). Entry strategies for international markets, rev. and expanded, MA: Lexington Books.Serapio, M. G. and Dalton, D. H. (1999). Globalization of industrial R&D: An examination of foreign direct investments in R&D in the United States, Research Policy, 28: 303-316.Sigurdson, J. (2006). Technological superpower China, USA.Simmie, J. (2005). Innovation and space: a critical review of the literature, Regional Studies, 39(6): 789-804.Teece, D. J. (1996). Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 193-224. Stoker, G. (1998). Public-private partnership and urban governance, in Pierre, J.(ed.), Partnership in Urban Governance: European and AmericanExperience. London: Macmillan, pp.34-51.Storper, M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies, European Urban and Regional Studies, 2:191-222Tödtling, F. and Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach, Research Policy, 34：1203-1219.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2005). World investment report 2005: Transnational corporations and internationalization of R&D, Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35-67.Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the Product Cycle, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2) : 190-207.Weber, A. (1909). Theory of the location of industry, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Williamson, O. (1975). Market and hierarchy: Analysis and antitrust implications, New York: Free Press.Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism, New York: Free Press.Witt, U. (1997). Lock-in v.s. critical masses- industrial change under network externalities, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15:753-773.Yu, C. M. J. and Ito, K. (1988). Oligopolistic reaction and foreign direct investment: The case of the U.S. tire and textiles industries, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 449-460.Zejan, M. C. (1990). R&D activities in affiliates of Swedish multinational enterprises, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 92(3) : 487- 500.Zhang, K. H. (2001). What attracts foreign multinational corporations to China, Contemporary Economic Policy, 19(3) : 336-346.Zukin, S. and Dimaggio, P. (1990). Structures of capital: The social organization of the economy, Cambridge University Press. zh_TW
