1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 傳播學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 誰是我的朋友？Z世代青少兒之社交關係初探
Who is my friend? --The social relationship of Generation Z.
作者 陳彥榕
貢獻者 吳筱玫
陳彥榕
關鍵詞 Z世代青少兒
社交關係
友誼
童年場域
日期 2010
上傳時間 5-九月-2013 14:31:52 (UTC+8)
摘要 近年來，隨著網路溝通工具與網路社群服務等的蓬勃發展，誕生了一批悠遊於網路與真實世界所鑲嵌之社交網絡的「Z世代青少兒」。「Z世代」為1998年以後出生的青少兒，此一世代極早接觸網際網路，其童年成長與即時通訊軟體、部落格、社群網站等網路服務的發展同步，並經常使用該網路服務來滿足社交需求。然而，關於Z世代青少兒在網路上所建立與維繫之社交關係的相關研究卻稍嫌不足，即便有，研究者也大多持負面觀點看待該社交關係，致使許多家長與關心青少兒的組織團體，僅只干預或限制青少兒在網路上的社交活動，卻無法理解這些網路社交活動對於Z世代青少兒在擴展與維繫社交關係上的意義。

本研究透過十名受訪青少兒的口述、圖畫以及網路示範，知悉其在網路與真實世界互嵌網絡的各種社交空間之流動情形，以及其所進行的社交內容與活動，再進一步探討其間所發展的社交關係。研究分析則參照Alanen的童年場域分類，說明Z世代青少兒對社交關係的認知、界定以及轉變，而針對該社交關係的轉變情形，則參照關係辯證理論，描繪轉變其間的動態與考量。

研究結果發現，首先，Z世代青少兒對於友誼關係抱持較開放的定義，不受限於以往的社交網絡群分類，認為無論社交對象來自「家庭」、「學校」或是「個人興趣」等場域，若彼此擁有較高的社交內容與活動的多元性與密集度，即可能將該社交對象視為「朋友」。其次，透過即時通訊軟體、部落格、社群網站等網路服務的使用，Z世代青少兒與社交對象得以進入彼此更多的社交空間，雙方進而擁有更多共享的關心議題以及共同參與的活動，即增進彼此社交內容與活動的多元性與密集度。

最後，研究也發現，Z世代青少兒與社交對象是否進入彼此的多種社交空間，以及是否參與雙方之社交內容與活動的意願與程度，乃依據彼此過去和現在的互動情形，以及對於各種網路服務所提供的社交空間之認知不同而有差異。因此，本研究以為，隨著網路溝通工具與網路社群服務等進入Z世代青少兒的生活，其社交關係的認知與界定有了轉變，無論是在「家庭」、「學校」或是「個人興趣」等場域，皆有可能與其中的社交對象發展「友誼」關係，而該友誼關係也受雙方的互動情形與對各種社交空間的認知差異所影響，呈現不斷轉變的動態過程。
參考文獻 中文文獻

王雲東(2007)。《社會研究方法：量化與質性取向與應用》。新北市：威仕曼文化。

王瑞賢譯(2009)。《童年與社會：兒童社會學導論》，台北：心理出版社。(原書 Wyness, M. [2006]. Childhood and society: An introduction to the sociology of childhood. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan )

呂欣怡(2006)。《國小學童網路人際關係與現實人際關係之相關研究》。新竹教育大學人資處輔導教學碩士班論文。

呂翠夏譯(2002)。《兒童的社會發展：策略與活動》，台北：桂冠。(原書Smith, C. A. [2001]. Promoting the social development of young children: Strategies and activities. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.)

沈孟燕(2009)。《親情Online：網路媒介與家庭溝通型態之相關研究》。政治大學新聞學研究所碩士論文。

李黃寶(2009)。《國小高年級學童線上遊戲玩家行為與人際關係、自我概念關係之研究：以臺北市為例》。政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班碩士論文。

林宇玲(2008)。《兒童與網路：從批判角度探討偏遠地區兒童網路使用》。台北：威秀資訊科技。

林唯斯(2007)。《國中生網路成癮、人格特質與人際關係之研究：以瑞芳附近地區為例》。銘傳大學教育研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。

馬振剛(2007)。《網路世代學童之價值觀與網路社會化學習機制之關聯性分析：以大台北地區國小五六年級學童為例》。政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文。

許怡安(2001)。《兒童網路使用與網路媒體素養之研究：以台北縣國小高年級學童為例》。政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文。

許淑惠(2006)。《國小六年級學童網路使用行為，家庭相關因素與網路成癮之研究》。靜宜大學管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。

陳介英(2005)。《深度訪談在經驗研究的反思》。齊力、林本炫編：《質性研究方法與資料分析》。嘉義：南華大學教育社會學研究所。

陳向明(2009)。《社會科學質的研究》。台北：五南。

陳俊宏(2005)。《中台灣青少兒媒體使用與網路安全素養探討》。政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文。

陳俞霖(2003)。《網路同儕對N世代青少年的意義：認同感的追尋》。高雄市：復文。

陶慧娟(2004)。《網路交友互動分析：網路人際關係的虛幻與真實》。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。

黃葳威(2009)。〈2009兒童網路安全趨勢報告〉。上網日期：2010年9月17日，取自：http://www.rtv.nccu.edu.tw/vhuang/cap/37/37.html#2.

張盈堃譯(2008)。《兒童的田野工作》，台北：心裡出版社。(原書Holmes, R. M. [1998]. Fieldwork with children. Sage Publications.)

蔡佳燕(2009)。《台灣兒童遊戲的發展及轉變：透過不同世代童年遊戲的探討》。嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。

鄭英瑋(2004)。《網路使用對青少年生活適應之影響研究》。暨南大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文。

劉蕙如(2004)。《台北市在學青少年網路使用動機、使用行為與幸福感之研究》。中國文化大學心理輔導研究所碩士論文。

樊誌融(2005)。《兒童網路性別態度與社會化歷程探討》。政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文。

台灣網路資訊中心(2010)。〈台灣網路使用調查〉。上網日期：2010年9月17日，取自：http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/1007c.pdf.

富邦文教基金會(2009)。〈2009全國兒童媒體使用行為調查報告〉。上網日期2010年8月22日，取自：http://www.fubonedu.org.tw/download/2009%E5%85%A8%E5%9C%8B%E5%85%92%E7%AB%A5%E5%AA%92%E9%AB%94%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E8%A1%8C%E7%82%BA%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A-%E5%AE%8C%E6%95%B4%E5%85%A7%E5%AE%B9.pdf.

TWNIC (2010)。〈2010年台灣寬頻網路使用狀況調查〉。上網日期2010年9月17日，取自：http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/1001b.pdf.

英文文獻
Alanen, L. (2000). Childhood as generational condition. Research in childhood: Sociology, culture and history. Denmark: University of Southern Denmark.

Ayres, J. (1983). Strategies to maintain relationships: Their identification and perceived usage. Communication Quartely, 31, 62-67.

Bartholomew, K. & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 61, 226-244.
Baxter, L. A. (1990). Dialectical contradictions in relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 7, 69-88.

Baxter, L. A., & Dindia, K. (1990). Marital partners perceptions of marital maintenance and repair strategies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 7, 187-208.

Baxter, L. A., Mazanec, M., Nicholson, J., Pittman, G., Smith, K., & West, L. (1997). Everyday loyalties and betrayals in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 14, 655-678.

Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guildford.

Baym, N. K., & Lin, M. C. (2004). Social interactions across media. New Media & Society, 6(3), 299-318.

Bell, R. A., Daly, J. A., & Gonzalez, C. (1987). Affinity-maintenance in marirage and its relationship to women’s marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 445-454.

Berger, C.R., Weber, M. D., Munley, M. E.& Dixon, J.T. (1977). Interpersonal relationship levels and interpersonal attraction. In B. Rubin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 1 (pp. 245-262). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

Blieszner , R. & Adams, R. G. (1992). Adult friendship. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Boase, J., Horrigan, J., Wellman, B., & Rainie, L. (2006). The strength of internet ties. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.

boyd, d. (2006). Friends, friendsters, and top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11(12), URL (consulted 17 September 2010): http://www.danah.org/papers/FriendsFriendsterTop8.pdf.

Brandtzæg, P. B., Staksrud, E., Hagen, I., & Wold, T. (2009). Norwegian children`s experiences of cyberbullying when using different technological platforms. Journal of Children & Media, 3(4), 349-365.

Brannan, J., & O’Brien, M. (1996). Children and families: Research and policy. London: Falmer Press.

Briggle, A. (2008). Real friends: How the Internet can foster friendship. Ethics and Information Technology, 10, 71-79.

Buckingham, D. (2002). The electronic generation? Children and new media. In L. A. Lievrouw (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 77-89). London: Sage.

Buckingham, D. (2008). Youth, identity, and digital media. London: The MIT Press.

Buhrmester, D., & Prager, K. (1995). Patterns and functions of self-disclosure during childhood and adolescence. In K. J. Rotenberg (Ed.), Disclosure processes in children and adolescents (pp. 10-56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burleson, B. R. (1994). Friendship and similarities in social-cognitive and communication abilities: Social skill bases of interpersonal attraction in childhood. Personal Relationship, 1, 371-389.

Burleson, B. R., & Samter, W. (1994). A social skills approach to relationship maintenance: How individual differences in communication skills affect the achievement of relationship functions. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 61-90). New York: Academic Press.

Buunk, B. P., & Prins, K. S. (1998). Lonliness, exchange orientation, and reciprocity in friendships. Personal Relationships, 5, 1-14.

Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (1994). Strategic and routine interaction. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 3-22). San Diego, CA: Academic.

Canary, D. J., Stafford, L., Hause, K.S. & Wallace, L. A. (1993). An inductive analysis of relational maintenance strategies: Comparisons among lovers, relatives, friends, and others. Communication Research Reports, 10, 5-14.

Canary, D. J. & Zelley, E. D. (2000). Current research programs on relational maintenance behaviors. Communication Yearbook, 23, 305-339.

Carter, D., (2005). Living in virtual communities: An ethnography of human relationships in cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 148–167.

Cohen, J. E. (2007). Cyberspace as/ and space. Columbia Law Review, 107, 210-256.

Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644-663.

Conville, R. L. & Rogers, L. E. (1998). The meaning of relationship in interpersonal communication. London: Praeger.

Corsaro, W. A. (2005). The sociology of childhood. London: Pine Forge Press.

Davis, M. S. (1973). Intimate relations. New York: Free Press.

Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Dindia, K., & Canary, D. J. (1993). Definitions and theoratical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 10, 163-173.

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘Friends’: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12(4), URL (consulted 17 September 2010): http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html.

Erikson, E. H. (1986). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.

Evaldsson, A. C. & Corsaro, W. A. (1998). Play and games in the peer cultures of preschool and the preadolescent children. Childhood, 5(4), 337-402.

Farrington, J. (2007). Online friendship: how they touch your real-life world. Current Health 2, A Weekly Reader Publication, 33, 20-24.

Fehr, B. (1996). Friendship processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fehr, B. (2000). The life cycle of friendship. In Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A source book (pp. 71-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Frones, I. (1994). Dimensions of childhood. In Qvortrup, J., et al. (Eds.), Childhood matters. Vienna: Avebury.

Froomkin, A. M. (2003). Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace. Harvard Law Review, 116(3), URL (consulted 17 September 2010): http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=363840.

Gefter, A. (2006). ‘This is your space,’ New Scientist, 191(2569), 46-48.

Gennaro, C., & Dutton, W. (2007). Reconfiguring friendships: Social relationships and the internet. Information, Communication & Society,10(5), 591–618.

Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.

Harris, J. R. (2000). Parents have no lasting influence on the personality or intelligence of their children. In Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., Bem, D. J. & Sussan, N. H. (Eds.) Hilgards’ introduction to psychology 13TH ed. TX: Harcourt Brace.

Hays, R. B. (1988). Friendships. In S. W. Duck (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (pp. 391-408). Chichester: Wiley.

Henoré, C. (2008). Under pressure: Rescuing our children from the culture of hyper-parenting. London: Orion.


Holloway, S. L. & Valentine, G. (2003). Cyberkids: Children in the information age. New York: Routledge.

James, A. L. & James, A. (2004). Constructing childhood: Theory, policy, and social practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (2006). Theorizing childhood. Cambridge: Polity.

Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotoma, R., Robison, A., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago: Macarthur Foundation.

Jenks, C. (2004). Constructing childhood sociologically. In M. J. Kehily (Eds.), An introduction to childhood studies (pp. 77-95). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

Johnson, J. (2002). In-depth interviewing. In Gubrium, J. & Holstein, J. (Eds.) Handbook of interview research: context and method (pp.103-119). London: Sage Publication.

Kerns, K. A. (1994). A longitudinal examination of links between mother-child attachment and children’s friendships in early childhood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 11, 379-381.

Lewis, J. & West, A. (2009). `Friending`: London-based undergraduates` experience of Facebook. New Media Society, 11(7), 1209-1229.

McCarty, C. (2002). Structure in personal networks. Journal of Social Structure 3(1), URL (consulted 17 September 2010): http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume3/McCarty.html.

McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2002). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.

Mesch, G. & Levanon, Y. (2003). Community networking and locally-based social ties in two suburban localities. City and Community, 2(4), 335–351.

Mesch, G. & Talmud, I. (2006). The quality of online and offline relationships: The Role of multiplexity and duration of social relationships. The Information Society, 22, 137–148.

Messman, S. J., Canary, D. J., & Hause, K. S. (2000). Motives to remain platonic, equity, and the use of maintenance strategies in opposite-sex frienships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 17, 67-94.

Montgomery, B. M. (1993). Relationship maintenance versus relationship change: Dialectical dilemma. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 205-224.

Mouritsen, F. (1998). Child Culture - Play Culture. In Guldberg, J. & Mouritsen, F. (Eds.) Child and Youth Culture. Denmark: Odense University.
Pataki, S. P., Shapiro, C., & Clark, M. S. (1994). Children’s acquisition of appropriate norms for friendships and acquaintances. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 11, 427-442.

Plowman, L., Stephen, C. & McPake, J. (2010). Growing up with technology: Young children learning in a digital world. New York: Routledge.

Rawlins, W. K. (1992). Friendship matters: Communication, dialectic, and the lifecourse. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

Rawlins, W. K. (1994). Being and growing apart: Sustaining friendships during adulthood. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 275-294). New York: Academic Press.

Rawlins, W. K. (2000). Teaching as a Mode of Friendship. Communication Theory, 10(1), 5-26.

Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteding on the electronic frontier, URL (consulted 17 September 2010): http://www.planetfreebook.com/Classic_collection/classic_books_author_R_PDF_edited_filenames/Rheingold.Howard%20!The%20Virtual%20Community.pdf.

Rice, R. E., Sheperd, A., Dutton, W. H. & Katz, J. E. (2007). Social interaction and the internet: a comparative analysis of surveys in the US and Britain. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes & U. R. Reips (Eds.), Oxford handbooks of internet psychology (pp. 7-30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rusbult, C. E. & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationship: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 10, 175-204.

Shulman, S., Elicker, J., & Sroufe, L. A. (1994). Stages of friendship growth in preadolescence as related to attachment history. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 11, 341-361.

Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relatioship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 8, 217-242.

Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of psychology, 52, 83-110.

Tang, L. (2010). Development of online friendship in different social spaces. Information, Communication & Society, 13(4), 615-633.

Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Tapscott, D. (2009). Growing up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Tolhuizen, J. H. (1989). Affinity-seeking in developing relationships. Communication Reports, 2, 83-91.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). The effects of instant messaging on the quality of adolescents’ existing friendships: A longitudinal study. Journal of Communication, 59, 79–97.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Weiss, R. S. (1998). A taxonomy of relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 15, 671-683.

Wilkinson, H. (1995). ‘Take care in cyberspace,’ The Independence, 1 December, URL (consulted 17 September 2010): http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/take-care-in-cyberspace-children-1523488.html.

Wright, P. H. (1984). Self-referent motivation and the intrinsic quality of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 1, 115-130.

Wright, P. H. (1998). Towards an expanded orientation to the study of sex differnces in friendship. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 41-64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
新聞研究所
97451003
99
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097451003
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳筱玫zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 陳彥榕zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 陳彥榕zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 5-九月-2013 14:31:52 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 5-九月-2013 14:31:52 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-九月-2013 14:31:52 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0097451003en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60369-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 新聞研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97451003zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 近年來，隨著網路溝通工具與網路社群服務等的蓬勃發展，誕生了一批悠遊於網路與真實世界所鑲嵌之社交網絡的「Z世代青少兒」。「Z世代」為1998年以後出生的青少兒，此一世代極早接觸網際網路，其童年成長與即時通訊軟體、部落格、社群網站等網路服務的發展同步，並經常使用該網路服務來滿足社交需求。然而，關於Z世代青少兒在網路上所建立與維繫之社交關係的相關研究卻稍嫌不足，即便有，研究者也大多持負面觀點看待該社交關係，致使許多家長與關心青少兒的組織團體，僅只干預或限制青少兒在網路上的社交活動，卻無法理解這些網路社交活動對於Z世代青少兒在擴展與維繫社交關係上的意義。

本研究透過十名受訪青少兒的口述、圖畫以及網路示範，知悉其在網路與真實世界互嵌網絡的各種社交空間之流動情形，以及其所進行的社交內容與活動，再進一步探討其間所發展的社交關係。研究分析則參照Alanen的童年場域分類，說明Z世代青少兒對社交關係的認知、界定以及轉變，而針對該社交關係的轉變情形，則參照關係辯證理論，描繪轉變其間的動態與考量。

研究結果發現，首先，Z世代青少兒對於友誼關係抱持較開放的定義，不受限於以往的社交網絡群分類，認為無論社交對象來自「家庭」、「學校」或是「個人興趣」等場域，若彼此擁有較高的社交內容與活動的多元性與密集度，即可能將該社交對象視為「朋友」。其次，透過即時通訊軟體、部落格、社群網站等網路服務的使用，Z世代青少兒與社交對象得以進入彼此更多的社交空間，雙方進而擁有更多共享的關心議題以及共同參與的活動，即增進彼此社交內容與活動的多元性與密集度。

最後，研究也發現，Z世代青少兒與社交對象是否進入彼此的多種社交空間，以及是否參與雙方之社交內容與活動的意願與程度，乃依據彼此過去和現在的互動情形，以及對於各種網路服務所提供的社交空間之認知不同而有差異。因此，本研究以為，隨著網路溝通工具與網路社群服務等進入Z世代青少兒的生活，其社交關係的認知與界定有了轉變，無論是在「家庭」、「學校」或是「個人興趣」等場域，皆有可能與其中的社交對象發展「友誼」關係，而該友誼關係也受雙方的互動情形與對各種社交空間的認知差異所影響，呈現不斷轉變的動態過程。		zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機與目的 2

第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 網路世代兒童 5
壹 兒童與童年研究 5
貳 兒童與成人文化 6
參 童年場域與兒童社交關係 7
第二節 關係與友誼關係發展 8
壹 關係發展與維持策略 8
貳 友誼關係發展與維持策略 9
參 兒童與友誼關係 14
第三節 網路與社交網絡 15
壹 網路與真實世界 15
貳 網路與社交/友誼關係 17
第四節 小結與研究問題 21

第三章 研究方法 23
第一節 研究設計 23
第二節 研究對象 24

第四章 研究結果 26
第一節 Z世代青少兒的「家庭場域」……………………………………………26
壹 Z世代青少兒與家庭成員 26
貳 「家庭成員」與「朋友」─界線的模糊與涇渭分明 35
第二節 Z世代青少兒的「學校場域」……………………………………………42
壹 Z世代青少兒與學校老師 43
貳 Z世代青少兒與學校同學 50
第三節 Z世代青少兒的「個人興趣場域」………………………………………60
壹 遊蕩─建立並維持同伴關係 61
貳 獨立或依賴的同伴關係─「網友」與「朋友」 65
第四節 再探Z世代青少兒的「友誼場域」……………………………………70

第五章 結論 78
第一節 Z世代青少兒的社交關係………………………………………………78
壹 Z世代青少兒的「家庭場域」 80
貳 Z世代青少兒的「學校場域」 80
參 Z世代青少兒的「個人興趣場域」 81
肆 「友誼」在其他場域的生成與消長 81
第二節 研究限制與建議 ………………………………………………………82

參考文獻 84
附錄─訪談大綱 92

圖表目錄
受訪者基本資料表 25
研究結果概念圖 77		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1609799 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097451003en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Z世代青少兒zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社交關係zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 友誼zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 童年場域zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 誰是我的朋友？Z世代青少兒之社交關係初探zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Who is my friend? --The social relationship of Generation Z.en_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻

王雲東(2007)。《社會研究方法：量化與質性取向與應用》。新北市：威仕曼文化。

王瑞賢譯(2009)。《童年與社會：兒童社會學導論》，台北：心理出版社。(原書 Wyness, M. [2006]. Childhood and society: An introduction to the sociology of childhood. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan )

呂欣怡(2006)。《國小學童網路人際關係與現實人際關係之相關研究》。新竹教育大學人資處輔導教學碩士班論文。

呂翠夏譯(2002)。《兒童的社會發展：策略與活動》，台北：桂冠。(原書Smith, C. A. [2001]. Promoting the social development of young children: Strategies and activities. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.)

沈孟燕(2009)。《親情Online：網路媒介與家庭溝通型態之相關研究》。政治大學新聞學研究所碩士論文。

李黃寶(2009)。《國小高年級學童線上遊戲玩家行為與人際關係、自我概念關係之研究：以臺北市為例》。政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班碩士論文。

林宇玲(2008)。《兒童與網路：從批判角度探討偏遠地區兒童網路使用》。台北：威秀資訊科技。

林唯斯(2007)。《國中生網路成癮、人格特質與人際關係之研究：以瑞芳附近地區為例》。銘傳大學教育研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。

馬振剛(2007)。《網路世代學童之價值觀與網路社會化學習機制之關聯性分析：以大台北地區國小五六年級學童為例》。政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文。

許怡安(2001)。《兒童網路使用與網路媒體素養之研究：以台北縣國小高年級學童為例》。政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文。

許淑惠(2006)。《國小六年級學童網路使用行為，家庭相關因素與網路成癮之研究》。靜宜大學管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。

陳介英(2005)。《深度訪談在經驗研究的反思》。齊力、林本炫編：《質性研究方法與資料分析》。嘉義：南華大學教育社會學研究所。

陳向明(2009)。《社會科學質的研究》。台北：五南。

陳俊宏(2005)。《中台灣青少兒媒體使用與網路安全素養探討》。政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文。

陳俞霖(2003)。《網路同儕對N世代青少年的意義：認同感的追尋》。高雄市：復文。

陶慧娟(2004)。《網路交友互動分析：網路人際關係的虛幻與真實》。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。

黃葳威(2009)。〈2009兒童網路安全趨勢報告〉。上網日期：2010年9月17日，取自：http://www.rtv.nccu.edu.tw/vhuang/cap/37/37.html#2.

張盈堃譯(2008)。《兒童的田野工作》，台北：心裡出版社。(原書Holmes, R. M. [1998]. Fieldwork with children. Sage Publications.)

蔡佳燕(2009)。《台灣兒童遊戲的發展及轉變：透過不同世代童年遊戲的探討》。嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。

鄭英瑋(2004)。《網路使用對青少年生活適應之影響研究》。暨南大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文。

劉蕙如(2004)。《台北市在學青少年網路使用動機、使用行為與幸福感之研究》。中國文化大學心理輔導研究所碩士論文。

樊誌融(2005)。《兒童網路性別態度與社會化歷程探討》。政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文。

台灣網路資訊中心(2010)。〈台灣網路使用調查〉。上網日期：2010年9月17日，取自：http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/1007c.pdf.

富邦文教基金會(2009)。〈2009全國兒童媒體使用行為調查報告〉。上網日期2010年8月22日，取自：http://www.fubonedu.org.tw/download/2009%E5%85%A8%E5%9C%8B%E5%85%92%E7%AB%A5%E5%AA%92%E9%AB%94%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E8%A1%8C%E7%82%BA%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A-%E5%AE%8C%E6%95%B4%E5%85%A7%E5%AE%B9.pdf.

TWNIC (2010)。〈2010年台灣寬頻網路使用狀況調查〉。上網日期2010年9月17日，取自：http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/1001b.pdf.

英文文獻
Alanen, L. (2000). Childhood as generational condition. Research in childhood: Sociology, culture and history. Denmark: University of Southern Denmark.

Ayres, J. (1983). Strategies to maintain relationships: Their identification and perceived usage. Communication Quartely, 31, 62-67.

Bartholomew, K. & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 61, 226-244.
Baxter, L. A. (1990). Dialectical contradictions in relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 7, 69-88.

Baxter, L. A., & Dindia, K. (1990). Marital partners perceptions of marital maintenance and repair strategies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 7, 187-208.

Baxter, L. A., Mazanec, M., Nicholson, J., Pittman, G., Smith, K., & West, L. (1997). Everyday loyalties and betrayals in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 14, 655-678.

Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guildford.

Baym, N. K., & Lin, M. C. (2004). Social interactions across media. New Media & Society, 6(3), 299-318.

Bell, R. A., Daly, J. A., & Gonzalez, C. (1987). Affinity-maintenance in marirage and its relationship to women’s marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 445-454.

Berger, C.R., Weber, M. D., Munley, M. E.& Dixon, J.T. (1977). Interpersonal relationship levels and interpersonal attraction. In B. Rubin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 1 (pp. 245-262). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

Blieszner , R. & Adams, R. G. (1992). Adult friendship. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Boase, J., Horrigan, J., Wellman, B., & Rainie, L. (2006). The strength of internet ties. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.

boyd, d. (2006). Friends, friendsters, and top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11(12), URL (consulted 17 September 2010): http://www.danah.org/papers/FriendsFriendsterTop8.pdf.

Brandtzæg, P. B., Staksrud, E., Hagen, I., & Wold, T. (2009). Norwegian children`s experiences of cyberbullying when using different technological platforms. Journal of Children & Media, 3(4), 349-365.

Brannan, J., & O’Brien, M. (1996). Children and families: Research and policy. London: Falmer Press.

Briggle, A. (2008). Real friends: How the Internet can foster friendship. Ethics and Information Technology, 10, 71-79.

Buckingham, D. (2002). The electronic generation? Children and new media. In L. A. Lievrouw (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 77-89). London: Sage.

Buckingham, D. (2008). Youth, identity, and digital media. London: The MIT Press.

Buhrmester, D., & Prager, K. (1995). Patterns and functions of self-disclosure during childhood and adolescence. In K. J. Rotenberg (Ed.), Disclosure processes in children and adolescents (pp. 10-56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burleson, B. R. (1994). Friendship and similarities in social-cognitive and communication abilities: Social skill bases of interpersonal attraction in childhood. Personal Relationship, 1, 371-389.

Burleson, B. R., & Samter, W. (1994). A social skills approach to relationship maintenance: How individual differences in communication skills affect the achievement of relationship functions. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 61-90). New York: Academic Press.

Buunk, B. P., & Prins, K. S. (1998). Lonliness, exchange orientation, and reciprocity in friendships. Personal Relationships, 5, 1-14.

Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (1994). Strategic and routine interaction. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 3-22). San Diego, CA: Academic.

Canary, D. J., Stafford, L., Hause, K.S. & Wallace, L. A. (1993). An inductive analysis of relational maintenance strategies: Comparisons among lovers, relatives, friends, and others. Communication Research Reports, 10, 5-14.

Canary, D. J. & Zelley, E. D. (2000). Current research programs on relational maintenance behaviors. Communication Yearbook, 23, 305-339.

Carter, D., (2005). Living in virtual communities: An ethnography of human relationships in cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 148–167.

Cohen, J. E. (2007). Cyberspace as/ and space. Columbia Law Review, 107, 210-256.

Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644-663.

Conville, R. L. & Rogers, L. E. (1998). The meaning of relationship in interpersonal communication. London: Praeger.

Corsaro, W. A. (2005). The sociology of childhood. London: Pine Forge Press.

Davis, M. S. (1973). Intimate relations. New York: Free Press.

Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Dindia, K., & Canary, D. J. (1993). Definitions and theoratical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 10, 163-173.

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘Friends’: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12(4), URL (consulted 17 September 2010): http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html.

Erikson, E. H. (1986). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.

Evaldsson, A. C. & Corsaro, W. A. (1998). Play and games in the peer cultures of preschool and the preadolescent children. Childhood, 5(4), 337-402.

Farrington, J. (2007). Online friendship: how they touch your real-life world. Current Health 2, A Weekly Reader Publication, 33, 20-24.

Fehr, B. (1996). Friendship processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fehr, B. (2000). The life cycle of friendship. In Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A source book (pp. 71-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Frones, I. (1994). Dimensions of childhood. In Qvortrup, J., et al. (Eds.), Childhood matters. Vienna: Avebury.

Froomkin, A. M. (2003). Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace. Harvard Law Review, 116(3), URL (consulted 17 September 2010): http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=363840.

Gefter, A. (2006). ‘This is your space,’ New Scientist, 191(2569), 46-48.

Gennaro, C., & Dutton, W. (2007). Reconfiguring friendships: Social relationships and the internet. Information, Communication & Society,10(5), 591–618.

Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.

Harris, J. R. (2000). Parents have no lasting influence on the personality or intelligence of their children. In Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., Bem, D. J. & Sussan, N. H. (Eds.) Hilgards’ introduction to psychology 13TH ed. TX: Harcourt Brace.

Hays, R. B. (1988). Friendships. In S. W. Duck (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (pp. 391-408). Chichester: Wiley.

Henoré, C. (2008). Under pressure: Rescuing our children from the culture of hyper-parenting. London: Orion.


Holloway, S. L. & Valentine, G. (2003). Cyberkids: Children in the information age. New York: Routledge.

James, A. L. & James, A. (2004). Constructing childhood: Theory, policy, and social practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (2006). Theorizing childhood. Cambridge: Polity.

Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotoma, R., Robison, A., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago: Macarthur Foundation.

Jenks, C. (2004). Constructing childhood sociologically. In M. J. Kehily (Eds.), An introduction to childhood studies (pp. 77-95). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

Johnson, J. (2002). In-depth interviewing. In Gubrium, J. & Holstein, J. (Eds.) Handbook of interview research: context and method (pp.103-119). London: Sage Publication.

Kerns, K. A. (1994). A longitudinal examination of links between mother-child attachment and children’s friendships in early childhood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 11, 379-381.

Lewis, J. & West, A. (2009). `Friending`: London-based undergraduates` experience of Facebook. New Media Society, 11(7), 1209-1229.

McCarty, C. (2002). Structure in personal networks. Journal of Social Structure 3(1), URL (consulted 17 September 2010): http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume3/McCarty.html.

McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2002). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.

Mesch, G. & Levanon, Y. (2003). Community networking and locally-based social ties in two suburban localities. City and Community, 2(4), 335–351.

Mesch, G. & Talmud, I. (2006). The quality of online and offline relationships: The Role of multiplexity and duration of social relationships. The Information Society, 22, 137–148.

Messman, S. J., Canary, D. J., & Hause, K. S. (2000). Motives to remain platonic, equity, and the use of maintenance strategies in opposite-sex frienships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 17, 67-94.

Montgomery, B. M. (1993). Relationship maintenance versus relationship change: Dialectical dilemma. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 205-224.

Mouritsen, F. (1998). Child Culture - Play Culture. In Guldberg, J. & Mouritsen, F. (Eds.) Child and Youth Culture. Denmark: Odense University.
Pataki, S. P., Shapiro, C., & Clark, M. S. (1994). Children’s acquisition of appropriate norms for friendships and acquaintances. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 11, 427-442.

Plowman, L., Stephen, C. & McPake, J. (2010). Growing up with technology: Young children learning in a digital world. New York: Routledge.

Rawlins, W. K. (1992). Friendship matters: Communication, dialectic, and the lifecourse. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

Rawlins, W. K. (1994). Being and growing apart: Sustaining friendships during adulthood. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 275-294). New York: Academic Press.

Rawlins, W. K. (2000). Teaching as a Mode of Friendship. Communication Theory, 10(1), 5-26.

Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteding on the electronic frontier, URL (consulted 17 September 2010): http://www.planetfreebook.com/Classic_collection/classic_books_author_R_PDF_edited_filenames/Rheingold.Howard%20!The%20Virtual%20Community.pdf.

Rice, R. E., Sheperd, A., Dutton, W. H. & Katz, J. E. (2007). Social interaction and the internet: a comparative analysis of surveys in the US and Britain. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes & U. R. Reips (Eds.), Oxford handbooks of internet psychology (pp. 7-30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rusbult, C. E. & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationship: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 10, 175-204.

Shulman, S., Elicker, J., & Sroufe, L. A. (1994). Stages of friendship growth in preadolescence as related to attachment history. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 11, 341-361.

Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relatioship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 8, 217-242.

Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of psychology, 52, 83-110.

Tang, L. (2010). Development of online friendship in different social spaces. Information, Communication & Society, 13(4), 615-633.

Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Tapscott, D. (2009). Growing up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Tolhuizen, J. H. (1989). Affinity-seeking in developing relationships. Communication Reports, 2, 83-91.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). The effects of instant messaging on the quality of adolescents’ existing friendships: A longitudinal study. Journal of Communication, 59, 79–97.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Weiss, R. S. (1998). A taxonomy of relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 15, 671-683.

Wilkinson, H. (1995). ‘Take care in cyberspace,’ The Independence, 1 December, URL (consulted 17 September 2010): http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/take-care-in-cyberspace-children-1523488.html.

Wright, P. H. (1984). Self-referent motivation and the intrinsic quality of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 1, 115-130.

Wright, P. H. (1998). Towards an expanded orientation to the study of sex differnces in friendship. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 41-64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.		zh_TW