| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This study aims to analyze the citing phenomenon of the doctoral dissertations written in 2001-2010 on the topic of history of Republic of China. Specific research questions include: the number and research subjects of dissertations; the number, form types, content types, core journals, half-life, languages, publication locations, repositories of cited literature.The findings are as follows. The most productive institute for the research of the R.O.C. history was National Chengchi University. Dissertations guided by two or more advisors account for 17%. The majority of research subjects of dissertations were social, political and cultural. Furthermore, the majority of sub-subjects of social research dissertations were social movements and women. The average citations of single dissertation were 317. The most cited form type of citations was Books (62.56%), followed by continuous publications (18.62%), and unpublished papers or manuscripts (9.50%). The most cited content type of cited books was monograph (54.67%), followed by compilation of historical materials and records (9.54%), and biographical materials (6.79%). The core journals about the R.O.C. history research were difficult to observe, because of the diversity of research topics and that single journal may largely cited by single dissertation. The half-life of cited books was 20.4 years, cited continuous publications was 25.02 year, and cited newspapers was 64.3 years. The main language of cited literature was Chinese (88.76%), followed by English (7.41%), and Japanese (3.71%). The main publication locations of cited Books were Taiwan and Mainland China, together accounting for 85.01%. The main repository of cited unpublished manuscripts and records were Academia Historica, followed by Archives, Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica, Kuomintang Party Records Archives, and Taiwan Historica. The suggestions of this study are as follows. Developing standard academic citation format in the field of history. Encouraging archives repositories to open manuscripts and records in multi-ways. Enhancing cooperation and resources integration of libraries and archives. Expanding the scope of citation analysis in the field of history. Investigating the behavior of historical researchers by qualitative research methods. | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、中文部分方美芬。「1979-2002 年中國大陸閩粵地區發表台灣文學論文文獻計量分 析」。東吳大學中國文學系，碩士論文，民93 年。王崇德。「文獻計量學」，中國大百科全書智慧藏。王晴佳。「臺灣史學的『變』與『不變』：1949─1999年」。臺大歷史學報 24期（民84年）：329-374。王晴佳。台灣史學50年：1950-2000傳承、方法、趨向。臺北市：麥田，民91年。何光國。文獻計量學導論。臺北市：三民書局，民83年。吳明德。「我國公立大學圖書館支援研究所學術研究之檢討」。沈寶環教授七秩華誕籌備委員會編。沈寶環教授七秩榮慶祝賀論文集。臺北市：臺灣學生書局，民78年。吳明德、黃文琪、陳世娟。「人文學者使用中文古籍全文資料庫之研究」。圖書資訊學刊4卷1/2期(民95年)：1-15。吳紹群。「臺灣地區人文學學術出版與學術傳播之研究」。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，博士論文，民99年。李東華。「一九四九年以後中華民國歷史學研究的發展」。中國論壇 21卷1期（民74年）：36-43。李少維。「台灣地區宋代理學學位論文引用文獻分析與特性研究：一九五八至一九九六年」。中國文化大學史學研究所，碩士論文，民87年。杜正勝。「新史學之路─兼論臺灣五十年來的史學發展」。新史學 13卷3期（民91年）：21-42。汪榮祖。「追尋半世紀的蹤跡：評王晴佳《臺灣史學50年，1950-2000：傳承、方法、趨向》」。中央研究院近代史研究所集刊，40卷（民92年）：241-248。林正珍、劉瑞寬。戰後臺灣的歷史學研究1945-2000：中國近現代史。臺北市：行政院國家科學委員會，民83年。林珊如、李郁雅。「從使用者觀點探討古文書及檔案之使用：以平埔研究人員為例」。大學圖書館3卷3期(民88年)：65-80林珊如。「建構支援台灣研究的數位圖書館：使用者研究的啟示」。圖書資訊學刊14期(民88年)：頁33-48。林滿紅。「當代臺灣的史學與社會」。教學與研究 18期（民88年）：69-98。邱均平。文獻計量學。北京：科學技術文獻，1988 年。國家圖書館。「臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統簡介」。2010年6月。 （2010年12月19日）。崔燕慧。「台灣地區近五年文史哲期刊論文引用文獻分析」。輔仁大學圖書館資訊學研究所，碩士論文，民87年。張力。「精確背後的模糊：與彭明輝教授商榷」。國立政治大學歷史學報 28期（民96年）：407-425。張玉法。中華民國史稿。臺北市：聯經，民87年。張玉法。「台海兩岸史學發展之異同（1949─1994）」。近代中國研究通訊 18期（民83年）：47-76。張樹華、張涵。「讀者研究」。中國大百科全書智慧藏。陳雅文。「國立臺灣大學工學院與文學院教師資訊尋求行為之調查研究」。國立臺灣大學圖書館學研究所，碩士論文，民79年。陳碧珠。「檔案館使用者之資訊行為研究：以中研院近史所檔案館為例」。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所，碩士論文，民91年。彭明輝。「臺灣地區歷史學研究的量化考察：以5種學術期刊為分析對象（1945-2000）」。漢學研究通訊 80期（民90年）：18-27。彭明輝。「臺灣地區歷史研究所博、碩士論文取向：一個計量史學的分析（1945-2000）」。台灣史學的中國纏結。臺北：麥田，民91年。彭明輝。「臺灣地區歷史學期刊論文與博、碩士論文的量化比較（1945-2000）」。漢學研究通訊 82期（民91年）：1-16。彭明輝。「從歷史學期刊論文分析台灣史學研究動向（1945-2000）」。國立政治大學歷史學報 19期（民91年）：335-364。彭明輝、唐志宏。「臺灣地區的中國近現代史研究：以學術期刊與博碩士論文為分析對象（1945-2000）」。國立政治大學歷史學報 20期（民92年）：375-425。彭明輝。「臺灣地區歷史學報的量化分析（1945-2000），上」。國立政治大學歷史學報 21期（民93年）：頁193-234。彭明輝。「臺灣地區歷史學報的量化分析（1945-2000），下」。國立政治大學歷史學報 22期（民93年），頁277-314。彭明輝。「臺灣地區歷史學的研究趨勢：以歷史學期刊為分析對象（1945- 2000）」。國立政治大學歷史學報 27期（民96年）：99-140。彭明輝。「臺灣官方歷史學期刊的研究取向（1945-2000）」。國立政治大學歷史學報 30期（民97年）：215-255。彭明輝。「臺灣歷史學期刊論文與歷史所博碩士論文的世界史研究（1945-2000）」。國立政治大學歷史學報 31期（民98年）：199-258。黃俊傑。「近十年來國內史學方法論的研究及其新動向：民國60年至民國70年（上）」。漢學研究通訊 2卷2期（民72年）：69-76。黃俊傑，「近十年來國內史學方法論的研究及其新動向：民國60年至民國70年（下）」。漢學研究通訊 2卷3期（民72年）：135-145。蔡明月。資訊計量學與文獻特性。臺北市：國立編譯館，民92年。鄭麗敏。「人文學者搜尋資訊行為的探究」。教育資料與圖書館學 29卷4期(民91年)：388-410。嚴鼎忠。「使用者研究」。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。臺北市：漢美，民84年。盧秀菊。「西洋人文學參考資料與服務初探」。圖書館學刊 11期(民85年)：1-21。 二、英文部分Barrett , Andy. “ The Information-Seeking Habits of Graduate Student Researchers in the Humanities.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 31: 4( 2005): 324-331.Brooks, Terrence A. “Evidence of Complex Citer Motivations.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37:1(1986):34-36.Budd, John. “A Citation Study of American Literature: Implications for Collection Management.” Colleciton Management 8:2 (Summer 1986): 49-62.Cano , V. “ Citation behavior: Classification, utility, and location. ” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40:4 (1989):284–290.Case, Donald O. and Higgins, Georgeann M. “How Can We Investigate Citation Behavior? A Study of Reasons for Citing Literature in Communication.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51:7(2000):635-645.Chubin, Daryl E. and Moitra, Soumyo D. “Content analysis of references: Adjunctor alternative to citation counting?” Social Studies of Science 5 (1975):423–441.Cullars, John M. “Citation Characteristics of Italian and Spanish Literary Monographs.” Library Quarterly 60:4 (1990): 337-356.Cullars, John M. “Citation characteristics of monographs in the fine arts.” Library Quarterly 62:3 (1992): 325-342.Cullars, John M. “Citation characteristics of French and German fine arts monographs.” Library Quarterly 66:2 (1996):138–160.Cullars, John M. “Citation characteristics of English-language monographs in philosophy.” Library and Information Science Research 20: 1(1998):41-68.Dalton , Margaret Stieg and Charnigo, Laurie. “ CharnigoHistorians and their information sources.” College and Research Libraries 65:5 (2004):400-425.Delgadillo , Roberto and Lynch, Beverly P. “Future Historians: Their Quest for Information.” College and Research Libraries 60:3 (1999):245-259. Duncan,E. B., Anderson, F. D., and McAleese, R. “ Qualified citation indexing: Its relevance to educational technology.” In: E. B. Duncan and R. McAleese Eds., Information retrieval in educational technology. Aberdeen, Scotland: University of Aberdeen, 1981. (Proceedings of the First Symposium on Information Retrieval in Educational Technology, April 1, 1981, Aberdeen.)Elliott, Clark A. “Citation Patterns and Documentation for the History of Science: Some Methodological Considerations.” The American Archivist 44:2 (1981):131-142.Frost, Carolyn O. “The Use of Citation in Literary Research: A Preliminary Classification of Citation Functions.” Library Quarterly 49:4 (1979): 399-414.Garfield, Eugene “Can Citation Indexing Be Automated?” In: Mary E. Stevens, et al. eds., Statistical Association Methods for Mechanized Documentation (NBS Misc. Pub. 269) Washington D.C.: National Bureau of Standards, 1965.Heinzkill, Richard. “Characteristics of References in Selected Scholarly English Literary Journals.” Library Quarterly 50:3(1980):352-365.Heinzkill, Richard. “References in Scholarly English and American Literary Journals Thirty Years Later: A Citation Study.” College and Research Linraries 68:2 (2007):141-154.Herubel , Jean-Pierre V. M. and Buchanan, Anne L. “Citation Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences: A Selective and Annotated Bibliography.” Collection Management 18:3/4 (1994):89-137.Jones, Clyve, Chapman, Michael, and Woods, Pamela Carr. “The Characteristics of the Literature Used by Historians.” Journal of Librarianship 4:3 (1972):137-156.MacRoberts , Michael H. and MacRoberts, Barbara R. “Problems of Citation Analysis: A Critical Review.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40:5 (1989): 342-349.McAnally, Arthur M. “Characteristics of Materials Used in Research in United States History,” University of Chicago, Graduate Library School, Ph.D. Diss., 1951. 轉引自Elliott, Clark A. “Citation Patterns and Documentation for the History of Science: Some Methodological Considerations.” The American Archivist 44:2 (1981): 133。Megill, Allan. “The Reception of Foucault by Historians.” Journal of the History of Ideas 48:1 (1987): 117-141.Merton, Robert K. “ Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science.” American Sociological Review 22:6 (1957):635–659.Merton, Robert K. “ The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.” Science 159:3810 (1968): 56–63.Miller, Fredric. “Use, Appraisal and Research: A Case Study of Social History.” American Archivist 49:4(1986):371-392.Murugesan , Poovanalingam and Moravcsik, Michael J. “Variation of the nature of citation measures with journals and scientific specialties. ” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 29:3 (1978):141-147.Nicolaisen, Jeppe. “Citation Analysis.” In Blaise Cronin ed. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 41. Washington: American Society for Information Science, 2007.Shadish, William R., Tolliver, Donna, Gray,Maria, and Gupta, Sunil K. Sen “Author judgments about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals. ” Social Studies of Science 25 (1995): 477–498.Smith, Linda C. “Citation Analysis.” Library Trends 30:1 (1981):83-106.Snyder , Herbert W. and Bonzi, Susan. "An Enquiry into the Behavior of Author Self Citation." In: J. Katzer and G. Newby Eds., Managing Information and Technology. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science. Medford, New Jersey: Learned Information, Inc., 1989.Stieg , Margaret F. “The Information of Needs of Historians.” College and Research Libraries 42:6 (1981): 549-60. | zh_TW |
